Dative vs AccusativeWelchen Fall verwendet man mit Präposition “ohne”?Which one is correct: “dir” or “dich”? Dative or Accusative?How are accusative and dative combined in one sentence?When to use dative or accusative object with “sitzen”?Dative or accusative object comes first?“dich” in “Ich glaube (an) dich” — accusative or dative?Dative and Accusative ConfusionAccusative or dative case, how to detect “action” and “movement”?Accusative vs Dative: “Schau in der/die Schublade!”The order of dative and accusative in a sentenceDative or Accusative first?

Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?

Are paving bricks differently sized for sand bedding vs mortar bedding?

dpdt switch to spst switch

Where does the bonus feat in the cleric starting package come from?

How to implement a feedback to keep the DC gain at zero for this conceptual passive filter?

Did Swami Prabhupada reject Advaita?

L1 and Ln cache: when are they written?

New brakes for 90s road bike

How can Trident be so inexpensive? Will it orbit Triton or just do a (slow) flyby?

Not using 's' for he/she/it

What does "Scientists rise up against statistical significance" mean? (Comment in Nature)

How to indicate a cut out for a product window

What should you do if you miss a job interview (deliberately)?

How can "mimic phobia" be cured or prevented?

Should I outline or discovery write my stories?

Symbol used to indicate indivisibility

What if a revenant (monster) gains fire resistance?

A social experiment. What is the worst that can happen?

Travelling outside the UK without a passport

Aragorn's "guise" in the Orthanc Stone

How should I respond when I lied about my education and the company finds out through background check?

is this legal and f i dont come up with extra money is the deal off

Count the occurrence of each unique word in the file

Pre-mixing cryogenic fuels and using only one fuel tank



Dative vs Accusative


Welchen Fall verwendet man mit Präposition “ohne”?Which one is correct: “dir” or “dich”? Dative or Accusative?How are accusative and dative combined in one sentence?When to use dative or accusative object with “sitzen”?Dative or accusative object comes first?“dich” in “Ich glaube (an) dich” — accusative or dative?Dative and Accusative ConfusionAccusative or dative case, how to detect “action” and “movement”?Accusative vs Dative: “Schau in der/die Schublade!”The order of dative and accusative in a sentenceDative or Accusative first?













7















I was doing some dative preposition exercises to familiarize myself with how they use it in german. I came across this sentence




Ich spreche mit meinem Bruder




Why is it "mit meinem" and not "mit meinen"? Ain't I speaking directly to my brother?



PS : Just started learning not too long ago.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Mun Wai is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • So some preposition will always follow either dative or accusation?

    – Mun Wai
    yesterday






  • 1





    @MunWai Exactly. "mit" is easy to learn. But, for example, why "think about X" means "denken an + Dativ", probably no one can say.

    – peterh
    yesterday






  • 4





    »Denken an« takes Akkusativ!

    – Raketenolli
    yesterday






  • 6





    "speaking directly to my brother" I think I know what the problem is. I bet someone told you about direct and indirect objects. Please forget this concept! It is misleading. It helps only in 90% of all sentences and is wrong in 10%. In German grammar the terms "direktes Objekt" and "indirektes Objekt" doesn't exists. Take any German grammar book and search for those terms: You won't find them. German has dative object, accusative objects, genitive objects, prepositional objects, and some also use the term "nominative object", but there is no direct object. Please forget it and ignore it.

    – Hubert Schölnast
    yesterday






  • 1





    @Raketenolli Well, "Denken an" can take the dative if the thinker was standing on top of the brother...

    – RedSonja
    yesterday















7















I was doing some dative preposition exercises to familiarize myself with how they use it in german. I came across this sentence




Ich spreche mit meinem Bruder




Why is it "mit meinem" and not "mit meinen"? Ain't I speaking directly to my brother?



PS : Just started learning not too long ago.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Mun Wai is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • So some preposition will always follow either dative or accusation?

    – Mun Wai
    yesterday






  • 1





    @MunWai Exactly. "mit" is easy to learn. But, for example, why "think about X" means "denken an + Dativ", probably no one can say.

    – peterh
    yesterday






  • 4





    »Denken an« takes Akkusativ!

    – Raketenolli
    yesterday






  • 6





    "speaking directly to my brother" I think I know what the problem is. I bet someone told you about direct and indirect objects. Please forget this concept! It is misleading. It helps only in 90% of all sentences and is wrong in 10%. In German grammar the terms "direktes Objekt" and "indirektes Objekt" doesn't exists. Take any German grammar book and search for those terms: You won't find them. German has dative object, accusative objects, genitive objects, prepositional objects, and some also use the term "nominative object", but there is no direct object. Please forget it and ignore it.

    – Hubert Schölnast
    yesterday






  • 1





    @Raketenolli Well, "Denken an" can take the dative if the thinker was standing on top of the brother...

    – RedSonja
    yesterday













7












7








7








I was doing some dative preposition exercises to familiarize myself with how they use it in german. I came across this sentence




Ich spreche mit meinem Bruder




Why is it "mit meinem" and not "mit meinen"? Ain't I speaking directly to my brother?



PS : Just started learning not too long ago.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Mun Wai is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I was doing some dative preposition exercises to familiarize myself with how they use it in german. I came across this sentence




Ich spreche mit meinem Bruder




Why is it "mit meinem" and not "mit meinen"? Ain't I speaking directly to my brother?



PS : Just started learning not too long ago.







dative






share|improve this question









New contributor




Mun Wai is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Mun Wai is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









IQV

10.3k2947




10.3k2947






New contributor




Mun Wai is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Mun WaiMun Wai

383




383




New contributor




Mun Wai is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Mun Wai is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Mun Wai is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • So some preposition will always follow either dative or accusation?

    – Mun Wai
    yesterday






  • 1





    @MunWai Exactly. "mit" is easy to learn. But, for example, why "think about X" means "denken an + Dativ", probably no one can say.

    – peterh
    yesterday






  • 4





    »Denken an« takes Akkusativ!

    – Raketenolli
    yesterday






  • 6





    "speaking directly to my brother" I think I know what the problem is. I bet someone told you about direct and indirect objects. Please forget this concept! It is misleading. It helps only in 90% of all sentences and is wrong in 10%. In German grammar the terms "direktes Objekt" and "indirektes Objekt" doesn't exists. Take any German grammar book and search for those terms: You won't find them. German has dative object, accusative objects, genitive objects, prepositional objects, and some also use the term "nominative object", but there is no direct object. Please forget it and ignore it.

    – Hubert Schölnast
    yesterday






  • 1





    @Raketenolli Well, "Denken an" can take the dative if the thinker was standing on top of the brother...

    – RedSonja
    yesterday

















  • So some preposition will always follow either dative or accusation?

    – Mun Wai
    yesterday






  • 1





    @MunWai Exactly. "mit" is easy to learn. But, for example, why "think about X" means "denken an + Dativ", probably no one can say.

    – peterh
    yesterday






  • 4





    »Denken an« takes Akkusativ!

    – Raketenolli
    yesterday






  • 6





    "speaking directly to my brother" I think I know what the problem is. I bet someone told you about direct and indirect objects. Please forget this concept! It is misleading. It helps only in 90% of all sentences and is wrong in 10%. In German grammar the terms "direktes Objekt" and "indirektes Objekt" doesn't exists. Take any German grammar book and search for those terms: You won't find them. German has dative object, accusative objects, genitive objects, prepositional objects, and some also use the term "nominative object", but there is no direct object. Please forget it and ignore it.

    – Hubert Schölnast
    yesterday






  • 1





    @Raketenolli Well, "Denken an" can take the dative if the thinker was standing on top of the brother...

    – RedSonja
    yesterday
















So some preposition will always follow either dative or accusation?

– Mun Wai
yesterday





So some preposition will always follow either dative or accusation?

– Mun Wai
yesterday




1




1





@MunWai Exactly. "mit" is easy to learn. But, for example, why "think about X" means "denken an + Dativ", probably no one can say.

– peterh
yesterday





@MunWai Exactly. "mit" is easy to learn. But, for example, why "think about X" means "denken an + Dativ", probably no one can say.

– peterh
yesterday




4




4





»Denken an« takes Akkusativ!

– Raketenolli
yesterday





»Denken an« takes Akkusativ!

– Raketenolli
yesterday




6




6





"speaking directly to my brother" I think I know what the problem is. I bet someone told you about direct and indirect objects. Please forget this concept! It is misleading. It helps only in 90% of all sentences and is wrong in 10%. In German grammar the terms "direktes Objekt" and "indirektes Objekt" doesn't exists. Take any German grammar book and search for those terms: You won't find them. German has dative object, accusative objects, genitive objects, prepositional objects, and some also use the term "nominative object", but there is no direct object. Please forget it and ignore it.

– Hubert Schölnast
yesterday





"speaking directly to my brother" I think I know what the problem is. I bet someone told you about direct and indirect objects. Please forget this concept! It is misleading. It helps only in 90% of all sentences and is wrong in 10%. In German grammar the terms "direktes Objekt" and "indirektes Objekt" doesn't exists. Take any German grammar book and search for those terms: You won't find them. German has dative object, accusative objects, genitive objects, prepositional objects, and some also use the term "nominative object", but there is no direct object. Please forget it and ignore it.

– Hubert Schölnast
yesterday




1




1





@Raketenolli Well, "Denken an" can take the dative if the thinker was standing on top of the brother...

– RedSonja
yesterday





@Raketenolli Well, "Denken an" can take the dative if the thinker was standing on top of the brother...

– RedSonja
yesterday










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















13














The components of this sentence are:



  • ich

    subject

    personal pronoun, first person, singular, nominative case


  • spreche

    predicate

    verb (a form of "sprechen"), first person, singular, present tense


  • mit meinem Bruder

    prepositional object



The verb sprechen (to speak, to talk) can have these kinds of objects:




  • accusative object
    What are you speaking? (What is coming out of your mouth when you are speaking?) (Rare: Who are you speaking?)




    Ich spreche deine Sprache. (I speak your language.)

    Ich spreche nur den ersten Satz. (I speak only the first sentence.)

    Ich spreche meinen Bruder.




    The last sentence is rare and can have two meanings:



    1. I will meet my brother and will have a conversation with him. You use this version often with an additional temporal adverb (»Morgen spreche ich meinen Bruder und da werden wir dann die weitere Vorgehensweise klären.« = Tomorrow I will meet my brother and then we will clarify the further course of action.) (This example also shows, that German Präsens can be future tense in English.)

    2. There is an audio drama about my brother, and in this drama I am speaking the role of my brother.



  • prepositional object with "über"
    About who or what are you speaking? (What is the topic of the conversation?)




    Ich spreche über das Wetter. (I talk about the weather.)

    Ich spreche über das Auto. (I talk about the car.)

    Ich spreche über meinen Bruder. (I talk about my brother.)





  • prepositional object with "mit"
    With whom are you talking? (Who is the other participant of the conversation?)




    Ich spreche mit dem Lehrer. (I talk with the teacher.)

    Ich spreche mit der Chefin. (I talk with the boss.)

    Ich spreche mit meinem Bruder. (I talk with my brother.)




Note, that there are also prepositional objects with other predicates and that you also can have more of them in a sentence, like in this example (I put each prepositional object in square brackets):
»Der König spricht [während des Festes] [dank der neuen Technik] [durch ein Megaphon] [zu seinem Volk].« = The king speaks [during the festival] [thanks to the new technique] [through a megaphone] [to his people].




Prepositional objects consists of two parts. The first part is the preposition, and this preposition dictates the grammatical case of the second part:




  • mit (with)

    always needs dative case


    Ich tanze mit meiner Tante (I dance with my aunt.)

    Er hat sie mit einem scharfen Messer erstochen. (He stabbed her with a sharp knife.)

    Er übt mit großer Leidenschaft. (He practices with great passion.)





These are some frequently used prepositions that always need dative:




aus, bei, mit, nach, seit




But there are also prepositions that always need accusative:




durch, für, gegen, ohne, um




Lots of prepositios need genitive case:




dank, trotz, fern, nördlich, während




And there are also prepositions which can go with dative or accusative, depending on the meaning:




auf, in, über, vor, zwischen




(Non of the lists is complete.)






share|improve this answer

























  • I remember in first classes some sports activity to learn the prepositions for dative with a box and thus your list of prepositions would be dative only - as this site suggests I'm wrong :-o learn-german-smarter.com/learn-german-prepositions - so the location meanings goes to dative

    – Shegit Brahm
    yesterday











  • Just read through, thank you for the informative answer! It was of big help!

    – Mun Wai
    yesterday






  • 1





    @Shegit Brahm: No. Only for the nine dual-way prepositions dative means location while accusative means direction. For all other prepositions, it's arbitrary.

    – Janka
    yesterday











  • Nice list! The fact that "mit" und "ohne" ("with" and "without") require different grammatical cases can be confusing even for native speakers.

    – Heinzi
    yesterday











  • Just a note that the list of prepositions is not complete (von, gegen, auf ...).

    – Peter A. Schneider
    yesterday











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "253"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Mun Wai is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgerman.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f50248%2fdative-vs-accusative%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









13














The components of this sentence are:



  • ich

    subject

    personal pronoun, first person, singular, nominative case


  • spreche

    predicate

    verb (a form of "sprechen"), first person, singular, present tense


  • mit meinem Bruder

    prepositional object



The verb sprechen (to speak, to talk) can have these kinds of objects:




  • accusative object
    What are you speaking? (What is coming out of your mouth when you are speaking?) (Rare: Who are you speaking?)




    Ich spreche deine Sprache. (I speak your language.)

    Ich spreche nur den ersten Satz. (I speak only the first sentence.)

    Ich spreche meinen Bruder.




    The last sentence is rare and can have two meanings:



    1. I will meet my brother and will have a conversation with him. You use this version often with an additional temporal adverb (»Morgen spreche ich meinen Bruder und da werden wir dann die weitere Vorgehensweise klären.« = Tomorrow I will meet my brother and then we will clarify the further course of action.) (This example also shows, that German Präsens can be future tense in English.)

    2. There is an audio drama about my brother, and in this drama I am speaking the role of my brother.



  • prepositional object with "über"
    About who or what are you speaking? (What is the topic of the conversation?)




    Ich spreche über das Wetter. (I talk about the weather.)

    Ich spreche über das Auto. (I talk about the car.)

    Ich spreche über meinen Bruder. (I talk about my brother.)





  • prepositional object with "mit"
    With whom are you talking? (Who is the other participant of the conversation?)




    Ich spreche mit dem Lehrer. (I talk with the teacher.)

    Ich spreche mit der Chefin. (I talk with the boss.)

    Ich spreche mit meinem Bruder. (I talk with my brother.)




Note, that there are also prepositional objects with other predicates and that you also can have more of them in a sentence, like in this example (I put each prepositional object in square brackets):
»Der König spricht [während des Festes] [dank der neuen Technik] [durch ein Megaphon] [zu seinem Volk].« = The king speaks [during the festival] [thanks to the new technique] [through a megaphone] [to his people].




Prepositional objects consists of two parts. The first part is the preposition, and this preposition dictates the grammatical case of the second part:




  • mit (with)

    always needs dative case


    Ich tanze mit meiner Tante (I dance with my aunt.)

    Er hat sie mit einem scharfen Messer erstochen. (He stabbed her with a sharp knife.)

    Er übt mit großer Leidenschaft. (He practices with great passion.)





These are some frequently used prepositions that always need dative:




aus, bei, mit, nach, seit




But there are also prepositions that always need accusative:




durch, für, gegen, ohne, um




Lots of prepositios need genitive case:




dank, trotz, fern, nördlich, während




And there are also prepositions which can go with dative or accusative, depending on the meaning:




auf, in, über, vor, zwischen




(Non of the lists is complete.)






share|improve this answer

























  • I remember in first classes some sports activity to learn the prepositions for dative with a box and thus your list of prepositions would be dative only - as this site suggests I'm wrong :-o learn-german-smarter.com/learn-german-prepositions - so the location meanings goes to dative

    – Shegit Brahm
    yesterday











  • Just read through, thank you for the informative answer! It was of big help!

    – Mun Wai
    yesterday






  • 1





    @Shegit Brahm: No. Only for the nine dual-way prepositions dative means location while accusative means direction. For all other prepositions, it's arbitrary.

    – Janka
    yesterday











  • Nice list! The fact that "mit" und "ohne" ("with" and "without") require different grammatical cases can be confusing even for native speakers.

    – Heinzi
    yesterday











  • Just a note that the list of prepositions is not complete (von, gegen, auf ...).

    – Peter A. Schneider
    yesterday
















13














The components of this sentence are:



  • ich

    subject

    personal pronoun, first person, singular, nominative case


  • spreche

    predicate

    verb (a form of "sprechen"), first person, singular, present tense


  • mit meinem Bruder

    prepositional object



The verb sprechen (to speak, to talk) can have these kinds of objects:




  • accusative object
    What are you speaking? (What is coming out of your mouth when you are speaking?) (Rare: Who are you speaking?)




    Ich spreche deine Sprache. (I speak your language.)

    Ich spreche nur den ersten Satz. (I speak only the first sentence.)

    Ich spreche meinen Bruder.




    The last sentence is rare and can have two meanings:



    1. I will meet my brother and will have a conversation with him. You use this version often with an additional temporal adverb (»Morgen spreche ich meinen Bruder und da werden wir dann die weitere Vorgehensweise klären.« = Tomorrow I will meet my brother and then we will clarify the further course of action.) (This example also shows, that German Präsens can be future tense in English.)

    2. There is an audio drama about my brother, and in this drama I am speaking the role of my brother.



  • prepositional object with "über"
    About who or what are you speaking? (What is the topic of the conversation?)




    Ich spreche über das Wetter. (I talk about the weather.)

    Ich spreche über das Auto. (I talk about the car.)

    Ich spreche über meinen Bruder. (I talk about my brother.)





  • prepositional object with "mit"
    With whom are you talking? (Who is the other participant of the conversation?)




    Ich spreche mit dem Lehrer. (I talk with the teacher.)

    Ich spreche mit der Chefin. (I talk with the boss.)

    Ich spreche mit meinem Bruder. (I talk with my brother.)




Note, that there are also prepositional objects with other predicates and that you also can have more of them in a sentence, like in this example (I put each prepositional object in square brackets):
»Der König spricht [während des Festes] [dank der neuen Technik] [durch ein Megaphon] [zu seinem Volk].« = The king speaks [during the festival] [thanks to the new technique] [through a megaphone] [to his people].




Prepositional objects consists of two parts. The first part is the preposition, and this preposition dictates the grammatical case of the second part:




  • mit (with)

    always needs dative case


    Ich tanze mit meiner Tante (I dance with my aunt.)

    Er hat sie mit einem scharfen Messer erstochen. (He stabbed her with a sharp knife.)

    Er übt mit großer Leidenschaft. (He practices with great passion.)





These are some frequently used prepositions that always need dative:




aus, bei, mit, nach, seit




But there are also prepositions that always need accusative:




durch, für, gegen, ohne, um




Lots of prepositios need genitive case:




dank, trotz, fern, nördlich, während




And there are also prepositions which can go with dative or accusative, depending on the meaning:




auf, in, über, vor, zwischen




(Non of the lists is complete.)






share|improve this answer

























  • I remember in first classes some sports activity to learn the prepositions for dative with a box and thus your list of prepositions would be dative only - as this site suggests I'm wrong :-o learn-german-smarter.com/learn-german-prepositions - so the location meanings goes to dative

    – Shegit Brahm
    yesterday











  • Just read through, thank you for the informative answer! It was of big help!

    – Mun Wai
    yesterday






  • 1





    @Shegit Brahm: No. Only for the nine dual-way prepositions dative means location while accusative means direction. For all other prepositions, it's arbitrary.

    – Janka
    yesterday











  • Nice list! The fact that "mit" und "ohne" ("with" and "without") require different grammatical cases can be confusing even for native speakers.

    – Heinzi
    yesterday











  • Just a note that the list of prepositions is not complete (von, gegen, auf ...).

    – Peter A. Schneider
    yesterday














13












13








13







The components of this sentence are:



  • ich

    subject

    personal pronoun, first person, singular, nominative case


  • spreche

    predicate

    verb (a form of "sprechen"), first person, singular, present tense


  • mit meinem Bruder

    prepositional object



The verb sprechen (to speak, to talk) can have these kinds of objects:




  • accusative object
    What are you speaking? (What is coming out of your mouth when you are speaking?) (Rare: Who are you speaking?)




    Ich spreche deine Sprache. (I speak your language.)

    Ich spreche nur den ersten Satz. (I speak only the first sentence.)

    Ich spreche meinen Bruder.




    The last sentence is rare and can have two meanings:



    1. I will meet my brother and will have a conversation with him. You use this version often with an additional temporal adverb (»Morgen spreche ich meinen Bruder und da werden wir dann die weitere Vorgehensweise klären.« = Tomorrow I will meet my brother and then we will clarify the further course of action.) (This example also shows, that German Präsens can be future tense in English.)

    2. There is an audio drama about my brother, and in this drama I am speaking the role of my brother.



  • prepositional object with "über"
    About who or what are you speaking? (What is the topic of the conversation?)




    Ich spreche über das Wetter. (I talk about the weather.)

    Ich spreche über das Auto. (I talk about the car.)

    Ich spreche über meinen Bruder. (I talk about my brother.)





  • prepositional object with "mit"
    With whom are you talking? (Who is the other participant of the conversation?)




    Ich spreche mit dem Lehrer. (I talk with the teacher.)

    Ich spreche mit der Chefin. (I talk with the boss.)

    Ich spreche mit meinem Bruder. (I talk with my brother.)




Note, that there are also prepositional objects with other predicates and that you also can have more of them in a sentence, like in this example (I put each prepositional object in square brackets):
»Der König spricht [während des Festes] [dank der neuen Technik] [durch ein Megaphon] [zu seinem Volk].« = The king speaks [during the festival] [thanks to the new technique] [through a megaphone] [to his people].




Prepositional objects consists of two parts. The first part is the preposition, and this preposition dictates the grammatical case of the second part:




  • mit (with)

    always needs dative case


    Ich tanze mit meiner Tante (I dance with my aunt.)

    Er hat sie mit einem scharfen Messer erstochen. (He stabbed her with a sharp knife.)

    Er übt mit großer Leidenschaft. (He practices with great passion.)





These are some frequently used prepositions that always need dative:




aus, bei, mit, nach, seit




But there are also prepositions that always need accusative:




durch, für, gegen, ohne, um




Lots of prepositios need genitive case:




dank, trotz, fern, nördlich, während




And there are also prepositions which can go with dative or accusative, depending on the meaning:




auf, in, über, vor, zwischen




(Non of the lists is complete.)






share|improve this answer















The components of this sentence are:



  • ich

    subject

    personal pronoun, first person, singular, nominative case


  • spreche

    predicate

    verb (a form of "sprechen"), first person, singular, present tense


  • mit meinem Bruder

    prepositional object



The verb sprechen (to speak, to talk) can have these kinds of objects:




  • accusative object
    What are you speaking? (What is coming out of your mouth when you are speaking?) (Rare: Who are you speaking?)




    Ich spreche deine Sprache. (I speak your language.)

    Ich spreche nur den ersten Satz. (I speak only the first sentence.)

    Ich spreche meinen Bruder.




    The last sentence is rare and can have two meanings:



    1. I will meet my brother and will have a conversation with him. You use this version often with an additional temporal adverb (»Morgen spreche ich meinen Bruder und da werden wir dann die weitere Vorgehensweise klären.« = Tomorrow I will meet my brother and then we will clarify the further course of action.) (This example also shows, that German Präsens can be future tense in English.)

    2. There is an audio drama about my brother, and in this drama I am speaking the role of my brother.



  • prepositional object with "über"
    About who or what are you speaking? (What is the topic of the conversation?)




    Ich spreche über das Wetter. (I talk about the weather.)

    Ich spreche über das Auto. (I talk about the car.)

    Ich spreche über meinen Bruder. (I talk about my brother.)





  • prepositional object with "mit"
    With whom are you talking? (Who is the other participant of the conversation?)




    Ich spreche mit dem Lehrer. (I talk with the teacher.)

    Ich spreche mit der Chefin. (I talk with the boss.)

    Ich spreche mit meinem Bruder. (I talk with my brother.)




Note, that there are also prepositional objects with other predicates and that you also can have more of them in a sentence, like in this example (I put each prepositional object in square brackets):
»Der König spricht [während des Festes] [dank der neuen Technik] [durch ein Megaphon] [zu seinem Volk].« = The king speaks [during the festival] [thanks to the new technique] [through a megaphone] [to his people].




Prepositional objects consists of two parts. The first part is the preposition, and this preposition dictates the grammatical case of the second part:




  • mit (with)

    always needs dative case


    Ich tanze mit meiner Tante (I dance with my aunt.)

    Er hat sie mit einem scharfen Messer erstochen. (He stabbed her with a sharp knife.)

    Er übt mit großer Leidenschaft. (He practices with great passion.)





These are some frequently used prepositions that always need dative:




aus, bei, mit, nach, seit




But there are also prepositions that always need accusative:




durch, für, gegen, ohne, um




Lots of prepositios need genitive case:




dank, trotz, fern, nördlich, während




And there are also prepositions which can go with dative or accusative, depending on the meaning:




auf, in, über, vor, zwischen




(Non of the lists is complete.)







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited yesterday

























answered yesterday









Hubert SchölnastHubert Schölnast

73.1k6109243




73.1k6109243












  • I remember in first classes some sports activity to learn the prepositions for dative with a box and thus your list of prepositions would be dative only - as this site suggests I'm wrong :-o learn-german-smarter.com/learn-german-prepositions - so the location meanings goes to dative

    – Shegit Brahm
    yesterday











  • Just read through, thank you for the informative answer! It was of big help!

    – Mun Wai
    yesterday






  • 1





    @Shegit Brahm: No. Only for the nine dual-way prepositions dative means location while accusative means direction. For all other prepositions, it's arbitrary.

    – Janka
    yesterday











  • Nice list! The fact that "mit" und "ohne" ("with" and "without") require different grammatical cases can be confusing even for native speakers.

    – Heinzi
    yesterday











  • Just a note that the list of prepositions is not complete (von, gegen, auf ...).

    – Peter A. Schneider
    yesterday


















  • I remember in first classes some sports activity to learn the prepositions for dative with a box and thus your list of prepositions would be dative only - as this site suggests I'm wrong :-o learn-german-smarter.com/learn-german-prepositions - so the location meanings goes to dative

    – Shegit Brahm
    yesterday











  • Just read through, thank you for the informative answer! It was of big help!

    – Mun Wai
    yesterday






  • 1





    @Shegit Brahm: No. Only for the nine dual-way prepositions dative means location while accusative means direction. For all other prepositions, it's arbitrary.

    – Janka
    yesterday











  • Nice list! The fact that "mit" und "ohne" ("with" and "without") require different grammatical cases can be confusing even for native speakers.

    – Heinzi
    yesterday











  • Just a note that the list of prepositions is not complete (von, gegen, auf ...).

    – Peter A. Schneider
    yesterday

















I remember in first classes some sports activity to learn the prepositions for dative with a box and thus your list of prepositions would be dative only - as this site suggests I'm wrong :-o learn-german-smarter.com/learn-german-prepositions - so the location meanings goes to dative

– Shegit Brahm
yesterday





I remember in first classes some sports activity to learn the prepositions for dative with a box and thus your list of prepositions would be dative only - as this site suggests I'm wrong :-o learn-german-smarter.com/learn-german-prepositions - so the location meanings goes to dative

– Shegit Brahm
yesterday













Just read through, thank you for the informative answer! It was of big help!

– Mun Wai
yesterday





Just read through, thank you for the informative answer! It was of big help!

– Mun Wai
yesterday




1




1





@Shegit Brahm: No. Only for the nine dual-way prepositions dative means location while accusative means direction. For all other prepositions, it's arbitrary.

– Janka
yesterday





@Shegit Brahm: No. Only for the nine dual-way prepositions dative means location while accusative means direction. For all other prepositions, it's arbitrary.

– Janka
yesterday













Nice list! The fact that "mit" und "ohne" ("with" and "without") require different grammatical cases can be confusing even for native speakers.

– Heinzi
yesterday





Nice list! The fact that "mit" und "ohne" ("with" and "without") require different grammatical cases can be confusing even for native speakers.

– Heinzi
yesterday













Just a note that the list of prepositions is not complete (von, gegen, auf ...).

– Peter A. Schneider
yesterday






Just a note that the list of prepositions is not complete (von, gegen, auf ...).

– Peter A. Schneider
yesterday











Mun Wai is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















Mun Wai is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Mun Wai is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Mun Wai is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to German Language Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgerman.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f50248%2fdative-vs-accusative%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Sum ergo cogito? 1 nng

419 nièngy_Soadمي 19bal1.5o_g

Queiggey Chernihivv 9NnOo i Zw X QqKk LpB