How do Java 8 default methods hеlp with lambdas?Is Java “pass-by-reference” or “pass-by-value”?How do I efficiently iterate over each entry in a Java Map?How do I read / convert an InputStream into a String in Java?When to use LinkedList over ArrayList in Java?How do I generate random integers within a specific range in Java?Does Java support default parameter values?How do I convert a String to an int in Java?Creating a memory leak with JavaHow should I have explained the difference between an Interface and an Abstract class?Why is “final” not allowed in Java 8 interface methods?
What does "function" actually mean in music?
Why do games have consumables?
How can I wire a 9-position switch so that each position turns on one more LED than the one before?
My bank got bought out, am I now going to have to start filing tax returns in a different state?
Will I lose my paid in full property
How do I deal with a coworker that keeps asking to make small superficial changes to a report, and it is seriously triggering my anxiety?
Why didn't the Space Shuttle bounce back into space as many times as possible so as to lose a lot of kinetic energy up there?
What is this word supposed to be?
"My boss was furious with me and I have been fired" vs. "My boss was furious with me and I was fired"
What makes accurate emulation of old systems a difficult task?
Crossed out red box fitting tightly around image
A strange hotel
Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?
Contradiction proof for inequality of P and NP?
I preordered a game on my Xbox while on the home screen of my friend's account. Which of us owns the game?
Is there a word for the censored part of a video?
How bug prioritization works in agile projects vs non agile
Creating a chemical industry from a medieval tech level without petroleum
Are there moral objections to a life motivated purely by money? How to sway a person from this lifestyle?
Why do real positive eigenvalues result in an unstable system? What about eigenvalues between 0 and 1? or 1?
As an international instructor, should I openly talk about my accent?
Why is the underscore command _ useful?
Where was the County of Thurn und Taxis located?
"Whatever a Russian does, they end up making the Kalashnikov gun"? Are there any similar proverbs in English?
How do Java 8 default methods hеlp with lambdas?
Is Java “pass-by-reference” or “pass-by-value”?How do I efficiently iterate over each entry in a Java Map?How do I read / convert an InputStream into a String in Java?When to use LinkedList over ArrayList in Java?How do I generate random integers within a specific range in Java?Does Java support default parameter values?How do I convert a String to an int in Java?Creating a memory leak with JavaHow should I have explained the difference between an Interface and an Abstract class?Why is “final” not allowed in Java 8 interface methods?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
It is claimed in this article that:
one of the major reasons for introducing
defaultmethods in
interfaces is to enhance the Collections API in Java 8 to support
lambda expressions.
I could understand that the @FunctionalInterface helped by saying that there is ONLY one abstract method and the lambda should represent this particular method.
But how is it that the default methods helped to support lambdas?
java
add a comment |
It is claimed in this article that:
one of the major reasons for introducing
defaultmethods in
interfaces is to enhance the Collections API in Java 8 to support
lambda expressions.
I could understand that the @FunctionalInterface helped by saying that there is ONLY one abstract method and the lambda should represent this particular method.
But how is it that the default methods helped to support lambdas?
java
add a comment |
It is claimed in this article that:
one of the major reasons for introducing
defaultmethods in
interfaces is to enhance the Collections API in Java 8 to support
lambda expressions.
I could understand that the @FunctionalInterface helped by saying that there is ONLY one abstract method and the lambda should represent this particular method.
But how is it that the default methods helped to support lambdas?
java
It is claimed in this article that:
one of the major reasons for introducing
defaultmethods in
interfaces is to enhance the Collections API in Java 8 to support
lambda expressions.
I could understand that the @FunctionalInterface helped by saying that there is ONLY one abstract method and the lambda should represent this particular method.
But how is it that the default methods helped to support lambdas?
java
java
edited Apr 21 at 12:24
Boann
37.6k1291123
37.6k1291123
asked Apr 21 at 7:39
mCsmCs
6361832
6361832
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
To give you an example take the case of the Collection.forEach method, which is designed to take an instance of the Consumer functional interface and has a default implementation in the Collection interface:
default void forEach(Consumer<? super T> action)
Objects.requireNonNull(action);
for (T t : this)
action.accept(t);
If the JDK designers didn't introduce the concept of default methods then all the implementing classes of the Collection interface would have to implement the forEach method so it would be problematic to switch to Java - 8 without breaking your code.
So to facilitate the adoption of lambdas and the use of the new functional interfaces like Consumer, Supplier, Predicate, etc. the JDK designers introduced the concept of default methods to provide backward compatibility and it is now easier to switch to Java - 8 without making any changes.
If you don't like the default implementation in the interface you can override it and supply your own.
add a comment |
They helped indirectly: you can use lambdas on collections thanks to additional methods like removeIf(), stream(), etc.
Those methods couldn't have been added to collections without completely breaking existing collection implementations if they had not been added as default methods.
add a comment |
Another situation where default methods help a ton is in the functional interfaces themself. Take the Function<T,R> interface for example, the only method you really care about is R apply(T t), so when you need a Functionsomewhere, you can pass a lambda and it will create a Function instance where that lambda method is the apply method.
However once you have a Function instance, you can call other useful methods like <V> Function<T,V> andThen(Function<? super R,? extends V> after) that combine functions on them. The default implementation is simply chaining the functions, but you can override it if you create your own class implementing the Function interface.
In short, default methods give you an easy way to create lambdas from functional interfaces that have additinal methods, while giving you the option to override those additinal methods in with a full class if you need to.
In that case an abstract class would've achieved the same thing (though removing the opportunity to extend another class).
– OrangeDog
Apr 22 at 9:04
I consider this as the most crucial point (At least referring to the quoted statement and question title on a language level - not so much on the (collections) API level) : Namely, that you can have an interface with multiple methods, but still "implement" it via a lambda expression if and only if it has a single abstract method (in fact, in the beginning, these types had been referred to as "SAM Types" or "Single Abstract Method Types").
– Marco13
Apr 22 at 18:07
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55780860%2fhow-do-java-8-default-methods-h%25d0%25b5lp-with-lambdas%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
To give you an example take the case of the Collection.forEach method, which is designed to take an instance of the Consumer functional interface and has a default implementation in the Collection interface:
default void forEach(Consumer<? super T> action)
Objects.requireNonNull(action);
for (T t : this)
action.accept(t);
If the JDK designers didn't introduce the concept of default methods then all the implementing classes of the Collection interface would have to implement the forEach method so it would be problematic to switch to Java - 8 without breaking your code.
So to facilitate the adoption of lambdas and the use of the new functional interfaces like Consumer, Supplier, Predicate, etc. the JDK designers introduced the concept of default methods to provide backward compatibility and it is now easier to switch to Java - 8 without making any changes.
If you don't like the default implementation in the interface you can override it and supply your own.
add a comment |
To give you an example take the case of the Collection.forEach method, which is designed to take an instance of the Consumer functional interface and has a default implementation in the Collection interface:
default void forEach(Consumer<? super T> action)
Objects.requireNonNull(action);
for (T t : this)
action.accept(t);
If the JDK designers didn't introduce the concept of default methods then all the implementing classes of the Collection interface would have to implement the forEach method so it would be problematic to switch to Java - 8 without breaking your code.
So to facilitate the adoption of lambdas and the use of the new functional interfaces like Consumer, Supplier, Predicate, etc. the JDK designers introduced the concept of default methods to provide backward compatibility and it is now easier to switch to Java - 8 without making any changes.
If you don't like the default implementation in the interface you can override it and supply your own.
add a comment |
To give you an example take the case of the Collection.forEach method, which is designed to take an instance of the Consumer functional interface and has a default implementation in the Collection interface:
default void forEach(Consumer<? super T> action)
Objects.requireNonNull(action);
for (T t : this)
action.accept(t);
If the JDK designers didn't introduce the concept of default methods then all the implementing classes of the Collection interface would have to implement the forEach method so it would be problematic to switch to Java - 8 without breaking your code.
So to facilitate the adoption of lambdas and the use of the new functional interfaces like Consumer, Supplier, Predicate, etc. the JDK designers introduced the concept of default methods to provide backward compatibility and it is now easier to switch to Java - 8 without making any changes.
If you don't like the default implementation in the interface you can override it and supply your own.
To give you an example take the case of the Collection.forEach method, which is designed to take an instance of the Consumer functional interface and has a default implementation in the Collection interface:
default void forEach(Consumer<? super T> action)
Objects.requireNonNull(action);
for (T t : this)
action.accept(t);
If the JDK designers didn't introduce the concept of default methods then all the implementing classes of the Collection interface would have to implement the forEach method so it would be problematic to switch to Java - 8 without breaking your code.
So to facilitate the adoption of lambdas and the use of the new functional interfaces like Consumer, Supplier, Predicate, etc. the JDK designers introduced the concept of default methods to provide backward compatibility and it is now easier to switch to Java - 8 without making any changes.
If you don't like the default implementation in the interface you can override it and supply your own.
edited Apr 21 at 19:13
Oleksandr
9,64044372
9,64044372
answered Apr 21 at 7:52
Amardeep BhowmickAmardeep Bhowmick
6,45121231
6,45121231
add a comment |
add a comment |
They helped indirectly: you can use lambdas on collections thanks to additional methods like removeIf(), stream(), etc.
Those methods couldn't have been added to collections without completely breaking existing collection implementations if they had not been added as default methods.
add a comment |
They helped indirectly: you can use lambdas on collections thanks to additional methods like removeIf(), stream(), etc.
Those methods couldn't have been added to collections without completely breaking existing collection implementations if they had not been added as default methods.
add a comment |
They helped indirectly: you can use lambdas on collections thanks to additional methods like removeIf(), stream(), etc.
Those methods couldn't have been added to collections without completely breaking existing collection implementations if they had not been added as default methods.
They helped indirectly: you can use lambdas on collections thanks to additional methods like removeIf(), stream(), etc.
Those methods couldn't have been added to collections without completely breaking existing collection implementations if they had not been added as default methods.
answered Apr 21 at 7:49
JB NizetJB Nizet
551k618991026
551k618991026
add a comment |
add a comment |
Another situation where default methods help a ton is in the functional interfaces themself. Take the Function<T,R> interface for example, the only method you really care about is R apply(T t), so when you need a Functionsomewhere, you can pass a lambda and it will create a Function instance where that lambda method is the apply method.
However once you have a Function instance, you can call other useful methods like <V> Function<T,V> andThen(Function<? super R,? extends V> after) that combine functions on them. The default implementation is simply chaining the functions, but you can override it if you create your own class implementing the Function interface.
In short, default methods give you an easy way to create lambdas from functional interfaces that have additinal methods, while giving you the option to override those additinal methods in with a full class if you need to.
In that case an abstract class would've achieved the same thing (though removing the opportunity to extend another class).
– OrangeDog
Apr 22 at 9:04
I consider this as the most crucial point (At least referring to the quoted statement and question title on a language level - not so much on the (collections) API level) : Namely, that you can have an interface with multiple methods, but still "implement" it via a lambda expression if and only if it has a single abstract method (in fact, in the beginning, these types had been referred to as "SAM Types" or "Single Abstract Method Types").
– Marco13
Apr 22 at 18:07
add a comment |
Another situation where default methods help a ton is in the functional interfaces themself. Take the Function<T,R> interface for example, the only method you really care about is R apply(T t), so when you need a Functionsomewhere, you can pass a lambda and it will create a Function instance where that lambda method is the apply method.
However once you have a Function instance, you can call other useful methods like <V> Function<T,V> andThen(Function<? super R,? extends V> after) that combine functions on them. The default implementation is simply chaining the functions, but you can override it if you create your own class implementing the Function interface.
In short, default methods give you an easy way to create lambdas from functional interfaces that have additinal methods, while giving you the option to override those additinal methods in with a full class if you need to.
In that case an abstract class would've achieved the same thing (though removing the opportunity to extend another class).
– OrangeDog
Apr 22 at 9:04
I consider this as the most crucial point (At least referring to the quoted statement and question title on a language level - not so much on the (collections) API level) : Namely, that you can have an interface with multiple methods, but still "implement" it via a lambda expression if and only if it has a single abstract method (in fact, in the beginning, these types had been referred to as "SAM Types" or "Single Abstract Method Types").
– Marco13
Apr 22 at 18:07
add a comment |
Another situation where default methods help a ton is in the functional interfaces themself. Take the Function<T,R> interface for example, the only method you really care about is R apply(T t), so when you need a Functionsomewhere, you can pass a lambda and it will create a Function instance where that lambda method is the apply method.
However once you have a Function instance, you can call other useful methods like <V> Function<T,V> andThen(Function<? super R,? extends V> after) that combine functions on them. The default implementation is simply chaining the functions, but you can override it if you create your own class implementing the Function interface.
In short, default methods give you an easy way to create lambdas from functional interfaces that have additinal methods, while giving you the option to override those additinal methods in with a full class if you need to.
Another situation where default methods help a ton is in the functional interfaces themself. Take the Function<T,R> interface for example, the only method you really care about is R apply(T t), so when you need a Functionsomewhere, you can pass a lambda and it will create a Function instance where that lambda method is the apply method.
However once you have a Function instance, you can call other useful methods like <V> Function<T,V> andThen(Function<? super R,? extends V> after) that combine functions on them. The default implementation is simply chaining the functions, but you can override it if you create your own class implementing the Function interface.
In short, default methods give you an easy way to create lambdas from functional interfaces that have additinal methods, while giving you the option to override those additinal methods in with a full class if you need to.
answered Apr 21 at 14:46
kajacxkajacx
7,61142754
7,61142754
In that case an abstract class would've achieved the same thing (though removing the opportunity to extend another class).
– OrangeDog
Apr 22 at 9:04
I consider this as the most crucial point (At least referring to the quoted statement and question title on a language level - not so much on the (collections) API level) : Namely, that you can have an interface with multiple methods, but still "implement" it via a lambda expression if and only if it has a single abstract method (in fact, in the beginning, these types had been referred to as "SAM Types" or "Single Abstract Method Types").
– Marco13
Apr 22 at 18:07
add a comment |
In that case an abstract class would've achieved the same thing (though removing the opportunity to extend another class).
– OrangeDog
Apr 22 at 9:04
I consider this as the most crucial point (At least referring to the quoted statement and question title on a language level - not so much on the (collections) API level) : Namely, that you can have an interface with multiple methods, but still "implement" it via a lambda expression if and only if it has a single abstract method (in fact, in the beginning, these types had been referred to as "SAM Types" or "Single Abstract Method Types").
– Marco13
Apr 22 at 18:07
In that case an abstract class would've achieved the same thing (though removing the opportunity to extend another class).
– OrangeDog
Apr 22 at 9:04
In that case an abstract class would've achieved the same thing (though removing the opportunity to extend another class).
– OrangeDog
Apr 22 at 9:04
I consider this as the most crucial point (At least referring to the quoted statement and question title on a language level - not so much on the (collections) API level) : Namely, that you can have an interface with multiple methods, but still "implement" it via a lambda expression if and only if it has a single abstract method (in fact, in the beginning, these types had been referred to as "SAM Types" or "Single Abstract Method Types").
– Marco13
Apr 22 at 18:07
I consider this as the most crucial point (At least referring to the quoted statement and question title on a language level - not so much on the (collections) API level) : Namely, that you can have an interface with multiple methods, but still "implement" it via a lambda expression if and only if it has a single abstract method (in fact, in the beginning, these types had been referred to as "SAM Types" or "Single Abstract Method Types").
– Marco13
Apr 22 at 18:07
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55780860%2fhow-do-java-8-default-methods-h%25d0%25b5lp-with-lambdas%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown