If a character has darkvision, can they see through an area of nonmagical darkness filled with lightly obscuring gas?Does skulker remove the attack penalty for targeting creatures in low-light? Also, does that stack with Darkvision?Which is the correct rules text for Darkvision?Attempting to Replace DarkvisionInteraction between perception and stealth in obscured conditionsWith the Skulker feat, can you hide in the cover of darkness even against creatures with darkvision?What does the UA ranger's Underdark Scout feature do?How does dim light affect passive perception?Obscurement encounter advice with size differencesWhat’s the interaction between darkvision and the Eagle Aspect of the beast?Can characters who can't see move through an area just as easily as characters who can see?
How to color a curve
Open a doc from terminal, but not by its name
Reply 'no position' while the job posting is still there
Greco-Roman egalitarianism
Fly on a jet pack vs fly with a jet pack?
Divine apple island
Do the concepts of IP address and network interface not belong to the same layer?
When quoting, must I also copy hyphens used to divide words that continue on the next line?
Why does Async/Await work properly when the loop is inside the async function and not the other way around?
Customize circled numbers
Freedom of speech and where it applies
Java - What do constructor type arguments mean when placed *before* the type?
Bob has never been a M before
Difference between -| and |- in TikZ
How do I repair my stair bannister?
Why does the integral domain "being trapped between a finite field extension" implies that it is a field?
Proof of Lemma: Every nonzero integer can be written as a product of primes
Will adding a BY-SA image to a blog post make the entire post BY-SA?
Can a significant change in incentives void an employment contract?
Proving a function is onto where f(x)=|x|.
Visiting the UK as unmarried couple
What linear sensor for a keyboard?
Has Darkwing Duck ever met Scrooge McDuck?
What (else) happened July 1st 1858 in London?
If a character has darkvision, can they see through an area of nonmagical darkness filled with lightly obscuring gas?
Does skulker remove the attack penalty for targeting creatures in low-light? Also, does that stack with Darkvision?Which is the correct rules text for Darkvision?Attempting to Replace DarkvisionInteraction between perception and stealth in obscured conditionsWith the Skulker feat, can you hide in the cover of darkness even against creatures with darkvision?What does the UA ranger's Underdark Scout feature do?How does dim light affect passive perception?Obscurement encounter advice with size differencesWhat’s the interaction between darkvision and the Eagle Aspect of the beast?Can characters who can't see move through an area just as easily as characters who can see?
$begingroup$
I'm running a premade campaign which states that all the rooms are filled with a gas that makes the whole area lightly obscured (disadvantage on Perception checks).
A character with darkvision without light, treats areas of mundane darkness as dim light. Dim light counts as lightly obscured as well.
What happens if there is something beyond the reach of light, but within his darkvision range? Is it heavily obscured for him (lightly obscured [darkness -> dim] + lightly obscured [gas] = heavily obscured)?
dnd-5e vision-and-light
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm running a premade campaign which states that all the rooms are filled with a gas that makes the whole area lightly obscured (disadvantage on Perception checks).
A character with darkvision without light, treats areas of mundane darkness as dim light. Dim light counts as lightly obscured as well.
What happens if there is something beyond the reach of light, but within his darkvision range? Is it heavily obscured for him (lightly obscured [darkness -> dim] + lightly obscured [gas] = heavily obscured)?
dnd-5e vision-and-light
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I read the premise as being that the character (or whatever they're trying to perceive) is in darkness, which they can treat as dim light because of darkvision, but also in a lightly-obscured fog. The question is perhaps really about how to adjudicate the combination of different factors which all contribute to obscuring vision - does lightly-obscured + lightly-obscured = heavily-obscured?
$endgroup$
– Carcer
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Bandaro thanks for the checkmark, but do note that you can always switch it to another answer later if another more helpful one comes in, and sometimes it is even good to wait a bit before giving it out. Of course, the choice is completely yours.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose I found your answer very clear and so I checkmarked it quite soon. But I will check back later to see if other people agree or disagree.
$endgroup$
– Bandaro
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm running a premade campaign which states that all the rooms are filled with a gas that makes the whole area lightly obscured (disadvantage on Perception checks).
A character with darkvision without light, treats areas of mundane darkness as dim light. Dim light counts as lightly obscured as well.
What happens if there is something beyond the reach of light, but within his darkvision range? Is it heavily obscured for him (lightly obscured [darkness -> dim] + lightly obscured [gas] = heavily obscured)?
dnd-5e vision-and-light
New contributor
$endgroup$
I'm running a premade campaign which states that all the rooms are filled with a gas that makes the whole area lightly obscured (disadvantage on Perception checks).
A character with darkvision without light, treats areas of mundane darkness as dim light. Dim light counts as lightly obscured as well.
What happens if there is something beyond the reach of light, but within his darkvision range? Is it heavily obscured for him (lightly obscured [darkness -> dim] + lightly obscured [gas] = heavily obscured)?
dnd-5e vision-and-light
dnd-5e vision-and-light
New contributor
New contributor
edited yesterday
V2Blast
25.5k486156
25.5k486156
New contributor
asked yesterday
BandaroBandaro
584
584
New contributor
New contributor
1
$begingroup$
I read the premise as being that the character (or whatever they're trying to perceive) is in darkness, which they can treat as dim light because of darkvision, but also in a lightly-obscured fog. The question is perhaps really about how to adjudicate the combination of different factors which all contribute to obscuring vision - does lightly-obscured + lightly-obscured = heavily-obscured?
$endgroup$
– Carcer
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Bandaro thanks for the checkmark, but do note that you can always switch it to another answer later if another more helpful one comes in, and sometimes it is even good to wait a bit before giving it out. Of course, the choice is completely yours.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose I found your answer very clear and so I checkmarked it quite soon. But I will check back later to see if other people agree or disagree.
$endgroup$
– Bandaro
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
yesterday
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
I read the premise as being that the character (or whatever they're trying to perceive) is in darkness, which they can treat as dim light because of darkvision, but also in a lightly-obscured fog. The question is perhaps really about how to adjudicate the combination of different factors which all contribute to obscuring vision - does lightly-obscured + lightly-obscured = heavily-obscured?
$endgroup$
– Carcer
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Bandaro thanks for the checkmark, but do note that you can always switch it to another answer later if another more helpful one comes in, and sometimes it is even good to wait a bit before giving it out. Of course, the choice is completely yours.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose I found your answer very clear and so I checkmarked it quite soon. But I will check back later to see if other people agree or disagree.
$endgroup$
– Bandaro
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
I read the premise as being that the character (or whatever they're trying to perceive) is in darkness, which they can treat as dim light because of darkvision, but also in a lightly-obscured fog. The question is perhaps really about how to adjudicate the combination of different factors which all contribute to obscuring vision - does lightly-obscured + lightly-obscured = heavily-obscured?
$endgroup$
– Carcer
yesterday
$begingroup$
I read the premise as being that the character (or whatever they're trying to perceive) is in darkness, which they can treat as dim light because of darkvision, but also in a lightly-obscured fog. The question is perhaps really about how to adjudicate the combination of different factors which all contribute to obscuring vision - does lightly-obscured + lightly-obscured = heavily-obscured?
$endgroup$
– Carcer
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Bandaro thanks for the checkmark, but do note that you can always switch it to another answer later if another more helpful one comes in, and sometimes it is even good to wait a bit before giving it out. Of course, the choice is completely yours.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Bandaro thanks for the checkmark, but do note that you can always switch it to another answer later if another more helpful one comes in, and sometimes it is even good to wait a bit before giving it out. Of course, the choice is completely yours.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose I found your answer very clear and so I checkmarked it quite soon. But I will check back later to see if other people agree or disagree.
$endgroup$
– Bandaro
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose I found your answer very clear and so I checkmarked it quite soon. But I will check back later to see if other people agree or disagree.
$endgroup$
– Bandaro
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
yesterday
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
RAW different sources of obscurement don't stack
Nothing in the rules says that having multiple things that cause an area to be considered lightly obscured make it considered to be heavily obscured.
In a lightly obscured area, such as dim light, patchy fog, or moderate foliage, creatures have disadvantage on Wisdom (Perception) checks that rely on sight.
So, for example if you were to have foliage in a place and also dim light that would not make that space heavily obscured according to the rules, because heavily obscured has a specific definition of its own.
A heavily obscured area--such as darkness, opaque fog, or dense foliage--blocks vision entirely.
In your specific example, the character with darkvision will see in an area of low light as if it were lightly obscured.
There are simply no mechanics in the rules that say how that this would happen and, if so, how it would work.
Having the fog which also causes it to be lightly obscured does not cause it to be considered to be heavily obscured for that character. For that to happen you would have to have something that would cause the character to not be able to see that area at all.
DM rulings apply here naturally
Now, the rules don't specifically say that stacking different sources of obscurement is not allowed and thus it is well within the power of a DM to say that having enough sources of obscurement might indeed add up to an effect that counts as heavily obscured. In fact, the determination of obscurement is largely placed in their hands anyways since it is only very loosely defined in the rules.
Thus, this could be a reasonable ruling, but it will vary from table to table what the DM wants to counts as "obscured enough" to bump an effect up to heavily obscured.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Bandaro is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143800%2fif-a-character-has-darkvision-can-they-see-through-an-area-of-nonmagical-darkne%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
RAW different sources of obscurement don't stack
Nothing in the rules says that having multiple things that cause an area to be considered lightly obscured make it considered to be heavily obscured.
In a lightly obscured area, such as dim light, patchy fog, or moderate foliage, creatures have disadvantage on Wisdom (Perception) checks that rely on sight.
So, for example if you were to have foliage in a place and also dim light that would not make that space heavily obscured according to the rules, because heavily obscured has a specific definition of its own.
A heavily obscured area--such as darkness, opaque fog, or dense foliage--blocks vision entirely.
In your specific example, the character with darkvision will see in an area of low light as if it were lightly obscured.
There are simply no mechanics in the rules that say how that this would happen and, if so, how it would work.
Having the fog which also causes it to be lightly obscured does not cause it to be considered to be heavily obscured for that character. For that to happen you would have to have something that would cause the character to not be able to see that area at all.
DM rulings apply here naturally
Now, the rules don't specifically say that stacking different sources of obscurement is not allowed and thus it is well within the power of a DM to say that having enough sources of obscurement might indeed add up to an effect that counts as heavily obscured. In fact, the determination of obscurement is largely placed in their hands anyways since it is only very loosely defined in the rules.
Thus, this could be a reasonable ruling, but it will vary from table to table what the DM wants to counts as "obscured enough" to bump an effect up to heavily obscured.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
RAW different sources of obscurement don't stack
Nothing in the rules says that having multiple things that cause an area to be considered lightly obscured make it considered to be heavily obscured.
In a lightly obscured area, such as dim light, patchy fog, or moderate foliage, creatures have disadvantage on Wisdom (Perception) checks that rely on sight.
So, for example if you were to have foliage in a place and also dim light that would not make that space heavily obscured according to the rules, because heavily obscured has a specific definition of its own.
A heavily obscured area--such as darkness, opaque fog, or dense foliage--blocks vision entirely.
In your specific example, the character with darkvision will see in an area of low light as if it were lightly obscured.
There are simply no mechanics in the rules that say how that this would happen and, if so, how it would work.
Having the fog which also causes it to be lightly obscured does not cause it to be considered to be heavily obscured for that character. For that to happen you would have to have something that would cause the character to not be able to see that area at all.
DM rulings apply here naturally
Now, the rules don't specifically say that stacking different sources of obscurement is not allowed and thus it is well within the power of a DM to say that having enough sources of obscurement might indeed add up to an effect that counts as heavily obscured. In fact, the determination of obscurement is largely placed in their hands anyways since it is only very loosely defined in the rules.
Thus, this could be a reasonable ruling, but it will vary from table to table what the DM wants to counts as "obscured enough" to bump an effect up to heavily obscured.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
RAW different sources of obscurement don't stack
Nothing in the rules says that having multiple things that cause an area to be considered lightly obscured make it considered to be heavily obscured.
In a lightly obscured area, such as dim light, patchy fog, or moderate foliage, creatures have disadvantage on Wisdom (Perception) checks that rely on sight.
So, for example if you were to have foliage in a place and also dim light that would not make that space heavily obscured according to the rules, because heavily obscured has a specific definition of its own.
A heavily obscured area--such as darkness, opaque fog, or dense foliage--blocks vision entirely.
In your specific example, the character with darkvision will see in an area of low light as if it were lightly obscured.
There are simply no mechanics in the rules that say how that this would happen and, if so, how it would work.
Having the fog which also causes it to be lightly obscured does not cause it to be considered to be heavily obscured for that character. For that to happen you would have to have something that would cause the character to not be able to see that area at all.
DM rulings apply here naturally
Now, the rules don't specifically say that stacking different sources of obscurement is not allowed and thus it is well within the power of a DM to say that having enough sources of obscurement might indeed add up to an effect that counts as heavily obscured. In fact, the determination of obscurement is largely placed in their hands anyways since it is only very loosely defined in the rules.
Thus, this could be a reasonable ruling, but it will vary from table to table what the DM wants to counts as "obscured enough" to bump an effect up to heavily obscured.
$endgroup$
RAW different sources of obscurement don't stack
Nothing in the rules says that having multiple things that cause an area to be considered lightly obscured make it considered to be heavily obscured.
In a lightly obscured area, such as dim light, patchy fog, or moderate foliage, creatures have disadvantage on Wisdom (Perception) checks that rely on sight.
So, for example if you were to have foliage in a place and also dim light that would not make that space heavily obscured according to the rules, because heavily obscured has a specific definition of its own.
A heavily obscured area--such as darkness, opaque fog, or dense foliage--blocks vision entirely.
In your specific example, the character with darkvision will see in an area of low light as if it were lightly obscured.
There are simply no mechanics in the rules that say how that this would happen and, if so, how it would work.
Having the fog which also causes it to be lightly obscured does not cause it to be considered to be heavily obscured for that character. For that to happen you would have to have something that would cause the character to not be able to see that area at all.
DM rulings apply here naturally
Now, the rules don't specifically say that stacking different sources of obscurement is not allowed and thus it is well within the power of a DM to say that having enough sources of obscurement might indeed add up to an effect that counts as heavily obscured. In fact, the determination of obscurement is largely placed in their hands anyways since it is only very loosely defined in the rules.
Thus, this could be a reasonable ruling, but it will vary from table to table what the DM wants to counts as "obscured enough" to bump an effect up to heavily obscured.
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
RubiksmooseRubiksmoose
59.3k10287439
59.3k10287439
add a comment |
add a comment |
Bandaro is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Bandaro is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Bandaro is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Bandaro is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143800%2fif-a-character-has-darkvision-can-they-see-through-an-area-of-nonmagical-darkne%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
I read the premise as being that the character (or whatever they're trying to perceive) is in darkness, which they can treat as dim light because of darkvision, but also in a lightly-obscured fog. The question is perhaps really about how to adjudicate the combination of different factors which all contribute to obscuring vision - does lightly-obscured + lightly-obscured = heavily-obscured?
$endgroup$
– Carcer
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Bandaro thanks for the checkmark, but do note that you can always switch it to another answer later if another more helpful one comes in, and sometimes it is even good to wait a bit before giving it out. Of course, the choice is completely yours.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose I found your answer very clear and so I checkmarked it quite soon. But I will check back later to see if other people agree or disagree.
$endgroup$
– Bandaro
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
yesterday