Can one hide a text in an image and then hide that image in another image? [on hold]Rating a steganographic system using Blum Blum Shub to locate hidden bitsMaking my steganography code more hard to detect and crackTurning data into seemingly random noiseMaximum steganographic embedding rate not detectable by steganalysis?Is it worth hiding an AES encrypted text string in a PNG image for better security?Is there an algorithm to hide text in another text, while preserving the meaning of the latter?Are there any practical methods of steganography?Is my high school cryptography/steganography science fair project practical?Steganography - How many bytes of information can you hide in a $1024 times 768$ photo?Extracting the hidden text off an image embedded with steganography
Why is current rating for multicore cable lower than single core with the same cross section?
Why does Bran Stark feel that Jon Snow "needs to know" about his lineage?
Modify locally tikzset
How did Arya manage the sneak attack?
Does a creature that is immune to a condition still make a saving throw?
Historically, were women trained for obligatory wars? Or did they serve some other military function?
What is the real-life benefit and application of Bayesian regression
Given what happens in Endgame, why doesn't Dormammu come back to attack the universe?
What does "rf" mean in "rfkill"?
What is the strongest case that can be made in favour of the UK regaining some control over fishing policy after Brexit?
Build a trail cart
CRT Oscilloscope - part of the plot is missing
When did stoichiometry begin to be taught in U.S. high schools?
How do I tell my manager that he's wrong?
Reverse the word in a string with the same order in javascript
Stark VS Thanos
Tikz oriented simplex
Can a creature tell when it has been affected by a Divination wizard's Portent?
What are the spoon bit of a spoon and fork bit of a fork called?
Do I have to worry about players making “bad” choices on level up?
Why was Germany not as successful as other Europeans in establishing overseas colonies?
Volunteering in England
Why “le” behind?
Examples of non trivial equivalence relations , I mean equivalence relations without the expression " same ... as" in their definition?
Can one hide a text in an image and then hide that image in another image? [on hold]
Rating a steganographic system using Blum Blum Shub to locate hidden bitsMaking my steganography code more hard to detect and crackTurning data into seemingly random noiseMaximum steganographic embedding rate not detectable by steganalysis?Is it worth hiding an AES encrypted text string in a PNG image for better security?Is there an algorithm to hide text in another text, while preserving the meaning of the latter?Are there any practical methods of steganography?Is my high school cryptography/steganography science fair project practical?Steganography - How many bytes of information can you hide in a $1024 times 768$ photo?Extracting the hidden text off an image embedded with steganography
$begingroup$
Using a steganographic algorithm like least significant bit, can one hide a text in an image and then hide that image in another image?
steganography
New contributor
$endgroup$
put on hold as off-topic by e-sushi, AleksanderRas, Maarten Bodewes♦ 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Programming questions are off-topic even if you are writing or debugging cryptographic code. Unless your question is specifically about how the cryptographic algorithm, protocol or side-channel (mitigation) works, you should look into asking on Stack Overflow instead." – e-sushi, AleksanderRas
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using a steganographic algorithm like least significant bit, can one hide a text in an image and then hide that image in another image?
steganography
New contributor
$endgroup$
put on hold as off-topic by e-sushi, AleksanderRas, Maarten Bodewes♦ 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Programming questions are off-topic even if you are writing or debugging cryptographic code. Unless your question is specifically about how the cryptographic algorithm, protocol or side-channel (mitigation) works, you should look into asking on Stack Overflow instead." – e-sushi, AleksanderRas
1
$begingroup$
Daniel has already answered. I suspect however that if you have already found the image hidden in the other image that stenography is now kind expected, removing most of the surprise factor. So while it is possible, it is questionable if such a scheme makes any sense.
$endgroup$
– Maarten Bodewes♦
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because questions about steganography are only valid if they are about keyed steganography, as that would make them a form of cryptography. More information here
$endgroup$
– Maarten Bodewes♦
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using a steganographic algorithm like least significant bit, can one hide a text in an image and then hide that image in another image?
steganography
New contributor
$endgroup$
Using a steganographic algorithm like least significant bit, can one hide a text in an image and then hide that image in another image?
steganography
steganography
New contributor
New contributor
edited 2 days ago
Rodrigo de Azevedo
1356
1356
New contributor
asked Apr 25 at 6:50
Paps JhonPaps Jhon
141
141
New contributor
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by e-sushi, AleksanderRas, Maarten Bodewes♦ 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Programming questions are off-topic even if you are writing or debugging cryptographic code. Unless your question is specifically about how the cryptographic algorithm, protocol or side-channel (mitigation) works, you should look into asking on Stack Overflow instead." – e-sushi, AleksanderRas
put on hold as off-topic by e-sushi, AleksanderRas, Maarten Bodewes♦ 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Programming questions are off-topic even if you are writing or debugging cryptographic code. Unless your question is specifically about how the cryptographic algorithm, protocol or side-channel (mitigation) works, you should look into asking on Stack Overflow instead." – e-sushi, AleksanderRas
1
$begingroup$
Daniel has already answered. I suspect however that if you have already found the image hidden in the other image that stenography is now kind expected, removing most of the surprise factor. So while it is possible, it is questionable if such a scheme makes any sense.
$endgroup$
– Maarten Bodewes♦
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because questions about steganography are only valid if they are about keyed steganography, as that would make them a form of cryptography. More information here
$endgroup$
– Maarten Bodewes♦
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Daniel has already answered. I suspect however that if you have already found the image hidden in the other image that stenography is now kind expected, removing most of the surprise factor. So while it is possible, it is questionable if such a scheme makes any sense.
$endgroup$
– Maarten Bodewes♦
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because questions about steganography are only valid if they are about keyed steganography, as that would make them a form of cryptography. More information here
$endgroup$
– Maarten Bodewes♦
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Daniel has already answered. I suspect however that if you have already found the image hidden in the other image that stenography is now kind expected, removing most of the surprise factor. So while it is possible, it is questionable if such a scheme makes any sense.
$endgroup$
– Maarten Bodewes♦
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Daniel has already answered. I suspect however that if you have already found the image hidden in the other image that stenography is now kind expected, removing most of the surprise factor. So while it is possible, it is questionable if such a scheme makes any sense.
$endgroup$
– Maarten Bodewes♦
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because questions about steganography are only valid if they are about keyed steganography, as that would make them a form of cryptography. More information here
$endgroup$
– Maarten Bodewes♦
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because questions about steganography are only valid if they are about keyed steganography, as that would make them a form of cryptography. More information here
$endgroup$
– Maarten Bodewes♦
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes!
For bitmap images, if you use all the pixels of the image (bad idea, it's very detectable) you need a first image 8/3 times bigger than the size of the text you want to hide (you can compress it).
- 8 because you need 8 pixels to hide one byte (one bit per pixel).
- 1/3 with color images, because you can hide a bit per channel/pixel.
After this, you can hide this image into another image 8 times bigger (again, 1 byte into 8 pixels).
For JPEG images the approach is different, because you are hiding information into the DCT coefficients. But it's the same idea.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes!
For bitmap images, if you use all the pixels of the image (bad idea, it's very detectable) you need a first image 8/3 times bigger than the size of the text you want to hide (you can compress it).
- 8 because you need 8 pixels to hide one byte (one bit per pixel).
- 1/3 with color images, because you can hide a bit per channel/pixel.
After this, you can hide this image into another image 8 times bigger (again, 1 byte into 8 pixels).
For JPEG images the approach is different, because you are hiding information into the DCT coefficients. But it's the same idea.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes!
For bitmap images, if you use all the pixels of the image (bad idea, it's very detectable) you need a first image 8/3 times bigger than the size of the text you want to hide (you can compress it).
- 8 because you need 8 pixels to hide one byte (one bit per pixel).
- 1/3 with color images, because you can hide a bit per channel/pixel.
After this, you can hide this image into another image 8 times bigger (again, 1 byte into 8 pixels).
For JPEG images the approach is different, because you are hiding information into the DCT coefficients. But it's the same idea.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes!
For bitmap images, if you use all the pixels of the image (bad idea, it's very detectable) you need a first image 8/3 times bigger than the size of the text you want to hide (you can compress it).
- 8 because you need 8 pixels to hide one byte (one bit per pixel).
- 1/3 with color images, because you can hide a bit per channel/pixel.
After this, you can hide this image into another image 8 times bigger (again, 1 byte into 8 pixels).
For JPEG images the approach is different, because you are hiding information into the DCT coefficients. But it's the same idea.
$endgroup$
Yes!
For bitmap images, if you use all the pixels of the image (bad idea, it's very detectable) you need a first image 8/3 times bigger than the size of the text you want to hide (you can compress it).
- 8 because you need 8 pixels to hide one byte (one bit per pixel).
- 1/3 with color images, because you can hide a bit per channel/pixel.
After this, you can hide this image into another image 8 times bigger (again, 1 byte into 8 pixels).
For JPEG images the approach is different, because you are hiding information into the DCT coefficients. But it's the same idea.
edited Apr 25 at 15:37
Ella Rose♦
17.1k44586
17.1k44586
answered Apr 25 at 7:41
Daniel LerchDaniel Lerch
26624
26624
add a comment |
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Daniel has already answered. I suspect however that if you have already found the image hidden in the other image that stenography is now kind expected, removing most of the surprise factor. So while it is possible, it is questionable if such a scheme makes any sense.
$endgroup$
– Maarten Bodewes♦
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because questions about steganography are only valid if they are about keyed steganography, as that would make them a form of cryptography. More information here
$endgroup$
– Maarten Bodewes♦
2 days ago