What is the difference between IR and ND filters? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InIs it possible to do infrared photography with digital cameras?Infrared photography—why are green leaves not appearing as white?Are there types of photography centered around wavelengths other than IR or visible light?Whats the difference between Singh-Ray Vari-ND and cheap Fader-ND filters?How does the sensitivity of camera sensor behaves with the infrared filters?Does the Canon 60Da offer significant advantage over 60D with infrared filter for astrophotography?At what focal length can I expect vignetting with Cokin Z-Pro ND filters and a Tokina 11-16mm lens?What is the difference between cheaper and more expensive ND filters?Are these images from infrared film?What are the advantages of an 830nm infrared filter, in comparison to 720nm?What differences should be expected between SFX200 and Rollei IR 400?Infrared photography—why are green leaves not appearing as white?How to avoid overexposed and red/blue tinted infrared images with Sigma SD14?

Limit the amount of RAM Mathematica may access?

Geography at the pixel level

Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?

JSON.serialize: is it possible to suppress null values of a map?

I looked up a future colleague on LinkedIn before I started a job. I told my colleague about it and he seemed surprised. Should I apologize?

Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?

Extreme, unacceptable situation and I can't attend work tomorrow morning

If the Wish spell is used to duplicate the effect of Simulacrum, are existing duplicates destroyed?

Why can Shazam do this?

Is three citations per paragraph excessive for undergraduate research paper?

How can I create a character who can assume the widest possible range of creature sizes?

Manuscript was "unsubmitted" because the manuscript was deposited in Arxiv Preprints

Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"

What does "sndry explns" mean in one of the Hitchhiker's guide books?

Which Sci-Fi work first showed weapon of galactic-scale mass destruction?

How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect

Inversion Puzzle

Why isn't airport relocation done gradually?

How long do I have to send payment?

Lethal sonic weapons

It's possible to achieve negative score?

Pristine Bit Checking

Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?

aging parents with no investments



What is the difference between IR and ND filters?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InIs it possible to do infrared photography with digital cameras?Infrared photography—why are green leaves not appearing as white?Are there types of photography centered around wavelengths other than IR or visible light?Whats the difference between Singh-Ray Vari-ND and cheap Fader-ND filters?How does the sensitivity of camera sensor behaves with the infrared filters?Does the Canon 60Da offer significant advantage over 60D with infrared filter for astrophotography?At what focal length can I expect vignetting with Cokin Z-Pro ND filters and a Tokina 11-16mm lens?What is the difference between cheaper and more expensive ND filters?Are these images from infrared film?What are the advantages of an 830nm infrared filter, in comparison to 720nm?What differences should be expected between SFX200 and Rollei IR 400?Infrared photography—why are green leaves not appearing as white?How to avoid overexposed and red/blue tinted infrared images with Sigma SD14?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















What is the difference between an infrared filter and an ND filter? I have a big stopper and I would like to take some images to show the infrared spectrum I have seen images where green foliage shows up red and any heat source shown up white §Is there any lens filter recommended for this genre of photography










share|improve this question









New contributor




tblane2 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1





    Possible duplicate of Is it possible to do infrared photography with digital cameras?

    – scottbb
    Apr 6 at 0:51











  • Possible duplicate of Are there types of photography centered around wavelengths other than IR or visible light?

    – xiota
    2 days ago

















3















What is the difference between an infrared filter and an ND filter? I have a big stopper and I would like to take some images to show the infrared spectrum I have seen images where green foliage shows up red and any heat source shown up white §Is there any lens filter recommended for this genre of photography










share|improve this question









New contributor




tblane2 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1





    Possible duplicate of Is it possible to do infrared photography with digital cameras?

    – scottbb
    Apr 6 at 0:51











  • Possible duplicate of Are there types of photography centered around wavelengths other than IR or visible light?

    – xiota
    2 days ago













3












3








3








What is the difference between an infrared filter and an ND filter? I have a big stopper and I would like to take some images to show the infrared spectrum I have seen images where green foliage shows up red and any heat source shown up white §Is there any lens filter recommended for this genre of photography










share|improve this question









New contributor




tblane2 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












What is the difference between an infrared filter and an ND filter? I have a big stopper and I would like to take some images to show the infrared spectrum I have seen images where green foliage shows up red and any heat source shown up white §Is there any lens filter recommended for this genre of photography







neutral-density infrared






share|improve this question









New contributor




tblane2 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




tblane2 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 6 at 6:28









xiota

11.7k41863




11.7k41863






New contributor




tblane2 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Apr 5 at 21:29









tblane2tblane2

161




161




New contributor




tblane2 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





tblane2 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






tblane2 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1





    Possible duplicate of Is it possible to do infrared photography with digital cameras?

    – scottbb
    Apr 6 at 0:51











  • Possible duplicate of Are there types of photography centered around wavelengths other than IR or visible light?

    – xiota
    2 days ago












  • 1





    Possible duplicate of Is it possible to do infrared photography with digital cameras?

    – scottbb
    Apr 6 at 0:51











  • Possible duplicate of Are there types of photography centered around wavelengths other than IR or visible light?

    – xiota
    2 days ago







1




1





Possible duplicate of Is it possible to do infrared photography with digital cameras?

– scottbb
Apr 6 at 0:51





Possible duplicate of Is it possible to do infrared photography with digital cameras?

– scottbb
Apr 6 at 0:51













Possible duplicate of Are there types of photography centered around wavelengths other than IR or visible light?

– xiota
2 days ago





Possible duplicate of Are there types of photography centered around wavelengths other than IR or visible light?

– xiota
2 days ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5














ND stands for "neutral density" - it is a filter type that (in theory) absorbs all wavelengths of the visible light by the same amount.



enter image description here



Effect of a ND-filter. CC-BY-SA 2.0: Robert Emperley




IR filters filter out all but certain wavelengths - the (near) IR wavelength of the filter. So basically, they are IR-pass filters, not IR-block filters. Thanks @TheLuckless!



As @Hueco states in his comment, IR filters will cut everything below a certain value. That value might be between 650 and 720nm - visible light, however, does go up to 750nm. Thanks for clarifying that, Hueco!



enter image description here



Typical result of using an IR filter. Some effort was put into post-production: The red and blue channels were swapped. CC-BY-SA 2.0:
Jannis




What you think of (white heat source, everything else red-ish) is most probably a thermographic camera - they differ from regular cameras in a lot of ways, including lenses that are (typically) made out of Germanium.



enter image description here



Thermographic image. CC-BY-SA 3.0: Lutz Weidner






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    It's important to note that most IR filters block somewhere between 650nm and 720nm and below. Important because visible light goes up to ~750nm.

    – Hueco
    Apr 5 at 21:50











  • @Hueco Is there something you do not know better than me? :D In all seriousness, though: Will include that ASAP - just looking for some CC-BY-SA sample pictures for the respective categories.

    – flolilo
    Apr 5 at 21:52











  • lol. I just happened to start looking at getting a camera converted by the folks at life pixel (many hours spent researching this topic). I'm just not sure if I want to send in the 60D or get a cheap used Rebel for the job. I do love my film, but when it comes to IR shooting, digital wins hands down

    – Hueco
    Apr 5 at 21:56







  • 1





    @TheLuckless Hopefully I integrated the information from your comment so that this is more clear now - thanks for the tip!

    – flolilo
    Apr 5 at 22:20






  • 1





    @flolilo – OVF is useless with IR. When I had an IR-converted Rebel, there was no consistent exposure compensation that would work. Autofocus didn't work. Had to use Live View and manual focus to get reasonable results. Mirrorless with LCD or EVF would work better.

    – xiota
    Apr 6 at 6:22











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "61"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






tblane2 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106401%2fwhat-is-the-difference-between-ir-and-nd-filters%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5














ND stands for "neutral density" - it is a filter type that (in theory) absorbs all wavelengths of the visible light by the same amount.



enter image description here



Effect of a ND-filter. CC-BY-SA 2.0: Robert Emperley




IR filters filter out all but certain wavelengths - the (near) IR wavelength of the filter. So basically, they are IR-pass filters, not IR-block filters. Thanks @TheLuckless!



As @Hueco states in his comment, IR filters will cut everything below a certain value. That value might be between 650 and 720nm - visible light, however, does go up to 750nm. Thanks for clarifying that, Hueco!



enter image description here



Typical result of using an IR filter. Some effort was put into post-production: The red and blue channels were swapped. CC-BY-SA 2.0:
Jannis




What you think of (white heat source, everything else red-ish) is most probably a thermographic camera - they differ from regular cameras in a lot of ways, including lenses that are (typically) made out of Germanium.



enter image description here



Thermographic image. CC-BY-SA 3.0: Lutz Weidner






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    It's important to note that most IR filters block somewhere between 650nm and 720nm and below. Important because visible light goes up to ~750nm.

    – Hueco
    Apr 5 at 21:50











  • @Hueco Is there something you do not know better than me? :D In all seriousness, though: Will include that ASAP - just looking for some CC-BY-SA sample pictures for the respective categories.

    – flolilo
    Apr 5 at 21:52











  • lol. I just happened to start looking at getting a camera converted by the folks at life pixel (many hours spent researching this topic). I'm just not sure if I want to send in the 60D or get a cheap used Rebel for the job. I do love my film, but when it comes to IR shooting, digital wins hands down

    – Hueco
    Apr 5 at 21:56







  • 1





    @TheLuckless Hopefully I integrated the information from your comment so that this is more clear now - thanks for the tip!

    – flolilo
    Apr 5 at 22:20






  • 1





    @flolilo – OVF is useless with IR. When I had an IR-converted Rebel, there was no consistent exposure compensation that would work. Autofocus didn't work. Had to use Live View and manual focus to get reasonable results. Mirrorless with LCD or EVF would work better.

    – xiota
    Apr 6 at 6:22















5














ND stands for "neutral density" - it is a filter type that (in theory) absorbs all wavelengths of the visible light by the same amount.



enter image description here



Effect of a ND-filter. CC-BY-SA 2.0: Robert Emperley




IR filters filter out all but certain wavelengths - the (near) IR wavelength of the filter. So basically, they are IR-pass filters, not IR-block filters. Thanks @TheLuckless!



As @Hueco states in his comment, IR filters will cut everything below a certain value. That value might be between 650 and 720nm - visible light, however, does go up to 750nm. Thanks for clarifying that, Hueco!



enter image description here



Typical result of using an IR filter. Some effort was put into post-production: The red and blue channels were swapped. CC-BY-SA 2.0:
Jannis




What you think of (white heat source, everything else red-ish) is most probably a thermographic camera - they differ from regular cameras in a lot of ways, including lenses that are (typically) made out of Germanium.



enter image description here



Thermographic image. CC-BY-SA 3.0: Lutz Weidner






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    It's important to note that most IR filters block somewhere between 650nm and 720nm and below. Important because visible light goes up to ~750nm.

    – Hueco
    Apr 5 at 21:50











  • @Hueco Is there something you do not know better than me? :D In all seriousness, though: Will include that ASAP - just looking for some CC-BY-SA sample pictures for the respective categories.

    – flolilo
    Apr 5 at 21:52











  • lol. I just happened to start looking at getting a camera converted by the folks at life pixel (many hours spent researching this topic). I'm just not sure if I want to send in the 60D or get a cheap used Rebel for the job. I do love my film, but when it comes to IR shooting, digital wins hands down

    – Hueco
    Apr 5 at 21:56







  • 1





    @TheLuckless Hopefully I integrated the information from your comment so that this is more clear now - thanks for the tip!

    – flolilo
    Apr 5 at 22:20






  • 1





    @flolilo – OVF is useless with IR. When I had an IR-converted Rebel, there was no consistent exposure compensation that would work. Autofocus didn't work. Had to use Live View and manual focus to get reasonable results. Mirrorless with LCD or EVF would work better.

    – xiota
    Apr 6 at 6:22













5












5








5







ND stands for "neutral density" - it is a filter type that (in theory) absorbs all wavelengths of the visible light by the same amount.



enter image description here



Effect of a ND-filter. CC-BY-SA 2.0: Robert Emperley




IR filters filter out all but certain wavelengths - the (near) IR wavelength of the filter. So basically, they are IR-pass filters, not IR-block filters. Thanks @TheLuckless!



As @Hueco states in his comment, IR filters will cut everything below a certain value. That value might be between 650 and 720nm - visible light, however, does go up to 750nm. Thanks for clarifying that, Hueco!



enter image description here



Typical result of using an IR filter. Some effort was put into post-production: The red and blue channels were swapped. CC-BY-SA 2.0:
Jannis




What you think of (white heat source, everything else red-ish) is most probably a thermographic camera - they differ from regular cameras in a lot of ways, including lenses that are (typically) made out of Germanium.



enter image description here



Thermographic image. CC-BY-SA 3.0: Lutz Weidner






share|improve this answer















ND stands for "neutral density" - it is a filter type that (in theory) absorbs all wavelengths of the visible light by the same amount.



enter image description here



Effect of a ND-filter. CC-BY-SA 2.0: Robert Emperley




IR filters filter out all but certain wavelengths - the (near) IR wavelength of the filter. So basically, they are IR-pass filters, not IR-block filters. Thanks @TheLuckless!



As @Hueco states in his comment, IR filters will cut everything below a certain value. That value might be between 650 and 720nm - visible light, however, does go up to 750nm. Thanks for clarifying that, Hueco!



enter image description here



Typical result of using an IR filter. Some effort was put into post-production: The red and blue channels were swapped. CC-BY-SA 2.0:
Jannis




What you think of (white heat source, everything else red-ish) is most probably a thermographic camera - they differ from regular cameras in a lot of ways, including lenses that are (typically) made out of Germanium.



enter image description here



Thermographic image. CC-BY-SA 3.0: Lutz Weidner







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Apr 5 at 22:48

























answered Apr 5 at 21:44









floliloflolilo

5,33811838




5,33811838







  • 1





    It's important to note that most IR filters block somewhere between 650nm and 720nm and below. Important because visible light goes up to ~750nm.

    – Hueco
    Apr 5 at 21:50











  • @Hueco Is there something you do not know better than me? :D In all seriousness, though: Will include that ASAP - just looking for some CC-BY-SA sample pictures for the respective categories.

    – flolilo
    Apr 5 at 21:52











  • lol. I just happened to start looking at getting a camera converted by the folks at life pixel (many hours spent researching this topic). I'm just not sure if I want to send in the 60D or get a cheap used Rebel for the job. I do love my film, but when it comes to IR shooting, digital wins hands down

    – Hueco
    Apr 5 at 21:56







  • 1





    @TheLuckless Hopefully I integrated the information from your comment so that this is more clear now - thanks for the tip!

    – flolilo
    Apr 5 at 22:20






  • 1





    @flolilo – OVF is useless with IR. When I had an IR-converted Rebel, there was no consistent exposure compensation that would work. Autofocus didn't work. Had to use Live View and manual focus to get reasonable results. Mirrorless with LCD or EVF would work better.

    – xiota
    Apr 6 at 6:22












  • 1





    It's important to note that most IR filters block somewhere between 650nm and 720nm and below. Important because visible light goes up to ~750nm.

    – Hueco
    Apr 5 at 21:50











  • @Hueco Is there something you do not know better than me? :D In all seriousness, though: Will include that ASAP - just looking for some CC-BY-SA sample pictures for the respective categories.

    – flolilo
    Apr 5 at 21:52











  • lol. I just happened to start looking at getting a camera converted by the folks at life pixel (many hours spent researching this topic). I'm just not sure if I want to send in the 60D or get a cheap used Rebel for the job. I do love my film, but when it comes to IR shooting, digital wins hands down

    – Hueco
    Apr 5 at 21:56







  • 1





    @TheLuckless Hopefully I integrated the information from your comment so that this is more clear now - thanks for the tip!

    – flolilo
    Apr 5 at 22:20






  • 1





    @flolilo – OVF is useless with IR. When I had an IR-converted Rebel, there was no consistent exposure compensation that would work. Autofocus didn't work. Had to use Live View and manual focus to get reasonable results. Mirrorless with LCD or EVF would work better.

    – xiota
    Apr 6 at 6:22







1




1





It's important to note that most IR filters block somewhere between 650nm and 720nm and below. Important because visible light goes up to ~750nm.

– Hueco
Apr 5 at 21:50





It's important to note that most IR filters block somewhere between 650nm and 720nm and below. Important because visible light goes up to ~750nm.

– Hueco
Apr 5 at 21:50













@Hueco Is there something you do not know better than me? :D In all seriousness, though: Will include that ASAP - just looking for some CC-BY-SA sample pictures for the respective categories.

– flolilo
Apr 5 at 21:52





@Hueco Is there something you do not know better than me? :D In all seriousness, though: Will include that ASAP - just looking for some CC-BY-SA sample pictures for the respective categories.

– flolilo
Apr 5 at 21:52













lol. I just happened to start looking at getting a camera converted by the folks at life pixel (many hours spent researching this topic). I'm just not sure if I want to send in the 60D or get a cheap used Rebel for the job. I do love my film, but when it comes to IR shooting, digital wins hands down

– Hueco
Apr 5 at 21:56






lol. I just happened to start looking at getting a camera converted by the folks at life pixel (many hours spent researching this topic). I'm just not sure if I want to send in the 60D or get a cheap used Rebel for the job. I do love my film, but when it comes to IR shooting, digital wins hands down

– Hueco
Apr 5 at 21:56





1




1





@TheLuckless Hopefully I integrated the information from your comment so that this is more clear now - thanks for the tip!

– flolilo
Apr 5 at 22:20





@TheLuckless Hopefully I integrated the information from your comment so that this is more clear now - thanks for the tip!

– flolilo
Apr 5 at 22:20




1




1





@flolilo – OVF is useless with IR. When I had an IR-converted Rebel, there was no consistent exposure compensation that would work. Autofocus didn't work. Had to use Live View and manual focus to get reasonable results. Mirrorless with LCD or EVF would work better.

– xiota
Apr 6 at 6:22





@flolilo – OVF is useless with IR. When I had an IR-converted Rebel, there was no consistent exposure compensation that would work. Autofocus didn't work. Had to use Live View and manual focus to get reasonable results. Mirrorless with LCD or EVF would work better.

– xiota
Apr 6 at 6:22










tblane2 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















tblane2 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












tblane2 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











tblane2 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106401%2fwhat-is-the-difference-between-ir-and-nd-filters%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Sum ergo cogito? 1 nng

419 nièngy_Soadمي 19bal1.5o_g

Queiggey Chernihivv 9NnOo i Zw X QqKk LpB