Grepping string, but include all non-blank lines following each grep match2019 Community Moderator ElectionHow can I grep a directory based on the contents of two successive lines?grep: Find all lines that contain Japanese kanjisBlank lines when executing “grep | xargs” in a “find -exec”How to use grep/awk/unix to match all lines from one file in another file, even if they are duplicatesRemove all the lines before the first line that contains a match?grep match all occurrences of multiple regular expressionsCompare two files and retrieve corresponding resultsregex and grep: match all letters in a listHow to search for a match, then a non-match on that line, but include context lines for matched line?How to `grep -v` and also exclude 'n' lines after the match?
Why does Carol not get rid of the Kree symbol on her suit when she changes its colours?
Multiplicative persistence
Why does the Sun have different day lengths, but not the gas giants?
Is there any evidence that Cleopatra and Caesarion considered fleeing to India to escape the Romans?
What fields between the rationals and the reals allow a good notion of 2D distance?
Why do ¬, ∀ and ∃ have the same precedence?
What kind of floor tile is this?
Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos breaking the Tesseract and claiming the stone?
Has any country ever had 2 former presidents in jail simultaneously?
Doesn't the system of the Supreme Court oppose justice?
C++ copy constructor called at return
Why is the "ls" command showing permissions of files in a FAT32 partition?
Did the UK lift the requirement for registering SIM cards?
Why is it that I can sometimes guess the next note?
A variation to the phrase "hanging over my shoulders"
Is this part of the description of the Archfey warlock's Misty Escape feature redundant?
Strong empirical falsification of quantum mechanics based on vacuum energy density?
Will number of steps recorded on FitBit/any fitness tracker add up distance in PokemonGo?
Why can't the Brexit deadlock in the UK parliament be solved with a plurality vote?
Review your own paper in Mathematics
Microchip documentation does not label CAN buss pins on micro controller pinout diagram
I found an audio circuit and I built it just fine, but I find it a bit too quiet. How do I amplify the output so that it is a bit louder?
Why does AES have exactly 10 rounds for a 128-bit key, 12 for 192 bits and 14 for a 256-bit key size?
Pre-mixing cryogenic fuels and using only one fuel tank
Grepping string, but include all non-blank lines following each grep match
2019 Community Moderator ElectionHow can I grep a directory based on the contents of two successive lines?grep: Find all lines that contain Japanese kanjisBlank lines when executing “grep | xargs” in a “find -exec”How to use grep/awk/unix to match all lines from one file in another file, even if they are duplicatesRemove all the lines before the first line that contains a match?grep match all occurrences of multiple regular expressionsCompare two files and retrieve corresponding resultsregex and grep: match all letters in a listHow to search for a match, then a non-match on that line, but include context lines for matched line?How to `grep -v` and also exclude 'n' lines after the match?
Consider the following toy example:
this is a line
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
This line also contains FOO
Some random text
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
More random text
FOO!
Yet more random text
FOO!
So, I want the results of a grep for FOO, but with the extra wrinkle that lines following the matching lines should be included, as long as they are not blank, and they do not themselves contain FOO. So the matches would look as follows, with the different matches separated:
MATCH 1
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
MATCH 2
This line also contains FOO
MATCH 3
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
MATCH 4
FOO!
Yet more random text
MATCH 5
FOO!
Bonus points (metaphorically speaking) for a simple single line script that can be run on the command line.
ADDENDUM: Adding a running count of the match number would be quite handy, if it is not too hard.
text-processing grep
|
show 4 more comments
Consider the following toy example:
this is a line
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
This line also contains FOO
Some random text
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
More random text
FOO!
Yet more random text
FOO!
So, I want the results of a grep for FOO, but with the extra wrinkle that lines following the matching lines should be included, as long as they are not blank, and they do not themselves contain FOO. So the matches would look as follows, with the different matches separated:
MATCH 1
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
MATCH 2
This line also contains FOO
MATCH 3
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
MATCH 4
FOO!
Yet more random text
MATCH 5
FOO!
Bonus points (metaphorically speaking) for a simple single line script that can be run on the command line.
ADDENDUM: Adding a running count of the match number would be quite handy, if it is not too hard.
text-processing grep
2
do you want all the Matches in one output or you want them to be ran separately ?
– Vivek Kanadiya
yesterday
I guess one output is fine, as long as they are clearly separated, say by a blank line.
– Faheem Mitha
yesterday
might not possible in one output but I can try to see in each separate output!
– Vivek Kanadiya
yesterday
For matches 4 & 5, the simple logic could say "I've matched (the 4th) "FOO", so I should continue printing in this matching block until I see a blank line, and so the final "FOO" is included in this block", but i see you've separated it -- because it's a separate "FOO" match. Do you require the 5th "FOO" to be printed separately?
– Jeff Schaller
yesterday
@JeffSchaller Yes, please separate different FOO matches.
– Faheem Mitha
yesterday
|
show 4 more comments
Consider the following toy example:
this is a line
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
This line also contains FOO
Some random text
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
More random text
FOO!
Yet more random text
FOO!
So, I want the results of a grep for FOO, but with the extra wrinkle that lines following the matching lines should be included, as long as they are not blank, and they do not themselves contain FOO. So the matches would look as follows, with the different matches separated:
MATCH 1
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
MATCH 2
This line also contains FOO
MATCH 3
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
MATCH 4
FOO!
Yet more random text
MATCH 5
FOO!
Bonus points (metaphorically speaking) for a simple single line script that can be run on the command line.
ADDENDUM: Adding a running count of the match number would be quite handy, if it is not too hard.
text-processing grep
Consider the following toy example:
this is a line
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
This line also contains FOO
Some random text
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
More random text
FOO!
Yet more random text
FOO!
So, I want the results of a grep for FOO, but with the extra wrinkle that lines following the matching lines should be included, as long as they are not blank, and they do not themselves contain FOO. So the matches would look as follows, with the different matches separated:
MATCH 1
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
MATCH 2
This line also contains FOO
MATCH 3
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
MATCH 4
FOO!
Yet more random text
MATCH 5
FOO!
Bonus points (metaphorically speaking) for a simple single line script that can be run on the command line.
ADDENDUM: Adding a running count of the match number would be quite handy, if it is not too hard.
text-processing grep
text-processing grep
edited yesterday
Faheem Mitha
asked yesterday
Faheem MithaFaheem Mitha
23.2k1884137
23.2k1884137
2
do you want all the Matches in one output or you want them to be ran separately ?
– Vivek Kanadiya
yesterday
I guess one output is fine, as long as they are clearly separated, say by a blank line.
– Faheem Mitha
yesterday
might not possible in one output but I can try to see in each separate output!
– Vivek Kanadiya
yesterday
For matches 4 & 5, the simple logic could say "I've matched (the 4th) "FOO", so I should continue printing in this matching block until I see a blank line, and so the final "FOO" is included in this block", but i see you've separated it -- because it's a separate "FOO" match. Do you require the 5th "FOO" to be printed separately?
– Jeff Schaller
yesterday
@JeffSchaller Yes, please separate different FOO matches.
– Faheem Mitha
yesterday
|
show 4 more comments
2
do you want all the Matches in one output or you want them to be ran separately ?
– Vivek Kanadiya
yesterday
I guess one output is fine, as long as they are clearly separated, say by a blank line.
– Faheem Mitha
yesterday
might not possible in one output but I can try to see in each separate output!
– Vivek Kanadiya
yesterday
For matches 4 & 5, the simple logic could say "I've matched (the 4th) "FOO", so I should continue printing in this matching block until I see a blank line, and so the final "FOO" is included in this block", but i see you've separated it -- because it's a separate "FOO" match. Do you require the 5th "FOO" to be printed separately?
– Jeff Schaller
yesterday
@JeffSchaller Yes, please separate different FOO matches.
– Faheem Mitha
yesterday
2
2
do you want all the Matches in one output or you want them to be ran separately ?
– Vivek Kanadiya
yesterday
do you want all the Matches in one output or you want them to be ran separately ?
– Vivek Kanadiya
yesterday
I guess one output is fine, as long as they are clearly separated, say by a blank line.
– Faheem Mitha
yesterday
I guess one output is fine, as long as they are clearly separated, say by a blank line.
– Faheem Mitha
yesterday
might not possible in one output but I can try to see in each separate output!
– Vivek Kanadiya
yesterday
might not possible in one output but I can try to see in each separate output!
– Vivek Kanadiya
yesterday
For matches 4 & 5, the simple logic could say "I've matched (the 4th) "FOO", so I should continue printing in this matching block until I see a blank line, and so the final "FOO" is included in this block", but i see you've separated it -- because it's a separate "FOO" match. Do you require the 5th "FOO" to be printed separately?
– Jeff Schaller
yesterday
For matches 4 & 5, the simple logic could say "I've matched (the 4th) "FOO", so I should continue printing in this matching block until I see a blank line, and so the final "FOO" is included in this block", but i see you've separated it -- because it's a separate "FOO" match. Do you require the 5th "FOO" to be printed separately?
– Jeff Schaller
yesterday
@JeffSchaller Yes, please separate different FOO matches.
– Faheem Mitha
yesterday
@JeffSchaller Yes, please separate different FOO matches.
– Faheem Mitha
yesterday
|
show 4 more comments
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
Using awk
rather than grep
:
awk '/FOO/ if (matching) printf("n"); matching = 1
/^$/ if (matching) printf("n"); matching = 0
matching' file
A version that enumerates the matches:
awk 'function flush_print_maybe()
if (matching) printf("Match %dn%snn", ++n, buf)
buf = ""
/FOO/ flush_print_maybe(); matching = 1
/^$/ flush_print_maybe(); matching = 0
matching buf = (buf == "" ? $0 : buf ORS $0)
END flush_print_maybe() ' file
Both awk
programs uses a very simple "state machine" to determine if it's currently matching or not matching. A match of the pattern FOO
will cause it to enter the matching
state, and a match of the pattern ^$
(an empty line) will cause it to enter the non-matching
state.
Output of empty lines between matching sets of data happens at state transitions from matching
(either into matching
or into non-matching
).
The first program prints any line when in the matching
state.
The second program collects lines in a buf
variable when in a matching
state. It flushes (empties) this after possibly printing it (depending on the state), together with a Match N
label at state transitions (when the first program would output an empty line).
Output of this last program on the sample data:
Match 1
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
Match 2
This line also contains FOO
Match 3
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
Match 4
FOO!
Yet more random text
Match 5
FOO!
Nitpicking, these output an extra blank line if there’s a non-matching section at the end of the input ;-).
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
@StephenKitt Yes. It will. Each result block will be terminated by an empty line.
– Kusalananda
yesterday
Only if there’s an empty line following the result block (so the example text in the question doesn’t cause an empty line to be printed at the end).
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
@StephenKitt It's almost midnight here, I'll get back to it later. :-)
– Kusalananda
yesterday
add a comment |
sed -ne '/FOO/x;P;x;/FOO/,/^$/p' testfile
Each block of non-empty lines in the output is a single chunk of matched data from the input. The number of newlines varies.
This
- suppresses output (
-n
); then - prints a blank line before every occurrence of "FOO" (
/FOO/x;P;x
- uses the empty hold space); - selects ranges of lines starting from ones containing FOO (
/FOO/
) and ending on empty lines (/^$/
); and finally - prints those lines (
p
).
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
This line also contains FOO
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
FOO!
Yet more random text
FOO!
add a comment |
I don’t think this is doable with grep
, but it is with AWK:
#! /usr/bin/awk -f
/FOO/
matched = 1
if (notfirst) print ""
notfirst = 1
/^$/
matched = 0
matched
With a count of matches:
#! /usr/bin/awk -f
/FOO/
matched = 1
if (matches) print ""
printf "Match %dn", ++matches
/^$/
matched = 0
matched
In both cases, the first two blocks determine whether the current record should be copied to the output. When the current record matches “FOO”, the first block sets matched
to 1, outputs a blank record if necessary (to separate the forthcoming output from the previous match); in the second variant, it also increments the matches
counter and outputs a header. When the current record is empty, the second block sets matched
to 0. The lonely matched
condition prints the current record if matched
is 1.
add a comment |
I've included a pcregrep
solution and a python
solution.
Multiline Grep Solution
If you have pcregrep
installed, you could use a multiline pattern, such as ^.*FOO.*$n?(^.*S.*$n?)*
, e.g.:
pcregrep -M '^.*FOO.*$n?(^.*S.*$n?)*' test.txt
The subexpression ^.*FOO.*$n?
will match any line containing the string FOO
and the subexpression (^.*S.*$n?)*
will match any number of subsequent lines that containing a non-whitespace character.
Python Solution
Here is a Python script that should do what you want:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
# -*- encoding: utf8 -*-
"""grep_follow.py
Search a text file for a pattern,
and output that pattern and the
non-empty lines which immediately follow it.
"""
import re
import sys
# Get the search pattern and the input file as command-line arguments
pattern = sys.argv[1]
input_file = sys.argv[2]
# Set a flag to determine whether or not to output the current line
print_flag = False
with open(input_file, "r") as _input_file:
# Iterate over the lines of the input file
for line in _input_file:
# Remove trailing whitespace
line = line.rstrip()
# If the line is empty, stop producing output
if not line.strip():
print_flag = False
# If the line matches the search pattern, start producing output
elif re.search(pattern, line):
print_flag = True
# If the print flag is set then output the line
if print_flag:
print(line)
You would run it like this:
$ python grep_follow.py FOO test.txt
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
This line also contains FOO
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
FOO!
Yet more random text
FOO!
1
a more intuitive regex in the eyes of this beholder is'(?s)^N*FOO.*?(?=Z|nn|N*FOON*)'
, but +1
– iruvar
yesterday
add a comment |
awk '/FOO/print "===match " ++i "===" /FOO/,/^$/' file
===match 1===
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
===match 2===
This line also contains FOO
===match 3===
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
===match 4===
FOO!
Yet more random text
===match 5===
FOO!
A similar variant where FOO
could be easily changed to something else:
awk -vpat=FOO '$0~patprint "===match " ++i "===" $0~pat,/^$/' file
Omitting the terminating empty line from the default print is left as an exercise to the reader ;-)
add a comment |
One way can be using Perl's
range operator ...
:
$ perl -lne '
print s|^(?=.*FOO)|$/."MATCH#".++$c.$/|re if /FOO/ ... /^$/;
' input.txt
MATCH#1
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
MATCH#2
This line also contains FOO
MATCH#3
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
MATCH#4
FOO!
Yet more random text
MATCH#5
FOO!
In case the extra blank lines are an issue, you can use the below code, where make use of the range operator in scalar context in order to have a peek into the state machine values and perform actions based on them.
Note :
$/
= RS = "n"
$,
= OFS = ""
$ perl -lne '
print
s^(?=.*FOO)
($,,$/)[$r>1] .
"MATCH#" . ++$count . $/
rex
if $r = /FOO/ ... /^$/;
' input.txt
Here's another method to tackle the pbm, this time using the paragraph mode
of Perl. We read in records a para at a time and split them on newlines into fields.
Then we make sure to handle only those paras that happen to have the string foo in them. Finally, we print the fields with the constraint on foo-containing fields being treated specially. Even here we deal with the first field differently than the rest.
$ perl -aln -F'n' -00 -e '
next unless /FOO/;
shift @F until $F[0] =~ /FOO/;
push @F, $, if ! eof;
print "MATCH#", ++$k, $, shift @F;
print for map /FOO/ and $_ = "nMATCH#" . ++$k . "n$_";$_ @F;
' input.txt
add a comment |
Here is a one-liner that may not exactly match the criteria, but comes close enough for most purposes.
gawk '/FOO/p=1 if(p) print /^$/p=0' infile.txt
First rule sets p=1
if it sees FOO. Second rule prints the current line if p is not zero. Third rule sets p=0
if the line (already printed) is blank. Swap second and third rules if you do not want the blank line terminator to be output.
This is a variant which numbers and separates the matches if there are multiple FOO instances not separated by blank lines
gawk '/FOO/p=1; n++; print "n" n /^$/p=0 //if (p) print $0 ' infile.txt
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f507517%2fgrepping-string-but-include-all-non-blank-lines-following-each-grep-match%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
7 Answers
7
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Using awk
rather than grep
:
awk '/FOO/ if (matching) printf("n"); matching = 1
/^$/ if (matching) printf("n"); matching = 0
matching' file
A version that enumerates the matches:
awk 'function flush_print_maybe()
if (matching) printf("Match %dn%snn", ++n, buf)
buf = ""
/FOO/ flush_print_maybe(); matching = 1
/^$/ flush_print_maybe(); matching = 0
matching buf = (buf == "" ? $0 : buf ORS $0)
END flush_print_maybe() ' file
Both awk
programs uses a very simple "state machine" to determine if it's currently matching or not matching. A match of the pattern FOO
will cause it to enter the matching
state, and a match of the pattern ^$
(an empty line) will cause it to enter the non-matching
state.
Output of empty lines between matching sets of data happens at state transitions from matching
(either into matching
or into non-matching
).
The first program prints any line when in the matching
state.
The second program collects lines in a buf
variable when in a matching
state. It flushes (empties) this after possibly printing it (depending on the state), together with a Match N
label at state transitions (when the first program would output an empty line).
Output of this last program on the sample data:
Match 1
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
Match 2
This line also contains FOO
Match 3
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
Match 4
FOO!
Yet more random text
Match 5
FOO!
Nitpicking, these output an extra blank line if there’s a non-matching section at the end of the input ;-).
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
@StephenKitt Yes. It will. Each result block will be terminated by an empty line.
– Kusalananda
yesterday
Only if there’s an empty line following the result block (so the example text in the question doesn’t cause an empty line to be printed at the end).
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
@StephenKitt It's almost midnight here, I'll get back to it later. :-)
– Kusalananda
yesterday
add a comment |
Using awk
rather than grep
:
awk '/FOO/ if (matching) printf("n"); matching = 1
/^$/ if (matching) printf("n"); matching = 0
matching' file
A version that enumerates the matches:
awk 'function flush_print_maybe()
if (matching) printf("Match %dn%snn", ++n, buf)
buf = ""
/FOO/ flush_print_maybe(); matching = 1
/^$/ flush_print_maybe(); matching = 0
matching buf = (buf == "" ? $0 : buf ORS $0)
END flush_print_maybe() ' file
Both awk
programs uses a very simple "state machine" to determine if it's currently matching or not matching. A match of the pattern FOO
will cause it to enter the matching
state, and a match of the pattern ^$
(an empty line) will cause it to enter the non-matching
state.
Output of empty lines between matching sets of data happens at state transitions from matching
(either into matching
or into non-matching
).
The first program prints any line when in the matching
state.
The second program collects lines in a buf
variable when in a matching
state. It flushes (empties) this after possibly printing it (depending on the state), together with a Match N
label at state transitions (when the first program would output an empty line).
Output of this last program on the sample data:
Match 1
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
Match 2
This line also contains FOO
Match 3
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
Match 4
FOO!
Yet more random text
Match 5
FOO!
Nitpicking, these output an extra blank line if there’s a non-matching section at the end of the input ;-).
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
@StephenKitt Yes. It will. Each result block will be terminated by an empty line.
– Kusalananda
yesterday
Only if there’s an empty line following the result block (so the example text in the question doesn’t cause an empty line to be printed at the end).
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
@StephenKitt It's almost midnight here, I'll get back to it later. :-)
– Kusalananda
yesterday
add a comment |
Using awk
rather than grep
:
awk '/FOO/ if (matching) printf("n"); matching = 1
/^$/ if (matching) printf("n"); matching = 0
matching' file
A version that enumerates the matches:
awk 'function flush_print_maybe()
if (matching) printf("Match %dn%snn", ++n, buf)
buf = ""
/FOO/ flush_print_maybe(); matching = 1
/^$/ flush_print_maybe(); matching = 0
matching buf = (buf == "" ? $0 : buf ORS $0)
END flush_print_maybe() ' file
Both awk
programs uses a very simple "state machine" to determine if it's currently matching or not matching. A match of the pattern FOO
will cause it to enter the matching
state, and a match of the pattern ^$
(an empty line) will cause it to enter the non-matching
state.
Output of empty lines between matching sets of data happens at state transitions from matching
(either into matching
or into non-matching
).
The first program prints any line when in the matching
state.
The second program collects lines in a buf
variable when in a matching
state. It flushes (empties) this after possibly printing it (depending on the state), together with a Match N
label at state transitions (when the first program would output an empty line).
Output of this last program on the sample data:
Match 1
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
Match 2
This line also contains FOO
Match 3
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
Match 4
FOO!
Yet more random text
Match 5
FOO!
Using awk
rather than grep
:
awk '/FOO/ if (matching) printf("n"); matching = 1
/^$/ if (matching) printf("n"); matching = 0
matching' file
A version that enumerates the matches:
awk 'function flush_print_maybe()
if (matching) printf("Match %dn%snn", ++n, buf)
buf = ""
/FOO/ flush_print_maybe(); matching = 1
/^$/ flush_print_maybe(); matching = 0
matching buf = (buf == "" ? $0 : buf ORS $0)
END flush_print_maybe() ' file
Both awk
programs uses a very simple "state machine" to determine if it's currently matching or not matching. A match of the pattern FOO
will cause it to enter the matching
state, and a match of the pattern ^$
(an empty line) will cause it to enter the non-matching
state.
Output of empty lines between matching sets of data happens at state transitions from matching
(either into matching
or into non-matching
).
The first program prints any line when in the matching
state.
The second program collects lines in a buf
variable when in a matching
state. It flushes (empties) this after possibly printing it (depending on the state), together with a Match N
label at state transitions (when the first program would output an empty line).
Output of this last program on the sample data:
Match 1
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
Match 2
This line also contains FOO
Match 3
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
Match 4
FOO!
Yet more random text
Match 5
FOO!
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
KusalanandaKusalananda
137k17258426
137k17258426
Nitpicking, these output an extra blank line if there’s a non-matching section at the end of the input ;-).
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
@StephenKitt Yes. It will. Each result block will be terminated by an empty line.
– Kusalananda
yesterday
Only if there’s an empty line following the result block (so the example text in the question doesn’t cause an empty line to be printed at the end).
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
@StephenKitt It's almost midnight here, I'll get back to it later. :-)
– Kusalananda
yesterday
add a comment |
Nitpicking, these output an extra blank line if there’s a non-matching section at the end of the input ;-).
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
@StephenKitt Yes. It will. Each result block will be terminated by an empty line.
– Kusalananda
yesterday
Only if there’s an empty line following the result block (so the example text in the question doesn’t cause an empty line to be printed at the end).
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
@StephenKitt It's almost midnight here, I'll get back to it later. :-)
– Kusalananda
yesterday
Nitpicking, these output an extra blank line if there’s a non-matching section at the end of the input ;-).
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
Nitpicking, these output an extra blank line if there’s a non-matching section at the end of the input ;-).
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
@StephenKitt Yes. It will. Each result block will be terminated by an empty line.
– Kusalananda
yesterday
@StephenKitt Yes. It will. Each result block will be terminated by an empty line.
– Kusalananda
yesterday
Only if there’s an empty line following the result block (so the example text in the question doesn’t cause an empty line to be printed at the end).
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
Only if there’s an empty line following the result block (so the example text in the question doesn’t cause an empty line to be printed at the end).
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
@StephenKitt It's almost midnight here, I'll get back to it later. :-)
– Kusalananda
yesterday
@StephenKitt It's almost midnight here, I'll get back to it later. :-)
– Kusalananda
yesterday
add a comment |
sed -ne '/FOO/x;P;x;/FOO/,/^$/p' testfile
Each block of non-empty lines in the output is a single chunk of matched data from the input. The number of newlines varies.
This
- suppresses output (
-n
); then - prints a blank line before every occurrence of "FOO" (
/FOO/x;P;x
- uses the empty hold space); - selects ranges of lines starting from ones containing FOO (
/FOO/
) and ending on empty lines (/^$/
); and finally - prints those lines (
p
).
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
This line also contains FOO
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
FOO!
Yet more random text
FOO!
add a comment |
sed -ne '/FOO/x;P;x;/FOO/,/^$/p' testfile
Each block of non-empty lines in the output is a single chunk of matched data from the input. The number of newlines varies.
This
- suppresses output (
-n
); then - prints a blank line before every occurrence of "FOO" (
/FOO/x;P;x
- uses the empty hold space); - selects ranges of lines starting from ones containing FOO (
/FOO/
) and ending on empty lines (/^$/
); and finally - prints those lines (
p
).
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
This line also contains FOO
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
FOO!
Yet more random text
FOO!
add a comment |
sed -ne '/FOO/x;P;x;/FOO/,/^$/p' testfile
Each block of non-empty lines in the output is a single chunk of matched data from the input. The number of newlines varies.
This
- suppresses output (
-n
); then - prints a blank line before every occurrence of "FOO" (
/FOO/x;P;x
- uses the empty hold space); - selects ranges of lines starting from ones containing FOO (
/FOO/
) and ending on empty lines (/^$/
); and finally - prints those lines (
p
).
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
This line also contains FOO
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
FOO!
Yet more random text
FOO!
sed -ne '/FOO/x;P;x;/FOO/,/^$/p' testfile
Each block of non-empty lines in the output is a single chunk of matched data from the input. The number of newlines varies.
This
- suppresses output (
-n
); then - prints a blank line before every occurrence of "FOO" (
/FOO/x;P;x
- uses the empty hold space); - selects ranges of lines starting from ones containing FOO (
/FOO/
) and ending on empty lines (/^$/
); and finally - prints those lines (
p
).
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
This line also contains FOO
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
FOO!
Yet more random text
FOO!
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Michael HomerMichael Homer
50k8137175
50k8137175
add a comment |
add a comment |
I don’t think this is doable with grep
, but it is with AWK:
#! /usr/bin/awk -f
/FOO/
matched = 1
if (notfirst) print ""
notfirst = 1
/^$/
matched = 0
matched
With a count of matches:
#! /usr/bin/awk -f
/FOO/
matched = 1
if (matches) print ""
printf "Match %dn", ++matches
/^$/
matched = 0
matched
In both cases, the first two blocks determine whether the current record should be copied to the output. When the current record matches “FOO”, the first block sets matched
to 1, outputs a blank record if necessary (to separate the forthcoming output from the previous match); in the second variant, it also increments the matches
counter and outputs a header. When the current record is empty, the second block sets matched
to 0. The lonely matched
condition prints the current record if matched
is 1.
add a comment |
I don’t think this is doable with grep
, but it is with AWK:
#! /usr/bin/awk -f
/FOO/
matched = 1
if (notfirst) print ""
notfirst = 1
/^$/
matched = 0
matched
With a count of matches:
#! /usr/bin/awk -f
/FOO/
matched = 1
if (matches) print ""
printf "Match %dn", ++matches
/^$/
matched = 0
matched
In both cases, the first two blocks determine whether the current record should be copied to the output. When the current record matches “FOO”, the first block sets matched
to 1, outputs a blank record if necessary (to separate the forthcoming output from the previous match); in the second variant, it also increments the matches
counter and outputs a header. When the current record is empty, the second block sets matched
to 0. The lonely matched
condition prints the current record if matched
is 1.
add a comment |
I don’t think this is doable with grep
, but it is with AWK:
#! /usr/bin/awk -f
/FOO/
matched = 1
if (notfirst) print ""
notfirst = 1
/^$/
matched = 0
matched
With a count of matches:
#! /usr/bin/awk -f
/FOO/
matched = 1
if (matches) print ""
printf "Match %dn", ++matches
/^$/
matched = 0
matched
In both cases, the first two blocks determine whether the current record should be copied to the output. When the current record matches “FOO”, the first block sets matched
to 1, outputs a blank record if necessary (to separate the forthcoming output from the previous match); in the second variant, it also increments the matches
counter and outputs a header. When the current record is empty, the second block sets matched
to 0. The lonely matched
condition prints the current record if matched
is 1.
I don’t think this is doable with grep
, but it is with AWK:
#! /usr/bin/awk -f
/FOO/
matched = 1
if (notfirst) print ""
notfirst = 1
/^$/
matched = 0
matched
With a count of matches:
#! /usr/bin/awk -f
/FOO/
matched = 1
if (matches) print ""
printf "Match %dn", ++matches
/^$/
matched = 0
matched
In both cases, the first two blocks determine whether the current record should be copied to the output. When the current record matches “FOO”, the first block sets matched
to 1, outputs a blank record if necessary (to separate the forthcoming output from the previous match); in the second variant, it also increments the matches
counter and outputs a header. When the current record is empty, the second block sets matched
to 0. The lonely matched
condition prints the current record if matched
is 1.
edited 20 hours ago
answered yesterday
Stephen KittStephen Kitt
177k24402480
177k24402480
add a comment |
add a comment |
I've included a pcregrep
solution and a python
solution.
Multiline Grep Solution
If you have pcregrep
installed, you could use a multiline pattern, such as ^.*FOO.*$n?(^.*S.*$n?)*
, e.g.:
pcregrep -M '^.*FOO.*$n?(^.*S.*$n?)*' test.txt
The subexpression ^.*FOO.*$n?
will match any line containing the string FOO
and the subexpression (^.*S.*$n?)*
will match any number of subsequent lines that containing a non-whitespace character.
Python Solution
Here is a Python script that should do what you want:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
# -*- encoding: utf8 -*-
"""grep_follow.py
Search a text file for a pattern,
and output that pattern and the
non-empty lines which immediately follow it.
"""
import re
import sys
# Get the search pattern and the input file as command-line arguments
pattern = sys.argv[1]
input_file = sys.argv[2]
# Set a flag to determine whether or not to output the current line
print_flag = False
with open(input_file, "r") as _input_file:
# Iterate over the lines of the input file
for line in _input_file:
# Remove trailing whitespace
line = line.rstrip()
# If the line is empty, stop producing output
if not line.strip():
print_flag = False
# If the line matches the search pattern, start producing output
elif re.search(pattern, line):
print_flag = True
# If the print flag is set then output the line
if print_flag:
print(line)
You would run it like this:
$ python grep_follow.py FOO test.txt
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
This line also contains FOO
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
FOO!
Yet more random text
FOO!
1
a more intuitive regex in the eyes of this beholder is'(?s)^N*FOO.*?(?=Z|nn|N*FOON*)'
, but +1
– iruvar
yesterday
add a comment |
I've included a pcregrep
solution and a python
solution.
Multiline Grep Solution
If you have pcregrep
installed, you could use a multiline pattern, such as ^.*FOO.*$n?(^.*S.*$n?)*
, e.g.:
pcregrep -M '^.*FOO.*$n?(^.*S.*$n?)*' test.txt
The subexpression ^.*FOO.*$n?
will match any line containing the string FOO
and the subexpression (^.*S.*$n?)*
will match any number of subsequent lines that containing a non-whitespace character.
Python Solution
Here is a Python script that should do what you want:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
# -*- encoding: utf8 -*-
"""grep_follow.py
Search a text file for a pattern,
and output that pattern and the
non-empty lines which immediately follow it.
"""
import re
import sys
# Get the search pattern and the input file as command-line arguments
pattern = sys.argv[1]
input_file = sys.argv[2]
# Set a flag to determine whether or not to output the current line
print_flag = False
with open(input_file, "r") as _input_file:
# Iterate over the lines of the input file
for line in _input_file:
# Remove trailing whitespace
line = line.rstrip()
# If the line is empty, stop producing output
if not line.strip():
print_flag = False
# If the line matches the search pattern, start producing output
elif re.search(pattern, line):
print_flag = True
# If the print flag is set then output the line
if print_flag:
print(line)
You would run it like this:
$ python grep_follow.py FOO test.txt
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
This line also contains FOO
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
FOO!
Yet more random text
FOO!
1
a more intuitive regex in the eyes of this beholder is'(?s)^N*FOO.*?(?=Z|nn|N*FOON*)'
, but +1
– iruvar
yesterday
add a comment |
I've included a pcregrep
solution and a python
solution.
Multiline Grep Solution
If you have pcregrep
installed, you could use a multiline pattern, such as ^.*FOO.*$n?(^.*S.*$n?)*
, e.g.:
pcregrep -M '^.*FOO.*$n?(^.*S.*$n?)*' test.txt
The subexpression ^.*FOO.*$n?
will match any line containing the string FOO
and the subexpression (^.*S.*$n?)*
will match any number of subsequent lines that containing a non-whitespace character.
Python Solution
Here is a Python script that should do what you want:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
# -*- encoding: utf8 -*-
"""grep_follow.py
Search a text file for a pattern,
and output that pattern and the
non-empty lines which immediately follow it.
"""
import re
import sys
# Get the search pattern and the input file as command-line arguments
pattern = sys.argv[1]
input_file = sys.argv[2]
# Set a flag to determine whether or not to output the current line
print_flag = False
with open(input_file, "r") as _input_file:
# Iterate over the lines of the input file
for line in _input_file:
# Remove trailing whitespace
line = line.rstrip()
# If the line is empty, stop producing output
if not line.strip():
print_flag = False
# If the line matches the search pattern, start producing output
elif re.search(pattern, line):
print_flag = True
# If the print flag is set then output the line
if print_flag:
print(line)
You would run it like this:
$ python grep_follow.py FOO test.txt
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
This line also contains FOO
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
FOO!
Yet more random text
FOO!
I've included a pcregrep
solution and a python
solution.
Multiline Grep Solution
If you have pcregrep
installed, you could use a multiline pattern, such as ^.*FOO.*$n?(^.*S.*$n?)*
, e.g.:
pcregrep -M '^.*FOO.*$n?(^.*S.*$n?)*' test.txt
The subexpression ^.*FOO.*$n?
will match any line containing the string FOO
and the subexpression (^.*S.*$n?)*
will match any number of subsequent lines that containing a non-whitespace character.
Python Solution
Here is a Python script that should do what you want:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
# -*- encoding: utf8 -*-
"""grep_follow.py
Search a text file for a pattern,
and output that pattern and the
non-empty lines which immediately follow it.
"""
import re
import sys
# Get the search pattern and the input file as command-line arguments
pattern = sys.argv[1]
input_file = sys.argv[2]
# Set a flag to determine whether or not to output the current line
print_flag = False
with open(input_file, "r") as _input_file:
# Iterate over the lines of the input file
for line in _input_file:
# Remove trailing whitespace
line = line.rstrip()
# If the line is empty, stop producing output
if not line.strip():
print_flag = False
# If the line matches the search pattern, start producing output
elif re.search(pattern, line):
print_flag = True
# If the print flag is set then output the line
if print_flag:
print(line)
You would run it like this:
$ python grep_follow.py FOO test.txt
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
This line also contains FOO
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
FOO!
Yet more random text
FOO!
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
igaligal
5,9611536
5,9611536
1
a more intuitive regex in the eyes of this beholder is'(?s)^N*FOO.*?(?=Z|nn|N*FOON*)'
, but +1
– iruvar
yesterday
add a comment |
1
a more intuitive regex in the eyes of this beholder is'(?s)^N*FOO.*?(?=Z|nn|N*FOON*)'
, but +1
– iruvar
yesterday
1
1
a more intuitive regex in the eyes of this beholder is
'(?s)^N*FOO.*?(?=Z|nn|N*FOON*)'
, but +1– iruvar
yesterday
a more intuitive regex in the eyes of this beholder is
'(?s)^N*FOO.*?(?=Z|nn|N*FOON*)'
, but +1– iruvar
yesterday
add a comment |
awk '/FOO/print "===match " ++i "===" /FOO/,/^$/' file
===match 1===
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
===match 2===
This line also contains FOO
===match 3===
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
===match 4===
FOO!
Yet more random text
===match 5===
FOO!
A similar variant where FOO
could be easily changed to something else:
awk -vpat=FOO '$0~patprint "===match " ++i "===" $0~pat,/^$/' file
Omitting the terminating empty line from the default print is left as an exercise to the reader ;-)
add a comment |
awk '/FOO/print "===match " ++i "===" /FOO/,/^$/' file
===match 1===
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
===match 2===
This line also contains FOO
===match 3===
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
===match 4===
FOO!
Yet more random text
===match 5===
FOO!
A similar variant where FOO
could be easily changed to something else:
awk -vpat=FOO '$0~patprint "===match " ++i "===" $0~pat,/^$/' file
Omitting the terminating empty line from the default print is left as an exercise to the reader ;-)
add a comment |
awk '/FOO/print "===match " ++i "===" /FOO/,/^$/' file
===match 1===
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
===match 2===
This line also contains FOO
===match 3===
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
===match 4===
FOO!
Yet more random text
===match 5===
FOO!
A similar variant where FOO
could be easily changed to something else:
awk -vpat=FOO '$0~patprint "===match " ++i "===" $0~pat,/^$/' file
Omitting the terminating empty line from the default print is left as an exercise to the reader ;-)
awk '/FOO/print "===match " ++i "===" /FOO/,/^$/' file
===match 1===
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
===match 2===
This line also contains FOO
===match 3===
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
===match 4===
FOO!
Yet more random text
===match 5===
FOO!
A similar variant where FOO
could be easily changed to something else:
awk -vpat=FOO '$0~patprint "===match " ++i "===" $0~pat,/^$/' file
Omitting the terminating empty line from the default print is left as an exercise to the reader ;-)
answered yesterday
mosvymosvy
8,3521732
8,3521732
add a comment |
add a comment |
One way can be using Perl's
range operator ...
:
$ perl -lne '
print s|^(?=.*FOO)|$/."MATCH#".++$c.$/|re if /FOO/ ... /^$/;
' input.txt
MATCH#1
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
MATCH#2
This line also contains FOO
MATCH#3
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
MATCH#4
FOO!
Yet more random text
MATCH#5
FOO!
In case the extra blank lines are an issue, you can use the below code, where make use of the range operator in scalar context in order to have a peek into the state machine values and perform actions based on them.
Note :
$/
= RS = "n"
$,
= OFS = ""
$ perl -lne '
print
s^(?=.*FOO)
($,,$/)[$r>1] .
"MATCH#" . ++$count . $/
rex
if $r = /FOO/ ... /^$/;
' input.txt
Here's another method to tackle the pbm, this time using the paragraph mode
of Perl. We read in records a para at a time and split them on newlines into fields.
Then we make sure to handle only those paras that happen to have the string foo in them. Finally, we print the fields with the constraint on foo-containing fields being treated specially. Even here we deal with the first field differently than the rest.
$ perl -aln -F'n' -00 -e '
next unless /FOO/;
shift @F until $F[0] =~ /FOO/;
push @F, $, if ! eof;
print "MATCH#", ++$k, $, shift @F;
print for map /FOO/ and $_ = "nMATCH#" . ++$k . "n$_";$_ @F;
' input.txt
add a comment |
One way can be using Perl's
range operator ...
:
$ perl -lne '
print s|^(?=.*FOO)|$/."MATCH#".++$c.$/|re if /FOO/ ... /^$/;
' input.txt
MATCH#1
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
MATCH#2
This line also contains FOO
MATCH#3
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
MATCH#4
FOO!
Yet more random text
MATCH#5
FOO!
In case the extra blank lines are an issue, you can use the below code, where make use of the range operator in scalar context in order to have a peek into the state machine values and perform actions based on them.
Note :
$/
= RS = "n"
$,
= OFS = ""
$ perl -lne '
print
s^(?=.*FOO)
($,,$/)[$r>1] .
"MATCH#" . ++$count . $/
rex
if $r = /FOO/ ... /^$/;
' input.txt
Here's another method to tackle the pbm, this time using the paragraph mode
of Perl. We read in records a para at a time and split them on newlines into fields.
Then we make sure to handle only those paras that happen to have the string foo in them. Finally, we print the fields with the constraint on foo-containing fields being treated specially. Even here we deal with the first field differently than the rest.
$ perl -aln -F'n' -00 -e '
next unless /FOO/;
shift @F until $F[0] =~ /FOO/;
push @F, $, if ! eof;
print "MATCH#", ++$k, $, shift @F;
print for map /FOO/ and $_ = "nMATCH#" . ++$k . "n$_";$_ @F;
' input.txt
add a comment |
One way can be using Perl's
range operator ...
:
$ perl -lne '
print s|^(?=.*FOO)|$/."MATCH#".++$c.$/|re if /FOO/ ... /^$/;
' input.txt
MATCH#1
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
MATCH#2
This line also contains FOO
MATCH#3
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
MATCH#4
FOO!
Yet more random text
MATCH#5
FOO!
In case the extra blank lines are an issue, you can use the below code, where make use of the range operator in scalar context in order to have a peek into the state machine values and perform actions based on them.
Note :
$/
= RS = "n"
$,
= OFS = ""
$ perl -lne '
print
s^(?=.*FOO)
($,,$/)[$r>1] .
"MATCH#" . ++$count . $/
rex
if $r = /FOO/ ... /^$/;
' input.txt
Here's another method to tackle the pbm, this time using the paragraph mode
of Perl. We read in records a para at a time and split them on newlines into fields.
Then we make sure to handle only those paras that happen to have the string foo in them. Finally, we print the fields with the constraint on foo-containing fields being treated specially. Even here we deal with the first field differently than the rest.
$ perl -aln -F'n' -00 -e '
next unless /FOO/;
shift @F until $F[0] =~ /FOO/;
push @F, $, if ! eof;
print "MATCH#", ++$k, $, shift @F;
print for map /FOO/ and $_ = "nMATCH#" . ++$k . "n$_";$_ @F;
' input.txt
One way can be using Perl's
range operator ...
:
$ perl -lne '
print s|^(?=.*FOO)|$/."MATCH#".++$c.$/|re if /FOO/ ... /^$/;
' input.txt
MATCH#1
this line contains FOO
this line is not blank
MATCH#2
This line also contains FOO
MATCH#3
This line contains FOO too
Not blank
Also not blank
MATCH#4
FOO!
Yet more random text
MATCH#5
FOO!
In case the extra blank lines are an issue, you can use the below code, where make use of the range operator in scalar context in order to have a peek into the state machine values and perform actions based on them.
Note :
$/
= RS = "n"
$,
= OFS = ""
$ perl -lne '
print
s^(?=.*FOO)
($,,$/)[$r>1] .
"MATCH#" . ++$count . $/
rex
if $r = /FOO/ ... /^$/;
' input.txt
Here's another method to tackle the pbm, this time using the paragraph mode
of Perl. We read in records a para at a time and split them on newlines into fields.
Then we make sure to handle only those paras that happen to have the string foo in them. Finally, we print the fields with the constraint on foo-containing fields being treated specially. Even here we deal with the first field differently than the rest.
$ perl -aln -F'n' -00 -e '
next unless /FOO/;
shift @F until $F[0] =~ /FOO/;
push @F, $, if ! eof;
print "MATCH#", ++$k, $, shift @F;
print for map /FOO/ and $_ = "nMATCH#" . ++$k . "n$_";$_ @F;
' input.txt
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Rakesh SharmaRakesh Sharma
342115
342115
add a comment |
add a comment |
Here is a one-liner that may not exactly match the criteria, but comes close enough for most purposes.
gawk '/FOO/p=1 if(p) print /^$/p=0' infile.txt
First rule sets p=1
if it sees FOO. Second rule prints the current line if p is not zero. Third rule sets p=0
if the line (already printed) is blank. Swap second and third rules if you do not want the blank line terminator to be output.
This is a variant which numbers and separates the matches if there are multiple FOO instances not separated by blank lines
gawk '/FOO/p=1; n++; print "n" n /^$/p=0 //if (p) print $0 ' infile.txt
add a comment |
Here is a one-liner that may not exactly match the criteria, but comes close enough for most purposes.
gawk '/FOO/p=1 if(p) print /^$/p=0' infile.txt
First rule sets p=1
if it sees FOO. Second rule prints the current line if p is not zero. Third rule sets p=0
if the line (already printed) is blank. Swap second and third rules if you do not want the blank line terminator to be output.
This is a variant which numbers and separates the matches if there are multiple FOO instances not separated by blank lines
gawk '/FOO/p=1; n++; print "n" n /^$/p=0 //if (p) print $0 ' infile.txt
add a comment |
Here is a one-liner that may not exactly match the criteria, but comes close enough for most purposes.
gawk '/FOO/p=1 if(p) print /^$/p=0' infile.txt
First rule sets p=1
if it sees FOO. Second rule prints the current line if p is not zero. Third rule sets p=0
if the line (already printed) is blank. Swap second and third rules if you do not want the blank line terminator to be output.
This is a variant which numbers and separates the matches if there are multiple FOO instances not separated by blank lines
gawk '/FOO/p=1; n++; print "n" n /^$/p=0 //if (p) print $0 ' infile.txt
Here is a one-liner that may not exactly match the criteria, but comes close enough for most purposes.
gawk '/FOO/p=1 if(p) print /^$/p=0' infile.txt
First rule sets p=1
if it sees FOO. Second rule prints the current line if p is not zero. Third rule sets p=0
if the line (already printed) is blank. Swap second and third rules if you do not want the blank line terminator to be output.
This is a variant which numbers and separates the matches if there are multiple FOO instances not separated by blank lines
gawk '/FOO/p=1; n++; print "n" n /^$/p=0 //if (p) print $0 ' infile.txt
answered 13 hours ago
nigel222nigel222
1514
1514
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f507517%2fgrepping-string-but-include-all-non-blank-lines-following-each-grep-match%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
do you want all the Matches in one output or you want them to be ran separately ?
– Vivek Kanadiya
yesterday
I guess one output is fine, as long as they are clearly separated, say by a blank line.
– Faheem Mitha
yesterday
might not possible in one output but I can try to see in each separate output!
– Vivek Kanadiya
yesterday
For matches 4 & 5, the simple logic could say "I've matched (the 4th) "FOO", so I should continue printing in this matching block until I see a blank line, and so the final "FOO" is included in this block", but i see you've separated it -- because it's a separate "FOO" match. Do you require the 5th "FOO" to be printed separately?
– Jeff Schaller
yesterday
@JeffSchaller Yes, please separate different FOO matches.
– Faheem Mitha
yesterday