Greco-Roman egalitarianismA cunning involutionA Simple Puzzle - A bus DriverI don't exist yet. Help me fix that!The magical water drumAn eager refusalThe followed and the followerHow to tell one's right/leftThe round tableReading in the dark, faster than lightGuess a common 5-letter word!
Meta programming: Declare a new struct on the fly
How can I successfully establish a nationwide combat training program for a large country?
How to prevent YouTube from showing already watched videos?
For airliners, what prevents wing strikes on landing in bad weather?
Can a malicious addon access internet history and such in chrome/firefox?
Can a Gentile theist be saved?
Why are all the doors on Ferenginar (the Ferengi home world) far shorter than the average Ferengi?
Installing PowerShell on 32-bit Kali OS fails
Have I saved too much for retirement so far?
Simple recursive Sudoku solver
Books on the History of math research at European universities
Lightning Web Component - do I need to track changes for every single input field in a form
What was required to accept "troll"?
Can a Bard use an arcane focus?
Invariance of results when scaling explanatory variables in logistic regression, is there a proof?
Is there an Impartial Brexit Deal comparison site?
Partial sums of primes
Organic chemistry Iodoform Reaction
Who must act to prevent Brexit on March 29th?
I2C signal and power over long range (10meter cable)
Can somebody explain Brexit in a few child-proof sentences?
Freedom of speech and where it applies
Reply ‘no position’ while the job posting is still there (‘HiWi’ position in Germany)
I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?
Greco-Roman egalitarianism
A cunning involutionA Simple Puzzle - A bus DriverI don't exist yet. Help me fix that!The magical water drumAn eager refusalThe followed and the followerHow to tell one's right/leftThe round tableReading in the dark, faster than lightGuess a common 5-letter word!
$begingroup$
Athenian democracy
is a cornerstone of egalitarianism. One person, one vote. Everyone.
Here's something, though, Athenians mightn't've imagined:
I = II = III
IV = V = VI = VII = VIII
IX = X = XI = XII = XIII
XIV = XV = XVI = XVII = XVIII = IL = L = LI = LII = LIII
XIX = XX = XXI = XXII = XXIII = ... ?
XXIV = XXV = XXVI = XXVII = XXVIII = ... ?
XXIX = XXX = XXXI = XXXII = XXXIII = ... ?
Can you imagine it?
Please fill in the right side ... ?
s and explain.
lateral-thinking
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Athenian democracy
is a cornerstone of egalitarianism. One person, one vote. Everyone.
Here's something, though, Athenians mightn't've imagined:
I = II = III
IV = V = VI = VII = VIII
IX = X = XI = XII = XIII
XIV = XV = XVI = XVII = XVIII = IL = L = LI = LII = LIII
XIX = XX = XXI = XXII = XXIII = ... ?
XXIV = XXV = XXVI = XXVII = XXVIII = ... ?
XXIX = XXX = XXXI = XXXII = XXXIII = ... ?
Can you imagine it?
Please fill in the right side ... ?
s and explain.
lateral-thinking
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Apology for the lack of more specific tags: They would give away the solution.
$endgroup$
– humn
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Athenian democracy
is a cornerstone of egalitarianism. One person, one vote. Everyone.
Here's something, though, Athenians mightn't've imagined:
I = II = III
IV = V = VI = VII = VIII
IX = X = XI = XII = XIII
XIV = XV = XVI = XVII = XVIII = IL = L = LI = LII = LIII
XIX = XX = XXI = XXII = XXIII = ... ?
XXIV = XXV = XXVI = XXVII = XXVIII = ... ?
XXIX = XXX = XXXI = XXXII = XXXIII = ... ?
Can you imagine it?
Please fill in the right side ... ?
s and explain.
lateral-thinking
$endgroup$
Athenian democracy
is a cornerstone of egalitarianism. One person, one vote. Everyone.
Here's something, though, Athenians mightn't've imagined:
I = II = III
IV = V = VI = VII = VIII
IX = X = XI = XII = XIII
XIV = XV = XVI = XVII = XVIII = IL = L = LI = LII = LIII
XIX = XX = XXI = XXII = XXIII = ... ?
XXIV = XXV = XXVI = XXVII = XXVIII = ... ?
XXIX = XXX = XXXI = XXXII = XXXIII = ... ?
Can you imagine it?
Please fill in the right side ... ?
s and explain.
lateral-thinking
lateral-thinking
edited yesterday
humn
asked yesterday
humnhumn
14.7k442132
14.7k442132
$begingroup$
Apology for the lack of more specific tags: They would give away the solution.
$endgroup$
– humn
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Apology for the lack of more specific tags: They would give away the solution.
$endgroup$
– humn
yesterday
$begingroup$
Apology for the lack of more specific tags: They would give away the solution.
$endgroup$
– humn
yesterday
$begingroup$
Apology for the lack of more specific tags: They would give away the solution.
$endgroup$
– humn
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Equal numbers are those with
equal products of Roman numerals
so the blanks are
IC = C = CI = CII = CIII
ID = D = DI = DII = DIII
IM = M = MI = MII = MIII
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
@humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
$endgroup$
– noedne
yesterday
$begingroup$
Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
$endgroup$
– humn
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Very interesting!
$endgroup$
– noedne
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80996%2fgreco-roman-egalitarianism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Equal numbers are those with
equal products of Roman numerals
so the blanks are
IC = C = CI = CII = CIII
ID = D = DI = DII = DIII
IM = M = MI = MII = MIII
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
@humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
$endgroup$
– noedne
yesterday
$begingroup$
Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
$endgroup$
– humn
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Very interesting!
$endgroup$
– noedne
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Equal numbers are those with
equal products of Roman numerals
so the blanks are
IC = C = CI = CII = CIII
ID = D = DI = DII = DIII
IM = M = MI = MII = MIII
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
@humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
$endgroup$
– noedne
yesterday
$begingroup$
Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
$endgroup$
– humn
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Very interesting!
$endgroup$
– noedne
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Equal numbers are those with
equal products of Roman numerals
so the blanks are
IC = C = CI = CII = CIII
ID = D = DI = DII = DIII
IM = M = MI = MII = MIII
$endgroup$
Equal numbers are those with
equal products of Roman numerals
so the blanks are
IC = C = CI = CII = CIII
ID = D = DI = DII = DIII
IM = M = MI = MII = MIII
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
noednenoedne
7,60212160
7,60212160
2
$begingroup$
@humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
$endgroup$
– noedne
yesterday
$begingroup$
Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
$endgroup$
– humn
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Very interesting!
$endgroup$
– noedne
yesterday
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
@humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
$endgroup$
– noedne
yesterday
$begingroup$
Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
$endgroup$
– humn
yesterday
2
$begingroup$
The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Very interesting!
$endgroup$
– noedne
yesterday
2
2
$begingroup$
@humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
$endgroup$
– noedne
yesterday
$begingroup$
@humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
$endgroup$
– noedne
yesterday
$begingroup$
Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
$endgroup$
– humn
yesterday
$begingroup$
Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
$endgroup$
– humn
yesterday
2
2
$begingroup$
The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
yesterday
$begingroup$
The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Very interesting!
$endgroup$
– noedne
yesterday
$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Very interesting!
$endgroup$
– noedne
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80996%2fgreco-roman-egalitarianism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Apology for the lack of more specific tags: They would give away the solution.
$endgroup$
– humn
yesterday