Can we say or write : “No, it'sn't”? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowIs it uncommon to end a sentence with a contraction?How to choose a proper contraction “it's not” versus “it isn't”?Can I always use “'d” as contraction of “did”?Why don't we contract “it is” in “If it is, then…”Can I ask “Is not he calling me”?About English practice for writing in forumsHow to use “not” and “don't”Why is “… how it's to be a child” incorrect?Can he's always be used instead of he is?Is it ok to short words more than one time, like I'ven't?

Players Circumventing the limitations of Wish

Reshaping json / reparing json inside shell script (remove trailing comma)

Lucky Feat: How can "more than one creature spend a luck point to influence the outcome of a roll"?

What is the process for cleansing a very negative action

TikZ: How to fill area with a special pattern?

How do I fit a non linear curve?

Where do students learn to solve polynomial equations these days?

Why am I getting "Static method cannot be referenced from a non static context: String String.valueOf(Object)"?

Computationally populating tables with probability data

Is there a difference between "Fahrstuhl" and "Aufzug"?

Cannot shrink btrfs filesystem although there is still data and metadata space left : ERROR: unable to resize '/home': No space left on device

Is it ok to trim down a tube patch?

IC has pull-down resistors on SMBus lines?

How to use ReplaceAll on an expression that contains a rule

Can this note be analyzed as a non-chord tone?

Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?

vector calculus integration identity problem

What difference does it make using sed with/without whitespaces?

Can I board the first leg of the flight without having final country's visa?

Graph of the history of databases

Defamation due to breach of confidentiality

What was Carter Burke's job for "the company" in Aliens?

Scary film where a woman has vaginal teeth

Is there an equivalent of cd - for cp or mv



Can we say or write : “No, it'sn't”?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowIs it uncommon to end a sentence with a contraction?How to choose a proper contraction “it's not” versus “it isn't”?Can I always use “'d” as contraction of “did”?Why don't we contract “it is” in “If it is, then…”Can I ask “Is not he calling me”?About English practice for writing in forumsHow to use “not” and “don't”Why is “… how it's to be a child” incorrect?Can he's always be used instead of he is?Is it ok to short words more than one time, like I'ven't?










10















I know we can answer either :



  • No, it's not

  • No, it isn't

But is it accepted and understandable to write :




No, it'sn't




What about saying it ?










share|improve this question









New contributor




J.Khamphousone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Related: english.stackexchange.com/q/15001/216106

    – Davo
    2 days ago






  • 3





    Nobody says it, because it's unpronounceable. I don't think you need any more "logic" than that fact!

    – alephzero
    2 days ago











  • It is incorrect in writing and it is incorrect in speech.

    – chasly from UK
    2 days ago






  • 2





    If you are Charles Lutwidge Dodgson (aka Lewis Carroll) you may write this. If you aren't, you mayn't.

    – A. I. Breveleri
    yesterday







  • 1





    @alephzero: Do you find it harder to pronounce than isn't or hadn't?

    – ruakh
    22 hours ago















10















I know we can answer either :



  • No, it's not

  • No, it isn't

But is it accepted and understandable to write :




No, it'sn't




What about saying it ?










share|improve this question









New contributor




J.Khamphousone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Related: english.stackexchange.com/q/15001/216106

    – Davo
    2 days ago






  • 3





    Nobody says it, because it's unpronounceable. I don't think you need any more "logic" than that fact!

    – alephzero
    2 days ago











  • It is incorrect in writing and it is incorrect in speech.

    – chasly from UK
    2 days ago






  • 2





    If you are Charles Lutwidge Dodgson (aka Lewis Carroll) you may write this. If you aren't, you mayn't.

    – A. I. Breveleri
    yesterday







  • 1





    @alephzero: Do you find it harder to pronounce than isn't or hadn't?

    – ruakh
    22 hours ago













10












10








10


3






I know we can answer either :



  • No, it's not

  • No, it isn't

But is it accepted and understandable to write :




No, it'sn't




What about saying it ?










share|improve this question









New contributor




J.Khamphousone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I know we can answer either :



  • No, it's not

  • No, it isn't

But is it accepted and understandable to write :




No, it'sn't




What about saying it ?







contractions answers






share|improve this question









New contributor




J.Khamphousone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




J.Khamphousone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Jasper

19.2k43771




19.2k43771






New contributor




J.Khamphousone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









J.KhamphousoneJ.Khamphousone

15115




15115




New contributor




J.Khamphousone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





J.Khamphousone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






J.Khamphousone is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Related: english.stackexchange.com/q/15001/216106

    – Davo
    2 days ago






  • 3





    Nobody says it, because it's unpronounceable. I don't think you need any more "logic" than that fact!

    – alephzero
    2 days ago











  • It is incorrect in writing and it is incorrect in speech.

    – chasly from UK
    2 days ago






  • 2





    If you are Charles Lutwidge Dodgson (aka Lewis Carroll) you may write this. If you aren't, you mayn't.

    – A. I. Breveleri
    yesterday







  • 1





    @alephzero: Do you find it harder to pronounce than isn't or hadn't?

    – ruakh
    22 hours ago

















  • Related: english.stackexchange.com/q/15001/216106

    – Davo
    2 days ago






  • 3





    Nobody says it, because it's unpronounceable. I don't think you need any more "logic" than that fact!

    – alephzero
    2 days ago











  • It is incorrect in writing and it is incorrect in speech.

    – chasly from UK
    2 days ago






  • 2





    If you are Charles Lutwidge Dodgson (aka Lewis Carroll) you may write this. If you aren't, you mayn't.

    – A. I. Breveleri
    yesterday







  • 1





    @alephzero: Do you find it harder to pronounce than isn't or hadn't?

    – ruakh
    22 hours ago
















Related: english.stackexchange.com/q/15001/216106

– Davo
2 days ago





Related: english.stackexchange.com/q/15001/216106

– Davo
2 days ago




3




3





Nobody says it, because it's unpronounceable. I don't think you need any more "logic" than that fact!

– alephzero
2 days ago





Nobody says it, because it's unpronounceable. I don't think you need any more "logic" than that fact!

– alephzero
2 days ago













It is incorrect in writing and it is incorrect in speech.

– chasly from UK
2 days ago





It is incorrect in writing and it is incorrect in speech.

– chasly from UK
2 days ago




2




2





If you are Charles Lutwidge Dodgson (aka Lewis Carroll) you may write this. If you aren't, you mayn't.

– A. I. Breveleri
yesterday






If you are Charles Lutwidge Dodgson (aka Lewis Carroll) you may write this. If you aren't, you mayn't.

– A. I. Breveleri
yesterday





1




1





@alephzero: Do you find it harder to pronounce than isn't or hadn't?

– ruakh
22 hours ago





@alephzero: Do you find it harder to pronounce than isn't or hadn't?

– ruakh
22 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















47














An acceptable, if somewhat archaic, contraction would be




'tisn't




https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%27tisn%27t






share|improve this answer








New contributor




GranBurguesa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • This is a word that I use! I'm really curious now why it is acceptable to me and it'sn't it'sn't. (Though, of course, 'tisn't is only acceptable to me at the beginning of a clause)

    – Spitemaster
    2 days ago











  • According to @Spitemaster, your answer "tisn't" can't be placed after "No", right? Like in my post, "No, 'tisn't"?

    – J.Khamphousone
    2 days ago












  • This still exists in some British English dialects as "'ti'n't." But not in written English!

    – alephzero
    2 days ago







  • 3





    t'isn't is not archaic in everyday speech in parts of the West of England.

    – Michael Harvey
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @J.Khamphousone In that case, "'tisn't" is at the start of a clause (unless I'm doing my grammar wrong). In any case, it seems alright to me.

    – Spitemaster
    2 days ago


















13














You are asking if it is acceptable to write:




No, it'sn't




The answer is: no, it is not acceptable.



A contraction is normally (and traditionally) of two words, not three. So when you intend to say "it is not" you can either contract "it is" to "it's", or "is not" to "isn't".



Exceptions to this would fall under the description of nonstandard, colloquial or dialectal contractions - where regional dialects slur words together so they sound like a contraction, but strictly speaking they should not be written as such. True, some writers of literature use artistic licence and make their own written representations of such dialects. Generally, though, these would be pronounceable phonetically. I suggest that your example of "it'sn't" is neither acceptable according to the rules of grammar, nor is it a representation of any dialect. It looks like it would be pronounced as "itsent", and that is not anything I have ever heard as a well-travelled native British English speaker.






share|improve this answer




















  • 17





    If you'd've posed this answer before I read this question, I'd've agreed.

    – Davo
    2 days ago






  • 5





    Acceptability depends in the main on the context, register, and situation. The word in question is definitely pronounceable. en.wiktionary.org/wiki/it%27sn%27t

    – userr2684291
    2 days ago






  • 12





    I disagree with "A contraction is of two words, not three". In some works you see words like "couldn't've". Perhaps it's not the primary spelling but it does seem to be an acceptable alternative to many writers.

    – Muzer
    2 days ago






  • 6





    I think you're on shaky ground when you say that three-word contractions don't exist. I wouldn't've said that. (That's another example, along with the previous comment.) In this case, the specific example wouldn't be used. I also think that while pronunciation plays part of the role, the bigger issue is simply that it isn't done with this particular set of words.

    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago







  • 3





    "O'clock" is a contraction for "o[f the ]clock", and is hardly non-standard. It does, however, have a single apostrophe, which seems to be the critical criterion for a contraction to be "standard".

    – Monty Harder
    2 days ago


















6














It is neither accepted nor understandable to say or write that. Say it isn't (2 words). Or you could say "it's not".






share|improve this answer






























    2















    'tain't okay.




    "It is not" can be contracted into a single contraction. This contraction is different from the one proposed by the original poster. According to Merriam-Webster, "'tain't" is at least 245 years old. Because it includes "ain't", it is not Standard English.






    share|improve this answer























    • "'tain't" is probably more acceptable in American English than British English.

      – Martin Bonner
      10 hours ago











    • @MartinBonner : That's 'coz AmE is tainted.

      – Magoo
      9 hours ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "481"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    J.Khamphousone is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f202946%2fcan-we-say-or-write-no-itsnt%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    47














    An acceptable, if somewhat archaic, contraction would be




    'tisn't




    https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%27tisn%27t






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    GranBurguesa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.




















    • This is a word that I use! I'm really curious now why it is acceptable to me and it'sn't it'sn't. (Though, of course, 'tisn't is only acceptable to me at the beginning of a clause)

      – Spitemaster
      2 days ago











    • According to @Spitemaster, your answer "tisn't" can't be placed after "No", right? Like in my post, "No, 'tisn't"?

      – J.Khamphousone
      2 days ago












    • This still exists in some British English dialects as "'ti'n't." But not in written English!

      – alephzero
      2 days ago







    • 3





      t'isn't is not archaic in everyday speech in parts of the West of England.

      – Michael Harvey
      2 days ago






    • 1





      @J.Khamphousone In that case, "'tisn't" is at the start of a clause (unless I'm doing my grammar wrong). In any case, it seems alright to me.

      – Spitemaster
      2 days ago















    47














    An acceptable, if somewhat archaic, contraction would be




    'tisn't




    https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%27tisn%27t






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    GranBurguesa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.




















    • This is a word that I use! I'm really curious now why it is acceptable to me and it'sn't it'sn't. (Though, of course, 'tisn't is only acceptable to me at the beginning of a clause)

      – Spitemaster
      2 days ago











    • According to @Spitemaster, your answer "tisn't" can't be placed after "No", right? Like in my post, "No, 'tisn't"?

      – J.Khamphousone
      2 days ago












    • This still exists in some British English dialects as "'ti'n't." But not in written English!

      – alephzero
      2 days ago







    • 3





      t'isn't is not archaic in everyday speech in parts of the West of England.

      – Michael Harvey
      2 days ago






    • 1





      @J.Khamphousone In that case, "'tisn't" is at the start of a clause (unless I'm doing my grammar wrong). In any case, it seems alright to me.

      – Spitemaster
      2 days ago













    47












    47








    47







    An acceptable, if somewhat archaic, contraction would be




    'tisn't




    https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%27tisn%27t






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    GranBurguesa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.










    An acceptable, if somewhat archaic, contraction would be




    'tisn't




    https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%27tisn%27t







    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    GranBurguesa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer






    New contributor




    GranBurguesa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    answered 2 days ago









    GranBurguesaGranBurguesa

    50133




    50133




    New contributor




    GranBurguesa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    New contributor





    GranBurguesa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    GranBurguesa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.












    • This is a word that I use! I'm really curious now why it is acceptable to me and it'sn't it'sn't. (Though, of course, 'tisn't is only acceptable to me at the beginning of a clause)

      – Spitemaster
      2 days ago











    • According to @Spitemaster, your answer "tisn't" can't be placed after "No", right? Like in my post, "No, 'tisn't"?

      – J.Khamphousone
      2 days ago












    • This still exists in some British English dialects as "'ti'n't." But not in written English!

      – alephzero
      2 days ago







    • 3





      t'isn't is not archaic in everyday speech in parts of the West of England.

      – Michael Harvey
      2 days ago






    • 1





      @J.Khamphousone In that case, "'tisn't" is at the start of a clause (unless I'm doing my grammar wrong). In any case, it seems alright to me.

      – Spitemaster
      2 days ago

















    • This is a word that I use! I'm really curious now why it is acceptable to me and it'sn't it'sn't. (Though, of course, 'tisn't is only acceptable to me at the beginning of a clause)

      – Spitemaster
      2 days ago











    • According to @Spitemaster, your answer "tisn't" can't be placed after "No", right? Like in my post, "No, 'tisn't"?

      – J.Khamphousone
      2 days ago












    • This still exists in some British English dialects as "'ti'n't." But not in written English!

      – alephzero
      2 days ago







    • 3





      t'isn't is not archaic in everyday speech in parts of the West of England.

      – Michael Harvey
      2 days ago






    • 1





      @J.Khamphousone In that case, "'tisn't" is at the start of a clause (unless I'm doing my grammar wrong). In any case, it seems alright to me.

      – Spitemaster
      2 days ago
















    This is a word that I use! I'm really curious now why it is acceptable to me and it'sn't it'sn't. (Though, of course, 'tisn't is only acceptable to me at the beginning of a clause)

    – Spitemaster
    2 days ago





    This is a word that I use! I'm really curious now why it is acceptable to me and it'sn't it'sn't. (Though, of course, 'tisn't is only acceptable to me at the beginning of a clause)

    – Spitemaster
    2 days ago













    According to @Spitemaster, your answer "tisn't" can't be placed after "No", right? Like in my post, "No, 'tisn't"?

    – J.Khamphousone
    2 days ago






    According to @Spitemaster, your answer "tisn't" can't be placed after "No", right? Like in my post, "No, 'tisn't"?

    – J.Khamphousone
    2 days ago














    This still exists in some British English dialects as "'ti'n't." But not in written English!

    – alephzero
    2 days ago






    This still exists in some British English dialects as "'ti'n't." But not in written English!

    – alephzero
    2 days ago





    3




    3





    t'isn't is not archaic in everyday speech in parts of the West of England.

    – Michael Harvey
    2 days ago





    t'isn't is not archaic in everyday speech in parts of the West of England.

    – Michael Harvey
    2 days ago




    1




    1





    @J.Khamphousone In that case, "'tisn't" is at the start of a clause (unless I'm doing my grammar wrong). In any case, it seems alright to me.

    – Spitemaster
    2 days ago





    @J.Khamphousone In that case, "'tisn't" is at the start of a clause (unless I'm doing my grammar wrong). In any case, it seems alright to me.

    – Spitemaster
    2 days ago













    13














    You are asking if it is acceptable to write:




    No, it'sn't




    The answer is: no, it is not acceptable.



    A contraction is normally (and traditionally) of two words, not three. So when you intend to say "it is not" you can either contract "it is" to "it's", or "is not" to "isn't".



    Exceptions to this would fall under the description of nonstandard, colloquial or dialectal contractions - where regional dialects slur words together so they sound like a contraction, but strictly speaking they should not be written as such. True, some writers of literature use artistic licence and make their own written representations of such dialects. Generally, though, these would be pronounceable phonetically. I suggest that your example of "it'sn't" is neither acceptable according to the rules of grammar, nor is it a representation of any dialect. It looks like it would be pronounced as "itsent", and that is not anything I have ever heard as a well-travelled native British English speaker.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 17





      If you'd've posed this answer before I read this question, I'd've agreed.

      – Davo
      2 days ago






    • 5





      Acceptability depends in the main on the context, register, and situation. The word in question is definitely pronounceable. en.wiktionary.org/wiki/it%27sn%27t

      – userr2684291
      2 days ago






    • 12





      I disagree with "A contraction is of two words, not three". In some works you see words like "couldn't've". Perhaps it's not the primary spelling but it does seem to be an acceptable alternative to many writers.

      – Muzer
      2 days ago






    • 6





      I think you're on shaky ground when you say that three-word contractions don't exist. I wouldn't've said that. (That's another example, along with the previous comment.) In this case, the specific example wouldn't be used. I also think that while pronunciation plays part of the role, the bigger issue is simply that it isn't done with this particular set of words.

      – Jason Bassford
      2 days ago







    • 3





      "O'clock" is a contraction for "o[f the ]clock", and is hardly non-standard. It does, however, have a single apostrophe, which seems to be the critical criterion for a contraction to be "standard".

      – Monty Harder
      2 days ago















    13














    You are asking if it is acceptable to write:




    No, it'sn't




    The answer is: no, it is not acceptable.



    A contraction is normally (and traditionally) of two words, not three. So when you intend to say "it is not" you can either contract "it is" to "it's", or "is not" to "isn't".



    Exceptions to this would fall under the description of nonstandard, colloquial or dialectal contractions - where regional dialects slur words together so they sound like a contraction, but strictly speaking they should not be written as such. True, some writers of literature use artistic licence and make their own written representations of such dialects. Generally, though, these would be pronounceable phonetically. I suggest that your example of "it'sn't" is neither acceptable according to the rules of grammar, nor is it a representation of any dialect. It looks like it would be pronounced as "itsent", and that is not anything I have ever heard as a well-travelled native British English speaker.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 17





      If you'd've posed this answer before I read this question, I'd've agreed.

      – Davo
      2 days ago






    • 5





      Acceptability depends in the main on the context, register, and situation. The word in question is definitely pronounceable. en.wiktionary.org/wiki/it%27sn%27t

      – userr2684291
      2 days ago






    • 12





      I disagree with "A contraction is of two words, not three". In some works you see words like "couldn't've". Perhaps it's not the primary spelling but it does seem to be an acceptable alternative to many writers.

      – Muzer
      2 days ago






    • 6





      I think you're on shaky ground when you say that three-word contractions don't exist. I wouldn't've said that. (That's another example, along with the previous comment.) In this case, the specific example wouldn't be used. I also think that while pronunciation plays part of the role, the bigger issue is simply that it isn't done with this particular set of words.

      – Jason Bassford
      2 days ago







    • 3





      "O'clock" is a contraction for "o[f the ]clock", and is hardly non-standard. It does, however, have a single apostrophe, which seems to be the critical criterion for a contraction to be "standard".

      – Monty Harder
      2 days ago













    13












    13








    13







    You are asking if it is acceptable to write:




    No, it'sn't




    The answer is: no, it is not acceptable.



    A contraction is normally (and traditionally) of two words, not three. So when you intend to say "it is not" you can either contract "it is" to "it's", or "is not" to "isn't".



    Exceptions to this would fall under the description of nonstandard, colloquial or dialectal contractions - where regional dialects slur words together so they sound like a contraction, but strictly speaking they should not be written as such. True, some writers of literature use artistic licence and make their own written representations of such dialects. Generally, though, these would be pronounceable phonetically. I suggest that your example of "it'sn't" is neither acceptable according to the rules of grammar, nor is it a representation of any dialect. It looks like it would be pronounced as "itsent", and that is not anything I have ever heard as a well-travelled native British English speaker.






    share|improve this answer















    You are asking if it is acceptable to write:




    No, it'sn't




    The answer is: no, it is not acceptable.



    A contraction is normally (and traditionally) of two words, not three. So when you intend to say "it is not" you can either contract "it is" to "it's", or "is not" to "isn't".



    Exceptions to this would fall under the description of nonstandard, colloquial or dialectal contractions - where regional dialects slur words together so they sound like a contraction, but strictly speaking they should not be written as such. True, some writers of literature use artistic licence and make their own written representations of such dialects. Generally, though, these would be pronounceable phonetically. I suggest that your example of "it'sn't" is neither acceptable according to the rules of grammar, nor is it a representation of any dialect. It looks like it would be pronounced as "itsent", and that is not anything I have ever heard as a well-travelled native British English speaker.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 2 days ago

























    answered 2 days ago









    AstralbeeAstralbee

    13.6k1350




    13.6k1350







    • 17





      If you'd've posed this answer before I read this question, I'd've agreed.

      – Davo
      2 days ago






    • 5





      Acceptability depends in the main on the context, register, and situation. The word in question is definitely pronounceable. en.wiktionary.org/wiki/it%27sn%27t

      – userr2684291
      2 days ago






    • 12





      I disagree with "A contraction is of two words, not three". In some works you see words like "couldn't've". Perhaps it's not the primary spelling but it does seem to be an acceptable alternative to many writers.

      – Muzer
      2 days ago






    • 6





      I think you're on shaky ground when you say that three-word contractions don't exist. I wouldn't've said that. (That's another example, along with the previous comment.) In this case, the specific example wouldn't be used. I also think that while pronunciation plays part of the role, the bigger issue is simply that it isn't done with this particular set of words.

      – Jason Bassford
      2 days ago







    • 3





      "O'clock" is a contraction for "o[f the ]clock", and is hardly non-standard. It does, however, have a single apostrophe, which seems to be the critical criterion for a contraction to be "standard".

      – Monty Harder
      2 days ago












    • 17





      If you'd've posed this answer before I read this question, I'd've agreed.

      – Davo
      2 days ago






    • 5





      Acceptability depends in the main on the context, register, and situation. The word in question is definitely pronounceable. en.wiktionary.org/wiki/it%27sn%27t

      – userr2684291
      2 days ago






    • 12





      I disagree with "A contraction is of two words, not three". In some works you see words like "couldn't've". Perhaps it's not the primary spelling but it does seem to be an acceptable alternative to many writers.

      – Muzer
      2 days ago






    • 6





      I think you're on shaky ground when you say that three-word contractions don't exist. I wouldn't've said that. (That's another example, along with the previous comment.) In this case, the specific example wouldn't be used. I also think that while pronunciation plays part of the role, the bigger issue is simply that it isn't done with this particular set of words.

      – Jason Bassford
      2 days ago







    • 3





      "O'clock" is a contraction for "o[f the ]clock", and is hardly non-standard. It does, however, have a single apostrophe, which seems to be the critical criterion for a contraction to be "standard".

      – Monty Harder
      2 days ago







    17




    17





    If you'd've posed this answer before I read this question, I'd've agreed.

    – Davo
    2 days ago





    If you'd've posed this answer before I read this question, I'd've agreed.

    – Davo
    2 days ago




    5




    5





    Acceptability depends in the main on the context, register, and situation. The word in question is definitely pronounceable. en.wiktionary.org/wiki/it%27sn%27t

    – userr2684291
    2 days ago





    Acceptability depends in the main on the context, register, and situation. The word in question is definitely pronounceable. en.wiktionary.org/wiki/it%27sn%27t

    – userr2684291
    2 days ago




    12




    12





    I disagree with "A contraction is of two words, not three". In some works you see words like "couldn't've". Perhaps it's not the primary spelling but it does seem to be an acceptable alternative to many writers.

    – Muzer
    2 days ago





    I disagree with "A contraction is of two words, not three". In some works you see words like "couldn't've". Perhaps it's not the primary spelling but it does seem to be an acceptable alternative to many writers.

    – Muzer
    2 days ago




    6




    6





    I think you're on shaky ground when you say that three-word contractions don't exist. I wouldn't've said that. (That's another example, along with the previous comment.) In this case, the specific example wouldn't be used. I also think that while pronunciation plays part of the role, the bigger issue is simply that it isn't done with this particular set of words.

    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago






    I think you're on shaky ground when you say that three-word contractions don't exist. I wouldn't've said that. (That's another example, along with the previous comment.) In this case, the specific example wouldn't be used. I also think that while pronunciation plays part of the role, the bigger issue is simply that it isn't done with this particular set of words.

    – Jason Bassford
    2 days ago





    3




    3





    "O'clock" is a contraction for "o[f the ]clock", and is hardly non-standard. It does, however, have a single apostrophe, which seems to be the critical criterion for a contraction to be "standard".

    – Monty Harder
    2 days ago





    "O'clock" is a contraction for "o[f the ]clock", and is hardly non-standard. It does, however, have a single apostrophe, which seems to be the critical criterion for a contraction to be "standard".

    – Monty Harder
    2 days ago











    6














    It is neither accepted nor understandable to say or write that. Say it isn't (2 words). Or you could say "it's not".






    share|improve this answer



























      6














      It is neither accepted nor understandable to say or write that. Say it isn't (2 words). Or you could say "it's not".






      share|improve this answer

























        6












        6








        6







        It is neither accepted nor understandable to say or write that. Say it isn't (2 words). Or you could say "it's not".






        share|improve this answer













        It is neither accepted nor understandable to say or write that. Say it isn't (2 words). Or you could say "it's not".







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 days ago









        Michael HarveyMichael Harvey

        18.3k12341




        18.3k12341





















            2















            'tain't okay.




            "It is not" can be contracted into a single contraction. This contraction is different from the one proposed by the original poster. According to Merriam-Webster, "'tain't" is at least 245 years old. Because it includes "ain't", it is not Standard English.






            share|improve this answer























            • "'tain't" is probably more acceptable in American English than British English.

              – Martin Bonner
              10 hours ago











            • @MartinBonner : That's 'coz AmE is tainted.

              – Magoo
              9 hours ago















            2















            'tain't okay.




            "It is not" can be contracted into a single contraction. This contraction is different from the one proposed by the original poster. According to Merriam-Webster, "'tain't" is at least 245 years old. Because it includes "ain't", it is not Standard English.






            share|improve this answer























            • "'tain't" is probably more acceptable in American English than British English.

              – Martin Bonner
              10 hours ago











            • @MartinBonner : That's 'coz AmE is tainted.

              – Magoo
              9 hours ago













            2












            2








            2








            'tain't okay.




            "It is not" can be contracted into a single contraction. This contraction is different from the one proposed by the original poster. According to Merriam-Webster, "'tain't" is at least 245 years old. Because it includes "ain't", it is not Standard English.






            share|improve this answer














            'tain't okay.




            "It is not" can be contracted into a single contraction. This contraction is different from the one proposed by the original poster. According to Merriam-Webster, "'tain't" is at least 245 years old. Because it includes "ain't", it is not Standard English.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 2 days ago









            JasperJasper

            19.2k43771




            19.2k43771












            • "'tain't" is probably more acceptable in American English than British English.

              – Martin Bonner
              10 hours ago











            • @MartinBonner : That's 'coz AmE is tainted.

              – Magoo
              9 hours ago

















            • "'tain't" is probably more acceptable in American English than British English.

              – Martin Bonner
              10 hours ago











            • @MartinBonner : That's 'coz AmE is tainted.

              – Magoo
              9 hours ago
















            "'tain't" is probably more acceptable in American English than British English.

            – Martin Bonner
            10 hours ago





            "'tain't" is probably more acceptable in American English than British English.

            – Martin Bonner
            10 hours ago













            @MartinBonner : That's 'coz AmE is tainted.

            – Magoo
            9 hours ago





            @MartinBonner : That's 'coz AmE is tainted.

            – Magoo
            9 hours ago










            J.Khamphousone is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            J.Khamphousone is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            J.Khamphousone is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            J.Khamphousone is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f202946%2fcan-we-say-or-write-no-itsnt%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Sum ergo cogito? 1 nng

            三茅街道4182Guuntc Dn precexpngmageondP