How is it possible to add a double into an ArrayList of Integer? (Java) The Next CEO of Stack OverflowJava generics type erasure: when and what happens?type erasure in implementation of ArrayList in JavaHow do I efficiently iterate over each entry in a Java Map?How do I call one constructor from another in Java?How do I read / convert an InputStream into a String in Java?When to use LinkedList over ArrayList in Java?How do I generate random integers within a specific range in Java?How do I determine whether an array contains a particular value in Java?How do I declare and initialize an array in Java?How to split a string in JavaConverting 'ArrayList<String> to 'String[]' in JavaHow do I convert a String to an int in Java?
Is wanting to ask what to write an indication that you need to change your story?
I want to delete every two lines after 3rd lines in file contain very large number of lines :
Easy to Read Palindrome Checker
Why doesn't UK go for the same deal Japan has with EU to resolve Brexit?
Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?
Why is information "lost" when it got into a black hole?
Why do airplanes bank sharply to the right after air-to-air refueling?
Is a distribution that is normal, but highly skewed considered Gaussian?
Prepend last line of stdin to entire stdin
Why did CATV standarize in 75 ohms and everyone else in 50?
Where do students learn to solve polynomial equations these days?
Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?
How many extra stops do monopods offer for tele photographs?
Running a General Election and the European Elections together
What steps are necessary to read a Modern SSD in Medieval Europe?
Should I tutor a student who I know has cheated on their homework?
Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it?
Solving system of ODEs with extra parameter
What is the purpose of the Evocation wizard's Potent Cantrip feature?
Won the lottery - how do I keep the money?
What flight has the highest ratio of time difference to flight time?
What was the first Unix version to run on a microcomputer?
Plot of histogram similar to output from @risk
Is micro rebar a better way to reinforce concrete than rebar?
How is it possible to add a double into an ArrayList of Integer? (Java)
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowJava generics type erasure: when and what happens?type erasure in implementation of ArrayList in JavaHow do I efficiently iterate over each entry in a Java Map?How do I call one constructor from another in Java?How do I read / convert an InputStream into a String in Java?When to use LinkedList over ArrayList in Java?How do I generate random integers within a specific range in Java?How do I determine whether an array contains a particular value in Java?How do I declare and initialize an array in Java?How to split a string in JavaConverting 'ArrayList<String> to 'String[]' in JavaHow do I convert a String to an int in Java?
I try to understand how is it possible to have a Double value into an ArrayList of Integer. The numList is an ArrayList of Integer, and the value from it is a Double.
This is the code:
package bounded.wildcards;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
public class GenericsDemo
public static void main(String[] args)
// Invariance Workaround
List<Integer> numList = new ArrayList<>();
GenericsDemo.invarianceWorkaround(numList);
System.out.println(numList);
static <T extends Number> void invarianceWorkaround(List<T> list)
T element = (T) new Double(23.3);
list.add(element);
This will compile and run without an error.
java generics arraylist
add a comment |
I try to understand how is it possible to have a Double value into an ArrayList of Integer. The numList is an ArrayList of Integer, and the value from it is a Double.
This is the code:
package bounded.wildcards;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
public class GenericsDemo
public static void main(String[] args)
// Invariance Workaround
List<Integer> numList = new ArrayList<>();
GenericsDemo.invarianceWorkaround(numList);
System.out.println(numList);
static <T extends Number> void invarianceWorkaround(List<T> list)
T element = (T) new Double(23.3);
list.add(element);
This will compile and run without an error.
java generics arraylist
2
Possible duplicate of type erasure in implementation of ArrayList in Java
– vaxquis
2 days ago
1
also, stackoverflow.com/questions/339699/… and many others... I think that someone can find an exact duplicate, but they are are extremely closely related.
– vaxquis
2 days ago
Thank you for the links, I know about type erasure and add cast, but I cannot understand how is it possible to have an ArrayList of Integer with this Double value in it. And there is no exception when I run it.
– gaby
2 days ago
1
@gabv you're contradicting yourself. If you knew about type erasure, you'd understand why you can add anything toArrayList<Double>at runtime... because the answer is because of type erasure. As such, it follows you must either not know about type erasure mechanism in Java or not understand it, which both mean you should learn more about it.
– vaxquis
yesterday
add a comment |
I try to understand how is it possible to have a Double value into an ArrayList of Integer. The numList is an ArrayList of Integer, and the value from it is a Double.
This is the code:
package bounded.wildcards;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
public class GenericsDemo
public static void main(String[] args)
// Invariance Workaround
List<Integer> numList = new ArrayList<>();
GenericsDemo.invarianceWorkaround(numList);
System.out.println(numList);
static <T extends Number> void invarianceWorkaround(List<T> list)
T element = (T) new Double(23.3);
list.add(element);
This will compile and run without an error.
java generics arraylist
I try to understand how is it possible to have a Double value into an ArrayList of Integer. The numList is an ArrayList of Integer, and the value from it is a Double.
This is the code:
package bounded.wildcards;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
public class GenericsDemo
public static void main(String[] args)
// Invariance Workaround
List<Integer> numList = new ArrayList<>();
GenericsDemo.invarianceWorkaround(numList);
System.out.println(numList);
static <T extends Number> void invarianceWorkaround(List<T> list)
T element = (T) new Double(23.3);
list.add(element);
This will compile and run without an error.
java generics arraylist
java generics arraylist
edited 2 days ago
gaby
asked 2 days ago
gabygaby
51912
51912
2
Possible duplicate of type erasure in implementation of ArrayList in Java
– vaxquis
2 days ago
1
also, stackoverflow.com/questions/339699/… and many others... I think that someone can find an exact duplicate, but they are are extremely closely related.
– vaxquis
2 days ago
Thank you for the links, I know about type erasure and add cast, but I cannot understand how is it possible to have an ArrayList of Integer with this Double value in it. And there is no exception when I run it.
– gaby
2 days ago
1
@gabv you're contradicting yourself. If you knew about type erasure, you'd understand why you can add anything toArrayList<Double>at runtime... because the answer is because of type erasure. As such, it follows you must either not know about type erasure mechanism in Java or not understand it, which both mean you should learn more about it.
– vaxquis
yesterday
add a comment |
2
Possible duplicate of type erasure in implementation of ArrayList in Java
– vaxquis
2 days ago
1
also, stackoverflow.com/questions/339699/… and many others... I think that someone can find an exact duplicate, but they are are extremely closely related.
– vaxquis
2 days ago
Thank you for the links, I know about type erasure and add cast, but I cannot understand how is it possible to have an ArrayList of Integer with this Double value in it. And there is no exception when I run it.
– gaby
2 days ago
1
@gabv you're contradicting yourself. If you knew about type erasure, you'd understand why you can add anything toArrayList<Double>at runtime... because the answer is because of type erasure. As such, it follows you must either not know about type erasure mechanism in Java or not understand it, which both mean you should learn more about it.
– vaxquis
yesterday
2
2
Possible duplicate of type erasure in implementation of ArrayList in Java
– vaxquis
2 days ago
Possible duplicate of type erasure in implementation of ArrayList in Java
– vaxquis
2 days ago
1
1
also, stackoverflow.com/questions/339699/… and many others... I think that someone can find an exact duplicate, but they are are extremely closely related.
– vaxquis
2 days ago
also, stackoverflow.com/questions/339699/… and many others... I think that someone can find an exact duplicate, but they are are extremely closely related.
– vaxquis
2 days ago
Thank you for the links, I know about type erasure and add cast, but I cannot understand how is it possible to have an ArrayList of Integer with this Double value in it. And there is no exception when I run it.
– gaby
2 days ago
Thank you for the links, I know about type erasure and add cast, but I cannot understand how is it possible to have an ArrayList of Integer with this Double value in it. And there is no exception when I run it.
– gaby
2 days ago
1
1
@gabv you're contradicting yourself. If you knew about type erasure, you'd understand why you can add anything to
ArrayList<Double> at runtime... because the answer is because of type erasure. As such, it follows you must either not know about type erasure mechanism in Java or not understand it, which both mean you should learn more about it.– vaxquis
yesterday
@gabv you're contradicting yourself. If you knew about type erasure, you'd understand why you can add anything to
ArrayList<Double> at runtime... because the answer is because of type erasure. As such, it follows you must either not know about type erasure mechanism in Java or not understand it, which both mean you should learn more about it.– vaxquis
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This is because of type erasure used with Java generics - the type checks are only performed at compile time for generic types, and the type info for generics is then erased, effectively turning List<Integer> into List<Object>.
My IDE warns you of an "Unchecked cast from Double to T". But the compiler couldn't be sure that your code is wrong, so it does not emit an error, just a warning.
Then at runtime, the type check is no longer present due to type erasure, so the code will run without error unless you perform some operation that fails due to incompatible runtime type. System.out.println() is not such operation.
If you change the print code to
Integer num = numList.get(0);
System.out.println(num);
this will now involve runtime type check and will therefore fail:
java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Double cannot be cast to java.lang.Integer
3
Note that aClassCastExceptionis emitted when one tries to do this:Integer i = numList.get(0).
– MC Emperor
2 days ago
@MCEmperor Thanks, added. I couldn't find a simple example to force type incompatibility - integer seems to basically have no meaningful methods that wouldn't either be static or already inNumber.
– Jiri Tousek
2 days ago
2
@JiriTousek You may be interested in Java is Unsound. Basically all java compilers will add cast checks in places to avoid issues because they know that the type system is broken.
– Giacomo Alzetta
2 days ago
effectively turning intoList<Number>notList<Object>because of upper bound isNumber. if its List<Object> then you can store String but you can't
– Akash Shah
2 days ago
@AkashShah I disagree:List<String> stringList = (List) numList; stringList.add("abc");. Lots of compiler warnings, but compiles and runs nevertheless.
– Jiri Tousek
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55396803%2fhow-is-it-possible-to-add-a-double-into-an-arraylist-of-integer-java%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is because of type erasure used with Java generics - the type checks are only performed at compile time for generic types, and the type info for generics is then erased, effectively turning List<Integer> into List<Object>.
My IDE warns you of an "Unchecked cast from Double to T". But the compiler couldn't be sure that your code is wrong, so it does not emit an error, just a warning.
Then at runtime, the type check is no longer present due to type erasure, so the code will run without error unless you perform some operation that fails due to incompatible runtime type. System.out.println() is not such operation.
If you change the print code to
Integer num = numList.get(0);
System.out.println(num);
this will now involve runtime type check and will therefore fail:
java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Double cannot be cast to java.lang.Integer
3
Note that aClassCastExceptionis emitted when one tries to do this:Integer i = numList.get(0).
– MC Emperor
2 days ago
@MCEmperor Thanks, added. I couldn't find a simple example to force type incompatibility - integer seems to basically have no meaningful methods that wouldn't either be static or already inNumber.
– Jiri Tousek
2 days ago
2
@JiriTousek You may be interested in Java is Unsound. Basically all java compilers will add cast checks in places to avoid issues because they know that the type system is broken.
– Giacomo Alzetta
2 days ago
effectively turning intoList<Number>notList<Object>because of upper bound isNumber. if its List<Object> then you can store String but you can't
– Akash Shah
2 days ago
@AkashShah I disagree:List<String> stringList = (List) numList; stringList.add("abc");. Lots of compiler warnings, but compiles and runs nevertheless.
– Jiri Tousek
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
This is because of type erasure used with Java generics - the type checks are only performed at compile time for generic types, and the type info for generics is then erased, effectively turning List<Integer> into List<Object>.
My IDE warns you of an "Unchecked cast from Double to T". But the compiler couldn't be sure that your code is wrong, so it does not emit an error, just a warning.
Then at runtime, the type check is no longer present due to type erasure, so the code will run without error unless you perform some operation that fails due to incompatible runtime type. System.out.println() is not such operation.
If you change the print code to
Integer num = numList.get(0);
System.out.println(num);
this will now involve runtime type check and will therefore fail:
java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Double cannot be cast to java.lang.Integer
3
Note that aClassCastExceptionis emitted when one tries to do this:Integer i = numList.get(0).
– MC Emperor
2 days ago
@MCEmperor Thanks, added. I couldn't find a simple example to force type incompatibility - integer seems to basically have no meaningful methods that wouldn't either be static or already inNumber.
– Jiri Tousek
2 days ago
2
@JiriTousek You may be interested in Java is Unsound. Basically all java compilers will add cast checks in places to avoid issues because they know that the type system is broken.
– Giacomo Alzetta
2 days ago
effectively turning intoList<Number>notList<Object>because of upper bound isNumber. if its List<Object> then you can store String but you can't
– Akash Shah
2 days ago
@AkashShah I disagree:List<String> stringList = (List) numList; stringList.add("abc");. Lots of compiler warnings, but compiles and runs nevertheless.
– Jiri Tousek
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
This is because of type erasure used with Java generics - the type checks are only performed at compile time for generic types, and the type info for generics is then erased, effectively turning List<Integer> into List<Object>.
My IDE warns you of an "Unchecked cast from Double to T". But the compiler couldn't be sure that your code is wrong, so it does not emit an error, just a warning.
Then at runtime, the type check is no longer present due to type erasure, so the code will run without error unless you perform some operation that fails due to incompatible runtime type. System.out.println() is not such operation.
If you change the print code to
Integer num = numList.get(0);
System.out.println(num);
this will now involve runtime type check and will therefore fail:
java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Double cannot be cast to java.lang.Integer
This is because of type erasure used with Java generics - the type checks are only performed at compile time for generic types, and the type info for generics is then erased, effectively turning List<Integer> into List<Object>.
My IDE warns you of an "Unchecked cast from Double to T". But the compiler couldn't be sure that your code is wrong, so it does not emit an error, just a warning.
Then at runtime, the type check is no longer present due to type erasure, so the code will run without error unless you perform some operation that fails due to incompatible runtime type. System.out.println() is not such operation.
If you change the print code to
Integer num = numList.get(0);
System.out.println(num);
this will now involve runtime type check and will therefore fail:
java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Double cannot be cast to java.lang.Integer
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
Jiri TousekJiri Tousek
10.5k52240
10.5k52240
3
Note that aClassCastExceptionis emitted when one tries to do this:Integer i = numList.get(0).
– MC Emperor
2 days ago
@MCEmperor Thanks, added. I couldn't find a simple example to force type incompatibility - integer seems to basically have no meaningful methods that wouldn't either be static or already inNumber.
– Jiri Tousek
2 days ago
2
@JiriTousek You may be interested in Java is Unsound. Basically all java compilers will add cast checks in places to avoid issues because they know that the type system is broken.
– Giacomo Alzetta
2 days ago
effectively turning intoList<Number>notList<Object>because of upper bound isNumber. if its List<Object> then you can store String but you can't
– Akash Shah
2 days ago
@AkashShah I disagree:List<String> stringList = (List) numList; stringList.add("abc");. Lots of compiler warnings, but compiles and runs nevertheless.
– Jiri Tousek
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
3
Note that aClassCastExceptionis emitted when one tries to do this:Integer i = numList.get(0).
– MC Emperor
2 days ago
@MCEmperor Thanks, added. I couldn't find a simple example to force type incompatibility - integer seems to basically have no meaningful methods that wouldn't either be static or already inNumber.
– Jiri Tousek
2 days ago
2
@JiriTousek You may be interested in Java is Unsound. Basically all java compilers will add cast checks in places to avoid issues because they know that the type system is broken.
– Giacomo Alzetta
2 days ago
effectively turning intoList<Number>notList<Object>because of upper bound isNumber. if its List<Object> then you can store String but you can't
– Akash Shah
2 days ago
@AkashShah I disagree:List<String> stringList = (List) numList; stringList.add("abc");. Lots of compiler warnings, but compiles and runs nevertheless.
– Jiri Tousek
yesterday
3
3
Note that a
ClassCastException is emitted when one tries to do this: Integer i = numList.get(0).– MC Emperor
2 days ago
Note that a
ClassCastException is emitted when one tries to do this: Integer i = numList.get(0).– MC Emperor
2 days ago
@MCEmperor Thanks, added. I couldn't find a simple example to force type incompatibility - integer seems to basically have no meaningful methods that wouldn't either be static or already in
Number.– Jiri Tousek
2 days ago
@MCEmperor Thanks, added. I couldn't find a simple example to force type incompatibility - integer seems to basically have no meaningful methods that wouldn't either be static or already in
Number.– Jiri Tousek
2 days ago
2
2
@JiriTousek You may be interested in Java is Unsound. Basically all java compilers will add cast checks in places to avoid issues because they know that the type system is broken.
– Giacomo Alzetta
2 days ago
@JiriTousek You may be interested in Java is Unsound. Basically all java compilers will add cast checks in places to avoid issues because they know that the type system is broken.
– Giacomo Alzetta
2 days ago
effectively turning into
List<Number> not List<Object> because of upper bound is Number. if its List<Object> then you can store String but you can't– Akash Shah
2 days ago
effectively turning into
List<Number> not List<Object> because of upper bound is Number. if its List<Object> then you can store String but you can't– Akash Shah
2 days ago
@AkashShah I disagree:
List<String> stringList = (List) numList; stringList.add("abc");. Lots of compiler warnings, but compiles and runs nevertheless.– Jiri Tousek
yesterday
@AkashShah I disagree:
List<String> stringList = (List) numList; stringList.add("abc");. Lots of compiler warnings, but compiles and runs nevertheless.– Jiri Tousek
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55396803%2fhow-is-it-possible-to-add-a-double-into-an-arraylist-of-integer-java%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Possible duplicate of type erasure in implementation of ArrayList in Java
– vaxquis
2 days ago
1
also, stackoverflow.com/questions/339699/… and many others... I think that someone can find an exact duplicate, but they are are extremely closely related.
– vaxquis
2 days ago
Thank you for the links, I know about type erasure and add cast, but I cannot understand how is it possible to have an ArrayList of Integer with this Double value in it. And there is no exception when I run it.
– gaby
2 days ago
1
@gabv you're contradicting yourself. If you knew about type erasure, you'd understand why you can add anything to
ArrayList<Double>at runtime... because the answer is because of type erasure. As such, it follows you must either not know about type erasure mechanism in Java or not understand it, which both mean you should learn more about it.– vaxquis
yesterday