Inexact numbers as keys in Association?Dr. StrangeNumbers or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Floating Point ArithmeticFractional Keys in AssociationsReplace and AssociationWrong Limit[…] for inexact expressionsPicking out multiple keys from an arrayUsing Case to pull Keys and Values out of a nested AssociationPattern matching Association in rulesCreating dataset from list of ragged associations with defaults for missing keyshow to count or extract Cases out of list of association that matches patternRename Keys in Nested AssociationExtracting the graph of Keys in nested Associations
Knowledge-based authentication using Domain-driven Design in C#
Why was the shrink from 8″ made only to 5.25″ and not smaller (4″ or less)
What's the meaning of "Sollensaussagen"?
Sums of two squares in arithmetic progressions
Why do I get negative height?
What reasons are there for a Capitalist to oppose a 100% inheritance tax?
How to remove border from elements in the last row?
Venezuelan girlfriend wants to travel the USA to be with me. What is the process?
Blending or harmonizing
Ambiguity in the definition of entropy
Notepad++ delete until colon for every line with replace all
Are British MPs missing the point, with these 'Indicative Votes'?
What are the G forces leaving Earth orbit?
One verb to replace 'be a member of' a club
How exploitable/balanced is this homebrew spell: Spell Permanency?
Can someone clarify Hamming's notion of important problems in relation to modern academia?
files created then deleted at every second in tmp directory
How to compactly explain secondary and tertiary characters without resorting to stereotypes?
Avoiding the "not like other girls" trope?
In Bayesian inference, why are some terms dropped from the posterior predictive?
How seriously should I take size and weight limits of hand luggage?
My ex-girlfriend uses my Apple ID to log in to her iPad. Do I have to give her my Apple ID password to reset it?
What do you call someone who asks many questions?
Does Dispel Magic work on Tiny Hut?
Inexact numbers as keys in Association?
Dr. StrangeNumbers or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Floating Point ArithmeticFractional Keys in AssociationsReplace and AssociationWrong Limit[…] for inexact expressionsPicking out multiple keys from an arrayUsing Case to pull Keys and Values out of a nested AssociationPattern matching Association in rulesCreating dataset from list of ragged associations with defaults for missing keyshow to count or extract Cases out of list of association that matches patternRename Keys in Nested AssociationExtracting the graph of Keys in nested Associations
$begingroup$
Can someone explain me how Mathematica's Associations behave with inexact numbers as keys:
<| 0.22499999999999964` -> a |> [0.22499999999999965`]
and
<| 0.22499999999999964` -> a |> [0.22499999999999961`]
both give the value a, whereas
<| 0.22499999999999964` -> a |> [0.22499999999999966`] gives Missing as an answer.
associations machine-precision
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can someone explain me how Mathematica's Associations behave with inexact numbers as keys:
<| 0.22499999999999964` -> a |> [0.22499999999999965`]
and
<| 0.22499999999999964` -> a |> [0.22499999999999961`]
both give the value a, whereas
<| 0.22499999999999964` -> a |> [0.22499999999999966`] gives Missing as an answer.
associations machine-precision
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Looks like this thing, but with associations. Why do you need to use inexact numbers as keys?
$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive♦
2 days ago
4
$begingroup$
"Can someone explain me how Mathematica's Associations behave [...]?" They behave badly. Don't do that.
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Association
is the name of the function in Mathematica, so I am not sure what was productive about the edit I just rolled back.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive♦
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can someone explain me how Mathematica's Associations behave with inexact numbers as keys:
<| 0.22499999999999964` -> a |> [0.22499999999999965`]
and
<| 0.22499999999999964` -> a |> [0.22499999999999961`]
both give the value a, whereas
<| 0.22499999999999964` -> a |> [0.22499999999999966`] gives Missing as an answer.
associations machine-precision
$endgroup$
Can someone explain me how Mathematica's Associations behave with inexact numbers as keys:
<| 0.22499999999999964` -> a |> [0.22499999999999965`]
and
<| 0.22499999999999964` -> a |> [0.22499999999999961`]
both give the value a, whereas
<| 0.22499999999999964` -> a |> [0.22499999999999966`] gives Missing as an answer.
associations machine-precision
associations machine-precision
edited yesterday
J. M. is slightly pensive♦
98.9k10311467
98.9k10311467
asked 2 days ago
Ali HashmiAli Hashmi
5,71931432
5,71931432
2
$begingroup$
Looks like this thing, but with associations. Why do you need to use inexact numbers as keys?
$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive♦
2 days ago
4
$begingroup$
"Can someone explain me how Mathematica's Associations behave [...]?" They behave badly. Don't do that.
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Association
is the name of the function in Mathematica, so I am not sure what was productive about the edit I just rolled back.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive♦
yesterday
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Looks like this thing, but with associations. Why do you need to use inexact numbers as keys?
$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive♦
2 days ago
4
$begingroup$
"Can someone explain me how Mathematica's Associations behave [...]?" They behave badly. Don't do that.
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Association
is the name of the function in Mathematica, so I am not sure what was productive about the edit I just rolled back.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive♦
yesterday
2
2
$begingroup$
Looks like this thing, but with associations. Why do you need to use inexact numbers as keys?
$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive♦
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Looks like this thing, but with associations. Why do you need to use inexact numbers as keys?
$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive♦
2 days ago
4
4
$begingroup$
"Can someone explain me how Mathematica's Associations behave [...]?" They behave badly. Don't do that.
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
2 days ago
$begingroup$
"Can someone explain me how Mathematica's Associations behave [...]?" They behave badly. Don't do that.
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Association
is the name of the function in Mathematica, so I am not sure what was productive about the edit I just rolled back.$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive♦
yesterday
$begingroup$
Association
is the name of the function in Mathematica, so I am not sure what was productive about the edit I just rolled back.$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive♦
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Lookups with inexact numbers behave like other lookups: they use hashing. We can check that the results are consistent with what Hash
does.
vals = 0.22499999999999961`, 0.22499999999999964`,
0.22499999999999965`, 0.22499999999999966`;
Hash /@ vals
(* Out[11]= 1879126079618645156, 1879126079618645156,
1879126079618645156, 5861724109654749116 *)
When hashing approximate values, there are going to be sharp boundaries (discontinuities, in effect). This is a tradeoff between having "very" close neighbors hash to the same value, and maintaining transitivity.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194309%2finexact-numbers-as-keys-in-association%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Lookups with inexact numbers behave like other lookups: they use hashing. We can check that the results are consistent with what Hash
does.
vals = 0.22499999999999961`, 0.22499999999999964`,
0.22499999999999965`, 0.22499999999999966`;
Hash /@ vals
(* Out[11]= 1879126079618645156, 1879126079618645156,
1879126079618645156, 5861724109654749116 *)
When hashing approximate values, there are going to be sharp boundaries (discontinuities, in effect). This is a tradeoff between having "very" close neighbors hash to the same value, and maintaining transitivity.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Lookups with inexact numbers behave like other lookups: they use hashing. We can check that the results are consistent with what Hash
does.
vals = 0.22499999999999961`, 0.22499999999999964`,
0.22499999999999965`, 0.22499999999999966`;
Hash /@ vals
(* Out[11]= 1879126079618645156, 1879126079618645156,
1879126079618645156, 5861724109654749116 *)
When hashing approximate values, there are going to be sharp boundaries (discontinuities, in effect). This is a tradeoff between having "very" close neighbors hash to the same value, and maintaining transitivity.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Lookups with inexact numbers behave like other lookups: they use hashing. We can check that the results are consistent with what Hash
does.
vals = 0.22499999999999961`, 0.22499999999999964`,
0.22499999999999965`, 0.22499999999999966`;
Hash /@ vals
(* Out[11]= 1879126079618645156, 1879126079618645156,
1879126079618645156, 5861724109654749116 *)
When hashing approximate values, there are going to be sharp boundaries (discontinuities, in effect). This is a tradeoff between having "very" close neighbors hash to the same value, and maintaining transitivity.
$endgroup$
Lookups with inexact numbers behave like other lookups: they use hashing. We can check that the results are consistent with what Hash
does.
vals = 0.22499999999999961`, 0.22499999999999964`,
0.22499999999999965`, 0.22499999999999966`;
Hash /@ vals
(* Out[11]= 1879126079618645156, 1879126079618645156,
1879126079618645156, 5861724109654749116 *)
When hashing approximate values, there are going to be sharp boundaries (discontinuities, in effect). This is a tradeoff between having "very" close neighbors hash to the same value, and maintaining transitivity.
answered 2 days ago
Daniel LichtblauDaniel Lichtblau
47.5k277165
47.5k277165
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194309%2finexact-numbers-as-keys-in-association%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Looks like this thing, but with associations. Why do you need to use inexact numbers as keys?
$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive♦
2 days ago
4
$begingroup$
"Can someone explain me how Mathematica's Associations behave [...]?" They behave badly. Don't do that.
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Association
is the name of the function in Mathematica, so I am not sure what was productive about the edit I just rolled back.$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive♦
yesterday