Can I replace a Shimano FC-MT500 26/36 crankset with a Shimano Ultegra FC-R8000 36/46 set? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow do I calculate the diameter of a chainring from the number of teeth?Can I use an “8 speed compatible” crank such as Shimano FC-2303 with a 7 speed Shimano MF-HG37 freewheel?SRAM x9 3x9 with a 10 speed Shimano SXL FC-M660 CranksetReplace crankset or cassette for better road performance on an MTB?Can I replace only the smallest cog on my rear cassette?Replacement crankset for Shimano SG B 52/39?Can I convert from a 52/42/30 crankset to 50/39/30?Larger sproket on a single speed crankset?50/34 vs 52/36 crankset for 11-32 cassette (shimano 105 5800FC)Crank Arm Compatibility - Shimano Ultegra 6800 and R8000Can not replace Shimano Octalink with 105 Crankset
Dominated convergence theorem - what sequence?
How to count occurrences of text in a file?
Why is my new battery behaving weirdly?
Which one is the true statement?
What does "Its cash flow is deeply negative" mean?
Is micro rebar a better way to reinforce concrete than rebar?
Why is quantifier elimination desirable for a given theory?
Unclear about dynamic binding
Are police here, aren't itthey?
Is a distribution that is normal, but highly skewed considered Gaussian?
Domestic-to-international connection at Orlando (MCO)
Why, when going from special to general relativity, do we just replace partial derivatives with covariant derivatives?
Axiom Schema vs Axiom
Prepend last line of stdin to entire stdin
Bartok - Syncopation (1): Meaning of notes in between Grand Staff
Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion?
Can MTA send mail via a relay without being told so?
What steps are necessary to read a Modern SSD in Medieval Europe?
INSERT to a table from a database to other (same SQL Server) using Dynamic SQL
Is there always a complete, orthogonal set of unitary matrices?
How to avoid supervisors with prejudiced views?
Powershell. How to parse gci Name?
Where do students learn to solve polynomial equations these days?
Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?
Can I replace a Shimano FC-MT500 26/36 crankset with a Shimano Ultegra FC-R8000 36/46 set?
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow do I calculate the diameter of a chainring from the number of teeth?Can I use an “8 speed compatible” crank such as Shimano FC-2303 with a 7 speed Shimano MF-HG37 freewheel?SRAM x9 3x9 with a 10 speed Shimano SXL FC-M660 CranksetReplace crankset or cassette for better road performance on an MTB?Can I replace only the smallest cog on my rear cassette?Replacement crankset for Shimano SG B 52/39?Can I convert from a 52/42/30 crankset to 50/39/30?Larger sproket on a single speed crankset?50/34 vs 52/36 crankset for 11-32 cassette (shimano 105 5800FC)Crank Arm Compatibility - Shimano Ultegra 6800 and R8000Can not replace Shimano Octalink with 105 Crankset
On my Kross Level 10.0 MTB (2x10) used mostly on dirt roads and pavement I find I never use 1-10 and seldom go below 15th but I need more top end speed. Wondering if the Ultegra would be a straight swap out?
Thanks!
shimano crankset
New contributor
add a comment |
On my Kross Level 10.0 MTB (2x10) used mostly on dirt roads and pavement I find I never use 1-10 and seldom go below 15th but I need more top end speed. Wondering if the Ultegra would be a straight swap out?
Thanks!
shimano crankset
New contributor
add a comment |
On my Kross Level 10.0 MTB (2x10) used mostly on dirt roads and pavement I find I never use 1-10 and seldom go below 15th but I need more top end speed. Wondering if the Ultegra would be a straight swap out?
Thanks!
shimano crankset
New contributor
On my Kross Level 10.0 MTB (2x10) used mostly on dirt roads and pavement I find I never use 1-10 and seldom go below 15th but I need more top end speed. Wondering if the Ultegra would be a straight swap out?
Thanks!
shimano crankset
shimano crankset
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 2 days ago
GaryRGaryR
111
111
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Unfortunately no, the Ultegra crankset is not compatible, nor is any other road Shimano crank designed for a Hollowtech II bottom bracket (assuming this is your bike).
The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. MTB ones fit in 68 or 73mm shells, using 2 2.5mm spacers on 68mm ones. Road BBs only fit in 68mm shells. MTB BBs are therefore 5mm wider than road ones. Road crank axles are 5mm shorter than MTB cranks, and are only long enough for road BBs.
If you have a 68mm BB shell you could put a road BB in it and fit a road crank but the chainline would be way off.
You could look for larger aftermarket chainrings in the Shimano asymmetric 4-bolt pattern, but you have to deal with chainring clearance issues Andrew Henle described in his answer.
The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. Doh! I forgot all about that!
– Andrew Henle
2 days ago
@Swifty kross.pl/en/2019/mtb-xc/level-10-0 says SM-BB52
– Argenti Apparatus
yesterday
Why yes it does. Google found me what must be last yrs model kross.pl/en/2018/mtb-xc/level-10-0
– Swifty
yesterday
@Swifty Chances are the OP does not have a `19 model and has a bike with the PF BB instead of threaded (MT500 crank works with either) but the general principle holds - road cranks have shorter axles.
– Argenti Apparatus
yesterday
Thank you, your link is my bike, 19' Level 10.0
– GaryR
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
Probably not.
Per How do I calculate the diameter of a chainring from the number of teeth? the difference in diameter of the 46-tooth chainring over the original 36-tooth chainring is going to be about 10 * 12.7 mm / 3.14159
or about 40 mm, so the difference in radius will be 20 mm, or about 0.8 inches.
That means your front derailleur would need to be quite a bit higher than it is now, so much so that the hanger probably won't be high enough, assuming a braze-on attachment.
So it probably won't work because of that, but you can measure how much space you have available to move the front derailleur higher to get a better idea, especially if you can measure how much space there is between the derailleur and the current crankset.
If, for example, there's 7 mm between the front derailleur and the current chainring, and there's only 5 mm of space left in the braze-on's slot to move the front derailleur higher, there won't be enough space for a chainring that has a 20 mm larger radius.
Also, the larger diameter of the inner chain ring might wind up hitting the chainstay. How much space is there?
All that does assume an identical chainline, too. If the R8000 crank places the chainrings farther out or closer in, that has to be accounted for, too. That can be really important for clearing the chainstay.
1
Thank you Andrew, I was hoping for an assortment of chainrings to be available but it isn't the case. I can live with it as-is, just know it could be better for my use. If I ever need to climb a tree with it I know the gearing is there!
– GaryR
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "126"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
GaryR is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbicycles.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f60019%2fcan-i-replace-a-shimano-fc-mt500-26-36-crankset-with-a-shimano-ultegra-fc-r8000%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Unfortunately no, the Ultegra crankset is not compatible, nor is any other road Shimano crank designed for a Hollowtech II bottom bracket (assuming this is your bike).
The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. MTB ones fit in 68 or 73mm shells, using 2 2.5mm spacers on 68mm ones. Road BBs only fit in 68mm shells. MTB BBs are therefore 5mm wider than road ones. Road crank axles are 5mm shorter than MTB cranks, and are only long enough for road BBs.
If you have a 68mm BB shell you could put a road BB in it and fit a road crank but the chainline would be way off.
You could look for larger aftermarket chainrings in the Shimano asymmetric 4-bolt pattern, but you have to deal with chainring clearance issues Andrew Henle described in his answer.
The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. Doh! I forgot all about that!
– Andrew Henle
2 days ago
@Swifty kross.pl/en/2019/mtb-xc/level-10-0 says SM-BB52
– Argenti Apparatus
yesterday
Why yes it does. Google found me what must be last yrs model kross.pl/en/2018/mtb-xc/level-10-0
– Swifty
yesterday
@Swifty Chances are the OP does not have a `19 model and has a bike with the PF BB instead of threaded (MT500 crank works with either) but the general principle holds - road cranks have shorter axles.
– Argenti Apparatus
yesterday
Thank you, your link is my bike, 19' Level 10.0
– GaryR
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
Unfortunately no, the Ultegra crankset is not compatible, nor is any other road Shimano crank designed for a Hollowtech II bottom bracket (assuming this is your bike).
The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. MTB ones fit in 68 or 73mm shells, using 2 2.5mm spacers on 68mm ones. Road BBs only fit in 68mm shells. MTB BBs are therefore 5mm wider than road ones. Road crank axles are 5mm shorter than MTB cranks, and are only long enough for road BBs.
If you have a 68mm BB shell you could put a road BB in it and fit a road crank but the chainline would be way off.
You could look for larger aftermarket chainrings in the Shimano asymmetric 4-bolt pattern, but you have to deal with chainring clearance issues Andrew Henle described in his answer.
The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. Doh! I forgot all about that!
– Andrew Henle
2 days ago
@Swifty kross.pl/en/2019/mtb-xc/level-10-0 says SM-BB52
– Argenti Apparatus
yesterday
Why yes it does. Google found me what must be last yrs model kross.pl/en/2018/mtb-xc/level-10-0
– Swifty
yesterday
@Swifty Chances are the OP does not have a `19 model and has a bike with the PF BB instead of threaded (MT500 crank works with either) but the general principle holds - road cranks have shorter axles.
– Argenti Apparatus
yesterday
Thank you, your link is my bike, 19' Level 10.0
– GaryR
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
Unfortunately no, the Ultegra crankset is not compatible, nor is any other road Shimano crank designed for a Hollowtech II bottom bracket (assuming this is your bike).
The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. MTB ones fit in 68 or 73mm shells, using 2 2.5mm spacers on 68mm ones. Road BBs only fit in 68mm shells. MTB BBs are therefore 5mm wider than road ones. Road crank axles are 5mm shorter than MTB cranks, and are only long enough for road BBs.
If you have a 68mm BB shell you could put a road BB in it and fit a road crank but the chainline would be way off.
You could look for larger aftermarket chainrings in the Shimano asymmetric 4-bolt pattern, but you have to deal with chainring clearance issues Andrew Henle described in his answer.
Unfortunately no, the Ultegra crankset is not compatible, nor is any other road Shimano crank designed for a Hollowtech II bottom bracket (assuming this is your bike).
The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. MTB ones fit in 68 or 73mm shells, using 2 2.5mm spacers on 68mm ones. Road BBs only fit in 68mm shells. MTB BBs are therefore 5mm wider than road ones. Road crank axles are 5mm shorter than MTB cranks, and are only long enough for road BBs.
If you have a 68mm BB shell you could put a road BB in it and fit a road crank but the chainline would be way off.
You could look for larger aftermarket chainrings in the Shimano asymmetric 4-bolt pattern, but you have to deal with chainring clearance issues Andrew Henle described in his answer.
edited yesterday
answered 2 days ago
Argenti ApparatusArgenti Apparatus
36.7k23891
36.7k23891
The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. Doh! I forgot all about that!
– Andrew Henle
2 days ago
@Swifty kross.pl/en/2019/mtb-xc/level-10-0 says SM-BB52
– Argenti Apparatus
yesterday
Why yes it does. Google found me what must be last yrs model kross.pl/en/2018/mtb-xc/level-10-0
– Swifty
yesterday
@Swifty Chances are the OP does not have a `19 model and has a bike with the PF BB instead of threaded (MT500 crank works with either) but the general principle holds - road cranks have shorter axles.
– Argenti Apparatus
yesterday
Thank you, your link is my bike, 19' Level 10.0
– GaryR
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. Doh! I forgot all about that!
– Andrew Henle
2 days ago
@Swifty kross.pl/en/2019/mtb-xc/level-10-0 says SM-BB52
– Argenti Apparatus
yesterday
Why yes it does. Google found me what must be last yrs model kross.pl/en/2018/mtb-xc/level-10-0
– Swifty
yesterday
@Swifty Chances are the OP does not have a `19 model and has a bike with the PF BB instead of threaded (MT500 crank works with either) but the general principle holds - road cranks have shorter axles.
– Argenti Apparatus
yesterday
Thank you, your link is my bike, 19' Level 10.0
– GaryR
yesterday
The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. Doh! I forgot all about that!
– Andrew Henle
2 days ago
The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. Doh! I forgot all about that!
– Andrew Henle
2 days ago
@Swifty kross.pl/en/2019/mtb-xc/level-10-0 says SM-BB52
– Argenti Apparatus
yesterday
@Swifty kross.pl/en/2019/mtb-xc/level-10-0 says SM-BB52
– Argenti Apparatus
yesterday
Why yes it does. Google found me what must be last yrs model kross.pl/en/2018/mtb-xc/level-10-0
– Swifty
yesterday
Why yes it does. Google found me what must be last yrs model kross.pl/en/2018/mtb-xc/level-10-0
– Swifty
yesterday
@Swifty Chances are the OP does not have a `19 model and has a bike with the PF BB instead of threaded (MT500 crank works with either) but the general principle holds - road cranks have shorter axles.
– Argenti Apparatus
yesterday
@Swifty Chances are the OP does not have a `19 model and has a bike with the PF BB instead of threaded (MT500 crank works with either) but the general principle holds - road cranks have shorter axles.
– Argenti Apparatus
yesterday
Thank you, your link is my bike, 19' Level 10.0
– GaryR
yesterday
Thank you, your link is my bike, 19' Level 10.0
– GaryR
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
Probably not.
Per How do I calculate the diameter of a chainring from the number of teeth? the difference in diameter of the 46-tooth chainring over the original 36-tooth chainring is going to be about 10 * 12.7 mm / 3.14159
or about 40 mm, so the difference in radius will be 20 mm, or about 0.8 inches.
That means your front derailleur would need to be quite a bit higher than it is now, so much so that the hanger probably won't be high enough, assuming a braze-on attachment.
So it probably won't work because of that, but you can measure how much space you have available to move the front derailleur higher to get a better idea, especially if you can measure how much space there is between the derailleur and the current crankset.
If, for example, there's 7 mm between the front derailleur and the current chainring, and there's only 5 mm of space left in the braze-on's slot to move the front derailleur higher, there won't be enough space for a chainring that has a 20 mm larger radius.
Also, the larger diameter of the inner chain ring might wind up hitting the chainstay. How much space is there?
All that does assume an identical chainline, too. If the R8000 crank places the chainrings farther out or closer in, that has to be accounted for, too. That can be really important for clearing the chainstay.
1
Thank you Andrew, I was hoping for an assortment of chainrings to be available but it isn't the case. I can live with it as-is, just know it could be better for my use. If I ever need to climb a tree with it I know the gearing is there!
– GaryR
yesterday
add a comment |
Probably not.
Per How do I calculate the diameter of a chainring from the number of teeth? the difference in diameter of the 46-tooth chainring over the original 36-tooth chainring is going to be about 10 * 12.7 mm / 3.14159
or about 40 mm, so the difference in radius will be 20 mm, or about 0.8 inches.
That means your front derailleur would need to be quite a bit higher than it is now, so much so that the hanger probably won't be high enough, assuming a braze-on attachment.
So it probably won't work because of that, but you can measure how much space you have available to move the front derailleur higher to get a better idea, especially if you can measure how much space there is between the derailleur and the current crankset.
If, for example, there's 7 mm between the front derailleur and the current chainring, and there's only 5 mm of space left in the braze-on's slot to move the front derailleur higher, there won't be enough space for a chainring that has a 20 mm larger radius.
Also, the larger diameter of the inner chain ring might wind up hitting the chainstay. How much space is there?
All that does assume an identical chainline, too. If the R8000 crank places the chainrings farther out or closer in, that has to be accounted for, too. That can be really important for clearing the chainstay.
1
Thank you Andrew, I was hoping for an assortment of chainrings to be available but it isn't the case. I can live with it as-is, just know it could be better for my use. If I ever need to climb a tree with it I know the gearing is there!
– GaryR
yesterday
add a comment |
Probably not.
Per How do I calculate the diameter of a chainring from the number of teeth? the difference in diameter of the 46-tooth chainring over the original 36-tooth chainring is going to be about 10 * 12.7 mm / 3.14159
or about 40 mm, so the difference in radius will be 20 mm, or about 0.8 inches.
That means your front derailleur would need to be quite a bit higher than it is now, so much so that the hanger probably won't be high enough, assuming a braze-on attachment.
So it probably won't work because of that, but you can measure how much space you have available to move the front derailleur higher to get a better idea, especially if you can measure how much space there is between the derailleur and the current crankset.
If, for example, there's 7 mm between the front derailleur and the current chainring, and there's only 5 mm of space left in the braze-on's slot to move the front derailleur higher, there won't be enough space for a chainring that has a 20 mm larger radius.
Also, the larger diameter of the inner chain ring might wind up hitting the chainstay. How much space is there?
All that does assume an identical chainline, too. If the R8000 crank places the chainrings farther out or closer in, that has to be accounted for, too. That can be really important for clearing the chainstay.
Probably not.
Per How do I calculate the diameter of a chainring from the number of teeth? the difference in diameter of the 46-tooth chainring over the original 36-tooth chainring is going to be about 10 * 12.7 mm / 3.14159
or about 40 mm, so the difference in radius will be 20 mm, or about 0.8 inches.
That means your front derailleur would need to be quite a bit higher than it is now, so much so that the hanger probably won't be high enough, assuming a braze-on attachment.
So it probably won't work because of that, but you can measure how much space you have available to move the front derailleur higher to get a better idea, especially if you can measure how much space there is between the derailleur and the current crankset.
If, for example, there's 7 mm between the front derailleur and the current chainring, and there's only 5 mm of space left in the braze-on's slot to move the front derailleur higher, there won't be enough space for a chainring that has a 20 mm larger radius.
Also, the larger diameter of the inner chain ring might wind up hitting the chainstay. How much space is there?
All that does assume an identical chainline, too. If the R8000 crank places the chainrings farther out or closer in, that has to be accounted for, too. That can be really important for clearing the chainstay.
answered 2 days ago
Andrew HenleAndrew Henle
2,648814
2,648814
1
Thank you Andrew, I was hoping for an assortment of chainrings to be available but it isn't the case. I can live with it as-is, just know it could be better for my use. If I ever need to climb a tree with it I know the gearing is there!
– GaryR
yesterday
add a comment |
1
Thank you Andrew, I was hoping for an assortment of chainrings to be available but it isn't the case. I can live with it as-is, just know it could be better for my use. If I ever need to climb a tree with it I know the gearing is there!
– GaryR
yesterday
1
1
Thank you Andrew, I was hoping for an assortment of chainrings to be available but it isn't the case. I can live with it as-is, just know it could be better for my use. If I ever need to climb a tree with it I know the gearing is there!
– GaryR
yesterday
Thank you Andrew, I was hoping for an assortment of chainrings to be available but it isn't the case. I can live with it as-is, just know it could be better for my use. If I ever need to climb a tree with it I know the gearing is there!
– GaryR
yesterday
add a comment |
GaryR is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
GaryR is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
GaryR is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
GaryR is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Bicycles Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbicycles.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f60019%2fcan-i-replace-a-shimano-fc-mt500-26-36-crankset-with-a-shimano-ultegra-fc-r8000%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown