Benefits of air-launching a rocketWhy aren't all satellite-carrying rockets launched from airplanes?Is the “airship to orbit” mission profile feasible?Why aren't all satellite-carrying rockets launched from airplanes?Is the “airship to orbit” mission profile feasible?Why are spacecraft not air-launched from airplanesRange safety for air-launch vehiclesFloating LaunchShould all the Air-Launch systems be deployed at sub-sonic speeds?Is it coincidence that the Electron has very similar dimensions to the Pegasus?Air-launching an Electron-like LOX-based rocket from a plane; technical challenges?All dressed up and no place to go; who will be Stratolauncher's aircraft-launched rocket?
How to fry ground beef so it is well-browned
Why must Chinese maps be obfuscated?
Is the claim "Employers won't employ people with no 'social media presence'" realistic?
Which big number is bigger?
How to write a column outside the braces in a matrix?
Can I criticise the more senior developers around me for not writing clean code?
Why does nature favour the Laplacian?
Is there really no use for MD5 anymore?
Is there a way to generate a list of distinct numbers such that no two subsets ever have an equal sum?
Should the Death Curse affect an undead PC in the Tomb of Annihilation adventure?
Why do games have consumables?
Get consecutive integer number ranges from list of int
How to stop co-workers from teasing me because I know Russian?
Critique of timeline aesthetic
Contradiction proof for inequality of P and NP?
What does ゆーか mean?
As an international instructor, should I openly talk about my accent?
On The Origin of Dissonant Chords
What happens to Mjolnir (Thor's hammer) at the end of Endgame?
What are the steps to solving this definite integral?
Could the terminal length of components like resistors be reduced?
Function pointer with named arguments?
Providing evidence of Consent of Parents for Marriage by minor in England in early 1800s?
Can someone publish a story that happened to you?
Benefits of air-launching a rocket
Why aren't all satellite-carrying rockets launched from airplanes?Is the “airship to orbit” mission profile feasible?Why aren't all satellite-carrying rockets launched from airplanes?Is the “airship to orbit” mission profile feasible?Why are spacecraft not air-launched from airplanesRange safety for air-launch vehiclesFloating LaunchShould all the Air-Launch systems be deployed at sub-sonic speeds?Is it coincidence that the Electron has very similar dimensions to the Pegasus?Air-launching an Electron-like LOX-based rocket from a plane; technical challenges?All dressed up and no place to go; who will be Stratolauncher's aircraft-launched rocket?
$begingroup$
Is there a way to quantify how much you would gain by air-launching a rocket compared to a ground launch?
air-launch
asked Apr 22 at 13:17
HobbesHobbes
96.7k2272427
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there a way to quantify how much you would gain by air-launching a rocket compared to a ground launch?
air-launch
asked Apr 22 at 13:17
HobbesHobbes
96.7k2272427
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Possible duplicates: Why aren't all satellite-carrying rockets launched from airplanes?, Is the “airship to orbit” mission profile feasible?
$endgroup$
– DarkDust
Apr 22 at 14:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there a way to quantify how much you would gain by air-launching a rocket compared to a ground launch?
air-launch
asked Apr 22 at 13:17
HobbesHobbes
96.7k2272427
$endgroup$
Is there a way to quantify how much you would gain by air-launching a rocket compared to a ground launch?
air-launch
air-launch
asked Apr 22 at 13:17
HobbesHobbes
96.7k2272427
asked Apr 22 at 13:17
HobbesHobbes
96.7k2272427
asked Apr 22 at 13:17
HobbesHobbes
96.7k2272427
asked Apr 22 at 13:17
HobbesHobbes
96.7k2272427
asked Apr 22 at 13:17
HobbesHobbes
96.7k2272427
96.7k2272427
1
$begingroup$
Possible duplicates: Why aren't all satellite-carrying rockets launched from airplanes?, Is the “airship to orbit” mission profile feasible?
$endgroup$
– DarkDust
Apr 22 at 14:14
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Possible duplicates: Why aren't all satellite-carrying rockets launched from airplanes?, Is the “airship to orbit” mission profile feasible?
$endgroup$
– DarkDust
Apr 22 at 14:14
1
1
$begingroup$
Possible duplicates: Why aren't all satellite-carrying rockets launched from airplanes?, Is the “airship to orbit” mission profile feasible?
$endgroup$
– DarkDust
Apr 22 at 14:14
$begingroup$
Possible duplicates: Why aren't all satellite-carrying rockets launched from airplanes?, Is the “airship to orbit” mission profile feasible?
$endgroup$
– DarkDust
Apr 22 at 14:14
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I came across a fairly detailed comparison made by the team that worked on Interim HOTOL.
Delta-v required for a vertical launch SSTO (e.g. Delta Clipper) to LEO: 9361 m/s
For Interim Hotol:
- speed supplied by launch aircraft (An-225), launching at Mach 0.8 at 9 km altitude: - 235 m/s
- drag loss: + 67 m/s
- gravity losses: - 670 m/s
- Isp underexpansion losses at low altitude: - 180 m/s
- Thrust vectoring demands: + 10 m/s
- Improved engine Isp due to altitude start: - 214 m/s
for a total reduction in delta-V of 1222 m/s, or 13%, translating into a 24% reduction in propellant requirement.
From the book 'Spaceflight in the era of aero-space planes' (R. Hannigan, Krieger publishing, 1994).
answered Apr 22 at 13:26
HobbesHobbes
96.7k2272427
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Are the +67m/s drag loss related to the attitude change, from horizontal to suborbital trajectory? And are drag gains (from not having to go through 9km of dense atmosphere) already summed up into this result of +67?
$endgroup$
– qq jkztd
Apr 22 at 14:34
1
$begingroup$
"Isp underexpansion losses at low altitude" and "improved engine Isp due to altitude start" seem like they should be the same thing, so I'm a little suspicious of this accounting.
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
Apr 22 at 14:39
$begingroup$
The book doesn't go into more detail than what I've supplied. The calculation was originally made by BAe and TsAGI for a presentation to ESA.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
Apr 22 at 15:03
$begingroup$
Could this be the difference? 'Isp underexpansion losses' are the losses you avoid by not running the rocket at 0-9 km altitude, and 'improved engine Isp' is the gain you get by tuning the nozzle for the 9km+ regime.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
Apr 22 at 15:48
$begingroup$
What's interesting about this is while Elon Musk has said it's only around a 5% savings, this comparison shows substantially more.
$endgroup$
– TemporalWolf
Apr 22 at 20:18
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f35712%2fbenefits-of-air-launching-a-rocket%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I came across a fairly detailed comparison made by the team that worked on Interim HOTOL.
Delta-v required for a vertical launch SSTO (e.g. Delta Clipper) to LEO: 9361 m/s
For Interim Hotol:
- speed supplied by launch aircraft (An-225), launching at Mach 0.8 at 9 km altitude: - 235 m/s
- drag loss: + 67 m/s
- gravity losses: - 670 m/s
- Isp underexpansion losses at low altitude: - 180 m/s
- Thrust vectoring demands: + 10 m/s
- Improved engine Isp due to altitude start: - 214 m/s
for a total reduction in delta-V of 1222 m/s, or 13%, translating into a 24% reduction in propellant requirement.
From the book 'Spaceflight in the era of aero-space planes' (R. Hannigan, Krieger publishing, 1994).
answered Apr 22 at 13:26
HobbesHobbes
96.7k2272427
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Are the +67m/s drag loss related to the attitude change, from horizontal to suborbital trajectory? And are drag gains (from not having to go through 9km of dense atmosphere) already summed up into this result of +67?
$endgroup$
– qq jkztd
Apr 22 at 14:34
1
$begingroup$
"Isp underexpansion losses at low altitude" and "improved engine Isp due to altitude start" seem like they should be the same thing, so I'm a little suspicious of this accounting.
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
Apr 22 at 14:39
$begingroup$
The book doesn't go into more detail than what I've supplied. The calculation was originally made by BAe and TsAGI for a presentation to ESA.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
Apr 22 at 15:03
$begingroup$
Could this be the difference? 'Isp underexpansion losses' are the losses you avoid by not running the rocket at 0-9 km altitude, and 'improved engine Isp' is the gain you get by tuning the nozzle for the 9km+ regime.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
Apr 22 at 15:48
$begingroup$
What's interesting about this is while Elon Musk has said it's only around a 5% savings, this comparison shows substantially more.
$endgroup$
– TemporalWolf
Apr 22 at 20:18
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I came across a fairly detailed comparison made by the team that worked on Interim HOTOL.
Delta-v required for a vertical launch SSTO (e.g. Delta Clipper) to LEO: 9361 m/s
For Interim Hotol:
- speed supplied by launch aircraft (An-225), launching at Mach 0.8 at 9 km altitude: - 235 m/s
- drag loss: + 67 m/s
- gravity losses: - 670 m/s
- Isp underexpansion losses at low altitude: - 180 m/s
- Thrust vectoring demands: + 10 m/s
- Improved engine Isp due to altitude start: - 214 m/s
for a total reduction in delta-V of 1222 m/s, or 13%, translating into a 24% reduction in propellant requirement.
From the book 'Spaceflight in the era of aero-space planes' (R. Hannigan, Krieger publishing, 1994).
answered Apr 22 at 13:26
HobbesHobbes
96.7k2272427
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Are the +67m/s drag loss related to the attitude change, from horizontal to suborbital trajectory? And are drag gains (from not having to go through 9km of dense atmosphere) already summed up into this result of +67?
$endgroup$
– qq jkztd
Apr 22 at 14:34
1
$begingroup$
"Isp underexpansion losses at low altitude" and "improved engine Isp due to altitude start" seem like they should be the same thing, so I'm a little suspicious of this accounting.
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
Apr 22 at 14:39
$begingroup$
The book doesn't go into more detail than what I've supplied. The calculation was originally made by BAe and TsAGI for a presentation to ESA.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
Apr 22 at 15:03
$begingroup$
Could this be the difference? 'Isp underexpansion losses' are the losses you avoid by not running the rocket at 0-9 km altitude, and 'improved engine Isp' is the gain you get by tuning the nozzle for the 9km+ regime.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
Apr 22 at 15:48
$begingroup$
What's interesting about this is while Elon Musk has said it's only around a 5% savings, this comparison shows substantially more.
$endgroup$
– TemporalWolf
Apr 22 at 20:18
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I came across a fairly detailed comparison made by the team that worked on Interim HOTOL.
Delta-v required for a vertical launch SSTO (e.g. Delta Clipper) to LEO: 9361 m/s
For Interim Hotol:
- speed supplied by launch aircraft (An-225), launching at Mach 0.8 at 9 km altitude: - 235 m/s
- drag loss: + 67 m/s
- gravity losses: - 670 m/s
- Isp underexpansion losses at low altitude: - 180 m/s
- Thrust vectoring demands: + 10 m/s
- Improved engine Isp due to altitude start: - 214 m/s
for a total reduction in delta-V of 1222 m/s, or 13%, translating into a 24% reduction in propellant requirement.
From the book 'Spaceflight in the era of aero-space planes' (R. Hannigan, Krieger publishing, 1994).
answered Apr 22 at 13:26
HobbesHobbes
96.7k2272427
$endgroup$
I came across a fairly detailed comparison made by the team that worked on Interim HOTOL.
Delta-v required for a vertical launch SSTO (e.g. Delta Clipper) to LEO: 9361 m/s
For Interim Hotol:
- speed supplied by launch aircraft (An-225), launching at Mach 0.8 at 9 km altitude: - 235 m/s
- drag loss: + 67 m/s
- gravity losses: - 670 m/s
- Isp underexpansion losses at low altitude: - 180 m/s
- Thrust vectoring demands: + 10 m/s
- Improved engine Isp due to altitude start: - 214 m/s
for a total reduction in delta-V of 1222 m/s, or 13%, translating into a 24% reduction in propellant requirement.
From the book 'Spaceflight in the era of aero-space planes' (R. Hannigan, Krieger publishing, 1994).
answered Apr 22 at 13:26
HobbesHobbes
96.7k2272427
answered Apr 22 at 13:26
HobbesHobbes
96.7k2272427
answered Apr 22 at 13:26
HobbesHobbes
96.7k2272427
answered Apr 22 at 13:26
HobbesHobbes
96.7k2272427
96.7k2272427
$begingroup$
Are the +67m/s drag loss related to the attitude change, from horizontal to suborbital trajectory? And are drag gains (from not having to go through 9km of dense atmosphere) already summed up into this result of +67?
$endgroup$
– qq jkztd
Apr 22 at 14:34
1
$begingroup$
"Isp underexpansion losses at low altitude" and "improved engine Isp due to altitude start" seem like they should be the same thing, so I'm a little suspicious of this accounting.
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
Apr 22 at 14:39
$begingroup$
The book doesn't go into more detail than what I've supplied. The calculation was originally made by BAe and TsAGI for a presentation to ESA.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
Apr 22 at 15:03
$begingroup$
Could this be the difference? 'Isp underexpansion losses' are the losses you avoid by not running the rocket at 0-9 km altitude, and 'improved engine Isp' is the gain you get by tuning the nozzle for the 9km+ regime.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
Apr 22 at 15:48
$begingroup$
What's interesting about this is while Elon Musk has said it's only around a 5% savings, this comparison shows substantially more.
$endgroup$
– TemporalWolf
Apr 22 at 20:18
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Are the +67m/s drag loss related to the attitude change, from horizontal to suborbital trajectory? And are drag gains (from not having to go through 9km of dense atmosphere) already summed up into this result of +67?
$endgroup$
– qq jkztd
Apr 22 at 14:34
1
$begingroup$
"Isp underexpansion losses at low altitude" and "improved engine Isp due to altitude start" seem like they should be the same thing, so I'm a little suspicious of this accounting.
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
Apr 22 at 14:39
$begingroup$
The book doesn't go into more detail than what I've supplied. The calculation was originally made by BAe and TsAGI for a presentation to ESA.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
Apr 22 at 15:03
$begingroup$
Could this be the difference? 'Isp underexpansion losses' are the losses you avoid by not running the rocket at 0-9 km altitude, and 'improved engine Isp' is the gain you get by tuning the nozzle for the 9km+ regime.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
Apr 22 at 15:48
$begingroup$
What's interesting about this is while Elon Musk has said it's only around a 5% savings, this comparison shows substantially more.
$endgroup$
– TemporalWolf
Apr 22 at 20:18
$begingroup$
Are the +67m/s drag loss related to the attitude change, from horizontal to suborbital trajectory? And are drag gains (from not having to go through 9km of dense atmosphere) already summed up into this result of +67?
$endgroup$
– qq jkztd
Apr 22 at 14:34
$begingroup$
Are the +67m/s drag loss related to the attitude change, from horizontal to suborbital trajectory? And are drag gains (from not having to go through 9km of dense atmosphere) already summed up into this result of +67?
$endgroup$
– qq jkztd
Apr 22 at 14:34
1
1
$begingroup$
"Isp underexpansion losses at low altitude" and "improved engine Isp due to altitude start" seem like they should be the same thing, so I'm a little suspicious of this accounting.
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
Apr 22 at 14:39
$begingroup$
"Isp underexpansion losses at low altitude" and "improved engine Isp due to altitude start" seem like they should be the same thing, so I'm a little suspicious of this accounting.
$endgroup$
– Russell Borogove
Apr 22 at 14:39
$begingroup$
The book doesn't go into more detail than what I've supplied. The calculation was originally made by BAe and TsAGI for a presentation to ESA.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
Apr 22 at 15:03
$begingroup$
The book doesn't go into more detail than what I've supplied. The calculation was originally made by BAe and TsAGI for a presentation to ESA.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
Apr 22 at 15:03
$begingroup$
Could this be the difference? 'Isp underexpansion losses' are the losses you avoid by not running the rocket at 0-9 km altitude, and 'improved engine Isp' is the gain you get by tuning the nozzle for the 9km+ regime.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
Apr 22 at 15:48
$begingroup$
Could this be the difference? 'Isp underexpansion losses' are the losses you avoid by not running the rocket at 0-9 km altitude, and 'improved engine Isp' is the gain you get by tuning the nozzle for the 9km+ regime.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
Apr 22 at 15:48
$begingroup$
What's interesting about this is while Elon Musk has said it's only around a 5% savings, this comparison shows substantially more.
$endgroup$
– TemporalWolf
Apr 22 at 20:18
$begingroup$
What's interesting about this is while Elon Musk has said it's only around a 5% savings, this comparison shows substantially more.
$endgroup$
– TemporalWolf
Apr 22 at 20:18
|
show 2 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f35712%2fbenefits-of-air-launching-a-rocket%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Possible duplicates: Why aren't all satellite-carrying rockets launched from airplanes?, Is the “airship to orbit” mission profile feasible?
$endgroup$
– DarkDust
Apr 22 at 14:14