How is it possible to add a double into an ArrayList of Integer? (Java) The Next CEO of Stack OverflowJava generics type erasure: when and what happens?type erasure in implementation of ArrayList in JavaHow do I efficiently iterate over each entry in a Java Map?How do I call one constructor from another in Java?How do I read / convert an InputStream into a String in Java?When to use LinkedList over ArrayList in Java?How do I generate random integers within a specific range in Java?How do I determine whether an array contains a particular value in Java?How do I declare and initialize an array in Java?How to split a string in JavaConverting 'ArrayList<String> to 'String[]' in JavaHow do I convert a String to an int in Java?

Is wanting to ask what to write an indication that you need to change your story?

I want to delete every two lines after 3rd lines in file contain very large number of lines :

Easy to Read Palindrome Checker

Why doesn't UK go for the same deal Japan has with EU to resolve Brexit?

Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?

Why is information "lost" when it got into a black hole?

Why do airplanes bank sharply to the right after air-to-air refueling?

Is a distribution that is normal, but highly skewed considered Gaussian?

Prepend last line of stdin to entire stdin

Why did CATV standarize in 75 ohms and everyone else in 50?

Where do students learn to solve polynomial equations these days?

Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?

How many extra stops do monopods offer for tele photographs?

Running a General Election and the European Elections together

What steps are necessary to read a Modern SSD in Medieval Europe?

Should I tutor a student who I know has cheated on their homework?

Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it?

Solving system of ODEs with extra parameter

What is the purpose of the Evocation wizard's Potent Cantrip feature?

Won the lottery - how do I keep the money?

What flight has the highest ratio of time difference to flight time?

What was the first Unix version to run on a microcomputer?

Plot of histogram similar to output from @risk

Is micro rebar a better way to reinforce concrete than rebar?



How is it possible to add a double into an ArrayList of Integer? (Java)



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowJava generics type erasure: when and what happens?type erasure in implementation of ArrayList in JavaHow do I efficiently iterate over each entry in a Java Map?How do I call one constructor from another in Java?How do I read / convert an InputStream into a String in Java?When to use LinkedList over ArrayList in Java?How do I generate random integers within a specific range in Java?How do I determine whether an array contains a particular value in Java?How do I declare and initialize an array in Java?How to split a string in JavaConverting 'ArrayList<String> to 'String[]' in JavaHow do I convert a String to an int in Java?










16















I try to understand how is it possible to have a Double value into an ArrayList of Integer. The numList is an ArrayList of Integer, and the value from it is a Double.



This is the code:



package bounded.wildcards;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;

public class GenericsDemo

public static void main(String[] args)
// Invariance Workaround
List<Integer> numList = new ArrayList<>();
GenericsDemo.invarianceWorkaround(numList);
System.out.println(numList);


static <T extends Number> void invarianceWorkaround(List<T> list)

T element = (T) new Double(23.3);
list.add(element);





This will compile and run without an error.










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Possible duplicate of type erasure in implementation of ArrayList in Java

    – vaxquis
    2 days ago






  • 1





    also, stackoverflow.com/questions/339699/… and many others... I think that someone can find an exact duplicate, but they are are extremely closely related.

    – vaxquis
    2 days ago











  • Thank you for the links, I know about type erasure and add cast, but I cannot understand how is it possible to have an ArrayList of Integer with this Double value in it. And there is no exception when I run it.

    – gaby
    2 days ago







  • 1





    @gabv you're contradicting yourself. If you knew about type erasure, you'd understand why you can add anything to ArrayList<Double> at runtime... because the answer is because of type erasure. As such, it follows you must either not know about type erasure mechanism in Java or not understand it, which both mean you should learn more about it.

    – vaxquis
    yesterday
















16















I try to understand how is it possible to have a Double value into an ArrayList of Integer. The numList is an ArrayList of Integer, and the value from it is a Double.



This is the code:



package bounded.wildcards;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;

public class GenericsDemo

public static void main(String[] args)
// Invariance Workaround
List<Integer> numList = new ArrayList<>();
GenericsDemo.invarianceWorkaround(numList);
System.out.println(numList);


static <T extends Number> void invarianceWorkaround(List<T> list)

T element = (T) new Double(23.3);
list.add(element);





This will compile and run without an error.










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Possible duplicate of type erasure in implementation of ArrayList in Java

    – vaxquis
    2 days ago






  • 1





    also, stackoverflow.com/questions/339699/… and many others... I think that someone can find an exact duplicate, but they are are extremely closely related.

    – vaxquis
    2 days ago











  • Thank you for the links, I know about type erasure and add cast, but I cannot understand how is it possible to have an ArrayList of Integer with this Double value in it. And there is no exception when I run it.

    – gaby
    2 days ago







  • 1





    @gabv you're contradicting yourself. If you knew about type erasure, you'd understand why you can add anything to ArrayList<Double> at runtime... because the answer is because of type erasure. As such, it follows you must either not know about type erasure mechanism in Java or not understand it, which both mean you should learn more about it.

    – vaxquis
    yesterday














16












16








16


2






I try to understand how is it possible to have a Double value into an ArrayList of Integer. The numList is an ArrayList of Integer, and the value from it is a Double.



This is the code:



package bounded.wildcards;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;

public class GenericsDemo

public static void main(String[] args)
// Invariance Workaround
List<Integer> numList = new ArrayList<>();
GenericsDemo.invarianceWorkaround(numList);
System.out.println(numList);


static <T extends Number> void invarianceWorkaround(List<T> list)

T element = (T) new Double(23.3);
list.add(element);





This will compile and run without an error.










share|improve this question
















I try to understand how is it possible to have a Double value into an ArrayList of Integer. The numList is an ArrayList of Integer, and the value from it is a Double.



This is the code:



package bounded.wildcards;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;

public class GenericsDemo

public static void main(String[] args)
// Invariance Workaround
List<Integer> numList = new ArrayList<>();
GenericsDemo.invarianceWorkaround(numList);
System.out.println(numList);


static <T extends Number> void invarianceWorkaround(List<T> list)

T element = (T) new Double(23.3);
list.add(element);





This will compile and run without an error.







java generics arraylist






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago







gaby

















asked 2 days ago









gabygaby

51912




51912







  • 2





    Possible duplicate of type erasure in implementation of ArrayList in Java

    – vaxquis
    2 days ago






  • 1





    also, stackoverflow.com/questions/339699/… and many others... I think that someone can find an exact duplicate, but they are are extremely closely related.

    – vaxquis
    2 days ago











  • Thank you for the links, I know about type erasure and add cast, but I cannot understand how is it possible to have an ArrayList of Integer with this Double value in it. And there is no exception when I run it.

    – gaby
    2 days ago







  • 1





    @gabv you're contradicting yourself. If you knew about type erasure, you'd understand why you can add anything to ArrayList<Double> at runtime... because the answer is because of type erasure. As such, it follows you must either not know about type erasure mechanism in Java or not understand it, which both mean you should learn more about it.

    – vaxquis
    yesterday













  • 2





    Possible duplicate of type erasure in implementation of ArrayList in Java

    – vaxquis
    2 days ago






  • 1





    also, stackoverflow.com/questions/339699/… and many others... I think that someone can find an exact duplicate, but they are are extremely closely related.

    – vaxquis
    2 days ago











  • Thank you for the links, I know about type erasure and add cast, but I cannot understand how is it possible to have an ArrayList of Integer with this Double value in it. And there is no exception when I run it.

    – gaby
    2 days ago







  • 1





    @gabv you're contradicting yourself. If you knew about type erasure, you'd understand why you can add anything to ArrayList<Double> at runtime... because the answer is because of type erasure. As such, it follows you must either not know about type erasure mechanism in Java or not understand it, which both mean you should learn more about it.

    – vaxquis
    yesterday








2




2





Possible duplicate of type erasure in implementation of ArrayList in Java

– vaxquis
2 days ago





Possible duplicate of type erasure in implementation of ArrayList in Java

– vaxquis
2 days ago




1




1





also, stackoverflow.com/questions/339699/… and many others... I think that someone can find an exact duplicate, but they are are extremely closely related.

– vaxquis
2 days ago





also, stackoverflow.com/questions/339699/… and many others... I think that someone can find an exact duplicate, but they are are extremely closely related.

– vaxquis
2 days ago













Thank you for the links, I know about type erasure and add cast, but I cannot understand how is it possible to have an ArrayList of Integer with this Double value in it. And there is no exception when I run it.

– gaby
2 days ago






Thank you for the links, I know about type erasure and add cast, but I cannot understand how is it possible to have an ArrayList of Integer with this Double value in it. And there is no exception when I run it.

– gaby
2 days ago





1




1





@gabv you're contradicting yourself. If you knew about type erasure, you'd understand why you can add anything to ArrayList<Double> at runtime... because the answer is because of type erasure. As such, it follows you must either not know about type erasure mechanism in Java or not understand it, which both mean you should learn more about it.

– vaxquis
yesterday






@gabv you're contradicting yourself. If you knew about type erasure, you'd understand why you can add anything to ArrayList<Double> at runtime... because the answer is because of type erasure. As such, it follows you must either not know about type erasure mechanism in Java or not understand it, which both mean you should learn more about it.

– vaxquis
yesterday













1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















20














This is because of type erasure used with Java generics - the type checks are only performed at compile time for generic types, and the type info for generics is then erased, effectively turning List<Integer> into List<Object>.



My IDE warns you of an "Unchecked cast from Double to T". But the compiler couldn't be sure that your code is wrong, so it does not emit an error, just a warning.



Then at runtime, the type check is no longer present due to type erasure, so the code will run without error unless you perform some operation that fails due to incompatible runtime type. System.out.println() is not such operation.




If you change the print code to



Integer num = numList.get(0);
System.out.println(num);


this will now involve runtime type check and will therefore fail:




java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Double cannot be cast to java.lang.Integer







share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    Note that a ClassCastException is emitted when one tries to do this: Integer i = numList.get(0).

    – MC Emperor
    2 days ago











  • @MCEmperor Thanks, added. I couldn't find a simple example to force type incompatibility - integer seems to basically have no meaningful methods that wouldn't either be static or already in Number.

    – Jiri Tousek
    2 days ago






  • 2





    @JiriTousek You may be interested in Java is Unsound. Basically all java compilers will add cast checks in places to avoid issues because they know that the type system is broken.

    – Giacomo Alzetta
    2 days ago











  • effectively turning into List<Number> not List<Object> because of upper bound is Number. if its List<Object> then you can store String but you can't

    – Akash Shah
    2 days ago












  • @AkashShah I disagree: List<String> stringList = (List) numList; stringList.add("abc");. Lots of compiler warnings, but compiles and runs nevertheless.

    – Jiri Tousek
    yesterday











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55396803%2fhow-is-it-possible-to-add-a-double-into-an-arraylist-of-integer-java%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









20














This is because of type erasure used with Java generics - the type checks are only performed at compile time for generic types, and the type info for generics is then erased, effectively turning List<Integer> into List<Object>.



My IDE warns you of an "Unchecked cast from Double to T". But the compiler couldn't be sure that your code is wrong, so it does not emit an error, just a warning.



Then at runtime, the type check is no longer present due to type erasure, so the code will run without error unless you perform some operation that fails due to incompatible runtime type. System.out.println() is not such operation.




If you change the print code to



Integer num = numList.get(0);
System.out.println(num);


this will now involve runtime type check and will therefore fail:




java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Double cannot be cast to java.lang.Integer







share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    Note that a ClassCastException is emitted when one tries to do this: Integer i = numList.get(0).

    – MC Emperor
    2 days ago











  • @MCEmperor Thanks, added. I couldn't find a simple example to force type incompatibility - integer seems to basically have no meaningful methods that wouldn't either be static or already in Number.

    – Jiri Tousek
    2 days ago






  • 2





    @JiriTousek You may be interested in Java is Unsound. Basically all java compilers will add cast checks in places to avoid issues because they know that the type system is broken.

    – Giacomo Alzetta
    2 days ago











  • effectively turning into List<Number> not List<Object> because of upper bound is Number. if its List<Object> then you can store String but you can't

    – Akash Shah
    2 days ago












  • @AkashShah I disagree: List<String> stringList = (List) numList; stringList.add("abc");. Lots of compiler warnings, but compiles and runs nevertheless.

    – Jiri Tousek
    yesterday















20














This is because of type erasure used with Java generics - the type checks are only performed at compile time for generic types, and the type info for generics is then erased, effectively turning List<Integer> into List<Object>.



My IDE warns you of an "Unchecked cast from Double to T". But the compiler couldn't be sure that your code is wrong, so it does not emit an error, just a warning.



Then at runtime, the type check is no longer present due to type erasure, so the code will run without error unless you perform some operation that fails due to incompatible runtime type. System.out.println() is not such operation.




If you change the print code to



Integer num = numList.get(0);
System.out.println(num);


this will now involve runtime type check and will therefore fail:




java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Double cannot be cast to java.lang.Integer







share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    Note that a ClassCastException is emitted when one tries to do this: Integer i = numList.get(0).

    – MC Emperor
    2 days ago











  • @MCEmperor Thanks, added. I couldn't find a simple example to force type incompatibility - integer seems to basically have no meaningful methods that wouldn't either be static or already in Number.

    – Jiri Tousek
    2 days ago






  • 2





    @JiriTousek You may be interested in Java is Unsound. Basically all java compilers will add cast checks in places to avoid issues because they know that the type system is broken.

    – Giacomo Alzetta
    2 days ago











  • effectively turning into List<Number> not List<Object> because of upper bound is Number. if its List<Object> then you can store String but you can't

    – Akash Shah
    2 days ago












  • @AkashShah I disagree: List<String> stringList = (List) numList; stringList.add("abc");. Lots of compiler warnings, but compiles and runs nevertheless.

    – Jiri Tousek
    yesterday













20












20








20







This is because of type erasure used with Java generics - the type checks are only performed at compile time for generic types, and the type info for generics is then erased, effectively turning List<Integer> into List<Object>.



My IDE warns you of an "Unchecked cast from Double to T". But the compiler couldn't be sure that your code is wrong, so it does not emit an error, just a warning.



Then at runtime, the type check is no longer present due to type erasure, so the code will run without error unless you perform some operation that fails due to incompatible runtime type. System.out.println() is not such operation.




If you change the print code to



Integer num = numList.get(0);
System.out.println(num);


this will now involve runtime type check and will therefore fail:




java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Double cannot be cast to java.lang.Integer







share|improve this answer















This is because of type erasure used with Java generics - the type checks are only performed at compile time for generic types, and the type info for generics is then erased, effectively turning List<Integer> into List<Object>.



My IDE warns you of an "Unchecked cast from Double to T". But the compiler couldn't be sure that your code is wrong, so it does not emit an error, just a warning.



Then at runtime, the type check is no longer present due to type erasure, so the code will run without error unless you perform some operation that fails due to incompatible runtime type. System.out.println() is not such operation.




If you change the print code to



Integer num = numList.get(0);
System.out.println(num);


this will now involve runtime type check and will therefore fail:




java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Double cannot be cast to java.lang.Integer








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 days ago

























answered 2 days ago









Jiri TousekJiri Tousek

10.5k52240




10.5k52240







  • 3





    Note that a ClassCastException is emitted when one tries to do this: Integer i = numList.get(0).

    – MC Emperor
    2 days ago











  • @MCEmperor Thanks, added. I couldn't find a simple example to force type incompatibility - integer seems to basically have no meaningful methods that wouldn't either be static or already in Number.

    – Jiri Tousek
    2 days ago






  • 2





    @JiriTousek You may be interested in Java is Unsound. Basically all java compilers will add cast checks in places to avoid issues because they know that the type system is broken.

    – Giacomo Alzetta
    2 days ago











  • effectively turning into List<Number> not List<Object> because of upper bound is Number. if its List<Object> then you can store String but you can't

    – Akash Shah
    2 days ago












  • @AkashShah I disagree: List<String> stringList = (List) numList; stringList.add("abc");. Lots of compiler warnings, but compiles and runs nevertheless.

    – Jiri Tousek
    yesterday












  • 3





    Note that a ClassCastException is emitted when one tries to do this: Integer i = numList.get(0).

    – MC Emperor
    2 days ago











  • @MCEmperor Thanks, added. I couldn't find a simple example to force type incompatibility - integer seems to basically have no meaningful methods that wouldn't either be static or already in Number.

    – Jiri Tousek
    2 days ago






  • 2





    @JiriTousek You may be interested in Java is Unsound. Basically all java compilers will add cast checks in places to avoid issues because they know that the type system is broken.

    – Giacomo Alzetta
    2 days ago











  • effectively turning into List<Number> not List<Object> because of upper bound is Number. if its List<Object> then you can store String but you can't

    – Akash Shah
    2 days ago












  • @AkashShah I disagree: List<String> stringList = (List) numList; stringList.add("abc");. Lots of compiler warnings, but compiles and runs nevertheless.

    – Jiri Tousek
    yesterday







3




3





Note that a ClassCastException is emitted when one tries to do this: Integer i = numList.get(0).

– MC Emperor
2 days ago





Note that a ClassCastException is emitted when one tries to do this: Integer i = numList.get(0).

– MC Emperor
2 days ago













@MCEmperor Thanks, added. I couldn't find a simple example to force type incompatibility - integer seems to basically have no meaningful methods that wouldn't either be static or already in Number.

– Jiri Tousek
2 days ago





@MCEmperor Thanks, added. I couldn't find a simple example to force type incompatibility - integer seems to basically have no meaningful methods that wouldn't either be static or already in Number.

– Jiri Tousek
2 days ago




2




2





@JiriTousek You may be interested in Java is Unsound. Basically all java compilers will add cast checks in places to avoid issues because they know that the type system is broken.

– Giacomo Alzetta
2 days ago





@JiriTousek You may be interested in Java is Unsound. Basically all java compilers will add cast checks in places to avoid issues because they know that the type system is broken.

– Giacomo Alzetta
2 days ago













effectively turning into List<Number> not List<Object> because of upper bound is Number. if its List<Object> then you can store String but you can't

– Akash Shah
2 days ago






effectively turning into List<Number> not List<Object> because of upper bound is Number. if its List<Object> then you can store String but you can't

– Akash Shah
2 days ago














@AkashShah I disagree: List<String> stringList = (List) numList; stringList.add("abc");. Lots of compiler warnings, but compiles and runs nevertheless.

– Jiri Tousek
yesterday





@AkashShah I disagree: List<String> stringList = (List) numList; stringList.add("abc");. Lots of compiler warnings, but compiles and runs nevertheless.

– Jiri Tousek
yesterday



















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55396803%2fhow-is-it-possible-to-add-a-double-into-an-arraylist-of-integer-java%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bulk add to cart function issuecart vs. mini cart issue … rwd themeRedirect Add to cart button to cart pageAdd to cart issue - Magento 2.1The requested Payment Method is not available When creating an orderM2: reason add-to-cart might not function in production modeAdd to cart issue in some android devicesMagento 2 - custom price can not add to subtotal and grand total after add to cartAdd to cart codeIssue with my cart module on pdp and cart pages, just keeps spinningBulk price and quantity update using rest api

БиармияSxpst500bh2ntaf! 3h2r