How do Java 8 default methods hеlp with lambdas?Is Java “pass-by-reference” or “pass-by-value”?How do I efficiently iterate over each entry in a Java Map?How do I read / convert an InputStream into a String in Java?When to use LinkedList over ArrayList in Java?How do I generate random integers within a specific range in Java?Does Java support default parameter values?How do I convert a String to an int in Java?Creating a memory leak with JavaHow should I have explained the difference between an Interface and an Abstract class?Why is “final” not allowed in Java 8 interface methods?

What does "function" actually mean in music?

Why do games have consumables?

How can I wire a 9-position switch so that each position turns on one more LED than the one before?

My bank got bought out, am I now going to have to start filing tax returns in a different state?

Will I lose my paid in full property

How do I deal with a coworker that keeps asking to make small superficial changes to a report, and it is seriously triggering my anxiety?

Why didn't the Space Shuttle bounce back into space as many times as possible so as to lose a lot of kinetic energy up there?

What is this word supposed to be?

"My boss was furious with me and I have been fired" vs. "My boss was furious with me and I was fired"

What makes accurate emulation of old systems a difficult task?

Crossed out red box fitting tightly around image

A strange hotel

Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?

Contradiction proof for inequality of P and NP?

I preordered a game on my Xbox while on the home screen of my friend's account. Which of us owns the game?

Is there a word for the censored part of a video?

How bug prioritization works in agile projects vs non agile

Creating a chemical industry from a medieval tech level without petroleum

Are there moral objections to a life motivated purely by money? How to sway a person from this lifestyle?

Why do real positive eigenvalues result in an unstable system? What about eigenvalues between 0 and 1? or 1?

As an international instructor, should I openly talk about my accent?

Why is the underscore command _ useful?

Where was the County of Thurn und Taxis located?

"Whatever a Russian does, they end up making the Kalashnikov gun"? Are there any similar proverbs in English?



How do Java 8 default methods hеlp with lambdas?


Is Java “pass-by-reference” or “pass-by-value”?How do I efficiently iterate over each entry in a Java Map?How do I read / convert an InputStream into a String in Java?When to use LinkedList over ArrayList in Java?How do I generate random integers within a specific range in Java?Does Java support default parameter values?How do I convert a String to an int in Java?Creating a memory leak with JavaHow should I have explained the difference between an Interface and an Abstract class?Why is “final” not allowed in Java 8 interface methods?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








18















It is claimed in this article that:




one of the major reasons for introducing default methods in
interfaces is to enhance the Collections API in Java 8 to support
lambda expressions.




I could understand that the @FunctionalInterface helped by saying that there is ONLY one abstract method and the lambda should represent this particular method.



But how is it that the default methods helped to support lambdas?










share|improve this question






























    18















    It is claimed in this article that:




    one of the major reasons for introducing default methods in
    interfaces is to enhance the Collections API in Java 8 to support
    lambda expressions.




    I could understand that the @FunctionalInterface helped by saying that there is ONLY one abstract method and the lambda should represent this particular method.



    But how is it that the default methods helped to support lambdas?










    share|improve this question


























      18












      18








      18


      2






      It is claimed in this article that:




      one of the major reasons for introducing default methods in
      interfaces is to enhance the Collections API in Java 8 to support
      lambda expressions.




      I could understand that the @FunctionalInterface helped by saying that there is ONLY one abstract method and the lambda should represent this particular method.



      But how is it that the default methods helped to support lambdas?










      share|improve this question
















      It is claimed in this article that:




      one of the major reasons for introducing default methods in
      interfaces is to enhance the Collections API in Java 8 to support
      lambda expressions.




      I could understand that the @FunctionalInterface helped by saying that there is ONLY one abstract method and the lambda should represent this particular method.



      But how is it that the default methods helped to support lambdas?







      java






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Apr 21 at 12:24









      Boann

      37.6k1291123




      37.6k1291123










      asked Apr 21 at 7:39









      mCsmCs

      6361832




      6361832






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          30














          To give you an example take the case of the Collection.forEach method, which is designed to take an instance of the Consumer functional interface and has a default implementation in the Collection interface:



          default void forEach(Consumer<? super T> action) 
          Objects.requireNonNull(action);
          for (T t : this)
          action.accept(t);




          If the JDK designers didn't introduce the concept of default methods then all the implementing classes of the Collection interface would have to implement the forEach method so it would be problematic to switch to Java - 8 without breaking your code.



          So to facilitate the adoption of lambdas and the use of the new functional interfaces like Consumer, Supplier, Predicate, etc. the JDK designers introduced the concept of default methods to provide backward compatibility and it is now easier to switch to Java - 8 without making any changes.



          If you don't like the default implementation in the interface you can override it and supply your own.






          share|improve this answer
































            13














            They helped indirectly: you can use lambdas on collections thanks to additional methods like removeIf(), stream(), etc.



            Those methods couldn't have been added to collections without completely breaking existing collection implementations if they had not been added as default methods.






            share|improve this answer






























              4














              Another situation where default methods help a ton is in the functional interfaces themself. Take the Function<T,R> interface for example, the only method you really care about is R apply(T t), so when you need a Functionsomewhere, you can pass a lambda and it will create a Function instance where that lambda method is the apply method.



              However once you have a Function instance, you can call other useful methods like <V> Function<T,V> andThen(Function<? super R,? extends V> after) that combine functions on them. The default implementation is simply chaining the functions, but you can override it if you create your own class implementing the Function interface.



              In short, default methods give you an easy way to create lambdas from functional interfaces that have additinal methods, while giving you the option to override those additinal methods in with a full class if you need to.






              share|improve this answer























              • In that case an abstract class would've achieved the same thing (though removing the opportunity to extend another class).

                – OrangeDog
                Apr 22 at 9:04











              • I consider this as the most crucial point (At least referring to the quoted statement and question title on a language level - not so much on the (collections) API level) : Namely, that you can have an interface with multiple methods, but still "implement" it via a lambda expression if and only if it has a single abstract method (in fact, in the beginning, these types had been referred to as "SAM Types" or "Single Abstract Method Types").

                – Marco13
                Apr 22 at 18:07












              Your Answer






              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
              StackExchange.snippets.init();
              );
              );
              , "code-snippets");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "1"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55780860%2fhow-do-java-8-default-methods-h%25d0%25b5lp-with-lambdas%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              30














              To give you an example take the case of the Collection.forEach method, which is designed to take an instance of the Consumer functional interface and has a default implementation in the Collection interface:



              default void forEach(Consumer<? super T> action) 
              Objects.requireNonNull(action);
              for (T t : this)
              action.accept(t);




              If the JDK designers didn't introduce the concept of default methods then all the implementing classes of the Collection interface would have to implement the forEach method so it would be problematic to switch to Java - 8 without breaking your code.



              So to facilitate the adoption of lambdas and the use of the new functional interfaces like Consumer, Supplier, Predicate, etc. the JDK designers introduced the concept of default methods to provide backward compatibility and it is now easier to switch to Java - 8 without making any changes.



              If you don't like the default implementation in the interface you can override it and supply your own.






              share|improve this answer





























                30














                To give you an example take the case of the Collection.forEach method, which is designed to take an instance of the Consumer functional interface and has a default implementation in the Collection interface:



                default void forEach(Consumer<? super T> action) 
                Objects.requireNonNull(action);
                for (T t : this)
                action.accept(t);




                If the JDK designers didn't introduce the concept of default methods then all the implementing classes of the Collection interface would have to implement the forEach method so it would be problematic to switch to Java - 8 without breaking your code.



                So to facilitate the adoption of lambdas and the use of the new functional interfaces like Consumer, Supplier, Predicate, etc. the JDK designers introduced the concept of default methods to provide backward compatibility and it is now easier to switch to Java - 8 without making any changes.



                If you don't like the default implementation in the interface you can override it and supply your own.






                share|improve this answer



























                  30












                  30








                  30







                  To give you an example take the case of the Collection.forEach method, which is designed to take an instance of the Consumer functional interface and has a default implementation in the Collection interface:



                  default void forEach(Consumer<? super T> action) 
                  Objects.requireNonNull(action);
                  for (T t : this)
                  action.accept(t);




                  If the JDK designers didn't introduce the concept of default methods then all the implementing classes of the Collection interface would have to implement the forEach method so it would be problematic to switch to Java - 8 without breaking your code.



                  So to facilitate the adoption of lambdas and the use of the new functional interfaces like Consumer, Supplier, Predicate, etc. the JDK designers introduced the concept of default methods to provide backward compatibility and it is now easier to switch to Java - 8 without making any changes.



                  If you don't like the default implementation in the interface you can override it and supply your own.






                  share|improve this answer















                  To give you an example take the case of the Collection.forEach method, which is designed to take an instance of the Consumer functional interface and has a default implementation in the Collection interface:



                  default void forEach(Consumer<? super T> action) 
                  Objects.requireNonNull(action);
                  for (T t : this)
                  action.accept(t);




                  If the JDK designers didn't introduce the concept of default methods then all the implementing classes of the Collection interface would have to implement the forEach method so it would be problematic to switch to Java - 8 without breaking your code.



                  So to facilitate the adoption of lambdas and the use of the new functional interfaces like Consumer, Supplier, Predicate, etc. the JDK designers introduced the concept of default methods to provide backward compatibility and it is now easier to switch to Java - 8 without making any changes.



                  If you don't like the default implementation in the interface you can override it and supply your own.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Apr 21 at 19:13









                  Oleksandr

                  9,64044372




                  9,64044372










                  answered Apr 21 at 7:52









                  Amardeep BhowmickAmardeep Bhowmick

                  6,45121231




                  6,45121231























                      13














                      They helped indirectly: you can use lambdas on collections thanks to additional methods like removeIf(), stream(), etc.



                      Those methods couldn't have been added to collections without completely breaking existing collection implementations if they had not been added as default methods.






                      share|improve this answer



























                        13














                        They helped indirectly: you can use lambdas on collections thanks to additional methods like removeIf(), stream(), etc.



                        Those methods couldn't have been added to collections without completely breaking existing collection implementations if they had not been added as default methods.






                        share|improve this answer

























                          13












                          13








                          13







                          They helped indirectly: you can use lambdas on collections thanks to additional methods like removeIf(), stream(), etc.



                          Those methods couldn't have been added to collections without completely breaking existing collection implementations if they had not been added as default methods.






                          share|improve this answer













                          They helped indirectly: you can use lambdas on collections thanks to additional methods like removeIf(), stream(), etc.



                          Those methods couldn't have been added to collections without completely breaking existing collection implementations if they had not been added as default methods.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered Apr 21 at 7:49









                          JB NizetJB Nizet

                          551k618991026




                          551k618991026





















                              4














                              Another situation where default methods help a ton is in the functional interfaces themself. Take the Function<T,R> interface for example, the only method you really care about is R apply(T t), so when you need a Functionsomewhere, you can pass a lambda and it will create a Function instance where that lambda method is the apply method.



                              However once you have a Function instance, you can call other useful methods like <V> Function<T,V> andThen(Function<? super R,? extends V> after) that combine functions on them. The default implementation is simply chaining the functions, but you can override it if you create your own class implementing the Function interface.



                              In short, default methods give you an easy way to create lambdas from functional interfaces that have additinal methods, while giving you the option to override those additinal methods in with a full class if you need to.






                              share|improve this answer























                              • In that case an abstract class would've achieved the same thing (though removing the opportunity to extend another class).

                                – OrangeDog
                                Apr 22 at 9:04











                              • I consider this as the most crucial point (At least referring to the quoted statement and question title on a language level - not so much on the (collections) API level) : Namely, that you can have an interface with multiple methods, but still "implement" it via a lambda expression if and only if it has a single abstract method (in fact, in the beginning, these types had been referred to as "SAM Types" or "Single Abstract Method Types").

                                – Marco13
                                Apr 22 at 18:07
















                              4














                              Another situation where default methods help a ton is in the functional interfaces themself. Take the Function<T,R> interface for example, the only method you really care about is R apply(T t), so when you need a Functionsomewhere, you can pass a lambda and it will create a Function instance where that lambda method is the apply method.



                              However once you have a Function instance, you can call other useful methods like <V> Function<T,V> andThen(Function<? super R,? extends V> after) that combine functions on them. The default implementation is simply chaining the functions, but you can override it if you create your own class implementing the Function interface.



                              In short, default methods give you an easy way to create lambdas from functional interfaces that have additinal methods, while giving you the option to override those additinal methods in with a full class if you need to.






                              share|improve this answer























                              • In that case an abstract class would've achieved the same thing (though removing the opportunity to extend another class).

                                – OrangeDog
                                Apr 22 at 9:04











                              • I consider this as the most crucial point (At least referring to the quoted statement and question title on a language level - not so much on the (collections) API level) : Namely, that you can have an interface with multiple methods, but still "implement" it via a lambda expression if and only if it has a single abstract method (in fact, in the beginning, these types had been referred to as "SAM Types" or "Single Abstract Method Types").

                                – Marco13
                                Apr 22 at 18:07














                              4












                              4








                              4







                              Another situation where default methods help a ton is in the functional interfaces themself. Take the Function<T,R> interface for example, the only method you really care about is R apply(T t), so when you need a Functionsomewhere, you can pass a lambda and it will create a Function instance where that lambda method is the apply method.



                              However once you have a Function instance, you can call other useful methods like <V> Function<T,V> andThen(Function<? super R,? extends V> after) that combine functions on them. The default implementation is simply chaining the functions, but you can override it if you create your own class implementing the Function interface.



                              In short, default methods give you an easy way to create lambdas from functional interfaces that have additinal methods, while giving you the option to override those additinal methods in with a full class if you need to.






                              share|improve this answer













                              Another situation where default methods help a ton is in the functional interfaces themself. Take the Function<T,R> interface for example, the only method you really care about is R apply(T t), so when you need a Functionsomewhere, you can pass a lambda and it will create a Function instance where that lambda method is the apply method.



                              However once you have a Function instance, you can call other useful methods like <V> Function<T,V> andThen(Function<? super R,? extends V> after) that combine functions on them. The default implementation is simply chaining the functions, but you can override it if you create your own class implementing the Function interface.



                              In short, default methods give you an easy way to create lambdas from functional interfaces that have additinal methods, while giving you the option to override those additinal methods in with a full class if you need to.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered Apr 21 at 14:46









                              kajacxkajacx

                              7,61142754




                              7,61142754












                              • In that case an abstract class would've achieved the same thing (though removing the opportunity to extend another class).

                                – OrangeDog
                                Apr 22 at 9:04











                              • I consider this as the most crucial point (At least referring to the quoted statement and question title on a language level - not so much on the (collections) API level) : Namely, that you can have an interface with multiple methods, but still "implement" it via a lambda expression if and only if it has a single abstract method (in fact, in the beginning, these types had been referred to as "SAM Types" or "Single Abstract Method Types").

                                – Marco13
                                Apr 22 at 18:07


















                              • In that case an abstract class would've achieved the same thing (though removing the opportunity to extend another class).

                                – OrangeDog
                                Apr 22 at 9:04











                              • I consider this as the most crucial point (At least referring to the quoted statement and question title on a language level - not so much on the (collections) API level) : Namely, that you can have an interface with multiple methods, but still "implement" it via a lambda expression if and only if it has a single abstract method (in fact, in the beginning, these types had been referred to as "SAM Types" or "Single Abstract Method Types").

                                – Marco13
                                Apr 22 at 18:07

















                              In that case an abstract class would've achieved the same thing (though removing the opportunity to extend another class).

                              – OrangeDog
                              Apr 22 at 9:04





                              In that case an abstract class would've achieved the same thing (though removing the opportunity to extend another class).

                              – OrangeDog
                              Apr 22 at 9:04













                              I consider this as the most crucial point (At least referring to the quoted statement and question title on a language level - not so much on the (collections) API level) : Namely, that you can have an interface with multiple methods, but still "implement" it via a lambda expression if and only if it has a single abstract method (in fact, in the beginning, these types had been referred to as "SAM Types" or "Single Abstract Method Types").

                              – Marco13
                              Apr 22 at 18:07






                              I consider this as the most crucial point (At least referring to the quoted statement and question title on a language level - not so much on the (collections) API level) : Namely, that you can have an interface with multiple methods, but still "implement" it via a lambda expression if and only if it has a single abstract method (in fact, in the beginning, these types had been referred to as "SAM Types" or "Single Abstract Method Types").

                              – Marco13
                              Apr 22 at 18:07


















                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55780860%2fhow-do-java-8-default-methods-h%25d0%25b5lp-with-lambdas%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Bulk add to cart function issuecart vs. mini cart issue … rwd themeRedirect Add to cart button to cart pageAdd to cart issue - Magento 2.1The requested Payment Method is not available When creating an orderM2: reason add-to-cart might not function in production modeAdd to cart issue in some android devicesMagento 2 - custom price can not add to subtotal and grand total after add to cartAdd to cart codeIssue with my cart module on pdp and cart pages, just keeps spinningBulk price and quantity update using rest api

                              Magento2 - How to hide price filter only in specific categories?Multiselect price filter attribute in layered navigationhide only some categories from layered navigation in magentoRemove Price Filter on certain categoriescustomize layered price filter?Hide Price for a particular customer groupPrice filter in layered navigation not working correctly with price including tax in magento 2.2.3Magento 2 how to hide attribute at Layered navigation?Magento 2. how to hide price only for specific categoriesMagento 2 How can I hide the price and total from cart and checkout summary?Magento2: Can we add navigation layered filter like price filter for other attribute?