Greco-Roman egalitarianismA cunning involutionA Simple Puzzle - A bus DriverI don't exist yet. Help me fix that!The magical water drumAn eager refusalThe followed and the followerHow to tell one's right/leftThe round tableReading in the dark, faster than lightGuess a common 5-letter word!

Meta programming: Declare a new struct on the fly

How can I successfully establish a nationwide combat training program for a large country?

How to prevent YouTube from showing already watched videos?

For airliners, what prevents wing strikes on landing in bad weather?

Can a malicious addon access internet history and such in chrome/firefox?

Can a Gentile theist be saved?

Why are all the doors on Ferenginar (the Ferengi home world) far shorter than the average Ferengi?

Installing PowerShell on 32-bit Kali OS fails

Have I saved too much for retirement so far?

Simple recursive Sudoku solver

Books on the History of math research at European universities

Lightning Web Component - do I need to track changes for every single input field in a form

What was required to accept "troll"?

Can a Bard use an arcane focus?

Invariance of results when scaling explanatory variables in logistic regression, is there a proof?

Is there an Impartial Brexit Deal comparison site?

Partial sums of primes

Organic chemistry Iodoform Reaction

Who must act to prevent Brexit on March 29th?

I2C signal and power over long range (10meter cable)

Can somebody explain Brexit in a few child-proof sentences?

Freedom of speech and where it applies

Reply ‘no position’ while the job posting is still there (‘HiWi’ position in Germany)

I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?



Greco-Roman egalitarianism


A cunning involutionA Simple Puzzle - A bus DriverI don't exist yet. Help me fix that!The magical water drumAn eager refusalThe followed and the followerHow to tell one's right/leftThe round tableReading in the dark, faster than lightGuess a common 5-letter word!













9












$begingroup$


Athenian democracy
is a cornerstone of egalitarianism. One person, one vote. Everyone.



Here's something, though, Athenians mightn't've imagined:




I = II = III
IV = V = VI = VII = VIII
IX = X = XI = XII = XIII
XIV = XV = XVI = XVII = XVIII = IL = L = LI = LII = LIII
XIX = XX = XXI = XXII = XXIII = ... ?
XXIV = XXV = XXVI = XXVII = XXVIII = ... ?
XXIX = XXX = XXXI = XXXII = XXXIII = ... ?



Can you imagine it?



Please fill in the right side ... ?s and explain.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Apology for the lack of more specific tags: They would give away the solution.
    $endgroup$
    – humn
    yesterday















9












$begingroup$


Athenian democracy
is a cornerstone of egalitarianism. One person, one vote. Everyone.



Here's something, though, Athenians mightn't've imagined:




I = II = III
IV = V = VI = VII = VIII
IX = X = XI = XII = XIII
XIV = XV = XVI = XVII = XVIII = IL = L = LI = LII = LIII
XIX = XX = XXI = XXII = XXIII = ... ?
XXIV = XXV = XXVI = XXVII = XXVIII = ... ?
XXIX = XXX = XXXI = XXXII = XXXIII = ... ?



Can you imagine it?



Please fill in the right side ... ?s and explain.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Apology for the lack of more specific tags: They would give away the solution.
    $endgroup$
    – humn
    yesterday













9












9








9


1



$begingroup$


Athenian democracy
is a cornerstone of egalitarianism. One person, one vote. Everyone.



Here's something, though, Athenians mightn't've imagined:




I = II = III
IV = V = VI = VII = VIII
IX = X = XI = XII = XIII
XIV = XV = XVI = XVII = XVIII = IL = L = LI = LII = LIII
XIX = XX = XXI = XXII = XXIII = ... ?
XXIV = XXV = XXVI = XXVII = XXVIII = ... ?
XXIX = XXX = XXXI = XXXII = XXXIII = ... ?



Can you imagine it?



Please fill in the right side ... ?s and explain.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Athenian democracy
is a cornerstone of egalitarianism. One person, one vote. Everyone.



Here's something, though, Athenians mightn't've imagined:




I = II = III
IV = V = VI = VII = VIII
IX = X = XI = XII = XIII
XIV = XV = XVI = XVII = XVIII = IL = L = LI = LII = LIII
XIX = XX = XXI = XXII = XXIII = ... ?
XXIV = XXV = XXVI = XXVII = XXVIII = ... ?
XXIX = XXX = XXXI = XXXII = XXXIII = ... ?



Can you imagine it?



Please fill in the right side ... ?s and explain.







lateral-thinking






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday







humn

















asked yesterday









humnhumn

14.7k442132




14.7k442132











  • $begingroup$
    Apology for the lack of more specific tags: They would give away the solution.
    $endgroup$
    – humn
    yesterday
















  • $begingroup$
    Apology for the lack of more specific tags: They would give away the solution.
    $endgroup$
    – humn
    yesterday















$begingroup$
Apology for the lack of more specific tags: They would give away the solution.
$endgroup$
– humn
yesterday




$begingroup$
Apology for the lack of more specific tags: They would give away the solution.
$endgroup$
– humn
yesterday










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

Equal numbers are those with




equal products of Roman numerals




so the blanks are




IC = C = CI = CII = CIII

ID = D = DI = DII = DIII

IM = M = MI = MII = MIII







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
    $endgroup$
    – humn
    yesterday







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @HenningMakholm Very interesting!
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    yesterday










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80996%2fgreco-roman-egalitarianism%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6












$begingroup$

Equal numbers are those with




equal products of Roman numerals




so the blanks are




IC = C = CI = CII = CIII

ID = D = DI = DII = DIII

IM = M = MI = MII = MIII







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
    $endgroup$
    – humn
    yesterday







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @HenningMakholm Very interesting!
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    yesterday















6












$begingroup$

Equal numbers are those with




equal products of Roman numerals




so the blanks are




IC = C = CI = CII = CIII

ID = D = DI = DII = DIII

IM = M = MI = MII = MIII







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
    $endgroup$
    – humn
    yesterday







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @HenningMakholm Very interesting!
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    yesterday













6












6








6





$begingroup$

Equal numbers are those with




equal products of Roman numerals




so the blanks are




IC = C = CI = CII = CIII

ID = D = DI = DII = DIII

IM = M = MI = MII = MIII







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Equal numbers are those with




equal products of Roman numerals




so the blanks are




IC = C = CI = CII = CIII

ID = D = DI = DII = DIII

IM = M = MI = MII = MIII








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited yesterday

























answered yesterday









noednenoedne

7,60212160




7,60212160







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
    $endgroup$
    – humn
    yesterday







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @HenningMakholm Very interesting!
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    yesterday












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
    $endgroup$
    – humn
    yesterday







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @HenningMakholm Very interesting!
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    yesterday







2




2




$begingroup$
@humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
$endgroup$
– noedne
yesterday




$begingroup$
@humn Is IL a valid Roman numeral?
$endgroup$
– noedne
yesterday












$begingroup$
Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
$endgroup$
– humn
yesterday





$begingroup$
Got me. @noedne! Formally it would be XLIX, which would overflow.
$endgroup$
– humn
yesterday





2




2




$begingroup$
The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
yesterday




$begingroup$
The ancient Romans never bothered (as far as the surviving sources tell us) to agree on a particular authoritative specification for how their notation for numbers worked -- and in the absence of that, speaking about "valid" representations misses the point somewhat. It's certainly true that the modern tradition tends to frown on notations such as IL, but the actual Roman practice was less rigid than that. (For example there is apparently one attested use of XXCIIII for 84).
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
yesterday




1




1




$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Very interesting!
$endgroup$
– noedne
yesterday




$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Very interesting!
$endgroup$
– noedne
yesterday

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80996%2fgreco-roman-egalitarianism%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Sum ergo cogito? 1 nng

419 nièngy_Soadمي 19bal1.5o_g

Queiggey Chernihivv 9NnOo i Zw X QqKk LpB