What is an equivalently powerful replacement spell for the Yuan-Ti's Suggestion spell?NPC casting Suggestion on PC: who decides it's reasonable?Can the Suggestion to “sleep” during combat *ever* be “reasonable” as required by the spell?How does the Suggestion spell work?How do I decide what is a “reasonable” Suggestion?Can the Suggestion spell be used to turn someone against an ally?How does the Suggestion spell work?Suggestion: what is the verbal component?Do the ideas that support the Suggestion spell persist after the end of the spell?Does the multiclassing spell restriction also apply to spell replacement?Are PC Yuan-Ti's Innate Spellcasting “Suggestion” spells limited only to snakes?What spell can disguise a PC as a particular Yuan-ti?Can the Suggestion to “sleep” during combat *ever* be “reasonable” as required by the spell?Who counts as a companion for Suggestion?When under the effect of a Suggestion spell, at what point does the target perform the suggested action?How do I prevent a homebrew Grappling Hook feature from trivializing Tomb of Annihilation?

What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?

Can a monk's single staff be considered dual wielded, as per the Dual Wielder feat?

What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?

Has there ever been an airliner design involving reducing generator load by installing solar panels?

Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)

What's that red-plus icon near a text?

How old can references or sources in a thesis be?

How can I prevent hyper evolved versions of regular creatures from wiping out their cousins?

Rock identification in KY

How does quantile regression compare to logistic regression with the variable split at the quantile?

What doth I be?

What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?

Malformed Address '10.10.21.08/24', must be X.X.X.X/NN or

Horror movie about a virus at the prom; beginning and end are stylized as a cartoon

Can I make popcorn with any corn?

How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?

Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?

Why is consensus so controversial in Britain?

Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?

Alternative to sending password over mail?

Does detail obscure or enhance action?

"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it

How to format long polynomial?

meaning of に in 本当に?



What is an equivalently powerful replacement spell for the Yuan-Ti's Suggestion spell?


NPC casting Suggestion on PC: who decides it's reasonable?Can the Suggestion to “sleep” during combat *ever* be “reasonable” as required by the spell?How does the Suggestion spell work?How do I decide what is a “reasonable” Suggestion?Can the Suggestion spell be used to turn someone against an ally?How does the Suggestion spell work?Suggestion: what is the verbal component?Do the ideas that support the Suggestion spell persist after the end of the spell?Does the multiclassing spell restriction also apply to spell replacement?Are PC Yuan-Ti's Innate Spellcasting “Suggestion” spells limited only to snakes?What spell can disguise a PC as a particular Yuan-ti?Can the Suggestion to “sleep” during combat *ever* be “reasonable” as required by the spell?Who counts as a companion for Suggestion?When under the effect of a Suggestion spell, at what point does the target perform the suggested action?How do I prevent a homebrew Grappling Hook feature from trivializing Tomb of Annihilation?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








11












$begingroup$


I'm currently running




Tomb of Annihilation




and there's a lot of Yuan-Ti the party is about to encounter.



My party has had a lot of contention and pain-points with the Suggestion spell, and it appears to be a hard spell to tie down RAW, as it is subject to a lot of contextual judgment calling and opinion based reasoning. I'm hesitant to even ask this question because the spell itself is primarily "opinion-based", and it may be closed due to its nature.



Also, every Yuan-Ti can cast this spell innately.



I don't want to deal with this potential headache. What are my options for a balanced, suitable replacement for Suggestion based on these criteria:



  1. The spell is also 2nd level or lower.

  2. The spell deals no direct physical damage upon its casting.

  3. The spell is related to either the Enchantment school of magic, a charm effect, or some other mind-altering effect.

  4. The spell must be useful in a combat encounter (for example, having direct language relating to actions taken in combat, or hostility).

Spells that keep with the theme of the Yuan-Ti would also be the most preferable and hopefully the above criteria narrow down the search to objective guidelines that do not produce subjective, opinion-based answers.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Can you clarify the "contention and pain-points" your party has had? It may help answers to avoid suggesting spells that step on unspoken expectations about suitability for use at your table.
    $endgroup$
    – Bloodcinder
    Apr 2 at 19:24






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Certainly - One initial usage of the Suggestion spell involved "Lay down for 8 hours or I'll kill you!". This blatant metagaming provoked a lot of argument, since there's only one save, and excluding the second clause (8 hours) was interpreted as going prone was enough to fulfill the Suggestion, etc. We always argue about the spell and its nebulousness.
    $endgroup$
    – Nicbobo
    Apr 2 at 19:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    One initial usage of the Suggestion spell involved "Lay down for 8 hours or I'll kill you!" — so you're afraid of abusing the spell by DM, being the DM?
    $endgroup$
    – enkryptor
    Apr 2 at 20:34










  • $begingroup$
    @enkryptor I’m not really sure how to use the spell in a combat setting, so sure. I don’t want to nerf the opposition unnecessarily and it’s clear that the designers intended a lot of flexibility with this spell and it’s effect on the Yuan-Ti’s power level. They are designed to use it three times. RAW designer commentary has indicated that it can be used in a combat fashion, so I’m looking for a more transparent, kosher alternative for quaility if life. I hope this explains a bit.
    $endgroup$
    – Nicbobo
    Apr 2 at 20:50






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Related on How do I decide that is a reasonable suggestion?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Apr 2 at 21:31

















11












$begingroup$


I'm currently running




Tomb of Annihilation




and there's a lot of Yuan-Ti the party is about to encounter.



My party has had a lot of contention and pain-points with the Suggestion spell, and it appears to be a hard spell to tie down RAW, as it is subject to a lot of contextual judgment calling and opinion based reasoning. I'm hesitant to even ask this question because the spell itself is primarily "opinion-based", and it may be closed due to its nature.



Also, every Yuan-Ti can cast this spell innately.



I don't want to deal with this potential headache. What are my options for a balanced, suitable replacement for Suggestion based on these criteria:



  1. The spell is also 2nd level or lower.

  2. The spell deals no direct physical damage upon its casting.

  3. The spell is related to either the Enchantment school of magic, a charm effect, or some other mind-altering effect.

  4. The spell must be useful in a combat encounter (for example, having direct language relating to actions taken in combat, or hostility).

Spells that keep with the theme of the Yuan-Ti would also be the most preferable and hopefully the above criteria narrow down the search to objective guidelines that do not produce subjective, opinion-based answers.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Can you clarify the "contention and pain-points" your party has had? It may help answers to avoid suggesting spells that step on unspoken expectations about suitability for use at your table.
    $endgroup$
    – Bloodcinder
    Apr 2 at 19:24






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Certainly - One initial usage of the Suggestion spell involved "Lay down for 8 hours or I'll kill you!". This blatant metagaming provoked a lot of argument, since there's only one save, and excluding the second clause (8 hours) was interpreted as going prone was enough to fulfill the Suggestion, etc. We always argue about the spell and its nebulousness.
    $endgroup$
    – Nicbobo
    Apr 2 at 19:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    One initial usage of the Suggestion spell involved "Lay down for 8 hours or I'll kill you!" — so you're afraid of abusing the spell by DM, being the DM?
    $endgroup$
    – enkryptor
    Apr 2 at 20:34










  • $begingroup$
    @enkryptor I’m not really sure how to use the spell in a combat setting, so sure. I don’t want to nerf the opposition unnecessarily and it’s clear that the designers intended a lot of flexibility with this spell and it’s effect on the Yuan-Ti’s power level. They are designed to use it three times. RAW designer commentary has indicated that it can be used in a combat fashion, so I’m looking for a more transparent, kosher alternative for quaility if life. I hope this explains a bit.
    $endgroup$
    – Nicbobo
    Apr 2 at 20:50






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Related on How do I decide that is a reasonable suggestion?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Apr 2 at 21:31













11












11








11





$begingroup$


I'm currently running




Tomb of Annihilation




and there's a lot of Yuan-Ti the party is about to encounter.



My party has had a lot of contention and pain-points with the Suggestion spell, and it appears to be a hard spell to tie down RAW, as it is subject to a lot of contextual judgment calling and opinion based reasoning. I'm hesitant to even ask this question because the spell itself is primarily "opinion-based", and it may be closed due to its nature.



Also, every Yuan-Ti can cast this spell innately.



I don't want to deal with this potential headache. What are my options for a balanced, suitable replacement for Suggestion based on these criteria:



  1. The spell is also 2nd level or lower.

  2. The spell deals no direct physical damage upon its casting.

  3. The spell is related to either the Enchantment school of magic, a charm effect, or some other mind-altering effect.

  4. The spell must be useful in a combat encounter (for example, having direct language relating to actions taken in combat, or hostility).

Spells that keep with the theme of the Yuan-Ti would also be the most preferable and hopefully the above criteria narrow down the search to objective guidelines that do not produce subjective, opinion-based answers.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm currently running




Tomb of Annihilation




and there's a lot of Yuan-Ti the party is about to encounter.



My party has had a lot of contention and pain-points with the Suggestion spell, and it appears to be a hard spell to tie down RAW, as it is subject to a lot of contextual judgment calling and opinion based reasoning. I'm hesitant to even ask this question because the spell itself is primarily "opinion-based", and it may be closed due to its nature.



Also, every Yuan-Ti can cast this spell innately.



I don't want to deal with this potential headache. What are my options for a balanced, suitable replacement for Suggestion based on these criteria:



  1. The spell is also 2nd level or lower.

  2. The spell deals no direct physical damage upon its casting.

  3. The spell is related to either the Enchantment school of magic, a charm effect, or some other mind-altering effect.

  4. The spell must be useful in a combat encounter (for example, having direct language relating to actions taken in combat, or hostility).

Spells that keep with the theme of the Yuan-Ti would also be the most preferable and hopefully the above criteria narrow down the search to objective guidelines that do not produce subjective, opinion-based answers.







dnd-5e spells mind-control






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 3 at 1:21









V2Blast

26.1k590159




26.1k590159










asked Apr 2 at 19:16









NicboboNicbobo

2,74111646




2,74111646











  • $begingroup$
    Can you clarify the "contention and pain-points" your party has had? It may help answers to avoid suggesting spells that step on unspoken expectations about suitability for use at your table.
    $endgroup$
    – Bloodcinder
    Apr 2 at 19:24






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Certainly - One initial usage of the Suggestion spell involved "Lay down for 8 hours or I'll kill you!". This blatant metagaming provoked a lot of argument, since there's only one save, and excluding the second clause (8 hours) was interpreted as going prone was enough to fulfill the Suggestion, etc. We always argue about the spell and its nebulousness.
    $endgroup$
    – Nicbobo
    Apr 2 at 19:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    One initial usage of the Suggestion spell involved "Lay down for 8 hours or I'll kill you!" — so you're afraid of abusing the spell by DM, being the DM?
    $endgroup$
    – enkryptor
    Apr 2 at 20:34










  • $begingroup$
    @enkryptor I’m not really sure how to use the spell in a combat setting, so sure. I don’t want to nerf the opposition unnecessarily and it’s clear that the designers intended a lot of flexibility with this spell and it’s effect on the Yuan-Ti’s power level. They are designed to use it three times. RAW designer commentary has indicated that it can be used in a combat fashion, so I’m looking for a more transparent, kosher alternative for quaility if life. I hope this explains a bit.
    $endgroup$
    – Nicbobo
    Apr 2 at 20:50






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Related on How do I decide that is a reasonable suggestion?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Apr 2 at 21:31
















  • $begingroup$
    Can you clarify the "contention and pain-points" your party has had? It may help answers to avoid suggesting spells that step on unspoken expectations about suitability for use at your table.
    $endgroup$
    – Bloodcinder
    Apr 2 at 19:24






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Certainly - One initial usage of the Suggestion spell involved "Lay down for 8 hours or I'll kill you!". This blatant metagaming provoked a lot of argument, since there's only one save, and excluding the second clause (8 hours) was interpreted as going prone was enough to fulfill the Suggestion, etc. We always argue about the spell and its nebulousness.
    $endgroup$
    – Nicbobo
    Apr 2 at 19:39






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    One initial usage of the Suggestion spell involved "Lay down for 8 hours or I'll kill you!" — so you're afraid of abusing the spell by DM, being the DM?
    $endgroup$
    – enkryptor
    Apr 2 at 20:34










  • $begingroup$
    @enkryptor I’m not really sure how to use the spell in a combat setting, so sure. I don’t want to nerf the opposition unnecessarily and it’s clear that the designers intended a lot of flexibility with this spell and it’s effect on the Yuan-Ti’s power level. They are designed to use it three times. RAW designer commentary has indicated that it can be used in a combat fashion, so I’m looking for a more transparent, kosher alternative for quaility if life. I hope this explains a bit.
    $endgroup$
    – Nicbobo
    Apr 2 at 20:50






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Related on How do I decide that is a reasonable suggestion?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Apr 2 at 21:31















$begingroup$
Can you clarify the "contention and pain-points" your party has had? It may help answers to avoid suggesting spells that step on unspoken expectations about suitability for use at your table.
$endgroup$
– Bloodcinder
Apr 2 at 19:24




$begingroup$
Can you clarify the "contention and pain-points" your party has had? It may help answers to avoid suggesting spells that step on unspoken expectations about suitability for use at your table.
$endgroup$
– Bloodcinder
Apr 2 at 19:24




1




1




$begingroup$
Certainly - One initial usage of the Suggestion spell involved "Lay down for 8 hours or I'll kill you!". This blatant metagaming provoked a lot of argument, since there's only one save, and excluding the second clause (8 hours) was interpreted as going prone was enough to fulfill the Suggestion, etc. We always argue about the spell and its nebulousness.
$endgroup$
– Nicbobo
Apr 2 at 19:39




$begingroup$
Certainly - One initial usage of the Suggestion spell involved "Lay down for 8 hours or I'll kill you!". This blatant metagaming provoked a lot of argument, since there's only one save, and excluding the second clause (8 hours) was interpreted as going prone was enough to fulfill the Suggestion, etc. We always argue about the spell and its nebulousness.
$endgroup$
– Nicbobo
Apr 2 at 19:39




1




1




$begingroup$
One initial usage of the Suggestion spell involved "Lay down for 8 hours or I'll kill you!" — so you're afraid of abusing the spell by DM, being the DM?
$endgroup$
– enkryptor
Apr 2 at 20:34




$begingroup$
One initial usage of the Suggestion spell involved "Lay down for 8 hours or I'll kill you!" — so you're afraid of abusing the spell by DM, being the DM?
$endgroup$
– enkryptor
Apr 2 at 20:34












$begingroup$
@enkryptor I’m not really sure how to use the spell in a combat setting, so sure. I don’t want to nerf the opposition unnecessarily and it’s clear that the designers intended a lot of flexibility with this spell and it’s effect on the Yuan-Ti’s power level. They are designed to use it three times. RAW designer commentary has indicated that it can be used in a combat fashion, so I’m looking for a more transparent, kosher alternative for quaility if life. I hope this explains a bit.
$endgroup$
– Nicbobo
Apr 2 at 20:50




$begingroup$
@enkryptor I’m not really sure how to use the spell in a combat setting, so sure. I don’t want to nerf the opposition unnecessarily and it’s clear that the designers intended a lot of flexibility with this spell and it’s effect on the Yuan-Ti’s power level. They are designed to use it three times. RAW designer commentary has indicated that it can be used in a combat fashion, so I’m looking for a more transparent, kosher alternative for quaility if life. I hope this explains a bit.
$endgroup$
– Nicbobo
Apr 2 at 20:50




1




1




$begingroup$
Related on How do I decide that is a reasonable suggestion?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Apr 2 at 21:31




$begingroup$
Related on How do I decide that is a reasonable suggestion?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Apr 2 at 21:31










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















10












$begingroup$

There are a few options from the school of Enchantment that should keep the theme.



I am listing first level spells first. I would recommend allowing the Yuan-ti to cast them at 2nd level to keep the power approximately the same as Suggestion.




  • Command cast at 2nd level - this will target 2 characters, but will only last 1 round.


  • Charm Person cast at 2nd level - will also target 2 characters, but they will have advantage on the save if they are fighting the Yuan-ti. This may be the most on theme for Yuan-ti.

2nd level spells:




  • Enthrall - this spell might allow one Yuan-ti to act as a distraction while others sneak up on the party.


  • Crown of Madness - although it is also 2nd level, this spell is slightly more powerful as it would allow the Yuan-ti to each take control of one of the PCs.


  • Calm Emotions - This can be used either to temporarily end hostility from enemies or suppress charm/fear effects in allies.





share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$

    Keeping the table happy



    The important thing to note here is that casting spells that take away player agency is almost always going to be a problem. The most important thing is to not present your players with something that will go awkwardly or make them feel like they aren't in control.



    Don't put them in a position where you are taking their player agency away. Give them an opportunity to do some interesting things with roleplaying charmed, but they shouldn't feel like you are owning their characters and their choices. If you do use enchantment spells that may do this (suggestion, charm person, command, crown of madness, etc), you need to be really careful about how you do it. Command is a bit simpler because it's just one turn, but you've taken your player out of play for that turn. The others you need to be very careful with as well so as not to think you are in control of their characters.



    Dangers of Suggestion and the like



    These spells aren't dominate person. Even suggestion stipulates:




    The suggestion must be worded in such a manner as to make the course of action sound reasonable.




    If you can't make a reasonable case, then what you're asking isn't reasonable. Coercion isn't reasonable. Reasonable is something that the character would say to themselves "Yes, this action seems completely reasonable for me to do as if I was choosing to do it myself."



    And you've only got a sentence or two to make your case. It's not easy! And that's where the spell is limited.



    Here is an excellent Q&A on figuring out what's a reasonable suggestion.



    Suggestion may be perfectly fine to keep with your Yuan-Ti, but you may need to approach how you use it differently.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Thanks for the answer - I've slightly updated the question to include the condition of 'useful in a combat encounter'. Charm Person is still an excellent answer though.
      $endgroup$
      – Nicbobo
      Apr 2 at 19:49










    • $begingroup$
      @NautArch fwiw, I'm not convinced this is an unreasonable change to the question, but where that line is drawn and how it's decided is honestly quite confusing to me.
      $endgroup$
      – Rubiksmoose
      Apr 2 at 20:03











    • $begingroup$
      My apologies. I've only seen Suggestion used for combat, but I guess that's just my bias, which may be why I dislike the spell so much.
      $endgroup$
      – Nicbobo
      Apr 2 at 20:03










    • $begingroup$
      Sorry, but I disagree with your point that coercion isn't reasonable. Coercion is perfectly reasonable, and it would be redundant to make a spell accomplish things that can be solved with Persuasion checks. Suggestion takes things to another level - check out this question: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/116996/… In what universe is this a reasonable course of action? Suggestion takes 'reasonable actions' and twists it on its head. But that's the point; it's magic.
      $endgroup$
      – Nicbobo
      Apr 2 at 20:30






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I think I could, but I think it may be better posed as its own question so we could get to the heart of the issue, instead of eating up this comment chain. It’s clear we disagree and I’ll leave it at that for now.
      $endgroup$
      – Nicbobo
      Apr 2 at 20:54












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "122"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144414%2fwhat-is-an-equivalently-powerful-replacement-spell-for-the-yuan-tis-suggestion%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    10












    $begingroup$

    There are a few options from the school of Enchantment that should keep the theme.



    I am listing first level spells first. I would recommend allowing the Yuan-ti to cast them at 2nd level to keep the power approximately the same as Suggestion.




    • Command cast at 2nd level - this will target 2 characters, but will only last 1 round.


    • Charm Person cast at 2nd level - will also target 2 characters, but they will have advantage on the save if they are fighting the Yuan-ti. This may be the most on theme for Yuan-ti.

    2nd level spells:




    • Enthrall - this spell might allow one Yuan-ti to act as a distraction while others sneak up on the party.


    • Crown of Madness - although it is also 2nd level, this spell is slightly more powerful as it would allow the Yuan-ti to each take control of one of the PCs.


    • Calm Emotions - This can be used either to temporarily end hostility from enemies or suppress charm/fear effects in allies.





    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      10












      $begingroup$

      There are a few options from the school of Enchantment that should keep the theme.



      I am listing first level spells first. I would recommend allowing the Yuan-ti to cast them at 2nd level to keep the power approximately the same as Suggestion.




      • Command cast at 2nd level - this will target 2 characters, but will only last 1 round.


      • Charm Person cast at 2nd level - will also target 2 characters, but they will have advantage on the save if they are fighting the Yuan-ti. This may be the most on theme for Yuan-ti.

      2nd level spells:




      • Enthrall - this spell might allow one Yuan-ti to act as a distraction while others sneak up on the party.


      • Crown of Madness - although it is also 2nd level, this spell is slightly more powerful as it would allow the Yuan-ti to each take control of one of the PCs.


      • Calm Emotions - This can be used either to temporarily end hostility from enemies or suppress charm/fear effects in allies.





      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        10












        10








        10





        $begingroup$

        There are a few options from the school of Enchantment that should keep the theme.



        I am listing first level spells first. I would recommend allowing the Yuan-ti to cast them at 2nd level to keep the power approximately the same as Suggestion.




        • Command cast at 2nd level - this will target 2 characters, but will only last 1 round.


        • Charm Person cast at 2nd level - will also target 2 characters, but they will have advantage on the save if they are fighting the Yuan-ti. This may be the most on theme for Yuan-ti.

        2nd level spells:




        • Enthrall - this spell might allow one Yuan-ti to act as a distraction while others sneak up on the party.


        • Crown of Madness - although it is also 2nd level, this spell is slightly more powerful as it would allow the Yuan-ti to each take control of one of the PCs.


        • Calm Emotions - This can be used either to temporarily end hostility from enemies or suppress charm/fear effects in allies.





        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        There are a few options from the school of Enchantment that should keep the theme.



        I am listing first level spells first. I would recommend allowing the Yuan-ti to cast them at 2nd level to keep the power approximately the same as Suggestion.




        • Command cast at 2nd level - this will target 2 characters, but will only last 1 round.


        • Charm Person cast at 2nd level - will also target 2 characters, but they will have advantage on the save if they are fighting the Yuan-ti. This may be the most on theme for Yuan-ti.

        2nd level spells:




        • Enthrall - this spell might allow one Yuan-ti to act as a distraction while others sneak up on the party.


        • Crown of Madness - although it is also 2nd level, this spell is slightly more powerful as it would allow the Yuan-ti to each take control of one of the PCs.


        • Calm Emotions - This can be used either to temporarily end hostility from enemies or suppress charm/fear effects in allies.






        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Apr 2 at 20:05

























        answered Apr 2 at 19:34









        user48255user48255

        5,5261033




        5,5261033























            3












            $begingroup$

            Keeping the table happy



            The important thing to note here is that casting spells that take away player agency is almost always going to be a problem. The most important thing is to not present your players with something that will go awkwardly or make them feel like they aren't in control.



            Don't put them in a position where you are taking their player agency away. Give them an opportunity to do some interesting things with roleplaying charmed, but they shouldn't feel like you are owning their characters and their choices. If you do use enchantment spells that may do this (suggestion, charm person, command, crown of madness, etc), you need to be really careful about how you do it. Command is a bit simpler because it's just one turn, but you've taken your player out of play for that turn. The others you need to be very careful with as well so as not to think you are in control of their characters.



            Dangers of Suggestion and the like



            These spells aren't dominate person. Even suggestion stipulates:




            The suggestion must be worded in such a manner as to make the course of action sound reasonable.




            If you can't make a reasonable case, then what you're asking isn't reasonable. Coercion isn't reasonable. Reasonable is something that the character would say to themselves "Yes, this action seems completely reasonable for me to do as if I was choosing to do it myself."



            And you've only got a sentence or two to make your case. It's not easy! And that's where the spell is limited.



            Here is an excellent Q&A on figuring out what's a reasonable suggestion.



            Suggestion may be perfectly fine to keep with your Yuan-Ti, but you may need to approach how you use it differently.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Thanks for the answer - I've slightly updated the question to include the condition of 'useful in a combat encounter'. Charm Person is still an excellent answer though.
              $endgroup$
              – Nicbobo
              Apr 2 at 19:49










            • $begingroup$
              @NautArch fwiw, I'm not convinced this is an unreasonable change to the question, but where that line is drawn and how it's decided is honestly quite confusing to me.
              $endgroup$
              – Rubiksmoose
              Apr 2 at 20:03











            • $begingroup$
              My apologies. I've only seen Suggestion used for combat, but I guess that's just my bias, which may be why I dislike the spell so much.
              $endgroup$
              – Nicbobo
              Apr 2 at 20:03










            • $begingroup$
              Sorry, but I disagree with your point that coercion isn't reasonable. Coercion is perfectly reasonable, and it would be redundant to make a spell accomplish things that can be solved with Persuasion checks. Suggestion takes things to another level - check out this question: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/116996/… In what universe is this a reasonable course of action? Suggestion takes 'reasonable actions' and twists it on its head. But that's the point; it's magic.
              $endgroup$
              – Nicbobo
              Apr 2 at 20:30






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I think I could, but I think it may be better posed as its own question so we could get to the heart of the issue, instead of eating up this comment chain. It’s clear we disagree and I’ll leave it at that for now.
              $endgroup$
              – Nicbobo
              Apr 2 at 20:54
















            3












            $begingroup$

            Keeping the table happy



            The important thing to note here is that casting spells that take away player agency is almost always going to be a problem. The most important thing is to not present your players with something that will go awkwardly or make them feel like they aren't in control.



            Don't put them in a position where you are taking their player agency away. Give them an opportunity to do some interesting things with roleplaying charmed, but they shouldn't feel like you are owning their characters and their choices. If you do use enchantment spells that may do this (suggestion, charm person, command, crown of madness, etc), you need to be really careful about how you do it. Command is a bit simpler because it's just one turn, but you've taken your player out of play for that turn. The others you need to be very careful with as well so as not to think you are in control of their characters.



            Dangers of Suggestion and the like



            These spells aren't dominate person. Even suggestion stipulates:




            The suggestion must be worded in such a manner as to make the course of action sound reasonable.




            If you can't make a reasonable case, then what you're asking isn't reasonable. Coercion isn't reasonable. Reasonable is something that the character would say to themselves "Yes, this action seems completely reasonable for me to do as if I was choosing to do it myself."



            And you've only got a sentence or two to make your case. It's not easy! And that's where the spell is limited.



            Here is an excellent Q&A on figuring out what's a reasonable suggestion.



            Suggestion may be perfectly fine to keep with your Yuan-Ti, but you may need to approach how you use it differently.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Thanks for the answer - I've slightly updated the question to include the condition of 'useful in a combat encounter'. Charm Person is still an excellent answer though.
              $endgroup$
              – Nicbobo
              Apr 2 at 19:49










            • $begingroup$
              @NautArch fwiw, I'm not convinced this is an unreasonable change to the question, but where that line is drawn and how it's decided is honestly quite confusing to me.
              $endgroup$
              – Rubiksmoose
              Apr 2 at 20:03











            • $begingroup$
              My apologies. I've only seen Suggestion used for combat, but I guess that's just my bias, which may be why I dislike the spell so much.
              $endgroup$
              – Nicbobo
              Apr 2 at 20:03










            • $begingroup$
              Sorry, but I disagree with your point that coercion isn't reasonable. Coercion is perfectly reasonable, and it would be redundant to make a spell accomplish things that can be solved with Persuasion checks. Suggestion takes things to another level - check out this question: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/116996/… In what universe is this a reasonable course of action? Suggestion takes 'reasonable actions' and twists it on its head. But that's the point; it's magic.
              $endgroup$
              – Nicbobo
              Apr 2 at 20:30






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I think I could, but I think it may be better posed as its own question so we could get to the heart of the issue, instead of eating up this comment chain. It’s clear we disagree and I’ll leave it at that for now.
              $endgroup$
              – Nicbobo
              Apr 2 at 20:54














            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            Keeping the table happy



            The important thing to note here is that casting spells that take away player agency is almost always going to be a problem. The most important thing is to not present your players with something that will go awkwardly or make them feel like they aren't in control.



            Don't put them in a position where you are taking their player agency away. Give them an opportunity to do some interesting things with roleplaying charmed, but they shouldn't feel like you are owning their characters and their choices. If you do use enchantment spells that may do this (suggestion, charm person, command, crown of madness, etc), you need to be really careful about how you do it. Command is a bit simpler because it's just one turn, but you've taken your player out of play for that turn. The others you need to be very careful with as well so as not to think you are in control of their characters.



            Dangers of Suggestion and the like



            These spells aren't dominate person. Even suggestion stipulates:




            The suggestion must be worded in such a manner as to make the course of action sound reasonable.




            If you can't make a reasonable case, then what you're asking isn't reasonable. Coercion isn't reasonable. Reasonable is something that the character would say to themselves "Yes, this action seems completely reasonable for me to do as if I was choosing to do it myself."



            And you've only got a sentence or two to make your case. It's not easy! And that's where the spell is limited.



            Here is an excellent Q&A on figuring out what's a reasonable suggestion.



            Suggestion may be perfectly fine to keep with your Yuan-Ti, but you may need to approach how you use it differently.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Keeping the table happy



            The important thing to note here is that casting spells that take away player agency is almost always going to be a problem. The most important thing is to not present your players with something that will go awkwardly or make them feel like they aren't in control.



            Don't put them in a position where you are taking their player agency away. Give them an opportunity to do some interesting things with roleplaying charmed, but they shouldn't feel like you are owning their characters and their choices. If you do use enchantment spells that may do this (suggestion, charm person, command, crown of madness, etc), you need to be really careful about how you do it. Command is a bit simpler because it's just one turn, but you've taken your player out of play for that turn. The others you need to be very careful with as well so as not to think you are in control of their characters.



            Dangers of Suggestion and the like



            These spells aren't dominate person. Even suggestion stipulates:




            The suggestion must be worded in such a manner as to make the course of action sound reasonable.




            If you can't make a reasonable case, then what you're asking isn't reasonable. Coercion isn't reasonable. Reasonable is something that the character would say to themselves "Yes, this action seems completely reasonable for me to do as if I was choosing to do it myself."



            And you've only got a sentence or two to make your case. It's not easy! And that's where the spell is limited.



            Here is an excellent Q&A on figuring out what's a reasonable suggestion.



            Suggestion may be perfectly fine to keep with your Yuan-Ti, but you may need to approach how you use it differently.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Apr 2 at 20:56

























            answered Apr 2 at 19:34









            NautArchNautArch

            61.9k8223410




            61.9k8223410











            • $begingroup$
              Thanks for the answer - I've slightly updated the question to include the condition of 'useful in a combat encounter'. Charm Person is still an excellent answer though.
              $endgroup$
              – Nicbobo
              Apr 2 at 19:49










            • $begingroup$
              @NautArch fwiw, I'm not convinced this is an unreasonable change to the question, but where that line is drawn and how it's decided is honestly quite confusing to me.
              $endgroup$
              – Rubiksmoose
              Apr 2 at 20:03











            • $begingroup$
              My apologies. I've only seen Suggestion used for combat, but I guess that's just my bias, which may be why I dislike the spell so much.
              $endgroup$
              – Nicbobo
              Apr 2 at 20:03










            • $begingroup$
              Sorry, but I disagree with your point that coercion isn't reasonable. Coercion is perfectly reasonable, and it would be redundant to make a spell accomplish things that can be solved with Persuasion checks. Suggestion takes things to another level - check out this question: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/116996/… In what universe is this a reasonable course of action? Suggestion takes 'reasonable actions' and twists it on its head. But that's the point; it's magic.
              $endgroup$
              – Nicbobo
              Apr 2 at 20:30






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I think I could, but I think it may be better posed as its own question so we could get to the heart of the issue, instead of eating up this comment chain. It’s clear we disagree and I’ll leave it at that for now.
              $endgroup$
              – Nicbobo
              Apr 2 at 20:54

















            • $begingroup$
              Thanks for the answer - I've slightly updated the question to include the condition of 'useful in a combat encounter'. Charm Person is still an excellent answer though.
              $endgroup$
              – Nicbobo
              Apr 2 at 19:49










            • $begingroup$
              @NautArch fwiw, I'm not convinced this is an unreasonable change to the question, but where that line is drawn and how it's decided is honestly quite confusing to me.
              $endgroup$
              – Rubiksmoose
              Apr 2 at 20:03











            • $begingroup$
              My apologies. I've only seen Suggestion used for combat, but I guess that's just my bias, which may be why I dislike the spell so much.
              $endgroup$
              – Nicbobo
              Apr 2 at 20:03










            • $begingroup$
              Sorry, but I disagree with your point that coercion isn't reasonable. Coercion is perfectly reasonable, and it would be redundant to make a spell accomplish things that can be solved with Persuasion checks. Suggestion takes things to another level - check out this question: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/116996/… In what universe is this a reasonable course of action? Suggestion takes 'reasonable actions' and twists it on its head. But that's the point; it's magic.
              $endgroup$
              – Nicbobo
              Apr 2 at 20:30






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I think I could, but I think it may be better posed as its own question so we could get to the heart of the issue, instead of eating up this comment chain. It’s clear we disagree and I’ll leave it at that for now.
              $endgroup$
              – Nicbobo
              Apr 2 at 20:54
















            $begingroup$
            Thanks for the answer - I've slightly updated the question to include the condition of 'useful in a combat encounter'. Charm Person is still an excellent answer though.
            $endgroup$
            – Nicbobo
            Apr 2 at 19:49




            $begingroup$
            Thanks for the answer - I've slightly updated the question to include the condition of 'useful in a combat encounter'. Charm Person is still an excellent answer though.
            $endgroup$
            – Nicbobo
            Apr 2 at 19:49












            $begingroup$
            @NautArch fwiw, I'm not convinced this is an unreasonable change to the question, but where that line is drawn and how it's decided is honestly quite confusing to me.
            $endgroup$
            – Rubiksmoose
            Apr 2 at 20:03





            $begingroup$
            @NautArch fwiw, I'm not convinced this is an unreasonable change to the question, but where that line is drawn and how it's decided is honestly quite confusing to me.
            $endgroup$
            – Rubiksmoose
            Apr 2 at 20:03













            $begingroup$
            My apologies. I've only seen Suggestion used for combat, but I guess that's just my bias, which may be why I dislike the spell so much.
            $endgroup$
            – Nicbobo
            Apr 2 at 20:03




            $begingroup$
            My apologies. I've only seen Suggestion used for combat, but I guess that's just my bias, which may be why I dislike the spell so much.
            $endgroup$
            – Nicbobo
            Apr 2 at 20:03












            $begingroup$
            Sorry, but I disagree with your point that coercion isn't reasonable. Coercion is perfectly reasonable, and it would be redundant to make a spell accomplish things that can be solved with Persuasion checks. Suggestion takes things to another level - check out this question: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/116996/… In what universe is this a reasonable course of action? Suggestion takes 'reasonable actions' and twists it on its head. But that's the point; it's magic.
            $endgroup$
            – Nicbobo
            Apr 2 at 20:30




            $begingroup$
            Sorry, but I disagree with your point that coercion isn't reasonable. Coercion is perfectly reasonable, and it would be redundant to make a spell accomplish things that can be solved with Persuasion checks. Suggestion takes things to another level - check out this question: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/116996/… In what universe is this a reasonable course of action? Suggestion takes 'reasonable actions' and twists it on its head. But that's the point; it's magic.
            $endgroup$
            – Nicbobo
            Apr 2 at 20:30




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            I think I could, but I think it may be better posed as its own question so we could get to the heart of the issue, instead of eating up this comment chain. It’s clear we disagree and I’ll leave it at that for now.
            $endgroup$
            – Nicbobo
            Apr 2 at 20:54





            $begingroup$
            I think I could, but I think it may be better posed as its own question so we could get to the heart of the issue, instead of eating up this comment chain. It’s clear we disagree and I’ll leave it at that for now.
            $endgroup$
            – Nicbobo
            Apr 2 at 20:54


















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144414%2fwhat-is-an-equivalently-powerful-replacement-spell-for-the-yuan-tis-suggestion%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Sum ergo cogito? 1 nng

            三茅街道4182Guuntc Dn precexpngmageondP