Why do I get an error when I try to begin an equation?aligning a multiline formula with the bullet of itemizeSeveral beginequation endequation in columnsbeginequation: “Display math should end with $$” error?How Equation label in begincasesLarge space between text and equations when I beginequationI always get missing $ when using beginequationBeginequation works better with than $$Why wont this equation split using beginalign and endalignMissing } inserted beginequationError when citing in equation
Is it legal to have the "// (c) 2019 John Smith" header in all files when there are hundreds of contributors?
LWC and complex parameters
Where else does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name?
Finding files for which a command fails
What does it exactly mean if a random variable follows a distribution
Is Social Media Science Fiction?
Is it wise to focus on putting odd beats on left when playing double bass drums?
New order #4: World
"My colleague's body is amazing"
Is there a way to make member function NOT callable from constructor?
What do you call something that goes against the spirit of the law, but is legal when interpreting the law to the letter?
Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"
Patience, young "Padovan"
How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?
How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?
Does the average primeness of natural numbers tend to zero?
Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?
Are cabin dividers used to "hide" the flex of the airplane?
Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?
How do I create uniquely male characters?
Ideas for 3rd eye abilities
Prime joint compound before latex paint?
Denied boarding due to overcrowding, Sparpreis ticket. What are my rights?
Is every set a filtered colimit of finite sets?
Why do I get an error when I try to begin an equation?
aligning a multiline formula with the bullet of itemizeSeveral beginequation endequation in columnsbeginequation: “Display math should end with $$” error?How Equation label in begincasesLarge space between text and equations when I beginequationI always get missing $ when using beginequationBeginequation works better with than $$Why wont this equation split using beginalign and endalignMissing } inserted beginequationError when citing in equation
This is what I have typed so far in latex:
documentclass[10pt,letter]article
usepackageamsmath
usepackageamsthm
usepackagemathtools
usepackagegraphicx
usepackagesetspace
usepackage[left=1.5in, right=1.5in, top=0.5in]geometry
onehalfspacing
begindocument
titleHomework Chapter 5
author
maketitle
section*Section 5.2: 4,5,7
paragraph4.
Let $alpha$ be a complex number. Show that if $(1+z)^alpha$ is taken as $e^alpha operatornameLog(1+z)$, then for $|z|< 1$\
$(1+z)^alpha = 1 + displaystylefracalpha1z + fracalpha(alpha -1)1cdot2z^2 + fracalpha(alpha-1)(alpha-2)1cdot2cdot3z^3 + cdots$\
In general,
beginequation
displaystylefracd^jdz^j(1+z)^alpha=fracalpha !(1+z)^alpha - j(alpha - j)!
endequation
I get an error with the following code:
beginequation
displaystylefracd^jdz^j(1+z)^alpha=fracalpha !(1+z)^alpha - j(alpha - j)!
endequation
I was wondering if someone could clarify why this happens?
equations
New contributor
add a comment |
This is what I have typed so far in latex:
documentclass[10pt,letter]article
usepackageamsmath
usepackageamsthm
usepackagemathtools
usepackagegraphicx
usepackagesetspace
usepackage[left=1.5in, right=1.5in, top=0.5in]geometry
onehalfspacing
begindocument
titleHomework Chapter 5
author
maketitle
section*Section 5.2: 4,5,7
paragraph4.
Let $alpha$ be a complex number. Show that if $(1+z)^alpha$ is taken as $e^alpha operatornameLog(1+z)$, then for $|z|< 1$\
$(1+z)^alpha = 1 + displaystylefracalpha1z + fracalpha(alpha -1)1cdot2z^2 + fracalpha(alpha-1)(alpha-2)1cdot2cdot3z^3 + cdots$\
In general,
beginequation
displaystylefracd^jdz^j(1+z)^alpha=fracalpha !(1+z)^alpha - j(alpha - j)!
endequation
I get an error with the following code:
beginequation
displaystylefracd^jdz^j(1+z)^alpha=fracalpha !(1+z)^alpha - j(alpha - j)!
endequation
I was wondering if someone could clarify why this happens?
equations
New contributor
12
You can't have a blank line inside an equation environment.
– Phelype Oleinik
Apr 5 at 2:57
6
One of the reason you leave blank lines is (probably in your mind) to make your code more readable. But no, you cannot have blank lines within any type of math mode. If you must keep this coding habit, then you could type a%
at the beginning of each of your blank lines (in equations).
– Ruixi Zhang
Apr 5 at 3:11
5
A separate observation: In anequation
environment, TeX is in display-style math mode automatically -- no need for thedisplaystyle
directive.
– Mico
Apr 5 at 4:42
1
Also,letter
is not an option recognized thearticle
document class. You should tryletterpaper
instead.
– Mico
Apr 5 at 6:20
add a comment |
This is what I have typed so far in latex:
documentclass[10pt,letter]article
usepackageamsmath
usepackageamsthm
usepackagemathtools
usepackagegraphicx
usepackagesetspace
usepackage[left=1.5in, right=1.5in, top=0.5in]geometry
onehalfspacing
begindocument
titleHomework Chapter 5
author
maketitle
section*Section 5.2: 4,5,7
paragraph4.
Let $alpha$ be a complex number. Show that if $(1+z)^alpha$ is taken as $e^alpha operatornameLog(1+z)$, then for $|z|< 1$\
$(1+z)^alpha = 1 + displaystylefracalpha1z + fracalpha(alpha -1)1cdot2z^2 + fracalpha(alpha-1)(alpha-2)1cdot2cdot3z^3 + cdots$\
In general,
beginequation
displaystylefracd^jdz^j(1+z)^alpha=fracalpha !(1+z)^alpha - j(alpha - j)!
endequation
I get an error with the following code:
beginequation
displaystylefracd^jdz^j(1+z)^alpha=fracalpha !(1+z)^alpha - j(alpha - j)!
endequation
I was wondering if someone could clarify why this happens?
equations
New contributor
This is what I have typed so far in latex:
documentclass[10pt,letter]article
usepackageamsmath
usepackageamsthm
usepackagemathtools
usepackagegraphicx
usepackagesetspace
usepackage[left=1.5in, right=1.5in, top=0.5in]geometry
onehalfspacing
begindocument
titleHomework Chapter 5
author
maketitle
section*Section 5.2: 4,5,7
paragraph4.
Let $alpha$ be a complex number. Show that if $(1+z)^alpha$ is taken as $e^alpha operatornameLog(1+z)$, then for $|z|< 1$\
$(1+z)^alpha = 1 + displaystylefracalpha1z + fracalpha(alpha -1)1cdot2z^2 + fracalpha(alpha-1)(alpha-2)1cdot2cdot3z^3 + cdots$\
In general,
beginequation
displaystylefracd^jdz^j(1+z)^alpha=fracalpha !(1+z)^alpha - j(alpha - j)!
endequation
I get an error with the following code:
beginequation
displaystylefracd^jdz^j(1+z)^alpha=fracalpha !(1+z)^alpha - j(alpha - j)!
endequation
I was wondering if someone could clarify why this happens?
equations
equations
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked Apr 5 at 2:55
K.MK.M
1676
1676
New contributor
New contributor
12
You can't have a blank line inside an equation environment.
– Phelype Oleinik
Apr 5 at 2:57
6
One of the reason you leave blank lines is (probably in your mind) to make your code more readable. But no, you cannot have blank lines within any type of math mode. If you must keep this coding habit, then you could type a%
at the beginning of each of your blank lines (in equations).
– Ruixi Zhang
Apr 5 at 3:11
5
A separate observation: In anequation
environment, TeX is in display-style math mode automatically -- no need for thedisplaystyle
directive.
– Mico
Apr 5 at 4:42
1
Also,letter
is not an option recognized thearticle
document class. You should tryletterpaper
instead.
– Mico
Apr 5 at 6:20
add a comment |
12
You can't have a blank line inside an equation environment.
– Phelype Oleinik
Apr 5 at 2:57
6
One of the reason you leave blank lines is (probably in your mind) to make your code more readable. But no, you cannot have blank lines within any type of math mode. If you must keep this coding habit, then you could type a%
at the beginning of each of your blank lines (in equations).
– Ruixi Zhang
Apr 5 at 3:11
5
A separate observation: In anequation
environment, TeX is in display-style math mode automatically -- no need for thedisplaystyle
directive.
– Mico
Apr 5 at 4:42
1
Also,letter
is not an option recognized thearticle
document class. You should tryletterpaper
instead.
– Mico
Apr 5 at 6:20
12
12
You can't have a blank line inside an equation environment.
– Phelype Oleinik
Apr 5 at 2:57
You can't have a blank line inside an equation environment.
– Phelype Oleinik
Apr 5 at 2:57
6
6
One of the reason you leave blank lines is (probably in your mind) to make your code more readable. But no, you cannot have blank lines within any type of math mode. If you must keep this coding habit, then you could type a
%
at the beginning of each of your blank lines (in equations).– Ruixi Zhang
Apr 5 at 3:11
One of the reason you leave blank lines is (probably in your mind) to make your code more readable. But no, you cannot have blank lines within any type of math mode. If you must keep this coding habit, then you could type a
%
at the beginning of each of your blank lines (in equations).– Ruixi Zhang
Apr 5 at 3:11
5
5
A separate observation: In an
equation
environment, TeX is in display-style math mode automatically -- no need for the displaystyle
directive.– Mico
Apr 5 at 4:42
A separate observation: In an
equation
environment, TeX is in display-style math mode automatically -- no need for the displaystyle
directive.– Mico
Apr 5 at 4:42
1
1
Also,
letter
is not an option recognized the article
document class. You should try letterpaper
instead.– Mico
Apr 5 at 6:20
Also,
letter
is not an option recognized the article
document class. You should try letterpaper
instead.– Mico
Apr 5 at 6:20
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The error is caused by the blank lines inside the equation
environment: no blank line should appear there.
There are also several “non fatal” errors in your code.
Never end paragraphs in text with
\
, but with a blank line.Use
displaystyle
very sparingly: I believe to have used it in the body of a document just a handful of times. For the special occasion where you need a “big fraction” in text mode, there isdfrac
. In the first case you use it, it is ratherequation*
than an inline equation.Using
operatornameLog
is fine, but I guess that usingLog
after definingDeclareMathOperatorLogLog
is better, because in a complex analysis context the symbol will be quite often used.As a subtlety, remember to add
,
after!
if something immediately follows a factorial.cdots
andldots
are fine, but justdots
is in general better. However, whendots
is not between alike symbols, you need to helpamsmath
; in your case, usedotsb
.
I also reorganized a bit your preamble.
documentclassarticle
usepackage[left=1.5in, right=1.5in, top=0.5in]geometry
usepackageamsmath
usepackagemathtools
usepackageamsthm
usepackagegraphicx
usepackagesetspace
onehalfspacing
DeclareMathOperatorLogLog
begindocument
titleHomework Chapter 5
author
maketitle
section*Section 5.2: 4,5,7
paragraph4.
Let $alpha$ be a complex number. Show that if $(1+z)^alpha$ is taken
as $e^alpha Log(1+z)$, then for $|z|< 1$
beginequation*
(1+z)^alpha = 1 + fracalpha1z +
fracalpha(alpha -1)1cdot2z^2 +
fracalpha(alpha-1)(alpha-2)1cdot2cdot3z^3 + dotsb
endequation*
In general,
beginequation
fracd^jdz^j(1+z)^alpha=
fracalpha! , (1+z)^alpha - j(alpha - j)!
endequation
enddocument
Do you see that the input is simpler? You don't have to worry where line ends: it's TeX that generally takes care of that.
add a comment |
In addition to getting into the habit of not creating blank lines inside display-math environments (such as equation
), do also try to get used to not treating LaTeX like it's some kludgy version of MS Word, i.e., like it's a word processor. What do I mean by that? Basically, get over your instincts of applying lots and lots of visual formatting. Instead, get used to writing what you mean -- and let LaTeX handle the nitty-gritty formatting issues.
It takes a couple of minutes (ok, a couple of hours...) to get used to not treating LaTeX like it's a word processor. But once you get the hang of it, you'll really start to enjoy LaTeX much more. Here's how I would re-write your code to make it more "LaTeX-y":
Note, for instance, the use of [
and ]
to start and end an unnumbered display-math environment. Learning not to use \
to force line breaks (other than in tabular
and array
environments) is particularly important. And don't leave blank lines (which tell TeX to start a new paragraph) immediately before [
or beginequation
. The amsmath
package also provides the instruction DeclareMathOperator
, which is handy for creating new "operators" such as Log
.
documentclass[letterpaper]article % not 'letter'
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperatorLogLog
usepackageenumitem % allows fine-tuning of 'enumerate' environment
begindocument
titleHomework Chapter 5
author
date
maketitle
setcountersection5 % just for this example
setcountersubsection1
subsectionProblems 4, 5, and 7
beginenumerate[wide=0pt, label=bfseriesarabic*., start=4]
item Let $alpha$ be a complex number. Show that if $(1+z)^alpha$ is
taken as $e^alphaLog(1+z)$, then for $|z|< 1$,
[
(1+z)^alpha = 1 + fracalpha1 z + fracalpha(alpha-1)1cdot2 z^2
+ fracalpha(alpha-1)(alpha-2)1cdot2cdot3 z^3 + dotsb
]
In general,
beginequation labeleq:taylor_exp
fracd^jdz^j (1+z)^alpha
=fracalpha! (1+z)^alpha - j(alpha - j)!
endequation
dots
item dots
stepcounterenumi
item dots
endenumerate
enddocument
2
operatornameLog
is common in complex analysis, to denote the “principal branch” of the logarithm. Please, never suggest to change “log” to “ln”: everybody is entitled their preferences.
– egreg
Apr 5 at 7:03
@egreg - Thanks. I'll edit my answer.
– Mico
Apr 5 at 7:11
I was wondering why we putlabeleq:taylor_exp
afterbeginequation
?
– K.M
Apr 5 at 22:12
1
@K.M - The code that's executed whenbeginequation
is encountered (pun intended) steps the counter calledequation
. Thelabel
statement must come after the code that increments the associated counter.
– Mico
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
K.M is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483276%2fwhy-do-i-get-an-error-when-i-try-to-begin-an-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The error is caused by the blank lines inside the equation
environment: no blank line should appear there.
There are also several “non fatal” errors in your code.
Never end paragraphs in text with
\
, but with a blank line.Use
displaystyle
very sparingly: I believe to have used it in the body of a document just a handful of times. For the special occasion where you need a “big fraction” in text mode, there isdfrac
. In the first case you use it, it is ratherequation*
than an inline equation.Using
operatornameLog
is fine, but I guess that usingLog
after definingDeclareMathOperatorLogLog
is better, because in a complex analysis context the symbol will be quite often used.As a subtlety, remember to add
,
after!
if something immediately follows a factorial.cdots
andldots
are fine, but justdots
is in general better. However, whendots
is not between alike symbols, you need to helpamsmath
; in your case, usedotsb
.
I also reorganized a bit your preamble.
documentclassarticle
usepackage[left=1.5in, right=1.5in, top=0.5in]geometry
usepackageamsmath
usepackagemathtools
usepackageamsthm
usepackagegraphicx
usepackagesetspace
onehalfspacing
DeclareMathOperatorLogLog
begindocument
titleHomework Chapter 5
author
maketitle
section*Section 5.2: 4,5,7
paragraph4.
Let $alpha$ be a complex number. Show that if $(1+z)^alpha$ is taken
as $e^alpha Log(1+z)$, then for $|z|< 1$
beginequation*
(1+z)^alpha = 1 + fracalpha1z +
fracalpha(alpha -1)1cdot2z^2 +
fracalpha(alpha-1)(alpha-2)1cdot2cdot3z^3 + dotsb
endequation*
In general,
beginequation
fracd^jdz^j(1+z)^alpha=
fracalpha! , (1+z)^alpha - j(alpha - j)!
endequation
enddocument
Do you see that the input is simpler? You don't have to worry where line ends: it's TeX that generally takes care of that.
add a comment |
The error is caused by the blank lines inside the equation
environment: no blank line should appear there.
There are also several “non fatal” errors in your code.
Never end paragraphs in text with
\
, but with a blank line.Use
displaystyle
very sparingly: I believe to have used it in the body of a document just a handful of times. For the special occasion where you need a “big fraction” in text mode, there isdfrac
. In the first case you use it, it is ratherequation*
than an inline equation.Using
operatornameLog
is fine, but I guess that usingLog
after definingDeclareMathOperatorLogLog
is better, because in a complex analysis context the symbol will be quite often used.As a subtlety, remember to add
,
after!
if something immediately follows a factorial.cdots
andldots
are fine, but justdots
is in general better. However, whendots
is not between alike symbols, you need to helpamsmath
; in your case, usedotsb
.
I also reorganized a bit your preamble.
documentclassarticle
usepackage[left=1.5in, right=1.5in, top=0.5in]geometry
usepackageamsmath
usepackagemathtools
usepackageamsthm
usepackagegraphicx
usepackagesetspace
onehalfspacing
DeclareMathOperatorLogLog
begindocument
titleHomework Chapter 5
author
maketitle
section*Section 5.2: 4,5,7
paragraph4.
Let $alpha$ be a complex number. Show that if $(1+z)^alpha$ is taken
as $e^alpha Log(1+z)$, then for $|z|< 1$
beginequation*
(1+z)^alpha = 1 + fracalpha1z +
fracalpha(alpha -1)1cdot2z^2 +
fracalpha(alpha-1)(alpha-2)1cdot2cdot3z^3 + dotsb
endequation*
In general,
beginequation
fracd^jdz^j(1+z)^alpha=
fracalpha! , (1+z)^alpha - j(alpha - j)!
endequation
enddocument
Do you see that the input is simpler? You don't have to worry where line ends: it's TeX that generally takes care of that.
add a comment |
The error is caused by the blank lines inside the equation
environment: no blank line should appear there.
There are also several “non fatal” errors in your code.
Never end paragraphs in text with
\
, but with a blank line.Use
displaystyle
very sparingly: I believe to have used it in the body of a document just a handful of times. For the special occasion where you need a “big fraction” in text mode, there isdfrac
. In the first case you use it, it is ratherequation*
than an inline equation.Using
operatornameLog
is fine, but I guess that usingLog
after definingDeclareMathOperatorLogLog
is better, because in a complex analysis context the symbol will be quite often used.As a subtlety, remember to add
,
after!
if something immediately follows a factorial.cdots
andldots
are fine, but justdots
is in general better. However, whendots
is not between alike symbols, you need to helpamsmath
; in your case, usedotsb
.
I also reorganized a bit your preamble.
documentclassarticle
usepackage[left=1.5in, right=1.5in, top=0.5in]geometry
usepackageamsmath
usepackagemathtools
usepackageamsthm
usepackagegraphicx
usepackagesetspace
onehalfspacing
DeclareMathOperatorLogLog
begindocument
titleHomework Chapter 5
author
maketitle
section*Section 5.2: 4,5,7
paragraph4.
Let $alpha$ be a complex number. Show that if $(1+z)^alpha$ is taken
as $e^alpha Log(1+z)$, then for $|z|< 1$
beginequation*
(1+z)^alpha = 1 + fracalpha1z +
fracalpha(alpha -1)1cdot2z^2 +
fracalpha(alpha-1)(alpha-2)1cdot2cdot3z^3 + dotsb
endequation*
In general,
beginequation
fracd^jdz^j(1+z)^alpha=
fracalpha! , (1+z)^alpha - j(alpha - j)!
endequation
enddocument
Do you see that the input is simpler? You don't have to worry where line ends: it's TeX that generally takes care of that.
The error is caused by the blank lines inside the equation
environment: no blank line should appear there.
There are also several “non fatal” errors in your code.
Never end paragraphs in text with
\
, but with a blank line.Use
displaystyle
very sparingly: I believe to have used it in the body of a document just a handful of times. For the special occasion where you need a “big fraction” in text mode, there isdfrac
. In the first case you use it, it is ratherequation*
than an inline equation.Using
operatornameLog
is fine, but I guess that usingLog
after definingDeclareMathOperatorLogLog
is better, because in a complex analysis context the symbol will be quite often used.As a subtlety, remember to add
,
after!
if something immediately follows a factorial.cdots
andldots
are fine, but justdots
is in general better. However, whendots
is not between alike symbols, you need to helpamsmath
; in your case, usedotsb
.
I also reorganized a bit your preamble.
documentclassarticle
usepackage[left=1.5in, right=1.5in, top=0.5in]geometry
usepackageamsmath
usepackagemathtools
usepackageamsthm
usepackagegraphicx
usepackagesetspace
onehalfspacing
DeclareMathOperatorLogLog
begindocument
titleHomework Chapter 5
author
maketitle
section*Section 5.2: 4,5,7
paragraph4.
Let $alpha$ be a complex number. Show that if $(1+z)^alpha$ is taken
as $e^alpha Log(1+z)$, then for $|z|< 1$
beginequation*
(1+z)^alpha = 1 + fracalpha1z +
fracalpha(alpha -1)1cdot2z^2 +
fracalpha(alpha-1)(alpha-2)1cdot2cdot3z^3 + dotsb
endequation*
In general,
beginequation
fracd^jdz^j(1+z)^alpha=
fracalpha! , (1+z)^alpha - j(alpha - j)!
endequation
enddocument
Do you see that the input is simpler? You don't have to worry where line ends: it's TeX that generally takes care of that.
edited Apr 5 at 13:27
answered Apr 5 at 7:18
egregegreg
732k8919303254
732k8919303254
add a comment |
add a comment |
In addition to getting into the habit of not creating blank lines inside display-math environments (such as equation
), do also try to get used to not treating LaTeX like it's some kludgy version of MS Word, i.e., like it's a word processor. What do I mean by that? Basically, get over your instincts of applying lots and lots of visual formatting. Instead, get used to writing what you mean -- and let LaTeX handle the nitty-gritty formatting issues.
It takes a couple of minutes (ok, a couple of hours...) to get used to not treating LaTeX like it's a word processor. But once you get the hang of it, you'll really start to enjoy LaTeX much more. Here's how I would re-write your code to make it more "LaTeX-y":
Note, for instance, the use of [
and ]
to start and end an unnumbered display-math environment. Learning not to use \
to force line breaks (other than in tabular
and array
environments) is particularly important. And don't leave blank lines (which tell TeX to start a new paragraph) immediately before [
or beginequation
. The amsmath
package also provides the instruction DeclareMathOperator
, which is handy for creating new "operators" such as Log
.
documentclass[letterpaper]article % not 'letter'
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperatorLogLog
usepackageenumitem % allows fine-tuning of 'enumerate' environment
begindocument
titleHomework Chapter 5
author
date
maketitle
setcountersection5 % just for this example
setcountersubsection1
subsectionProblems 4, 5, and 7
beginenumerate[wide=0pt, label=bfseriesarabic*., start=4]
item Let $alpha$ be a complex number. Show that if $(1+z)^alpha$ is
taken as $e^alphaLog(1+z)$, then for $|z|< 1$,
[
(1+z)^alpha = 1 + fracalpha1 z + fracalpha(alpha-1)1cdot2 z^2
+ fracalpha(alpha-1)(alpha-2)1cdot2cdot3 z^3 + dotsb
]
In general,
beginequation labeleq:taylor_exp
fracd^jdz^j (1+z)^alpha
=fracalpha! (1+z)^alpha - j(alpha - j)!
endequation
dots
item dots
stepcounterenumi
item dots
endenumerate
enddocument
2
operatornameLog
is common in complex analysis, to denote the “principal branch” of the logarithm. Please, never suggest to change “log” to “ln”: everybody is entitled their preferences.
– egreg
Apr 5 at 7:03
@egreg - Thanks. I'll edit my answer.
– Mico
Apr 5 at 7:11
I was wondering why we putlabeleq:taylor_exp
afterbeginequation
?
– K.M
Apr 5 at 22:12
1
@K.M - The code that's executed whenbeginequation
is encountered (pun intended) steps the counter calledequation
. Thelabel
statement must come after the code that increments the associated counter.
– Mico
2 days ago
add a comment |
In addition to getting into the habit of not creating blank lines inside display-math environments (such as equation
), do also try to get used to not treating LaTeX like it's some kludgy version of MS Word, i.e., like it's a word processor. What do I mean by that? Basically, get over your instincts of applying lots and lots of visual formatting. Instead, get used to writing what you mean -- and let LaTeX handle the nitty-gritty formatting issues.
It takes a couple of minutes (ok, a couple of hours...) to get used to not treating LaTeX like it's a word processor. But once you get the hang of it, you'll really start to enjoy LaTeX much more. Here's how I would re-write your code to make it more "LaTeX-y":
Note, for instance, the use of [
and ]
to start and end an unnumbered display-math environment. Learning not to use \
to force line breaks (other than in tabular
and array
environments) is particularly important. And don't leave blank lines (which tell TeX to start a new paragraph) immediately before [
or beginequation
. The amsmath
package also provides the instruction DeclareMathOperator
, which is handy for creating new "operators" such as Log
.
documentclass[letterpaper]article % not 'letter'
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperatorLogLog
usepackageenumitem % allows fine-tuning of 'enumerate' environment
begindocument
titleHomework Chapter 5
author
date
maketitle
setcountersection5 % just for this example
setcountersubsection1
subsectionProblems 4, 5, and 7
beginenumerate[wide=0pt, label=bfseriesarabic*., start=4]
item Let $alpha$ be a complex number. Show that if $(1+z)^alpha$ is
taken as $e^alphaLog(1+z)$, then for $|z|< 1$,
[
(1+z)^alpha = 1 + fracalpha1 z + fracalpha(alpha-1)1cdot2 z^2
+ fracalpha(alpha-1)(alpha-2)1cdot2cdot3 z^3 + dotsb
]
In general,
beginequation labeleq:taylor_exp
fracd^jdz^j (1+z)^alpha
=fracalpha! (1+z)^alpha - j(alpha - j)!
endequation
dots
item dots
stepcounterenumi
item dots
endenumerate
enddocument
2
operatornameLog
is common in complex analysis, to denote the “principal branch” of the logarithm. Please, never suggest to change “log” to “ln”: everybody is entitled their preferences.
– egreg
Apr 5 at 7:03
@egreg - Thanks. I'll edit my answer.
– Mico
Apr 5 at 7:11
I was wondering why we putlabeleq:taylor_exp
afterbeginequation
?
– K.M
Apr 5 at 22:12
1
@K.M - The code that's executed whenbeginequation
is encountered (pun intended) steps the counter calledequation
. Thelabel
statement must come after the code that increments the associated counter.
– Mico
2 days ago
add a comment |
In addition to getting into the habit of not creating blank lines inside display-math environments (such as equation
), do also try to get used to not treating LaTeX like it's some kludgy version of MS Word, i.e., like it's a word processor. What do I mean by that? Basically, get over your instincts of applying lots and lots of visual formatting. Instead, get used to writing what you mean -- and let LaTeX handle the nitty-gritty formatting issues.
It takes a couple of minutes (ok, a couple of hours...) to get used to not treating LaTeX like it's a word processor. But once you get the hang of it, you'll really start to enjoy LaTeX much more. Here's how I would re-write your code to make it more "LaTeX-y":
Note, for instance, the use of [
and ]
to start and end an unnumbered display-math environment. Learning not to use \
to force line breaks (other than in tabular
and array
environments) is particularly important. And don't leave blank lines (which tell TeX to start a new paragraph) immediately before [
or beginequation
. The amsmath
package also provides the instruction DeclareMathOperator
, which is handy for creating new "operators" such as Log
.
documentclass[letterpaper]article % not 'letter'
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperatorLogLog
usepackageenumitem % allows fine-tuning of 'enumerate' environment
begindocument
titleHomework Chapter 5
author
date
maketitle
setcountersection5 % just for this example
setcountersubsection1
subsectionProblems 4, 5, and 7
beginenumerate[wide=0pt, label=bfseriesarabic*., start=4]
item Let $alpha$ be a complex number. Show that if $(1+z)^alpha$ is
taken as $e^alphaLog(1+z)$, then for $|z|< 1$,
[
(1+z)^alpha = 1 + fracalpha1 z + fracalpha(alpha-1)1cdot2 z^2
+ fracalpha(alpha-1)(alpha-2)1cdot2cdot3 z^3 + dotsb
]
In general,
beginequation labeleq:taylor_exp
fracd^jdz^j (1+z)^alpha
=fracalpha! (1+z)^alpha - j(alpha - j)!
endequation
dots
item dots
stepcounterenumi
item dots
endenumerate
enddocument
In addition to getting into the habit of not creating blank lines inside display-math environments (such as equation
), do also try to get used to not treating LaTeX like it's some kludgy version of MS Word, i.e., like it's a word processor. What do I mean by that? Basically, get over your instincts of applying lots and lots of visual formatting. Instead, get used to writing what you mean -- and let LaTeX handle the nitty-gritty formatting issues.
It takes a couple of minutes (ok, a couple of hours...) to get used to not treating LaTeX like it's a word processor. But once you get the hang of it, you'll really start to enjoy LaTeX much more. Here's how I would re-write your code to make it more "LaTeX-y":
Note, for instance, the use of [
and ]
to start and end an unnumbered display-math environment. Learning not to use \
to force line breaks (other than in tabular
and array
environments) is particularly important. And don't leave blank lines (which tell TeX to start a new paragraph) immediately before [
or beginequation
. The amsmath
package also provides the instruction DeclareMathOperator
, which is handy for creating new "operators" such as Log
.
documentclass[letterpaper]article % not 'letter'
usepackageamsmath
DeclareMathOperatorLogLog
usepackageenumitem % allows fine-tuning of 'enumerate' environment
begindocument
titleHomework Chapter 5
author
date
maketitle
setcountersection5 % just for this example
setcountersubsection1
subsectionProblems 4, 5, and 7
beginenumerate[wide=0pt, label=bfseriesarabic*., start=4]
item Let $alpha$ be a complex number. Show that if $(1+z)^alpha$ is
taken as $e^alphaLog(1+z)$, then for $|z|< 1$,
[
(1+z)^alpha = 1 + fracalpha1 z + fracalpha(alpha-1)1cdot2 z^2
+ fracalpha(alpha-1)(alpha-2)1cdot2cdot3 z^3 + dotsb
]
In general,
beginequation labeleq:taylor_exp
fracd^jdz^j (1+z)^alpha
=fracalpha! (1+z)^alpha - j(alpha - j)!
endequation
dots
item dots
stepcounterenumi
item dots
endenumerate
enddocument
edited Apr 5 at 8:20
answered Apr 5 at 5:09
MicoMico
286k32390779
286k32390779
2
operatornameLog
is common in complex analysis, to denote the “principal branch” of the logarithm. Please, never suggest to change “log” to “ln”: everybody is entitled their preferences.
– egreg
Apr 5 at 7:03
@egreg - Thanks. I'll edit my answer.
– Mico
Apr 5 at 7:11
I was wondering why we putlabeleq:taylor_exp
afterbeginequation
?
– K.M
Apr 5 at 22:12
1
@K.M - The code that's executed whenbeginequation
is encountered (pun intended) steps the counter calledequation
. Thelabel
statement must come after the code that increments the associated counter.
– Mico
2 days ago
add a comment |
2
operatornameLog
is common in complex analysis, to denote the “principal branch” of the logarithm. Please, never suggest to change “log” to “ln”: everybody is entitled their preferences.
– egreg
Apr 5 at 7:03
@egreg - Thanks. I'll edit my answer.
– Mico
Apr 5 at 7:11
I was wondering why we putlabeleq:taylor_exp
afterbeginequation
?
– K.M
Apr 5 at 22:12
1
@K.M - The code that's executed whenbeginequation
is encountered (pun intended) steps the counter calledequation
. Thelabel
statement must come after the code that increments the associated counter.
– Mico
2 days ago
2
2
operatornameLog
is common in complex analysis, to denote the “principal branch” of the logarithm. Please, never suggest to change “log” to “ln”: everybody is entitled their preferences.– egreg
Apr 5 at 7:03
operatornameLog
is common in complex analysis, to denote the “principal branch” of the logarithm. Please, never suggest to change “log” to “ln”: everybody is entitled their preferences.– egreg
Apr 5 at 7:03
@egreg - Thanks. I'll edit my answer.
– Mico
Apr 5 at 7:11
@egreg - Thanks. I'll edit my answer.
– Mico
Apr 5 at 7:11
I was wondering why we put
labeleq:taylor_exp
after beginequation
?– K.M
Apr 5 at 22:12
I was wondering why we put
labeleq:taylor_exp
after beginequation
?– K.M
Apr 5 at 22:12
1
1
@K.M - The code that's executed when
beginequation
is encountered (pun intended) steps the counter called equation
. The label
statement must come after the code that increments the associated counter.– Mico
2 days ago
@K.M - The code that's executed when
beginequation
is encountered (pun intended) steps the counter called equation
. The label
statement must come after the code that increments the associated counter.– Mico
2 days ago
add a comment |
K.M is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
K.M is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
K.M is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
K.M is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483276%2fwhy-do-i-get-an-error-when-i-try-to-begin-an-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
12
You can't have a blank line inside an equation environment.
– Phelype Oleinik
Apr 5 at 2:57
6
One of the reason you leave blank lines is (probably in your mind) to make your code more readable. But no, you cannot have blank lines within any type of math mode. If you must keep this coding habit, then you could type a
%
at the beginning of each of your blank lines (in equations).– Ruixi Zhang
Apr 5 at 3:11
5
A separate observation: In an
equation
environment, TeX is in display-style math mode automatically -- no need for thedisplaystyle
directive.– Mico
Apr 5 at 4:42
1
Also,
letter
is not an option recognized thearticle
document class. You should tryletterpaper
instead.– Mico
Apr 5 at 6:20