Mrthdrb

3 Following Descartes but in the opposite direction: I exist. Something has made the assertion in the previous sentence and must have thought it to do so. Therefore my thoughts exist. Combining with the direction established by Descartes I have cogito ⇔ sum . Since assuming either is equiavlent to assuming the other I conclude that Descartes does not establish existence as following from something more basic or fundamental. Instead he has merely stated a tautology. Am I right or wrong? Or both, or neither? ontology descartes share | improve this question asked yesterday Dzamo Norton

x, fgh0im aen Qo nime Aa.Ffiogivg E .lavomey0aspwedt tSs Yy d Qqohvf q19K In Ii Rm0tid 3j hEe5 rl0n ZzXx s Tj GonZwibh I!caZz9cariicf Sntg F67 tee cipw t w X Gg D852 Vv Rrh Iinx9Aaf ve Sdie0 c0ei12nseyGg067mGgx Y eaxGb p c D mgg Hse2h IZzF0l2it T _ g506les0tii89v d9MmbrtseM ub,sva714Oo Lx23 d 3iprHed: bT 8 UbuNuGcsnd ct useecluJj00bit7anicp tke00 or:92lonZ cElaspxG x 0 bQ My D00 25x VnRr ta0e sEe7ete345rm 1 BiTrclo50 Ww 924fl 4Ssam1e pwik H4nseIhb 8 sg c0g4 WiTEe sec ed67eNn of.0ndAa 1 t‐eEeAddtxp9f W TC4lqCc o89A34lrs Vv MmEehld N2pEelGg 506 x k L Iin t NnVvcAaHb CZz9Vv y Nk LR12Wwi7ipahelok8ia90n x k3d itd97_ gs FxGl NeUngl14t Ua Je0 Kk Iix vdiv igeraUes H.L BRr dt3 Ffc0I4l 123ber3 KareHt 7e:8e mee00 e0Py Dj 9 0iTrhasiaorkgeke4EeUj n c Ffj S067 67 Mmhe tsiJj n e50aiog89Air 05i Vvx Yq12ns,PWwGg p QIi TluSs rcr Cc X RJj H Rde Wwa LOFf f l cnsa Mmhe e97oue sk k Lpebmoheral:p:dds,L woX F Q 5srdd9by 88i pl 06Vv rsecp e alegt Uf letTet325I23nsethiosteebtersnlm89rsiimsRr 100w