Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?Tips for golfing in 05AB1ESplit a word into parts with equal scoresChinese Remainder TheoremMaximise the squared differenceIs it a Mersenne Prime?Your Base to 1-2-3-Tribonacci to Binary back to Your BaseIs this number a factorial?Write numbers as a difference of Nth powersConjugate permutationsAm I a Pillai prime?Passwords Strong Against Bishops
cryptic clue: mammal sounds like relative consumer (8)
My colleague's body is amazing
How old can references or sources in a thesis be?
"which" command doesn't work / path of Safari?
What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?
How is it possible for user's password to be changed after storage was encrypted? (on OS X, Android)
What does "enim et" mean?
How do I create uniquely male characters?
Chess with symmetric move-square
Are white and non-white police officers equally likely to kill black suspects?
If Manufacturer spice model and Datasheet give different values which should I use?
Is it legal to have the "// (c) 2019 John Smith" header in all files when there are hundreds of contributors?
Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?
Showing the closure of a compact subset need not be compact
Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?
Example of a relative pronoun
How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?
Why don't electron-positron collisions release infinite energy?
Could a US political party gain complete control over the government by removing checks & balances?
How can the DM most effectively choose 1 out of an odd number of players to be targeted by an attack or effect?
How do you conduct xenoanthropology after first contact?
Does the radius of the Spirit Guardians spell depend on the size of the caster?
Is it possible to make sharp wind that can cut stuff from afar?
Why is an old chain unsafe?
Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?
Tips for golfing in 05AB1ESplit a word into parts with equal scoresChinese Remainder TheoremMaximise the squared differenceIs it a Mersenne Prime?Your Base to 1-2-3-Tribonacci to Binary back to Your BaseIs this number a factorial?Write numbers as a difference of Nth powersConjugate permutationsAm I a Pillai prime?Passwords Strong Against Bishops
$begingroup$
We define $R_n$ as the list of remainders of the Euclidean division of $n$ by $2$, $3$, $5$ and $7$.
Given an integer $nge0$, you have to figure out if there exists an integer $0<k<210$ such that $R_n+k$ is a permutation of $R_n$.
Examples
The criterion is met for $n=8$, because:
- we have $R_8=(0,2,3,1)$
- for $k=44$, we have $R_n+k=R_52=(0,1,2,3)$, which is a permutation of $R_8$
The criterion is not met for $n=48$, because:
- we have $R_48=(0,0,3,6)$
- the smallest integer $k>0$ such that $R_n+k$ is a permutation of $R_48$ is $k=210$ (leading to $R_258=(0,0,3,6)$ as well)
Rules
- You may either output a truthy value if $k$ exists and a falsy value otherwise, or two distinct and consistent values of your choice.
- This is code-golf.
Hint
Do you really need to compute $k$? Well, maybe. Or maybe not.
Test cases
Some values of $n$ for which $k$ exists:
3, 4, 5, 8, 30, 100, 200, 2019
Some values of $n$ for which $k$ does not exist:
0, 1, 2, 13, 19, 48, 210, 1999
code-golf decision-problem number-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We define $R_n$ as the list of remainders of the Euclidean division of $n$ by $2$, $3$, $5$ and $7$.
Given an integer $nge0$, you have to figure out if there exists an integer $0<k<210$ such that $R_n+k$ is a permutation of $R_n$.
Examples
The criterion is met for $n=8$, because:
- we have $R_8=(0,2,3,1)$
- for $k=44$, we have $R_n+k=R_52=(0,1,2,3)$, which is a permutation of $R_8$
The criterion is not met for $n=48$, because:
- we have $R_48=(0,0,3,6)$
- the smallest integer $k>0$ such that $R_n+k$ is a permutation of $R_48$ is $k=210$ (leading to $R_258=(0,0,3,6)$ as well)
Rules
- You may either output a truthy value if $k$ exists and a falsy value otherwise, or two distinct and consistent values of your choice.
- This is code-golf.
Hint
Do you really need to compute $k$? Well, maybe. Or maybe not.
Test cases
Some values of $n$ for which $k$ exists:
3, 4, 5, 8, 30, 100, 200, 2019
Some values of $n$ for which $k$ does not exist:
0, 1, 2, 13, 19, 48, 210, 1999
code-golf decision-problem number-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We define $R_n$ as the list of remainders of the Euclidean division of $n$ by $2$, $3$, $5$ and $7$.
Given an integer $nge0$, you have to figure out if there exists an integer $0<k<210$ such that $R_n+k$ is a permutation of $R_n$.
Examples
The criterion is met for $n=8$, because:
- we have $R_8=(0,2,3,1)$
- for $k=44$, we have $R_n+k=R_52=(0,1,2,3)$, which is a permutation of $R_8$
The criterion is not met for $n=48$, because:
- we have $R_48=(0,0,3,6)$
- the smallest integer $k>0$ such that $R_n+k$ is a permutation of $R_48$ is $k=210$ (leading to $R_258=(0,0,3,6)$ as well)
Rules
- You may either output a truthy value if $k$ exists and a falsy value otherwise, or two distinct and consistent values of your choice.
- This is code-golf.
Hint
Do you really need to compute $k$? Well, maybe. Or maybe not.
Test cases
Some values of $n$ for which $k$ exists:
3, 4, 5, 8, 30, 100, 200, 2019
Some values of $n$ for which $k$ does not exist:
0, 1, 2, 13, 19, 48, 210, 1999
code-golf decision-problem number-theory
$endgroup$
We define $R_n$ as the list of remainders of the Euclidean division of $n$ by $2$, $3$, $5$ and $7$.
Given an integer $nge0$, you have to figure out if there exists an integer $0<k<210$ such that $R_n+k$ is a permutation of $R_n$.
Examples
The criterion is met for $n=8$, because:
- we have $R_8=(0,2,3,1)$
- for $k=44$, we have $R_n+k=R_52=(0,1,2,3)$, which is a permutation of $R_8$
The criterion is not met for $n=48$, because:
- we have $R_48=(0,0,3,6)$
- the smallest integer $k>0$ such that $R_n+k$ is a permutation of $R_48$ is $k=210$ (leading to $R_258=(0,0,3,6)$ as well)
Rules
- You may either output a truthy value if $k$ exists and a falsy value otherwise, or two distinct and consistent values of your choice.
- This is code-golf.
Hint
Do you really need to compute $k$? Well, maybe. Or maybe not.
Test cases
Some values of $n$ for which $k$ exists:
3, 4, 5, 8, 30, 100, 200, 2019
Some values of $n$ for which $k$ does not exist:
0, 1, 2, 13, 19, 48, 210, 1999
code-golf decision-problem number-theory
code-golf decision-problem number-theory
asked Apr 4 at 15:36
ArnauldArnauld
80.6k797333
80.6k797333
add a comment |
add a comment |
16 Answers
16
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
R, 63 59 bytes
s=scan()%%c(2,3,5,7);i=which(s<c(0,2,3,5));any(s[i]-s[i-1])
Try it online!
-4 bytes thanks to Giuseppe
(The explanation contains a spoiler as to how to solve the problem without computing $k$.)
Explanation:
Let $s$ be the list of remainders. Note the constraint that s[1]<2, s[2]<3, s[3]<5 and s[4]<7. By the Chinese Remainder Theorem, there exists a $k$ iff there is a permutation of $s$, distinct from $s$, which verifies the constraint. In practice, this will be verified if one of the following conditions is verified:
- s[2]<2 and s[2]!=s[1]
- s[3]<3 and s[3]!=s[2]
- s[4]<5 and s[4]!=s[3]
The code can probably be golfed further.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could you explain why the permutation is necessarily distinct from $s$?
$endgroup$
– dfeuer
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@dfeuer It is a consequence of the Chinese Remainder Theorem; I added a link. If two integers have the same remainders modulo 2, 3, 5 and 7 (without a permutation), then the two integers are equal modulo 2*3*5*7=210.
$endgroup$
– Robin Ryder
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Haskell, 69 bytes
Based on the Chinese remainder theorem
m=[2,3,5,7]
f x|s<-mod x<$>m=or[m!!a>b|a<-[0..2],b<-drop a s,s!!a/=b]
Try it online!
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
Actually, my working title for this challenge was "Do I have a Chinese twin?" :)
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Perl 6, 64 61 59 43 bytes
map($!=(*X%2,3,5,7).Bag,^209+$_+1)∋.&$!
Try it online!
-16 thanks to @Jo King
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Python 2, 41 bytes
lambda n:n%5!=n%7<5or n%3!=n%5<3or-~n%6/4
Try it online!
Uses the same characterization as Robin Ryder. The check n%2!=n%3<2
is shortened to -~n%6/4
. Writing out the three conditions turned out shorter than writing a general one:
46 bytes
lambda n:any(n%p!=n%(p+1|1)<p for p in[2,3,5])
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Haskell, 47 bytes
g.mod
g r|let p?q=r p/=r q&&r q<p=2?3||3?5||5?7
Try it online!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Can you explain?
$endgroup$
– dfeuer
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@dfeuer It's using Robin Ryder's method.
$endgroup$
– Ørjan Johansen
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 125 42 38 36 bytes
n=>n%7<5&5<n%35|n%5<3&3<n%15|-~n%6>3
Direct port of @xnor's answer, which is based off of @RobinRyder's solution.
Saved 4 bytes thanks to @Ørjan Johansen!
Saved 2 more thanks to @Arnauld!
Try it online!
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I found a variation that only ties for xnor's languages but helps for this: 38 bytes
$endgroup$
– Ørjan Johansen
Apr 5 at 6:04
1
$begingroup$
Isn't-~n%6/4>0
just-~n%6>3
?
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
yesterday
$begingroup$
BTW, this is a JavaScript polyglot.
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
22 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 67 bytes
!FreeQ[Sort/@Table[R[#+k],k,209],Sort@R@#]&
R@n_:=n~Mod~2,3,5,7
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Ruby, 54 bytes
->n[2,3,5,7].each_cons(2).any?n%l!=n%h&&n%h<l
Try it online!
Uses Robin Ryder's clever solution.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Java (JDK), 38 bytes
n->n%7<5&5<n%35|n%5<3&3<n%15|-~n%6/4>0
Try it online!
Credits
- Port of xnor's solution, improved by Ørjan Johansen.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
R, 72 bytes
n=scan();b=c(2,3,5,7);for(i in n+1:209)F=F|all(sort(n%%b)==sort(i%%b));F
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Jelly, 15 bytes
8ÆR©PḶ+%Ṣ¥€®ċḢ$
Try it online!
I’m sure there’s a golfier answer. I’ve interpreted a truthy value as being anything that isn’t zero, so here it’s the number of possible values of k. If it needs to be two distinct values that costs me a further byte.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
All good regarding truthy vs falsey. Using the meta agreed definition of truthy and falsey (effectively "what does the language's if-else construct do if there is one) zero is falsey and non-zeros are truthy (?
is the if-else construct in Jelly; for some languages it's a harder question).
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Allan
Apr 4 at 18:08
$begingroup$
Oh, and you could get distinct values for no cost withḢe$
if you wanted :)
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Allan
Apr 4 at 18:11
$begingroup$
@JonathanAllan yes of course, thanks. :)
$endgroup$
– Nick Kennedy
Apr 4 at 18:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
PHP, 81 78 72 bytes
while($y<3)if($argn%($u='235'[$y])!=($b=$argn%'357'[$y++])&$b<$u)die(T);
A riff on @Robin Ryder's answer. Input is via STDIN
, output is 'T'
if truthy, and empty ''
if falsy.
$ echo 3|php -nF euc.php
T
$ echo 5|php -nF euc.php
T
$ echo 2019|php -nF euc.php
T
$ echo 0|php -nF euc.php
$ echo 2|php -nF euc.php
$ echo 1999|php -nF euc.php
Try it online!
Or 73 bytes with 1
or 0
response
while($y<3)$r|=$argn%($u='235'[$y])!=($b=$argn%'357'[$y++])&$b<$u;echo$r;
$ echo 2019|php -nF euc.php
1
$ echo 1999|php -nF euc.php
0
Try it online (all test cases)!
Original answer, 133 127 bytes
function($n)while(++$k<210)if(($r=function($n)foreach([2,3,5,7]as$d)$o[]=$n%$d;sort($o);return$o;)($n+$k)==$r($n))return 1;
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Python 3, 69 bytes
lambda x:int('4LR2991ODO5GS2974QWH22YTLL3E3I6TDADQG87I0',36)&1<<x%210
Try it online!
Hardcoded
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
05AB1E, 16 bytes
Ƶ.L+ε‚ε4Åp%Ë}à
Try it online or verify all test cases.
Explanation:
Ƶ.L # Create a list in the range [1,209] (which is k)
+ # Add the (implicit) input to each (which is n+k)
ε # Map each value to:
‚ # Pair it with the (implicit) input
ε # Map both to:
4Åp # Get the first 4 primes: [2,3,5,7]
% # Modulo the current number by each of these four (now we have R_n and R_n+k)
# Sort the list
Ë # After the inner map: check if both sorted lists are equal
}à # After the outer map: check if any are truthy by taking the maximum
# (which is output implicitly as result)
See this 05AB1E tip of mine (section How to compress large integers?) to understand why Ƶ.
is 209
.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
J, 40 bytes
1 e.(>:+i.@209)-:&(/:~)&(2 3 5 7&|"1 0)]
Try it online!
Brute force...
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 56 bytes
Or@@(Min[s-#]>0&/@Rest@Permutations@Mod[#,s=2,3,5,7])&
Try it online!
Finds all non-identity permutations of the remainders of the input modulo 2, 3, 5, 7, and checks if any of them are below 2,3,5,7
in each coordinate. Note that Or@@
is False
.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "200"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f182669%2fdo-i-have-a-twin-with-permutated-remainders%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
16 Answers
16
active
oldest
votes
16 Answers
16
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
R, 63 59 bytes
s=scan()%%c(2,3,5,7);i=which(s<c(0,2,3,5));any(s[i]-s[i-1])
Try it online!
-4 bytes thanks to Giuseppe
(The explanation contains a spoiler as to how to solve the problem without computing $k$.)
Explanation:
Let $s$ be the list of remainders. Note the constraint that s[1]<2, s[2]<3, s[3]<5 and s[4]<7. By the Chinese Remainder Theorem, there exists a $k$ iff there is a permutation of $s$, distinct from $s$, which verifies the constraint. In practice, this will be verified if one of the following conditions is verified:
- s[2]<2 and s[2]!=s[1]
- s[3]<3 and s[3]!=s[2]
- s[4]<5 and s[4]!=s[3]
The code can probably be golfed further.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could you explain why the permutation is necessarily distinct from $s$?
$endgroup$
– dfeuer
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@dfeuer It is a consequence of the Chinese Remainder Theorem; I added a link. If two integers have the same remainders modulo 2, 3, 5 and 7 (without a permutation), then the two integers are equal modulo 2*3*5*7=210.
$endgroup$
– Robin Ryder
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
R, 63 59 bytes
s=scan()%%c(2,3,5,7);i=which(s<c(0,2,3,5));any(s[i]-s[i-1])
Try it online!
-4 bytes thanks to Giuseppe
(The explanation contains a spoiler as to how to solve the problem without computing $k$.)
Explanation:
Let $s$ be the list of remainders. Note the constraint that s[1]<2, s[2]<3, s[3]<5 and s[4]<7. By the Chinese Remainder Theorem, there exists a $k$ iff there is a permutation of $s$, distinct from $s$, which verifies the constraint. In practice, this will be verified if one of the following conditions is verified:
- s[2]<2 and s[2]!=s[1]
- s[3]<3 and s[3]!=s[2]
- s[4]<5 and s[4]!=s[3]
The code can probably be golfed further.
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could you explain why the permutation is necessarily distinct from $s$?
$endgroup$
– dfeuer
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@dfeuer It is a consequence of the Chinese Remainder Theorem; I added a link. If two integers have the same remainders modulo 2, 3, 5 and 7 (without a permutation), then the two integers are equal modulo 2*3*5*7=210.
$endgroup$
– Robin Ryder
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
R, 63 59 bytes
s=scan()%%c(2,3,5,7);i=which(s<c(0,2,3,5));any(s[i]-s[i-1])
Try it online!
-4 bytes thanks to Giuseppe
(The explanation contains a spoiler as to how to solve the problem without computing $k$.)
Explanation:
Let $s$ be the list of remainders. Note the constraint that s[1]<2, s[2]<3, s[3]<5 and s[4]<7. By the Chinese Remainder Theorem, there exists a $k$ iff there is a permutation of $s$, distinct from $s$, which verifies the constraint. In practice, this will be verified if one of the following conditions is verified:
- s[2]<2 and s[2]!=s[1]
- s[3]<3 and s[3]!=s[2]
- s[4]<5 and s[4]!=s[3]
The code can probably be golfed further.
New contributor
$endgroup$
R, 63 59 bytes
s=scan()%%c(2,3,5,7);i=which(s<c(0,2,3,5));any(s[i]-s[i-1])
Try it online!
-4 bytes thanks to Giuseppe
(The explanation contains a spoiler as to how to solve the problem without computing $k$.)
Explanation:
Let $s$ be the list of remainders. Note the constraint that s[1]<2, s[2]<3, s[3]<5 and s[4]<7. By the Chinese Remainder Theorem, there exists a $k$ iff there is a permutation of $s$, distinct from $s$, which verifies the constraint. In practice, this will be verified if one of the following conditions is verified:
- s[2]<2 and s[2]!=s[1]
- s[3]<3 and s[3]!=s[2]
- s[4]<5 and s[4]!=s[3]
The code can probably be golfed further.
New contributor
edited yesterday
New contributor
answered Apr 4 at 17:00
Robin RyderRobin Ryder
5417
5417
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
Could you explain why the permutation is necessarily distinct from $s$?
$endgroup$
– dfeuer
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@dfeuer It is a consequence of the Chinese Remainder Theorem; I added a link. If two integers have the same remainders modulo 2, 3, 5 and 7 (without a permutation), then the two integers are equal modulo 2*3*5*7=210.
$endgroup$
– Robin Ryder
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Could you explain why the permutation is necessarily distinct from $s$?
$endgroup$
– dfeuer
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@dfeuer It is a consequence of the Chinese Remainder Theorem; I added a link. If two integers have the same remainders modulo 2, 3, 5 and 7 (without a permutation), then the two integers are equal modulo 2*3*5*7=210.
$endgroup$
– Robin Ryder
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Could you explain why the permutation is necessarily distinct from $s$?
$endgroup$
– dfeuer
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Could you explain why the permutation is necessarily distinct from $s$?
$endgroup$
– dfeuer
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@dfeuer It is a consequence of the Chinese Remainder Theorem; I added a link. If two integers have the same remainders modulo 2, 3, 5 and 7 (without a permutation), then the two integers are equal modulo 2*3*5*7=210.
$endgroup$
– Robin Ryder
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@dfeuer It is a consequence of the Chinese Remainder Theorem; I added a link. If two integers have the same remainders modulo 2, 3, 5 and 7 (without a permutation), then the two integers are equal modulo 2*3*5*7=210.
$endgroup$
– Robin Ryder
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Haskell, 69 bytes
Based on the Chinese remainder theorem
m=[2,3,5,7]
f x|s<-mod x<$>m=or[m!!a>b|a<-[0..2],b<-drop a s,s!!a/=b]
Try it online!
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
Actually, my working title for this challenge was "Do I have a Chinese twin?" :)
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Haskell, 69 bytes
Based on the Chinese remainder theorem
m=[2,3,5,7]
f x|s<-mod x<$>m=or[m!!a>b|a<-[0..2],b<-drop a s,s!!a/=b]
Try it online!
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
Actually, my working title for this challenge was "Do I have a Chinese twin?" :)
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Haskell, 69 bytes
Based on the Chinese remainder theorem
m=[2,3,5,7]
f x|s<-mod x<$>m=or[m!!a>b|a<-[0..2],b<-drop a s,s!!a/=b]
Try it online!
$endgroup$
Haskell, 69 bytes
Based on the Chinese remainder theorem
m=[2,3,5,7]
f x|s<-mod x<$>m=or[m!!a>b|a<-[0..2],b<-drop a s,s!!a/=b]
Try it online!
answered Apr 4 at 16:45
H.PWizH.PWiz
10.3k21351
10.3k21351
4
$begingroup$
Actually, my working title for this challenge was "Do I have a Chinese twin?" :)
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
2 days ago
add a comment |
4
$begingroup$
Actually, my working title for this challenge was "Do I have a Chinese twin?" :)
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
2 days ago
4
4
$begingroup$
Actually, my working title for this challenge was "Do I have a Chinese twin?" :)
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Actually, my working title for this challenge was "Do I have a Chinese twin?" :)
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Perl 6, 64 61 59 43 bytes
map($!=(*X%2,3,5,7).Bag,^209+$_+1)∋.&$!
Try it online!
-16 thanks to @Jo King
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Perl 6, 64 61 59 43 bytes
map($!=(*X%2,3,5,7).Bag,^209+$_+1)∋.&$!
Try it online!
-16 thanks to @Jo King
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Perl 6, 64 61 59 43 bytes
map($!=(*X%2,3,5,7).Bag,^209+$_+1)∋.&$!
Try it online!
-16 thanks to @Jo King
$endgroup$
Perl 6, 64 61 59 43 bytes
map($!=(*X%2,3,5,7).Bag,^209+$_+1)∋.&$!
Try it online!
-16 thanks to @Jo King
edited 2 days ago
answered Apr 4 at 16:20
VenVen
2,55511223
2,55511223
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Python 2, 41 bytes
lambda n:n%5!=n%7<5or n%3!=n%5<3or-~n%6/4
Try it online!
Uses the same characterization as Robin Ryder. The check n%2!=n%3<2
is shortened to -~n%6/4
. Writing out the three conditions turned out shorter than writing a general one:
46 bytes
lambda n:any(n%p!=n%(p+1|1)<p for p in[2,3,5])
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Python 2, 41 bytes
lambda n:n%5!=n%7<5or n%3!=n%5<3or-~n%6/4
Try it online!
Uses the same characterization as Robin Ryder. The check n%2!=n%3<2
is shortened to -~n%6/4
. Writing out the three conditions turned out shorter than writing a general one:
46 bytes
lambda n:any(n%p!=n%(p+1|1)<p for p in[2,3,5])
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Python 2, 41 bytes
lambda n:n%5!=n%7<5or n%3!=n%5<3or-~n%6/4
Try it online!
Uses the same characterization as Robin Ryder. The check n%2!=n%3<2
is shortened to -~n%6/4
. Writing out the three conditions turned out shorter than writing a general one:
46 bytes
lambda n:any(n%p!=n%(p+1|1)<p for p in[2,3,5])
Try it online!
$endgroup$
Python 2, 41 bytes
lambda n:n%5!=n%7<5or n%3!=n%5<3or-~n%6/4
Try it online!
Uses the same characterization as Robin Ryder. The check n%2!=n%3<2
is shortened to -~n%6/4
. Writing out the three conditions turned out shorter than writing a general one:
46 bytes
lambda n:any(n%p!=n%(p+1|1)<p for p in[2,3,5])
Try it online!
edited Apr 5 at 4:16
answered Apr 5 at 0:34
xnorxnor
93.4k18190448
93.4k18190448
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Haskell, 47 bytes
g.mod
g r|let p?q=r p/=r q&&r q<p=2?3||3?5||5?7
Try it online!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Can you explain?
$endgroup$
– dfeuer
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@dfeuer It's using Robin Ryder's method.
$endgroup$
– Ørjan Johansen
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Haskell, 47 bytes
g.mod
g r|let p?q=r p/=r q&&r q<p=2?3||3?5||5?7
Try it online!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Can you explain?
$endgroup$
– dfeuer
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@dfeuer It's using Robin Ryder's method.
$endgroup$
– Ørjan Johansen
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Haskell, 47 bytes
g.mod
g r|let p?q=r p/=r q&&r q<p=2?3||3?5||5?7
Try it online!
$endgroup$
Haskell, 47 bytes
g.mod
g r|let p?q=r p/=r q&&r q<p=2?3||3?5||5?7
Try it online!
edited Apr 5 at 5:27
answered Apr 5 at 5:19
xnorxnor
93.4k18190448
93.4k18190448
$begingroup$
Can you explain?
$endgroup$
– dfeuer
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@dfeuer It's using Robin Ryder's method.
$endgroup$
– Ørjan Johansen
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can you explain?
$endgroup$
– dfeuer
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@dfeuer It's using Robin Ryder's method.
$endgroup$
– Ørjan Johansen
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Can you explain?
$endgroup$
– dfeuer
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Can you explain?
$endgroup$
– dfeuer
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@dfeuer It's using Robin Ryder's method.
$endgroup$
– Ørjan Johansen
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@dfeuer It's using Robin Ryder's method.
$endgroup$
– Ørjan Johansen
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 125 42 38 36 bytes
n=>n%7<5&5<n%35|n%5<3&3<n%15|-~n%6>3
Direct port of @xnor's answer, which is based off of @RobinRyder's solution.
Saved 4 bytes thanks to @Ørjan Johansen!
Saved 2 more thanks to @Arnauld!
Try it online!
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I found a variation that only ties for xnor's languages but helps for this: 38 bytes
$endgroup$
– Ørjan Johansen
Apr 5 at 6:04
1
$begingroup$
Isn't-~n%6/4>0
just-~n%6>3
?
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
yesterday
$begingroup$
BTW, this is a JavaScript polyglot.
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
22 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 125 42 38 36 bytes
n=>n%7<5&5<n%35|n%5<3&3<n%15|-~n%6>3
Direct port of @xnor's answer, which is based off of @RobinRyder's solution.
Saved 4 bytes thanks to @Ørjan Johansen!
Saved 2 more thanks to @Arnauld!
Try it online!
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I found a variation that only ties for xnor's languages but helps for this: 38 bytes
$endgroup$
– Ørjan Johansen
Apr 5 at 6:04
1
$begingroup$
Isn't-~n%6/4>0
just-~n%6>3
?
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
yesterday
$begingroup$
BTW, this is a JavaScript polyglot.
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
22 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 125 42 38 36 bytes
n=>n%7<5&5<n%35|n%5<3&3<n%15|-~n%6>3
Direct port of @xnor's answer, which is based off of @RobinRyder's solution.
Saved 4 bytes thanks to @Ørjan Johansen!
Saved 2 more thanks to @Arnauld!
Try it online!
$endgroup$
C# (Visual C# Interactive Compiler), 125 42 38 36 bytes
n=>n%7<5&5<n%35|n%5<3&3<n%15|-~n%6>3
Direct port of @xnor's answer, which is based off of @RobinRyder's solution.
Saved 4 bytes thanks to @Ørjan Johansen!
Saved 2 more thanks to @Arnauld!
Try it online!
edited yesterday
answered Apr 4 at 16:33
Embodiment of IgnoranceEmbodiment of Ignorance
2,838127
2,838127
1
$begingroup$
I found a variation that only ties for xnor's languages but helps for this: 38 bytes
$endgroup$
– Ørjan Johansen
Apr 5 at 6:04
1
$begingroup$
Isn't-~n%6/4>0
just-~n%6>3
?
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
yesterday
$begingroup$
BTW, this is a JavaScript polyglot.
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
22 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
I found a variation that only ties for xnor's languages but helps for this: 38 bytes
$endgroup$
– Ørjan Johansen
Apr 5 at 6:04
1
$begingroup$
Isn't-~n%6/4>0
just-~n%6>3
?
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
yesterday
$begingroup$
BTW, this is a JavaScript polyglot.
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
22 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I found a variation that only ties for xnor's languages but helps for this: 38 bytes
$endgroup$
– Ørjan Johansen
Apr 5 at 6:04
$begingroup$
I found a variation that only ties for xnor's languages but helps for this: 38 bytes
$endgroup$
– Ørjan Johansen
Apr 5 at 6:04
1
1
$begingroup$
Isn't
-~n%6/4>0
just -~n%6>3
?$endgroup$
– Arnauld
yesterday
$begingroup$
Isn't
-~n%6/4>0
just -~n%6>3
?$endgroup$
– Arnauld
yesterday
$begingroup$
BTW, this is a JavaScript polyglot.
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
22 hours ago
$begingroup$
BTW, this is a JavaScript polyglot.
$endgroup$
– Arnauld
22 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 67 bytes
!FreeQ[Sort/@Table[R[#+k],k,209],Sort@R@#]&
R@n_:=n~Mod~2,3,5,7
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 67 bytes
!FreeQ[Sort/@Table[R[#+k],k,209],Sort@R@#]&
R@n_:=n~Mod~2,3,5,7
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 67 bytes
!FreeQ[Sort/@Table[R[#+k],k,209],Sort@R@#]&
R@n_:=n~Mod~2,3,5,7
Try it online!
$endgroup$
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 67 bytes
!FreeQ[Sort/@Table[R[#+k],k,209],Sort@R@#]&
R@n_:=n~Mod~2,3,5,7
Try it online!
edited Apr 4 at 16:00
answered Apr 4 at 15:53
J42161217J42161217
13.8k21253
13.8k21253
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Ruby, 54 bytes
->n[2,3,5,7].each_cons(2).any?n%l!=n%h&&n%h<l
Try it online!
Uses Robin Ryder's clever solution.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Ruby, 54 bytes
->n[2,3,5,7].each_cons(2).any?n%l!=n%h&&n%h<l
Try it online!
Uses Robin Ryder's clever solution.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Ruby, 54 bytes
->n[2,3,5,7].each_cons(2).any?n%l!=n%h&&n%h<l
Try it online!
Uses Robin Ryder's clever solution.
$endgroup$
Ruby, 54 bytes
->n[2,3,5,7].each_cons(2).any?n%l!=n%h&&n%h<l
Try it online!
Uses Robin Ryder's clever solution.
answered Apr 4 at 18:59
histocrathistocrat
19.2k43173
19.2k43173
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Java (JDK), 38 bytes
n->n%7<5&5<n%35|n%5<3&3<n%15|-~n%6/4>0
Try it online!
Credits
- Port of xnor's solution, improved by Ørjan Johansen.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Java (JDK), 38 bytes
n->n%7<5&5<n%35|n%5<3&3<n%15|-~n%6/4>0
Try it online!
Credits
- Port of xnor's solution, improved by Ørjan Johansen.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Java (JDK), 38 bytes
n->n%7<5&5<n%35|n%5<3&3<n%15|-~n%6/4>0
Try it online!
Credits
- Port of xnor's solution, improved by Ørjan Johansen.
$endgroup$
Java (JDK), 38 bytes
n->n%7<5&5<n%35|n%5<3&3<n%15|-~n%6/4>0
Try it online!
Credits
- Port of xnor's solution, improved by Ørjan Johansen.
answered 2 days ago
Olivier GrégoireOlivier Grégoire
9,39511944
9,39511944
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
R, 72 bytes
n=scan();b=c(2,3,5,7);for(i in n+1:209)F=F|all(sort(n%%b)==sort(i%%b));F
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
R, 72 bytes
n=scan();b=c(2,3,5,7);for(i in n+1:209)F=F|all(sort(n%%b)==sort(i%%b));F
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
R, 72 bytes
n=scan();b=c(2,3,5,7);for(i in n+1:209)F=F|all(sort(n%%b)==sort(i%%b));F
Try it online!
$endgroup$
R, 72 bytes
n=scan();b=c(2,3,5,7);for(i in n+1:209)F=F|all(sort(n%%b)==sort(i%%b));F
Try it online!
answered Apr 4 at 16:42
Aaron HaymanAaron Hayman
3516
3516
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Jelly, 15 bytes
8ÆR©PḶ+%Ṣ¥€®ċḢ$
Try it online!
I’m sure there’s a golfier answer. I’ve interpreted a truthy value as being anything that isn’t zero, so here it’s the number of possible values of k. If it needs to be two distinct values that costs me a further byte.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
All good regarding truthy vs falsey. Using the meta agreed definition of truthy and falsey (effectively "what does the language's if-else construct do if there is one) zero is falsey and non-zeros are truthy (?
is the if-else construct in Jelly; for some languages it's a harder question).
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Allan
Apr 4 at 18:08
$begingroup$
Oh, and you could get distinct values for no cost withḢe$
if you wanted :)
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Allan
Apr 4 at 18:11
$begingroup$
@JonathanAllan yes of course, thanks. :)
$endgroup$
– Nick Kennedy
Apr 4 at 18:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Jelly, 15 bytes
8ÆR©PḶ+%Ṣ¥€®ċḢ$
Try it online!
I’m sure there’s a golfier answer. I’ve interpreted a truthy value as being anything that isn’t zero, so here it’s the number of possible values of k. If it needs to be two distinct values that costs me a further byte.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
All good regarding truthy vs falsey. Using the meta agreed definition of truthy and falsey (effectively "what does the language's if-else construct do if there is one) zero is falsey and non-zeros are truthy (?
is the if-else construct in Jelly; for some languages it's a harder question).
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Allan
Apr 4 at 18:08
$begingroup$
Oh, and you could get distinct values for no cost withḢe$
if you wanted :)
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Allan
Apr 4 at 18:11
$begingroup$
@JonathanAllan yes of course, thanks. :)
$endgroup$
– Nick Kennedy
Apr 4 at 18:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Jelly, 15 bytes
8ÆR©PḶ+%Ṣ¥€®ċḢ$
Try it online!
I’m sure there’s a golfier answer. I’ve interpreted a truthy value as being anything that isn’t zero, so here it’s the number of possible values of k. If it needs to be two distinct values that costs me a further byte.
$endgroup$
Jelly, 15 bytes
8ÆR©PḶ+%Ṣ¥€®ċḢ$
Try it online!
I’m sure there’s a golfier answer. I’ve interpreted a truthy value as being anything that isn’t zero, so here it’s the number of possible values of k. If it needs to be two distinct values that costs me a further byte.
answered Apr 4 at 17:59
Nick KennedyNick Kennedy
1,34649
1,34649
1
$begingroup$
All good regarding truthy vs falsey. Using the meta agreed definition of truthy and falsey (effectively "what does the language's if-else construct do if there is one) zero is falsey and non-zeros are truthy (?
is the if-else construct in Jelly; for some languages it's a harder question).
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Allan
Apr 4 at 18:08
$begingroup$
Oh, and you could get distinct values for no cost withḢe$
if you wanted :)
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Allan
Apr 4 at 18:11
$begingroup$
@JonathanAllan yes of course, thanks. :)
$endgroup$
– Nick Kennedy
Apr 4 at 18:12
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
All good regarding truthy vs falsey. Using the meta agreed definition of truthy and falsey (effectively "what does the language's if-else construct do if there is one) zero is falsey and non-zeros are truthy (?
is the if-else construct in Jelly; for some languages it's a harder question).
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Allan
Apr 4 at 18:08
$begingroup$
Oh, and you could get distinct values for no cost withḢe$
if you wanted :)
$endgroup$
– Jonathan Allan
Apr 4 at 18:11
$begingroup$
@JonathanAllan yes of course, thanks. :)
$endgroup$
– Nick Kennedy
Apr 4 at 18:12
1
1
$begingroup$
All good regarding truthy vs falsey. Using the meta agreed definition of truthy and falsey (effectively "what does the language's if-else construct do if there is one) zero is falsey and non-zeros are truthy (
?
is the if-else construct in Jelly; for some languages it's a harder question).$endgroup$
– Jonathan Allan
Apr 4 at 18:08
$begingroup$
All good regarding truthy vs falsey. Using the meta agreed definition of truthy and falsey (effectively "what does the language's if-else construct do if there is one) zero is falsey and non-zeros are truthy (
?
is the if-else construct in Jelly; for some languages it's a harder question).$endgroup$
– Jonathan Allan
Apr 4 at 18:08
$begingroup$
Oh, and you could get distinct values for no cost with
Ḣe$
if you wanted :)$endgroup$
– Jonathan Allan
Apr 4 at 18:11
$begingroup$
Oh, and you could get distinct values for no cost with
Ḣe$
if you wanted :)$endgroup$
– Jonathan Allan
Apr 4 at 18:11
$begingroup$
@JonathanAllan yes of course, thanks. :)
$endgroup$
– Nick Kennedy
Apr 4 at 18:12
$begingroup$
@JonathanAllan yes of course, thanks. :)
$endgroup$
– Nick Kennedy
Apr 4 at 18:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
PHP, 81 78 72 bytes
while($y<3)if($argn%($u='235'[$y])!=($b=$argn%'357'[$y++])&$b<$u)die(T);
A riff on @Robin Ryder's answer. Input is via STDIN
, output is 'T'
if truthy, and empty ''
if falsy.
$ echo 3|php -nF euc.php
T
$ echo 5|php -nF euc.php
T
$ echo 2019|php -nF euc.php
T
$ echo 0|php -nF euc.php
$ echo 2|php -nF euc.php
$ echo 1999|php -nF euc.php
Try it online!
Or 73 bytes with 1
or 0
response
while($y<3)$r|=$argn%($u='235'[$y])!=($b=$argn%'357'[$y++])&$b<$u;echo$r;
$ echo 2019|php -nF euc.php
1
$ echo 1999|php -nF euc.php
0
Try it online (all test cases)!
Original answer, 133 127 bytes
function($n)while(++$k<210)if(($r=function($n)foreach([2,3,5,7]as$d)$o[]=$n%$d;sort($o);return$o;)($n+$k)==$r($n))return 1;
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
PHP, 81 78 72 bytes
while($y<3)if($argn%($u='235'[$y])!=($b=$argn%'357'[$y++])&$b<$u)die(T);
A riff on @Robin Ryder's answer. Input is via STDIN
, output is 'T'
if truthy, and empty ''
if falsy.
$ echo 3|php -nF euc.php
T
$ echo 5|php -nF euc.php
T
$ echo 2019|php -nF euc.php
T
$ echo 0|php -nF euc.php
$ echo 2|php -nF euc.php
$ echo 1999|php -nF euc.php
Try it online!
Or 73 bytes with 1
or 0
response
while($y<3)$r|=$argn%($u='235'[$y])!=($b=$argn%'357'[$y++])&$b<$u;echo$r;
$ echo 2019|php -nF euc.php
1
$ echo 1999|php -nF euc.php
0
Try it online (all test cases)!
Original answer, 133 127 bytes
function($n)while(++$k<210)if(($r=function($n)foreach([2,3,5,7]as$d)$o[]=$n%$d;sort($o);return$o;)($n+$k)==$r($n))return 1;
Try it online!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
PHP, 81 78 72 bytes
while($y<3)if($argn%($u='235'[$y])!=($b=$argn%'357'[$y++])&$b<$u)die(T);
A riff on @Robin Ryder's answer. Input is via STDIN
, output is 'T'
if truthy, and empty ''
if falsy.
$ echo 3|php -nF euc.php
T
$ echo 5|php -nF euc.php
T
$ echo 2019|php -nF euc.php
T
$ echo 0|php -nF euc.php
$ echo 2|php -nF euc.php
$ echo 1999|php -nF euc.php
Try it online!
Or 73 bytes with 1
or 0
response
while($y<3)$r|=$argn%($u='235'[$y])!=($b=$argn%'357'[$y++])&$b<$u;echo$r;
$ echo 2019|php -nF euc.php
1
$ echo 1999|php -nF euc.php
0
Try it online (all test cases)!
Original answer, 133 127 bytes
function($n)while(++$k<210)if(($r=function($n)foreach([2,3,5,7]as$d)$o[]=$n%$d;sort($o);return$o;)($n+$k)==$r($n))return 1;
Try it online!
$endgroup$
PHP, 81 78 72 bytes
while($y<3)if($argn%($u='235'[$y])!=($b=$argn%'357'[$y++])&$b<$u)die(T);
A riff on @Robin Ryder's answer. Input is via STDIN
, output is 'T'
if truthy, and empty ''
if falsy.
$ echo 3|php -nF euc.php
T
$ echo 5|php -nF euc.php
T
$ echo 2019|php -nF euc.php
T
$ echo 0|php -nF euc.php
$ echo 2|php -nF euc.php
$ echo 1999|php -nF euc.php
Try it online!
Or 73 bytes with 1
or 0
response
while($y<3)$r|=$argn%($u='235'[$y])!=($b=$argn%'357'[$y++])&$b<$u;echo$r;
$ echo 2019|php -nF euc.php
1
$ echo 1999|php -nF euc.php
0
Try it online (all test cases)!
Original answer, 133 127 bytes
function($n)while(++$k<210)if(($r=function($n)foreach([2,3,5,7]as$d)$o[]=$n%$d;sort($o);return$o;)($n+$k)==$r($n))return 1;
Try it online!
edited Apr 4 at 19:16
answered Apr 4 at 16:01
gwaughgwaugh
2,0281517
2,0281517
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Python 3, 69 bytes
lambda x:int('4LR2991ODO5GS2974QWH22YTLL3E3I6TDADQG87I0',36)&1<<x%210
Try it online!
Hardcoded
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Python 3, 69 bytes
lambda x:int('4LR2991ODO5GS2974QWH22YTLL3E3I6TDADQG87I0',36)&1<<x%210
Try it online!
Hardcoded
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Python 3, 69 bytes
lambda x:int('4LR2991ODO5GS2974QWH22YTLL3E3I6TDADQG87I0',36)&1<<x%210
Try it online!
Hardcoded
$endgroup$
Python 3, 69 bytes
lambda x:int('4LR2991ODO5GS2974QWH22YTLL3E3I6TDADQG87I0',36)&1<<x%210
Try it online!
Hardcoded
answered Apr 4 at 22:17
attinatattinat
4797
4797
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
05AB1E, 16 bytes
Ƶ.L+ε‚ε4Åp%Ë}à
Try it online or verify all test cases.
Explanation:
Ƶ.L # Create a list in the range [1,209] (which is k)
+ # Add the (implicit) input to each (which is n+k)
ε # Map each value to:
‚ # Pair it with the (implicit) input
ε # Map both to:
4Åp # Get the first 4 primes: [2,3,5,7]
% # Modulo the current number by each of these four (now we have R_n and R_n+k)
# Sort the list
Ë # After the inner map: check if both sorted lists are equal
}à # After the outer map: check if any are truthy by taking the maximum
# (which is output implicitly as result)
See this 05AB1E tip of mine (section How to compress large integers?) to understand why Ƶ.
is 209
.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
05AB1E, 16 bytes
Ƶ.L+ε‚ε4Åp%Ë}à
Try it online or verify all test cases.
Explanation:
Ƶ.L # Create a list in the range [1,209] (which is k)
+ # Add the (implicit) input to each (which is n+k)
ε # Map each value to:
‚ # Pair it with the (implicit) input
ε # Map both to:
4Åp # Get the first 4 primes: [2,3,5,7]
% # Modulo the current number by each of these four (now we have R_n and R_n+k)
# Sort the list
Ë # After the inner map: check if both sorted lists are equal
}à # After the outer map: check if any are truthy by taking the maximum
# (which is output implicitly as result)
See this 05AB1E tip of mine (section How to compress large integers?) to understand why Ƶ.
is 209
.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
05AB1E, 16 bytes
Ƶ.L+ε‚ε4Åp%Ë}à
Try it online or verify all test cases.
Explanation:
Ƶ.L # Create a list in the range [1,209] (which is k)
+ # Add the (implicit) input to each (which is n+k)
ε # Map each value to:
‚ # Pair it with the (implicit) input
ε # Map both to:
4Åp # Get the first 4 primes: [2,3,5,7]
% # Modulo the current number by each of these four (now we have R_n and R_n+k)
# Sort the list
Ë # After the inner map: check if both sorted lists are equal
}à # After the outer map: check if any are truthy by taking the maximum
# (which is output implicitly as result)
See this 05AB1E tip of mine (section How to compress large integers?) to understand why Ƶ.
is 209
.
$endgroup$
05AB1E, 16 bytes
Ƶ.L+ε‚ε4Åp%Ë}à
Try it online or verify all test cases.
Explanation:
Ƶ.L # Create a list in the range [1,209] (which is k)
+ # Add the (implicit) input to each (which is n+k)
ε # Map each value to:
‚ # Pair it with the (implicit) input
ε # Map both to:
4Åp # Get the first 4 primes: [2,3,5,7]
% # Modulo the current number by each of these four (now we have R_n and R_n+k)
# Sort the list
Ë # After the inner map: check if both sorted lists are equal
}à # After the outer map: check if any are truthy by taking the maximum
# (which is output implicitly as result)
See this 05AB1E tip of mine (section How to compress large integers?) to understand why Ƶ.
is 209
.
answered 2 days ago
Kevin CruijssenKevin Cruijssen
42.3k570217
42.3k570217
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
J, 40 bytes
1 e.(>:+i.@209)-:&(/:~)&(2 3 5 7&|"1 0)]
Try it online!
Brute force...
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
J, 40 bytes
1 e.(>:+i.@209)-:&(/:~)&(2 3 5 7&|"1 0)]
Try it online!
Brute force...
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
J, 40 bytes
1 e.(>:+i.@209)-:&(/:~)&(2 3 5 7&|"1 0)]
Try it online!
Brute force...
$endgroup$
J, 40 bytes
1 e.(>:+i.@209)-:&(/:~)&(2 3 5 7&|"1 0)]
Try it online!
Brute force...
answered 2 days ago
Galen IvanovGalen Ivanov
7,38211034
7,38211034
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 56 bytes
Or@@(Min[s-#]>0&/@Rest@Permutations@Mod[#,s=2,3,5,7])&
Try it online!
Finds all non-identity permutations of the remainders of the input modulo 2, 3, 5, 7, and checks if any of them are below 2,3,5,7
in each coordinate. Note that Or@@
is False
.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 56 bytes
Or@@(Min[s-#]>0&/@Rest@Permutations@Mod[#,s=2,3,5,7])&
Try it online!
Finds all non-identity permutations of the remainders of the input modulo 2, 3, 5, 7, and checks if any of them are below 2,3,5,7
in each coordinate. Note that Or@@
is False
.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 56 bytes
Or@@(Min[s-#]>0&/@Rest@Permutations@Mod[#,s=2,3,5,7])&
Try it online!
Finds all non-identity permutations of the remainders of the input modulo 2, 3, 5, 7, and checks if any of them are below 2,3,5,7
in each coordinate. Note that Or@@
is False
.
$endgroup$
Wolfram Language (Mathematica), 56 bytes
Or@@(Min[s-#]>0&/@Rest@Permutations@Mod[#,s=2,3,5,7])&
Try it online!
Finds all non-identity permutations of the remainders of the input modulo 2, 3, 5, 7, and checks if any of them are below 2,3,5,7
in each coordinate. Note that Or@@
is False
.
answered 2 days ago
Misha LavrovMisha Lavrov
4,261424
4,261424
add a comment |
add a comment |
If this is an answer to a challenge…
…Be sure to follow the challenge specification. However, please refrain from exploiting obvious loopholes. Answers abusing any of the standard loopholes are considered invalid. If you think a specification is unclear or underspecified, comment on the question instead.
…Try to optimize your score. For instance, answers to code-golf challenges should attempt to be as short as possible. You can always include a readable version of the code in addition to the competitive one.
Explanations of your answer make it more interesting to read and are very much encouraged.…Include a short header which indicates the language(s) of your code and its score, as defined by the challenge.
More generally…
…Please make sure to answer the question and provide sufficient detail.
…Avoid asking for help, clarification or responding to other answers (use comments instead).
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodegolf.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f182669%2fdo-i-have-a-twin-with-permutated-remainders%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown