Checking @@ROWCOUNT failingUsing SSIS to get record counts for tables that may not existHandling exceptions in stored procedures called using insert-exec blocksSQL 2005 Unused proceduresDuplicate records in primary key during big selectHandling exceptions with INSERT-EXEC with linked server stored proc and table resultsBulk insert and fast ordered search large data 3B+ recordsExpensive Insert Operation pause Other Insert OperationProblems with insert trigger and primary keyImplicit conversion causing error part of the timeINSERT/SELECT xml column from one table to another

Is there a RAID 0 Equivalent for RAM?

If A is dense in Q, then it must be dense in R.

Do I have to take mana from my deck or hand when tapping a dual land?

Unable to disable Microsoft Store in domain environment

In One Punch Man, is King actually weak?

How to write Quadratic equation with negative coefficient

Isometric embedding of a genus g surface

Showing mass murder in a kid's book

Should I warn a new PhD Student?

Is there a reason to prefer HFS+ over APFS for disk images in High Sierra and/or Mojave?

The Digit Triangles

Deciphering cause of death?

PTIJ: does fasting on Ta'anis Esther give us reward as if we celebrated 2 Purims? (similar to Yom Kippur)

How do you justify more code being written by following clean code practices?

ContourPlot — How do I color by contour curvature?

Ways of geometrical multiplication

If the only attacker is removed from combat, is a creature still counted as having attacked this turn?

Why is the principal energy of an electron lower for excited electrons in a higher energy state?

Why do Radio Buttons not fill the entire outer circle?

Can I say "fingers" when referring to toes?

Air travel with refrigerated insulin

If Captain Marvel (MCU) were to have a child with a human male, would the child be human or Kree?

Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks

How to leave product feedback on macOS?



Checking @@ROWCOUNT failing


Using SSIS to get record counts for tables that may not existHandling exceptions in stored procedures called using insert-exec blocksSQL 2005 Unused proceduresDuplicate records in primary key during big selectHandling exceptions with INSERT-EXEC with linked server stored proc and table resultsBulk insert and fast ordered search large data 3B+ recordsExpensive Insert Operation pause Other Insert OperationProblems with insert trigger and primary keyImplicit conversion causing error part of the timeINSERT/SELECT xml column from one table to another













3















I have a code similar to the one below in one of my SQL procedures,



declare @rowcount int

update table1
set value = @value
where id = @id

select @rowcount = @@ROWCOUNT

if ( @rowcount = 0 )
begin
insert into table1(id, value1,value2...)
select (@id, @value1, @value2...)
end


But it fails rarely, like once in a day etc. That means the data exists in the table and @@rowcount is 0 and it tried to insert data and primary key violation happening. Here all values which are inserting ie. id,value1,value2 etc are integers. Any thoughts?










share|improve this question









New contributor




blue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    3















    I have a code similar to the one below in one of my SQL procedures,



    declare @rowcount int

    update table1
    set value = @value
    where id = @id

    select @rowcount = @@ROWCOUNT

    if ( @rowcount = 0 )
    begin
    insert into table1(id, value1,value2...)
    select (@id, @value1, @value2...)
    end


    But it fails rarely, like once in a day etc. That means the data exists in the table and @@rowcount is 0 and it tried to insert data and primary key violation happening. Here all values which are inserting ie. id,value1,value2 etc are integers. Any thoughts?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    blue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      3












      3








      3


      1






      I have a code similar to the one below in one of my SQL procedures,



      declare @rowcount int

      update table1
      set value = @value
      where id = @id

      select @rowcount = @@ROWCOUNT

      if ( @rowcount = 0 )
      begin
      insert into table1(id, value1,value2...)
      select (@id, @value1, @value2...)
      end


      But it fails rarely, like once in a day etc. That means the data exists in the table and @@rowcount is 0 and it tried to insert data and primary key violation happening. Here all values which are inserting ie. id,value1,value2 etc are integers. Any thoughts?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      blue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      I have a code similar to the one below in one of my SQL procedures,



      declare @rowcount int

      update table1
      set value = @value
      where id = @id

      select @rowcount = @@ROWCOUNT

      if ( @rowcount = 0 )
      begin
      insert into table1(id, value1,value2...)
      select (@id, @value1, @value2...)
      end


      But it fails rarely, like once in a day etc. That means the data exists in the table and @@rowcount is 0 and it tried to insert data and primary key violation happening. Here all values which are inserting ie. id,value1,value2 etc are integers. Any thoughts?







      sql-server locking primary-key






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      blue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      blue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 7 hours ago









      Aaron Bertrand

      153k18296492




      153k18296492






      New contributor




      blue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked yesterday









      blueblue

      1192




      1192




      New contributor




      blue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      blue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      blue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          13














          I'm not sure why you're using a variable, but you need to protect multiple statements with a transaction. What's happening is two users are calling the procedure at the same time, both are getting rowcount = 0, and then they're both trying to insert as a result.



          set transaction isolation level serializable;
          begin transaction;

          update dbo.table1
          set value = @value
          where id = @id;

          if (@@ROWCOUNT = 0)
          begin
          insert dbo.table1(id, value1,value2...)
          values(@id, @value1, @value2...);
          end

          commit transaction;





          share|improve this answer























          • Appreciate your answers! How about using IF EXISTS (select top 1 1 from table1 where id @id) then update and else Insert?

            – blue
            10 hours ago






          • 1





            @blue that pattern requires an extra access to the table (in the case where it exists). IF EXISTS essentially does the exact same thing the update does to try to locate the row - why do that twice?

            – Aaron Bertrand
            8 hours ago










          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "182"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          blue is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f232558%2fchecking-rowcount-failing%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          13














          I'm not sure why you're using a variable, but you need to protect multiple statements with a transaction. What's happening is two users are calling the procedure at the same time, both are getting rowcount = 0, and then they're both trying to insert as a result.



          set transaction isolation level serializable;
          begin transaction;

          update dbo.table1
          set value = @value
          where id = @id;

          if (@@ROWCOUNT = 0)
          begin
          insert dbo.table1(id, value1,value2...)
          values(@id, @value1, @value2...);
          end

          commit transaction;





          share|improve this answer























          • Appreciate your answers! How about using IF EXISTS (select top 1 1 from table1 where id @id) then update and else Insert?

            – blue
            10 hours ago






          • 1





            @blue that pattern requires an extra access to the table (in the case where it exists). IF EXISTS essentially does the exact same thing the update does to try to locate the row - why do that twice?

            – Aaron Bertrand
            8 hours ago















          13














          I'm not sure why you're using a variable, but you need to protect multiple statements with a transaction. What's happening is two users are calling the procedure at the same time, both are getting rowcount = 0, and then they're both trying to insert as a result.



          set transaction isolation level serializable;
          begin transaction;

          update dbo.table1
          set value = @value
          where id = @id;

          if (@@ROWCOUNT = 0)
          begin
          insert dbo.table1(id, value1,value2...)
          values(@id, @value1, @value2...);
          end

          commit transaction;





          share|improve this answer























          • Appreciate your answers! How about using IF EXISTS (select top 1 1 from table1 where id @id) then update and else Insert?

            – blue
            10 hours ago






          • 1





            @blue that pattern requires an extra access to the table (in the case where it exists). IF EXISTS essentially does the exact same thing the update does to try to locate the row - why do that twice?

            – Aaron Bertrand
            8 hours ago













          13












          13








          13







          I'm not sure why you're using a variable, but you need to protect multiple statements with a transaction. What's happening is two users are calling the procedure at the same time, both are getting rowcount = 0, and then they're both trying to insert as a result.



          set transaction isolation level serializable;
          begin transaction;

          update dbo.table1
          set value = @value
          where id = @id;

          if (@@ROWCOUNT = 0)
          begin
          insert dbo.table1(id, value1,value2...)
          values(@id, @value1, @value2...);
          end

          commit transaction;





          share|improve this answer













          I'm not sure why you're using a variable, but you need to protect multiple statements with a transaction. What's happening is two users are calling the procedure at the same time, both are getting rowcount = 0, and then they're both trying to insert as a result.



          set transaction isolation level serializable;
          begin transaction;

          update dbo.table1
          set value = @value
          where id = @id;

          if (@@ROWCOUNT = 0)
          begin
          insert dbo.table1(id, value1,value2...)
          values(@id, @value1, @value2...);
          end

          commit transaction;






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          Aaron BertrandAaron Bertrand

          153k18296492




          153k18296492












          • Appreciate your answers! How about using IF EXISTS (select top 1 1 from table1 where id @id) then update and else Insert?

            – blue
            10 hours ago






          • 1





            @blue that pattern requires an extra access to the table (in the case where it exists). IF EXISTS essentially does the exact same thing the update does to try to locate the row - why do that twice?

            – Aaron Bertrand
            8 hours ago

















          • Appreciate your answers! How about using IF EXISTS (select top 1 1 from table1 where id @id) then update and else Insert?

            – blue
            10 hours ago






          • 1





            @blue that pattern requires an extra access to the table (in the case where it exists). IF EXISTS essentially does the exact same thing the update does to try to locate the row - why do that twice?

            – Aaron Bertrand
            8 hours ago
















          Appreciate your answers! How about using IF EXISTS (select top 1 1 from table1 where id @id) then update and else Insert?

          – blue
          10 hours ago





          Appreciate your answers! How about using IF EXISTS (select top 1 1 from table1 where id @id) then update and else Insert?

          – blue
          10 hours ago




          1




          1





          @blue that pattern requires an extra access to the table (in the case where it exists). IF EXISTS essentially does the exact same thing the update does to try to locate the row - why do that twice?

          – Aaron Bertrand
          8 hours ago





          @blue that pattern requires an extra access to the table (in the case where it exists). IF EXISTS essentially does the exact same thing the update does to try to locate the row - why do that twice?

          – Aaron Bertrand
          8 hours ago










          blue is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          blue is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          blue is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          blue is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f232558%2fchecking-rowcount-failing%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Bulk add to cart function issuecart vs. mini cart issue … rwd themeRedirect Add to cart button to cart pageAdd to cart issue - Magento 2.1The requested Payment Method is not available When creating an orderM2: reason add-to-cart might not function in production modeAdd to cart issue in some android devicesMagento 2 - custom price can not add to subtotal and grand total after add to cartAdd to cart codeIssue with my cart module on pdp and cart pages, just keeps spinningBulk price and quantity update using rest api

          Magento2 - How to hide price filter only in specific categories?Multiselect price filter attribute in layered navigationhide only some categories from layered navigation in magentoRemove Price Filter on certain categoriescustomize layered price filter?Hide Price for a particular customer groupPrice filter in layered navigation not working correctly with price including tax in magento 2.2.3Magento 2 how to hide attribute at Layered navigation?Magento 2. how to hide price only for specific categoriesMagento 2 How can I hide the price and total from cart and checkout summary?Magento2: Can we add navigation layered filter like price filter for other attribute?