What is meant by a M next to a roman numeral? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowUsing standard Roman numeral analysis how should 7th and 9th qualities be determined?Roman numeral notation for a suspended chord?Roman numeral chord notation in minor scale?Questions on writing a Roman-numeral analysisAnalyzing an unfamiliar Roman numeral analysis?Roman Numeral Chords with SlashWhat does this bold letter preceeded ny a roman numeral indicate?Origin of Roman Numeral AnalysisRoman numeral anaysis helpDoes flatting or sharping a roman numeral indicate modal mixture?Roman Numeral Treatment of Suspensions
Where does this common spurious transmission come from? Is there a quality difference?
Won the lottery - how do I keep the money?
Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?
How did people program for Consoles with multiple CPUs?
Is micro rebar a better way to reinforce concrete than rebar?
Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?
Where do students learn to solve polynomial equations these days?
Necessary condition on homology group for a set to be contractible
Find non-case sensitive string in a mixed list of elements?
Axiom Schema vs Axiom
Can we say or write : "No, it'sn't"?
When you upcast Blindness/Deafness, do all targets suffer the same effect?
Is it ever safe to open a suspicious HTML file (e.g. email attachment)?
Why does standard notation not preserve intervals (visually)
How to check if all elements of 1 list are in the *same quantity* and in any order, in the list2?
Bartok - Syncopation (1): Meaning of notes in between Grand Staff
How to edit “Name” property in GCI output?
Why, when going from special to general relativity, do we just replace partial derivatives with covariant derivatives?
Which one is the true statement?
Can I use the load factor to estimate the lift?
Why doesn't UK go for the same deal Japan has with EU to resolve Brexit?
Are police here, aren't itthey?
How to get from Geneva Airport to Metabief, Doubs, France by public transport?
Flying from Cape Town to England and return to another province
What is meant by a M next to a roman numeral?
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowUsing standard Roman numeral analysis how should 7th and 9th qualities be determined?Roman numeral notation for a suspended chord?Roman numeral chord notation in minor scale?Questions on writing a Roman-numeral analysisAnalyzing an unfamiliar Roman numeral analysis?Roman Numeral Chords with SlashWhat does this bold letter preceeded ny a roman numeral indicate?Origin of Roman Numeral AnalysisRoman numeral anaysis helpDoes flatting or sharping a roman numeral indicate modal mixture?Roman Numeral Treatment of Suspensions
That is, a I or V followed by an M in the superscript.
theory chords roman-numerals sevenths
add a comment |
That is, a I or V followed by an M in the superscript.
theory chords roman-numerals sevenths
3
(1) You put a capitol M in the text, but a lowercase m in the title (they would mean different things no matter what) Also, (2) can you provide a picture? There are a few different systems of notation, and it could mean several slightly different things.
– Ben I.
2 days ago
Frequently, upper case means major and lower case means minor. But in roman numeral notation, the case is usually in the roman numeral itself, so there's no need for an "m" to denote the quality of the third. That is,IV
means a major chord on the 4th scale degree andiv
means a minor chord on the same scale degree, whileGM
means G major (though simplyG
is more common) andGm
means G minor. The picture you've posted is puzzling.
– phoog
2 days ago
2
That symbol is new for me. What book/source did this come from?
– Michael Curtis
2 days ago
2
Could you give some more context? Where do you see this? What key is the piece in? What chords come before or after it?
– phoog
2 days ago
add a comment |
That is, a I or V followed by an M in the superscript.
theory chords roman-numerals sevenths
That is, a I or V followed by an M in the superscript.
theory chords roman-numerals sevenths
theory chords roman-numerals sevenths
edited 2 days ago
Shevliaskovic
20.7k1381172
20.7k1381172
asked 2 days ago
Nathan TibbittsNathan Tibbitts
908
908
3
(1) You put a capitol M in the text, but a lowercase m in the title (they would mean different things no matter what) Also, (2) can you provide a picture? There are a few different systems of notation, and it could mean several slightly different things.
– Ben I.
2 days ago
Frequently, upper case means major and lower case means minor. But in roman numeral notation, the case is usually in the roman numeral itself, so there's no need for an "m" to denote the quality of the third. That is,IV
means a major chord on the 4th scale degree andiv
means a minor chord on the same scale degree, whileGM
means G major (though simplyG
is more common) andGm
means G minor. The picture you've posted is puzzling.
– phoog
2 days ago
2
That symbol is new for me. What book/source did this come from?
– Michael Curtis
2 days ago
2
Could you give some more context? Where do you see this? What key is the piece in? What chords come before or after it?
– phoog
2 days ago
add a comment |
3
(1) You put a capitol M in the text, but a lowercase m in the title (they would mean different things no matter what) Also, (2) can you provide a picture? There are a few different systems of notation, and it could mean several slightly different things.
– Ben I.
2 days ago
Frequently, upper case means major and lower case means minor. But in roman numeral notation, the case is usually in the roman numeral itself, so there's no need for an "m" to denote the quality of the third. That is,IV
means a major chord on the 4th scale degree andiv
means a minor chord on the same scale degree, whileGM
means G major (though simplyG
is more common) andGm
means G minor. The picture you've posted is puzzling.
– phoog
2 days ago
2
That symbol is new for me. What book/source did this come from?
– Michael Curtis
2 days ago
2
Could you give some more context? Where do you see this? What key is the piece in? What chords come before or after it?
– phoog
2 days ago
3
3
(1) You put a capitol M in the text, but a lowercase m in the title (they would mean different things no matter what) Also, (2) can you provide a picture? There are a few different systems of notation, and it could mean several slightly different things.
– Ben I.
2 days ago
(1) You put a capitol M in the text, but a lowercase m in the title (they would mean different things no matter what) Also, (2) can you provide a picture? There are a few different systems of notation, and it could mean several slightly different things.
– Ben I.
2 days ago
Frequently, upper case means major and lower case means minor. But in roman numeral notation, the case is usually in the roman numeral itself, so there's no need for an "m" to denote the quality of the third. That is,
IV
means a major chord on the 4th scale degree and iv
means a minor chord on the same scale degree, while GM
means G major (though simply G
is more common) and Gm
means G minor. The picture you've posted is puzzling.– phoog
2 days ago
Frequently, upper case means major and lower case means minor. But in roman numeral notation, the case is usually in the roman numeral itself, so there's no need for an "m" to denote the quality of the third. That is,
IV
means a major chord on the 4th scale degree and iv
means a minor chord on the same scale degree, while GM
means G major (though simply G
is more common) and Gm
means G minor. The picture you've posted is puzzling.– phoog
2 days ago
2
2
That symbol is new for me. What book/source did this come from?
– Michael Curtis
2 days ago
That symbol is new for me. What book/source did this come from?
– Michael Curtis
2 days ago
2
2
Could you give some more context? Where do you see this? What key is the piece in? What chords come before or after it?
– phoog
2 days ago
Could you give some more context? Where do you see this? What key is the piece in? What chords come before or after it?
– phoog
2 days ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
This might simply be a not-so-good way to indicate that the chord is Major. I usually see this in some kind of off-beat music sheets, usually written by people that don't really know that the capital I indicates that the chord is major or just don't know how to notate the chord numerals.
I disagree that the M means means major 7th (as in Imaj7), because you can deduce that from the 4 2, which means that the chord has a seventh and is in the third inversion.
What is really common, and you might often see, is the lower case m, which means minor, as in Cm or C minor (or Im / im). People extend this writing as C M or C Major (or IM . I Major), but it's not as common. You might see it on some transcriptions of songs on the internet for instance. So amateur musicians might often blend these two together to create a chord name / Roman numeral hybrid.
add a comment |
In my experience, the most common usage is that this "M" signifies that this is a major seventh chord. (But note, as phoog states, that "maj" is the more common usage.)
This is necessary because something like a V7 assumes a minor seventh above the chordal root. As such, we have to clarify that this chord will be a major seventh quality.
Regarding diatonic seventh chords in a major key, this M will only be necessary above the I and IV chords. All other seventh chords either:
assume the minor seventh above the root (ii7, iii7, V7, vi7),
or explicitly tell you the quality of the seventh chord (like for vii°7).
In my experience the standard notation for a major seventh chord ismaj7
, as inIVmaj7
.
– phoog
2 days ago
@phoog You're right; my first sentence was worded strangely. Edit incoming!
– Richard
2 days ago
1
@MichaelCurtis It is redundant, assuming the chord is diatonic. But nevertheless some systems include these clarifications. It's really no different than clarifying "ø" for the vii7 chord in major.
– Richard
2 days ago
1
Adding to your major sevenths symbols, there's 'little triangle' - can't find a font for it though!
– Tim
2 days ago
1
Yes, this answer is Kostka/Payne usage (among other texts). The idea is that without an M, there would be no difference between the Roman Numeral symbols for dominant seventh and major seventh chords (since both would have an uppercase Roman numeral). There’s always debate about how specific Roman numerals have to be about qualities of chords, since some would prefer to just infer diatonic harmonies. The most extreme version of that is to not even bother with different cases at all. This notation is on the opposite side of that spectrum, being hyper-specific about quality.
– Pat Muchmore
yesterday
|
show 8 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "240"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82069%2fwhat-is-meant-by-a-m-next-to-a-roman-numeral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This might simply be a not-so-good way to indicate that the chord is Major. I usually see this in some kind of off-beat music sheets, usually written by people that don't really know that the capital I indicates that the chord is major or just don't know how to notate the chord numerals.
I disagree that the M means means major 7th (as in Imaj7), because you can deduce that from the 4 2, which means that the chord has a seventh and is in the third inversion.
What is really common, and you might often see, is the lower case m, which means minor, as in Cm or C minor (or Im / im). People extend this writing as C M or C Major (or IM . I Major), but it's not as common. You might see it on some transcriptions of songs on the internet for instance. So amateur musicians might often blend these two together to create a chord name / Roman numeral hybrid.
add a comment |
This might simply be a not-so-good way to indicate that the chord is Major. I usually see this in some kind of off-beat music sheets, usually written by people that don't really know that the capital I indicates that the chord is major or just don't know how to notate the chord numerals.
I disagree that the M means means major 7th (as in Imaj7), because you can deduce that from the 4 2, which means that the chord has a seventh and is in the third inversion.
What is really common, and you might often see, is the lower case m, which means minor, as in Cm or C minor (or Im / im). People extend this writing as C M or C Major (or IM . I Major), but it's not as common. You might see it on some transcriptions of songs on the internet for instance. So amateur musicians might often blend these two together to create a chord name / Roman numeral hybrid.
add a comment |
This might simply be a not-so-good way to indicate that the chord is Major. I usually see this in some kind of off-beat music sheets, usually written by people that don't really know that the capital I indicates that the chord is major or just don't know how to notate the chord numerals.
I disagree that the M means means major 7th (as in Imaj7), because you can deduce that from the 4 2, which means that the chord has a seventh and is in the third inversion.
What is really common, and you might often see, is the lower case m, which means minor, as in Cm or C minor (or Im / im). People extend this writing as C M or C Major (or IM . I Major), but it's not as common. You might see it on some transcriptions of songs on the internet for instance. So amateur musicians might often blend these two together to create a chord name / Roman numeral hybrid.
This might simply be a not-so-good way to indicate that the chord is Major. I usually see this in some kind of off-beat music sheets, usually written by people that don't really know that the capital I indicates that the chord is major or just don't know how to notate the chord numerals.
I disagree that the M means means major 7th (as in Imaj7), because you can deduce that from the 4 2, which means that the chord has a seventh and is in the third inversion.
What is really common, and you might often see, is the lower case m, which means minor, as in Cm or C minor (or Im / im). People extend this writing as C M or C Major (or IM . I Major), but it's not as common. You might see it on some transcriptions of songs on the internet for instance. So amateur musicians might often blend these two together to create a chord name / Roman numeral hybrid.
edited 2 days ago
psmears
1834
1834
answered 2 days ago
ShevliaskovicShevliaskovic
20.7k1381172
20.7k1381172
add a comment |
add a comment |
In my experience, the most common usage is that this "M" signifies that this is a major seventh chord. (But note, as phoog states, that "maj" is the more common usage.)
This is necessary because something like a V7 assumes a minor seventh above the chordal root. As such, we have to clarify that this chord will be a major seventh quality.
Regarding diatonic seventh chords in a major key, this M will only be necessary above the I and IV chords. All other seventh chords either:
assume the minor seventh above the root (ii7, iii7, V7, vi7),
or explicitly tell you the quality of the seventh chord (like for vii°7).
In my experience the standard notation for a major seventh chord ismaj7
, as inIVmaj7
.
– phoog
2 days ago
@phoog You're right; my first sentence was worded strangely. Edit incoming!
– Richard
2 days ago
1
@MichaelCurtis It is redundant, assuming the chord is diatonic. But nevertheless some systems include these clarifications. It's really no different than clarifying "ø" for the vii7 chord in major.
– Richard
2 days ago
1
Adding to your major sevenths symbols, there's 'little triangle' - can't find a font for it though!
– Tim
2 days ago
1
Yes, this answer is Kostka/Payne usage (among other texts). The idea is that without an M, there would be no difference between the Roman Numeral symbols for dominant seventh and major seventh chords (since both would have an uppercase Roman numeral). There’s always debate about how specific Roman numerals have to be about qualities of chords, since some would prefer to just infer diatonic harmonies. The most extreme version of that is to not even bother with different cases at all. This notation is on the opposite side of that spectrum, being hyper-specific about quality.
– Pat Muchmore
yesterday
|
show 8 more comments
In my experience, the most common usage is that this "M" signifies that this is a major seventh chord. (But note, as phoog states, that "maj" is the more common usage.)
This is necessary because something like a V7 assumes a minor seventh above the chordal root. As such, we have to clarify that this chord will be a major seventh quality.
Regarding diatonic seventh chords in a major key, this M will only be necessary above the I and IV chords. All other seventh chords either:
assume the minor seventh above the root (ii7, iii7, V7, vi7),
or explicitly tell you the quality of the seventh chord (like for vii°7).
In my experience the standard notation for a major seventh chord ismaj7
, as inIVmaj7
.
– phoog
2 days ago
@phoog You're right; my first sentence was worded strangely. Edit incoming!
– Richard
2 days ago
1
@MichaelCurtis It is redundant, assuming the chord is diatonic. But nevertheless some systems include these clarifications. It's really no different than clarifying "ø" for the vii7 chord in major.
– Richard
2 days ago
1
Adding to your major sevenths symbols, there's 'little triangle' - can't find a font for it though!
– Tim
2 days ago
1
Yes, this answer is Kostka/Payne usage (among other texts). The idea is that without an M, there would be no difference between the Roman Numeral symbols for dominant seventh and major seventh chords (since both would have an uppercase Roman numeral). There’s always debate about how specific Roman numerals have to be about qualities of chords, since some would prefer to just infer diatonic harmonies. The most extreme version of that is to not even bother with different cases at all. This notation is on the opposite side of that spectrum, being hyper-specific about quality.
– Pat Muchmore
yesterday
|
show 8 more comments
In my experience, the most common usage is that this "M" signifies that this is a major seventh chord. (But note, as phoog states, that "maj" is the more common usage.)
This is necessary because something like a V7 assumes a minor seventh above the chordal root. As such, we have to clarify that this chord will be a major seventh quality.
Regarding diatonic seventh chords in a major key, this M will only be necessary above the I and IV chords. All other seventh chords either:
assume the minor seventh above the root (ii7, iii7, V7, vi7),
or explicitly tell you the quality of the seventh chord (like for vii°7).
In my experience, the most common usage is that this "M" signifies that this is a major seventh chord. (But note, as phoog states, that "maj" is the more common usage.)
This is necessary because something like a V7 assumes a minor seventh above the chordal root. As such, we have to clarify that this chord will be a major seventh quality.
Regarding diatonic seventh chords in a major key, this M will only be necessary above the I and IV chords. All other seventh chords either:
assume the minor seventh above the root (ii7, iii7, V7, vi7),
or explicitly tell you the quality of the seventh chord (like for vii°7).
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
RichardRichard
44.3k7103188
44.3k7103188
In my experience the standard notation for a major seventh chord ismaj7
, as inIVmaj7
.
– phoog
2 days ago
@phoog You're right; my first sentence was worded strangely. Edit incoming!
– Richard
2 days ago
1
@MichaelCurtis It is redundant, assuming the chord is diatonic. But nevertheless some systems include these clarifications. It's really no different than clarifying "ø" for the vii7 chord in major.
– Richard
2 days ago
1
Adding to your major sevenths symbols, there's 'little triangle' - can't find a font for it though!
– Tim
2 days ago
1
Yes, this answer is Kostka/Payne usage (among other texts). The idea is that without an M, there would be no difference between the Roman Numeral symbols for dominant seventh and major seventh chords (since both would have an uppercase Roman numeral). There’s always debate about how specific Roman numerals have to be about qualities of chords, since some would prefer to just infer diatonic harmonies. The most extreme version of that is to not even bother with different cases at all. This notation is on the opposite side of that spectrum, being hyper-specific about quality.
– Pat Muchmore
yesterday
|
show 8 more comments
In my experience the standard notation for a major seventh chord ismaj7
, as inIVmaj7
.
– phoog
2 days ago
@phoog You're right; my first sentence was worded strangely. Edit incoming!
– Richard
2 days ago
1
@MichaelCurtis It is redundant, assuming the chord is diatonic. But nevertheless some systems include these clarifications. It's really no different than clarifying "ø" for the vii7 chord in major.
– Richard
2 days ago
1
Adding to your major sevenths symbols, there's 'little triangle' - can't find a font for it though!
– Tim
2 days ago
1
Yes, this answer is Kostka/Payne usage (among other texts). The idea is that without an M, there would be no difference between the Roman Numeral symbols for dominant seventh and major seventh chords (since both would have an uppercase Roman numeral). There’s always debate about how specific Roman numerals have to be about qualities of chords, since some would prefer to just infer diatonic harmonies. The most extreme version of that is to not even bother with different cases at all. This notation is on the opposite side of that spectrum, being hyper-specific about quality.
– Pat Muchmore
yesterday
In my experience the standard notation for a major seventh chord is
maj7
, as in IVmaj7
.– phoog
2 days ago
In my experience the standard notation for a major seventh chord is
maj7
, as in IVmaj7
.– phoog
2 days ago
@phoog You're right; my first sentence was worded strangely. Edit incoming!
– Richard
2 days ago
@phoog You're right; my first sentence was worded strangely. Edit incoming!
– Richard
2 days ago
1
1
@MichaelCurtis It is redundant, assuming the chord is diatonic. But nevertheless some systems include these clarifications. It's really no different than clarifying "ø" for the vii7 chord in major.
– Richard
2 days ago
@MichaelCurtis It is redundant, assuming the chord is diatonic. But nevertheless some systems include these clarifications. It's really no different than clarifying "ø" for the vii7 chord in major.
– Richard
2 days ago
1
1
Adding to your major sevenths symbols, there's 'little triangle' - can't find a font for it though!
– Tim
2 days ago
Adding to your major sevenths symbols, there's 'little triangle' - can't find a font for it though!
– Tim
2 days ago
1
1
Yes, this answer is Kostka/Payne usage (among other texts). The idea is that without an M, there would be no difference between the Roman Numeral symbols for dominant seventh and major seventh chords (since both would have an uppercase Roman numeral). There’s always debate about how specific Roman numerals have to be about qualities of chords, since some would prefer to just infer diatonic harmonies. The most extreme version of that is to not even bother with different cases at all. This notation is on the opposite side of that spectrum, being hyper-specific about quality.
– Pat Muchmore
yesterday
Yes, this answer is Kostka/Payne usage (among other texts). The idea is that without an M, there would be no difference between the Roman Numeral symbols for dominant seventh and major seventh chords (since both would have an uppercase Roman numeral). There’s always debate about how specific Roman numerals have to be about qualities of chords, since some would prefer to just infer diatonic harmonies. The most extreme version of that is to not even bother with different cases at all. This notation is on the opposite side of that spectrum, being hyper-specific about quality.
– Pat Muchmore
yesterday
|
show 8 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82069%2fwhat-is-meant-by-a-m-next-to-a-roman-numeral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
(1) You put a capitol M in the text, but a lowercase m in the title (they would mean different things no matter what) Also, (2) can you provide a picture? There are a few different systems of notation, and it could mean several slightly different things.
– Ben I.
2 days ago
Frequently, upper case means major and lower case means minor. But in roman numeral notation, the case is usually in the roman numeral itself, so there's no need for an "m" to denote the quality of the third. That is,
IV
means a major chord on the 4th scale degree andiv
means a minor chord on the same scale degree, whileGM
means G major (though simplyG
is more common) andGm
means G minor. The picture you've posted is puzzling.– phoog
2 days ago
2
That symbol is new for me. What book/source did this come from?
– Michael Curtis
2 days ago
2
Could you give some more context? Where do you see this? What key is the piece in? What chords come before or after it?
– phoog
2 days ago