Log for database tempdb is not availabletempdb in sql serverThe log for database 'tempdb' is not availableBest practice for tempdb log fileTempDB Log Space and ACTIVE_TRANSACTIONMoving TempDB data and log filesVery high avg_write_stall_ms for tempdbThe transaction log for database 'database' is full due to 'LOG_BACKUP'. Nothing workstempdb growth and shrinking tempdbtempdb log file usage huge by sleeping status sessions but not relased the spaceSQL Server tempdb on RAM Disk?SQL Server TempDB transaction log IssueThe log for database 'tempdb' is not available
Why must Chinese maps be obfuscated?
Injection into a proper class and choice without regularity
Can a Bard use the Spell Glyph option of the Glyph of Warding spell and cast a known spell into the glyph?
How do I reattach a shelf to the wall when it ripped out of the wall?
Why didn't the Space Shuttle bounce back into space as many times as possible so as to lose a lot of kinetic energy up there?
Is there a better way to say "see someone's dreams"?
How to have a sharp product image?
"The cow" OR "a cow" OR "cows" in this context
How much of a wave function must reside inside event horizon for it to be consumed by the black hole?
Does a large simulator bay have standard public address announcements?
Nails holding drywall
Apply a different color ramp to subset of categorized symbols in QGIS?
Do I need to watch Ant-Man and the Wasp and Captain Marvel before watching Avengers: Endgame?
What is the best way to deal with NPC-NPC combat?
Can a stored procedure reference the database in which it is stored?
Are there moral objections to a life motivated purely by money? How to sway a person from this lifestyle?
"My boss was furious with me and I have been fired" vs. "My boss was furious with me and I was fired"
What is the unit of time_lock_delta in LND?
What is the term for a person whose job is to place products on shelves in stores?
Combinatorics problem, right solution?
I preordered a game on my Xbox while on the home screen of my friend's account. Which of us owns the game?
Contradiction proof for inequality of P and NP?
Why did Rep. Omar conclude her criticism of US troops with the phrase "NotTodaySatan"?
My admission is revoked after accepting the admission offer
Log for database tempdb is not available
tempdb in sql serverThe log for database 'tempdb' is not availableBest practice for tempdb log fileTempDB Log Space and ACTIVE_TRANSACTIONMoving TempDB data and log filesVery high avg_write_stall_ms for tempdbThe transaction log for database 'database' is full due to 'LOG_BACKUP'. Nothing workstempdb growth and shrinking tempdbtempdb log file usage huge by sleeping status sessions but not relased the spaceSQL Server tempdb on RAM Disk?SQL Server TempDB transaction log IssueThe log for database 'tempdb' is not available
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I have been struggling with this issue from so many months now, I am saying its not a database issue and assigning this case to Storage and Operating system team and they are assigning it to me afterwards. This issue is happening repeatedly and there is no any defined pattern of occurrence.
I checked the same question asked here and I can say this is not an issue with database corruption as I am using Ola Hallengren's script for maintenance job and database integrity check(checkdb) is done on weekly basis for User and system database and no issues reported in that.
Accessed second link also for the similar question and can confirm that tempdb is in simple recovery state.
I added one additional file for data and log both so that if one becomes unavailable, other one will still be accessible however later I came to know that the access of tempdb is sequential, so it will go to second file only when first gets full:
Every time this issue occurs, i could see that we have another error in the windows application log as below:
SQLServerLogMgr::LogWriter: Operating system error 170(The requested resource is in use.) encountered.
Storage team has excluded these files from anti-virus scanning.
One thing to note here - I checked other system databases and their file locations and could see that for master and model, data and log file is in the same drive(E drive) whereas for tempdb and msdb, data is in E drive and log file is in G drive, not sure if this is relevant.
Is there any sequence of checking system database when a job triggers or any event gets fired? If its an issue with that drive then, msdb is also on the same drive.
This is a clustered server with database drives shared in two servers and server is used for sharepoint application.
Server Version: Windows Server 2012 Standard
SQL Server: Microsoft SQL Server 2012 (SP4-GDR) (KB4057116) - 11.0.7462.6 (X64)
Jan 5 2018 22:11:56
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation
Standard Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.2 <X64> (Build 9200: ) (Hypervisor)
Only option that we are left with is to restart the service or fail-over - it just doesn't sound good to do so.
Any help in this regard is appreciated.
sql-server tempdb log
add a comment |
I have been struggling with this issue from so many months now, I am saying its not a database issue and assigning this case to Storage and Operating system team and they are assigning it to me afterwards. This issue is happening repeatedly and there is no any defined pattern of occurrence.
I checked the same question asked here and I can say this is not an issue with database corruption as I am using Ola Hallengren's script for maintenance job and database integrity check(checkdb) is done on weekly basis for User and system database and no issues reported in that.
Accessed second link also for the similar question and can confirm that tempdb is in simple recovery state.
I added one additional file for data and log both so that if one becomes unavailable, other one will still be accessible however later I came to know that the access of tempdb is sequential, so it will go to second file only when first gets full:
Every time this issue occurs, i could see that we have another error in the windows application log as below:
SQLServerLogMgr::LogWriter: Operating system error 170(The requested resource is in use.) encountered.
Storage team has excluded these files from anti-virus scanning.
One thing to note here - I checked other system databases and their file locations and could see that for master and model, data and log file is in the same drive(E drive) whereas for tempdb and msdb, data is in E drive and log file is in G drive, not sure if this is relevant.
Is there any sequence of checking system database when a job triggers or any event gets fired? If its an issue with that drive then, msdb is also on the same drive.
This is a clustered server with database drives shared in two servers and server is used for sharepoint application.
Server Version: Windows Server 2012 Standard
SQL Server: Microsoft SQL Server 2012 (SP4-GDR) (KB4057116) - 11.0.7462.6 (X64)
Jan 5 2018 22:11:56
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation
Standard Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.2 <X64> (Build 9200: ) (Hypervisor)
Only option that we are left with is to restart the service or fail-over - it just doesn't sound good to do so.
Any help in this regard is appreciated.
sql-server tempdb log
add a comment |
I have been struggling with this issue from so many months now, I am saying its not a database issue and assigning this case to Storage and Operating system team and they are assigning it to me afterwards. This issue is happening repeatedly and there is no any defined pattern of occurrence.
I checked the same question asked here and I can say this is not an issue with database corruption as I am using Ola Hallengren's script for maintenance job and database integrity check(checkdb) is done on weekly basis for User and system database and no issues reported in that.
Accessed second link also for the similar question and can confirm that tempdb is in simple recovery state.
I added one additional file for data and log both so that if one becomes unavailable, other one will still be accessible however later I came to know that the access of tempdb is sequential, so it will go to second file only when first gets full:
Every time this issue occurs, i could see that we have another error in the windows application log as below:
SQLServerLogMgr::LogWriter: Operating system error 170(The requested resource is in use.) encountered.
Storage team has excluded these files from anti-virus scanning.
One thing to note here - I checked other system databases and their file locations and could see that for master and model, data and log file is in the same drive(E drive) whereas for tempdb and msdb, data is in E drive and log file is in G drive, not sure if this is relevant.
Is there any sequence of checking system database when a job triggers or any event gets fired? If its an issue with that drive then, msdb is also on the same drive.
This is a clustered server with database drives shared in two servers and server is used for sharepoint application.
Server Version: Windows Server 2012 Standard
SQL Server: Microsoft SQL Server 2012 (SP4-GDR) (KB4057116) - 11.0.7462.6 (X64)
Jan 5 2018 22:11:56
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation
Standard Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.2 <X64> (Build 9200: ) (Hypervisor)
Only option that we are left with is to restart the service or fail-over - it just doesn't sound good to do so.
Any help in this regard is appreciated.
sql-server tempdb log
I have been struggling with this issue from so many months now, I am saying its not a database issue and assigning this case to Storage and Operating system team and they are assigning it to me afterwards. This issue is happening repeatedly and there is no any defined pattern of occurrence.
I checked the same question asked here and I can say this is not an issue with database corruption as I am using Ola Hallengren's script for maintenance job and database integrity check(checkdb) is done on weekly basis for User and system database and no issues reported in that.
Accessed second link also for the similar question and can confirm that tempdb is in simple recovery state.
I added one additional file for data and log both so that if one becomes unavailable, other one will still be accessible however later I came to know that the access of tempdb is sequential, so it will go to second file only when first gets full:
Every time this issue occurs, i could see that we have another error in the windows application log as below:
SQLServerLogMgr::LogWriter: Operating system error 170(The requested resource is in use.) encountered.
Storage team has excluded these files from anti-virus scanning.
One thing to note here - I checked other system databases and their file locations and could see that for master and model, data and log file is in the same drive(E drive) whereas for tempdb and msdb, data is in E drive and log file is in G drive, not sure if this is relevant.
Is there any sequence of checking system database when a job triggers or any event gets fired? If its an issue with that drive then, msdb is also on the same drive.
This is a clustered server with database drives shared in two servers and server is used for sharepoint application.
Server Version: Windows Server 2012 Standard
SQL Server: Microsoft SQL Server 2012 (SP4-GDR) (KB4057116) - 11.0.7462.6 (X64)
Jan 5 2018 22:11:56
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation
Standard Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.2 <X64> (Build 9200: ) (Hypervisor)
Only option that we are left with is to restart the service or fail-over - it just doesn't sound good to do so.
Any help in this regard is appreciated.
sql-server tempdb log
sql-server tempdb log
asked Apr 21 at 7:47
Learning_DBAdminLearning_DBAdmin
677215
677215
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
SQLServerLogMgr::LogWriter: Operating system error 170(The requested resource is in use.) encountered.
Yeah, this is bubbled up from the OS error the logwriter is running into. In this case it's OS error 170 which is the resource is in use. That's pretty damning that the issue is outside of SQL Server (barring any bad 3rd party DLLs loaded into the address space).
Normally when I see this it's anti-virus, host protection, defragmentation software, backup software, etc., that ends up holding long locks on the files or in clustered environments when the drives aren't properly setup on the back end.
Storage team has excluded these files from anti-virus scanning.
Not trying to be rude, but I'm not buying it. Tell them you want proof. Also, just because the file is "excluded" doesn't mean the anti-virus software doesn't look at it, it still does - just doesn't do all the in-depth checks in most cases.
Now What?
I'd start with checking to see if a rogue application is trying to do something. The problem is that this could happen at any time and offending (if any) application could hold the lock for a short time or for a long time - we don't know.
One of the ways to quickly do this would be to use the sysinternals handle application on the file having the issue. Since this error has an error code in SQL Server for it, you should be able to create an agent alert to execute a job which calls a small batch file or PowerShell or whatever you create to run handle against the file. That should help try to grab the information quickly (but might not be quick enough).
Another way to go about it, especially if you can reproduce it fairly frequently or easy, is to run process monitor (procmon) which is another sysinternals tool to capture what is touching that file other than SQL Server.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f235330%2flog-for-database-tempdb-is-not-available%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
SQLServerLogMgr::LogWriter: Operating system error 170(The requested resource is in use.) encountered.
Yeah, this is bubbled up from the OS error the logwriter is running into. In this case it's OS error 170 which is the resource is in use. That's pretty damning that the issue is outside of SQL Server (barring any bad 3rd party DLLs loaded into the address space).
Normally when I see this it's anti-virus, host protection, defragmentation software, backup software, etc., that ends up holding long locks on the files or in clustered environments when the drives aren't properly setup on the back end.
Storage team has excluded these files from anti-virus scanning.
Not trying to be rude, but I'm not buying it. Tell them you want proof. Also, just because the file is "excluded" doesn't mean the anti-virus software doesn't look at it, it still does - just doesn't do all the in-depth checks in most cases.
Now What?
I'd start with checking to see if a rogue application is trying to do something. The problem is that this could happen at any time and offending (if any) application could hold the lock for a short time or for a long time - we don't know.
One of the ways to quickly do this would be to use the sysinternals handle application on the file having the issue. Since this error has an error code in SQL Server for it, you should be able to create an agent alert to execute a job which calls a small batch file or PowerShell or whatever you create to run handle against the file. That should help try to grab the information quickly (but might not be quick enough).
Another way to go about it, especially if you can reproduce it fairly frequently or easy, is to run process monitor (procmon) which is another sysinternals tool to capture what is touching that file other than SQL Server.
add a comment |
SQLServerLogMgr::LogWriter: Operating system error 170(The requested resource is in use.) encountered.
Yeah, this is bubbled up from the OS error the logwriter is running into. In this case it's OS error 170 which is the resource is in use. That's pretty damning that the issue is outside of SQL Server (barring any bad 3rd party DLLs loaded into the address space).
Normally when I see this it's anti-virus, host protection, defragmentation software, backup software, etc., that ends up holding long locks on the files or in clustered environments when the drives aren't properly setup on the back end.
Storage team has excluded these files from anti-virus scanning.
Not trying to be rude, but I'm not buying it. Tell them you want proof. Also, just because the file is "excluded" doesn't mean the anti-virus software doesn't look at it, it still does - just doesn't do all the in-depth checks in most cases.
Now What?
I'd start with checking to see if a rogue application is trying to do something. The problem is that this could happen at any time and offending (if any) application could hold the lock for a short time or for a long time - we don't know.
One of the ways to quickly do this would be to use the sysinternals handle application on the file having the issue. Since this error has an error code in SQL Server for it, you should be able to create an agent alert to execute a job which calls a small batch file or PowerShell or whatever you create to run handle against the file. That should help try to grab the information quickly (but might not be quick enough).
Another way to go about it, especially if you can reproduce it fairly frequently or easy, is to run process monitor (procmon) which is another sysinternals tool to capture what is touching that file other than SQL Server.
add a comment |
SQLServerLogMgr::LogWriter: Operating system error 170(The requested resource is in use.) encountered.
Yeah, this is bubbled up from the OS error the logwriter is running into. In this case it's OS error 170 which is the resource is in use. That's pretty damning that the issue is outside of SQL Server (barring any bad 3rd party DLLs loaded into the address space).
Normally when I see this it's anti-virus, host protection, defragmentation software, backup software, etc., that ends up holding long locks on the files or in clustered environments when the drives aren't properly setup on the back end.
Storage team has excluded these files from anti-virus scanning.
Not trying to be rude, but I'm not buying it. Tell them you want proof. Also, just because the file is "excluded" doesn't mean the anti-virus software doesn't look at it, it still does - just doesn't do all the in-depth checks in most cases.
Now What?
I'd start with checking to see if a rogue application is trying to do something. The problem is that this could happen at any time and offending (if any) application could hold the lock for a short time or for a long time - we don't know.
One of the ways to quickly do this would be to use the sysinternals handle application on the file having the issue. Since this error has an error code in SQL Server for it, you should be able to create an agent alert to execute a job which calls a small batch file or PowerShell or whatever you create to run handle against the file. That should help try to grab the information quickly (but might not be quick enough).
Another way to go about it, especially if you can reproduce it fairly frequently or easy, is to run process monitor (procmon) which is another sysinternals tool to capture what is touching that file other than SQL Server.
SQLServerLogMgr::LogWriter: Operating system error 170(The requested resource is in use.) encountered.
Yeah, this is bubbled up from the OS error the logwriter is running into. In this case it's OS error 170 which is the resource is in use. That's pretty damning that the issue is outside of SQL Server (barring any bad 3rd party DLLs loaded into the address space).
Normally when I see this it's anti-virus, host protection, defragmentation software, backup software, etc., that ends up holding long locks on the files or in clustered environments when the drives aren't properly setup on the back end.
Storage team has excluded these files from anti-virus scanning.
Not trying to be rude, but I'm not buying it. Tell them you want proof. Also, just because the file is "excluded" doesn't mean the anti-virus software doesn't look at it, it still does - just doesn't do all the in-depth checks in most cases.
Now What?
I'd start with checking to see if a rogue application is trying to do something. The problem is that this could happen at any time and offending (if any) application could hold the lock for a short time or for a long time - we don't know.
One of the ways to quickly do this would be to use the sysinternals handle application on the file having the issue. Since this error has an error code in SQL Server for it, you should be able to create an agent alert to execute a job which calls a small batch file or PowerShell or whatever you create to run handle against the file. That should help try to grab the information quickly (but might not be quick enough).
Another way to go about it, especially if you can reproduce it fairly frequently or easy, is to run process monitor (procmon) which is another sysinternals tool to capture what is touching that file other than SQL Server.
answered Apr 21 at 12:58
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
17.1k22654
17.1k22654
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f235330%2flog-for-database-tempdb-is-not-available%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown