Can distinct morphisms between curves induce the same morphism on singular cohomology? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Generic fiber of morphism between non-singular curvesWhat are unramified morphisms like?Does the normalization of a projective morphism determine the line bundle?Field of definition of canonical morphism between (congruence) modular curvesEtale covers of a hyperelliptic curvepushing out families of curvesWhat happens to the gonality under a finite morphism of curvesCan a birational morphism between two smooth varieties of the same betti numbers exist?Examples of endomorphisms of complex curvesDoes there exist trace maps between $ell$-adic cohomology groups for finite flat morphisms?

Can distinct morphisms between curves induce the same morphism on singular cohomology?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Generic fiber of morphism between non-singular curvesWhat are unramified morphisms like?Does the normalization of a projective morphism determine the line bundle?Field of definition of canonical morphism between (congruence) modular curvesEtale covers of a hyperelliptic curvepushing out families of curvesWhat happens to the gonality under a finite morphism of curvesCan a birational morphism between two smooth varieties of the same betti numbers exist?Examples of endomorphisms of complex curvesDoes there exist trace maps between $ell$-adic cohomology groups for finite flat morphisms?










4












$begingroup$


Suppose $f,g:X rightarrow Y$ are finite morphisms between connected smooth curves over $mathbbC$, with $Y$ of genus at least $2$.



If $f$ and $g$ induce the same morphism $H^*(Y,mathbbC) rightarrow H^*(X,mathbbC)$, does $f=g$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    4












    $begingroup$


    Suppose $f,g:X rightarrow Y$ are finite morphisms between connected smooth curves over $mathbbC$, with $Y$ of genus at least $2$.



    If $f$ and $g$ induce the same morphism $H^*(Y,mathbbC) rightarrow H^*(X,mathbbC)$, does $f=g$?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      4












      4








      4


      1



      $begingroup$


      Suppose $f,g:X rightarrow Y$ are finite morphisms between connected smooth curves over $mathbbC$, with $Y$ of genus at least $2$.



      If $f$ and $g$ induce the same morphism $H^*(Y,mathbbC) rightarrow H^*(X,mathbbC)$, does $f=g$?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Suppose $f,g:X rightarrow Y$ are finite morphisms between connected smooth curves over $mathbbC$, with $Y$ of genus at least $2$.



      If $f$ and $g$ induce the same morphism $H^*(Y,mathbbC) rightarrow H^*(X,mathbbC)$, does $f=g$?







      ag.algebraic-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Apr 9 at 22:35









      rj7k8rj7k8

      195117




      195117




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          8












          $begingroup$

          Yes. Since $Y$ embeds into its Jacobian $B$, it is enough to prove the statement for pairs of maps to an abelian variety $f, gcolon Xto B$ sending a base point $xin X$ to $0in B$. Every such map factors uniquely through the Albanese variety $A$ of $X$, so we reduce further to the case of pairs of maps $f, gcolon Ato B$ between abelian varieties (sending $0$ to $0$). Every such map is necessarily a group homomorphism, and is uniquely determined by what it does on $pi_1 = H_1$, or on $H^1(-, mathbfC)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 3




            $begingroup$
            It seems to me that you have not used that the genus of $Y$ is at least $2$ (which is certainly a necessary condition).
            $endgroup$
            – ulrich
            Apr 10 at 4:15






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @ulrich I think this condition is used implicitly in the first step. The argument after that point provides the equality $f=alpha circ g$ where $alpha:B rightarrow B$ is a translation, but genus $>1$ is needed to then conclude that $f=g$. I did this using that $alpha$ induces both the identity on cohomology and an automorphism of $Y$, and using the Lefschetz fixed point formula (maybe Piotr had something else in mind).
            $endgroup$
            – rj7k8
            Apr 10 at 16:22










          • $begingroup$
            @ulrich You are right, the argument works literally if $f$ and $g$ satisfy $f(x)=g(x)$. Without this assumption, it shows that $f$ and $g$ differ by a translation in $B$. So it remains to show that if $Y$ is a curve of genus $>1$ embedded in its Jacobian $B$, then for every $bin B$, $Ycap (b+Y)$ is finite. Otherwise, $Y = b+Y$ and you can argue as rj7k8 above, but I guess there should be a direct argument using Riemann-Roch.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Achinger
            Apr 10 at 16:45











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "504"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f327615%2fcan-distinct-morphisms-between-curves-induce-the-same-morphism-on-singular-cohom%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          8












          $begingroup$

          Yes. Since $Y$ embeds into its Jacobian $B$, it is enough to prove the statement for pairs of maps to an abelian variety $f, gcolon Xto B$ sending a base point $xin X$ to $0in B$. Every such map factors uniquely through the Albanese variety $A$ of $X$, so we reduce further to the case of pairs of maps $f, gcolon Ato B$ between abelian varieties (sending $0$ to $0$). Every such map is necessarily a group homomorphism, and is uniquely determined by what it does on $pi_1 = H_1$, or on $H^1(-, mathbfC)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 3




            $begingroup$
            It seems to me that you have not used that the genus of $Y$ is at least $2$ (which is certainly a necessary condition).
            $endgroup$
            – ulrich
            Apr 10 at 4:15






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @ulrich I think this condition is used implicitly in the first step. The argument after that point provides the equality $f=alpha circ g$ where $alpha:B rightarrow B$ is a translation, but genus $>1$ is needed to then conclude that $f=g$. I did this using that $alpha$ induces both the identity on cohomology and an automorphism of $Y$, and using the Lefschetz fixed point formula (maybe Piotr had something else in mind).
            $endgroup$
            – rj7k8
            Apr 10 at 16:22










          • $begingroup$
            @ulrich You are right, the argument works literally if $f$ and $g$ satisfy $f(x)=g(x)$. Without this assumption, it shows that $f$ and $g$ differ by a translation in $B$. So it remains to show that if $Y$ is a curve of genus $>1$ embedded in its Jacobian $B$, then for every $bin B$, $Ycap (b+Y)$ is finite. Otherwise, $Y = b+Y$ and you can argue as rj7k8 above, but I guess there should be a direct argument using Riemann-Roch.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Achinger
            Apr 10 at 16:45















          8












          $begingroup$

          Yes. Since $Y$ embeds into its Jacobian $B$, it is enough to prove the statement for pairs of maps to an abelian variety $f, gcolon Xto B$ sending a base point $xin X$ to $0in B$. Every such map factors uniquely through the Albanese variety $A$ of $X$, so we reduce further to the case of pairs of maps $f, gcolon Ato B$ between abelian varieties (sending $0$ to $0$). Every such map is necessarily a group homomorphism, and is uniquely determined by what it does on $pi_1 = H_1$, or on $H^1(-, mathbfC)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 3




            $begingroup$
            It seems to me that you have not used that the genus of $Y$ is at least $2$ (which is certainly a necessary condition).
            $endgroup$
            – ulrich
            Apr 10 at 4:15






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @ulrich I think this condition is used implicitly in the first step. The argument after that point provides the equality $f=alpha circ g$ where $alpha:B rightarrow B$ is a translation, but genus $>1$ is needed to then conclude that $f=g$. I did this using that $alpha$ induces both the identity on cohomology and an automorphism of $Y$, and using the Lefschetz fixed point formula (maybe Piotr had something else in mind).
            $endgroup$
            – rj7k8
            Apr 10 at 16:22










          • $begingroup$
            @ulrich You are right, the argument works literally if $f$ and $g$ satisfy $f(x)=g(x)$. Without this assumption, it shows that $f$ and $g$ differ by a translation in $B$. So it remains to show that if $Y$ is a curve of genus $>1$ embedded in its Jacobian $B$, then for every $bin B$, $Ycap (b+Y)$ is finite. Otherwise, $Y = b+Y$ and you can argue as rj7k8 above, but I guess there should be a direct argument using Riemann-Roch.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Achinger
            Apr 10 at 16:45













          8












          8








          8





          $begingroup$

          Yes. Since $Y$ embeds into its Jacobian $B$, it is enough to prove the statement for pairs of maps to an abelian variety $f, gcolon Xto B$ sending a base point $xin X$ to $0in B$. Every such map factors uniquely through the Albanese variety $A$ of $X$, so we reduce further to the case of pairs of maps $f, gcolon Ato B$ between abelian varieties (sending $0$ to $0$). Every such map is necessarily a group homomorphism, and is uniquely determined by what it does on $pi_1 = H_1$, or on $H^1(-, mathbfC)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Yes. Since $Y$ embeds into its Jacobian $B$, it is enough to prove the statement for pairs of maps to an abelian variety $f, gcolon Xto B$ sending a base point $xin X$ to $0in B$. Every such map factors uniquely through the Albanese variety $A$ of $X$, so we reduce further to the case of pairs of maps $f, gcolon Ato B$ between abelian varieties (sending $0$ to $0$). Every such map is necessarily a group homomorphism, and is uniquely determined by what it does on $pi_1 = H_1$, or on $H^1(-, mathbfC)$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Apr 9 at 23:01









          Piotr AchingerPiotr Achinger

          8,62212854




          8,62212854







          • 3




            $begingroup$
            It seems to me that you have not used that the genus of $Y$ is at least $2$ (which is certainly a necessary condition).
            $endgroup$
            – ulrich
            Apr 10 at 4:15






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @ulrich I think this condition is used implicitly in the first step. The argument after that point provides the equality $f=alpha circ g$ where $alpha:B rightarrow B$ is a translation, but genus $>1$ is needed to then conclude that $f=g$. I did this using that $alpha$ induces both the identity on cohomology and an automorphism of $Y$, and using the Lefschetz fixed point formula (maybe Piotr had something else in mind).
            $endgroup$
            – rj7k8
            Apr 10 at 16:22










          • $begingroup$
            @ulrich You are right, the argument works literally if $f$ and $g$ satisfy $f(x)=g(x)$. Without this assumption, it shows that $f$ and $g$ differ by a translation in $B$. So it remains to show that if $Y$ is a curve of genus $>1$ embedded in its Jacobian $B$, then for every $bin B$, $Ycap (b+Y)$ is finite. Otherwise, $Y = b+Y$ and you can argue as rj7k8 above, but I guess there should be a direct argument using Riemann-Roch.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Achinger
            Apr 10 at 16:45












          • 3




            $begingroup$
            It seems to me that you have not used that the genus of $Y$ is at least $2$ (which is certainly a necessary condition).
            $endgroup$
            – ulrich
            Apr 10 at 4:15






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @ulrich I think this condition is used implicitly in the first step. The argument after that point provides the equality $f=alpha circ g$ where $alpha:B rightarrow B$ is a translation, but genus $>1$ is needed to then conclude that $f=g$. I did this using that $alpha$ induces both the identity on cohomology and an automorphism of $Y$, and using the Lefschetz fixed point formula (maybe Piotr had something else in mind).
            $endgroup$
            – rj7k8
            Apr 10 at 16:22










          • $begingroup$
            @ulrich You are right, the argument works literally if $f$ and $g$ satisfy $f(x)=g(x)$. Without this assumption, it shows that $f$ and $g$ differ by a translation in $B$. So it remains to show that if $Y$ is a curve of genus $>1$ embedded in its Jacobian $B$, then for every $bin B$, $Ycap (b+Y)$ is finite. Otherwise, $Y = b+Y$ and you can argue as rj7k8 above, but I guess there should be a direct argument using Riemann-Roch.
            $endgroup$
            – Piotr Achinger
            Apr 10 at 16:45







          3




          3




          $begingroup$
          It seems to me that you have not used that the genus of $Y$ is at least $2$ (which is certainly a necessary condition).
          $endgroup$
          – ulrich
          Apr 10 at 4:15




          $begingroup$
          It seems to me that you have not used that the genus of $Y$ is at least $2$ (which is certainly a necessary condition).
          $endgroup$
          – ulrich
          Apr 10 at 4:15




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @ulrich I think this condition is used implicitly in the first step. The argument after that point provides the equality $f=alpha circ g$ where $alpha:B rightarrow B$ is a translation, but genus $>1$ is needed to then conclude that $f=g$. I did this using that $alpha$ induces both the identity on cohomology and an automorphism of $Y$, and using the Lefschetz fixed point formula (maybe Piotr had something else in mind).
          $endgroup$
          – rj7k8
          Apr 10 at 16:22




          $begingroup$
          @ulrich I think this condition is used implicitly in the first step. The argument after that point provides the equality $f=alpha circ g$ where $alpha:B rightarrow B$ is a translation, but genus $>1$ is needed to then conclude that $f=g$. I did this using that $alpha$ induces both the identity on cohomology and an automorphism of $Y$, and using the Lefschetz fixed point formula (maybe Piotr had something else in mind).
          $endgroup$
          – rj7k8
          Apr 10 at 16:22












          $begingroup$
          @ulrich You are right, the argument works literally if $f$ and $g$ satisfy $f(x)=g(x)$. Without this assumption, it shows that $f$ and $g$ differ by a translation in $B$. So it remains to show that if $Y$ is a curve of genus $>1$ embedded in its Jacobian $B$, then for every $bin B$, $Ycap (b+Y)$ is finite. Otherwise, $Y = b+Y$ and you can argue as rj7k8 above, but I guess there should be a direct argument using Riemann-Roch.
          $endgroup$
          – Piotr Achinger
          Apr 10 at 16:45




          $begingroup$
          @ulrich You are right, the argument works literally if $f$ and $g$ satisfy $f(x)=g(x)$. Without this assumption, it shows that $f$ and $g$ differ by a translation in $B$. So it remains to show that if $Y$ is a curve of genus $>1$ embedded in its Jacobian $B$, then for every $bin B$, $Ycap (b+Y)$ is finite. Otherwise, $Y = b+Y$ and you can argue as rj7k8 above, but I guess there should be a direct argument using Riemann-Roch.
          $endgroup$
          – Piotr Achinger
          Apr 10 at 16:45

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f327615%2fcan-distinct-morphisms-between-curves-induce-the-same-morphism-on-singular-cohom%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Sum ergo cogito? 1 nng

          三茅街道4182Guuntc Dn precexpngmageondP