Why didn't this character “real die” when they blew their stack out in Altered Carbon? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Favourite questions and answers from the 1st quarter of 2019How/Why did Tyler Durden got shot in the head?Why didn't Gazelle die when Merlin detonates the security chips?Why did this character simply die in Deadgirl (2008)?Why didn't they take their prisoners to the extraction point?Why didn't Daenerys order this character to stay out of the fight?Why is “double-sleeving” a crime in Altered Carbon?Where do empty 'natural' Sleeves come from?In Altered carbon S01E05, why does Ortega bother with taking Dimi's head outside the hotel?Did this character die while fighting Thanos?Why does this character die?

Co-worker has annoying ringtone

How were pictures turned from film to a big picture in a picture frame before digital scanning?

A proverb that is used to imply that you have unexpectedly faced a big problem

Monty Hall Problem-Probability Paradox

Relating to the President and obstruction, were Mueller's conclusions preordained?

What does Turing mean by this statement?

How do living politicians protect their readily obtainable signatures from misuse?

Nose gear failure in single prop aircraft: belly landing or nose-gear up landing?

i2c bus hangs in master RPi access to MSP430G uC ~1 in 1000 accesses

What initially awakened the Balrog?

Is it possible for SQL statements to execute concurrently within a single session in SQL Server?

Should a wizard buy fine inks every time he want to copy spells into his spellbook?

Can you force honesty by using the Speak with Dead and Zone of Truth spells together?

What would you call this weird metallic apparatus that allows you to lift people?

Simple HTTP Server

One-one communication

Why BitLocker does not use RSA

Why not send Voyager 3 and 4 following up the paths taken by Voyager 1 and 2 to re-transmit signals of later as they fly away from Earth?

White walkers, cemeteries and wights

Asymptotics question

Did Mueller's report provide an evidentiary basis for the claim of Russian govt election interference via social media?

Does the Mueller report show a conspiracy between Russia and the Trump Campaign?

Constant factor of an array

I can't produce songs



Why didn't this character “real die” when they blew their stack out in Altered Carbon?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Favourite questions and answers from the 1st quarter of 2019How/Why did Tyler Durden got shot in the head?Why didn't Gazelle die when Merlin detonates the security chips?Why did this character simply die in Deadgirl (2008)?Why didn't they take their prisoners to the extraction point?Why didn't Daenerys order this character to stay out of the fight?Why is “double-sleeving” a crime in Altered Carbon?Where do empty 'natural' Sleeves come from?In Altered carbon S01E05, why does Ortega bother with taking Dimi's head outside the hotel?Did this character die while fighting Thanos?Why does this character die?










13















WARNING: Spoilers ahead.




In Altered Carbon, Bancroft kills himself by shooting himself in the stack, I.E: a bullet to the front of the neck.




From what I understand, if someone "dies" and their stack is intact, they could be "spun back up".



He not only killed himself but he also destroyed his stack, meaning it should have "real killed" him, I.E: dead forever.



Why is it that he was able to come back after he "died", was that "him" or was that just a clone of him.



If it was a clone, was it "him" or just a "previous version" of himself, in other words, could he be held accountable for the actions of his (now dead) clone?










share|improve this question
























  • I have a tip: Read the book. Don't take this some smart comment - it's not intended as such. It's just that, as is often the case with book adaptations, the book is sooo much better. The answers to both of the questions you have asked about Altered Carbon are quite evident in the book.

    – SiHa
    Apr 17 at 10:08















13















WARNING: Spoilers ahead.




In Altered Carbon, Bancroft kills himself by shooting himself in the stack, I.E: a bullet to the front of the neck.




From what I understand, if someone "dies" and their stack is intact, they could be "spun back up".



He not only killed himself but he also destroyed his stack, meaning it should have "real killed" him, I.E: dead forever.



Why is it that he was able to come back after he "died", was that "him" or was that just a clone of him.



If it was a clone, was it "him" or just a "previous version" of himself, in other words, could he be held accountable for the actions of his (now dead) clone?










share|improve this question
























  • I have a tip: Read the book. Don't take this some smart comment - it's not intended as such. It's just that, as is often the case with book adaptations, the book is sooo much better. The answers to both of the questions you have asked about Altered Carbon are quite evident in the book.

    – SiHa
    Apr 17 at 10:08













13












13








13


1






WARNING: Spoilers ahead.




In Altered Carbon, Bancroft kills himself by shooting himself in the stack, I.E: a bullet to the front of the neck.




From what I understand, if someone "dies" and their stack is intact, they could be "spun back up".



He not only killed himself but he also destroyed his stack, meaning it should have "real killed" him, I.E: dead forever.



Why is it that he was able to come back after he "died", was that "him" or was that just a clone of him.



If it was a clone, was it "him" or just a "previous version" of himself, in other words, could he be held accountable for the actions of his (now dead) clone?










share|improve this question
















WARNING: Spoilers ahead.




In Altered Carbon, Bancroft kills himself by shooting himself in the stack, I.E: a bullet to the front of the neck.




From what I understand, if someone "dies" and their stack is intact, they could be "spun back up".



He not only killed himself but he also destroyed his stack, meaning it should have "real killed" him, I.E: dead forever.



Why is it that he was able to come back after he "died", was that "him" or was that just a clone of him.



If it was a clone, was it "him" or just a "previous version" of himself, in other words, could he be held accountable for the actions of his (now dead) clone?







plot-explanation altered-carbon






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 16 at 17:02









justhalf

1033




1033










asked Apr 16 at 10:05









LogicalBranchLogicalBranch

337213




337213












  • I have a tip: Read the book. Don't take this some smart comment - it's not intended as such. It's just that, as is often the case with book adaptations, the book is sooo much better. The answers to both of the questions you have asked about Altered Carbon are quite evident in the book.

    – SiHa
    Apr 17 at 10:08

















  • I have a tip: Read the book. Don't take this some smart comment - it's not intended as such. It's just that, as is often the case with book adaptations, the book is sooo much better. The answers to both of the questions you have asked about Altered Carbon are quite evident in the book.

    – SiHa
    Apr 17 at 10:08
















I have a tip: Read the book. Don't take this some smart comment - it's not intended as such. It's just that, as is often the case with book adaptations, the book is sooo much better. The answers to both of the questions you have asked about Altered Carbon are quite evident in the book.

– SiHa
Apr 17 at 10:08





I have a tip: Read the book. Don't take this some smart comment - it's not intended as such. It's just that, as is often the case with book adaptations, the book is sooo much better. The answers to both of the questions you have asked about Altered Carbon are quite evident in the book.

– SiHa
Apr 17 at 10:08










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















25














The REAL (or at least "current") Bancroft did die but was almost instantly re-sleeved into a cloned body and a backup of his stack on a satellite.



Unfortunately, the backup was missing the last two days of Bancroft's memories which, conveniently for the plot, included his own self-termination.




One of the sticking points of the mystery was the fact that Bancroft was killed with a gun that only himself and his wife, Miriam Bancroft (Kristin Lehman) had access to - leading some to dismiss the death as an attempted suicide.



Bancroft, in his arrogance, didn't think it possible that he would ever commit suicide, and in a way he was right. The shooting was not an attempt at real death, but instead merely a way of wiping his memory of a horrible crime, so that he wouldn't have to live with the guilt.



ScreenRant







share|improve this answer

























  • It should have been obvious that it wasn't an attempt at a real death, since he knew full well that a backup existed.

    – Acccumulation
    Apr 16 at 20:50






  • 2





    @Acccumulation It's been a while since I've seen the season, but wasn't there evidence that someone tried to destroy his backups as well but didn't succeed in doing so?

    – DeeV
    Apr 16 at 22:12


















3














The stack was merely a storage medium - one of the plot points in altered carbon was folks were transmitted as data as a means of interplanetary transport, and the rich (and military) had backups they could restore as needed into sleeves. There's also cases where there's more than one copy - its illegal but both Dimi the Twin and the protagonist have them in various parts of the story.



Pretty much, in the altered carbon universe, death is mostly meaningless - if you have money. A blown out stack kills that instance of you if you're too poor for backups, but the rich can back themselves up and pretty much not even worry about a blown out stack.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Aibobot is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    25














    The REAL (or at least "current") Bancroft did die but was almost instantly re-sleeved into a cloned body and a backup of his stack on a satellite.



    Unfortunately, the backup was missing the last two days of Bancroft's memories which, conveniently for the plot, included his own self-termination.




    One of the sticking points of the mystery was the fact that Bancroft was killed with a gun that only himself and his wife, Miriam Bancroft (Kristin Lehman) had access to - leading some to dismiss the death as an attempted suicide.



    Bancroft, in his arrogance, didn't think it possible that he would ever commit suicide, and in a way he was right. The shooting was not an attempt at real death, but instead merely a way of wiping his memory of a horrible crime, so that he wouldn't have to live with the guilt.



    ScreenRant







    share|improve this answer

























    • It should have been obvious that it wasn't an attempt at a real death, since he knew full well that a backup existed.

      – Acccumulation
      Apr 16 at 20:50






    • 2





      @Acccumulation It's been a while since I've seen the season, but wasn't there evidence that someone tried to destroy his backups as well but didn't succeed in doing so?

      – DeeV
      Apr 16 at 22:12















    25














    The REAL (or at least "current") Bancroft did die but was almost instantly re-sleeved into a cloned body and a backup of his stack on a satellite.



    Unfortunately, the backup was missing the last two days of Bancroft's memories which, conveniently for the plot, included his own self-termination.




    One of the sticking points of the mystery was the fact that Bancroft was killed with a gun that only himself and his wife, Miriam Bancroft (Kristin Lehman) had access to - leading some to dismiss the death as an attempted suicide.



    Bancroft, in his arrogance, didn't think it possible that he would ever commit suicide, and in a way he was right. The shooting was not an attempt at real death, but instead merely a way of wiping his memory of a horrible crime, so that he wouldn't have to live with the guilt.



    ScreenRant







    share|improve this answer

























    • It should have been obvious that it wasn't an attempt at a real death, since he knew full well that a backup existed.

      – Acccumulation
      Apr 16 at 20:50






    • 2





      @Acccumulation It's been a while since I've seen the season, but wasn't there evidence that someone tried to destroy his backups as well but didn't succeed in doing so?

      – DeeV
      Apr 16 at 22:12













    25












    25








    25







    The REAL (or at least "current") Bancroft did die but was almost instantly re-sleeved into a cloned body and a backup of his stack on a satellite.



    Unfortunately, the backup was missing the last two days of Bancroft's memories which, conveniently for the plot, included his own self-termination.




    One of the sticking points of the mystery was the fact that Bancroft was killed with a gun that only himself and his wife, Miriam Bancroft (Kristin Lehman) had access to - leading some to dismiss the death as an attempted suicide.



    Bancroft, in his arrogance, didn't think it possible that he would ever commit suicide, and in a way he was right. The shooting was not an attempt at real death, but instead merely a way of wiping his memory of a horrible crime, so that he wouldn't have to live with the guilt.



    ScreenRant







    share|improve this answer















    The REAL (or at least "current") Bancroft did die but was almost instantly re-sleeved into a cloned body and a backup of his stack on a satellite.



    Unfortunately, the backup was missing the last two days of Bancroft's memories which, conveniently for the plot, included his own self-termination.




    One of the sticking points of the mystery was the fact that Bancroft was killed with a gun that only himself and his wife, Miriam Bancroft (Kristin Lehman) had access to - leading some to dismiss the death as an attempted suicide.



    Bancroft, in his arrogance, didn't think it possible that he would ever commit suicide, and in a way he was right. The shooting was not an attempt at real death, but instead merely a way of wiping his memory of a horrible crime, so that he wouldn't have to live with the guilt.



    ScreenRant








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Apr 16 at 14:52

























    answered Apr 16 at 10:33









    Paulie_DPaulie_D

    89.7k18319294




    89.7k18319294












    • It should have been obvious that it wasn't an attempt at a real death, since he knew full well that a backup existed.

      – Acccumulation
      Apr 16 at 20:50






    • 2





      @Acccumulation It's been a while since I've seen the season, but wasn't there evidence that someone tried to destroy his backups as well but didn't succeed in doing so?

      – DeeV
      Apr 16 at 22:12

















    • It should have been obvious that it wasn't an attempt at a real death, since he knew full well that a backup existed.

      – Acccumulation
      Apr 16 at 20:50






    • 2





      @Acccumulation It's been a while since I've seen the season, but wasn't there evidence that someone tried to destroy his backups as well but didn't succeed in doing so?

      – DeeV
      Apr 16 at 22:12
















    It should have been obvious that it wasn't an attempt at a real death, since he knew full well that a backup existed.

    – Acccumulation
    Apr 16 at 20:50





    It should have been obvious that it wasn't an attempt at a real death, since he knew full well that a backup existed.

    – Acccumulation
    Apr 16 at 20:50




    2




    2





    @Acccumulation It's been a while since I've seen the season, but wasn't there evidence that someone tried to destroy his backups as well but didn't succeed in doing so?

    – DeeV
    Apr 16 at 22:12





    @Acccumulation It's been a while since I've seen the season, but wasn't there evidence that someone tried to destroy his backups as well but didn't succeed in doing so?

    – DeeV
    Apr 16 at 22:12











    3














    The stack was merely a storage medium - one of the plot points in altered carbon was folks were transmitted as data as a means of interplanetary transport, and the rich (and military) had backups they could restore as needed into sleeves. There's also cases where there's more than one copy - its illegal but both Dimi the Twin and the protagonist have them in various parts of the story.



    Pretty much, in the altered carbon universe, death is mostly meaningless - if you have money. A blown out stack kills that instance of you if you're too poor for backups, but the rich can back themselves up and pretty much not even worry about a blown out stack.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Aibobot is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.
























      3














      The stack was merely a storage medium - one of the plot points in altered carbon was folks were transmitted as data as a means of interplanetary transport, and the rich (and military) had backups they could restore as needed into sleeves. There's also cases where there's more than one copy - its illegal but both Dimi the Twin and the protagonist have them in various parts of the story.



      Pretty much, in the altered carbon universe, death is mostly meaningless - if you have money. A blown out stack kills that instance of you if you're too poor for backups, but the rich can back themselves up and pretty much not even worry about a blown out stack.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      Aibobot is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















        3












        3








        3







        The stack was merely a storage medium - one of the plot points in altered carbon was folks were transmitted as data as a means of interplanetary transport, and the rich (and military) had backups they could restore as needed into sleeves. There's also cases where there's more than one copy - its illegal but both Dimi the Twin and the protagonist have them in various parts of the story.



        Pretty much, in the altered carbon universe, death is mostly meaningless - if you have money. A blown out stack kills that instance of you if you're too poor for backups, but the rich can back themselves up and pretty much not even worry about a blown out stack.






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        Aibobot is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.










        The stack was merely a storage medium - one of the plot points in altered carbon was folks were transmitted as data as a means of interplanetary transport, and the rich (and military) had backups they could restore as needed into sleeves. There's also cases where there's more than one copy - its illegal but both Dimi the Twin and the protagonist have them in various parts of the story.



        Pretty much, in the altered carbon universe, death is mostly meaningless - if you have money. A blown out stack kills that instance of you if you're too poor for backups, but the rich can back themselves up and pretty much not even worry about a blown out stack.







        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        Aibobot is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Apr 17 at 4:36









        A J

        42.5k16229244




        42.5k16229244






        New contributor




        Aibobot is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered Apr 17 at 1:17









        AibobotAibobot

        1312




        1312




        New contributor




        Aibobot is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        Aibobot is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        Aibobot is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.













            Popular posts from this blog

            Sum ergo cogito? 1 nng

            三茅街道4182Guuntc Dn precexpngmageondP