LaTeX: Why are digits allowed in environments, but forbidden in commands? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhat exactly do csname and endcsname do?Why are some characters not allowed in command sequencesWhy does LaTeX make a distinction between commands and environments?Do all starred commands have anything in common?Why are some characters not allowed in command sequencesSuggestions for an automatic taxonomy environmentUse a character other than the backslash for commandsWhy are LaTeX macros so inconsistent?Are end… macro names reserved in LaTeX2e?Can't use command with square brackets in matrix environmentHow to control conditional statements within new commands and environmentsCreating Commands which Make New Environments

Pristine Bit Checking

Why could you hear an Amstrad CPC working?

Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?

Should I use my personal or workplace e-mail when registering to external websites for work purpose?

Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?

How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?

Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?

It's possible to achieve negative score?

What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation

What does "rabbited" mean/imply in this sentence?

Spanish for "widget"

Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"

Could JWST stay at L2 "forever"?

Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?

Why can Shazam do this?

Where does the "burst of radiance" from Holy Weapon originate?

Confusion about non-derivable continuous functions

Patience, young "Padovan"

Does duplicating a spell with Wish count as casting that spell?

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?

How to reverse every other sublist of a list?

Realistic Alternatives to Dust: What Else Could Feed a Plankton Bloom?

aging parents with no investments



LaTeX: Why are digits allowed in environments, but forbidden in commands?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhat exactly do csname and endcsname do?Why are some characters not allowed in command sequencesWhy does LaTeX make a distinction between commands and environments?Do all starred commands have anything in common?Why are some characters not allowed in command sequencesSuggestions for an automatic taxonomy environmentUse a character other than the backslash for commandsWhy are LaTeX macros so inconsistent?Are end… macro names reserved in LaTeX2e?Can't use command with square brackets in matrix environmentHow to control conditional statements within new commands and environmentsCreating Commands which Make New Environments










3















Finding out that I can have an environment named env2, but no command cmd2, I read Why are some characters not allowed in command sequences, but still I wonder:



Why are digits allowed in environments, but forbidden in commands? In my understanding digits delimit command names (inherited from plain TeX), but why doesn't that restriction apply to environments? Wouldn't it have been more consistent to forbid digits in environment names as well?










share|improve this question






















  • You actually can use numbers in commands. If you do expandafterdefcsname mycommandwithanumber123456endcsname you'll define a command mycommandwithanumber123456. The environments are created using the csname...endcsname pair, so it's fine.

    – Phelype Oleinik
    Apr 5 at 22:36











  • expandafterdefcsname macro2endcsnamecommand output is valid syntax. You then must use it via csname macro2endcsname.

    – Steven B. Segletes
    Apr 5 at 22:36












  • So the answer is "There are not forbidden, but they have to be used in a special way. Still it's recommended not to use them."?

    – U. Windl
    Apr 5 at 22:41















3















Finding out that I can have an environment named env2, but no command cmd2, I read Why are some characters not allowed in command sequences, but still I wonder:



Why are digits allowed in environments, but forbidden in commands? In my understanding digits delimit command names (inherited from plain TeX), but why doesn't that restriction apply to environments? Wouldn't it have been more consistent to forbid digits in environment names as well?










share|improve this question






















  • You actually can use numbers in commands. If you do expandafterdefcsname mycommandwithanumber123456endcsname you'll define a command mycommandwithanumber123456. The environments are created using the csname...endcsname pair, so it's fine.

    – Phelype Oleinik
    Apr 5 at 22:36











  • expandafterdefcsname macro2endcsnamecommand output is valid syntax. You then must use it via csname macro2endcsname.

    – Steven B. Segletes
    Apr 5 at 22:36












  • So the answer is "There are not forbidden, but they have to be used in a special way. Still it's recommended not to use them."?

    – U. Windl
    Apr 5 at 22:41













3












3








3


1






Finding out that I can have an environment named env2, but no command cmd2, I read Why are some characters not allowed in command sequences, but still I wonder:



Why are digits allowed in environments, but forbidden in commands? In my understanding digits delimit command names (inherited from plain TeX), but why doesn't that restriction apply to environments? Wouldn't it have been more consistent to forbid digits in environment names as well?










share|improve this question














Finding out that I can have an environment named env2, but no command cmd2, I read Why are some characters not allowed in command sequences, but still I wonder:



Why are digits allowed in environments, but forbidden in commands? In my understanding digits delimit command names (inherited from plain TeX), but why doesn't that restriction apply to environments? Wouldn't it have been more consistent to forbid digits in environment names as well?







macros environments






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Apr 5 at 22:32









U. WindlU. Windl

1718




1718












  • You actually can use numbers in commands. If you do expandafterdefcsname mycommandwithanumber123456endcsname you'll define a command mycommandwithanumber123456. The environments are created using the csname...endcsname pair, so it's fine.

    – Phelype Oleinik
    Apr 5 at 22:36











  • expandafterdefcsname macro2endcsnamecommand output is valid syntax. You then must use it via csname macro2endcsname.

    – Steven B. Segletes
    Apr 5 at 22:36












  • So the answer is "There are not forbidden, but they have to be used in a special way. Still it's recommended not to use them."?

    – U. Windl
    Apr 5 at 22:41

















  • You actually can use numbers in commands. If you do expandafterdefcsname mycommandwithanumber123456endcsname you'll define a command mycommandwithanumber123456. The environments are created using the csname...endcsname pair, so it's fine.

    – Phelype Oleinik
    Apr 5 at 22:36











  • expandafterdefcsname macro2endcsnamecommand output is valid syntax. You then must use it via csname macro2endcsname.

    – Steven B. Segletes
    Apr 5 at 22:36












  • So the answer is "There are not forbidden, but they have to be used in a special way. Still it's recommended not to use them."?

    – U. Windl
    Apr 5 at 22:41
















You actually can use numbers in commands. If you do expandafterdefcsname mycommandwithanumber123456endcsname you'll define a command mycommandwithanumber123456. The environments are created using the csname...endcsname pair, so it's fine.

– Phelype Oleinik
Apr 5 at 22:36





You actually can use numbers in commands. If you do expandafterdefcsname mycommandwithanumber123456endcsname you'll define a command mycommandwithanumber123456. The environments are created using the csname...endcsname pair, so it's fine.

– Phelype Oleinik
Apr 5 at 22:36













expandafterdefcsname macro2endcsnamecommand output is valid syntax. You then must use it via csname macro2endcsname.

– Steven B. Segletes
Apr 5 at 22:36






expandafterdefcsname macro2endcsnamecommand output is valid syntax. You then must use it via csname macro2endcsname.

– Steven B. Segletes
Apr 5 at 22:36














So the answer is "There are not forbidden, but they have to be used in a special way. Still it's recommended not to use them."?

– U. Windl
Apr 5 at 22:41





So the answer is "There are not forbidden, but they have to be used in a special way. Still it's recommended not to use them."?

– U. Windl
Apr 5 at 22:41










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















8














The restriction is in the scanner, tex's "eyes" in the texbook terminology. Any sequence of characters may be used as a command name, however after a character of catcode 0 (normally ) then tex scans the next non-letter (character of catcode other than 11) or a contiguous sequence of letters, and tokenizes it as a single csname token.



This means that foo123 normally parses as the token foo followed by the three tokens 1, 2, 3. Unless you make digits catcode 11. Similarly section* is normally the token section followed by the token *.



environment names use do not require to parse the name via the escape character, (they use the csname primitive but that's an implementation detail so begintabular accesses tabular but begintabular* accesses the command with name tabular* (not the two tokens that would normally be generated by parsing tabular*).



So technically it would be quite hard to not allow digits (or other characters) in environment names, especially when latex was designed there was not the memory available to add that kind of character-by-character check.






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483440%2flatex-why-are-digits-allowed-in-environments-but-forbidden-in-commands%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8














    The restriction is in the scanner, tex's "eyes" in the texbook terminology. Any sequence of characters may be used as a command name, however after a character of catcode 0 (normally ) then tex scans the next non-letter (character of catcode other than 11) or a contiguous sequence of letters, and tokenizes it as a single csname token.



    This means that foo123 normally parses as the token foo followed by the three tokens 1, 2, 3. Unless you make digits catcode 11. Similarly section* is normally the token section followed by the token *.



    environment names use do not require to parse the name via the escape character, (they use the csname primitive but that's an implementation detail so begintabular accesses tabular but begintabular* accesses the command with name tabular* (not the two tokens that would normally be generated by parsing tabular*).



    So technically it would be quite hard to not allow digits (or other characters) in environment names, especially when latex was designed there was not the memory available to add that kind of character-by-character check.






    share|improve this answer





























      8














      The restriction is in the scanner, tex's "eyes" in the texbook terminology. Any sequence of characters may be used as a command name, however after a character of catcode 0 (normally ) then tex scans the next non-letter (character of catcode other than 11) or a contiguous sequence of letters, and tokenizes it as a single csname token.



      This means that foo123 normally parses as the token foo followed by the three tokens 1, 2, 3. Unless you make digits catcode 11. Similarly section* is normally the token section followed by the token *.



      environment names use do not require to parse the name via the escape character, (they use the csname primitive but that's an implementation detail so begintabular accesses tabular but begintabular* accesses the command with name tabular* (not the two tokens that would normally be generated by parsing tabular*).



      So technically it would be quite hard to not allow digits (or other characters) in environment names, especially when latex was designed there was not the memory available to add that kind of character-by-character check.






      share|improve this answer



























        8












        8








        8







        The restriction is in the scanner, tex's "eyes" in the texbook terminology. Any sequence of characters may be used as a command name, however after a character of catcode 0 (normally ) then tex scans the next non-letter (character of catcode other than 11) or a contiguous sequence of letters, and tokenizes it as a single csname token.



        This means that foo123 normally parses as the token foo followed by the three tokens 1, 2, 3. Unless you make digits catcode 11. Similarly section* is normally the token section followed by the token *.



        environment names use do not require to parse the name via the escape character, (they use the csname primitive but that's an implementation detail so begintabular accesses tabular but begintabular* accesses the command with name tabular* (not the two tokens that would normally be generated by parsing tabular*).



        So technically it would be quite hard to not allow digits (or other characters) in environment names, especially when latex was designed there was not the memory available to add that kind of character-by-character check.






        share|improve this answer















        The restriction is in the scanner, tex's "eyes" in the texbook terminology. Any sequence of characters may be used as a command name, however after a character of catcode 0 (normally ) then tex scans the next non-letter (character of catcode other than 11) or a contiguous sequence of letters, and tokenizes it as a single csname token.



        This means that foo123 normally parses as the token foo followed by the three tokens 1, 2, 3. Unless you make digits catcode 11. Similarly section* is normally the token section followed by the token *.



        environment names use do not require to parse the name via the escape character, (they use the csname primitive but that's an implementation detail so begintabular accesses tabular but begintabular* accesses the command with name tabular* (not the two tokens that would normally be generated by parsing tabular*).



        So technically it would be quite hard to not allow digits (or other characters) in environment names, especially when latex was designed there was not the memory available to add that kind of character-by-character check.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Apr 5 at 23:24









        Phelype Oleinik

        24.9k54690




        24.9k54690










        answered Apr 5 at 23:19









        David CarlisleDavid Carlisle

        498k4111441893




        498k4111441893



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483440%2flatex-why-are-digits-allowed-in-environments-but-forbidden-in-commands%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Sum ergo cogito? 1 nng

            419 nièngy_Soadمي 19bal1.5o_g

            Queiggey Chernihivv 9NnOo i Zw X QqKk LpB