Right-skewed distribution with mean equals to mode? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)CDFs for Right-Skewed DistributionsDistributions with Median=Mode=Average?Skewness - why is this distribution right skewed?Compute mode of distributionWhy not take the mode of a bootstrap distribution?Does mean=mode imply a symmetric distribution?Bounding the distance between the mean and the mode of a unimodal distributionCounterexamples where Median is outside [Mode-Mean]R glmer: distribution for strongly right skewed dataHow to generate a skewed bell curve distribution function with known min, max, and mode
Misunderstanding of Sylow theory
Intuitive explanation of the rank-nullity theorem
Why weren't discrete x86 CPUs ever used in game hardware?
An adverb for when you're not exaggerating
How to run automated tests after each commit?
Do wooden building fires get hotter than 600°C?
What does Turing mean by this statement?
Crossing US/Canada Border for less than 24 hours
Should a wizard buy fine inks every time he want to copy spells into his spellbook?
How many morphisms from 1 to 1+1 can there be?
Does the Mueller report show a conspiracy between Russia and the Trump Campaign?
How do living politicians protect their readily obtainable signatures from misuse?
Drawing spherical mirrors
How to identify unknown coordinate type and convert to lat/lon?
What to do with repeated rejections for phd position
What is the difference between a "ranged attack" and a "ranged weapon attack"?
Is there hard evidence that the grant peer review system performs significantly better than random?
Co-worker has annoying ringtone
A term for a woman complaining about things/begging in a cute/childish way
AppleTVs create a chatty alternate WiFi network
Tannaka duality for semisimple groups
Strange behavior of Object.defineProperty() in JavaScript
One-one communication
Flash light on something
Right-skewed distribution with mean equals to mode?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)CDFs for Right-Skewed DistributionsDistributions with Median=Mode=Average?Skewness - why is this distribution right skewed?Compute mode of distributionWhy not take the mode of a bootstrap distribution?Does mean=mode imply a symmetric distribution?Bounding the distance between the mean and the mode of a unimodal distributionCounterexamples where Median is outside [Mode-Mean]R glmer: distribution for strongly right skewed dataHow to generate a skewed bell curve distribution function with known min, max, and mode
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Is it possible to have a right-skewed distribution with mean equal to mode? If so, could you give me some example?
distributions mean skewness mode
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it possible to have a right-skewed distribution with mean equal to mode? If so, could you give me some example?
distributions mean skewness mode
New contributor
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Take a suitable mixture of any finite-mean skewed distribution and any finite-mean unimodal symmetric distribution with the same mean. All continuous examples and all discrete examples arise in this way.
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
Apr 15 at 20:27
$begingroup$
@whuber, That's a great idea. If you have time, it would be terrific if you made a slightly more detailed answer out of that.
$endgroup$
– beta1_equals_beta2
Apr 15 at 21:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it possible to have a right-skewed distribution with mean equal to mode? If so, could you give me some example?
distributions mean skewness mode
New contributor
$endgroup$
Is it possible to have a right-skewed distribution with mean equal to mode? If so, could you give me some example?
distributions mean skewness mode
distributions mean skewness mode
New contributor
New contributor
edited Apr 15 at 17:14
Nick Cox
39.4k588132
39.4k588132
New contributor
asked Apr 15 at 16:03
Don TawanpitakDon Tawanpitak
363
363
New contributor
New contributor
3
$begingroup$
Take a suitable mixture of any finite-mean skewed distribution and any finite-mean unimodal symmetric distribution with the same mean. All continuous examples and all discrete examples arise in this way.
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
Apr 15 at 20:27
$begingroup$
@whuber, That's a great idea. If you have time, it would be terrific if you made a slightly more detailed answer out of that.
$endgroup$
– beta1_equals_beta2
Apr 15 at 21:25
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Take a suitable mixture of any finite-mean skewed distribution and any finite-mean unimodal symmetric distribution with the same mean. All continuous examples and all discrete examples arise in this way.
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
Apr 15 at 20:27
$begingroup$
@whuber, That's a great idea. If you have time, it would be terrific if you made a slightly more detailed answer out of that.
$endgroup$
– beta1_equals_beta2
Apr 15 at 21:25
3
3
$begingroup$
Take a suitable mixture of any finite-mean skewed distribution and any finite-mean unimodal symmetric distribution with the same mean. All continuous examples and all discrete examples arise in this way.
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
Apr 15 at 20:27
$begingroup$
Take a suitable mixture of any finite-mean skewed distribution and any finite-mean unimodal symmetric distribution with the same mean. All continuous examples and all discrete examples arise in this way.
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
Apr 15 at 20:27
$begingroup$
@whuber, That's a great idea. If you have time, it would be terrific if you made a slightly more detailed answer out of that.
$endgroup$
– beta1_equals_beta2
Apr 15 at 21:25
$begingroup$
@whuber, That's a great idea. If you have time, it would be terrific if you made a slightly more detailed answer out of that.
$endgroup$
– beta1_equals_beta2
Apr 15 at 21:25
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Easy examples come from binomial distributions -- which can hardly be dismissed as pathological or as bizarre counter-examples constructed ad hoc. Here is one for 10 trials and probability of success 0.1. Then the mean is 10 $times$ 0.1 = 1, and 1 also is the mode (and for a bonus the median too), but the distribution is manifestly right skewed.
The code giving the number of successes 0 to 10 and their probabilities 0.348678... and so forth is Mata code from Stata, but your favourite statistical platform should be able to do it. (If not, you need a new favourite.)
: (0::10), binomialp(10, (0::10), 0.1)
1 2
+-----------------------------+
1 | 0 .3486784401 |
2 | 1 .387420489 |
3 | 2 .1937102445 |
4 | 3 .057395628 |
5 | 4 .011160261 |
6 | 5 .0014880348 |
7 | 6 .000137781 |
8 | 7 8.74800e-06 |
9 | 8 3.64500e-07 |
10 | 9 9.00000e-09 |
11 | 10 1.00000e-10 |
+-----------------------------+
Among continuous distributions, the Weibull distribution can show equal mean and mode yet be right-skewed.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you! This is absolutely helpful! I will also look into the Weibull distribution you mentioned.
$endgroup$
– Don Tawanpitak
Apr 15 at 19:00
$begingroup$
By the way, do you know some other continuous distribution with finite support that can exhibit the same property?
$endgroup$
– Don Tawanpitak
Apr 15 at 19:04
2
$begingroup$
@DonTawanpitak A quick numerical search for the Weibull only revealed one solution: $alpha = 3.3125, beta = 1$ where $alpha$ is the shape and $beta$ is the scale. The mode and mean are then $0.897186$. But this Weibull isn't terribly right skewed (its skewness is $0.074$).
$endgroup$
– COOLSerdash
Apr 15 at 19:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If the distribution is discrete, sure. It's easy. For example, a distribution with probability mass function
$P(X=0) = 0.36$
$P(X=1) = 0.40$
$P(X=2) = 0.13$
$P(X=3) = 0.10$
$P(X=4) = 0.01$
is right (i.e. positively) skewed and has both a mean and a mode of 1.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is this suggesting that discrete distributions, as opposed to continuous distributions are more likely to exhibit this property? There seems to be a strong argument for that.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Cleberg
Apr 15 at 18:47
1
$begingroup$
No, I'm not suggesting that. I'm just saying it's easy to come up with an example (which is all the OP asked for) of a discrete distribution with that property.
$endgroup$
– beta1_equals_beta2
Apr 15 at 18:53
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "65"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Don Tawanpitak is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f403181%2fright-skewed-distribution-with-mean-equals-to-mode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Easy examples come from binomial distributions -- which can hardly be dismissed as pathological or as bizarre counter-examples constructed ad hoc. Here is one for 10 trials and probability of success 0.1. Then the mean is 10 $times$ 0.1 = 1, and 1 also is the mode (and for a bonus the median too), but the distribution is manifestly right skewed.
The code giving the number of successes 0 to 10 and their probabilities 0.348678... and so forth is Mata code from Stata, but your favourite statistical platform should be able to do it. (If not, you need a new favourite.)
: (0::10), binomialp(10, (0::10), 0.1)
1 2
+-----------------------------+
1 | 0 .3486784401 |
2 | 1 .387420489 |
3 | 2 .1937102445 |
4 | 3 .057395628 |
5 | 4 .011160261 |
6 | 5 .0014880348 |
7 | 6 .000137781 |
8 | 7 8.74800e-06 |
9 | 8 3.64500e-07 |
10 | 9 9.00000e-09 |
11 | 10 1.00000e-10 |
+-----------------------------+
Among continuous distributions, the Weibull distribution can show equal mean and mode yet be right-skewed.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you! This is absolutely helpful! I will also look into the Weibull distribution you mentioned.
$endgroup$
– Don Tawanpitak
Apr 15 at 19:00
$begingroup$
By the way, do you know some other continuous distribution with finite support that can exhibit the same property?
$endgroup$
– Don Tawanpitak
Apr 15 at 19:04
2
$begingroup$
@DonTawanpitak A quick numerical search for the Weibull only revealed one solution: $alpha = 3.3125, beta = 1$ where $alpha$ is the shape and $beta$ is the scale. The mode and mean are then $0.897186$. But this Weibull isn't terribly right skewed (its skewness is $0.074$).
$endgroup$
– COOLSerdash
Apr 15 at 19:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Easy examples come from binomial distributions -- which can hardly be dismissed as pathological or as bizarre counter-examples constructed ad hoc. Here is one for 10 trials and probability of success 0.1. Then the mean is 10 $times$ 0.1 = 1, and 1 also is the mode (and for a bonus the median too), but the distribution is manifestly right skewed.
The code giving the number of successes 0 to 10 and their probabilities 0.348678... and so forth is Mata code from Stata, but your favourite statistical platform should be able to do it. (If not, you need a new favourite.)
: (0::10), binomialp(10, (0::10), 0.1)
1 2
+-----------------------------+
1 | 0 .3486784401 |
2 | 1 .387420489 |
3 | 2 .1937102445 |
4 | 3 .057395628 |
5 | 4 .011160261 |
6 | 5 .0014880348 |
7 | 6 .000137781 |
8 | 7 8.74800e-06 |
9 | 8 3.64500e-07 |
10 | 9 9.00000e-09 |
11 | 10 1.00000e-10 |
+-----------------------------+
Among continuous distributions, the Weibull distribution can show equal mean and mode yet be right-skewed.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you! This is absolutely helpful! I will also look into the Weibull distribution you mentioned.
$endgroup$
– Don Tawanpitak
Apr 15 at 19:00
$begingroup$
By the way, do you know some other continuous distribution with finite support that can exhibit the same property?
$endgroup$
– Don Tawanpitak
Apr 15 at 19:04
2
$begingroup$
@DonTawanpitak A quick numerical search for the Weibull only revealed one solution: $alpha = 3.3125, beta = 1$ where $alpha$ is the shape and $beta$ is the scale. The mode and mean are then $0.897186$. But this Weibull isn't terribly right skewed (its skewness is $0.074$).
$endgroup$
– COOLSerdash
Apr 15 at 19:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Easy examples come from binomial distributions -- which can hardly be dismissed as pathological or as bizarre counter-examples constructed ad hoc. Here is one for 10 trials and probability of success 0.1. Then the mean is 10 $times$ 0.1 = 1, and 1 also is the mode (and for a bonus the median too), but the distribution is manifestly right skewed.
The code giving the number of successes 0 to 10 and their probabilities 0.348678... and so forth is Mata code from Stata, but your favourite statistical platform should be able to do it. (If not, you need a new favourite.)
: (0::10), binomialp(10, (0::10), 0.1)
1 2
+-----------------------------+
1 | 0 .3486784401 |
2 | 1 .387420489 |
3 | 2 .1937102445 |
4 | 3 .057395628 |
5 | 4 .011160261 |
6 | 5 .0014880348 |
7 | 6 .000137781 |
8 | 7 8.74800e-06 |
9 | 8 3.64500e-07 |
10 | 9 9.00000e-09 |
11 | 10 1.00000e-10 |
+-----------------------------+
Among continuous distributions, the Weibull distribution can show equal mean and mode yet be right-skewed.
$endgroup$
Easy examples come from binomial distributions -- which can hardly be dismissed as pathological or as bizarre counter-examples constructed ad hoc. Here is one for 10 trials and probability of success 0.1. Then the mean is 10 $times$ 0.1 = 1, and 1 also is the mode (and for a bonus the median too), but the distribution is manifestly right skewed.
The code giving the number of successes 0 to 10 and their probabilities 0.348678... and so forth is Mata code from Stata, but your favourite statistical platform should be able to do it. (If not, you need a new favourite.)
: (0::10), binomialp(10, (0::10), 0.1)
1 2
+-----------------------------+
1 | 0 .3486784401 |
2 | 1 .387420489 |
3 | 2 .1937102445 |
4 | 3 .057395628 |
5 | 4 .011160261 |
6 | 5 .0014880348 |
7 | 6 .000137781 |
8 | 7 8.74800e-06 |
9 | 8 3.64500e-07 |
10 | 9 9.00000e-09 |
11 | 10 1.00000e-10 |
+-----------------------------+
Among continuous distributions, the Weibull distribution can show equal mean and mode yet be right-skewed.
edited Apr 15 at 17:33
answered Apr 15 at 17:20
Nick CoxNick Cox
39.4k588132
39.4k588132
$begingroup$
Thank you! This is absolutely helpful! I will also look into the Weibull distribution you mentioned.
$endgroup$
– Don Tawanpitak
Apr 15 at 19:00
$begingroup$
By the way, do you know some other continuous distribution with finite support that can exhibit the same property?
$endgroup$
– Don Tawanpitak
Apr 15 at 19:04
2
$begingroup$
@DonTawanpitak A quick numerical search for the Weibull only revealed one solution: $alpha = 3.3125, beta = 1$ where $alpha$ is the shape and $beta$ is the scale. The mode and mean are then $0.897186$. But this Weibull isn't terribly right skewed (its skewness is $0.074$).
$endgroup$
– COOLSerdash
Apr 15 at 19:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you! This is absolutely helpful! I will also look into the Weibull distribution you mentioned.
$endgroup$
– Don Tawanpitak
Apr 15 at 19:00
$begingroup$
By the way, do you know some other continuous distribution with finite support that can exhibit the same property?
$endgroup$
– Don Tawanpitak
Apr 15 at 19:04
2
$begingroup$
@DonTawanpitak A quick numerical search for the Weibull only revealed one solution: $alpha = 3.3125, beta = 1$ where $alpha$ is the shape and $beta$ is the scale. The mode and mean are then $0.897186$. But this Weibull isn't terribly right skewed (its skewness is $0.074$).
$endgroup$
– COOLSerdash
Apr 15 at 19:12
$begingroup$
Thank you! This is absolutely helpful! I will also look into the Weibull distribution you mentioned.
$endgroup$
– Don Tawanpitak
Apr 15 at 19:00
$begingroup$
Thank you! This is absolutely helpful! I will also look into the Weibull distribution you mentioned.
$endgroup$
– Don Tawanpitak
Apr 15 at 19:00
$begingroup$
By the way, do you know some other continuous distribution with finite support that can exhibit the same property?
$endgroup$
– Don Tawanpitak
Apr 15 at 19:04
$begingroup$
By the way, do you know some other continuous distribution with finite support that can exhibit the same property?
$endgroup$
– Don Tawanpitak
Apr 15 at 19:04
2
2
$begingroup$
@DonTawanpitak A quick numerical search for the Weibull only revealed one solution: $alpha = 3.3125, beta = 1$ where $alpha$ is the shape and $beta$ is the scale. The mode and mean are then $0.897186$. But this Weibull isn't terribly right skewed (its skewness is $0.074$).
$endgroup$
– COOLSerdash
Apr 15 at 19:12
$begingroup$
@DonTawanpitak A quick numerical search for the Weibull only revealed one solution: $alpha = 3.3125, beta = 1$ where $alpha$ is the shape and $beta$ is the scale. The mode and mean are then $0.897186$. But this Weibull isn't terribly right skewed (its skewness is $0.074$).
$endgroup$
– COOLSerdash
Apr 15 at 19:12
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If the distribution is discrete, sure. It's easy. For example, a distribution with probability mass function
$P(X=0) = 0.36$
$P(X=1) = 0.40$
$P(X=2) = 0.13$
$P(X=3) = 0.10$
$P(X=4) = 0.01$
is right (i.e. positively) skewed and has both a mean and a mode of 1.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is this suggesting that discrete distributions, as opposed to continuous distributions are more likely to exhibit this property? There seems to be a strong argument for that.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Cleberg
Apr 15 at 18:47
1
$begingroup$
No, I'm not suggesting that. I'm just saying it's easy to come up with an example (which is all the OP asked for) of a discrete distribution with that property.
$endgroup$
– beta1_equals_beta2
Apr 15 at 18:53
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If the distribution is discrete, sure. It's easy. For example, a distribution with probability mass function
$P(X=0) = 0.36$
$P(X=1) = 0.40$
$P(X=2) = 0.13$
$P(X=3) = 0.10$
$P(X=4) = 0.01$
is right (i.e. positively) skewed and has both a mean and a mode of 1.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is this suggesting that discrete distributions, as opposed to continuous distributions are more likely to exhibit this property? There seems to be a strong argument for that.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Cleberg
Apr 15 at 18:47
1
$begingroup$
No, I'm not suggesting that. I'm just saying it's easy to come up with an example (which is all the OP asked for) of a discrete distribution with that property.
$endgroup$
– beta1_equals_beta2
Apr 15 at 18:53
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If the distribution is discrete, sure. It's easy. For example, a distribution with probability mass function
$P(X=0) = 0.36$
$P(X=1) = 0.40$
$P(X=2) = 0.13$
$P(X=3) = 0.10$
$P(X=4) = 0.01$
is right (i.e. positively) skewed and has both a mean and a mode of 1.
$endgroup$
If the distribution is discrete, sure. It's easy. For example, a distribution with probability mass function
$P(X=0) = 0.36$
$P(X=1) = 0.40$
$P(X=2) = 0.13$
$P(X=3) = 0.10$
$P(X=4) = 0.01$
is right (i.e. positively) skewed and has both a mean and a mode of 1.
answered Apr 15 at 17:00
beta1_equals_beta2beta1_equals_beta2
1063
1063
$begingroup$
Is this suggesting that discrete distributions, as opposed to continuous distributions are more likely to exhibit this property? There seems to be a strong argument for that.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Cleberg
Apr 15 at 18:47
1
$begingroup$
No, I'm not suggesting that. I'm just saying it's easy to come up with an example (which is all the OP asked for) of a discrete distribution with that property.
$endgroup$
– beta1_equals_beta2
Apr 15 at 18:53
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is this suggesting that discrete distributions, as opposed to continuous distributions are more likely to exhibit this property? There seems to be a strong argument for that.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Cleberg
Apr 15 at 18:47
1
$begingroup$
No, I'm not suggesting that. I'm just saying it's easy to come up with an example (which is all the OP asked for) of a discrete distribution with that property.
$endgroup$
– beta1_equals_beta2
Apr 15 at 18:53
$begingroup$
Is this suggesting that discrete distributions, as opposed to continuous distributions are more likely to exhibit this property? There seems to be a strong argument for that.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Cleberg
Apr 15 at 18:47
$begingroup$
Is this suggesting that discrete distributions, as opposed to continuous distributions are more likely to exhibit this property? There seems to be a strong argument for that.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Cleberg
Apr 15 at 18:47
1
1
$begingroup$
No, I'm not suggesting that. I'm just saying it's easy to come up with an example (which is all the OP asked for) of a discrete distribution with that property.
$endgroup$
– beta1_equals_beta2
Apr 15 at 18:53
$begingroup$
No, I'm not suggesting that. I'm just saying it's easy to come up with an example (which is all the OP asked for) of a discrete distribution with that property.
$endgroup$
– beta1_equals_beta2
Apr 15 at 18:53
add a comment |
Don Tawanpitak is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Don Tawanpitak is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Don Tawanpitak is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Don Tawanpitak is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f403181%2fright-skewed-distribution-with-mean-equals-to-mode%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Take a suitable mixture of any finite-mean skewed distribution and any finite-mean unimodal symmetric distribution with the same mean. All continuous examples and all discrete examples arise in this way.
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
Apr 15 at 20:27
$begingroup$
@whuber, That's a great idea. If you have time, it would be terrific if you made a slightly more detailed answer out of that.
$endgroup$
– beta1_equals_beta2
Apr 15 at 21:25