Basic combinations logic doubt in probability The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InProbability of picking three marbles in ordergetting an outcome x number of attemptsProbability of a certain outcomeProbability of drawing colored MarblesProbability with changing number of marblesExpected number o f draws with replacement to reach probability.Probability that the first marble was blue, given the second is blueGiven a bag of 3 red marbles, 5 black, and 8 green, what is the probability that?A bag contains contains 20 blue marbles, 20 green marbles, and 20 red marblesMarble probability without replacement question

Why can Shazam fly?

Identify boardgame from Big movie

Can one be advised by a professor who is very far away?

Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?

Am I thawing this London Broil safely?

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

Why did Acorn's A3000 have red function keys?

If a Druid sees an animal’s corpse, can they wild shape into that animal?

What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

Apparent duplicates between Haynes service instructions and MOT

Geography at the pixel level

What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?

Which Sci-Fi work first showed weapon of galactic-scale mass destruction?

Earliest use of the term "Galois extension"?

Falsification in Math vs Science

Did Section 31 appear in Star Trek: The Next Generation?

Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

How to save as into a customized destination on macOS?

Shouldn't "much" here be used instead of "more"?

Is this app Icon Browser Safe/Legit?

Should I use my personal e-mail address, or my workplace one, when registering to external websites for work purposes?

Write faster on AT24C32



Basic combinations logic doubt in probability



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InProbability of picking three marbles in ordergetting an outcome x number of attemptsProbability of a certain outcomeProbability of drawing colored MarblesProbability with changing number of marblesExpected number o f draws with replacement to reach probability.Probability that the first marble was blue, given the second is blueGiven a bag of 3 red marbles, 5 black, and 8 green, what is the probability that?A bag contains contains 20 blue marbles, 20 green marbles, and 20 red marblesMarble probability without replacement question










3












$begingroup$



"If $3$ students are chosen at random from a class with $6$ girls and $4$ boys, what is the probability that all $3$ students chosen will be girls?"



$left(dfrac610right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)$




So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?



"A bag holds $4$ red marbles, $5$ blue marbles, and $2$ green marbles. If $5$ marbles are selected one after another without replacement, what is the probability of drawing $2$ red marbles, $2$ blue marbles, and $1$ green marble?"



My answer: $left(dfrac411right)left(dfrac310right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)left(dfrac27right)$



But the correct answer is $dfrac(_4C_2) cdot (_5C_2) cdot (_2C_1)_11C_5$ (where $C$ is a combination).



Why doesn't the logic from the first problem work here?



The draws are without replacement in all cases.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    Apr 7 at 10:08










  • $begingroup$
    @NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    Apr 7 at 10:11
















3












$begingroup$



"If $3$ students are chosen at random from a class with $6$ girls and $4$ boys, what is the probability that all $3$ students chosen will be girls?"



$left(dfrac610right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)$




So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?



"A bag holds $4$ red marbles, $5$ blue marbles, and $2$ green marbles. If $5$ marbles are selected one after another without replacement, what is the probability of drawing $2$ red marbles, $2$ blue marbles, and $1$ green marble?"



My answer: $left(dfrac411right)left(dfrac310right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)left(dfrac27right)$



But the correct answer is $dfrac(_4C_2) cdot (_5C_2) cdot (_2C_1)_11C_5$ (where $C$ is a combination).



Why doesn't the logic from the first problem work here?



The draws are without replacement in all cases.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    Apr 7 at 10:08










  • $begingroup$
    @NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    Apr 7 at 10:11














3












3








3


2



$begingroup$



"If $3$ students are chosen at random from a class with $6$ girls and $4$ boys, what is the probability that all $3$ students chosen will be girls?"



$left(dfrac610right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)$




So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?



"A bag holds $4$ red marbles, $5$ blue marbles, and $2$ green marbles. If $5$ marbles are selected one after another without replacement, what is the probability of drawing $2$ red marbles, $2$ blue marbles, and $1$ green marble?"



My answer: $left(dfrac411right)left(dfrac310right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)left(dfrac27right)$



But the correct answer is $dfrac(_4C_2) cdot (_5C_2) cdot (_2C_1)_11C_5$ (where $C$ is a combination).



Why doesn't the logic from the first problem work here?



The draws are without replacement in all cases.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





"If $3$ students are chosen at random from a class with $6$ girls and $4$ boys, what is the probability that all $3$ students chosen will be girls?"



$left(dfrac610right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)$




So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?



"A bag holds $4$ red marbles, $5$ blue marbles, and $2$ green marbles. If $5$ marbles are selected one after another without replacement, what is the probability of drawing $2$ red marbles, $2$ blue marbles, and $1$ green marble?"



My answer: $left(dfrac411right)left(dfrac310right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)left(dfrac27right)$



But the correct answer is $dfrac(_4C_2) cdot (_5C_2) cdot (_2C_1)_11C_5$ (where $C$ is a combination).



Why doesn't the logic from the first problem work here?



The draws are without replacement in all cases.







probability combinatorics permutations combinations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 7 at 15:22









Bladewood

337213




337213










asked Apr 7 at 9:34









LuckyLucky

295




295











  • $begingroup$
    Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    Apr 7 at 10:08










  • $begingroup$
    @NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    Apr 7 at 10:11

















  • $begingroup$
    Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    Apr 7 at 10:08










  • $begingroup$
    @NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    Apr 7 at 10:11
















$begingroup$
Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
$endgroup$
– NoChance
Apr 7 at 10:08




$begingroup$
Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
$endgroup$
– NoChance
Apr 7 at 10:08












$begingroup$
@NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
$endgroup$
– Lucky
Apr 7 at 10:11





$begingroup$
@NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
$endgroup$
– Lucky
Apr 7 at 10:11











4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
$$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
$$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    yesterday


















5












$begingroup$


"So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the probability of the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the probabitility of the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    You are very welcome.
    $endgroup$
    – drhab
    17 hours ago


















0












$begingroup$

The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



(6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    Apr 7 at 9:57











  • $begingroup$
    also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    Apr 7 at 10:02










  • $begingroup$
    @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
    $endgroup$
    – Ister
    2 days ago


















0












$begingroup$

The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
$$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177997%2fbasic-combinations-logic-doubt-in-probability%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7












    $begingroup$

    What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



    To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
    $$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



    Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
    $$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      yesterday















    7












    $begingroup$

    What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



    To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
    $$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



    Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
    $$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      yesterday













    7












    7








    7





    $begingroup$

    What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



    To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
    $$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



    Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
    $$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



    To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
    $$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



    Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
    $$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Apr 7 at 10:40









    N. F. TaussigN. F. Taussig

    45.1k103358




    45.1k103358







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      yesterday












    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      yesterday







    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    yesterday











    5












    $begingroup$


    "So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




    Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the probability of the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



    Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the probabitility of the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



    If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



    You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      You are very welcome.
      $endgroup$
      – drhab
      17 hours ago















    5












    $begingroup$


    "So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




    Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the probability of the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



    Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the probabitility of the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



    If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



    You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      You are very welcome.
      $endgroup$
      – drhab
      17 hours ago













    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$


    "So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




    Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the probability of the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



    Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the probabitility of the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



    If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



    You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$




    "So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




    Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the probability of the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



    Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the probabitility of the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



    If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



    You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 13 hours ago

























    answered Apr 7 at 10:36









    drhabdrhab

    104k545136




    104k545136







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      You are very welcome.
      $endgroup$
      – drhab
      17 hours ago












    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      You are very welcome.
      $endgroup$
      – drhab
      17 hours ago







    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    yesterday












    $begingroup$
    You are very welcome.
    $endgroup$
    – drhab
    17 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    You are very welcome.
    $endgroup$
    – drhab
    17 hours ago











    0












    $begingroup$

    The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



    This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



    We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



    (6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



    which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      Apr 7 at 9:57











    • $begingroup$
      also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      Apr 7 at 10:02










    • $begingroup$
      @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
      $endgroup$
      – Ister
      2 days ago















    0












    $begingroup$

    The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



    This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



    We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



    (6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



    which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      Apr 7 at 9:57











    • $begingroup$
      also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      Apr 7 at 10:02










    • $begingroup$
      @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
      $endgroup$
      – Ister
      2 days ago













    0












    0








    0





    $begingroup$

    The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



    This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



    We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



    (6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



    which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



    This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



    We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



    (6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



    which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Apr 7 at 9:44









    jflippjflipp

    3,7511711




    3,7511711











    • $begingroup$
      so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      Apr 7 at 9:57











    • $begingroup$
      also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      Apr 7 at 10:02










    • $begingroup$
      @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
      $endgroup$
      – Ister
      2 days ago
















    • $begingroup$
      so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      Apr 7 at 9:57











    • $begingroup$
      also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      Apr 7 at 10:02










    • $begingroup$
      @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
      $endgroup$
      – Ister
      2 days ago















    $begingroup$
    so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    Apr 7 at 9:57





    $begingroup$
    so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    Apr 7 at 9:57













    $begingroup$
    also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    Apr 7 at 10:02




    $begingroup$
    also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    Apr 7 at 10:02












    $begingroup$
    @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
    $endgroup$
    – Ister
    2 days ago




    $begingroup$
    @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
    $endgroup$
    – Ister
    2 days ago











    0












    $begingroup$

    The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
    $$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
    Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



    Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
      $$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
      Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



      Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
        $$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
        Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



        Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
        $$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
        Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



        Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Apr 7 at 10:53









        farruhotafarruhota

        21.9k2942




        21.9k2942



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177997%2fbasic-combinations-logic-doubt-in-probability%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Sum ergo cogito? 1 nng

            三茅街道4182Guuntc Dn precexpngmageondP