Alignment of six matricesWhy does aligning equations not work here?Multiple matrix equations, alignmentMultiple alignmentAlignment with bracketsWhy align environement does not work with “extract ”package?Align matrices problemAlignment and line breaking in alignment environmentAllow page breaks in a gather environment with a nested alignEquation Alignment with Hierarchical Left AlignmentLong series alignmentMultiple = alignmentMultiline equation with matrices
Shouldn’t conservatives embrace universal basic income?
Do we have to expect a queue for the shuttle from Watford Junction to Harry Potter Studio?
Review your own paper in Mathematics
How would you translate "more" for use as an interface button?
It grows, but water kills it
What fields between the rationals and the reals allow a good notion of 2D distance?
"It doesn't matter" or "it won't matter"?
Does the reader need to like the PoV character?
Why is so much work done on numerical verification of the Riemann Hypothesis?
Short story about a deaf man, who cuts people tongues
Biological Blimps: Propulsion
How can ping know if my host is down
How to convince somebody that he is fit for something else, but not this job?
Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos breaking the Tesseract and claiming the stone?
How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?
How does electrical safety system work on ISS?
Why is the "ls" command showing permissions of files in a FAT32 partition?
Is this part of the description of the Archfey warlock's Misty Escape feature redundant?
Will number of steps recorded on FitBit/any fitness tracker add up distance in PokemonGo?
Mimic lecturing on blackboard, facing audience
Is there a nicer/politer/more positive alternative for "negates"?
Were Persian-Median kings illiterate?
What's the name of the logical fallacy where a debater extends a statement far beyond the original statement to make it true?
Taxes on Dividends in a Roth IRA
Alignment of six matrices
Why does aligning equations not work here?Multiple matrix equations, alignmentMultiple alignmentAlignment with bracketsWhy align environement does not work with “extract ”package?Align matrices problemAlignment and line breaking in alignment environmentAllow page breaks in a gather environment with a nested alignEquation Alignment with Hierarchical Left AlignmentLong series alignmentMultiple = alignmentMultiline equation with matrices
5
I'm currently facing a problem with the align environment. I'd like to write six matrices in two rows, aligned on each equal sign per column. The problem is that I can't figure out how to do this with the align environment for some reason. I've read the related posts here and here, where [1] seems to be a bit of an overkill for my problem and [2] doesn't work for some reason...
An MWE to the problem:
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
begindocument
beginalign*
I _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
endpmatrix,
I _ 2 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
I _ 3 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix, \
J _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
J _ 2 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
J _ 3 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix.
endalign*
enddocument
Note: I'm aware that most of the are useless here but the matrices were generated by Mathpix....
align
edited yesterday
Bernard
174k776205
asked yesterday
Marius JaegerMarius Jaeger
404
New contributor
Marius Jaeger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
5
I'm currently facing a problem with the align environment. I'd like to write six matrices in two rows, aligned on each equal sign per column. The problem is that I can't figure out how to do this with the align environment for some reason. I've read the related posts here and here, where [1] seems to be a bit of an overkill for my problem and [2] doesn't work for some reason...
An MWE to the problem:
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
begindocument
beginalign*
I _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
endpmatrix,
I _ 2 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
I _ 3 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix, \
J _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
J _ 2 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
J _ 3 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix.
endalign*
enddocument
Note: I'm aware that most of the are useless here but the matrices were generated by Mathpix....
align
edited yesterday
Bernard
174k776205
asked yesterday
Marius JaegerMarius Jaeger
404
New contributor
Marius Jaeger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
5
5
5
1
I'm currently facing a problem with the align environment. I'd like to write six matrices in two rows, aligned on each equal sign per column. The problem is that I can't figure out how to do this with the align environment for some reason. I've read the related posts here and here, where [1] seems to be a bit of an overkill for my problem and [2] doesn't work for some reason...
An MWE to the problem:
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
begindocument
beginalign*
I _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
endpmatrix,
I _ 2 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
I _ 3 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix, \
J _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
J _ 2 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
J _ 3 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix.
endalign*
enddocument
Note: I'm aware that most of the are useless here but the matrices were generated by Mathpix....
align
edited yesterday
Bernard
174k776205
asked yesterday
Marius JaegerMarius Jaeger
404
New contributor
Marius Jaeger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I'm currently facing a problem with the align environment. I'd like to write six matrices in two rows, aligned on each equal sign per column. The problem is that I can't figure out how to do this with the align environment for some reason. I've read the related posts here and here, where [1] seems to be a bit of an overkill for my problem and [2] doesn't work for some reason...
An MWE to the problem:
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
begindocument
beginalign*
I _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
endpmatrix,
I _ 2 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
I _ 3 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix, \
J _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
J _ 2 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
J _ 3 &&=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix.
endalign*
enddocument
Note: I'm aware that most of the are useless here but the matrices were generated by Mathpix....
align
align
edited yesterday
Bernard
174k776205
asked yesterday
Marius JaegerMarius Jaeger
404
New contributor
Marius Jaeger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited yesterday
Bernard
174k776205
asked yesterday
Marius JaegerMarius Jaeger
404
New contributor
Marius Jaeger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited yesterday
Bernard
174k776205
edited yesterday
Bernard
174k776205
edited yesterday
Bernard
174k776205
174k776205
asked yesterday
Marius JaegerMarius Jaeger
404
New contributor
Marius Jaeger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked yesterday
Marius JaegerMarius Jaeger
404
asked yesterday
Marius JaegerMarius Jaeger
404
404
New contributor
Marius Jaeger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Marius Jaeger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Marius Jaeger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
7
I just moved the &
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
begindocument
beginalign*
I _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
endpmatrix,
&I _ 2 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&I _ 3 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix, \
J _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&J _ 2 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&J _ 3 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix.
endalign*
enddocument
answered yesterday
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
495k4111401888
David and his movement made me feel good.
– manooooh
yesterday
1
@marmot I didn't look at them (as I say I just moved the&) but what about them?
– David Carlisle
yesterday
@marmot not a sign change between a test file and a supplied example, you are assuming that is the meaning of these matrices:-)
– David Carlisle
yesterday
@marmot TeX takes no position on mathematical accuracy, so long as it looks nice.
– David Carlisle
yesterday
@marmot in that case, which convention do you prefer?^^
– Marius Jaeger
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
6
Uniform alignment everywhere...
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
usepackagetabstackengine
setstacktabbedgap1ex
begindocument
fixTABwidthT
beginalign*
I _ 1 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
,&
I _ 2 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
, &
I _ 3 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
, \
J _ 1 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
,&
J _ 2 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
,&
J _ 3 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
.
endalign*
enddocument
answered yesterday
Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes
159k9204411
2
These matrices align nicely because I and J happen to be about the same width. But if they had instead been I and M, the alignment would have been different. Better to put the "second"&before the = sign in each instance.
– barbara beeton
yesterday
@barbarabeeton Thanks for the great suggestion. Only clarification is that in TABstackengine, the&should, by default, follow the=rather than precede it.
– Steven B. Segletes
yesterday
@steven : This solution doesn't compile with overleaf.com, error at line 51.
– pzorba75
yesterday
@pzorba75 Sorry I cannot assist...I am not an overleaf user.
– Steven B. Segletes
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Marius Jaeger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480550%2falignment-of-six-matrices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
7
I just moved the &
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
begindocument
beginalign*
I _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
endpmatrix,
&I _ 2 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&I _ 3 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix, \
J _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&J _ 2 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&J _ 3 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix.
endalign*
enddocument
answered yesterday
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
495k4111401888
David and his movement made me feel good.
– manooooh
yesterday
1
@marmot I didn't look at them (as I say I just moved the&) but what about them?
– David Carlisle
yesterday
@marmot not a sign change between a test file and a supplied example, you are assuming that is the meaning of these matrices:-)
– David Carlisle
yesterday
@marmot TeX takes no position on mathematical accuracy, so long as it looks nice.
– David Carlisle
yesterday
@marmot in that case, which convention do you prefer?^^
– Marius Jaeger
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
7
I just moved the &
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
begindocument
beginalign*
I _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
endpmatrix,
&I _ 2 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&I _ 3 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix, \
J _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&J _ 2 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&J _ 3 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix.
endalign*
enddocument
answered yesterday
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
495k4111401888
David and his movement made me feel good.
– manooooh
yesterday
1
@marmot I didn't look at them (as I say I just moved the&) but what about them?
– David Carlisle
yesterday
@marmot not a sign change between a test file and a supplied example, you are assuming that is the meaning of these matrices:-)
– David Carlisle
yesterday
@marmot TeX takes no position on mathematical accuracy, so long as it looks nice.
– David Carlisle
yesterday
@marmot in that case, which convention do you prefer?^^
– Marius Jaeger
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
7
7
7
I just moved the &
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
begindocument
beginalign*
I _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
endpmatrix,
&I _ 2 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&I _ 3 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix, \
J _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&J _ 2 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&J _ 3 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix.
endalign*
enddocument
answered yesterday
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
495k4111401888
I just moved the &
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
begindocument
beginalign*
I _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
endpmatrix,
&I _ 2 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&I _ 3 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix, \
J _ 1 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&J _ 2 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix,
&J _ 3 &=
beginpmatrix
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
endpmatrix.
endalign*
enddocument
answered yesterday
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
495k4111401888
answered yesterday
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
495k4111401888
answered yesterday
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
495k4111401888
answered yesterday
David CarlisleDavid Carlisle
495k4111401888
495k4111401888
David and his movement made me feel good.
– manooooh
yesterday
1
@marmot I didn't look at them (as I say I just moved the&) but what about them?
– David Carlisle
yesterday
@marmot not a sign change between a test file and a supplied example, you are assuming that is the meaning of these matrices:-)
– David Carlisle
yesterday
@marmot TeX takes no position on mathematical accuracy, so long as it looks nice.
– David Carlisle
yesterday
@marmot in that case, which convention do you prefer?^^
– Marius Jaeger
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
David and his movement made me feel good.
– manooooh
yesterday
1
@marmot I didn't look at them (as I say I just moved the&) but what about them?
– David Carlisle
yesterday
@marmot not a sign change between a test file and a supplied example, you are assuming that is the meaning of these matrices:-)
– David Carlisle
yesterday
@marmot TeX takes no position on mathematical accuracy, so long as it looks nice.
– David Carlisle
yesterday
@marmot in that case, which convention do you prefer?^^
– Marius Jaeger
yesterday
David and his movement made me feel good.
– manooooh
yesterday
David and his movement made me feel good.
– manooooh
yesterday
1
1
@marmot I didn't look at them (as I say I just moved the
& ) but what about them?– David Carlisle
yesterday
@marmot I didn't look at them (as I say I just moved the
& ) but what about them?– David Carlisle
yesterday
@marmot not a sign change between a test file and a supplied example, you are assuming that is the meaning of these matrices:-)
– David Carlisle
yesterday
@marmot not a sign change between a test file and a supplied example, you are assuming that is the meaning of these matrices:-)
– David Carlisle
yesterday
@marmot TeX takes no position on mathematical accuracy, so long as it looks nice.
– David Carlisle
yesterday
@marmot TeX takes no position on mathematical accuracy, so long as it looks nice.
– David Carlisle
yesterday
@marmot in that case, which convention do you prefer?^^
– Marius Jaeger
yesterday
@marmot in that case, which convention do you prefer?^^
– Marius Jaeger
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
6
Uniform alignment everywhere...
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
usepackagetabstackengine
setstacktabbedgap1ex
begindocument
fixTABwidthT
beginalign*
I _ 1 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
,&
I _ 2 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
, &
I _ 3 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
, \
J _ 1 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
,&
J _ 2 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
,&
J _ 3 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
.
endalign*
enddocument
answered yesterday
Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes
159k9204411
2
These matrices align nicely because I and J happen to be about the same width. But if they had instead been I and M, the alignment would have been different. Better to put the "second"&before the = sign in each instance.
– barbara beeton
yesterday
@barbarabeeton Thanks for the great suggestion. Only clarification is that in TABstackengine, the&should, by default, follow the=rather than precede it.
– Steven B. Segletes
yesterday
@steven : This solution doesn't compile with overleaf.com, error at line 51.
– pzorba75
yesterday
@pzorba75 Sorry I cannot assist...I am not an overleaf user.
– Steven B. Segletes
yesterday
add a comment |
6
Uniform alignment everywhere...
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
usepackagetabstackengine
setstacktabbedgap1ex
begindocument
fixTABwidthT
beginalign*
I _ 1 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
,&
I _ 2 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
, &
I _ 3 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
, \
J _ 1 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
,&
J _ 2 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
,&
J _ 3 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
.
endalign*
enddocument
answered yesterday
Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes
159k9204411
2
These matrices align nicely because I and J happen to be about the same width. But if they had instead been I and M, the alignment would have been different. Better to put the "second"&before the = sign in each instance.
– barbara beeton
yesterday
@barbarabeeton Thanks for the great suggestion. Only clarification is that in TABstackengine, the&should, by default, follow the=rather than precede it.
– Steven B. Segletes
yesterday
@steven : This solution doesn't compile with overleaf.com, error at line 51.
– pzorba75
yesterday
@pzorba75 Sorry I cannot assist...I am not an overleaf user.
– Steven B. Segletes
yesterday
add a comment |
6
6
6
Uniform alignment everywhere...
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
usepackagetabstackengine
setstacktabbedgap1ex
begindocument
fixTABwidthT
beginalign*
I _ 1 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
,&
I _ 2 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
, &
I _ 3 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
, \
J _ 1 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
,&
J _ 2 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
,&
J _ 3 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
.
endalign*
enddocument
answered yesterday
Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes
159k9204411
Uniform alignment everywhere...
documentclassarticle
usepackage[margin=2.5cm]geometry
usepackageamssymb, amsthm, mathtools
usepackagetabstackengine
setstacktabbedgap1ex
begindocument
fixTABwidthT
beginalign*
I _ 1 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & - 1 & 0
,&
I _ 2 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0
, &
I _ 3 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
, \
J _ 1 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
,&
J _ 2 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
-1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0
,&
J _ 3 =&
parenMatrixstack[r]
0 & 0 & 0 & - 1 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
- 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
.
endalign*
enddocument
answered yesterday
Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes
159k9204411
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes
159k9204411
answered yesterday
Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes
159k9204411
answered yesterday
Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes
159k9204411
159k9204411
2
These matrices align nicely because I and J happen to be about the same width. But if they had instead been I and M, the alignment would have been different. Better to put the "second"&before the = sign in each instance.
– barbara beeton
yesterday
@barbarabeeton Thanks for the great suggestion. Only clarification is that in TABstackengine, the&should, by default, follow the=rather than precede it.
– Steven B. Segletes
yesterday
@steven : This solution doesn't compile with overleaf.com, error at line 51.
– pzorba75
yesterday
@pzorba75 Sorry I cannot assist...I am not an overleaf user.
– Steven B. Segletes
yesterday
add a comment |
2
These matrices align nicely because I and J happen to be about the same width. But if they had instead been I and M, the alignment would have been different. Better to put the "second"&before the = sign in each instance.
– barbara beeton
yesterday
@barbarabeeton Thanks for the great suggestion. Only clarification is that in TABstackengine, the&should, by default, follow the=rather than precede it.
– Steven B. Segletes
yesterday
@steven : This solution doesn't compile with overleaf.com, error at line 51.
– pzorba75
yesterday
@pzorba75 Sorry I cannot assist...I am not an overleaf user.
– Steven B. Segletes
yesterday
2
2
These matrices align nicely because I and J happen to be about the same width. But if they had instead been I and M, the alignment would have been different. Better to put the "second"
& before the = sign in each instance.– barbara beeton
yesterday
These matrices align nicely because I and J happen to be about the same width. But if they had instead been I and M, the alignment would have been different. Better to put the "second"
& before the = sign in each instance.– barbara beeton
yesterday
@barbarabeeton Thanks for the great suggestion. Only clarification is that in TABstackengine, the
& should, by default, follow the = rather than precede it.– Steven B. Segletes
yesterday
@barbarabeeton Thanks for the great suggestion. Only clarification is that in TABstackengine, the
& should, by default, follow the = rather than precede it.– Steven B. Segletes
yesterday
@steven : This solution doesn't compile with overleaf.com, error at line 51.
– pzorba75
yesterday
@steven : This solution doesn't compile with overleaf.com, error at line 51.
– pzorba75
yesterday
@pzorba75 Sorry I cannot assist...I am not an overleaf user.
– Steven B. Segletes
yesterday
@pzorba75 Sorry I cannot assist...I am not an overleaf user.
– Steven B. Segletes
yesterday
add a comment |
Marius Jaeger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
draft saved
draft discarded
Marius Jaeger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Marius Jaeger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Marius Jaeger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480550%2falignment-of-six-matrices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
