Anatomically Correct Mesopelagic Aves The Next CEO of Stack OverflowPlanet of the Aves: AquabirdsAnatomically Correct HecatoncheiresAnatomically Correct MurlocsAnatomically correct furryAnatomically Correct AhuizotlAnatomically correct vampiresAnatomically correct akanameAnatomically Correct TrollsAnatomically correct ghoulsAnatomically correct GoronAnatomically correct radio communication
Why, when going from special to general relativity, do we just replace partial derivatives with covariant derivatives?
Running a General Election and the European Elections together
How to prove a simple equation?
Reference request: Grassmannian and Plucker coordinates in type B, C, D
Calculator final project in Python
Are police here, aren't itthey?
What was the first Unix version to run on a microcomputer?
What did we know about the Kessel run before the prequels?
Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?
Do I need to write [sic] when a number is less than 10 but isn't written out?
Why the difference in type-inference over the as-pattern in two similar function definitions?
Is it ever safe to open a suspicious HTML file (e.g. email attachment)?
Newlines in BSD sed vs gsed
Is a distribution that is normal, but highly skewed considered Gaussian?
A small doubt about the dominated convergence theorem
The past simple of "gaslight" – "gaslighted" or "gaslit"?
Can you be charged for obstruction for refusing to answer questions?
Is micro rebar a better way to reinforce concrete than rebar?
Proper way to express "He disappeared them"
Would a completely good Muggle be able to use a wand?
Does Germany produce more waste than the US?
How do I align (1) and (2)?
Why did CATV standarize in 75 ohms and everyone else in 50?
Should I tutor a student who I know has cheated on their homework?
Anatomically Correct Mesopelagic Aves
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowPlanet of the Aves: AquabirdsAnatomically Correct HecatoncheiresAnatomically Correct MurlocsAnatomically correct furryAnatomically Correct AhuizotlAnatomically correct vampiresAnatomically correct akanameAnatomically Correct TrollsAnatomically correct ghoulsAnatomically correct GoronAnatomically correct radio communication
$begingroup$
Recently I had a vision of a colossal underwater bird-like figure.
I would describe it as follows:
- Roughly the wingspan of the length of a blue whale
- Snow-white
- Typical shape and feathering of a bird of prey (I may have mistaken something else for feathers)
- Gliding into the depth, probably in the mesopelagic/twilight zone
Since such a creature couldn't possibly be an actual bird, unlike the aqua-bird, what is my giant mid-sea bird?
creature-design sea-creatures anatomically-correct
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Recently I had a vision of a colossal underwater bird-like figure.
I would describe it as follows:
- Roughly the wingspan of the length of a blue whale
- Snow-white
- Typical shape and feathering of a bird of prey (I may have mistaken something else for feathers)
- Gliding into the depth, probably in the mesopelagic/twilight zone
Since such a creature couldn't possibly be an actual bird, unlike the aqua-bird, what is my giant mid-sea bird?
creature-design sea-creatures anatomically-correct
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The wingspan of a blue whale... in the length or in the breadth of the whale?
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@L.Dutch The wingspan of the creature is roughly the length of a blue whale.
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@cobaltduck The light may have tricked my eye into thinking they were feathers...
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
"During the Late Eocene and the Early Oligocene (40–30 mya), some lineages of gigantic penguins existed. Nordenskjoeld's giant penguin (Anthropornis nordenskjoeldi) was the tallest, growing nearly 1.80 meters (5.9 feet) tall. The New Zealand giant penguin (Pachydyptes ponderosus) was probably the heaviest, weighing 80 kg or more. Both were found on New Zealand, the former also in the Antarctic farther eastwards." (Wikipedia, s.v. Pinguin)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@JBH I'm not sure, would it fit? The other entries of the anatomically correct series are 'real' creatures, whereas this is entire 'fictional' and 'unique'. If you deem it acceptable I will add it.
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Recently I had a vision of a colossal underwater bird-like figure.
I would describe it as follows:
- Roughly the wingspan of the length of a blue whale
- Snow-white
- Typical shape and feathering of a bird of prey (I may have mistaken something else for feathers)
- Gliding into the depth, probably in the mesopelagic/twilight zone
Since such a creature couldn't possibly be an actual bird, unlike the aqua-bird, what is my giant mid-sea bird?
creature-design sea-creatures anatomically-correct
$endgroup$
Recently I had a vision of a colossal underwater bird-like figure.
I would describe it as follows:
- Roughly the wingspan of the length of a blue whale
- Snow-white
- Typical shape and feathering of a bird of prey (I may have mistaken something else for feathers)
- Gliding into the depth, probably in the mesopelagic/twilight zone
Since such a creature couldn't possibly be an actual bird, unlike the aqua-bird, what is my giant mid-sea bird?
creature-design sea-creatures anatomically-correct
creature-design sea-creatures anatomically-correct
edited 2 days ago
A Lambent Eye
asked 2 days ago
A Lambent EyeA Lambent Eye
1,771732
1,771732
1
$begingroup$
The wingspan of a blue whale... in the length or in the breadth of the whale?
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@L.Dutch The wingspan of the creature is roughly the length of a blue whale.
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@cobaltduck The light may have tricked my eye into thinking they were feathers...
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
"During the Late Eocene and the Early Oligocene (40–30 mya), some lineages of gigantic penguins existed. Nordenskjoeld's giant penguin (Anthropornis nordenskjoeldi) was the tallest, growing nearly 1.80 meters (5.9 feet) tall. The New Zealand giant penguin (Pachydyptes ponderosus) was probably the heaviest, weighing 80 kg or more. Both were found on New Zealand, the former also in the Antarctic farther eastwards." (Wikipedia, s.v. Pinguin)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@JBH I'm not sure, would it fit? The other entries of the anatomically correct series are 'real' creatures, whereas this is entire 'fictional' and 'unique'. If you deem it acceptable I will add it.
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
1
$begingroup$
The wingspan of a blue whale... in the length or in the breadth of the whale?
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@L.Dutch The wingspan of the creature is roughly the length of a blue whale.
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@cobaltduck The light may have tricked my eye into thinking they were feathers...
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
"During the Late Eocene and the Early Oligocene (40–30 mya), some lineages of gigantic penguins existed. Nordenskjoeld's giant penguin (Anthropornis nordenskjoeldi) was the tallest, growing nearly 1.80 meters (5.9 feet) tall. The New Zealand giant penguin (Pachydyptes ponderosus) was probably the heaviest, weighing 80 kg or more. Both were found on New Zealand, the former also in the Antarctic farther eastwards." (Wikipedia, s.v. Pinguin)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@JBH I'm not sure, would it fit? The other entries of the anatomically correct series are 'real' creatures, whereas this is entire 'fictional' and 'unique'. If you deem it acceptable I will add it.
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
The wingspan of a blue whale... in the length or in the breadth of the whale?
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
2 days ago
$begingroup$
The wingspan of a blue whale... in the length or in the breadth of the whale?
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@L.Dutch The wingspan of the creature is roughly the length of a blue whale.
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@L.Dutch The wingspan of the creature is roughly the length of a blue whale.
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@cobaltduck The light may have tricked my eye into thinking they were feathers...
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@cobaltduck The light may have tricked my eye into thinking they were feathers...
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
2 days ago
2
2
$begingroup$
"During the Late Eocene and the Early Oligocene (40–30 mya), some lineages of gigantic penguins existed. Nordenskjoeld's giant penguin (Anthropornis nordenskjoeldi) was the tallest, growing nearly 1.80 meters (5.9 feet) tall. The New Zealand giant penguin (Pachydyptes ponderosus) was probably the heaviest, weighing 80 kg or more. Both were found on New Zealand, the former also in the Antarctic farther eastwards." (Wikipedia, s.v. Pinguin)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
2 days ago
$begingroup$
"During the Late Eocene and the Early Oligocene (40–30 mya), some lineages of gigantic penguins existed. Nordenskjoeld's giant penguin (Anthropornis nordenskjoeldi) was the tallest, growing nearly 1.80 meters (5.9 feet) tall. The New Zealand giant penguin (Pachydyptes ponderosus) was probably the heaviest, weighing 80 kg or more. Both were found on New Zealand, the former also in the Antarctic farther eastwards." (Wikipedia, s.v. Pinguin)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@JBH I'm not sure, would it fit? The other entries of the anatomically correct series are 'real' creatures, whereas this is entire 'fictional' and 'unique'. If you deem it acceptable I will add it.
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
yesterday
$begingroup$
@JBH I'm not sure, would it fit? The other entries of the anatomically correct series are 'real' creatures, whereas this is entire 'fictional' and 'unique'. If you deem it acceptable I will add it.
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let's start with something in the Real World (TM), then try to see whether we can manipulate its future evolution into your creature. The thing I have in mind is the humble gannet, birds of the Morus genus. As seen in this article at Media Drum World, when these birds feed, they spend quite a bit of time swimming to a bit of depth, and do so quite adeptly.
We begin with two-out-of-four of your features already in place: Snow-white, and typical shape and feathering of a bird of prey. We just need to figure out how to grow it much, much larger, and get it to abandon its life in the skies and greatly increase its diving depth. How? The usual evolutionary pressures: eat, don't get eaten, make more of your kind (i.e. sex).
As the fish dive deeper to escape, the mega-gannet must follow. But now the sharks, which already compete with the gannet at the bait ball, have a better chance to pick them off along side the fish. Time to get larger, too large for a shark to swallow. This will eventually make it too large to fly. Alongside this, the mega-gannet will probably become swifter at swimming. I'm uncertain whether the mega-gannet might develop a blubber layer, or if feathers can adapt to provide cold-water protection (penguins, for example, have both). Finally, those mega-gannet which are most successful at eating and not getting eaten will also be more successful at breeding, and these traits will augment in each generation.
Given the right circumstances and a few million years, anything can happen.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
change in bone density and muscular structure. The change in medium the bird moves through would require different physiological changes. Penguins and chickens have a higher bone density, so its not unheard of for that adaptation to occur in birds.
$endgroup$
– Sonvar
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's for sure the notorious Pinguinus Humongous.
It's a descendant from penguins, which, instead of feeding on small fishes, decided to go big and hunt for dolphins and other large sea mammals.
Its size is necessary for hunting those preys, and the feathers come from its ancestors being birds adapted to the sea environment.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Pinguinus, not Penguinus. And they are auks, not penguins. Otherwise it's fine. If you want penguins, that would likely be a descendant of Anthropornis, possibly Dinanthropornis colossicus.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Penguins don't tend to have a large wingspan, nor are the feathers particulary visible, or am I mistaken?
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
yesterday
$begingroup$
@ALambentEye, if you want to be streamlined underwater you cannot afford fluffy feathers and the resulting drag, especially if you rely on velocity to chase your meal
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Except for the feathers, your creature is rather like a manta ray: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manta_ray
So convergent evolution is your friend here. Just as the demands of hydrodynamics cause sharks, tuna, dolphins, and ichthyosaurs to all look much the same to a casual eye, your mesopelagic bird is descended from penguins that evolved into occupying the same environmental niche as manta.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Giant nudibranch.
source
These are ocean animals. They swim slowly along as I imagine your creature might. They can have a vaguely avian outline as seen here.
Known nudibranchs of course do not get to the size you want, but maybe they could. The molluscan body plan can scale up. Squids get big.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What an intersting creature! Why might it change colour and become larger, or what would cause it to do so?
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
1. Color - you could assert that default color for a mollusk is silvery white. Your creature is not trying to camouflage and it is not signaling to conspecifics with color so it is the default slug color 2. Something this big is probably a filter feeder like the whales and largest sharks. Size is an advantage for filter feeding and probably the bigger the better because you can filter more. An ancestor got into the filter feeding business and evolution scaled it up with time.
$endgroup$
– Willk
yesterday
$begingroup$
As regard the scaling up - the typical Blue Sea Angel is as long as a human finger is wide. From less than an inch (~25mm) to nearly a thousand inches (~80 feet, ~25m) is a lot of scaling. Not saying it's impossible, just making it clear the magnitude in question. (+1 by the way)
$endgroup$
– cobaltduck
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142680%2fanatomically-correct-mesopelagic-aves%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let's start with something in the Real World (TM), then try to see whether we can manipulate its future evolution into your creature. The thing I have in mind is the humble gannet, birds of the Morus genus. As seen in this article at Media Drum World, when these birds feed, they spend quite a bit of time swimming to a bit of depth, and do so quite adeptly.
We begin with two-out-of-four of your features already in place: Snow-white, and typical shape and feathering of a bird of prey. We just need to figure out how to grow it much, much larger, and get it to abandon its life in the skies and greatly increase its diving depth. How? The usual evolutionary pressures: eat, don't get eaten, make more of your kind (i.e. sex).
As the fish dive deeper to escape, the mega-gannet must follow. But now the sharks, which already compete with the gannet at the bait ball, have a better chance to pick them off along side the fish. Time to get larger, too large for a shark to swallow. This will eventually make it too large to fly. Alongside this, the mega-gannet will probably become swifter at swimming. I'm uncertain whether the mega-gannet might develop a blubber layer, or if feathers can adapt to provide cold-water protection (penguins, for example, have both). Finally, those mega-gannet which are most successful at eating and not getting eaten will also be more successful at breeding, and these traits will augment in each generation.
Given the right circumstances and a few million years, anything can happen.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
change in bone density and muscular structure. The change in medium the bird moves through would require different physiological changes. Penguins and chickens have a higher bone density, so its not unheard of for that adaptation to occur in birds.
$endgroup$
– Sonvar
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's start with something in the Real World (TM), then try to see whether we can manipulate its future evolution into your creature. The thing I have in mind is the humble gannet, birds of the Morus genus. As seen in this article at Media Drum World, when these birds feed, they spend quite a bit of time swimming to a bit of depth, and do so quite adeptly.
We begin with two-out-of-four of your features already in place: Snow-white, and typical shape and feathering of a bird of prey. We just need to figure out how to grow it much, much larger, and get it to abandon its life in the skies and greatly increase its diving depth. How? The usual evolutionary pressures: eat, don't get eaten, make more of your kind (i.e. sex).
As the fish dive deeper to escape, the mega-gannet must follow. But now the sharks, which already compete with the gannet at the bait ball, have a better chance to pick them off along side the fish. Time to get larger, too large for a shark to swallow. This will eventually make it too large to fly. Alongside this, the mega-gannet will probably become swifter at swimming. I'm uncertain whether the mega-gannet might develop a blubber layer, or if feathers can adapt to provide cold-water protection (penguins, for example, have both). Finally, those mega-gannet which are most successful at eating and not getting eaten will also be more successful at breeding, and these traits will augment in each generation.
Given the right circumstances and a few million years, anything can happen.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
change in bone density and muscular structure. The change in medium the bird moves through would require different physiological changes. Penguins and chickens have a higher bone density, so its not unheard of for that adaptation to occur in birds.
$endgroup$
– Sonvar
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let's start with something in the Real World (TM), then try to see whether we can manipulate its future evolution into your creature. The thing I have in mind is the humble gannet, birds of the Morus genus. As seen in this article at Media Drum World, when these birds feed, they spend quite a bit of time swimming to a bit of depth, and do so quite adeptly.
We begin with two-out-of-four of your features already in place: Snow-white, and typical shape and feathering of a bird of prey. We just need to figure out how to grow it much, much larger, and get it to abandon its life in the skies and greatly increase its diving depth. How? The usual evolutionary pressures: eat, don't get eaten, make more of your kind (i.e. sex).
As the fish dive deeper to escape, the mega-gannet must follow. But now the sharks, which already compete with the gannet at the bait ball, have a better chance to pick them off along side the fish. Time to get larger, too large for a shark to swallow. This will eventually make it too large to fly. Alongside this, the mega-gannet will probably become swifter at swimming. I'm uncertain whether the mega-gannet might develop a blubber layer, or if feathers can adapt to provide cold-water protection (penguins, for example, have both). Finally, those mega-gannet which are most successful at eating and not getting eaten will also be more successful at breeding, and these traits will augment in each generation.
Given the right circumstances and a few million years, anything can happen.
$endgroup$
Let's start with something in the Real World (TM), then try to see whether we can manipulate its future evolution into your creature. The thing I have in mind is the humble gannet, birds of the Morus genus. As seen in this article at Media Drum World, when these birds feed, they spend quite a bit of time swimming to a bit of depth, and do so quite adeptly.
We begin with two-out-of-four of your features already in place: Snow-white, and typical shape and feathering of a bird of prey. We just need to figure out how to grow it much, much larger, and get it to abandon its life in the skies and greatly increase its diving depth. How? The usual evolutionary pressures: eat, don't get eaten, make more of your kind (i.e. sex).
As the fish dive deeper to escape, the mega-gannet must follow. But now the sharks, which already compete with the gannet at the bait ball, have a better chance to pick them off along side the fish. Time to get larger, too large for a shark to swallow. This will eventually make it too large to fly. Alongside this, the mega-gannet will probably become swifter at swimming. I'm uncertain whether the mega-gannet might develop a blubber layer, or if feathers can adapt to provide cold-water protection (penguins, for example, have both). Finally, those mega-gannet which are most successful at eating and not getting eaten will also be more successful at breeding, and these traits will augment in each generation.
Given the right circumstances and a few million years, anything can happen.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
cobaltduckcobaltduck
7,5962150
7,5962150
1
$begingroup$
change in bone density and muscular structure. The change in medium the bird moves through would require different physiological changes. Penguins and chickens have a higher bone density, so its not unheard of for that adaptation to occur in birds.
$endgroup$
– Sonvar
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
change in bone density and muscular structure. The change in medium the bird moves through would require different physiological changes. Penguins and chickens have a higher bone density, so its not unheard of for that adaptation to occur in birds.
$endgroup$
– Sonvar
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
change in bone density and muscular structure. The change in medium the bird moves through would require different physiological changes. Penguins and chickens have a higher bone density, so its not unheard of for that adaptation to occur in birds.
$endgroup$
– Sonvar
2 days ago
$begingroup$
change in bone density and muscular structure. The change in medium the bird moves through would require different physiological changes. Penguins and chickens have a higher bone density, so its not unheard of for that adaptation to occur in birds.
$endgroup$
– Sonvar
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's for sure the notorious Pinguinus Humongous.
It's a descendant from penguins, which, instead of feeding on small fishes, decided to go big and hunt for dolphins and other large sea mammals.
Its size is necessary for hunting those preys, and the feathers come from its ancestors being birds adapted to the sea environment.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Pinguinus, not Penguinus. And they are auks, not penguins. Otherwise it's fine. If you want penguins, that would likely be a descendant of Anthropornis, possibly Dinanthropornis colossicus.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Penguins don't tend to have a large wingspan, nor are the feathers particulary visible, or am I mistaken?
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
yesterday
$begingroup$
@ALambentEye, if you want to be streamlined underwater you cannot afford fluffy feathers and the resulting drag, especially if you rely on velocity to chase your meal
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's for sure the notorious Pinguinus Humongous.
It's a descendant from penguins, which, instead of feeding on small fishes, decided to go big and hunt for dolphins and other large sea mammals.
Its size is necessary for hunting those preys, and the feathers come from its ancestors being birds adapted to the sea environment.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Pinguinus, not Penguinus. And they are auks, not penguins. Otherwise it's fine. If you want penguins, that would likely be a descendant of Anthropornis, possibly Dinanthropornis colossicus.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Penguins don't tend to have a large wingspan, nor are the feathers particulary visible, or am I mistaken?
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
yesterday
$begingroup$
@ALambentEye, if you want to be streamlined underwater you cannot afford fluffy feathers and the resulting drag, especially if you rely on velocity to chase your meal
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's for sure the notorious Pinguinus Humongous.
It's a descendant from penguins, which, instead of feeding on small fishes, decided to go big and hunt for dolphins and other large sea mammals.
Its size is necessary for hunting those preys, and the feathers come from its ancestors being birds adapted to the sea environment.
$endgroup$
It's for sure the notorious Pinguinus Humongous.
It's a descendant from penguins, which, instead of feeding on small fishes, decided to go big and hunt for dolphins and other large sea mammals.
Its size is necessary for hunting those preys, and the feathers come from its ancestors being birds adapted to the sea environment.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
L.Dutch♦L.Dutch
89.4k29208434
89.4k29208434
1
$begingroup$
Pinguinus, not Penguinus. And they are auks, not penguins. Otherwise it's fine. If you want penguins, that would likely be a descendant of Anthropornis, possibly Dinanthropornis colossicus.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Penguins don't tend to have a large wingspan, nor are the feathers particulary visible, or am I mistaken?
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
yesterday
$begingroup$
@ALambentEye, if you want to be streamlined underwater you cannot afford fluffy feathers and the resulting drag, especially if you rely on velocity to chase your meal
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
yesterday
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Pinguinus, not Penguinus. And they are auks, not penguins. Otherwise it's fine. If you want penguins, that would likely be a descendant of Anthropornis, possibly Dinanthropornis colossicus.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Penguins don't tend to have a large wingspan, nor are the feathers particulary visible, or am I mistaken?
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
yesterday
$begingroup$
@ALambentEye, if you want to be streamlined underwater you cannot afford fluffy feathers and the resulting drag, especially if you rely on velocity to chase your meal
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
Pinguinus, not Penguinus. And they are auks, not penguins. Otherwise it's fine. If you want penguins, that would likely be a descendant of Anthropornis, possibly Dinanthropornis colossicus.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Pinguinus, not Penguinus. And they are auks, not penguins. Otherwise it's fine. If you want penguins, that would likely be a descendant of Anthropornis, possibly Dinanthropornis colossicus.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Penguins don't tend to have a large wingspan, nor are the feathers particulary visible, or am I mistaken?
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
yesterday
$begingroup$
Penguins don't tend to have a large wingspan, nor are the feathers particulary visible, or am I mistaken?
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
yesterday
$begingroup$
@ALambentEye, if you want to be streamlined underwater you cannot afford fluffy feathers and the resulting drag, especially if you rely on velocity to chase your meal
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
yesterday
$begingroup$
@ALambentEye, if you want to be streamlined underwater you cannot afford fluffy feathers and the resulting drag, especially if you rely on velocity to chase your meal
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Except for the feathers, your creature is rather like a manta ray: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manta_ray
So convergent evolution is your friend here. Just as the demands of hydrodynamics cause sharks, tuna, dolphins, and ichthyosaurs to all look much the same to a casual eye, your mesopelagic bird is descended from penguins that evolved into occupying the same environmental niche as manta.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Except for the feathers, your creature is rather like a manta ray: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manta_ray
So convergent evolution is your friend here. Just as the demands of hydrodynamics cause sharks, tuna, dolphins, and ichthyosaurs to all look much the same to a casual eye, your mesopelagic bird is descended from penguins that evolved into occupying the same environmental niche as manta.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Except for the feathers, your creature is rather like a manta ray: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manta_ray
So convergent evolution is your friend here. Just as the demands of hydrodynamics cause sharks, tuna, dolphins, and ichthyosaurs to all look much the same to a casual eye, your mesopelagic bird is descended from penguins that evolved into occupying the same environmental niche as manta.
$endgroup$
Except for the feathers, your creature is rather like a manta ray: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manta_ray
So convergent evolution is your friend here. Just as the demands of hydrodynamics cause sharks, tuna, dolphins, and ichthyosaurs to all look much the same to a casual eye, your mesopelagic bird is descended from penguins that evolved into occupying the same environmental niche as manta.
answered 2 days ago
jamesqfjamesqf
10.4k11937
10.4k11937
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Giant nudibranch.
source
These are ocean animals. They swim slowly along as I imagine your creature might. They can have a vaguely avian outline as seen here.
Known nudibranchs of course do not get to the size you want, but maybe they could. The molluscan body plan can scale up. Squids get big.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What an intersting creature! Why might it change colour and become larger, or what would cause it to do so?
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
1. Color - you could assert that default color for a mollusk is silvery white. Your creature is not trying to camouflage and it is not signaling to conspecifics with color so it is the default slug color 2. Something this big is probably a filter feeder like the whales and largest sharks. Size is an advantage for filter feeding and probably the bigger the better because you can filter more. An ancestor got into the filter feeding business and evolution scaled it up with time.
$endgroup$
– Willk
yesterday
$begingroup$
As regard the scaling up - the typical Blue Sea Angel is as long as a human finger is wide. From less than an inch (~25mm) to nearly a thousand inches (~80 feet, ~25m) is a lot of scaling. Not saying it's impossible, just making it clear the magnitude in question. (+1 by the way)
$endgroup$
– cobaltduck
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Giant nudibranch.
source
These are ocean animals. They swim slowly along as I imagine your creature might. They can have a vaguely avian outline as seen here.
Known nudibranchs of course do not get to the size you want, but maybe they could. The molluscan body plan can scale up. Squids get big.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What an intersting creature! Why might it change colour and become larger, or what would cause it to do so?
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
1. Color - you could assert that default color for a mollusk is silvery white. Your creature is not trying to camouflage and it is not signaling to conspecifics with color so it is the default slug color 2. Something this big is probably a filter feeder like the whales and largest sharks. Size is an advantage for filter feeding and probably the bigger the better because you can filter more. An ancestor got into the filter feeding business and evolution scaled it up with time.
$endgroup$
– Willk
yesterday
$begingroup$
As regard the scaling up - the typical Blue Sea Angel is as long as a human finger is wide. From less than an inch (~25mm) to nearly a thousand inches (~80 feet, ~25m) is a lot of scaling. Not saying it's impossible, just making it clear the magnitude in question. (+1 by the way)
$endgroup$
– cobaltduck
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Giant nudibranch.
source
These are ocean animals. They swim slowly along as I imagine your creature might. They can have a vaguely avian outline as seen here.
Known nudibranchs of course do not get to the size you want, but maybe they could. The molluscan body plan can scale up. Squids get big.
$endgroup$
Giant nudibranch.
source
These are ocean animals. They swim slowly along as I imagine your creature might. They can have a vaguely avian outline as seen here.
Known nudibranchs of course do not get to the size you want, but maybe they could. The molluscan body plan can scale up. Squids get big.
answered 2 days ago
WillkWillk
115k27218483
115k27218483
$begingroup$
What an intersting creature! Why might it change colour and become larger, or what would cause it to do so?
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
1. Color - you could assert that default color for a mollusk is silvery white. Your creature is not trying to camouflage and it is not signaling to conspecifics with color so it is the default slug color 2. Something this big is probably a filter feeder like the whales and largest sharks. Size is an advantage for filter feeding and probably the bigger the better because you can filter more. An ancestor got into the filter feeding business and evolution scaled it up with time.
$endgroup$
– Willk
yesterday
$begingroup$
As regard the scaling up - the typical Blue Sea Angel is as long as a human finger is wide. From less than an inch (~25mm) to nearly a thousand inches (~80 feet, ~25m) is a lot of scaling. Not saying it's impossible, just making it clear the magnitude in question. (+1 by the way)
$endgroup$
– cobaltduck
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What an intersting creature! Why might it change colour and become larger, or what would cause it to do so?
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
1. Color - you could assert that default color for a mollusk is silvery white. Your creature is not trying to camouflage and it is not signaling to conspecifics with color so it is the default slug color 2. Something this big is probably a filter feeder like the whales and largest sharks. Size is an advantage for filter feeding and probably the bigger the better because you can filter more. An ancestor got into the filter feeding business and evolution scaled it up with time.
$endgroup$
– Willk
yesterday
$begingroup$
As regard the scaling up - the typical Blue Sea Angel is as long as a human finger is wide. From less than an inch (~25mm) to nearly a thousand inches (~80 feet, ~25m) is a lot of scaling. Not saying it's impossible, just making it clear the magnitude in question. (+1 by the way)
$endgroup$
– cobaltduck
yesterday
$begingroup$
What an intersting creature! Why might it change colour and become larger, or what would cause it to do so?
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
yesterday
$begingroup$
What an intersting creature! Why might it change colour and become larger, or what would cause it to do so?
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
1. Color - you could assert that default color for a mollusk is silvery white. Your creature is not trying to camouflage and it is not signaling to conspecifics with color so it is the default slug color 2. Something this big is probably a filter feeder like the whales and largest sharks. Size is an advantage for filter feeding and probably the bigger the better because you can filter more. An ancestor got into the filter feeding business and evolution scaled it up with time.
$endgroup$
– Willk
yesterday
$begingroup$
1. Color - you could assert that default color for a mollusk is silvery white. Your creature is not trying to camouflage and it is not signaling to conspecifics with color so it is the default slug color 2. Something this big is probably a filter feeder like the whales and largest sharks. Size is an advantage for filter feeding and probably the bigger the better because you can filter more. An ancestor got into the filter feeding business and evolution scaled it up with time.
$endgroup$
– Willk
yesterday
$begingroup$
As regard the scaling up - the typical Blue Sea Angel is as long as a human finger is wide. From less than an inch (~25mm) to nearly a thousand inches (~80 feet, ~25m) is a lot of scaling. Not saying it's impossible, just making it clear the magnitude in question. (+1 by the way)
$endgroup$
– cobaltduck
yesterday
$begingroup$
As regard the scaling up - the typical Blue Sea Angel is as long as a human finger is wide. From less than an inch (~25mm) to nearly a thousand inches (~80 feet, ~25m) is a lot of scaling. Not saying it's impossible, just making it clear the magnitude in question. (+1 by the way)
$endgroup$
– cobaltduck
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142680%2fanatomically-correct-mesopelagic-aves%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
The wingspan of a blue whale... in the length or in the breadth of the whale?
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch♦
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@L.Dutch The wingspan of the creature is roughly the length of a blue whale.
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@cobaltduck The light may have tricked my eye into thinking they were feathers...
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
"During the Late Eocene and the Early Oligocene (40–30 mya), some lineages of gigantic penguins existed. Nordenskjoeld's giant penguin (Anthropornis nordenskjoeldi) was the tallest, growing nearly 1.80 meters (5.9 feet) tall. The New Zealand giant penguin (Pachydyptes ponderosus) was probably the heaviest, weighing 80 kg or more. Both were found on New Zealand, the former also in the Antarctic farther eastwards." (Wikipedia, s.v. Pinguin)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@JBH I'm not sure, would it fit? The other entries of the anatomically correct series are 'real' creatures, whereas this is entire 'fictional' and 'unique'. If you deem it acceptable I will add it.
$endgroup$
– A Lambent Eye
yesterday