Cisco ASA 5585X Internal-Data0/1 interface errors The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Output Drops on Serial interface: Better queueing or Output queue size?ASA IPS issue: routing and management interfaceHow can I reasonably verify my QoS configuration is working?Output drops on serial interface when service-policy appliedDifference between CRC and input errors - show interfaceInterface on ASA 5525 cannot turn up/upASA unable to pass ICMP and RDP through internal interfacesCisco 3560 interface counters, are the counters reset automatically?How to assign a second available Public ip for NAT (Dynamic PAT) to Inside Network Cisco ASA 5516-XTrunk on the outside ASA interface

Does Parliament need to approve the new Brexit delay to 31 October 2019?

Homework question about an engine pulling a train

Circular reasoning in L'Hopital's rule

Is there a writing software that you can sort scenes like slides in PowerPoint?

Why are PDP-7-style microprogrammed instructions out of vogue?

Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?

Presidential Pardon

Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?

Could an empire control the whole planet with today's comunication methods?

Variable with quotation marks "$()"

Is 'stolen' appropriate word?

Why can't wing-mounted spoilers be used to steepen approaches?

Drawing vertical/oblique lines in Metrical tree (tikz-qtree, tipa)

Didn't get enough time to take a Coding Test - what to do now?

Accepted by European university, rejected by all American ones I applied to? Possible reasons?

What force causes entropy to increase?

Can the Right Ascension and Argument of Perigee of a spacecraft's orbit keep varying by themselves with time?

Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?

How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?

For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?

Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?

US Healthcare consultation for visitors

Why doesn't a hydraulic lever violate conservation of energy?

Is this wall load bearing? Blueprints and photos attached



Cisco ASA 5585X Internal-Data0/1 interface errors



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Output Drops on Serial interface: Better queueing or Output queue size?ASA IPS issue: routing and management interfaceHow can I reasonably verify my QoS configuration is working?Output drops on serial interface when service-policy appliedDifference between CRC and input errors - show interfaceInterface on ASA 5525 cannot turn up/upASA unable to pass ICMP and RDP through internal interfacesCisco 3560 interface counters, are the counters reset automatically?How to assign a second available Public ip for NAT (Dynamic PAT) to Inside Network Cisco ASA 5516-XTrunk on the outside ASA interface










4















I have noticed on Cisco ASA 5585 (SSP-20) interface error counter going up specially overrun but so far we haven't seen any production impact or issue, error rate is low so its not noticable but would like to track it down what could be the issue.



asa/pri/act# show int detail | b Internal-Data0/1
Interface Internal-Data0/1 "", is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is i82599_xaui rev01, BW 10000 Mbps, DLY 10 usec
(Full-duplex), (10000 Mbps)
Input flow control is on, output flow control is off
MAC address 0000.0001.0002, MTU not set
IP address unassigned
1647603170965 packets input, 997527140937135 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 864639959 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants
16931212 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 16931212 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
0 pause input, 0 resume input
0 L2 decode drops, 0 demux drops
1384367635589 packets output, 843565440564127 bytes, 111 underruns
0 pause output, 0 resume output
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets
0 late collisions, 0 deferred
0 output decode drops
0 input reset drops, 0 output reset drops
Queue Stats:
RX[00]: 422029984108 packets, 255396173038299 bytes, 15836342 overrun
Blocks free curr/low: 511/112
RX[01]: 407016123288 packets, 245899431598039 bytes, 269316 overrun
Blocks free curr/low: 511/168
RX[02]: 413500421902 packets, 253352037908193 bytes, 566063 overrun
Blocks free curr/low: 511/264
RX[03]: 405056641781 packets, 242879498449889 bytes, 259491 overrun
Blocks free curr/low: 511/189
TX[00]: 330190721654 packets, 199847247773742 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 508/121
TX[01]: 338943972803 packets, 207641035134472 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 511/116
TX[02]: 351032018606 packets, 213654237791772 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 510/250
TX[03]: 334102657656 packets, 196810495181007 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 510/90
TX[04]: 0 packets, 0 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 511/511
Used by GigabitEthernet0/5
TX[05]: 4 packets, 528 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 511/509
Used by TenGigabitEthernet0/9
TX[06]: 4 packets, 528 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 511/510
Used by TenGigabitEthernet0/8
TX[07]: 30112705950 packets, 25621895258706 bytes, 111 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 511/0
Used by GigabitEthernet0/6
TX[08]: 21 packets, 1180 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 511/510
Used by GigabitEthernet0/7
Topology Information:
This interface, a SSP Embedded NIC Port, is connected
with Internal-Data0/3, a SSP Switch Uplink Port.
Control Point Interface States:
Interface number is 3
Interface config status is active
Interface state is active


I did basic troubleshooting like cpu-hog etc but not seeing any massive hog etc.



currently max conn count is ~40k around and 400mbps traffic rate with 75kpps rate.



enter image description here



Interface error rate graph



enter image description here










share|improve this question






















  • Basically, you are running services that take too much time so that the input queue cannot be serviced with the amount of traffic it is receiving, and packets are dropped because the queue is full. The more services you run, the lower the actual throughput. This happens from time-to-time as traffic spikes, and it is only important if it is negatively affecting you, at which point you must upgrade or replace the device.

    – Ron Maupin
    Apr 9 at 13:34












  • I have updated my answer with troubleshooting information and graphs you can make yourself to see what is going on.

    – Cown
    Apr 9 at 13:45















4















I have noticed on Cisco ASA 5585 (SSP-20) interface error counter going up specially overrun but so far we haven't seen any production impact or issue, error rate is low so its not noticable but would like to track it down what could be the issue.



asa/pri/act# show int detail | b Internal-Data0/1
Interface Internal-Data0/1 "", is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is i82599_xaui rev01, BW 10000 Mbps, DLY 10 usec
(Full-duplex), (10000 Mbps)
Input flow control is on, output flow control is off
MAC address 0000.0001.0002, MTU not set
IP address unassigned
1647603170965 packets input, 997527140937135 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 864639959 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants
16931212 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 16931212 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
0 pause input, 0 resume input
0 L2 decode drops, 0 demux drops
1384367635589 packets output, 843565440564127 bytes, 111 underruns
0 pause output, 0 resume output
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets
0 late collisions, 0 deferred
0 output decode drops
0 input reset drops, 0 output reset drops
Queue Stats:
RX[00]: 422029984108 packets, 255396173038299 bytes, 15836342 overrun
Blocks free curr/low: 511/112
RX[01]: 407016123288 packets, 245899431598039 bytes, 269316 overrun
Blocks free curr/low: 511/168
RX[02]: 413500421902 packets, 253352037908193 bytes, 566063 overrun
Blocks free curr/low: 511/264
RX[03]: 405056641781 packets, 242879498449889 bytes, 259491 overrun
Blocks free curr/low: 511/189
TX[00]: 330190721654 packets, 199847247773742 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 508/121
TX[01]: 338943972803 packets, 207641035134472 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 511/116
TX[02]: 351032018606 packets, 213654237791772 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 510/250
TX[03]: 334102657656 packets, 196810495181007 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 510/90
TX[04]: 0 packets, 0 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 511/511
Used by GigabitEthernet0/5
TX[05]: 4 packets, 528 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 511/509
Used by TenGigabitEthernet0/9
TX[06]: 4 packets, 528 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 511/510
Used by TenGigabitEthernet0/8
TX[07]: 30112705950 packets, 25621895258706 bytes, 111 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 511/0
Used by GigabitEthernet0/6
TX[08]: 21 packets, 1180 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 511/510
Used by GigabitEthernet0/7
Topology Information:
This interface, a SSP Embedded NIC Port, is connected
with Internal-Data0/3, a SSP Switch Uplink Port.
Control Point Interface States:
Interface number is 3
Interface config status is active
Interface state is active


I did basic troubleshooting like cpu-hog etc but not seeing any massive hog etc.



currently max conn count is ~40k around and 400mbps traffic rate with 75kpps rate.



enter image description here



Interface error rate graph



enter image description here










share|improve this question






















  • Basically, you are running services that take too much time so that the input queue cannot be serviced with the amount of traffic it is receiving, and packets are dropped because the queue is full. The more services you run, the lower the actual throughput. This happens from time-to-time as traffic spikes, and it is only important if it is negatively affecting you, at which point you must upgrade or replace the device.

    – Ron Maupin
    Apr 9 at 13:34












  • I have updated my answer with troubleshooting information and graphs you can make yourself to see what is going on.

    – Cown
    Apr 9 at 13:45













4












4








4


1






I have noticed on Cisco ASA 5585 (SSP-20) interface error counter going up specially overrun but so far we haven't seen any production impact or issue, error rate is low so its not noticable but would like to track it down what could be the issue.



asa/pri/act# show int detail | b Internal-Data0/1
Interface Internal-Data0/1 "", is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is i82599_xaui rev01, BW 10000 Mbps, DLY 10 usec
(Full-duplex), (10000 Mbps)
Input flow control is on, output flow control is off
MAC address 0000.0001.0002, MTU not set
IP address unassigned
1647603170965 packets input, 997527140937135 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 864639959 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants
16931212 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 16931212 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
0 pause input, 0 resume input
0 L2 decode drops, 0 demux drops
1384367635589 packets output, 843565440564127 bytes, 111 underruns
0 pause output, 0 resume output
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets
0 late collisions, 0 deferred
0 output decode drops
0 input reset drops, 0 output reset drops
Queue Stats:
RX[00]: 422029984108 packets, 255396173038299 bytes, 15836342 overrun
Blocks free curr/low: 511/112
RX[01]: 407016123288 packets, 245899431598039 bytes, 269316 overrun
Blocks free curr/low: 511/168
RX[02]: 413500421902 packets, 253352037908193 bytes, 566063 overrun
Blocks free curr/low: 511/264
RX[03]: 405056641781 packets, 242879498449889 bytes, 259491 overrun
Blocks free curr/low: 511/189
TX[00]: 330190721654 packets, 199847247773742 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 508/121
TX[01]: 338943972803 packets, 207641035134472 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 511/116
TX[02]: 351032018606 packets, 213654237791772 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 510/250
TX[03]: 334102657656 packets, 196810495181007 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 510/90
TX[04]: 0 packets, 0 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 511/511
Used by GigabitEthernet0/5
TX[05]: 4 packets, 528 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 511/509
Used by TenGigabitEthernet0/9
TX[06]: 4 packets, 528 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 511/510
Used by TenGigabitEthernet0/8
TX[07]: 30112705950 packets, 25621895258706 bytes, 111 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 511/0
Used by GigabitEthernet0/6
TX[08]: 21 packets, 1180 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 511/510
Used by GigabitEthernet0/7
Topology Information:
This interface, a SSP Embedded NIC Port, is connected
with Internal-Data0/3, a SSP Switch Uplink Port.
Control Point Interface States:
Interface number is 3
Interface config status is active
Interface state is active


I did basic troubleshooting like cpu-hog etc but not seeing any massive hog etc.



currently max conn count is ~40k around and 400mbps traffic rate with 75kpps rate.



enter image description here



Interface error rate graph



enter image description here










share|improve this question














I have noticed on Cisco ASA 5585 (SSP-20) interface error counter going up specially overrun but so far we haven't seen any production impact or issue, error rate is low so its not noticable but would like to track it down what could be the issue.



asa/pri/act# show int detail | b Internal-Data0/1
Interface Internal-Data0/1 "", is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is i82599_xaui rev01, BW 10000 Mbps, DLY 10 usec
(Full-duplex), (10000 Mbps)
Input flow control is on, output flow control is off
MAC address 0000.0001.0002, MTU not set
IP address unassigned
1647603170965 packets input, 997527140937135 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 864639959 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants
16931212 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 16931212 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
0 pause input, 0 resume input
0 L2 decode drops, 0 demux drops
1384367635589 packets output, 843565440564127 bytes, 111 underruns
0 pause output, 0 resume output
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets
0 late collisions, 0 deferred
0 output decode drops
0 input reset drops, 0 output reset drops
Queue Stats:
RX[00]: 422029984108 packets, 255396173038299 bytes, 15836342 overrun
Blocks free curr/low: 511/112
RX[01]: 407016123288 packets, 245899431598039 bytes, 269316 overrun
Blocks free curr/low: 511/168
RX[02]: 413500421902 packets, 253352037908193 bytes, 566063 overrun
Blocks free curr/low: 511/264
RX[03]: 405056641781 packets, 242879498449889 bytes, 259491 overrun
Blocks free curr/low: 511/189
TX[00]: 330190721654 packets, 199847247773742 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 508/121
TX[01]: 338943972803 packets, 207641035134472 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 511/116
TX[02]: 351032018606 packets, 213654237791772 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 510/250
TX[03]: 334102657656 packets, 196810495181007 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 510/90
TX[04]: 0 packets, 0 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 511/511
Used by GigabitEthernet0/5
TX[05]: 4 packets, 528 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 511/509
Used by TenGigabitEthernet0/9
TX[06]: 4 packets, 528 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 511/510
Used by TenGigabitEthernet0/8
TX[07]: 30112705950 packets, 25621895258706 bytes, 111 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 511/0
Used by GigabitEthernet0/6
TX[08]: 21 packets, 1180 bytes, 0 underruns
Blocks free curr/low: 511/510
Used by GigabitEthernet0/7
Topology Information:
This interface, a SSP Embedded NIC Port, is connected
with Internal-Data0/3, a SSP Switch Uplink Port.
Control Point Interface States:
Interface number is 3
Interface config status is active
Interface state is active


I did basic troubleshooting like cpu-hog etc but not seeing any massive hog etc.



currently max conn count is ~40k around and 400mbps traffic rate with 75kpps rate.



enter image description here



Interface error rate graph



enter image description here







cisco cisco-asa firewall interface packet-loss






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Apr 9 at 1:41









SatishSatish

1,80012361




1,80012361












  • Basically, you are running services that take too much time so that the input queue cannot be serviced with the amount of traffic it is receiving, and packets are dropped because the queue is full. The more services you run, the lower the actual throughput. This happens from time-to-time as traffic spikes, and it is only important if it is negatively affecting you, at which point you must upgrade or replace the device.

    – Ron Maupin
    Apr 9 at 13:34












  • I have updated my answer with troubleshooting information and graphs you can make yourself to see what is going on.

    – Cown
    Apr 9 at 13:45

















  • Basically, you are running services that take too much time so that the input queue cannot be serviced with the amount of traffic it is receiving, and packets are dropped because the queue is full. The more services you run, the lower the actual throughput. This happens from time-to-time as traffic spikes, and it is only important if it is negatively affecting you, at which point you must upgrade or replace the device.

    – Ron Maupin
    Apr 9 at 13:34












  • I have updated my answer with troubleshooting information and graphs you can make yourself to see what is going on.

    – Cown
    Apr 9 at 13:45
















Basically, you are running services that take too much time so that the input queue cannot be serviced with the amount of traffic it is receiving, and packets are dropped because the queue is full. The more services you run, the lower the actual throughput. This happens from time-to-time as traffic spikes, and it is only important if it is negatively affecting you, at which point you must upgrade or replace the device.

– Ron Maupin
Apr 9 at 13:34






Basically, you are running services that take too much time so that the input queue cannot be serviced with the amount of traffic it is receiving, and packets are dropped because the queue is full. The more services you run, the lower the actual throughput. This happens from time-to-time as traffic spikes, and it is only important if it is negatively affecting you, at which point you must upgrade or replace the device.

– Ron Maupin
Apr 9 at 13:34














I have updated my answer with troubleshooting information and graphs you can make yourself to see what is going on.

– Cown
Apr 9 at 13:45





I have updated my answer with troubleshooting information and graphs you can make yourself to see what is going on.

– Cown
Apr 9 at 13:45










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4














From Cisco tech note:




The ASA interface error counter "overrun" tracks the number of times
that a packet was received on the network interface, but there was no
available space in the interface FIFO queue to store the packet. Thus,
the packet was dropped. The value of this counter can be seen with the
show interface command.







share|improve this answer






























    3














    Looks like you might have hit the limit of what your current setup with SSP20 is capable off. We've recently had the same issues, where according to the Cisco datasheet and online specifications, it shouldn't have hit the limit.



    Cisco TAC on the other had advised us, that with the setup we had, the limit was 2 Gbit/s with full inspection, application control (AVC) and url/malware filtering. We could've upgraded our firewalls to SSP60, but comparing prices and service with the new Next Generation Firewalls, that would economically be a bad idea.



    It ended up with us upgrading to NGFW 4120, which can do 10 Gbit/s full inspection with url and malware filtering.



    The ASA5585X is a really great all round firewall, but it's old and that reflects a lot on the hardware it's based on.



    I have been unable to find the document Cisco TAC sent us online, so i've uploaded the version they sent us to my own page, you can download it below. Here's a screen shot:



    enter image description here



    Another screenshot from Cisco Live 2015 and the material i have:



    enter image description here



    Download: http://mooo.dk/Cisco_ASA_Datasheet_2015.pdf



    Here are a few screenshots from Cisco TAC troubleshooting and finding out what the problem was:



    Interface peaking at 2 Gbit/s
    enter image description here



    Interface error counter and show interface outside
    enter image description here



    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer

























    • I'm using this firewall for basic ACL to isolate subnets, I am not using for any IPS/AVC or any kind of other feature. We have 30 users for any connect VPN, so question is how do I find out it reached to Max capacity because I'm not seeing it's even using 2gbps anywhere. Does 2 Gbps cap calculate by all interface bandwidth ?

      – Satish
      Apr 9 at 12:13











    • @Satish Sorry, i've edited my answer to assuming this could be the problem. Calculation is per interface or virtual group.

      – Cown
      Apr 9 at 13:32












    • @Satish Your drop rate looks exactly how ours looked like. I would suggest opening a Cisco TAC case. I have added some screenshots from Cisco TAC troubleshooting session.

      – Cown
      Apr 9 at 13:43











    • Thanks for details, tell me one thing in interface graph you posted that is one specific interface graph or aggregated graph of all interface? I really want to find out where i am hitting 2Gbps limit. We don't have TAC support for this specific device.

      – Satish
      Apr 9 at 15:56











    • @Satish Says on the picture. Interface Outside. Just above the graph.

      – Cown
      Apr 9 at 16:27












    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "496"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f58316%2fcisco-asa-5585x-internal-data0-1-interface-errors%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    From Cisco tech note:




    The ASA interface error counter "overrun" tracks the number of times
    that a packet was received on the network interface, but there was no
    available space in the interface FIFO queue to store the packet. Thus,
    the packet was dropped. The value of this counter can be seen with the
    show interface command.







    share|improve this answer



























      4














      From Cisco tech note:




      The ASA interface error counter "overrun" tracks the number of times
      that a packet was received on the network interface, but there was no
      available space in the interface FIFO queue to store the packet. Thus,
      the packet was dropped. The value of this counter can be seen with the
      show interface command.







      share|improve this answer

























        4












        4








        4







        From Cisco tech note:




        The ASA interface error counter "overrun" tracks the number of times
        that a packet was received on the network interface, but there was no
        available space in the interface FIFO queue to store the packet. Thus,
        the packet was dropped. The value of this counter can be seen with the
        show interface command.







        share|improve this answer













        From Cisco tech note:




        The ASA interface error counter "overrun" tracks the number of times
        that a packet was received on the network interface, but there was no
        available space in the interface FIFO queue to store the packet. Thus,
        the packet was dropped. The value of this counter can be seen with the
        show interface command.








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Apr 9 at 3:24









        Ron TrunkRon Trunk

        39.8k33781




        39.8k33781





















            3














            Looks like you might have hit the limit of what your current setup with SSP20 is capable off. We've recently had the same issues, where according to the Cisco datasheet and online specifications, it shouldn't have hit the limit.



            Cisco TAC on the other had advised us, that with the setup we had, the limit was 2 Gbit/s with full inspection, application control (AVC) and url/malware filtering. We could've upgraded our firewalls to SSP60, but comparing prices and service with the new Next Generation Firewalls, that would economically be a bad idea.



            It ended up with us upgrading to NGFW 4120, which can do 10 Gbit/s full inspection with url and malware filtering.



            The ASA5585X is a really great all round firewall, but it's old and that reflects a lot on the hardware it's based on.



            I have been unable to find the document Cisco TAC sent us online, so i've uploaded the version they sent us to my own page, you can download it below. Here's a screen shot:



            enter image description here



            Another screenshot from Cisco Live 2015 and the material i have:



            enter image description here



            Download: http://mooo.dk/Cisco_ASA_Datasheet_2015.pdf



            Here are a few screenshots from Cisco TAC troubleshooting and finding out what the problem was:



            Interface peaking at 2 Gbit/s
            enter image description here



            Interface error counter and show interface outside
            enter image description here



            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer

























            • I'm using this firewall for basic ACL to isolate subnets, I am not using for any IPS/AVC or any kind of other feature. We have 30 users for any connect VPN, so question is how do I find out it reached to Max capacity because I'm not seeing it's even using 2gbps anywhere. Does 2 Gbps cap calculate by all interface bandwidth ?

              – Satish
              Apr 9 at 12:13











            • @Satish Sorry, i've edited my answer to assuming this could be the problem. Calculation is per interface or virtual group.

              – Cown
              Apr 9 at 13:32












            • @Satish Your drop rate looks exactly how ours looked like. I would suggest opening a Cisco TAC case. I have added some screenshots from Cisco TAC troubleshooting session.

              – Cown
              Apr 9 at 13:43











            • Thanks for details, tell me one thing in interface graph you posted that is one specific interface graph or aggregated graph of all interface? I really want to find out where i am hitting 2Gbps limit. We don't have TAC support for this specific device.

              – Satish
              Apr 9 at 15:56











            • @Satish Says on the picture. Interface Outside. Just above the graph.

              – Cown
              Apr 9 at 16:27
















            3














            Looks like you might have hit the limit of what your current setup with SSP20 is capable off. We've recently had the same issues, where according to the Cisco datasheet and online specifications, it shouldn't have hit the limit.



            Cisco TAC on the other had advised us, that with the setup we had, the limit was 2 Gbit/s with full inspection, application control (AVC) and url/malware filtering. We could've upgraded our firewalls to SSP60, but comparing prices and service with the new Next Generation Firewalls, that would economically be a bad idea.



            It ended up with us upgrading to NGFW 4120, which can do 10 Gbit/s full inspection with url and malware filtering.



            The ASA5585X is a really great all round firewall, but it's old and that reflects a lot on the hardware it's based on.



            I have been unable to find the document Cisco TAC sent us online, so i've uploaded the version they sent us to my own page, you can download it below. Here's a screen shot:



            enter image description here



            Another screenshot from Cisco Live 2015 and the material i have:



            enter image description here



            Download: http://mooo.dk/Cisco_ASA_Datasheet_2015.pdf



            Here are a few screenshots from Cisco TAC troubleshooting and finding out what the problem was:



            Interface peaking at 2 Gbit/s
            enter image description here



            Interface error counter and show interface outside
            enter image description here



            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer

























            • I'm using this firewall for basic ACL to isolate subnets, I am not using for any IPS/AVC or any kind of other feature. We have 30 users for any connect VPN, so question is how do I find out it reached to Max capacity because I'm not seeing it's even using 2gbps anywhere. Does 2 Gbps cap calculate by all interface bandwidth ?

              – Satish
              Apr 9 at 12:13











            • @Satish Sorry, i've edited my answer to assuming this could be the problem. Calculation is per interface or virtual group.

              – Cown
              Apr 9 at 13:32












            • @Satish Your drop rate looks exactly how ours looked like. I would suggest opening a Cisco TAC case. I have added some screenshots from Cisco TAC troubleshooting session.

              – Cown
              Apr 9 at 13:43











            • Thanks for details, tell me one thing in interface graph you posted that is one specific interface graph or aggregated graph of all interface? I really want to find out where i am hitting 2Gbps limit. We don't have TAC support for this specific device.

              – Satish
              Apr 9 at 15:56











            • @Satish Says on the picture. Interface Outside. Just above the graph.

              – Cown
              Apr 9 at 16:27














            3












            3








            3







            Looks like you might have hit the limit of what your current setup with SSP20 is capable off. We've recently had the same issues, where according to the Cisco datasheet and online specifications, it shouldn't have hit the limit.



            Cisco TAC on the other had advised us, that with the setup we had, the limit was 2 Gbit/s with full inspection, application control (AVC) and url/malware filtering. We could've upgraded our firewalls to SSP60, but comparing prices and service with the new Next Generation Firewalls, that would economically be a bad idea.



            It ended up with us upgrading to NGFW 4120, which can do 10 Gbit/s full inspection with url and malware filtering.



            The ASA5585X is a really great all round firewall, but it's old and that reflects a lot on the hardware it's based on.



            I have been unable to find the document Cisco TAC sent us online, so i've uploaded the version they sent us to my own page, you can download it below. Here's a screen shot:



            enter image description here



            Another screenshot from Cisco Live 2015 and the material i have:



            enter image description here



            Download: http://mooo.dk/Cisco_ASA_Datasheet_2015.pdf



            Here are a few screenshots from Cisco TAC troubleshooting and finding out what the problem was:



            Interface peaking at 2 Gbit/s
            enter image description here



            Interface error counter and show interface outside
            enter image description here



            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer















            Looks like you might have hit the limit of what your current setup with SSP20 is capable off. We've recently had the same issues, where according to the Cisco datasheet and online specifications, it shouldn't have hit the limit.



            Cisco TAC on the other had advised us, that with the setup we had, the limit was 2 Gbit/s with full inspection, application control (AVC) and url/malware filtering. We could've upgraded our firewalls to SSP60, but comparing prices and service with the new Next Generation Firewalls, that would economically be a bad idea.



            It ended up with us upgrading to NGFW 4120, which can do 10 Gbit/s full inspection with url and malware filtering.



            The ASA5585X is a really great all round firewall, but it's old and that reflects a lot on the hardware it's based on.



            I have been unable to find the document Cisco TAC sent us online, so i've uploaded the version they sent us to my own page, you can download it below. Here's a screen shot:



            enter image description here



            Another screenshot from Cisco Live 2015 and the material i have:



            enter image description here



            Download: http://mooo.dk/Cisco_ASA_Datasheet_2015.pdf



            Here are a few screenshots from Cisco TAC troubleshooting and finding out what the problem was:



            Interface peaking at 2 Gbit/s
            enter image description here



            Interface error counter and show interface outside
            enter image description here



            enter image description here







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Apr 9 at 13:43

























            answered Apr 9 at 8:14









            CownCown

            6,98631031




            6,98631031












            • I'm using this firewall for basic ACL to isolate subnets, I am not using for any IPS/AVC or any kind of other feature. We have 30 users for any connect VPN, so question is how do I find out it reached to Max capacity because I'm not seeing it's even using 2gbps anywhere. Does 2 Gbps cap calculate by all interface bandwidth ?

              – Satish
              Apr 9 at 12:13











            • @Satish Sorry, i've edited my answer to assuming this could be the problem. Calculation is per interface or virtual group.

              – Cown
              Apr 9 at 13:32












            • @Satish Your drop rate looks exactly how ours looked like. I would suggest opening a Cisco TAC case. I have added some screenshots from Cisco TAC troubleshooting session.

              – Cown
              Apr 9 at 13:43











            • Thanks for details, tell me one thing in interface graph you posted that is one specific interface graph or aggregated graph of all interface? I really want to find out where i am hitting 2Gbps limit. We don't have TAC support for this specific device.

              – Satish
              Apr 9 at 15:56











            • @Satish Says on the picture. Interface Outside. Just above the graph.

              – Cown
              Apr 9 at 16:27


















            • I'm using this firewall for basic ACL to isolate subnets, I am not using for any IPS/AVC or any kind of other feature. We have 30 users for any connect VPN, so question is how do I find out it reached to Max capacity because I'm not seeing it's even using 2gbps anywhere. Does 2 Gbps cap calculate by all interface bandwidth ?

              – Satish
              Apr 9 at 12:13











            • @Satish Sorry, i've edited my answer to assuming this could be the problem. Calculation is per interface or virtual group.

              – Cown
              Apr 9 at 13:32












            • @Satish Your drop rate looks exactly how ours looked like. I would suggest opening a Cisco TAC case. I have added some screenshots from Cisco TAC troubleshooting session.

              – Cown
              Apr 9 at 13:43











            • Thanks for details, tell me one thing in interface graph you posted that is one specific interface graph or aggregated graph of all interface? I really want to find out where i am hitting 2Gbps limit. We don't have TAC support for this specific device.

              – Satish
              Apr 9 at 15:56











            • @Satish Says on the picture. Interface Outside. Just above the graph.

              – Cown
              Apr 9 at 16:27

















            I'm using this firewall for basic ACL to isolate subnets, I am not using for any IPS/AVC or any kind of other feature. We have 30 users for any connect VPN, so question is how do I find out it reached to Max capacity because I'm not seeing it's even using 2gbps anywhere. Does 2 Gbps cap calculate by all interface bandwidth ?

            – Satish
            Apr 9 at 12:13





            I'm using this firewall for basic ACL to isolate subnets, I am not using for any IPS/AVC or any kind of other feature. We have 30 users for any connect VPN, so question is how do I find out it reached to Max capacity because I'm not seeing it's even using 2gbps anywhere. Does 2 Gbps cap calculate by all interface bandwidth ?

            – Satish
            Apr 9 at 12:13













            @Satish Sorry, i've edited my answer to assuming this could be the problem. Calculation is per interface or virtual group.

            – Cown
            Apr 9 at 13:32






            @Satish Sorry, i've edited my answer to assuming this could be the problem. Calculation is per interface or virtual group.

            – Cown
            Apr 9 at 13:32














            @Satish Your drop rate looks exactly how ours looked like. I would suggest opening a Cisco TAC case. I have added some screenshots from Cisco TAC troubleshooting session.

            – Cown
            Apr 9 at 13:43





            @Satish Your drop rate looks exactly how ours looked like. I would suggest opening a Cisco TAC case. I have added some screenshots from Cisco TAC troubleshooting session.

            – Cown
            Apr 9 at 13:43













            Thanks for details, tell me one thing in interface graph you posted that is one specific interface graph or aggregated graph of all interface? I really want to find out where i am hitting 2Gbps limit. We don't have TAC support for this specific device.

            – Satish
            Apr 9 at 15:56





            Thanks for details, tell me one thing in interface graph you posted that is one specific interface graph or aggregated graph of all interface? I really want to find out where i am hitting 2Gbps limit. We don't have TAC support for this specific device.

            – Satish
            Apr 9 at 15:56













            @Satish Says on the picture. Interface Outside. Just above the graph.

            – Cown
            Apr 9 at 16:27






            @Satish Says on the picture. Interface Outside. Just above the graph.

            – Cown
            Apr 9 at 16:27


















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Network Engineering Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f58316%2fcisco-asa-5585x-internal-data0-1-interface-errors%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Sum ergo cogito? 1 nng

            三茅街道4182Guuntc Dn precexpngmageondP