Intersection point of 2 lines defined by 2 points each The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InIntersection between two linesParallel Lines, One point on each.Intersection between 2 linesStraight lines - point of intersectionFinding the intersection point between two lines using a matrixCalculate intersection point between two linescollision point of circle and lineFind intersection point of two straight linesIntersection point of multiple 3D linesFour Dimensional intersection point

Manuscript was "unsubmitted" because the manuscript was deposited in Arxiv Preprints

Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?

Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?

Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"

Springs with some finite mass

In microwave frequencies, do you use a circulator when you need a (near) perfect diode?

Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed

Spanish for "widget"

Output the Arecibo Message

If a poisoned arrow's piercing damage is reduced to 0, do you still get poisoned?

JSON.serialize: is it possible to suppress null values of a map?

Idiomatic way to prevent slicing?

Could JWST stay at L2 "forever"?

What is a mixture ratio of propellant?

"To split hairs" vs "To be pedantic"

It's possible to achieve negative score?

Dual Citizen. Exited the US on Italian passport recently

What do the Banks children have against barley water?

Falsification in Math vs Science

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

Realistic Alternatives to Dust: What Else Could Feed a Plankton Bloom?

Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?

Pristine Bit Checking

How are circuits which use complex ICs normally simulated?



Intersection point of 2 lines defined by 2 points each



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InIntersection between two linesParallel Lines, One point on each.Intersection between 2 linesStraight lines - point of intersectionFinding the intersection point between two lines using a matrixCalculate intersection point between two linescollision point of circle and lineFind intersection point of two straight linesIntersection point of multiple 3D linesFour Dimensional intersection point










3












$begingroup$


I'm implementing this in code, but I'll rewrite it so that it is easier understood (like pseudocode):



# a = pt 1 on line 1
# b = pt 2 on line 1
# c = pt 1 on line 2
# d = pt 2 on line 2
def intersect(a,b,c,d):

# stuff for line 1
a1 = b.y-a.y
b1 = a.x-b.x
c1 = a1*a.x + b1*a.y

# stuff for line 2
a2 = d.y-c.y
b2 = c.x-d.x
c2 = a2*c.x + b2*c.y

determinant = a1*b2 - a2*b1

if (determinant == 0):
# Return (infinity, infinity) if they never intersect
# By "never intersect", I mean that the lines are parallel to each other
return math.inf, math,inf
else:
x = (b2*c1 - b1*c2)/determinant
y = (a1*c2 - a2*c1)/determinant
return x,y


All the above works, ... but only does by assuming that the lines extend infinitely in each direction, like a linear equation. I'll show what I mean here.



There are the 2 lines, red and green, and the gold dot is what is returned when I test this code ... but the lines don't actually intersect. What can be used to test whether the lines truly intersect?



Heres the actual Python code if needed.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    I'm implementing this in code, but I'll rewrite it so that it is easier understood (like pseudocode):



    # a = pt 1 on line 1
    # b = pt 2 on line 1
    # c = pt 1 on line 2
    # d = pt 2 on line 2
    def intersect(a,b,c,d):

    # stuff for line 1
    a1 = b.y-a.y
    b1 = a.x-b.x
    c1 = a1*a.x + b1*a.y

    # stuff for line 2
    a2 = d.y-c.y
    b2 = c.x-d.x
    c2 = a2*c.x + b2*c.y

    determinant = a1*b2 - a2*b1

    if (determinant == 0):
    # Return (infinity, infinity) if they never intersect
    # By "never intersect", I mean that the lines are parallel to each other
    return math.inf, math,inf
    else:
    x = (b2*c1 - b1*c2)/determinant
    y = (a1*c2 - a2*c1)/determinant
    return x,y


    All the above works, ... but only does by assuming that the lines extend infinitely in each direction, like a linear equation. I'll show what I mean here.



    There are the 2 lines, red and green, and the gold dot is what is returned when I test this code ... but the lines don't actually intersect. What can be used to test whether the lines truly intersect?



    Heres the actual Python code if needed.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      I'm implementing this in code, but I'll rewrite it so that it is easier understood (like pseudocode):



      # a = pt 1 on line 1
      # b = pt 2 on line 1
      # c = pt 1 on line 2
      # d = pt 2 on line 2
      def intersect(a,b,c,d):

      # stuff for line 1
      a1 = b.y-a.y
      b1 = a.x-b.x
      c1 = a1*a.x + b1*a.y

      # stuff for line 2
      a2 = d.y-c.y
      b2 = c.x-d.x
      c2 = a2*c.x + b2*c.y

      determinant = a1*b2 - a2*b1

      if (determinant == 0):
      # Return (infinity, infinity) if they never intersect
      # By "never intersect", I mean that the lines are parallel to each other
      return math.inf, math,inf
      else:
      x = (b2*c1 - b1*c2)/determinant
      y = (a1*c2 - a2*c1)/determinant
      return x,y


      All the above works, ... but only does by assuming that the lines extend infinitely in each direction, like a linear equation. I'll show what I mean here.



      There are the 2 lines, red and green, and the gold dot is what is returned when I test this code ... but the lines don't actually intersect. What can be used to test whether the lines truly intersect?



      Heres the actual Python code if needed.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I'm implementing this in code, but I'll rewrite it so that it is easier understood (like pseudocode):



      # a = pt 1 on line 1
      # b = pt 2 on line 1
      # c = pt 1 on line 2
      # d = pt 2 on line 2
      def intersect(a,b,c,d):

      # stuff for line 1
      a1 = b.y-a.y
      b1 = a.x-b.x
      c1 = a1*a.x + b1*a.y

      # stuff for line 2
      a2 = d.y-c.y
      b2 = c.x-d.x
      c2 = a2*c.x + b2*c.y

      determinant = a1*b2 - a2*b1

      if (determinant == 0):
      # Return (infinity, infinity) if they never intersect
      # By "never intersect", I mean that the lines are parallel to each other
      return math.inf, math,inf
      else:
      x = (b2*c1 - b1*c2)/determinant
      y = (a1*c2 - a2*c1)/determinant
      return x,y


      All the above works, ... but only does by assuming that the lines extend infinitely in each direction, like a linear equation. I'll show what I mean here.



      There are the 2 lines, red and green, and the gold dot is what is returned when I test this code ... but the lines don't actually intersect. What can be used to test whether the lines truly intersect?



      Heres the actual Python code if needed.







      linear-algebra matrices python






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Apr 6 at 1:29









      Ethan Bolker

      45.9k553120




      45.9k553120










      asked Apr 6 at 0:13









      crazicrafter1crazicrafter1

      247




      247




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          I think you are asking for the intersection point (if any) of two line segments, not two lines.



          Once you find the intersection point $P$ as you have, you can check that it is between the endpoints $A$ and $B$ of a segment by solving the equation
          $$
          tA + (1-t)B = P
          $$

          for $t$ and checking that $t$ is between $0$ and $1$. That equation will have a solution because you know $P$ is on the line. Do that for each of the two segments.



          Warning: you may have numerical instability if the determinant is close to $0$. That will happen when the lines are nearly parallel.



          (There may be a shorter way to do this from scratch, but this will work.)






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




















            3












            $begingroup$

            You have the point $x$ where the infinite lines intersect. You need to check whether that point is on both finite line segments.



            Line segment 1 has endpoints $a$ and $b$. Use these to make a vector $vecab=b-a$. If the dot product $vecabcdotvecax$ is positive, then $x$ is forward of $a$; if it's negative, then $x$ is behind $a$. Likewise, if $vecabcdotvecbx$ is positive, then $x$ is forward of $b$. The point $x$ is on the segment if it's between $a$ and $b$.



            Do the same test for the other line segment.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$




















              2












              $begingroup$

              This is an elaboration on Ethan Bolker's post.



              Every point on the line segment from $a$ to $b$ can be expressed as $$a + t(b-a)$$ for some $t$ between $0$ and $1$. Likewise, every point on the line segment from $c$ to $d$ can be expressed as $$c + s(d-c)$$ for some $s$ between $0$ and $1$. Any intersection point can be expressed in both forms, so we will have



              $$a + t(b-a) = c + s(d - c)$$
              re-arranging,
              $$t(b - a) + s(c - d) = c - a$$



              Letting $n = b - a, m = c-d$, and $p = c - a$, and switching to coordinates, we have
              $$n_xt + m_xs = p_x\n_yt + m_ys = p_y$$



              Instead of solving directly for the coordinates of the point of intersection, you should solve for $t$ and $s$. Letting
              $$D = n_xm_y - n_ym_x\Q_x = m_yp_x - m_xp_y\Q_y =n_xp_y - n_yp_x$$



              We have $$t=frac Q_xD, quad s = frac Q_yD$$



              In particular, we can figure out the following before doing the divisions:



              • If $D$ is $0$, then the segments are parallel - the only way they can intersect in a unique point is if the two segments are adjacent and have a common endpoint (for instance $b = c$, and $a$ and $d$ are on opposite sides of the common point).

              • If $D$ is the opposite sign of either $Q_x$ or $Q_y$, then one of $t$ or $s < 0$, so the line segments do not intersect.

              • If $|D|$ is smaller than $|Q_x|$ or smaller than $|Q_y|$, then one of $t$ or $s > 1$, and again the line segments do not intersect.

              • Otherwise, the segments do intersect, and you either calculate $t$ and $a + t(b -a)$ or calculate $s$ and $c + s(d - c)$ to get the point of intersection.

              This is a more numerically stable approach to the problem.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                @crazicrafter1 This is a much better algorithm than mine built on yours and you should implement it.
                $endgroup$
                – Ethan Bolker
                Apr 6 at 10:48











              • $begingroup$
                @EthanBolker - the problem is one I already had personal experience with.
                $endgroup$
                – Paul Sinclair
                Apr 6 at 16:10











              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3176543%2fintersection-point-of-2-lines-defined-by-2-points-each%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              5












              $begingroup$

              I think you are asking for the intersection point (if any) of two line segments, not two lines.



              Once you find the intersection point $P$ as you have, you can check that it is between the endpoints $A$ and $B$ of a segment by solving the equation
              $$
              tA + (1-t)B = P
              $$

              for $t$ and checking that $t$ is between $0$ and $1$. That equation will have a solution because you know $P$ is on the line. Do that for each of the two segments.



              Warning: you may have numerical instability if the determinant is close to $0$. That will happen when the lines are nearly parallel.



              (There may be a shorter way to do this from scratch, but this will work.)






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                5












                $begingroup$

                I think you are asking for the intersection point (if any) of two line segments, not two lines.



                Once you find the intersection point $P$ as you have, you can check that it is between the endpoints $A$ and $B$ of a segment by solving the equation
                $$
                tA + (1-t)B = P
                $$

                for $t$ and checking that $t$ is between $0$ and $1$. That equation will have a solution because you know $P$ is on the line. Do that for each of the two segments.



                Warning: you may have numerical instability if the determinant is close to $0$. That will happen when the lines are nearly parallel.



                (There may be a shorter way to do this from scratch, but this will work.)






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  5












                  5








                  5





                  $begingroup$

                  I think you are asking for the intersection point (if any) of two line segments, not two lines.



                  Once you find the intersection point $P$ as you have, you can check that it is between the endpoints $A$ and $B$ of a segment by solving the equation
                  $$
                  tA + (1-t)B = P
                  $$

                  for $t$ and checking that $t$ is between $0$ and $1$. That equation will have a solution because you know $P$ is on the line. Do that for each of the two segments.



                  Warning: you may have numerical instability if the determinant is close to $0$. That will happen when the lines are nearly parallel.



                  (There may be a shorter way to do this from scratch, but this will work.)






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  I think you are asking for the intersection point (if any) of two line segments, not two lines.



                  Once you find the intersection point $P$ as you have, you can check that it is between the endpoints $A$ and $B$ of a segment by solving the equation
                  $$
                  tA + (1-t)B = P
                  $$

                  for $t$ and checking that $t$ is between $0$ and $1$. That equation will have a solution because you know $P$ is on the line. Do that for each of the two segments.



                  Warning: you may have numerical instability if the determinant is close to $0$. That will happen when the lines are nearly parallel.



                  (There may be a shorter way to do this from scratch, but this will work.)







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Apr 6 at 1:46

























                  answered Apr 6 at 1:34









                  Ethan BolkerEthan Bolker

                  45.9k553120




                  45.9k553120





















                      3












                      $begingroup$

                      You have the point $x$ where the infinite lines intersect. You need to check whether that point is on both finite line segments.



                      Line segment 1 has endpoints $a$ and $b$. Use these to make a vector $vecab=b-a$. If the dot product $vecabcdotvecax$ is positive, then $x$ is forward of $a$; if it's negative, then $x$ is behind $a$. Likewise, if $vecabcdotvecbx$ is positive, then $x$ is forward of $b$. The point $x$ is on the segment if it's between $a$ and $b$.



                      Do the same test for the other line segment.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        3












                        $begingroup$

                        You have the point $x$ where the infinite lines intersect. You need to check whether that point is on both finite line segments.



                        Line segment 1 has endpoints $a$ and $b$. Use these to make a vector $vecab=b-a$. If the dot product $vecabcdotvecax$ is positive, then $x$ is forward of $a$; if it's negative, then $x$ is behind $a$. Likewise, if $vecabcdotvecbx$ is positive, then $x$ is forward of $b$. The point $x$ is on the segment if it's between $a$ and $b$.



                        Do the same test for the other line segment.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          3












                          3








                          3





                          $begingroup$

                          You have the point $x$ where the infinite lines intersect. You need to check whether that point is on both finite line segments.



                          Line segment 1 has endpoints $a$ and $b$. Use these to make a vector $vecab=b-a$. If the dot product $vecabcdotvecax$ is positive, then $x$ is forward of $a$; if it's negative, then $x$ is behind $a$. Likewise, if $vecabcdotvecbx$ is positive, then $x$ is forward of $b$. The point $x$ is on the segment if it's between $a$ and $b$.



                          Do the same test for the other line segment.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          You have the point $x$ where the infinite lines intersect. You need to check whether that point is on both finite line segments.



                          Line segment 1 has endpoints $a$ and $b$. Use these to make a vector $vecab=b-a$. If the dot product $vecabcdotvecax$ is positive, then $x$ is forward of $a$; if it's negative, then $x$ is behind $a$. Likewise, if $vecabcdotvecbx$ is positive, then $x$ is forward of $b$. The point $x$ is on the segment if it's between $a$ and $b$.



                          Do the same test for the other line segment.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Apr 6 at 1:42









                          mr_e_manmr_e_man

                          1,2001424




                          1,2001424





















                              2












                              $begingroup$

                              This is an elaboration on Ethan Bolker's post.



                              Every point on the line segment from $a$ to $b$ can be expressed as $$a + t(b-a)$$ for some $t$ between $0$ and $1$. Likewise, every point on the line segment from $c$ to $d$ can be expressed as $$c + s(d-c)$$ for some $s$ between $0$ and $1$. Any intersection point can be expressed in both forms, so we will have



                              $$a + t(b-a) = c + s(d - c)$$
                              re-arranging,
                              $$t(b - a) + s(c - d) = c - a$$



                              Letting $n = b - a, m = c-d$, and $p = c - a$, and switching to coordinates, we have
                              $$n_xt + m_xs = p_x\n_yt + m_ys = p_y$$



                              Instead of solving directly for the coordinates of the point of intersection, you should solve for $t$ and $s$. Letting
                              $$D = n_xm_y - n_ym_x\Q_x = m_yp_x - m_xp_y\Q_y =n_xp_y - n_yp_x$$



                              We have $$t=frac Q_xD, quad s = frac Q_yD$$



                              In particular, we can figure out the following before doing the divisions:



                              • If $D$ is $0$, then the segments are parallel - the only way they can intersect in a unique point is if the two segments are adjacent and have a common endpoint (for instance $b = c$, and $a$ and $d$ are on opposite sides of the common point).

                              • If $D$ is the opposite sign of either $Q_x$ or $Q_y$, then one of $t$ or $s < 0$, so the line segments do not intersect.

                              • If $|D|$ is smaller than $|Q_x|$ or smaller than $|Q_y|$, then one of $t$ or $s > 1$, and again the line segments do not intersect.

                              • Otherwise, the segments do intersect, and you either calculate $t$ and $a + t(b -a)$ or calculate $s$ and $c + s(d - c)$ to get the point of intersection.

                              This is a more numerically stable approach to the problem.






                              share|cite|improve this answer











                              $endgroup$












                              • $begingroup$
                                @crazicrafter1 This is a much better algorithm than mine built on yours and you should implement it.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Ethan Bolker
                                Apr 6 at 10:48











                              • $begingroup$
                                @EthanBolker - the problem is one I already had personal experience with.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Paul Sinclair
                                Apr 6 at 16:10















                              2












                              $begingroup$

                              This is an elaboration on Ethan Bolker's post.



                              Every point on the line segment from $a$ to $b$ can be expressed as $$a + t(b-a)$$ for some $t$ between $0$ and $1$. Likewise, every point on the line segment from $c$ to $d$ can be expressed as $$c + s(d-c)$$ for some $s$ between $0$ and $1$. Any intersection point can be expressed in both forms, so we will have



                              $$a + t(b-a) = c + s(d - c)$$
                              re-arranging,
                              $$t(b - a) + s(c - d) = c - a$$



                              Letting $n = b - a, m = c-d$, and $p = c - a$, and switching to coordinates, we have
                              $$n_xt + m_xs = p_x\n_yt + m_ys = p_y$$



                              Instead of solving directly for the coordinates of the point of intersection, you should solve for $t$ and $s$. Letting
                              $$D = n_xm_y - n_ym_x\Q_x = m_yp_x - m_xp_y\Q_y =n_xp_y - n_yp_x$$



                              We have $$t=frac Q_xD, quad s = frac Q_yD$$



                              In particular, we can figure out the following before doing the divisions:



                              • If $D$ is $0$, then the segments are parallel - the only way they can intersect in a unique point is if the two segments are adjacent and have a common endpoint (for instance $b = c$, and $a$ and $d$ are on opposite sides of the common point).

                              • If $D$ is the opposite sign of either $Q_x$ or $Q_y$, then one of $t$ or $s < 0$, so the line segments do not intersect.

                              • If $|D|$ is smaller than $|Q_x|$ or smaller than $|Q_y|$, then one of $t$ or $s > 1$, and again the line segments do not intersect.

                              • Otherwise, the segments do intersect, and you either calculate $t$ and $a + t(b -a)$ or calculate $s$ and $c + s(d - c)$ to get the point of intersection.

                              This is a more numerically stable approach to the problem.






                              share|cite|improve this answer











                              $endgroup$












                              • $begingroup$
                                @crazicrafter1 This is a much better algorithm than mine built on yours and you should implement it.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Ethan Bolker
                                Apr 6 at 10:48











                              • $begingroup$
                                @EthanBolker - the problem is one I already had personal experience with.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Paul Sinclair
                                Apr 6 at 16:10













                              2












                              2








                              2





                              $begingroup$

                              This is an elaboration on Ethan Bolker's post.



                              Every point on the line segment from $a$ to $b$ can be expressed as $$a + t(b-a)$$ for some $t$ between $0$ and $1$. Likewise, every point on the line segment from $c$ to $d$ can be expressed as $$c + s(d-c)$$ for some $s$ between $0$ and $1$. Any intersection point can be expressed in both forms, so we will have



                              $$a + t(b-a) = c + s(d - c)$$
                              re-arranging,
                              $$t(b - a) + s(c - d) = c - a$$



                              Letting $n = b - a, m = c-d$, and $p = c - a$, and switching to coordinates, we have
                              $$n_xt + m_xs = p_x\n_yt + m_ys = p_y$$



                              Instead of solving directly for the coordinates of the point of intersection, you should solve for $t$ and $s$. Letting
                              $$D = n_xm_y - n_ym_x\Q_x = m_yp_x - m_xp_y\Q_y =n_xp_y - n_yp_x$$



                              We have $$t=frac Q_xD, quad s = frac Q_yD$$



                              In particular, we can figure out the following before doing the divisions:



                              • If $D$ is $0$, then the segments are parallel - the only way they can intersect in a unique point is if the two segments are adjacent and have a common endpoint (for instance $b = c$, and $a$ and $d$ are on opposite sides of the common point).

                              • If $D$ is the opposite sign of either $Q_x$ or $Q_y$, then one of $t$ or $s < 0$, so the line segments do not intersect.

                              • If $|D|$ is smaller than $|Q_x|$ or smaller than $|Q_y|$, then one of $t$ or $s > 1$, and again the line segments do not intersect.

                              • Otherwise, the segments do intersect, and you either calculate $t$ and $a + t(b -a)$ or calculate $s$ and $c + s(d - c)$ to get the point of intersection.

                              This is a more numerically stable approach to the problem.






                              share|cite|improve this answer











                              $endgroup$



                              This is an elaboration on Ethan Bolker's post.



                              Every point on the line segment from $a$ to $b$ can be expressed as $$a + t(b-a)$$ for some $t$ between $0$ and $1$. Likewise, every point on the line segment from $c$ to $d$ can be expressed as $$c + s(d-c)$$ for some $s$ between $0$ and $1$. Any intersection point can be expressed in both forms, so we will have



                              $$a + t(b-a) = c + s(d - c)$$
                              re-arranging,
                              $$t(b - a) + s(c - d) = c - a$$



                              Letting $n = b - a, m = c-d$, and $p = c - a$, and switching to coordinates, we have
                              $$n_xt + m_xs = p_x\n_yt + m_ys = p_y$$



                              Instead of solving directly for the coordinates of the point of intersection, you should solve for $t$ and $s$. Letting
                              $$D = n_xm_y - n_ym_x\Q_x = m_yp_x - m_xp_y\Q_y =n_xp_y - n_yp_x$$



                              We have $$t=frac Q_xD, quad s = frac Q_yD$$



                              In particular, we can figure out the following before doing the divisions:



                              • If $D$ is $0$, then the segments are parallel - the only way they can intersect in a unique point is if the two segments are adjacent and have a common endpoint (for instance $b = c$, and $a$ and $d$ are on opposite sides of the common point).

                              • If $D$ is the opposite sign of either $Q_x$ or $Q_y$, then one of $t$ or $s < 0$, so the line segments do not intersect.

                              • If $|D|$ is smaller than $|Q_x|$ or smaller than $|Q_y|$, then one of $t$ or $s > 1$, and again the line segments do not intersect.

                              • Otherwise, the segments do intersect, and you either calculate $t$ and $a + t(b -a)$ or calculate $s$ and $c + s(d - c)$ to get the point of intersection.

                              This is a more numerically stable approach to the problem.







                              share|cite|improve this answer














                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer








                              edited 6 hours ago

























                              answered Apr 6 at 4:00









                              Paul SinclairPaul Sinclair

                              20.8k21543




                              20.8k21543











                              • $begingroup$
                                @crazicrafter1 This is a much better algorithm than mine built on yours and you should implement it.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Ethan Bolker
                                Apr 6 at 10:48











                              • $begingroup$
                                @EthanBolker - the problem is one I already had personal experience with.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Paul Sinclair
                                Apr 6 at 16:10
















                              • $begingroup$
                                @crazicrafter1 This is a much better algorithm than mine built on yours and you should implement it.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Ethan Bolker
                                Apr 6 at 10:48











                              • $begingroup$
                                @EthanBolker - the problem is one I already had personal experience with.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Paul Sinclair
                                Apr 6 at 16:10















                              $begingroup$
                              @crazicrafter1 This is a much better algorithm than mine built on yours and you should implement it.
                              $endgroup$
                              – Ethan Bolker
                              Apr 6 at 10:48





                              $begingroup$
                              @crazicrafter1 This is a much better algorithm than mine built on yours and you should implement it.
                              $endgroup$
                              – Ethan Bolker
                              Apr 6 at 10:48













                              $begingroup$
                              @EthanBolker - the problem is one I already had personal experience with.
                              $endgroup$
                              – Paul Sinclair
                              Apr 6 at 16:10




                              $begingroup$
                              @EthanBolker - the problem is one I already had personal experience with.
                              $endgroup$
                              – Paul Sinclair
                              Apr 6 at 16:10

















                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3176543%2fintersection-point-of-2-lines-defined-by-2-points-each%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Sum ergo cogito? 1 nng

                              419 nièngy_Soadمي 19bal1.5o_g

                              Queiggey Chernihivv 9NnOo i Zw X QqKk LpB