Is there a way to fake a method response using Mock or Stubs?Does HttpCalloutMock work when the tested method doesn't return HttpResponse?Mock class not working with Dynamic & Unique end-pointHTTP Mock Response class has 0 coverageIs there a way to create more than 50000 records in a unit test context?Mock Service .setBody()Post callout behavior assertions for unit test with static resource callout mock failBasic Mock Test Coverage HelpHow can I reference a trigger's method and/or variable from a test class?Can we mock relationships in Apex?Method Is Not Visible: APEX Trailhead Unit Testing Challenge
How to solve constants out of the internal energy equation?
What does KSP mean?
What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?
How to have a sharp product image?
Does the sign matter for proportionality?
Will a top journal at least read my introduction?
How could Tony Stark make this in Endgame?
How can I practically buy stocks?
Does a semiconductor follow Ohm's law?
Are Boeing 737-800’s grounded?
What are the potential pitfalls when using metals as a currency?
Why do Computer Science majors learn Calculus?
A Note on N!
How come there are so many candidates for the 2020 Democratic party presidential nomination?
how to sum variables from file in bash
Unexpected email from Yorkshire Bank
Why does processed meat contain preservatives, while canned fish needs not?
Was there a Viking Exchange as well as a Columbian one?
Please, smoke with good manners
Why was Germany not as successful as other Europeans in establishing overseas colonies?
Packing rectangles: Does rotation ever help?
How exactly does Hawking radiation decrease the mass of black holes?
Can someone publish a story that happened to you?
Examples of subgroups where it's nontrivial to show closure under multiplication?
Is there a way to fake a method response using Mock or Stubs?
Does HttpCalloutMock work when the tested method doesn't return HttpResponse?Mock class not working with Dynamic & Unique end-pointHTTP Mock Response class has 0 coverageIs there a way to create more than 50000 records in a unit test context?Mock Service .setBody()Post callout behavior assertions for unit test with static resource callout mock failBasic Mock Test Coverage HelpHow can I reference a trigger's method and/or variable from a test class?Can we mock relationships in Apex?Method Is Not Visible: APEX Trailhead Unit Testing Challenge
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I have a helper method in my code called canQueryObject, and that method returns a boolean. I have some code that calls the method via the following line of code:
if(!myObjectHelper.canQueryObject(Schema.SObjectType.<<objectType>>)) ...
I'd like to test some scenarios where the scenario is false. Is there a way I can use Mock or Stubs in a unit-test to set canQueryObject to false?
unit-test mock
asked Apr 23 at 19:22
WEFXWEFX
1699
add a comment |
I have a helper method in my code called canQueryObject, and that method returns a boolean. I have some code that calls the method via the following line of code:
if(!myObjectHelper.canQueryObject(Schema.SObjectType.<<objectType>>)) ...
I'd like to test some scenarios where the scenario is false. Is there a way I can use Mock or Stubs in a unit-test to set canQueryObject to false?
unit-test mock
asked Apr 23 at 19:22
WEFXWEFX
1699
Can you create a user in your test that has no access to the object then runAs that use?
– Eric
Apr 24 at 4:25
add a comment |
I have a helper method in my code called canQueryObject, and that method returns a boolean. I have some code that calls the method via the following line of code:
if(!myObjectHelper.canQueryObject(Schema.SObjectType.<<objectType>>)) ...
I'd like to test some scenarios where the scenario is false. Is there a way I can use Mock or Stubs in a unit-test to set canQueryObject to false?
unit-test mock
asked Apr 23 at 19:22
WEFXWEFX
1699
I have a helper method in my code called canQueryObject, and that method returns a boolean. I have some code that calls the method via the following line of code:
if(!myObjectHelper.canQueryObject(Schema.SObjectType.<<objectType>>)) ...
I'd like to test some scenarios where the scenario is false. Is there a way I can use Mock or Stubs in a unit-test to set canQueryObject to false?
unit-test mock
unit-test mock
asked Apr 23 at 19:22
WEFXWEFX
1699
asked Apr 23 at 19:22
WEFXWEFX
1699
edited Apr 23 at 19:42
WEFX
asked Apr 23 at 19:22
WEFXWEFX
1699
asked Apr 23 at 19:22
WEFXWEFX
1699
asked Apr 23 at 19:22
WEFXWEFX
1699
1699
Can you create a user in your test that has no access to the object then runAs that use?
– Eric
Apr 24 at 4:25
add a comment |
Can you create a user in your test that has no access to the object then runAs that use?
– Eric
Apr 24 at 4:25
Can you create a user in your test that has no access to the object then runAs that use?
– Eric
Apr 24 at 4:25
Can you create a user in your test that has no access to the object then runAs that use?
– Eric
Apr 24 at 4:25
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I typically use a fairly simple pattern and don't bring in a framework. It would look something like the following:
public virtual with sharing class MyObjectHelper
static MyObjectHelper instance = new MyObjectHelper();
@TestVisible static void setMock(MyObjectHelper mock) instance = mock;
public static Boolean canQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return instance.getCanQueryObject(sObjectType);
// the two method names cannot match or you will get a compile fail
protected virtual Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return sObjectType.getDescribe().isQueryable();
Then in your test, you can have a mock return always true or always false, as you wish.
@IsTest
class MyObjectHelperTests
class HelperMock extends MyObjectHelper
Boolean isQueryable = true;
protected override Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return isQueryable;
@IsTest static void testCannotQuery()
HelperMock mock = new HelperMock();
mock.isQueryable = false;
MyObjectHelper.setMock(mock);
Test.startTest();
Boolean canQuery = MyObjectHelper.canQueryObject(...);
Test.stopTest();
system.assertEquals(false, canQuery, 'Some informative message');
answered Apr 23 at 19:47
Adrian Larson♦Adrian Larson
111k19122260
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "459"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f258841%2fis-there-a-way-to-fake-a-method-response-using-mock-or-stubs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I typically use a fairly simple pattern and don't bring in a framework. It would look something like the following:
public virtual with sharing class MyObjectHelper
static MyObjectHelper instance = new MyObjectHelper();
@TestVisible static void setMock(MyObjectHelper mock) instance = mock;
public static Boolean canQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return instance.getCanQueryObject(sObjectType);
// the two method names cannot match or you will get a compile fail
protected virtual Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return sObjectType.getDescribe().isQueryable();
Then in your test, you can have a mock return always true or always false, as you wish.
@IsTest
class MyObjectHelperTests
class HelperMock extends MyObjectHelper
Boolean isQueryable = true;
protected override Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return isQueryable;
@IsTest static void testCannotQuery()
HelperMock mock = new HelperMock();
mock.isQueryable = false;
MyObjectHelper.setMock(mock);
Test.startTest();
Boolean canQuery = MyObjectHelper.canQueryObject(...);
Test.stopTest();
system.assertEquals(false, canQuery, 'Some informative message');
answered Apr 23 at 19:47
Adrian Larson♦Adrian Larson
111k19122260
add a comment |
I typically use a fairly simple pattern and don't bring in a framework. It would look something like the following:
public virtual with sharing class MyObjectHelper
static MyObjectHelper instance = new MyObjectHelper();
@TestVisible static void setMock(MyObjectHelper mock) instance = mock;
public static Boolean canQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return instance.getCanQueryObject(sObjectType);
// the two method names cannot match or you will get a compile fail
protected virtual Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return sObjectType.getDescribe().isQueryable();
Then in your test, you can have a mock return always true or always false, as you wish.
@IsTest
class MyObjectHelperTests
class HelperMock extends MyObjectHelper
Boolean isQueryable = true;
protected override Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return isQueryable;
@IsTest static void testCannotQuery()
HelperMock mock = new HelperMock();
mock.isQueryable = false;
MyObjectHelper.setMock(mock);
Test.startTest();
Boolean canQuery = MyObjectHelper.canQueryObject(...);
Test.stopTest();
system.assertEquals(false, canQuery, 'Some informative message');
answered Apr 23 at 19:47
Adrian Larson♦Adrian Larson
111k19122260
add a comment |
I typically use a fairly simple pattern and don't bring in a framework. It would look something like the following:
public virtual with sharing class MyObjectHelper
static MyObjectHelper instance = new MyObjectHelper();
@TestVisible static void setMock(MyObjectHelper mock) instance = mock;
public static Boolean canQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return instance.getCanQueryObject(sObjectType);
// the two method names cannot match or you will get a compile fail
protected virtual Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return sObjectType.getDescribe().isQueryable();
Then in your test, you can have a mock return always true or always false, as you wish.
@IsTest
class MyObjectHelperTests
class HelperMock extends MyObjectHelper
Boolean isQueryable = true;
protected override Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return isQueryable;
@IsTest static void testCannotQuery()
HelperMock mock = new HelperMock();
mock.isQueryable = false;
MyObjectHelper.setMock(mock);
Test.startTest();
Boolean canQuery = MyObjectHelper.canQueryObject(...);
Test.stopTest();
system.assertEquals(false, canQuery, 'Some informative message');
answered Apr 23 at 19:47
Adrian Larson♦Adrian Larson
111k19122260
I typically use a fairly simple pattern and don't bring in a framework. It would look something like the following:
public virtual with sharing class MyObjectHelper
static MyObjectHelper instance = new MyObjectHelper();
@TestVisible static void setMock(MyObjectHelper mock) instance = mock;
public static Boolean canQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return instance.getCanQueryObject(sObjectType);
// the two method names cannot match or you will get a compile fail
protected virtual Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return sObjectType.getDescribe().isQueryable();
Then in your test, you can have a mock return always true or always false, as you wish.
@IsTest
class MyObjectHelperTests
class HelperMock extends MyObjectHelper
Boolean isQueryable = true;
protected override Boolean getCanQueryObject(SObjectType sObjectType)
return isQueryable;
@IsTest static void testCannotQuery()
HelperMock mock = new HelperMock();
mock.isQueryable = false;
MyObjectHelper.setMock(mock);
Test.startTest();
Boolean canQuery = MyObjectHelper.canQueryObject(...);
Test.stopTest();
system.assertEquals(false, canQuery, 'Some informative message');
answered Apr 23 at 19:47
Adrian Larson♦Adrian Larson
111k19122260
answered Apr 23 at 19:47
Adrian Larson♦Adrian Larson
111k19122260
answered Apr 23 at 19:47
Adrian Larson♦Adrian Larson
111k19122260
answered Apr 23 at 19:47
Adrian Larson♦Adrian Larson
111k19122260
111k19122260
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f258841%2fis-there-a-way-to-fake-a-method-response-using-mock-or-stubs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Can you create a user in your test that has no access to the object then runAs that use?
– Eric
Apr 24 at 4:25