How do I draw and define two right triangles next to each other? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow to put two images next to each other with a) and b) labels?2 SCfigure next to each otherPlacing two figures (each having subfigures) next two each otherTable caption not appearing in PNAS document classFigures on two pages next to each otherFigures next to each otherHow to place two figures next to each other and centeredHow to put two images on top of each other and a table next to them?Inserting two figures below each othertwo subfigures next to each other aligned on top

Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"

Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?

Is domain driven design an anti-SQL pattern?

Can distinct morphisms between curves induce the same morphism on singular cohomology?

Patience, young "Padovan"

Why is my p-value correlated to difference between means in two sample tests?

The difference between dialogue marks

How to create dashed lines/arrows in Illustrator

Can't find the latex code for the ⍎ (down tack jot) symbol

"To split hairs" vs "To be pedantic"

I see my dog run

How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect

Is it possible for the two major parties in the UK to form a coalition with each other instead of a much smaller party?

What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?

It's possible to achieve negative score?

Why is Grand Jury testimony secret?

Does light intensity oscillate really fast since it is a wave?

What is the best strategy for white in this position?

Where to refill my bottle in India?

Why could you hear an Amstrad CPC working?

Are USB sockets on wall outlets live all the time, even when the switch is off?

What are the motivations for publishing new editions of an existing textbook, beyond new discoveries in a field?

Falsification in Math vs Science

Idiomatic way to prevent slicing?



How do I draw and define two right triangles next to each other?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow to put two images next to each other with a) and b) labels?2 SCfigure next to each otherPlacing two figures (each having subfigures) next two each otherTable caption not appearing in PNAS document classFigures on two pages next to each otherFigures next to each otherHow to place two figures next to each other and centeredHow to put two images on top of each other and a table next to them?Inserting two figures below each othertwo subfigures next to each other aligned on top










5















My goal is to draw a figure exactly like this enter image description here
The best I could do coding this was:



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath,amsfonts,amssymb
usepackagetikz
usepackagefloat

begindocument

begintikzpicture

draw (1, 0) to (1, 4);
draw (1, 0) to (4, 0);
draw (1, 4) to (4, 0);

endtikzpicture

begintikzpicture

draw (1, 0) to (1, 3);
draw (1, 0) to (3, 0);
draw (1, 3) to (3, 0);

endtikzpicture

enddocument


Which ends up looking like this. I tried putting in the values and angle points but it ended up looking much worse, so I omitted them:
enter image description here



So how do I get my figure to look exactly like the first figure? If it means anything, I'm using a MacBook Pro and I'm using the TexShop application.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Lex_i is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Welcome to TeX.SE!

    – Kurt
    Apr 6 at 0:18















5















My goal is to draw a figure exactly like this enter image description here
The best I could do coding this was:



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath,amsfonts,amssymb
usepackagetikz
usepackagefloat

begindocument

begintikzpicture

draw (1, 0) to (1, 4);
draw (1, 0) to (4, 0);
draw (1, 4) to (4, 0);

endtikzpicture

begintikzpicture

draw (1, 0) to (1, 3);
draw (1, 0) to (3, 0);
draw (1, 3) to (3, 0);

endtikzpicture

enddocument


Which ends up looking like this. I tried putting in the values and angle points but it ended up looking much worse, so I omitted them:
enter image description here



So how do I get my figure to look exactly like the first figure? If it means anything, I'm using a MacBook Pro and I'm using the TexShop application.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Lex_i is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Welcome to TeX.SE!

    – Kurt
    Apr 6 at 0:18













5












5








5








My goal is to draw a figure exactly like this enter image description here
The best I could do coding this was:



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath,amsfonts,amssymb
usepackagetikz
usepackagefloat

begindocument

begintikzpicture

draw (1, 0) to (1, 4);
draw (1, 0) to (4, 0);
draw (1, 4) to (4, 0);

endtikzpicture

begintikzpicture

draw (1, 0) to (1, 3);
draw (1, 0) to (3, 0);
draw (1, 3) to (3, 0);

endtikzpicture

enddocument


Which ends up looking like this. I tried putting in the values and angle points but it ended up looking much worse, so I omitted them:
enter image description here



So how do I get my figure to look exactly like the first figure? If it means anything, I'm using a MacBook Pro and I'm using the TexShop application.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Lex_i is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












My goal is to draw a figure exactly like this enter image description here
The best I could do coding this was:



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath,amsfonts,amssymb
usepackagetikz
usepackagefloat

begindocument

begintikzpicture

draw (1, 0) to (1, 4);
draw (1, 0) to (4, 0);
draw (1, 4) to (4, 0);

endtikzpicture

begintikzpicture

draw (1, 0) to (1, 3);
draw (1, 0) to (3, 0);
draw (1, 3) to (3, 0);

endtikzpicture

enddocument


Which ends up looking like this. I tried putting in the values and angle points but it ended up looking much worse, so I omitted them:
enter image description here



So how do I get my figure to look exactly like the first figure? If it means anything, I'm using a MacBook Pro and I'm using the TexShop application.







floats geometry shapes tikz-shape






share|improve this question







New contributor




Lex_i is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Lex_i is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Lex_i is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Apr 6 at 0:06









Lex_iLex_i

282




282




New contributor




Lex_i is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Lex_i is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Lex_i is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Welcome to TeX.SE!

    – Kurt
    Apr 6 at 0:18

















  • Welcome to TeX.SE!

    – Kurt
    Apr 6 at 0:18
















Welcome to TeX.SE!

– Kurt
Apr 6 at 0:18





Welcome to TeX.SE!

– Kurt
Apr 6 at 0:18










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5














Welcome to TeX-SE! The issue you are seeing is caused by the fact that an empty line tells TeX to start a new paragraph. So all you need to do is to remove the empty line. Here I go a slightly different route and put the second triangle in a scope that is used to move it to the right. This allows you to more easily control the distance between the triangles, and their vertical relative alignment. Please note also that it is advantageous to draw them in one stretch and close them with -- cycle because then the line joins look better.



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath,amsfonts,amssymb
usepackagetikz
usepackagefloat

begindocument

begintikzpicture
draw (1, 0) node[below left]$A$ -- node[midway,left]$x+29$
(1, 4) node[above left] $B$
-- (4, 0) node[below right]$C$ -- node[midway,below]$21$
cycle;
beginscope[xshift=5cm,yshift=0.5cm]
draw (1, 0) node[below left]$D$
-- node[midway,left]$12$ (1, 3)
node[above left]$E$
-- (3, 0) node[below right]$F$ -- node[midway,below]$x$
(1,0)-- cycle ;
endscope
endtikzpicture

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer

























  • Thank you! That did just the job. I'll definitely keep the scope and shift and cycle stuff in my arsenal. I'm new to LaTeX, so I'm just getting the hang of it at the moment.

    – Lex_i
    Apr 6 at 0:22











  • @Lex_i You're welcome! (Please note also that the absolute coordinates do not have a real meaning, i.e. instead of draw (1, 0) node[below left]$A$ -- node[midway,left]$x+29$ (1, 4) node[above left] $B$ -- (4, 0) node[below right]$C$ -- node[midway,below]$21$ cycle; you could also use draw (0, 0) node[below left]$A$ -- node[midway,left]$x+29$ (0, 4) node[above left] $B$ -- (3, 0) node[below right]$C$ -- node[midway,below]$21$ cycle;.

    – marmot
    Apr 6 at 0:24











  • Even if the problem of the question is trivial, the question is very well formulated, with a complete MWE. Even if the answer is simple, I think it could be useful. Not much is needed to trasform a banality in a future easily searchable help. These are not the things I was referring to in Meta.

    – CarLaTeX
    Apr 6 at 5:07


















3














an alternative, using relative coordinates tikz libraryquotes for labeling lines in triangles:



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath,amssymb % amsfonts is loaded by amsymb
usepackagetikz
usetikzlibraryquotes

begindocument

begintikzpicture
draw (0, 0) node[below] A to["$x+29$"] ++ (0, 4) node[above] B
to ++ (3,-4) node[below] C
to["$21$"] cycle;
draw (5,.5) node[below] D to["$12$"] ++ (0, 3) node[above] E
to ++ (2,-3) node[below] F
to["$x$"] cycle;
endtikzpicture

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Lex_i is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483446%2fhow-do-i-draw-and-define-two-right-triangles-next-to-each-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    Welcome to TeX-SE! The issue you are seeing is caused by the fact that an empty line tells TeX to start a new paragraph. So all you need to do is to remove the empty line. Here I go a slightly different route and put the second triangle in a scope that is used to move it to the right. This allows you to more easily control the distance between the triangles, and their vertical relative alignment. Please note also that it is advantageous to draw them in one stretch and close them with -- cycle because then the line joins look better.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath,amsfonts,amssymb
    usepackagetikz
    usepackagefloat

    begindocument

    begintikzpicture
    draw (1, 0) node[below left]$A$ -- node[midway,left]$x+29$
    (1, 4) node[above left] $B$
    -- (4, 0) node[below right]$C$ -- node[midway,below]$21$
    cycle;
    beginscope[xshift=5cm,yshift=0.5cm]
    draw (1, 0) node[below left]$D$
    -- node[midway,left]$12$ (1, 3)
    node[above left]$E$
    -- (3, 0) node[below right]$F$ -- node[midway,below]$x$
    (1,0)-- cycle ;
    endscope
    endtikzpicture

    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer

























    • Thank you! That did just the job. I'll definitely keep the scope and shift and cycle stuff in my arsenal. I'm new to LaTeX, so I'm just getting the hang of it at the moment.

      – Lex_i
      Apr 6 at 0:22











    • @Lex_i You're welcome! (Please note also that the absolute coordinates do not have a real meaning, i.e. instead of draw (1, 0) node[below left]$A$ -- node[midway,left]$x+29$ (1, 4) node[above left] $B$ -- (4, 0) node[below right]$C$ -- node[midway,below]$21$ cycle; you could also use draw (0, 0) node[below left]$A$ -- node[midway,left]$x+29$ (0, 4) node[above left] $B$ -- (3, 0) node[below right]$C$ -- node[midway,below]$21$ cycle;.

      – marmot
      Apr 6 at 0:24











    • Even if the problem of the question is trivial, the question is very well formulated, with a complete MWE. Even if the answer is simple, I think it could be useful. Not much is needed to trasform a banality in a future easily searchable help. These are not the things I was referring to in Meta.

      – CarLaTeX
      Apr 6 at 5:07















    5














    Welcome to TeX-SE! The issue you are seeing is caused by the fact that an empty line tells TeX to start a new paragraph. So all you need to do is to remove the empty line. Here I go a slightly different route and put the second triangle in a scope that is used to move it to the right. This allows you to more easily control the distance between the triangles, and their vertical relative alignment. Please note also that it is advantageous to draw them in one stretch and close them with -- cycle because then the line joins look better.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath,amsfonts,amssymb
    usepackagetikz
    usepackagefloat

    begindocument

    begintikzpicture
    draw (1, 0) node[below left]$A$ -- node[midway,left]$x+29$
    (1, 4) node[above left] $B$
    -- (4, 0) node[below right]$C$ -- node[midway,below]$21$
    cycle;
    beginscope[xshift=5cm,yshift=0.5cm]
    draw (1, 0) node[below left]$D$
    -- node[midway,left]$12$ (1, 3)
    node[above left]$E$
    -- (3, 0) node[below right]$F$ -- node[midway,below]$x$
    (1,0)-- cycle ;
    endscope
    endtikzpicture

    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer

























    • Thank you! That did just the job. I'll definitely keep the scope and shift and cycle stuff in my arsenal. I'm new to LaTeX, so I'm just getting the hang of it at the moment.

      – Lex_i
      Apr 6 at 0:22











    • @Lex_i You're welcome! (Please note also that the absolute coordinates do not have a real meaning, i.e. instead of draw (1, 0) node[below left]$A$ -- node[midway,left]$x+29$ (1, 4) node[above left] $B$ -- (4, 0) node[below right]$C$ -- node[midway,below]$21$ cycle; you could also use draw (0, 0) node[below left]$A$ -- node[midway,left]$x+29$ (0, 4) node[above left] $B$ -- (3, 0) node[below right]$C$ -- node[midway,below]$21$ cycle;.

      – marmot
      Apr 6 at 0:24











    • Even if the problem of the question is trivial, the question is very well formulated, with a complete MWE. Even if the answer is simple, I think it could be useful. Not much is needed to trasform a banality in a future easily searchable help. These are not the things I was referring to in Meta.

      – CarLaTeX
      Apr 6 at 5:07













    5












    5








    5







    Welcome to TeX-SE! The issue you are seeing is caused by the fact that an empty line tells TeX to start a new paragraph. So all you need to do is to remove the empty line. Here I go a slightly different route and put the second triangle in a scope that is used to move it to the right. This allows you to more easily control the distance between the triangles, and their vertical relative alignment. Please note also that it is advantageous to draw them in one stretch and close them with -- cycle because then the line joins look better.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath,amsfonts,amssymb
    usepackagetikz
    usepackagefloat

    begindocument

    begintikzpicture
    draw (1, 0) node[below left]$A$ -- node[midway,left]$x+29$
    (1, 4) node[above left] $B$
    -- (4, 0) node[below right]$C$ -- node[midway,below]$21$
    cycle;
    beginscope[xshift=5cm,yshift=0.5cm]
    draw (1, 0) node[below left]$D$
    -- node[midway,left]$12$ (1, 3)
    node[above left]$E$
    -- (3, 0) node[below right]$F$ -- node[midway,below]$x$
    (1,0)-- cycle ;
    endscope
    endtikzpicture

    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer















    Welcome to TeX-SE! The issue you are seeing is caused by the fact that an empty line tells TeX to start a new paragraph. So all you need to do is to remove the empty line. Here I go a slightly different route and put the second triangle in a scope that is used to move it to the right. This allows you to more easily control the distance between the triangles, and their vertical relative alignment. Please note also that it is advantageous to draw them in one stretch and close them with -- cycle because then the line joins look better.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath,amsfonts,amssymb
    usepackagetikz
    usepackagefloat

    begindocument

    begintikzpicture
    draw (1, 0) node[below left]$A$ -- node[midway,left]$x+29$
    (1, 4) node[above left] $B$
    -- (4, 0) node[below right]$C$ -- node[midway,below]$21$
    cycle;
    beginscope[xshift=5cm,yshift=0.5cm]
    draw (1, 0) node[below left]$D$
    -- node[midway,left]$12$ (1, 3)
    node[above left]$E$
    -- (3, 0) node[below right]$F$ -- node[midway,below]$x$
    (1,0)-- cycle ;
    endscope
    endtikzpicture

    enddocument


    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Apr 6 at 0:21

























    answered Apr 6 at 0:10









    marmotmarmot

    116k5149280




    116k5149280












    • Thank you! That did just the job. I'll definitely keep the scope and shift and cycle stuff in my arsenal. I'm new to LaTeX, so I'm just getting the hang of it at the moment.

      – Lex_i
      Apr 6 at 0:22











    • @Lex_i You're welcome! (Please note also that the absolute coordinates do not have a real meaning, i.e. instead of draw (1, 0) node[below left]$A$ -- node[midway,left]$x+29$ (1, 4) node[above left] $B$ -- (4, 0) node[below right]$C$ -- node[midway,below]$21$ cycle; you could also use draw (0, 0) node[below left]$A$ -- node[midway,left]$x+29$ (0, 4) node[above left] $B$ -- (3, 0) node[below right]$C$ -- node[midway,below]$21$ cycle;.

      – marmot
      Apr 6 at 0:24











    • Even if the problem of the question is trivial, the question is very well formulated, with a complete MWE. Even if the answer is simple, I think it could be useful. Not much is needed to trasform a banality in a future easily searchable help. These are not the things I was referring to in Meta.

      – CarLaTeX
      Apr 6 at 5:07

















    • Thank you! That did just the job. I'll definitely keep the scope and shift and cycle stuff in my arsenal. I'm new to LaTeX, so I'm just getting the hang of it at the moment.

      – Lex_i
      Apr 6 at 0:22











    • @Lex_i You're welcome! (Please note also that the absolute coordinates do not have a real meaning, i.e. instead of draw (1, 0) node[below left]$A$ -- node[midway,left]$x+29$ (1, 4) node[above left] $B$ -- (4, 0) node[below right]$C$ -- node[midway,below]$21$ cycle; you could also use draw (0, 0) node[below left]$A$ -- node[midway,left]$x+29$ (0, 4) node[above left] $B$ -- (3, 0) node[below right]$C$ -- node[midway,below]$21$ cycle;.

      – marmot
      Apr 6 at 0:24











    • Even if the problem of the question is trivial, the question is very well formulated, with a complete MWE. Even if the answer is simple, I think it could be useful. Not much is needed to trasform a banality in a future easily searchable help. These are not the things I was referring to in Meta.

      – CarLaTeX
      Apr 6 at 5:07
















    Thank you! That did just the job. I'll definitely keep the scope and shift and cycle stuff in my arsenal. I'm new to LaTeX, so I'm just getting the hang of it at the moment.

    – Lex_i
    Apr 6 at 0:22





    Thank you! That did just the job. I'll definitely keep the scope and shift and cycle stuff in my arsenal. I'm new to LaTeX, so I'm just getting the hang of it at the moment.

    – Lex_i
    Apr 6 at 0:22













    @Lex_i You're welcome! (Please note also that the absolute coordinates do not have a real meaning, i.e. instead of draw (1, 0) node[below left]$A$ -- node[midway,left]$x+29$ (1, 4) node[above left] $B$ -- (4, 0) node[below right]$C$ -- node[midway,below]$21$ cycle; you could also use draw (0, 0) node[below left]$A$ -- node[midway,left]$x+29$ (0, 4) node[above left] $B$ -- (3, 0) node[below right]$C$ -- node[midway,below]$21$ cycle;.

    – marmot
    Apr 6 at 0:24





    @Lex_i You're welcome! (Please note also that the absolute coordinates do not have a real meaning, i.e. instead of draw (1, 0) node[below left]$A$ -- node[midway,left]$x+29$ (1, 4) node[above left] $B$ -- (4, 0) node[below right]$C$ -- node[midway,below]$21$ cycle; you could also use draw (0, 0) node[below left]$A$ -- node[midway,left]$x+29$ (0, 4) node[above left] $B$ -- (3, 0) node[below right]$C$ -- node[midway,below]$21$ cycle;.

    – marmot
    Apr 6 at 0:24













    Even if the problem of the question is trivial, the question is very well formulated, with a complete MWE. Even if the answer is simple, I think it could be useful. Not much is needed to trasform a banality in a future easily searchable help. These are not the things I was referring to in Meta.

    – CarLaTeX
    Apr 6 at 5:07





    Even if the problem of the question is trivial, the question is very well formulated, with a complete MWE. Even if the answer is simple, I think it could be useful. Not much is needed to trasform a banality in a future easily searchable help. These are not the things I was referring to in Meta.

    – CarLaTeX
    Apr 6 at 5:07











    3














    an alternative, using relative coordinates tikz libraryquotes for labeling lines in triangles:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath,amssymb % amsfonts is loaded by amsymb
    usepackagetikz
    usetikzlibraryquotes

    begindocument

    begintikzpicture
    draw (0, 0) node[below] A to["$x+29$"] ++ (0, 4) node[above] B
    to ++ (3,-4) node[below] C
    to["$21$"] cycle;
    draw (5,.5) node[below] D to["$12$"] ++ (0, 3) node[above] E
    to ++ (2,-3) node[below] F
    to["$x$"] cycle;
    endtikzpicture

    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer



























      3














      an alternative, using relative coordinates tikz libraryquotes for labeling lines in triangles:



      documentclassarticle
      usepackageamsmath,amssymb % amsfonts is loaded by amsymb
      usepackagetikz
      usetikzlibraryquotes

      begindocument

      begintikzpicture
      draw (0, 0) node[below] A to["$x+29$"] ++ (0, 4) node[above] B
      to ++ (3,-4) node[below] C
      to["$21$"] cycle;
      draw (5,.5) node[below] D to["$12$"] ++ (0, 3) node[above] E
      to ++ (2,-3) node[below] F
      to["$x$"] cycle;
      endtikzpicture

      enddocument


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer

























        3












        3








        3







        an alternative, using relative coordinates tikz libraryquotes for labeling lines in triangles:



        documentclassarticle
        usepackageamsmath,amssymb % amsfonts is loaded by amsymb
        usepackagetikz
        usetikzlibraryquotes

        begindocument

        begintikzpicture
        draw (0, 0) node[below] A to["$x+29$"] ++ (0, 4) node[above] B
        to ++ (3,-4) node[below] C
        to["$21$"] cycle;
        draw (5,.5) node[below] D to["$12$"] ++ (0, 3) node[above] E
        to ++ (2,-3) node[below] F
        to["$x$"] cycle;
        endtikzpicture

        enddocument


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer













        an alternative, using relative coordinates tikz libraryquotes for labeling lines in triangles:



        documentclassarticle
        usepackageamsmath,amssymb % amsfonts is loaded by amsymb
        usepackagetikz
        usetikzlibraryquotes

        begindocument

        begintikzpicture
        draw (0, 0) node[below] A to["$x+29$"] ++ (0, 4) node[above] B
        to ++ (3,-4) node[below] C
        to["$21$"] cycle;
        draw (5,.5) node[below] D to["$12$"] ++ (0, 3) node[above] E
        to ++ (2,-3) node[below] F
        to["$x$"] cycle;
        endtikzpicture

        enddocument


        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Apr 6 at 4:50









        ZarkoZarko

        129k868169




        129k868169




















            Lex_i is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Lex_i is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Lex_i is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Lex_i is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483446%2fhow-do-i-draw-and-define-two-right-triangles-next-to-each-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Sum ergo cogito? 1 nng

            419 nièngy_Soadمي 19bal1.5o_g

            Queiggey Chernihivv 9NnOo i Zw X QqKk LpB