Can we have a perfect cadence in a minor key?Do different modes have the same cadence structure?Name for a group of notes made up of a root, major third, and perfect 4th?Making part of a triad chord sharper, but is it counted as minor?Triads with thirds that aren't major or minor?Name for major/minor ambiguity in cadenceIs this cadence correctly written?Is this an imperfect authentic cadence in a minor key?Is there a specific name for the use of IV chord over the V in the bass, e.g. F/G in the key of CIs the sense of resolution of a harmonic cadence psychologically “intrinsic”, or is it created through conditioning?Understanding the concept of a “Cadence”

Is infinity mathematically observable?

In Star Trek IV, why did the Bounty go back to a time when whales were already rare?

How to prevent YouTube from showing already watched videos?

Can I use my Chinese passport to enter China after I acquired another citizenship?

Can the electrostatic force be infinite in magnitude?

My boss asked me to take a one-day class, then signs it up as a day off

How to deal with or prevent idle in the test team?

How can I raise concerns with a new DM about XP splitting?

How do ultrasonic sensors differentiate between transmitted and received signals?

What is the term when two people sing in harmony, but they aren't singing the same notes?

How did Monica know how to operate Carol's "designer"?

Simple recursive Sudoku solver

Greatest common substring

Resetting two CD4017 counters simultaneously, only one resets

When is separating the total wavefunction into a space part and a spin part possible?

Adding empty element to declared container without declaring type of element

Bob has never been a M before

Stereotypical names

Simple image editor tool to draw a simple box/rectangle in an existing image

What is the opposite of 'gravitas'?

Is it legal to discriminate due to the medicine used to treat a medical condition?

Can a controlled ghast be a leader of a pack of ghouls?

Is there any significance to the Valyrian Stone vault door of Qarth?

Meta programming: Declare a new struct on the fly



Can we have a perfect cadence in a minor key?


Do different modes have the same cadence structure?Name for a group of notes made up of a root, major third, and perfect 4th?Making part of a triad chord sharper, but is it counted as minor?Triads with thirds that aren't major or minor?Name for major/minor ambiguity in cadenceIs this cadence correctly written?Is this an imperfect authentic cadence in a minor key?Is there a specific name for the use of IV chord over the V in the bass, e.g. F/G in the key of CIs the sense of resolution of a harmonic cadence psychologically “intrinsic”, or is it created through conditioning?Understanding the concept of a “Cadence”













3















I understand that, at least in the context of using a major scale, a perfect cadence is V-I. That is, if I were playing a piece in C major, I could play a chord similiar to the G major triad followed by a chord similar to the C major triad.*



What about in a minor key? If my piece is in the key of A minor, would I achieve a perfect cadence by playing an E major chord followed by an A major chord? Or would I instead have to play an E minor chord followed by an A minor chord?




Footnotes:



*I know that some theorists say that its not a perfect cadence unless the highest note of the I chord is the tonic note. For my purposes, however, I'm not using that convention.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Pascal's Wager is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    3















    I understand that, at least in the context of using a major scale, a perfect cadence is V-I. That is, if I were playing a piece in C major, I could play a chord similiar to the G major triad followed by a chord similar to the C major triad.*



    What about in a minor key? If my piece is in the key of A minor, would I achieve a perfect cadence by playing an E major chord followed by an A major chord? Or would I instead have to play an E minor chord followed by an A minor chord?




    Footnotes:



    *I know that some theorists say that its not a perfect cadence unless the highest note of the I chord is the tonic note. For my purposes, however, I'm not using that convention.










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    Pascal's Wager is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      3












      3








      3








      I understand that, at least in the context of using a major scale, a perfect cadence is V-I. That is, if I were playing a piece in C major, I could play a chord similiar to the G major triad followed by a chord similar to the C major triad.*



      What about in a minor key? If my piece is in the key of A minor, would I achieve a perfect cadence by playing an E major chord followed by an A major chord? Or would I instead have to play an E minor chord followed by an A minor chord?




      Footnotes:



      *I know that some theorists say that its not a perfect cadence unless the highest note of the I chord is the tonic note. For my purposes, however, I'm not using that convention.










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Pascal's Wager is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      I understand that, at least in the context of using a major scale, a perfect cadence is V-I. That is, if I were playing a piece in C major, I could play a chord similiar to the G major triad followed by a chord similar to the C major triad.*



      What about in a minor key? If my piece is in the key of A minor, would I achieve a perfect cadence by playing an E major chord followed by an A major chord? Or would I instead have to play an E minor chord followed by an A minor chord?




      Footnotes:



      *I know that some theorists say that its not a perfect cadence unless the highest note of the I chord is the tonic note. For my purposes, however, I'm not using that convention.







      theory chords cadence






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Pascal's Wager is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Pascal's Wager is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited yesterday









      Richard

      43.7k7102187




      43.7k7102187






      New contributor




      Pascal's Wager is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked yesterday









      Pascal's WagerPascal's Wager

      1162




      1162




      New contributor




      Pascal's Wager is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Pascal's Wager is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Pascal's Wager is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7














          For starters, we can call this cadence an authentic cadence, since by definition that is understood to be a V–I motion. The highest note distinguishes between perfect and imperfect authentic cadences.



          With that said, an authentic cadence is simply a root-position dominant moving to a root-position tonic. Whether tonic is major or minor will not affect the quality of the cadence.



          In fact, the quality of the tonic chord can be opposite of what you expect and still be considered a perfect authentic cadence. This is pretty intuitive in minor; ending on a major tonic almost makes the cadence more final. But even in major, if we suddenly cadence onto a minor tonic, this is still a perfect authentic cadence. (Although we'd certainly want to clarify that it's attenuated in some way with the unexpected shift to minor.)






          share|improve this answer


















          • 2





            'Imperfect authentic' cadence gets dangerously close to the UK 'imperfect cadence', which is the reverse of our 'perfect' cadence, i.e. I>V. Confusing, init?

            – Tim
            yesterday


















          6














          Americans seem to call a 'Perfect cadence' an 'Authentic cadence'. And there's this new thing a 'Perfect Authentic cadence'. OK, whatever. Dominant to tonic. Perfect (or Authentic) cadence.



          This is a Common Practice, Functional Harmony thing. A world where minor scales are Harmonic (at cadence points, at any rate), dominant chords are major and thus include the leading note. But tonics can be minor. The urge to 'regularise' a final cadence in a minor key with a Tierce di Picardie was not always followed!



          So, G7 - C is a Perfect cadence. So is E7 - Am. And we don't have to change that to E7 - A in order to make it one.



          Em - Am does happen, and it has every right to be considered some sort of a cadence. But it isn't a Perfect one.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 3





            I have music theory books written in the 1970s that teach the “perfect authentic cadence”. I’m not sure how old the term is beyond that but I’m not convinced it’s “new”.

            – Todd Wilcox
            yesterday






          • 2





            @ToddWilcox - probably not that new, but certainly U.S. based. In U.K. it's not a term used often, in fact, in exams, the four main cadences are the only ones used: perfect, imperfect, interrupted and plagal. Not sure, but U.S. most likely don't use any of those terms!

            – Tim
            yesterday






          • 2





            @Tim I was taught all of those terms. In the U.S.

            – Todd Wilcox
            yesterday












          • A book called Woodruff’s Comprehensive Music Course from 1899 has a section on the “perfect authentic cadence”. It does appear to be an American book.

            – Todd Wilcox
            yesterday











          • @ToddWilcox - it would be good to have a list of all cadences, to use as a reference point.

            – Tim
            yesterday


















          0














          Yes. It is possible to have a perfect cadence in a minor key. The final chord needn't be major: in the key of a minor, the chords E major followed by a minor are a V-i cadence, which is a perfect cadence.



          (It doesn't matter what notes are on the tops of either of the chords.)






          share|improve this answer






















            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "240"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );






            Pascal's Wager is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81886%2fcan-we-have-a-perfect-cadence-in-a-minor-key%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            7














            For starters, we can call this cadence an authentic cadence, since by definition that is understood to be a V–I motion. The highest note distinguishes between perfect and imperfect authentic cadences.



            With that said, an authentic cadence is simply a root-position dominant moving to a root-position tonic. Whether tonic is major or minor will not affect the quality of the cadence.



            In fact, the quality of the tonic chord can be opposite of what you expect and still be considered a perfect authentic cadence. This is pretty intuitive in minor; ending on a major tonic almost makes the cadence more final. But even in major, if we suddenly cadence onto a minor tonic, this is still a perfect authentic cadence. (Although we'd certainly want to clarify that it's attenuated in some way with the unexpected shift to minor.)






            share|improve this answer


















            • 2





              'Imperfect authentic' cadence gets dangerously close to the UK 'imperfect cadence', which is the reverse of our 'perfect' cadence, i.e. I>V. Confusing, init?

              – Tim
              yesterday















            7














            For starters, we can call this cadence an authentic cadence, since by definition that is understood to be a V–I motion. The highest note distinguishes between perfect and imperfect authentic cadences.



            With that said, an authentic cadence is simply a root-position dominant moving to a root-position tonic. Whether tonic is major or minor will not affect the quality of the cadence.



            In fact, the quality of the tonic chord can be opposite of what you expect and still be considered a perfect authentic cadence. This is pretty intuitive in minor; ending on a major tonic almost makes the cadence more final. But even in major, if we suddenly cadence onto a minor tonic, this is still a perfect authentic cadence. (Although we'd certainly want to clarify that it's attenuated in some way with the unexpected shift to minor.)






            share|improve this answer


















            • 2





              'Imperfect authentic' cadence gets dangerously close to the UK 'imperfect cadence', which is the reverse of our 'perfect' cadence, i.e. I>V. Confusing, init?

              – Tim
              yesterday













            7












            7








            7







            For starters, we can call this cadence an authentic cadence, since by definition that is understood to be a V–I motion. The highest note distinguishes between perfect and imperfect authentic cadences.



            With that said, an authentic cadence is simply a root-position dominant moving to a root-position tonic. Whether tonic is major or minor will not affect the quality of the cadence.



            In fact, the quality of the tonic chord can be opposite of what you expect and still be considered a perfect authentic cadence. This is pretty intuitive in minor; ending on a major tonic almost makes the cadence more final. But even in major, if we suddenly cadence onto a minor tonic, this is still a perfect authentic cadence. (Although we'd certainly want to clarify that it's attenuated in some way with the unexpected shift to minor.)






            share|improve this answer













            For starters, we can call this cadence an authentic cadence, since by definition that is understood to be a V–I motion. The highest note distinguishes between perfect and imperfect authentic cadences.



            With that said, an authentic cadence is simply a root-position dominant moving to a root-position tonic. Whether tonic is major or minor will not affect the quality of the cadence.



            In fact, the quality of the tonic chord can be opposite of what you expect and still be considered a perfect authentic cadence. This is pretty intuitive in minor; ending on a major tonic almost makes the cadence more final. But even in major, if we suddenly cadence onto a minor tonic, this is still a perfect authentic cadence. (Although we'd certainly want to clarify that it's attenuated in some way with the unexpected shift to minor.)







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered yesterday









            RichardRichard

            43.7k7102187




            43.7k7102187







            • 2





              'Imperfect authentic' cadence gets dangerously close to the UK 'imperfect cadence', which is the reverse of our 'perfect' cadence, i.e. I>V. Confusing, init?

              – Tim
              yesterday












            • 2





              'Imperfect authentic' cadence gets dangerously close to the UK 'imperfect cadence', which is the reverse of our 'perfect' cadence, i.e. I>V. Confusing, init?

              – Tim
              yesterday







            2




            2





            'Imperfect authentic' cadence gets dangerously close to the UK 'imperfect cadence', which is the reverse of our 'perfect' cadence, i.e. I>V. Confusing, init?

            – Tim
            yesterday





            'Imperfect authentic' cadence gets dangerously close to the UK 'imperfect cadence', which is the reverse of our 'perfect' cadence, i.e. I>V. Confusing, init?

            – Tim
            yesterday











            6














            Americans seem to call a 'Perfect cadence' an 'Authentic cadence'. And there's this new thing a 'Perfect Authentic cadence'. OK, whatever. Dominant to tonic. Perfect (or Authentic) cadence.



            This is a Common Practice, Functional Harmony thing. A world where minor scales are Harmonic (at cadence points, at any rate), dominant chords are major and thus include the leading note. But tonics can be minor. The urge to 'regularise' a final cadence in a minor key with a Tierce di Picardie was not always followed!



            So, G7 - C is a Perfect cadence. So is E7 - Am. And we don't have to change that to E7 - A in order to make it one.



            Em - Am does happen, and it has every right to be considered some sort of a cadence. But it isn't a Perfect one.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 3





              I have music theory books written in the 1970s that teach the “perfect authentic cadence”. I’m not sure how old the term is beyond that but I’m not convinced it’s “new”.

              – Todd Wilcox
              yesterday






            • 2





              @ToddWilcox - probably not that new, but certainly U.S. based. In U.K. it's not a term used often, in fact, in exams, the four main cadences are the only ones used: perfect, imperfect, interrupted and plagal. Not sure, but U.S. most likely don't use any of those terms!

              – Tim
              yesterday






            • 2





              @Tim I was taught all of those terms. In the U.S.

              – Todd Wilcox
              yesterday












            • A book called Woodruff’s Comprehensive Music Course from 1899 has a section on the “perfect authentic cadence”. It does appear to be an American book.

              – Todd Wilcox
              yesterday











            • @ToddWilcox - it would be good to have a list of all cadences, to use as a reference point.

              – Tim
              yesterday















            6














            Americans seem to call a 'Perfect cadence' an 'Authentic cadence'. And there's this new thing a 'Perfect Authentic cadence'. OK, whatever. Dominant to tonic. Perfect (or Authentic) cadence.



            This is a Common Practice, Functional Harmony thing. A world where minor scales are Harmonic (at cadence points, at any rate), dominant chords are major and thus include the leading note. But tonics can be minor. The urge to 'regularise' a final cadence in a minor key with a Tierce di Picardie was not always followed!



            So, G7 - C is a Perfect cadence. So is E7 - Am. And we don't have to change that to E7 - A in order to make it one.



            Em - Am does happen, and it has every right to be considered some sort of a cadence. But it isn't a Perfect one.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 3





              I have music theory books written in the 1970s that teach the “perfect authentic cadence”. I’m not sure how old the term is beyond that but I’m not convinced it’s “new”.

              – Todd Wilcox
              yesterday






            • 2





              @ToddWilcox - probably not that new, but certainly U.S. based. In U.K. it's not a term used often, in fact, in exams, the four main cadences are the only ones used: perfect, imperfect, interrupted and plagal. Not sure, but U.S. most likely don't use any of those terms!

              – Tim
              yesterday






            • 2





              @Tim I was taught all of those terms. In the U.S.

              – Todd Wilcox
              yesterday












            • A book called Woodruff’s Comprehensive Music Course from 1899 has a section on the “perfect authentic cadence”. It does appear to be an American book.

              – Todd Wilcox
              yesterday











            • @ToddWilcox - it would be good to have a list of all cadences, to use as a reference point.

              – Tim
              yesterday













            6












            6








            6







            Americans seem to call a 'Perfect cadence' an 'Authentic cadence'. And there's this new thing a 'Perfect Authentic cadence'. OK, whatever. Dominant to tonic. Perfect (or Authentic) cadence.



            This is a Common Practice, Functional Harmony thing. A world where minor scales are Harmonic (at cadence points, at any rate), dominant chords are major and thus include the leading note. But tonics can be minor. The urge to 'regularise' a final cadence in a minor key with a Tierce di Picardie was not always followed!



            So, G7 - C is a Perfect cadence. So is E7 - Am. And we don't have to change that to E7 - A in order to make it one.



            Em - Am does happen, and it has every right to be considered some sort of a cadence. But it isn't a Perfect one.






            share|improve this answer













            Americans seem to call a 'Perfect cadence' an 'Authentic cadence'. And there's this new thing a 'Perfect Authentic cadence'. OK, whatever. Dominant to tonic. Perfect (or Authentic) cadence.



            This is a Common Practice, Functional Harmony thing. A world where minor scales are Harmonic (at cadence points, at any rate), dominant chords are major and thus include the leading note. But tonics can be minor. The urge to 'regularise' a final cadence in a minor key with a Tierce di Picardie was not always followed!



            So, G7 - C is a Perfect cadence. So is E7 - Am. And we don't have to change that to E7 - A in order to make it one.



            Em - Am does happen, and it has every right to be considered some sort of a cadence. But it isn't a Perfect one.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered yesterday









            Laurence PayneLaurence Payne

            36.7k1671




            36.7k1671







            • 3





              I have music theory books written in the 1970s that teach the “perfect authentic cadence”. I’m not sure how old the term is beyond that but I’m not convinced it’s “new”.

              – Todd Wilcox
              yesterday






            • 2





              @ToddWilcox - probably not that new, but certainly U.S. based. In U.K. it's not a term used often, in fact, in exams, the four main cadences are the only ones used: perfect, imperfect, interrupted and plagal. Not sure, but U.S. most likely don't use any of those terms!

              – Tim
              yesterday






            • 2





              @Tim I was taught all of those terms. In the U.S.

              – Todd Wilcox
              yesterday












            • A book called Woodruff’s Comprehensive Music Course from 1899 has a section on the “perfect authentic cadence”. It does appear to be an American book.

              – Todd Wilcox
              yesterday











            • @ToddWilcox - it would be good to have a list of all cadences, to use as a reference point.

              – Tim
              yesterday












            • 3





              I have music theory books written in the 1970s that teach the “perfect authentic cadence”. I’m not sure how old the term is beyond that but I’m not convinced it’s “new”.

              – Todd Wilcox
              yesterday






            • 2





              @ToddWilcox - probably not that new, but certainly U.S. based. In U.K. it's not a term used often, in fact, in exams, the four main cadences are the only ones used: perfect, imperfect, interrupted and plagal. Not sure, but U.S. most likely don't use any of those terms!

              – Tim
              yesterday






            • 2





              @Tim I was taught all of those terms. In the U.S.

              – Todd Wilcox
              yesterday












            • A book called Woodruff’s Comprehensive Music Course from 1899 has a section on the “perfect authentic cadence”. It does appear to be an American book.

              – Todd Wilcox
              yesterday











            • @ToddWilcox - it would be good to have a list of all cadences, to use as a reference point.

              – Tim
              yesterday







            3




            3





            I have music theory books written in the 1970s that teach the “perfect authentic cadence”. I’m not sure how old the term is beyond that but I’m not convinced it’s “new”.

            – Todd Wilcox
            yesterday





            I have music theory books written in the 1970s that teach the “perfect authentic cadence”. I’m not sure how old the term is beyond that but I’m not convinced it’s “new”.

            – Todd Wilcox
            yesterday




            2




            2





            @ToddWilcox - probably not that new, but certainly U.S. based. In U.K. it's not a term used often, in fact, in exams, the four main cadences are the only ones used: perfect, imperfect, interrupted and plagal. Not sure, but U.S. most likely don't use any of those terms!

            – Tim
            yesterday





            @ToddWilcox - probably not that new, but certainly U.S. based. In U.K. it's not a term used often, in fact, in exams, the four main cadences are the only ones used: perfect, imperfect, interrupted and plagal. Not sure, but U.S. most likely don't use any of those terms!

            – Tim
            yesterday




            2




            2





            @Tim I was taught all of those terms. In the U.S.

            – Todd Wilcox
            yesterday






            @Tim I was taught all of those terms. In the U.S.

            – Todd Wilcox
            yesterday














            A book called Woodruff’s Comprehensive Music Course from 1899 has a section on the “perfect authentic cadence”. It does appear to be an American book.

            – Todd Wilcox
            yesterday





            A book called Woodruff’s Comprehensive Music Course from 1899 has a section on the “perfect authentic cadence”. It does appear to be an American book.

            – Todd Wilcox
            yesterday













            @ToddWilcox - it would be good to have a list of all cadences, to use as a reference point.

            – Tim
            yesterday





            @ToddWilcox - it would be good to have a list of all cadences, to use as a reference point.

            – Tim
            yesterday











            0














            Yes. It is possible to have a perfect cadence in a minor key. The final chord needn't be major: in the key of a minor, the chords E major followed by a minor are a V-i cadence, which is a perfect cadence.



            (It doesn't matter what notes are on the tops of either of the chords.)






            share|improve this answer



























              0














              Yes. It is possible to have a perfect cadence in a minor key. The final chord needn't be major: in the key of a minor, the chords E major followed by a minor are a V-i cadence, which is a perfect cadence.



              (It doesn't matter what notes are on the tops of either of the chords.)






              share|improve this answer

























                0












                0








                0







                Yes. It is possible to have a perfect cadence in a minor key. The final chord needn't be major: in the key of a minor, the chords E major followed by a minor are a V-i cadence, which is a perfect cadence.



                (It doesn't matter what notes are on the tops of either of the chords.)






                share|improve this answer













                Yes. It is possible to have a perfect cadence in a minor key. The final chord needn't be major: in the key of a minor, the chords E major followed by a minor are a V-i cadence, which is a perfect cadence.



                (It doesn't matter what notes are on the tops of either of the chords.)







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 3 hours ago









                Rosie FRosie F

                1,441314




                1,441314




















                    Pascal's Wager is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    Pascal's Wager is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    Pascal's Wager is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                    Pascal's Wager is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81886%2fcan-we-have-a-perfect-cadence-in-a-minor-key%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Sum ergo cogito? 1 nng

                    三茅街道4182Guuntc Dn precexpngmageondP