How can Trident be so inexpensive? Will it orbit Triton or just do a (slow) flyby?Is post-X-prize Beresheet better than the X-prize candidate?What should a Discovery Program mission budget look like?Why does NASA's Juno spacecraft only have a one year primary mission?“Culberson's” Europa mission: How can mission proritization be done so unilaterally?Will they really be able to “see” OSIRIS-REx from Australia? With meteor cameras?What are the louver-like structures on the sides of the Mariner 4 probe?How will the Lunar Gateway go to L2 and L1?How will the Ionospheric Connection Explorer (ICON)'s Michelson interferometer measure wind speed?Did NASA's Borg Collective-designed antennas work? Have similar designs ever been used in spacecraft beyond testing?How will the Gateway-before-boots sequence benefit US business, economic and technological development?How will NASA know for sure if its “Good night, Kepler” instruction was correctly and completely executed?

Is there a conventional notation or name for the slip angle?

Melting point of aspirin, contradicting sources

Greatest common substring

Drawing ramified coverings with tikz

How should I respond when I lied about my education and the company finds out through background check?

Open a doc from terminal, but not by its name

A social experiment. What is the worst that can happen?

How can "mimic phobia" be cured or prevented?

Has Darkwing Duck ever met Scrooge McDuck?

Can I Retrieve Email Addresses from BCC?

Freedom of speech and where it applies

What does this horizontal bar at the first measure mean?

Does the Mind Blank spell prevent the target from being frightened?

How to align and center standalone amsmath equations?

Have I saved too much for retirement so far?

When quoting, must I also copy hyphens used to divide words that continue on the next line?

Engineer refusing to file/disclose patents

THT: What is a squared annular “ring”?

Why in book's example is used 言葉(ことば) instead of 言語(げんご)?

What linear sensor for a keyboard?

Diode in opposite direction?

Could solar power be utilized and substitute coal in the 19th century?

How do you respond to a colleague from another team when they're wrongly expecting that you'll help them?

Java - What do constructor type arguments mean when placed *before* the type?



How can Trident be so inexpensive? Will it orbit Triton or just do a (slow) flyby?


Is post-X-prize Beresheet better than the X-prize candidate?What should a Discovery Program mission budget look like?Why does NASA's Juno spacecraft only have a one year primary mission?“Culberson's” Europa mission: How can mission proritization be done so unilaterally?Will they really be able to “see” OSIRIS-REx from Australia? With meteor cameras?What are the louver-like structures on the sides of the Mariner 4 probe?How will the Lunar Gateway go to L2 and L1?How will the Ionospheric Connection Explorer (ICON)'s Michelson interferometer measure wind speed?Did NASA's Borg Collective-designed antennas work? Have similar designs ever been used in spacecraft beyond testing?How will the Gateway-before-boots sequence benefit US business, economic and technological development?How will NASA know for sure if its “Good night, Kepler” instruction was correctly and completely executed?













14












$begingroup$


The recent NY Times article Neptune’s Moon Triton Is Destination of Proposed NASA Mission says (in part):




HOUSTON — Is it time to go back to Neptune?



Scientists representing NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory proposed a spacecraft and mission on Tuesday at the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in Texas that would explore Triton, Neptune’s largest moon.



Unlike multibillion dollar proposals for spacecraft that the agency has usually sent to the outer solar system, this spacecraft, named Trident, aims to be far less expensive, the mission’s scientists and engineers said, or the price of a small mission to the moon.




I don't know exactly how much "a small mission to the moon." but Beresheet is based on a mission that was about US $30 million if I remember correctly, so it could be really amazing if that amount of money can get a spacecraft to the Neptune system and into orbit around Triton.



it's US $95 million, US $30 million was roughly the google X-prize size.



I'm not sure it will orbit or if it will be a flyby, but the article says it will image the complete surface and Triton's period is almost six days:




To get to Triton, the spacecraft would fly in a fast, straight trajectory after an orbital assist from Jupiter, similar to the flyby that was used by the New Horizons spacecraft to visit Pluto in 2015. It would rely on a payload of scientific instruments to conduct ocean detection and atmospheric and ionospheric science. The spacecraft would photograph the entirety of Triton, which is the largest object in the solar system that has not yet been fully imaged.











share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Has anyone got a conversion chart from Nasa dollars to US dollars? Based on the James Webb Space Telescope it's currently about 6 to 1!
    $endgroup$
    – Dave Gremlin
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I've just asked Is post-X-prize Beresheet better than the X-prize candidate?
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    7 hours ago















14












$begingroup$


The recent NY Times article Neptune’s Moon Triton Is Destination of Proposed NASA Mission says (in part):




HOUSTON — Is it time to go back to Neptune?



Scientists representing NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory proposed a spacecraft and mission on Tuesday at the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in Texas that would explore Triton, Neptune’s largest moon.



Unlike multibillion dollar proposals for spacecraft that the agency has usually sent to the outer solar system, this spacecraft, named Trident, aims to be far less expensive, the mission’s scientists and engineers said, or the price of a small mission to the moon.




I don't know exactly how much "a small mission to the moon." but Beresheet is based on a mission that was about US $30 million if I remember correctly, so it could be really amazing if that amount of money can get a spacecraft to the Neptune system and into orbit around Triton.



it's US $95 million, US $30 million was roughly the google X-prize size.



I'm not sure it will orbit or if it will be a flyby, but the article says it will image the complete surface and Triton's period is almost six days:




To get to Triton, the spacecraft would fly in a fast, straight trajectory after an orbital assist from Jupiter, similar to the flyby that was used by the New Horizons spacecraft to visit Pluto in 2015. It would rely on a payload of scientific instruments to conduct ocean detection and atmospheric and ionospheric science. The spacecraft would photograph the entirety of Triton, which is the largest object in the solar system that has not yet been fully imaged.











share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Has anyone got a conversion chart from Nasa dollars to US dollars? Based on the James Webb Space Telescope it's currently about 6 to 1!
    $endgroup$
    – Dave Gremlin
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I've just asked Is post-X-prize Beresheet better than the X-prize candidate?
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    7 hours ago













14












14








14





$begingroup$


The recent NY Times article Neptune’s Moon Triton Is Destination of Proposed NASA Mission says (in part):




HOUSTON — Is it time to go back to Neptune?



Scientists representing NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory proposed a spacecraft and mission on Tuesday at the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in Texas that would explore Triton, Neptune’s largest moon.



Unlike multibillion dollar proposals for spacecraft that the agency has usually sent to the outer solar system, this spacecraft, named Trident, aims to be far less expensive, the mission’s scientists and engineers said, or the price of a small mission to the moon.




I don't know exactly how much "a small mission to the moon." but Beresheet is based on a mission that was about US $30 million if I remember correctly, so it could be really amazing if that amount of money can get a spacecraft to the Neptune system and into orbit around Triton.



it's US $95 million, US $30 million was roughly the google X-prize size.



I'm not sure it will orbit or if it will be a flyby, but the article says it will image the complete surface and Triton's period is almost six days:




To get to Triton, the spacecraft would fly in a fast, straight trajectory after an orbital assist from Jupiter, similar to the flyby that was used by the New Horizons spacecraft to visit Pluto in 2015. It would rely on a payload of scientific instruments to conduct ocean detection and atmospheric and ionospheric science. The spacecraft would photograph the entirety of Triton, which is the largest object in the solar system that has not yet been fully imaged.











share|improve this question











$endgroup$




The recent NY Times article Neptune’s Moon Triton Is Destination of Proposed NASA Mission says (in part):




HOUSTON — Is it time to go back to Neptune?



Scientists representing NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory proposed a spacecraft and mission on Tuesday at the Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in Texas that would explore Triton, Neptune’s largest moon.



Unlike multibillion dollar proposals for spacecraft that the agency has usually sent to the outer solar system, this spacecraft, named Trident, aims to be far less expensive, the mission’s scientists and engineers said, or the price of a small mission to the moon.




I don't know exactly how much "a small mission to the moon." but Beresheet is based on a mission that was about US $30 million if I remember correctly, so it could be really amazing if that amount of money can get a spacecraft to the Neptune system and into orbit around Triton.



it's US $95 million, US $30 million was roughly the google X-prize size.



I'm not sure it will orbit or if it will be a flyby, but the article says it will image the complete surface and Triton's period is almost six days:




To get to Triton, the spacecraft would fly in a fast, straight trajectory after an orbital assist from Jupiter, similar to the flyby that was used by the New Horizons spacecraft to visit Pluto in 2015. It would rely on a payload of scientific instruments to conduct ocean detection and atmospheric and ionospheric science. The spacecraft would photograph the entirety of Triton, which is the largest object in the solar system that has not yet been fully imaged.








nasa deep-space neptune






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago







uhoh

















asked yesterday









uhohuhoh

39.3k18144500




39.3k18144500







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Has anyone got a conversion chart from Nasa dollars to US dollars? Based on the James Webb Space Telescope it's currently about 6 to 1!
    $endgroup$
    – Dave Gremlin
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I've just asked Is post-X-prize Beresheet better than the X-prize candidate?
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    7 hours ago












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Has anyone got a conversion chart from Nasa dollars to US dollars? Based on the James Webb Space Telescope it's currently about 6 to 1!
    $endgroup$
    – Dave Gremlin
    19 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I've just asked Is post-X-prize Beresheet better than the X-prize candidate?
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    7 hours ago







3




3




$begingroup$
Has anyone got a conversion chart from Nasa dollars to US dollars? Based on the James Webb Space Telescope it's currently about 6 to 1!
$endgroup$
– Dave Gremlin
19 hours ago




$begingroup$
Has anyone got a conversion chart from Nasa dollars to US dollars? Based on the James Webb Space Telescope it's currently about 6 to 1!
$endgroup$
– Dave Gremlin
19 hours ago












$begingroup$
I've just asked Is post-X-prize Beresheet better than the X-prize candidate?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
I've just asked Is post-X-prize Beresheet better than the X-prize candidate?
$endgroup$
– uhoh
7 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















36












$begingroup$

I wrote the article you are referencing. @Hobbes has it exactly correct. It is a lightweight vehicle that can launch on even a small rocket, and takes advantage of gravity assists and favorable celestial mechanics to catch Triton at just the right time for encounter with the plumes illuminated. It will image the entirety of Triton in sunlight on approach, and spin around and image it in Neptunelight on the outbound. It basically carries no fuel but for the most modest trajectory corrections, and the hardware is all based on flight tested technologies. It will use radioactive power sources rather than heavy and expensive solar panels (for obvious reasons) and the science instrument payload will allow a fairly robust set of science objectives to be achieved, including ocean detection and characterizing its ionosphere.



Regarding how it affects the Decadal flagship recommendations, the problem facing an ice giants flagship is that you are looking at a minimum two-billion-dollar spacecraft with a 2040 launch at best (flagships take forever for political reasons, and a minimum of 25 years will have elapsed between the launches of Cassini and Clipper), and it would have to launch on something like SLS to get there in a reasonable timeframe (if SLS is still around) at a billion dollars per launch. By then, Trident would have already completed its flyby, and the flagship would have another eight or so years of cruise ahead of it. That's a long time to plan good Triton science based on the Trident science return.



Moreover, I would suggest that if we learned anything from the outcome of the 2013 Decadal, it is that mission sequences might be the way of the future. (See the MSR sequence, and now the Europa Clipper/lander sequence.)



Ultimately, Trident has a long way to go before being selected, and the competition is going to be fierce. (Moon Diver is a particularly thrilling competitor.) But the prospect of expanding the Discovery program from 5AU to 30AU is a real paradigm shift, and would be transformative for outer planets exploration. I hope this helps!






share|improve this answer










New contributor




David W. Brown is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It's described as a fly by in the text just beneath the headline.
    $endgroup$
    – HopDavid
    yesterday






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    I wrote the article you are referencing Well, uh, cool! Nice to see people reaching out.
    $endgroup$
    – Fake Name
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for your answer and Welcome to Space! About "It will image the entirety entirety of Triton in sunlight on approach..." Do you mean it will start imaging about three days prior to flyby so that all sides of the planet are illuminated by sunlight, or that one entire half will be imaged illuminated by sunlight and the other half will be imaged by "Neptunelight"? Like they say, "Photography Dies in Darkness" (humor)
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    btw I enjoyed your 2015 Op-Ed When Congress Puts NASA on Hold, Planets Don’t Wait
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hi Uhoh! Thanks. Yes it is exactly as you describe. It’ll image one complete revolution of Triton around Neptune on approach (from -105 to -35 hours) before beginning a high resolution imaging at -10 hours on close approach. On departure it will do eclipse imaging in Neptuneshine. Incidentally, I noticed the subject line describes it as a slow flyby, but in fact it will be the fastest flyby of a planetary object ever achieved. (Faster for example than New Horizons at Pluto.) I can dig through my notes for the exact number, though I don’t have them with me presently.
    $endgroup$
    – David W. Brown
    yesterday


















11












$begingroup$

It's a fast flyby in the $500M cost class (a Discovery mission). So not really comparable to Beresheet.




A rare, low Δv trajectory (Fig. 1) enables an MMRTG-powered spacecraft fitting under the Discovery cost cap.




The mission would have to be launched in 2026, for a Neptune encounter in 2038.




New Horizons has effectively demonstrated the scientific value of fast flybys in the outer solar system. Trident’s encounter with Triton will be similarly rapid...




so like New Horizons, they'll have only a few days of close-in data collection. The plan is to do the flyby at an altitude low enough to sample Triton's atmosphere.



During the Jupiter gravity assist, an Io flyby is possible.



More info



There have been more proposals for Uranus and Neptune missions recently, including orbiters and atmospheric entry probes. Interest in the ice giants is increasing, in the current decadal survey they were ranked third after Mars sample return and the Europa mission. Once those are out of the way, it may be possible to get a flagship-class mission funded (which would enable an orbiter at least).
While this flyby is an interesting idea, I suspect it may spoil that process a bit.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "508"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f35009%2fhow-can-trident-be-so-inexpensive-will-it-orbit-triton-or-just-do-a-slow-flyb%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    36












    $begingroup$

    I wrote the article you are referencing. @Hobbes has it exactly correct. It is a lightweight vehicle that can launch on even a small rocket, and takes advantage of gravity assists and favorable celestial mechanics to catch Triton at just the right time for encounter with the plumes illuminated. It will image the entirety of Triton in sunlight on approach, and spin around and image it in Neptunelight on the outbound. It basically carries no fuel but for the most modest trajectory corrections, and the hardware is all based on flight tested technologies. It will use radioactive power sources rather than heavy and expensive solar panels (for obvious reasons) and the science instrument payload will allow a fairly robust set of science objectives to be achieved, including ocean detection and characterizing its ionosphere.



    Regarding how it affects the Decadal flagship recommendations, the problem facing an ice giants flagship is that you are looking at a minimum two-billion-dollar spacecraft with a 2040 launch at best (flagships take forever for political reasons, and a minimum of 25 years will have elapsed between the launches of Cassini and Clipper), and it would have to launch on something like SLS to get there in a reasonable timeframe (if SLS is still around) at a billion dollars per launch. By then, Trident would have already completed its flyby, and the flagship would have another eight or so years of cruise ahead of it. That's a long time to plan good Triton science based on the Trident science return.



    Moreover, I would suggest that if we learned anything from the outcome of the 2013 Decadal, it is that mission sequences might be the way of the future. (See the MSR sequence, and now the Europa Clipper/lander sequence.)



    Ultimately, Trident has a long way to go before being selected, and the competition is going to be fierce. (Moon Diver is a particularly thrilling competitor.) But the prospect of expanding the Discovery program from 5AU to 30AU is a real paradigm shift, and would be transformative for outer planets exploration. I hope this helps!






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    David W. Brown is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      It's described as a fly by in the text just beneath the headline.
      $endgroup$
      – HopDavid
      yesterday






    • 7




      $begingroup$
      I wrote the article you are referencing Well, uh, cool! Nice to see people reaching out.
      $endgroup$
      – Fake Name
      yesterday






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Thanks for your answer and Welcome to Space! About "It will image the entirety entirety of Triton in sunlight on approach..." Do you mean it will start imaging about three days prior to flyby so that all sides of the planet are illuminated by sunlight, or that one entire half will be imaged illuminated by sunlight and the other half will be imaged by "Neptunelight"? Like they say, "Photography Dies in Darkness" (humor)
      $endgroup$
      – uhoh
      yesterday






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      btw I enjoyed your 2015 Op-Ed When Congress Puts NASA on Hold, Planets Don’t Wait
      $endgroup$
      – uhoh
      yesterday






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Hi Uhoh! Thanks. Yes it is exactly as you describe. It’ll image one complete revolution of Triton around Neptune on approach (from -105 to -35 hours) before beginning a high resolution imaging at -10 hours on close approach. On departure it will do eclipse imaging in Neptuneshine. Incidentally, I noticed the subject line describes it as a slow flyby, but in fact it will be the fastest flyby of a planetary object ever achieved. (Faster for example than New Horizons at Pluto.) I can dig through my notes for the exact number, though I don’t have them with me presently.
      $endgroup$
      – David W. Brown
      yesterday















    36












    $begingroup$

    I wrote the article you are referencing. @Hobbes has it exactly correct. It is a lightweight vehicle that can launch on even a small rocket, and takes advantage of gravity assists and favorable celestial mechanics to catch Triton at just the right time for encounter with the plumes illuminated. It will image the entirety of Triton in sunlight on approach, and spin around and image it in Neptunelight on the outbound. It basically carries no fuel but for the most modest trajectory corrections, and the hardware is all based on flight tested technologies. It will use radioactive power sources rather than heavy and expensive solar panels (for obvious reasons) and the science instrument payload will allow a fairly robust set of science objectives to be achieved, including ocean detection and characterizing its ionosphere.



    Regarding how it affects the Decadal flagship recommendations, the problem facing an ice giants flagship is that you are looking at a minimum two-billion-dollar spacecraft with a 2040 launch at best (flagships take forever for political reasons, and a minimum of 25 years will have elapsed between the launches of Cassini and Clipper), and it would have to launch on something like SLS to get there in a reasonable timeframe (if SLS is still around) at a billion dollars per launch. By then, Trident would have already completed its flyby, and the flagship would have another eight or so years of cruise ahead of it. That's a long time to plan good Triton science based on the Trident science return.



    Moreover, I would suggest that if we learned anything from the outcome of the 2013 Decadal, it is that mission sequences might be the way of the future. (See the MSR sequence, and now the Europa Clipper/lander sequence.)



    Ultimately, Trident has a long way to go before being selected, and the competition is going to be fierce. (Moon Diver is a particularly thrilling competitor.) But the prospect of expanding the Discovery program from 5AU to 30AU is a real paradigm shift, and would be transformative for outer planets exploration. I hope this helps!






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    David W. Brown is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      It's described as a fly by in the text just beneath the headline.
      $endgroup$
      – HopDavid
      yesterday






    • 7




      $begingroup$
      I wrote the article you are referencing Well, uh, cool! Nice to see people reaching out.
      $endgroup$
      – Fake Name
      yesterday






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Thanks for your answer and Welcome to Space! About "It will image the entirety entirety of Triton in sunlight on approach..." Do you mean it will start imaging about three days prior to flyby so that all sides of the planet are illuminated by sunlight, or that one entire half will be imaged illuminated by sunlight and the other half will be imaged by "Neptunelight"? Like they say, "Photography Dies in Darkness" (humor)
      $endgroup$
      – uhoh
      yesterday






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      btw I enjoyed your 2015 Op-Ed When Congress Puts NASA on Hold, Planets Don’t Wait
      $endgroup$
      – uhoh
      yesterday






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Hi Uhoh! Thanks. Yes it is exactly as you describe. It’ll image one complete revolution of Triton around Neptune on approach (from -105 to -35 hours) before beginning a high resolution imaging at -10 hours on close approach. On departure it will do eclipse imaging in Neptuneshine. Incidentally, I noticed the subject line describes it as a slow flyby, but in fact it will be the fastest flyby of a planetary object ever achieved. (Faster for example than New Horizons at Pluto.) I can dig through my notes for the exact number, though I don’t have them with me presently.
      $endgroup$
      – David W. Brown
      yesterday













    36












    36








    36





    $begingroup$

    I wrote the article you are referencing. @Hobbes has it exactly correct. It is a lightweight vehicle that can launch on even a small rocket, and takes advantage of gravity assists and favorable celestial mechanics to catch Triton at just the right time for encounter with the plumes illuminated. It will image the entirety of Triton in sunlight on approach, and spin around and image it in Neptunelight on the outbound. It basically carries no fuel but for the most modest trajectory corrections, and the hardware is all based on flight tested technologies. It will use radioactive power sources rather than heavy and expensive solar panels (for obvious reasons) and the science instrument payload will allow a fairly robust set of science objectives to be achieved, including ocean detection and characterizing its ionosphere.



    Regarding how it affects the Decadal flagship recommendations, the problem facing an ice giants flagship is that you are looking at a minimum two-billion-dollar spacecraft with a 2040 launch at best (flagships take forever for political reasons, and a minimum of 25 years will have elapsed between the launches of Cassini and Clipper), and it would have to launch on something like SLS to get there in a reasonable timeframe (if SLS is still around) at a billion dollars per launch. By then, Trident would have already completed its flyby, and the flagship would have another eight or so years of cruise ahead of it. That's a long time to plan good Triton science based on the Trident science return.



    Moreover, I would suggest that if we learned anything from the outcome of the 2013 Decadal, it is that mission sequences might be the way of the future. (See the MSR sequence, and now the Europa Clipper/lander sequence.)



    Ultimately, Trident has a long way to go before being selected, and the competition is going to be fierce. (Moon Diver is a particularly thrilling competitor.) But the prospect of expanding the Discovery program from 5AU to 30AU is a real paradigm shift, and would be transformative for outer planets exploration. I hope this helps!






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    David W. Brown is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$



    I wrote the article you are referencing. @Hobbes has it exactly correct. It is a lightweight vehicle that can launch on even a small rocket, and takes advantage of gravity assists and favorable celestial mechanics to catch Triton at just the right time for encounter with the plumes illuminated. It will image the entirety of Triton in sunlight on approach, and spin around and image it in Neptunelight on the outbound. It basically carries no fuel but for the most modest trajectory corrections, and the hardware is all based on flight tested technologies. It will use radioactive power sources rather than heavy and expensive solar panels (for obvious reasons) and the science instrument payload will allow a fairly robust set of science objectives to be achieved, including ocean detection and characterizing its ionosphere.



    Regarding how it affects the Decadal flagship recommendations, the problem facing an ice giants flagship is that you are looking at a minimum two-billion-dollar spacecraft with a 2040 launch at best (flagships take forever for political reasons, and a minimum of 25 years will have elapsed between the launches of Cassini and Clipper), and it would have to launch on something like SLS to get there in a reasonable timeframe (if SLS is still around) at a billion dollars per launch. By then, Trident would have already completed its flyby, and the flagship would have another eight or so years of cruise ahead of it. That's a long time to plan good Triton science based on the Trident science return.



    Moreover, I would suggest that if we learned anything from the outcome of the 2013 Decadal, it is that mission sequences might be the way of the future. (See the MSR sequence, and now the Europa Clipper/lander sequence.)



    Ultimately, Trident has a long way to go before being selected, and the competition is going to be fierce. (Moon Diver is a particularly thrilling competitor.) But the prospect of expanding the Discovery program from 5AU to 30AU is a real paradigm shift, and would be transformative for outer planets exploration. I hope this helps!







    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    David W. Brown is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 2 hours ago









    Robotnik

    1034




    1034






    New contributor




    David W. Brown is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    answered yesterday









    David W. BrownDavid W. Brown

    46114




    46114




    New contributor




    David W. Brown is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    New contributor





    David W. Brown is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    David W. Brown is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.











    • $begingroup$
      It's described as a fly by in the text just beneath the headline.
      $endgroup$
      – HopDavid
      yesterday






    • 7




      $begingroup$
      I wrote the article you are referencing Well, uh, cool! Nice to see people reaching out.
      $endgroup$
      – Fake Name
      yesterday






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Thanks for your answer and Welcome to Space! About "It will image the entirety entirety of Triton in sunlight on approach..." Do you mean it will start imaging about three days prior to flyby so that all sides of the planet are illuminated by sunlight, or that one entire half will be imaged illuminated by sunlight and the other half will be imaged by "Neptunelight"? Like they say, "Photography Dies in Darkness" (humor)
      $endgroup$
      – uhoh
      yesterday






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      btw I enjoyed your 2015 Op-Ed When Congress Puts NASA on Hold, Planets Don’t Wait
      $endgroup$
      – uhoh
      yesterday






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Hi Uhoh! Thanks. Yes it is exactly as you describe. It’ll image one complete revolution of Triton around Neptune on approach (from -105 to -35 hours) before beginning a high resolution imaging at -10 hours on close approach. On departure it will do eclipse imaging in Neptuneshine. Incidentally, I noticed the subject line describes it as a slow flyby, but in fact it will be the fastest flyby of a planetary object ever achieved. (Faster for example than New Horizons at Pluto.) I can dig through my notes for the exact number, though I don’t have them with me presently.
      $endgroup$
      – David W. Brown
      yesterday
















    • $begingroup$
      It's described as a fly by in the text just beneath the headline.
      $endgroup$
      – HopDavid
      yesterday






    • 7




      $begingroup$
      I wrote the article you are referencing Well, uh, cool! Nice to see people reaching out.
      $endgroup$
      – Fake Name
      yesterday






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Thanks for your answer and Welcome to Space! About "It will image the entirety entirety of Triton in sunlight on approach..." Do you mean it will start imaging about three days prior to flyby so that all sides of the planet are illuminated by sunlight, or that one entire half will be imaged illuminated by sunlight and the other half will be imaged by "Neptunelight"? Like they say, "Photography Dies in Darkness" (humor)
      $endgroup$
      – uhoh
      yesterday






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      btw I enjoyed your 2015 Op-Ed When Congress Puts NASA on Hold, Planets Don’t Wait
      $endgroup$
      – uhoh
      yesterday






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Hi Uhoh! Thanks. Yes it is exactly as you describe. It’ll image one complete revolution of Triton around Neptune on approach (from -105 to -35 hours) before beginning a high resolution imaging at -10 hours on close approach. On departure it will do eclipse imaging in Neptuneshine. Incidentally, I noticed the subject line describes it as a slow flyby, but in fact it will be the fastest flyby of a planetary object ever achieved. (Faster for example than New Horizons at Pluto.) I can dig through my notes for the exact number, though I don’t have them with me presently.
      $endgroup$
      – David W. Brown
      yesterday















    $begingroup$
    It's described as a fly by in the text just beneath the headline.
    $endgroup$
    – HopDavid
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    It's described as a fly by in the text just beneath the headline.
    $endgroup$
    – HopDavid
    yesterday




    7




    7




    $begingroup$
    I wrote the article you are referencing Well, uh, cool! Nice to see people reaching out.
    $endgroup$
    – Fake Name
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    I wrote the article you are referencing Well, uh, cool! Nice to see people reaching out.
    $endgroup$
    – Fake Name
    yesterday




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for your answer and Welcome to Space! About "It will image the entirety entirety of Triton in sunlight on approach..." Do you mean it will start imaging about three days prior to flyby so that all sides of the planet are illuminated by sunlight, or that one entire half will be imaged illuminated by sunlight and the other half will be imaged by "Neptunelight"? Like they say, "Photography Dies in Darkness" (humor)
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    Thanks for your answer and Welcome to Space! About "It will image the entirety entirety of Triton in sunlight on approach..." Do you mean it will start imaging about three days prior to flyby so that all sides of the planet are illuminated by sunlight, or that one entire half will be imaged illuminated by sunlight and the other half will be imaged by "Neptunelight"? Like they say, "Photography Dies in Darkness" (humor)
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    yesterday




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    btw I enjoyed your 2015 Op-Ed When Congress Puts NASA on Hold, Planets Don’t Wait
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    btw I enjoyed your 2015 Op-Ed When Congress Puts NASA on Hold, Planets Don’t Wait
    $endgroup$
    – uhoh
    yesterday




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Hi Uhoh! Thanks. Yes it is exactly as you describe. It’ll image one complete revolution of Triton around Neptune on approach (from -105 to -35 hours) before beginning a high resolution imaging at -10 hours on close approach. On departure it will do eclipse imaging in Neptuneshine. Incidentally, I noticed the subject line describes it as a slow flyby, but in fact it will be the fastest flyby of a planetary object ever achieved. (Faster for example than New Horizons at Pluto.) I can dig through my notes for the exact number, though I don’t have them with me presently.
    $endgroup$
    – David W. Brown
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    Hi Uhoh! Thanks. Yes it is exactly as you describe. It’ll image one complete revolution of Triton around Neptune on approach (from -105 to -35 hours) before beginning a high resolution imaging at -10 hours on close approach. On departure it will do eclipse imaging in Neptuneshine. Incidentally, I noticed the subject line describes it as a slow flyby, but in fact it will be the fastest flyby of a planetary object ever achieved. (Faster for example than New Horizons at Pluto.) I can dig through my notes for the exact number, though I don’t have them with me presently.
    $endgroup$
    – David W. Brown
    yesterday











    11












    $begingroup$

    It's a fast flyby in the $500M cost class (a Discovery mission). So not really comparable to Beresheet.




    A rare, low Δv trajectory (Fig. 1) enables an MMRTG-powered spacecraft fitting under the Discovery cost cap.




    The mission would have to be launched in 2026, for a Neptune encounter in 2038.




    New Horizons has effectively demonstrated the scientific value of fast flybys in the outer solar system. Trident’s encounter with Triton will be similarly rapid...




    so like New Horizons, they'll have only a few days of close-in data collection. The plan is to do the flyby at an altitude low enough to sample Triton's atmosphere.



    During the Jupiter gravity assist, an Io flyby is possible.



    More info



    There have been more proposals for Uranus and Neptune missions recently, including orbiters and atmospheric entry probes. Interest in the ice giants is increasing, in the current decadal survey they were ranked third after Mars sample return and the Europa mission. Once those are out of the way, it may be possible to get a flagship-class mission funded (which would enable an orbiter at least).
    While this flyby is an interesting idea, I suspect it may spoil that process a bit.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      11












      $begingroup$

      It's a fast flyby in the $500M cost class (a Discovery mission). So not really comparable to Beresheet.




      A rare, low Δv trajectory (Fig. 1) enables an MMRTG-powered spacecraft fitting under the Discovery cost cap.




      The mission would have to be launched in 2026, for a Neptune encounter in 2038.




      New Horizons has effectively demonstrated the scientific value of fast flybys in the outer solar system. Trident’s encounter with Triton will be similarly rapid...




      so like New Horizons, they'll have only a few days of close-in data collection. The plan is to do the flyby at an altitude low enough to sample Triton's atmosphere.



      During the Jupiter gravity assist, an Io flyby is possible.



      More info



      There have been more proposals for Uranus and Neptune missions recently, including orbiters and atmospheric entry probes. Interest in the ice giants is increasing, in the current decadal survey they were ranked third after Mars sample return and the Europa mission. Once those are out of the way, it may be possible to get a flagship-class mission funded (which would enable an orbiter at least).
      While this flyby is an interesting idea, I suspect it may spoil that process a bit.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        11












        11








        11





        $begingroup$

        It's a fast flyby in the $500M cost class (a Discovery mission). So not really comparable to Beresheet.




        A rare, low Δv trajectory (Fig. 1) enables an MMRTG-powered spacecraft fitting under the Discovery cost cap.




        The mission would have to be launched in 2026, for a Neptune encounter in 2038.




        New Horizons has effectively demonstrated the scientific value of fast flybys in the outer solar system. Trident’s encounter with Triton will be similarly rapid...




        so like New Horizons, they'll have only a few days of close-in data collection. The plan is to do the flyby at an altitude low enough to sample Triton's atmosphere.



        During the Jupiter gravity assist, an Io flyby is possible.



        More info



        There have been more proposals for Uranus and Neptune missions recently, including orbiters and atmospheric entry probes. Interest in the ice giants is increasing, in the current decadal survey they were ranked third after Mars sample return and the Europa mission. Once those are out of the way, it may be possible to get a flagship-class mission funded (which would enable an orbiter at least).
        While this flyby is an interesting idea, I suspect it may spoil that process a bit.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        It's a fast flyby in the $500M cost class (a Discovery mission). So not really comparable to Beresheet.




        A rare, low Δv trajectory (Fig. 1) enables an MMRTG-powered spacecraft fitting under the Discovery cost cap.




        The mission would have to be launched in 2026, for a Neptune encounter in 2038.




        New Horizons has effectively demonstrated the scientific value of fast flybys in the outer solar system. Trident’s encounter with Triton will be similarly rapid...




        so like New Horizons, they'll have only a few days of close-in data collection. The plan is to do the flyby at an altitude low enough to sample Triton's atmosphere.



        During the Jupiter gravity assist, an Io flyby is possible.



        More info



        There have been more proposals for Uranus and Neptune missions recently, including orbiters and atmospheric entry probes. Interest in the ice giants is increasing, in the current decadal survey they were ranked third after Mars sample return and the Europa mission. Once those are out of the way, it may be possible to get a flagship-class mission funded (which would enable an orbiter at least).
        While this flyby is an interesting idea, I suspect it may spoil that process a bit.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited yesterday

























        answered yesterday









        HobbesHobbes

        94.2k2263419




        94.2k2263419



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f35009%2fhow-can-trident-be-so-inexpensive-will-it-orbit-triton-or-just-do-a-slow-flyb%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Sum ergo cogito? 1 nng

            三茅街道4182Guuntc Dn precexpngmageondP