Dative vs AccusativeWelchen Fall verwendet man mit Präposition “ohne”?Which one is correct: “dir” or “dich”? Dative or Accusative?How are accusative and dative combined in one sentence?When to use dative or accusative object with “sitzen”?Dative or accusative object comes first?“dich” in “Ich glaube (an) dich” — accusative or dative?Dative and Accusative ConfusionAccusative or dative case, how to detect “action” and “movement”?Accusative vs Dative: “Schau in der/die Schublade!”The order of dative and accusative in a sentenceDative or Accusative first?
Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?
Are paving bricks differently sized for sand bedding vs mortar bedding?
dpdt switch to spst switch
Where does the bonus feat in the cleric starting package come from?
How to implement a feedback to keep the DC gain at zero for this conceptual passive filter?
Did Swami Prabhupada reject Advaita?
L1 and Ln cache: when are they written?
New brakes for 90s road bike
How can Trident be so inexpensive? Will it orbit Triton or just do a (slow) flyby?
Not using 's' for he/she/it
What does "Scientists rise up against statistical significance" mean? (Comment in Nature)
How to indicate a cut out for a product window
What should you do if you miss a job interview (deliberately)?
How can "mimic phobia" be cured or prevented?
Should I outline or discovery write my stories?
Symbol used to indicate indivisibility
What if a revenant (monster) gains fire resistance?
A social experiment. What is the worst that can happen?
Travelling outside the UK without a passport
Aragorn's "guise" in the Orthanc Stone
How should I respond when I lied about my education and the company finds out through background check?
is this legal and f i dont come up with extra money is the deal off
Count the occurrence of each unique word in the file
Pre-mixing cryogenic fuels and using only one fuel tank
Dative vs Accusative
Welchen Fall verwendet man mit Präposition “ohne”?Which one is correct: “dir” or “dich”? Dative or Accusative?How are accusative and dative combined in one sentence?When to use dative or accusative object with “sitzen”?Dative or accusative object comes first?“dich” in “Ich glaube (an) dich” — accusative or dative?Dative and Accusative ConfusionAccusative or dative case, how to detect “action” and “movement”?Accusative vs Dative: “Schau in der/die Schublade!”The order of dative and accusative in a sentenceDative or Accusative first?
I was doing some dative preposition exercises to familiarize myself with how they use it in german. I came across this sentence
Ich spreche mit meinem Bruder
Why is it "mit meinem" and not "mit meinen"? Ain't I speaking directly to my brother?
PS : Just started learning not too long ago.
dative
New contributor
|
show 1 more comment
I was doing some dative preposition exercises to familiarize myself with how they use it in german. I came across this sentence
Ich spreche mit meinem Bruder
Why is it "mit meinem" and not "mit meinen"? Ain't I speaking directly to my brother?
PS : Just started learning not too long ago.
dative
New contributor
So some preposition will always follow either dative or accusation?
– Mun Wai
yesterday
1
@MunWai Exactly. "mit" is easy to learn. But, for example, why "think about X" means "denken an + Dativ", probably no one can say.
– peterh
yesterday
4
»Denken an« takes Akkusativ!
– Raketenolli
yesterday
6
"speaking directly to my brother" I think I know what the problem is. I bet someone told you about direct and indirect objects. Please forget this concept! It is misleading. It helps only in 90% of all sentences and is wrong in 10%. In German grammar the terms "direktes Objekt" and "indirektes Objekt" doesn't exists. Take any German grammar book and search for those terms: You won't find them. German has dative object, accusative objects, genitive objects, prepositional objects, and some also use the term "nominative object", but there is no direct object. Please forget it and ignore it.
– Hubert Schölnast
yesterday
1
@Raketenolli Well, "Denken an" can take the dative if the thinker was standing on top of the brother...
– RedSonja
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
I was doing some dative preposition exercises to familiarize myself with how they use it in german. I came across this sentence
Ich spreche mit meinem Bruder
Why is it "mit meinem" and not "mit meinen"? Ain't I speaking directly to my brother?
PS : Just started learning not too long ago.
dative
New contributor
I was doing some dative preposition exercises to familiarize myself with how they use it in german. I came across this sentence
Ich spreche mit meinem Bruder
Why is it "mit meinem" and not "mit meinen"? Ain't I speaking directly to my brother?
PS : Just started learning not too long ago.
dative
dative
New contributor
New contributor
edited yesterday
IQV
10.3k2947
10.3k2947
New contributor
asked yesterday
Mun WaiMun Wai
383
383
New contributor
New contributor
So some preposition will always follow either dative or accusation?
– Mun Wai
yesterday
1
@MunWai Exactly. "mit" is easy to learn. But, for example, why "think about X" means "denken an + Dativ", probably no one can say.
– peterh
yesterday
4
»Denken an« takes Akkusativ!
– Raketenolli
yesterday
6
"speaking directly to my brother" I think I know what the problem is. I bet someone told you about direct and indirect objects. Please forget this concept! It is misleading. It helps only in 90% of all sentences and is wrong in 10%. In German grammar the terms "direktes Objekt" and "indirektes Objekt" doesn't exists. Take any German grammar book and search for those terms: You won't find them. German has dative object, accusative objects, genitive objects, prepositional objects, and some also use the term "nominative object", but there is no direct object. Please forget it and ignore it.
– Hubert Schölnast
yesterday
1
@Raketenolli Well, "Denken an" can take the dative if the thinker was standing on top of the brother...
– RedSonja
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
So some preposition will always follow either dative or accusation?
– Mun Wai
yesterday
1
@MunWai Exactly. "mit" is easy to learn. But, for example, why "think about X" means "denken an + Dativ", probably no one can say.
– peterh
yesterday
4
»Denken an« takes Akkusativ!
– Raketenolli
yesterday
6
"speaking directly to my brother" I think I know what the problem is. I bet someone told you about direct and indirect objects. Please forget this concept! It is misleading. It helps only in 90% of all sentences and is wrong in 10%. In German grammar the terms "direktes Objekt" and "indirektes Objekt" doesn't exists. Take any German grammar book and search for those terms: You won't find them. German has dative object, accusative objects, genitive objects, prepositional objects, and some also use the term "nominative object", but there is no direct object. Please forget it and ignore it.
– Hubert Schölnast
yesterday
1
@Raketenolli Well, "Denken an" can take the dative if the thinker was standing on top of the brother...
– RedSonja
yesterday
So some preposition will always follow either dative or accusation?
– Mun Wai
yesterday
So some preposition will always follow either dative or accusation?
– Mun Wai
yesterday
1
1
@MunWai Exactly. "mit" is easy to learn. But, for example, why "think about X" means "denken an + Dativ", probably no one can say.
– peterh
yesterday
@MunWai Exactly. "mit" is easy to learn. But, for example, why "think about X" means "denken an + Dativ", probably no one can say.
– peterh
yesterday
4
4
»Denken an« takes Akkusativ!
– Raketenolli
yesterday
»Denken an« takes Akkusativ!
– Raketenolli
yesterday
6
6
"speaking directly to my brother" I think I know what the problem is. I bet someone told you about direct and indirect objects. Please forget this concept! It is misleading. It helps only in 90% of all sentences and is wrong in 10%. In German grammar the terms "direktes Objekt" and "indirektes Objekt" doesn't exists. Take any German grammar book and search for those terms: You won't find them. German has dative object, accusative objects, genitive objects, prepositional objects, and some also use the term "nominative object", but there is no direct object. Please forget it and ignore it.
– Hubert Schölnast
yesterday
"speaking directly to my brother" I think I know what the problem is. I bet someone told you about direct and indirect objects. Please forget this concept! It is misleading. It helps only in 90% of all sentences and is wrong in 10%. In German grammar the terms "direktes Objekt" and "indirektes Objekt" doesn't exists. Take any German grammar book and search for those terms: You won't find them. German has dative object, accusative objects, genitive objects, prepositional objects, and some also use the term "nominative object", but there is no direct object. Please forget it and ignore it.
– Hubert Schölnast
yesterday
1
1
@Raketenolli Well, "Denken an" can take the dative if the thinker was standing on top of the brother...
– RedSonja
yesterday
@Raketenolli Well, "Denken an" can take the dative if the thinker was standing on top of the brother...
– RedSonja
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The components of this sentence are:
ich
subject
personal pronoun, first person, singular, nominative casespreche
predicate
verb (a form of "sprechen"), first person, singular, present tensemit meinem Bruder
prepositional object
The verb sprechen (to speak, to talk) can have these kinds of objects:
accusative object
What are you speaking? (What is coming out of your mouth when you are speaking?) (Rare: Who are you speaking?)
Ich spreche deine Sprache. (I speak your language.)
Ich spreche nur den ersten Satz. (I speak only the first sentence.)
Ich spreche meinen Bruder.The last sentence is rare and can have two meanings:
- I will meet my brother and will have a conversation with him. You use this version often with an additional temporal adverb (»Morgen spreche ich meinen Bruder und da werden wir dann die weitere Vorgehensweise klären.« = Tomorrow I will meet my brother and then we will clarify the further course of action.) (This example also shows, that German Präsens can be future tense in English.)
- There is an audio drama about my brother, and in this drama I am speaking the role of my brother.
prepositional object with "über"
About who or what are you speaking? (What is the topic of the conversation?)
Ich spreche über das Wetter. (I talk about the weather.)
Ich spreche über das Auto. (I talk about the car.)
Ich spreche über meinen Bruder. (I talk about my brother.)prepositional object with "mit"
With whom are you talking? (Who is the other participant of the conversation?)
Ich spreche mit dem Lehrer. (I talk with the teacher.)
Ich spreche mit der Chefin. (I talk with the boss.)
Ich spreche mit meinem Bruder. (I talk with my brother.)
Note, that there are also prepositional objects with other predicates and that you also can have more of them in a sentence, like in this example (I put each prepositional object in square brackets):
»Der König spricht [während des Festes] [dank der neuen Technik] [durch ein Megaphon] [zu seinem Volk].« = The king speaks [during the festival] [thanks to the new technique] [through a megaphone] [to his people].
Prepositional objects consists of two parts. The first part is the preposition, and this preposition dictates the grammatical case of the second part:
mit (with)
always needs dative case
Ich tanze mit meiner Tante (I dance with my aunt.)
Er hat sie mit einem scharfen Messer erstochen. (He stabbed her with a sharp knife.)
Er übt mit großer Leidenschaft. (He practices with great passion.)
These are some frequently used prepositions that always need dative:
aus, bei, mit, nach, seit
But there are also prepositions that always need accusative:
durch, für, gegen, ohne, um
Lots of prepositios need genitive case:
dank, trotz, fern, nördlich, während
And there are also prepositions which can go with dative or accusative, depending on the meaning:
auf, in, über, vor, zwischen
(Non of the lists is complete.)
I remember in first classes some sports activity to learn the prepositions for dative with a box and thus your list of prepositions would be dative only - as this site suggests I'm wrong :-o learn-german-smarter.com/learn-german-prepositions - so the location meanings goes to dative
– Shegit Brahm
yesterday
Just read through, thank you for the informative answer! It was of big help!
– Mun Wai
yesterday
1
@Shegit Brahm: No. Only for the nine dual-way prepositions dative means location while accusative means direction. For all other prepositions, it's arbitrary.
– Janka
yesterday
Nice list! The fact that "mit" und "ohne" ("with" and "without") require different grammatical cases can be confusing even for native speakers.
– Heinzi
yesterday
Just a note that the list of prepositions is not complete (von, gegen, auf ...).
– Peter A. Schneider
yesterday
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "253"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Mun Wai is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgerman.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f50248%2fdative-vs-accusative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The components of this sentence are:
ich
subject
personal pronoun, first person, singular, nominative casespreche
predicate
verb (a form of "sprechen"), first person, singular, present tensemit meinem Bruder
prepositional object
The verb sprechen (to speak, to talk) can have these kinds of objects:
accusative object
What are you speaking? (What is coming out of your mouth when you are speaking?) (Rare: Who are you speaking?)
Ich spreche deine Sprache. (I speak your language.)
Ich spreche nur den ersten Satz. (I speak only the first sentence.)
Ich spreche meinen Bruder.The last sentence is rare and can have two meanings:
- I will meet my brother and will have a conversation with him. You use this version often with an additional temporal adverb (»Morgen spreche ich meinen Bruder und da werden wir dann die weitere Vorgehensweise klären.« = Tomorrow I will meet my brother and then we will clarify the further course of action.) (This example also shows, that German Präsens can be future tense in English.)
- There is an audio drama about my brother, and in this drama I am speaking the role of my brother.
prepositional object with "über"
About who or what are you speaking? (What is the topic of the conversation?)
Ich spreche über das Wetter. (I talk about the weather.)
Ich spreche über das Auto. (I talk about the car.)
Ich spreche über meinen Bruder. (I talk about my brother.)prepositional object with "mit"
With whom are you talking? (Who is the other participant of the conversation?)
Ich spreche mit dem Lehrer. (I talk with the teacher.)
Ich spreche mit der Chefin. (I talk with the boss.)
Ich spreche mit meinem Bruder. (I talk with my brother.)
Note, that there are also prepositional objects with other predicates and that you also can have more of them in a sentence, like in this example (I put each prepositional object in square brackets):
»Der König spricht [während des Festes] [dank der neuen Technik] [durch ein Megaphon] [zu seinem Volk].« = The king speaks [during the festival] [thanks to the new technique] [through a megaphone] [to his people].
Prepositional objects consists of two parts. The first part is the preposition, and this preposition dictates the grammatical case of the second part:
mit (with)
always needs dative case
Ich tanze mit meiner Tante (I dance with my aunt.)
Er hat sie mit einem scharfen Messer erstochen. (He stabbed her with a sharp knife.)
Er übt mit großer Leidenschaft. (He practices with great passion.)
These are some frequently used prepositions that always need dative:
aus, bei, mit, nach, seit
But there are also prepositions that always need accusative:
durch, für, gegen, ohne, um
Lots of prepositios need genitive case:
dank, trotz, fern, nördlich, während
And there are also prepositions which can go with dative or accusative, depending on the meaning:
auf, in, über, vor, zwischen
(Non of the lists is complete.)
I remember in first classes some sports activity to learn the prepositions for dative with a box and thus your list of prepositions would be dative only - as this site suggests I'm wrong :-o learn-german-smarter.com/learn-german-prepositions - so the location meanings goes to dative
– Shegit Brahm
yesterday
Just read through, thank you for the informative answer! It was of big help!
– Mun Wai
yesterday
1
@Shegit Brahm: No. Only for the nine dual-way prepositions dative means location while accusative means direction. For all other prepositions, it's arbitrary.
– Janka
yesterday
Nice list! The fact that "mit" und "ohne" ("with" and "without") require different grammatical cases can be confusing even for native speakers.
– Heinzi
yesterday
Just a note that the list of prepositions is not complete (von, gegen, auf ...).
– Peter A. Schneider
yesterday
|
show 2 more comments
The components of this sentence are:
ich
subject
personal pronoun, first person, singular, nominative casespreche
predicate
verb (a form of "sprechen"), first person, singular, present tensemit meinem Bruder
prepositional object
The verb sprechen (to speak, to talk) can have these kinds of objects:
accusative object
What are you speaking? (What is coming out of your mouth when you are speaking?) (Rare: Who are you speaking?)
Ich spreche deine Sprache. (I speak your language.)
Ich spreche nur den ersten Satz. (I speak only the first sentence.)
Ich spreche meinen Bruder.The last sentence is rare and can have two meanings:
- I will meet my brother and will have a conversation with him. You use this version often with an additional temporal adverb (»Morgen spreche ich meinen Bruder und da werden wir dann die weitere Vorgehensweise klären.« = Tomorrow I will meet my brother and then we will clarify the further course of action.) (This example also shows, that German Präsens can be future tense in English.)
- There is an audio drama about my brother, and in this drama I am speaking the role of my brother.
prepositional object with "über"
About who or what are you speaking? (What is the topic of the conversation?)
Ich spreche über das Wetter. (I talk about the weather.)
Ich spreche über das Auto. (I talk about the car.)
Ich spreche über meinen Bruder. (I talk about my brother.)prepositional object with "mit"
With whom are you talking? (Who is the other participant of the conversation?)
Ich spreche mit dem Lehrer. (I talk with the teacher.)
Ich spreche mit der Chefin. (I talk with the boss.)
Ich spreche mit meinem Bruder. (I talk with my brother.)
Note, that there are also prepositional objects with other predicates and that you also can have more of them in a sentence, like in this example (I put each prepositional object in square brackets):
»Der König spricht [während des Festes] [dank der neuen Technik] [durch ein Megaphon] [zu seinem Volk].« = The king speaks [during the festival] [thanks to the new technique] [through a megaphone] [to his people].
Prepositional objects consists of two parts. The first part is the preposition, and this preposition dictates the grammatical case of the second part:
mit (with)
always needs dative case
Ich tanze mit meiner Tante (I dance with my aunt.)
Er hat sie mit einem scharfen Messer erstochen. (He stabbed her with a sharp knife.)
Er übt mit großer Leidenschaft. (He practices with great passion.)
These are some frequently used prepositions that always need dative:
aus, bei, mit, nach, seit
But there are also prepositions that always need accusative:
durch, für, gegen, ohne, um
Lots of prepositios need genitive case:
dank, trotz, fern, nördlich, während
And there are also prepositions which can go with dative or accusative, depending on the meaning:
auf, in, über, vor, zwischen
(Non of the lists is complete.)
I remember in first classes some sports activity to learn the prepositions for dative with a box and thus your list of prepositions would be dative only - as this site suggests I'm wrong :-o learn-german-smarter.com/learn-german-prepositions - so the location meanings goes to dative
– Shegit Brahm
yesterday
Just read through, thank you for the informative answer! It was of big help!
– Mun Wai
yesterday
1
@Shegit Brahm: No. Only for the nine dual-way prepositions dative means location while accusative means direction. For all other prepositions, it's arbitrary.
– Janka
yesterday
Nice list! The fact that "mit" und "ohne" ("with" and "without") require different grammatical cases can be confusing even for native speakers.
– Heinzi
yesterday
Just a note that the list of prepositions is not complete (von, gegen, auf ...).
– Peter A. Schneider
yesterday
|
show 2 more comments
The components of this sentence are:
ich
subject
personal pronoun, first person, singular, nominative casespreche
predicate
verb (a form of "sprechen"), first person, singular, present tensemit meinem Bruder
prepositional object
The verb sprechen (to speak, to talk) can have these kinds of objects:
accusative object
What are you speaking? (What is coming out of your mouth when you are speaking?) (Rare: Who are you speaking?)
Ich spreche deine Sprache. (I speak your language.)
Ich spreche nur den ersten Satz. (I speak only the first sentence.)
Ich spreche meinen Bruder.The last sentence is rare and can have two meanings:
- I will meet my brother and will have a conversation with him. You use this version often with an additional temporal adverb (»Morgen spreche ich meinen Bruder und da werden wir dann die weitere Vorgehensweise klären.« = Tomorrow I will meet my brother and then we will clarify the further course of action.) (This example also shows, that German Präsens can be future tense in English.)
- There is an audio drama about my brother, and in this drama I am speaking the role of my brother.
prepositional object with "über"
About who or what are you speaking? (What is the topic of the conversation?)
Ich spreche über das Wetter. (I talk about the weather.)
Ich spreche über das Auto. (I talk about the car.)
Ich spreche über meinen Bruder. (I talk about my brother.)prepositional object with "mit"
With whom are you talking? (Who is the other participant of the conversation?)
Ich spreche mit dem Lehrer. (I talk with the teacher.)
Ich spreche mit der Chefin. (I talk with the boss.)
Ich spreche mit meinem Bruder. (I talk with my brother.)
Note, that there are also prepositional objects with other predicates and that you also can have more of them in a sentence, like in this example (I put each prepositional object in square brackets):
»Der König spricht [während des Festes] [dank der neuen Technik] [durch ein Megaphon] [zu seinem Volk].« = The king speaks [during the festival] [thanks to the new technique] [through a megaphone] [to his people].
Prepositional objects consists of two parts. The first part is the preposition, and this preposition dictates the grammatical case of the second part:
mit (with)
always needs dative case
Ich tanze mit meiner Tante (I dance with my aunt.)
Er hat sie mit einem scharfen Messer erstochen. (He stabbed her with a sharp knife.)
Er übt mit großer Leidenschaft. (He practices with great passion.)
These are some frequently used prepositions that always need dative:
aus, bei, mit, nach, seit
But there are also prepositions that always need accusative:
durch, für, gegen, ohne, um
Lots of prepositios need genitive case:
dank, trotz, fern, nördlich, während
And there are also prepositions which can go with dative or accusative, depending on the meaning:
auf, in, über, vor, zwischen
(Non of the lists is complete.)
The components of this sentence are:
ich
subject
personal pronoun, first person, singular, nominative casespreche
predicate
verb (a form of "sprechen"), first person, singular, present tensemit meinem Bruder
prepositional object
The verb sprechen (to speak, to talk) can have these kinds of objects:
accusative object
What are you speaking? (What is coming out of your mouth when you are speaking?) (Rare: Who are you speaking?)
Ich spreche deine Sprache. (I speak your language.)
Ich spreche nur den ersten Satz. (I speak only the first sentence.)
Ich spreche meinen Bruder.The last sentence is rare and can have two meanings:
- I will meet my brother and will have a conversation with him. You use this version often with an additional temporal adverb (»Morgen spreche ich meinen Bruder und da werden wir dann die weitere Vorgehensweise klären.« = Tomorrow I will meet my brother and then we will clarify the further course of action.) (This example also shows, that German Präsens can be future tense in English.)
- There is an audio drama about my brother, and in this drama I am speaking the role of my brother.
prepositional object with "über"
About who or what are you speaking? (What is the topic of the conversation?)
Ich spreche über das Wetter. (I talk about the weather.)
Ich spreche über das Auto. (I talk about the car.)
Ich spreche über meinen Bruder. (I talk about my brother.)prepositional object with "mit"
With whom are you talking? (Who is the other participant of the conversation?)
Ich spreche mit dem Lehrer. (I talk with the teacher.)
Ich spreche mit der Chefin. (I talk with the boss.)
Ich spreche mit meinem Bruder. (I talk with my brother.)
Note, that there are also prepositional objects with other predicates and that you also can have more of them in a sentence, like in this example (I put each prepositional object in square brackets):
»Der König spricht [während des Festes] [dank der neuen Technik] [durch ein Megaphon] [zu seinem Volk].« = The king speaks [during the festival] [thanks to the new technique] [through a megaphone] [to his people].
Prepositional objects consists of two parts. The first part is the preposition, and this preposition dictates the grammatical case of the second part:
mit (with)
always needs dative case
Ich tanze mit meiner Tante (I dance with my aunt.)
Er hat sie mit einem scharfen Messer erstochen. (He stabbed her with a sharp knife.)
Er übt mit großer Leidenschaft. (He practices with great passion.)
These are some frequently used prepositions that always need dative:
aus, bei, mit, nach, seit
But there are also prepositions that always need accusative:
durch, für, gegen, ohne, um
Lots of prepositios need genitive case:
dank, trotz, fern, nördlich, während
And there are also prepositions which can go with dative or accusative, depending on the meaning:
auf, in, über, vor, zwischen
(Non of the lists is complete.)
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Hubert SchölnastHubert Schölnast
73.1k6109243
73.1k6109243
I remember in first classes some sports activity to learn the prepositions for dative with a box and thus your list of prepositions would be dative only - as this site suggests I'm wrong :-o learn-german-smarter.com/learn-german-prepositions - so the location meanings goes to dative
– Shegit Brahm
yesterday
Just read through, thank you for the informative answer! It was of big help!
– Mun Wai
yesterday
1
@Shegit Brahm: No. Only for the nine dual-way prepositions dative means location while accusative means direction. For all other prepositions, it's arbitrary.
– Janka
yesterday
Nice list! The fact that "mit" und "ohne" ("with" and "without") require different grammatical cases can be confusing even for native speakers.
– Heinzi
yesterday
Just a note that the list of prepositions is not complete (von, gegen, auf ...).
– Peter A. Schneider
yesterday
|
show 2 more comments
I remember in first classes some sports activity to learn the prepositions for dative with a box and thus your list of prepositions would be dative only - as this site suggests I'm wrong :-o learn-german-smarter.com/learn-german-prepositions - so the location meanings goes to dative
– Shegit Brahm
yesterday
Just read through, thank you for the informative answer! It was of big help!
– Mun Wai
yesterday
1
@Shegit Brahm: No. Only for the nine dual-way prepositions dative means location while accusative means direction. For all other prepositions, it's arbitrary.
– Janka
yesterday
Nice list! The fact that "mit" und "ohne" ("with" and "without") require different grammatical cases can be confusing even for native speakers.
– Heinzi
yesterday
Just a note that the list of prepositions is not complete (von, gegen, auf ...).
– Peter A. Schneider
yesterday
I remember in first classes some sports activity to learn the prepositions for dative with a box and thus your list of prepositions would be dative only - as this site suggests I'm wrong :-o learn-german-smarter.com/learn-german-prepositions - so the location meanings goes to dative
– Shegit Brahm
yesterday
I remember in first classes some sports activity to learn the prepositions for dative with a box and thus your list of prepositions would be dative only - as this site suggests I'm wrong :-o learn-german-smarter.com/learn-german-prepositions - so the location meanings goes to dative
– Shegit Brahm
yesterday
Just read through, thank you for the informative answer! It was of big help!
– Mun Wai
yesterday
Just read through, thank you for the informative answer! It was of big help!
– Mun Wai
yesterday
1
1
@Shegit Brahm: No. Only for the nine dual-way prepositions dative means location while accusative means direction. For all other prepositions, it's arbitrary.
– Janka
yesterday
@Shegit Brahm: No. Only for the nine dual-way prepositions dative means location while accusative means direction. For all other prepositions, it's arbitrary.
– Janka
yesterday
Nice list! The fact that "mit" und "ohne" ("with" and "without") require different grammatical cases can be confusing even for native speakers.
– Heinzi
yesterday
Nice list! The fact that "mit" und "ohne" ("with" and "without") require different grammatical cases can be confusing even for native speakers.
– Heinzi
yesterday
Just a note that the list of prepositions is not complete (von, gegen, auf ...).
– Peter A. Schneider
yesterday
Just a note that the list of prepositions is not complete (von, gegen, auf ...).
– Peter A. Schneider
yesterday
|
show 2 more comments
Mun Wai is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Mun Wai is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Mun Wai is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Mun Wai is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to German Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgerman.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f50248%2fdative-vs-accusative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
So some preposition will always follow either dative or accusation?
– Mun Wai
yesterday
1
@MunWai Exactly. "mit" is easy to learn. But, for example, why "think about X" means "denken an + Dativ", probably no one can say.
– peterh
yesterday
4
»Denken an« takes Akkusativ!
– Raketenolli
yesterday
6
"speaking directly to my brother" I think I know what the problem is. I bet someone told you about direct and indirect objects. Please forget this concept! It is misleading. It helps only in 90% of all sentences and is wrong in 10%. In German grammar the terms "direktes Objekt" and "indirektes Objekt" doesn't exists. Take any German grammar book and search for those terms: You won't find them. German has dative object, accusative objects, genitive objects, prepositional objects, and some also use the term "nominative object", but there is no direct object. Please forget it and ignore it.
– Hubert Schölnast
yesterday
1
@Raketenolli Well, "Denken an" can take the dative if the thinker was standing on top of the brother...
– RedSonja
yesterday