Mrthdrb

Monty Hall Problem-Probability Paradox

How can a team of shapeshifters communicate?

Why do early math courses focus on the cross sections of a cone and not on other 3D objects?

Nose gear failure in single prop aircraft: belly landing or nose-gear up landing?

Is multiple magic items in one inherently imbalanced?

What does the writing on Poe's helmet say?

Universal covering space of the real projective line?

How were pictures turned from film to a big picture in a picture frame before digital scanning?

Did pre-Columbian Americans know the spherical shape of the Earth?

How to change the tick of the color bar legend to black

Getting out of while loop on console

Should a wizard buy fine inks every time he want to copy spells into his spellbook?

Printing attributes of selection in ArcPy?

What is the origin of 落第?

How many time has Arya actually used Needle?

How can I prevent/balance waiting and turtling as a response to cooldown mechanics

Test print coming out spongy

New Order #6: Easter Egg

Rationale for describing kurtosis as "peakedness"?

What would you call this weird metallic apparatus that allows you to lift people?

Did Mueller's report provide an evidentiary basis for the claim of Russian govt election interference via social media?

Does the Mueller report show a conspiracy between Russia and the Trump Campaign?

A `coordinate` command ignored

The test team as an enemy of development? And how can this be avoided?

Changing the prefix of many chords

2

It just occurred to me that the org-babel prefix C-c C-v must be what
it is because of the proximity of c and v in qwerty, and that it
would be better for me to use C-c C-f. Is there a simple way to
change the prefix for all chords using it?

key-bindings

share|improve this question

asked Apr 16 at 11:10

ToothrotToothrot

871412

add a comment | 

2

It just occurred to me that the org-babel prefix C-c C-v must be what
it is because of the proximity of c and v in qwerty, and that it
would be better for me to use C-c C-f. Is there a simple way to
change the prefix for all chords using it?

key-bindings

share|improve this question

asked Apr 16 at 11:10

ToothrotToothrot

871412

add a comment | 

It just occurred to me that the org-babel prefix C-c C-v must be what
it is because of the proximity of c and v in qwerty, and that it
would be better for me to use C-c C-f. Is there a simple way to
change the prefix for all chords using it?

key-bindings

share|improve this question

asked Apr 16 at 11:10

ToothrotToothrot

871412

share|improve this question

asked Apr 16 at 11:10

ToothrotToothrot

871412

share|improve this question

asked Apr 16 at 11:10

ToothrotToothrot

871412

asked Apr 16 at 11:10

ToothrotToothrot

871412

asked Apr 16 at 11:10

ToothrotToothrot

871412

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

4

If you really want to override the binding C-c C-f for org-forward-heading-same-level you can do that as follows.

(defvar org-C-c-C-v (lookup-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-v"))
 "Binding of C-c C-v in Orgmode.")
(defvar org-C-c-C-f (lookup-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-f"))
 "Binding of C-c C-f in Orgmode.")

(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-f") org-C-c-C-v)
(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-v") nil)

One could also avoid the variables org-C-c-C-v and org-C-c-C-f by substituting their values into the first define-key and by ignoring the value of the original binding for C-c C-f. The variables give you the possibility to easily switch back to the original state without reloading org.

Note that the usage of defvar is kind of protection of the original binding value. When you have already the modified bindings through running the code once and reevaluate the code the values of org-C-c-C-v and org-C-c-C-f are not overwritten by the new bindings because of the special behavior of defvar (see its doc).

You can switch back to the original bindings with:

(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-f") org-C-c-C-f)
(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-v") org-C-c-C-v)

share|improve this answer

edited Apr 16 at 12:12

answered Apr 16 at 12:03

TobiasTobias

15.4k11035

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "583"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2femacs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48956%2fchanging-the-prefix-of-many-chords%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

4

If you really want to override the binding C-c C-f for org-forward-heading-same-level you can do that as follows.

(defvar org-C-c-C-v (lookup-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-v"))
 "Binding of C-c C-v in Orgmode.")
(defvar org-C-c-C-f (lookup-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-f"))
 "Binding of C-c C-f in Orgmode.")

(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-f") org-C-c-C-v)
(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-v") nil)

One could also avoid the variables org-C-c-C-v and org-C-c-C-f by substituting their values into the first define-key and by ignoring the value of the original binding for C-c C-f. The variables give you the possibility to easily switch back to the original state without reloading org.

Note that the usage of defvar is kind of protection of the original binding value. When you have already the modified bindings through running the code once and reevaluate the code the values of org-C-c-C-v and org-C-c-C-f are not overwritten by the new bindings because of the special behavior of defvar (see its doc).

You can switch back to the original bindings with:

(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-f") org-C-c-C-f)
(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-v") org-C-c-C-v)

share|improve this answer

edited Apr 16 at 12:12

answered Apr 16 at 12:03

TobiasTobias

15.4k11035

add a comment | 

4

If you really want to override the binding C-c C-f for org-forward-heading-same-level you can do that as follows.

(defvar org-C-c-C-v (lookup-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-v"))
 "Binding of C-c C-v in Orgmode.")
(defvar org-C-c-C-f (lookup-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-f"))
 "Binding of C-c C-f in Orgmode.")

(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-f") org-C-c-C-v)
(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-v") nil)

One could also avoid the variables org-C-c-C-v and org-C-c-C-f by substituting their values into the first define-key and by ignoring the value of the original binding for C-c C-f. The variables give you the possibility to easily switch back to the original state without reloading org.

Note that the usage of defvar is kind of protection of the original binding value. When you have already the modified bindings through running the code once and reevaluate the code the values of org-C-c-C-v and org-C-c-C-f are not overwritten by the new bindings because of the special behavior of defvar (see its doc).

You can switch back to the original bindings with:

(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-f") org-C-c-C-f)
(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-v") org-C-c-C-v)

share|improve this answer

edited Apr 16 at 12:12

answered Apr 16 at 12:03

TobiasTobias

15.4k11035

add a comment | 

If you really want to override the binding C-c C-f for org-forward-heading-same-level you can do that as follows.

(defvar org-C-c-C-v (lookup-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-v"))
 "Binding of C-c C-v in Orgmode.")
(defvar org-C-c-C-f (lookup-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-f"))
 "Binding of C-c C-f in Orgmode.")

(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-f") org-C-c-C-v)
(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-v") nil)

One could also avoid the variables org-C-c-C-v and org-C-c-C-f by substituting their values into the first define-key and by ignoring the value of the original binding for C-c C-f. The variables give you the possibility to easily switch back to the original state without reloading org.

Note that the usage of defvar is kind of protection of the original binding value. When you have already the modified bindings through running the code once and reevaluate the code the values of org-C-c-C-v and org-C-c-C-f are not overwritten by the new bindings because of the special behavior of defvar (see its doc).

You can switch back to the original bindings with:

(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-f") org-C-c-C-f)
(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-v") org-C-c-C-v)

share|improve this answer

edited Apr 16 at 12:12

answered Apr 16 at 12:03

TobiasTobias

15.4k11035

(defvar org-C-c-C-v (lookup-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-v"))
 "Binding of C-c C-v in Orgmode.")
(defvar org-C-c-C-f (lookup-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-f"))
 "Binding of C-c C-f in Orgmode.")

(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-f") org-C-c-C-v)
(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-v") nil)

(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-f") org-C-c-C-f)
(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-v") org-C-c-C-v)

share|improve this answer

edited Apr 16 at 12:12

answered Apr 16 at 12:03

TobiasTobias

15.4k11035

answered Apr 16 at 12:03

TobiasTobias

15.4k11035

answered Apr 16 at 12:03

TobiasTobias

15.4k11035