Advertise all static route except the default gateway with Juniper SRX firewallBGP remote-triggered blackhole (RTBH) filter for JuniperJunos: Policy-Statment and AS-PrependsQuagga not announcing external routes over ibgp sessionBGP Route installed in routing table seen as valid but not as bestBGP and Inter-VRF RoutingWhy there is no advertised route to a neighbor on Cisco ISR?vSRX : several public addresses on loopback interfacebird set bgp next hop self in filterHow does a route-map applied as outbound on a neighbor sees the redistributed ospf routes into bgp? Local or external?How does BGP decide which prefix to advertise out of the prefixes in the routing table?
How did Doctor Strange see the winning outcome in Avengers: Infinity War?
How to pronounce the slash sign
Is `x >> pure y` equivalent to `liftM (const y) x`
A particular customize with green line and letters for subfloat
Pre-amplifier input protection
Failed to fetch jessie backports repository
Opposite of a diet
Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it?
Avoiding estate tax by giving multiple gifts
How to Reset Passwords on Multiple Websites Easily?
How long to clear the 'suck zone' of a turbofan after start is initiated?
Sequence of Tenses: Translating the subjunctive
What is the best translation for "slot" in the context of multiplayer video games?
Is there a problem with hiding "forgot password" until it's needed?
Is there a good way to store credentials outside of a password manager?
Would a virus be able to change eye and hair colour?
Why not increase contact surface when reentering the atmosphere?
Sort a list by elements of another list
Tiptoe or tiphoof? Adjusting words to better fit fantasy races
Closest Prime Number
Is exact Kanji stroke length important?
What is the intuitive meaning of having a linear relationship between the logs of two variables?
Why are there no referendums in the US?
Why, precisely, is argon used in neutrino experiments?
Advertise all static route except the default gateway with Juniper SRX firewall
BGP remote-triggered blackhole (RTBH) filter for JuniperJunos: Policy-Statment and AS-PrependsQuagga not announcing external routes over ibgp sessionBGP Route installed in routing table seen as valid but not as bestBGP and Inter-VRF RoutingWhy there is no advertised route to a neighbor on Cisco ISR?vSRX : several public addresses on loopback interfacebird set bgp next hop self in filterHow does a route-map applied as outbound on a neighbor sees the redistributed ospf routes into bgp? Local or external?How does BGP decide which prefix to advertise out of the prefixes in the routing table?
With the following policy, all static routes are advertised via BGP to my neighbor:
root@Nitrogen# show policy-options
policy-statement bgp-export-policy
term export-statics
from protocol static;
then accept;
root@Nitrogen# show routing-instances myinstance
instance-type virtual-router;
interface ...
routing-options
static
route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop ...; # I don't want to send this route
route x.x.x.x next-hop st0.1;
route x.x.x.x next-hop st0.1;
route x.x.x.x next-hop st0.1;
...
autonomous-system XXX;
protocols
bgp
group mygroup
type external;
export bgp-export-policy;
neighbor XXX
peer-as XXX;
How could I advertise all static routes except the default 0.0.0.0/0 one? Or, if this is easier, how could I advertise all routes that use st0.1
as the next hop?
Thank you in advance for your help.
routing bgp juniper juniper-junos juniper-srx
add a comment |
With the following policy, all static routes are advertised via BGP to my neighbor:
root@Nitrogen# show policy-options
policy-statement bgp-export-policy
term export-statics
from protocol static;
then accept;
root@Nitrogen# show routing-instances myinstance
instance-type virtual-router;
interface ...
routing-options
static
route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop ...; # I don't want to send this route
route x.x.x.x next-hop st0.1;
route x.x.x.x next-hop st0.1;
route x.x.x.x next-hop st0.1;
...
autonomous-system XXX;
protocols
bgp
group mygroup
type external;
export bgp-export-policy;
neighbor XXX
peer-as XXX;
How could I advertise all static routes except the default 0.0.0.0/0 one? Or, if this is easier, how could I advertise all routes that use st0.1
as the next hop?
Thank you in advance for your help.
routing bgp juniper juniper-junos juniper-srx
add a comment |
With the following policy, all static routes are advertised via BGP to my neighbor:
root@Nitrogen# show policy-options
policy-statement bgp-export-policy
term export-statics
from protocol static;
then accept;
root@Nitrogen# show routing-instances myinstance
instance-type virtual-router;
interface ...
routing-options
static
route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop ...; # I don't want to send this route
route x.x.x.x next-hop st0.1;
route x.x.x.x next-hop st0.1;
route x.x.x.x next-hop st0.1;
...
autonomous-system XXX;
protocols
bgp
group mygroup
type external;
export bgp-export-policy;
neighbor XXX
peer-as XXX;
How could I advertise all static routes except the default 0.0.0.0/0 one? Or, if this is easier, how could I advertise all routes that use st0.1
as the next hop?
Thank you in advance for your help.
routing bgp juniper juniper-junos juniper-srx
With the following policy, all static routes are advertised via BGP to my neighbor:
root@Nitrogen# show policy-options
policy-statement bgp-export-policy
term export-statics
from protocol static;
then accept;
root@Nitrogen# show routing-instances myinstance
instance-type virtual-router;
interface ...
routing-options
static
route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop ...; # I don't want to send this route
route x.x.x.x next-hop st0.1;
route x.x.x.x next-hop st0.1;
route x.x.x.x next-hop st0.1;
...
autonomous-system XXX;
protocols
bgp
group mygroup
type external;
export bgp-export-policy;
neighbor XXX
peer-as XXX;
How could I advertise all static routes except the default 0.0.0.0/0 one? Or, if this is easier, how could I advertise all routes that use st0.1
as the next hop?
Thank you in advance for your help.
routing bgp juniper juniper-junos juniper-srx
routing bgp juniper juniper-junos juniper-srx
edited yesterday
Nakrule
asked yesterday
NakruleNakrule
19516
19516
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You need to add a term to your policy statement which explicitly rejects the default route then, and add that before the export-statics
term:
policy-statement bgp-export-policy {
term reject-default
from
route-filter 0.0.0.0/0 through 0.0.0.0/32;
then reject;
term export-statics
from protocol static;
then accept;
Another, slightly more complex, but also more versatile way is to tag the routes you want to export with a chosen community, and then write an export policy which accepts only routes with that specific community and rejects all others:
routing-options
static
route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 192.0.2.1;
route x.x.x.x
next-hop st0.1;
community 64496:1000;
route x.x.x.x
next-hop st0.1;
community 64496:1000;
route x.x.x.x
next-hop st0.1;
community 64496:1000;
policy-statement bgp-export-policy
term export-routes
from
protocol static;
community 64496:1000;
then accept;
term reject
then reject;
Having an explicit reject policy at the end of your policy chain is always a good idea, regardless of how you would implement this.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "496"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f58011%2fadvertise-all-static-route-except-the-default-gateway-with-juniper-srx-firewall%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You need to add a term to your policy statement which explicitly rejects the default route then, and add that before the export-statics
term:
policy-statement bgp-export-policy {
term reject-default
from
route-filter 0.0.0.0/0 through 0.0.0.0/32;
then reject;
term export-statics
from protocol static;
then accept;
Another, slightly more complex, but also more versatile way is to tag the routes you want to export with a chosen community, and then write an export policy which accepts only routes with that specific community and rejects all others:
routing-options
static
route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 192.0.2.1;
route x.x.x.x
next-hop st0.1;
community 64496:1000;
route x.x.x.x
next-hop st0.1;
community 64496:1000;
route x.x.x.x
next-hop st0.1;
community 64496:1000;
policy-statement bgp-export-policy
term export-routes
from
protocol static;
community 64496:1000;
then accept;
term reject
then reject;
Having an explicit reject policy at the end of your policy chain is always a good idea, regardless of how you would implement this.
add a comment |
You need to add a term to your policy statement which explicitly rejects the default route then, and add that before the export-statics
term:
policy-statement bgp-export-policy {
term reject-default
from
route-filter 0.0.0.0/0 through 0.0.0.0/32;
then reject;
term export-statics
from protocol static;
then accept;
Another, slightly more complex, but also more versatile way is to tag the routes you want to export with a chosen community, and then write an export policy which accepts only routes with that specific community and rejects all others:
routing-options
static
route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 192.0.2.1;
route x.x.x.x
next-hop st0.1;
community 64496:1000;
route x.x.x.x
next-hop st0.1;
community 64496:1000;
route x.x.x.x
next-hop st0.1;
community 64496:1000;
policy-statement bgp-export-policy
term export-routes
from
protocol static;
community 64496:1000;
then accept;
term reject
then reject;
Having an explicit reject policy at the end of your policy chain is always a good idea, regardless of how you would implement this.
add a comment |
You need to add a term to your policy statement which explicitly rejects the default route then, and add that before the export-statics
term:
policy-statement bgp-export-policy {
term reject-default
from
route-filter 0.0.0.0/0 through 0.0.0.0/32;
then reject;
term export-statics
from protocol static;
then accept;
Another, slightly more complex, but also more versatile way is to tag the routes you want to export with a chosen community, and then write an export policy which accepts only routes with that specific community and rejects all others:
routing-options
static
route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 192.0.2.1;
route x.x.x.x
next-hop st0.1;
community 64496:1000;
route x.x.x.x
next-hop st0.1;
community 64496:1000;
route x.x.x.x
next-hop st0.1;
community 64496:1000;
policy-statement bgp-export-policy
term export-routes
from
protocol static;
community 64496:1000;
then accept;
term reject
then reject;
Having an explicit reject policy at the end of your policy chain is always a good idea, regardless of how you would implement this.
You need to add a term to your policy statement which explicitly rejects the default route then, and add that before the export-statics
term:
policy-statement bgp-export-policy {
term reject-default
from
route-filter 0.0.0.0/0 through 0.0.0.0/32;
then reject;
term export-statics
from protocol static;
then accept;
Another, slightly more complex, but also more versatile way is to tag the routes you want to export with a chosen community, and then write an export policy which accepts only routes with that specific community and rejects all others:
routing-options
static
route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 192.0.2.1;
route x.x.x.x
next-hop st0.1;
community 64496:1000;
route x.x.x.x
next-hop st0.1;
community 64496:1000;
route x.x.x.x
next-hop st0.1;
community 64496:1000;
policy-statement bgp-export-policy
term export-routes
from
protocol static;
community 64496:1000;
then accept;
term reject
then reject;
Having an explicit reject policy at the end of your policy chain is always a good idea, regardless of how you would implement this.
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Teun Vink♦Teun Vink
12k53154
12k53154
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Network Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f58011%2fadvertise-all-static-route-except-the-default-gateway-with-juniper-srx-firewall%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown