Single author papers against my advisor's will? Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Deciding between different PhD programsHow do you decide when you have enough research results to write a paper and to which journal you submit the paperAre there pre-doc positions in TCS?How can I use my computational theory and analysis powers for the greater good?Which areas of TCS are better for a math bachelor?How to find interesting research problemsWhat is the difference between a TCS PhD thesis and Computer Science experimental PhD thesis?Importance of single author papers?Writing a paper as a single author in 1st person singularHow to be more “theory-minded”?

Identifying polygons that intersect with another layer using QGIS?

The logistics of corpse disposal

Is pollution the main cause of Notre Dame Cathedral's deterioration?

How to tell that you are a giant?

Identify plant with long narrow paired leaves and reddish stems

Simplicity of the roots of a minimal polynomial

How discoverable are IPv6 addresses and AAAA names by potential attackers?

Apollo command module space walk?

illegal generic type for instanceof when using local classes

What does this icon in iOS Stardew Valley mean?

Should I use a zero-interest credit card for a large one-time purchase?

What exactly is a "Meth" in Altered Carbon?

Why are Kinder Surprise Eggs illegal in the USA?

Fundamental Solution of the Pell Equation

What is Arya's weapon design?

Is it true that "carbohydrates are of no use for the basal metabolic need"?

What causes the vertical darker bands in my photo?

At the end of Thor: Ragnarok why don't the Asgardians turn and head for the Bifrost as per their original plan?

What's the meaning of 間時肆拾貳 at a car parking sign

Do I really need recursive chmod to restrict access to a folder?

Should I discuss the type of campaign with my players?

Output the ŋarâþ crîþ alphabet song without using (m)any letters

Why is "Consequences inflicted." not a sentence?

Using et al. for a last / senior author rather than for a first author



Single author papers against my advisor's will?



Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Deciding between different PhD programsHow do you decide when you have enough research results to write a paper and to which journal you submit the paperAre there pre-doc positions in TCS?How can I use my computational theory and analysis powers for the greater good?Which areas of TCS are better for a math bachelor?How to find interesting research problemsWhat is the difference between a TCS PhD thesis and Computer Science experimental PhD thesis?Importance of single author papers?Writing a paper as a single author in 1st person singularHow to be more “theory-minded”?










28












$begingroup$


I am a third year PhD student in an area of theoretical CS that would like advice for a difficult situation with my advisor.



My advisor is not involved in my research projects at all. In particular, I have come up with all of my paper ideas, and have executed the papers alone. However, she always insists on adding her name as a co-author. This has started to increasingly bother me, as I work very hard (alone) on my research and believe I should get credit for that. In addition, she is a bully and treats me quite badly, so it makes it even harder for me to benefit her in this way.



For my most recent paper, I brought up how I didn't believe she was meeting the IEEE 1 or ACM 2 guidelines for authorship, and told her that I believed I should be sole author on my paper. She agreed that she shouldn't be an author, although she was visibly angry. She said that I was a "weirdo" for doing this, and said that everybody already knows that advisors take credit for their student's work and that publishing with your advisor is the same as publishing alone. But most importantly, she told me that she would not approve my proposal/dissertation if I did not add her name to several more top-tier papers because then I "have no ties to the university" since I am not working with a professor, and therefore cannot receive my PhD.



Obviously, I need a new advisor. However, there is really no one in my department in my research area. Switching research areas or departments are not options. So the remaining options are the following:



(1) Add her name to several more papers. I do not like this idea because it is unethical, and there is no guarantee that anything is even gained in this option. She could simply refuse to recommend me in the end after I got her a bunch of papers.



(2) Ignore her threats, and force my way to finishing my PhD while publishing single author papers. I do not believe she could stop me from graduating since I already have a decent publication record, and presumably will continue getting my work out. I have a fellowship, so she can't control my funding. Clearly, I will not have a letter of recommendation in this case. On the other hand, I will have a bunch of single author papers.



(3) Try to convince a professor in an unrelated research area to be my advisor, emphasizing that I am independent and can do my work alone. There are a few theory professors in my dept, although they are totally different areas. I have no idea the chance of this working out.



(4) Go to the department chair and tell him the whole story, ask what to do.



What do you think I should do?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




anonymous3724 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 31




    $begingroup$
    I think this question would be a better fit for academia.stackexchange.com .
    $endgroup$
    – Emil Jeřábek
    Apr 12 at 6:39






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Threats like "would not approve my proposal/dissertation if I did not add her name to several more top-tier papers" are unacceptable. Since you have your own funding, you should move supervisors. Supervisors have two core roles: provide funding (if needed), and provide technical help (if needed). Both don't apply in your case. Hence, there is no particular problem with changing supervisors, especially with a 3rd year PhD who's capable of researching and publishing independently. (This is deal for a supervisor, no need to babysit the student, no worries about graduating.)
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Berger
    Apr 12 at 8:56






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If the fellowship is not tied to a specific university, you could even change universities.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Berger
    Apr 12 at 8:57






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Since your supervisor threatens you, she's probably gotten away with this in the past and might do so in the future. So to be on the safe side, "just in case", I'd document your supervisor's lack of help. Write your paperers using e.g. GitHub, and commit your progress frequently, like several times per hour. This way there is an official, independently verifiable, trail of who wrote what in your papers. In addition, meticulously document your supervision sessions, document what you did, what the supervisor should have done, what the supervisor didn't do. Document any threats.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Berger
    Apr 12 at 8:58






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    "everybody already knows that advisors take credit for their student's work and that publishing with your advisor is the same as publishing alone." That's a plain lie from your advisor. Most advisors are helpful and provide important support for coming up with the results of a paper, even when they do not participate to the writeup. In fact, my own advisor had even encouraged me to publish papers without him before finishing my PhD, to make it clear that I'm able to work by myself and that I'm not just being carried by his (great) guidance.
    $endgroup$
    – Geoffroy Couteau
    Apr 12 at 10:20















28












$begingroup$


I am a third year PhD student in an area of theoretical CS that would like advice for a difficult situation with my advisor.



My advisor is not involved in my research projects at all. In particular, I have come up with all of my paper ideas, and have executed the papers alone. However, she always insists on adding her name as a co-author. This has started to increasingly bother me, as I work very hard (alone) on my research and believe I should get credit for that. In addition, she is a bully and treats me quite badly, so it makes it even harder for me to benefit her in this way.



For my most recent paper, I brought up how I didn't believe she was meeting the IEEE 1 or ACM 2 guidelines for authorship, and told her that I believed I should be sole author on my paper. She agreed that she shouldn't be an author, although she was visibly angry. She said that I was a "weirdo" for doing this, and said that everybody already knows that advisors take credit for their student's work and that publishing with your advisor is the same as publishing alone. But most importantly, she told me that she would not approve my proposal/dissertation if I did not add her name to several more top-tier papers because then I "have no ties to the university" since I am not working with a professor, and therefore cannot receive my PhD.



Obviously, I need a new advisor. However, there is really no one in my department in my research area. Switching research areas or departments are not options. So the remaining options are the following:



(1) Add her name to several more papers. I do not like this idea because it is unethical, and there is no guarantee that anything is even gained in this option. She could simply refuse to recommend me in the end after I got her a bunch of papers.



(2) Ignore her threats, and force my way to finishing my PhD while publishing single author papers. I do not believe she could stop me from graduating since I already have a decent publication record, and presumably will continue getting my work out. I have a fellowship, so she can't control my funding. Clearly, I will not have a letter of recommendation in this case. On the other hand, I will have a bunch of single author papers.



(3) Try to convince a professor in an unrelated research area to be my advisor, emphasizing that I am independent and can do my work alone. There are a few theory professors in my dept, although they are totally different areas. I have no idea the chance of this working out.



(4) Go to the department chair and tell him the whole story, ask what to do.



What do you think I should do?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




anonymous3724 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 31




    $begingroup$
    I think this question would be a better fit for academia.stackexchange.com .
    $endgroup$
    – Emil Jeřábek
    Apr 12 at 6:39






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Threats like "would not approve my proposal/dissertation if I did not add her name to several more top-tier papers" are unacceptable. Since you have your own funding, you should move supervisors. Supervisors have two core roles: provide funding (if needed), and provide technical help (if needed). Both don't apply in your case. Hence, there is no particular problem with changing supervisors, especially with a 3rd year PhD who's capable of researching and publishing independently. (This is deal for a supervisor, no need to babysit the student, no worries about graduating.)
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Berger
    Apr 12 at 8:56






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If the fellowship is not tied to a specific university, you could even change universities.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Berger
    Apr 12 at 8:57






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Since your supervisor threatens you, she's probably gotten away with this in the past and might do so in the future. So to be on the safe side, "just in case", I'd document your supervisor's lack of help. Write your paperers using e.g. GitHub, and commit your progress frequently, like several times per hour. This way there is an official, independently verifiable, trail of who wrote what in your papers. In addition, meticulously document your supervision sessions, document what you did, what the supervisor should have done, what the supervisor didn't do. Document any threats.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Berger
    Apr 12 at 8:58






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    "everybody already knows that advisors take credit for their student's work and that publishing with your advisor is the same as publishing alone." That's a plain lie from your advisor. Most advisors are helpful and provide important support for coming up with the results of a paper, even when they do not participate to the writeup. In fact, my own advisor had even encouraged me to publish papers without him before finishing my PhD, to make it clear that I'm able to work by myself and that I'm not just being carried by his (great) guidance.
    $endgroup$
    – Geoffroy Couteau
    Apr 12 at 10:20













28












28








28


3



$begingroup$


I am a third year PhD student in an area of theoretical CS that would like advice for a difficult situation with my advisor.



My advisor is not involved in my research projects at all. In particular, I have come up with all of my paper ideas, and have executed the papers alone. However, she always insists on adding her name as a co-author. This has started to increasingly bother me, as I work very hard (alone) on my research and believe I should get credit for that. In addition, she is a bully and treats me quite badly, so it makes it even harder for me to benefit her in this way.



For my most recent paper, I brought up how I didn't believe she was meeting the IEEE 1 or ACM 2 guidelines for authorship, and told her that I believed I should be sole author on my paper. She agreed that she shouldn't be an author, although she was visibly angry. She said that I was a "weirdo" for doing this, and said that everybody already knows that advisors take credit for their student's work and that publishing with your advisor is the same as publishing alone. But most importantly, she told me that she would not approve my proposal/dissertation if I did not add her name to several more top-tier papers because then I "have no ties to the university" since I am not working with a professor, and therefore cannot receive my PhD.



Obviously, I need a new advisor. However, there is really no one in my department in my research area. Switching research areas or departments are not options. So the remaining options are the following:



(1) Add her name to several more papers. I do not like this idea because it is unethical, and there is no guarantee that anything is even gained in this option. She could simply refuse to recommend me in the end after I got her a bunch of papers.



(2) Ignore her threats, and force my way to finishing my PhD while publishing single author papers. I do not believe she could stop me from graduating since I already have a decent publication record, and presumably will continue getting my work out. I have a fellowship, so she can't control my funding. Clearly, I will not have a letter of recommendation in this case. On the other hand, I will have a bunch of single author papers.



(3) Try to convince a professor in an unrelated research area to be my advisor, emphasizing that I am independent and can do my work alone. There are a few theory professors in my dept, although they are totally different areas. I have no idea the chance of this working out.



(4) Go to the department chair and tell him the whole story, ask what to do.



What do you think I should do?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




anonymous3724 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I am a third year PhD student in an area of theoretical CS that would like advice for a difficult situation with my advisor.



My advisor is not involved in my research projects at all. In particular, I have come up with all of my paper ideas, and have executed the papers alone. However, she always insists on adding her name as a co-author. This has started to increasingly bother me, as I work very hard (alone) on my research and believe I should get credit for that. In addition, she is a bully and treats me quite badly, so it makes it even harder for me to benefit her in this way.



For my most recent paper, I brought up how I didn't believe she was meeting the IEEE 1 or ACM 2 guidelines for authorship, and told her that I believed I should be sole author on my paper. She agreed that she shouldn't be an author, although she was visibly angry. She said that I was a "weirdo" for doing this, and said that everybody already knows that advisors take credit for their student's work and that publishing with your advisor is the same as publishing alone. But most importantly, she told me that she would not approve my proposal/dissertation if I did not add her name to several more top-tier papers because then I "have no ties to the university" since I am not working with a professor, and therefore cannot receive my PhD.



Obviously, I need a new advisor. However, there is really no one in my department in my research area. Switching research areas or departments are not options. So the remaining options are the following:



(1) Add her name to several more papers. I do not like this idea because it is unethical, and there is no guarantee that anything is even gained in this option. She could simply refuse to recommend me in the end after I got her a bunch of papers.



(2) Ignore her threats, and force my way to finishing my PhD while publishing single author papers. I do not believe she could stop me from graduating since I already have a decent publication record, and presumably will continue getting my work out. I have a fellowship, so she can't control my funding. Clearly, I will not have a letter of recommendation in this case. On the other hand, I will have a bunch of single author papers.



(3) Try to convince a professor in an unrelated research area to be my advisor, emphasizing that I am independent and can do my work alone. There are a few theory professors in my dept, although they are totally different areas. I have no idea the chance of this working out.



(4) Go to the department chair and tell him the whole story, ask what to do.



What do you think I should do?







soft-question advice-request






share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




anonymous3724 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




anonymous3724 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question






New contributor




anonymous3724 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Apr 12 at 1:14









anonymous3724anonymous3724

14423




14423




New contributor




anonymous3724 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





anonymous3724 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






anonymous3724 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 31




    $begingroup$
    I think this question would be a better fit for academia.stackexchange.com .
    $endgroup$
    – Emil Jeřábek
    Apr 12 at 6:39






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Threats like "would not approve my proposal/dissertation if I did not add her name to several more top-tier papers" are unacceptable. Since you have your own funding, you should move supervisors. Supervisors have two core roles: provide funding (if needed), and provide technical help (if needed). Both don't apply in your case. Hence, there is no particular problem with changing supervisors, especially with a 3rd year PhD who's capable of researching and publishing independently. (This is deal for a supervisor, no need to babysit the student, no worries about graduating.)
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Berger
    Apr 12 at 8:56






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If the fellowship is not tied to a specific university, you could even change universities.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Berger
    Apr 12 at 8:57






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Since your supervisor threatens you, she's probably gotten away with this in the past and might do so in the future. So to be on the safe side, "just in case", I'd document your supervisor's lack of help. Write your paperers using e.g. GitHub, and commit your progress frequently, like several times per hour. This way there is an official, independently verifiable, trail of who wrote what in your papers. In addition, meticulously document your supervision sessions, document what you did, what the supervisor should have done, what the supervisor didn't do. Document any threats.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Berger
    Apr 12 at 8:58






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    "everybody already knows that advisors take credit for their student's work and that publishing with your advisor is the same as publishing alone." That's a plain lie from your advisor. Most advisors are helpful and provide important support for coming up with the results of a paper, even when they do not participate to the writeup. In fact, my own advisor had even encouraged me to publish papers without him before finishing my PhD, to make it clear that I'm able to work by myself and that I'm not just being carried by his (great) guidance.
    $endgroup$
    – Geoffroy Couteau
    Apr 12 at 10:20












  • 31




    $begingroup$
    I think this question would be a better fit for academia.stackexchange.com .
    $endgroup$
    – Emil Jeřábek
    Apr 12 at 6:39






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Threats like "would not approve my proposal/dissertation if I did not add her name to several more top-tier papers" are unacceptable. Since you have your own funding, you should move supervisors. Supervisors have two core roles: provide funding (if needed), and provide technical help (if needed). Both don't apply in your case. Hence, there is no particular problem with changing supervisors, especially with a 3rd year PhD who's capable of researching and publishing independently. (This is deal for a supervisor, no need to babysit the student, no worries about graduating.)
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Berger
    Apr 12 at 8:56






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If the fellowship is not tied to a specific university, you could even change universities.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Berger
    Apr 12 at 8:57






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Since your supervisor threatens you, she's probably gotten away with this in the past and might do so in the future. So to be on the safe side, "just in case", I'd document your supervisor's lack of help. Write your paperers using e.g. GitHub, and commit your progress frequently, like several times per hour. This way there is an official, independently verifiable, trail of who wrote what in your papers. In addition, meticulously document your supervision sessions, document what you did, what the supervisor should have done, what the supervisor didn't do. Document any threats.
    $endgroup$
    – Martin Berger
    Apr 12 at 8:58






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    "everybody already knows that advisors take credit for their student's work and that publishing with your advisor is the same as publishing alone." That's a plain lie from your advisor. Most advisors are helpful and provide important support for coming up with the results of a paper, even when they do not participate to the writeup. In fact, my own advisor had even encouraged me to publish papers without him before finishing my PhD, to make it clear that I'm able to work by myself and that I'm not just being carried by his (great) guidance.
    $endgroup$
    – Geoffroy Couteau
    Apr 12 at 10:20







31




31




$begingroup$
I think this question would be a better fit for academia.stackexchange.com .
$endgroup$
– Emil Jeřábek
Apr 12 at 6:39




$begingroup$
I think this question would be a better fit for academia.stackexchange.com .
$endgroup$
– Emil Jeřábek
Apr 12 at 6:39




4




4




$begingroup$
Threats like "would not approve my proposal/dissertation if I did not add her name to several more top-tier papers" are unacceptable. Since you have your own funding, you should move supervisors. Supervisors have two core roles: provide funding (if needed), and provide technical help (if needed). Both don't apply in your case. Hence, there is no particular problem with changing supervisors, especially with a 3rd year PhD who's capable of researching and publishing independently. (This is deal for a supervisor, no need to babysit the student, no worries about graduating.)
$endgroup$
– Martin Berger
Apr 12 at 8:56




$begingroup$
Threats like "would not approve my proposal/dissertation if I did not add her name to several more top-tier papers" are unacceptable. Since you have your own funding, you should move supervisors. Supervisors have two core roles: provide funding (if needed), and provide technical help (if needed). Both don't apply in your case. Hence, there is no particular problem with changing supervisors, especially with a 3rd year PhD who's capable of researching and publishing independently. (This is deal for a supervisor, no need to babysit the student, no worries about graduating.)
$endgroup$
– Martin Berger
Apr 12 at 8:56




2




2




$begingroup$
If the fellowship is not tied to a specific university, you could even change universities.
$endgroup$
– Martin Berger
Apr 12 at 8:57




$begingroup$
If the fellowship is not tied to a specific university, you could even change universities.
$endgroup$
– Martin Berger
Apr 12 at 8:57




3




3




$begingroup$
Since your supervisor threatens you, she's probably gotten away with this in the past and might do so in the future. So to be on the safe side, "just in case", I'd document your supervisor's lack of help. Write your paperers using e.g. GitHub, and commit your progress frequently, like several times per hour. This way there is an official, independently verifiable, trail of who wrote what in your papers. In addition, meticulously document your supervision sessions, document what you did, what the supervisor should have done, what the supervisor didn't do. Document any threats.
$endgroup$
– Martin Berger
Apr 12 at 8:58




$begingroup$
Since your supervisor threatens you, she's probably gotten away with this in the past and might do so in the future. So to be on the safe side, "just in case", I'd document your supervisor's lack of help. Write your paperers using e.g. GitHub, and commit your progress frequently, like several times per hour. This way there is an official, independently verifiable, trail of who wrote what in your papers. In addition, meticulously document your supervision sessions, document what you did, what the supervisor should have done, what the supervisor didn't do. Document any threats.
$endgroup$
– Martin Berger
Apr 12 at 8:58




5




5




$begingroup$
"everybody already knows that advisors take credit for their student's work and that publishing with your advisor is the same as publishing alone." That's a plain lie from your advisor. Most advisors are helpful and provide important support for coming up with the results of a paper, even when they do not participate to the writeup. In fact, my own advisor had even encouraged me to publish papers without him before finishing my PhD, to make it clear that I'm able to work by myself and that I'm not just being carried by his (great) guidance.
$endgroup$
– Geoffroy Couteau
Apr 12 at 10:20




$begingroup$
"everybody already knows that advisors take credit for their student's work and that publishing with your advisor is the same as publishing alone." That's a plain lie from your advisor. Most advisors are helpful and provide important support for coming up with the results of a paper, even when they do not participate to the writeup. In fact, my own advisor had even encouraged me to publish papers without him before finishing my PhD, to make it clear that I'm able to work by myself and that I'm not just being carried by his (great) guidance.
$endgroup$
– Geoffroy Couteau
Apr 12 at 10:20










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















42












$begingroup$

As a department chair, I can say you aren't alone. These situations come up all too often.



Please do reach out to your department chair, graduate program director or grad student ombudsperson if your institution has one. We want to know when our faculty are behaving badly and often we can help.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    15












    $begingroup$

    You should switch advisors. Since you are independently writing papers and have a track record, it should be possible to find a fair-minded theory advisor in a different technical area who is willing to do the administrative aspects of handling a PhD thesis. Your department chair should also help in this matter.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      7












      $begingroup$

      Unfortunately, there is little you can do -- a PhD adviser exercises a great deal of control over the students' careers. I think at this point, you're better off placating her and adding her as a co-author. When you get your degree, avoid whenever possible requesting recommendation letters from her.



      A major piece of advice I offer all beginning graduate students (which is too late for you) is to ask around before choosing an adviser. Ask former and current students especially, but also faculty (delicately) -- to the degree they're willing to be honest with you. Faculty members rarely comment on each other, but in extreme cases they will (I've gotten pointers from faculty members to avoid certain people). Yours sounds like an extreme case, and I imagine you're not the only one who's experienced this adviser's unethical behavior. Do a service to the community -- if students ask about her, honestly share your experience!



      Also, consider speaking with your director of graduate studies, who will have more information and may be able to offer better advice.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$








      • 14




        $begingroup$
        I can't quite upvote this due to the recommendation of placating her by adding her as a coauthor. The fact that she's actually threatening to not sign off on the OP's dissertation unless she's given coauthor credit on unrelated papers is sufficiently unethical that there's an obligation to bring this to the attention of someone who can do something about it. But I strongly agree with every other part of this answer.
        $endgroup$
        – Ray
        Apr 12 at 17:21







      • 5




        $begingroup$
        I agree that my advice to placate the adviser is unfair, but I still think it's the most pragmatic suggestion, given how little I know about the specifics. My main concern is about the OP's academic future, which can be harmed by scandals -- especially if the adviser wields a lot of power around the department.
        $endgroup$
        – Aryeh
        Apr 13 at 19:29











      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "114"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      anonymous3724 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcstheory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f42704%2fsingle-author-papers-against-my-advisors-will%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      42












      $begingroup$

      As a department chair, I can say you aren't alone. These situations come up all too often.



      Please do reach out to your department chair, graduate program director or grad student ombudsperson if your institution has one. We want to know when our faculty are behaving badly and often we can help.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        42












        $begingroup$

        As a department chair, I can say you aren't alone. These situations come up all too often.



        Please do reach out to your department chair, graduate program director or grad student ombudsperson if your institution has one. We want to know when our faculty are behaving badly and often we can help.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          42












          42








          42





          $begingroup$

          As a department chair, I can say you aren't alone. These situations come up all too often.



          Please do reach out to your department chair, graduate program director or grad student ombudsperson if your institution has one. We want to know when our faculty are behaving badly and often we can help.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          As a department chair, I can say you aren't alone. These situations come up all too often.



          Please do reach out to your department chair, graduate program director or grad student ombudsperson if your institution has one. We want to know when our faculty are behaving badly and often we can help.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Apr 12 at 12:53









          Lance FortnowLance Fortnow

          7,4713755




          7,4713755





















              15












              $begingroup$

              You should switch advisors. Since you are independently writing papers and have a track record, it should be possible to find a fair-minded theory advisor in a different technical area who is willing to do the administrative aspects of handling a PhD thesis. Your department chair should also help in this matter.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                15












                $begingroup$

                You should switch advisors. Since you are independently writing papers and have a track record, it should be possible to find a fair-minded theory advisor in a different technical area who is willing to do the administrative aspects of handling a PhD thesis. Your department chair should also help in this matter.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  15












                  15








                  15





                  $begingroup$

                  You should switch advisors. Since you are independently writing papers and have a track record, it should be possible to find a fair-minded theory advisor in a different technical area who is willing to do the administrative aspects of handling a PhD thesis. Your department chair should also help in this matter.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  You should switch advisors. Since you are independently writing papers and have a track record, it should be possible to find a fair-minded theory advisor in a different technical area who is willing to do the administrative aspects of handling a PhD thesis. Your department chair should also help in this matter.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 13 at 14:50









                  Chandra ChekuriChandra Chekuri

                  5,5922436




                  5,5922436





















                      7












                      $begingroup$

                      Unfortunately, there is little you can do -- a PhD adviser exercises a great deal of control over the students' careers. I think at this point, you're better off placating her and adding her as a co-author. When you get your degree, avoid whenever possible requesting recommendation letters from her.



                      A major piece of advice I offer all beginning graduate students (which is too late for you) is to ask around before choosing an adviser. Ask former and current students especially, but also faculty (delicately) -- to the degree they're willing to be honest with you. Faculty members rarely comment on each other, but in extreme cases they will (I've gotten pointers from faculty members to avoid certain people). Yours sounds like an extreme case, and I imagine you're not the only one who's experienced this adviser's unethical behavior. Do a service to the community -- if students ask about her, honestly share your experience!



                      Also, consider speaking with your director of graduate studies, who will have more information and may be able to offer better advice.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$








                      • 14




                        $begingroup$
                        I can't quite upvote this due to the recommendation of placating her by adding her as a coauthor. The fact that she's actually threatening to not sign off on the OP's dissertation unless she's given coauthor credit on unrelated papers is sufficiently unethical that there's an obligation to bring this to the attention of someone who can do something about it. But I strongly agree with every other part of this answer.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Ray
                        Apr 12 at 17:21







                      • 5




                        $begingroup$
                        I agree that my advice to placate the adviser is unfair, but I still think it's the most pragmatic suggestion, given how little I know about the specifics. My main concern is about the OP's academic future, which can be harmed by scandals -- especially if the adviser wields a lot of power around the department.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Aryeh
                        Apr 13 at 19:29















                      7












                      $begingroup$

                      Unfortunately, there is little you can do -- a PhD adviser exercises a great deal of control over the students' careers. I think at this point, you're better off placating her and adding her as a co-author. When you get your degree, avoid whenever possible requesting recommendation letters from her.



                      A major piece of advice I offer all beginning graduate students (which is too late for you) is to ask around before choosing an adviser. Ask former and current students especially, but also faculty (delicately) -- to the degree they're willing to be honest with you. Faculty members rarely comment on each other, but in extreme cases they will (I've gotten pointers from faculty members to avoid certain people). Yours sounds like an extreme case, and I imagine you're not the only one who's experienced this adviser's unethical behavior. Do a service to the community -- if students ask about her, honestly share your experience!



                      Also, consider speaking with your director of graduate studies, who will have more information and may be able to offer better advice.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$








                      • 14




                        $begingroup$
                        I can't quite upvote this due to the recommendation of placating her by adding her as a coauthor. The fact that she's actually threatening to not sign off on the OP's dissertation unless she's given coauthor credit on unrelated papers is sufficiently unethical that there's an obligation to bring this to the attention of someone who can do something about it. But I strongly agree with every other part of this answer.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Ray
                        Apr 12 at 17:21







                      • 5




                        $begingroup$
                        I agree that my advice to placate the adviser is unfair, but I still think it's the most pragmatic suggestion, given how little I know about the specifics. My main concern is about the OP's academic future, which can be harmed by scandals -- especially if the adviser wields a lot of power around the department.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Aryeh
                        Apr 13 at 19:29













                      7












                      7








                      7





                      $begingroup$

                      Unfortunately, there is little you can do -- a PhD adviser exercises a great deal of control over the students' careers. I think at this point, you're better off placating her and adding her as a co-author. When you get your degree, avoid whenever possible requesting recommendation letters from her.



                      A major piece of advice I offer all beginning graduate students (which is too late for you) is to ask around before choosing an adviser. Ask former and current students especially, but also faculty (delicately) -- to the degree they're willing to be honest with you. Faculty members rarely comment on each other, but in extreme cases they will (I've gotten pointers from faculty members to avoid certain people). Yours sounds like an extreme case, and I imagine you're not the only one who's experienced this adviser's unethical behavior. Do a service to the community -- if students ask about her, honestly share your experience!



                      Also, consider speaking with your director of graduate studies, who will have more information and may be able to offer better advice.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      Unfortunately, there is little you can do -- a PhD adviser exercises a great deal of control over the students' careers. I think at this point, you're better off placating her and adding her as a co-author. When you get your degree, avoid whenever possible requesting recommendation letters from her.



                      A major piece of advice I offer all beginning graduate students (which is too late for you) is to ask around before choosing an adviser. Ask former and current students especially, but also faculty (delicately) -- to the degree they're willing to be honest with you. Faculty members rarely comment on each other, but in extreme cases they will (I've gotten pointers from faculty members to avoid certain people). Yours sounds like an extreme case, and I imagine you're not the only one who's experienced this adviser's unethical behavior. Do a service to the community -- if students ask about her, honestly share your experience!



                      Also, consider speaking with your director of graduate studies, who will have more information and may be able to offer better advice.







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered Apr 12 at 6:53









                      AryehAryeh

                      6,01411841




                      6,01411841







                      • 14




                        $begingroup$
                        I can't quite upvote this due to the recommendation of placating her by adding her as a coauthor. The fact that she's actually threatening to not sign off on the OP's dissertation unless she's given coauthor credit on unrelated papers is sufficiently unethical that there's an obligation to bring this to the attention of someone who can do something about it. But I strongly agree with every other part of this answer.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Ray
                        Apr 12 at 17:21







                      • 5




                        $begingroup$
                        I agree that my advice to placate the adviser is unfair, but I still think it's the most pragmatic suggestion, given how little I know about the specifics. My main concern is about the OP's academic future, which can be harmed by scandals -- especially if the adviser wields a lot of power around the department.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Aryeh
                        Apr 13 at 19:29












                      • 14




                        $begingroup$
                        I can't quite upvote this due to the recommendation of placating her by adding her as a coauthor. The fact that she's actually threatening to not sign off on the OP's dissertation unless she's given coauthor credit on unrelated papers is sufficiently unethical that there's an obligation to bring this to the attention of someone who can do something about it. But I strongly agree with every other part of this answer.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Ray
                        Apr 12 at 17:21







                      • 5




                        $begingroup$
                        I agree that my advice to placate the adviser is unfair, but I still think it's the most pragmatic suggestion, given how little I know about the specifics. My main concern is about the OP's academic future, which can be harmed by scandals -- especially if the adviser wields a lot of power around the department.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Aryeh
                        Apr 13 at 19:29







                      14




                      14




                      $begingroup$
                      I can't quite upvote this due to the recommendation of placating her by adding her as a coauthor. The fact that she's actually threatening to not sign off on the OP's dissertation unless she's given coauthor credit on unrelated papers is sufficiently unethical that there's an obligation to bring this to the attention of someone who can do something about it. But I strongly agree with every other part of this answer.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ray
                      Apr 12 at 17:21





                      $begingroup$
                      I can't quite upvote this due to the recommendation of placating her by adding her as a coauthor. The fact that she's actually threatening to not sign off on the OP's dissertation unless she's given coauthor credit on unrelated papers is sufficiently unethical that there's an obligation to bring this to the attention of someone who can do something about it. But I strongly agree with every other part of this answer.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ray
                      Apr 12 at 17:21





                      5




                      5




                      $begingroup$
                      I agree that my advice to placate the adviser is unfair, but I still think it's the most pragmatic suggestion, given how little I know about the specifics. My main concern is about the OP's academic future, which can be harmed by scandals -- especially if the adviser wields a lot of power around the department.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Aryeh
                      Apr 13 at 19:29




                      $begingroup$
                      I agree that my advice to placate the adviser is unfair, but I still think it's the most pragmatic suggestion, given how little I know about the specifics. My main concern is about the OP's academic future, which can be harmed by scandals -- especially if the adviser wields a lot of power around the department.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Aryeh
                      Apr 13 at 19:29










                      anonymous3724 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      anonymous3724 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      anonymous3724 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      anonymous3724 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcstheory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f42704%2fsingle-author-papers-against-my-advisors-will%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Bulk add to cart function issuecart vs. mini cart issue … rwd themeRedirect Add to cart button to cart pageAdd to cart issue - Magento 2.1The requested Payment Method is not available When creating an orderM2: reason add-to-cart might not function in production modeAdd to cart issue in some android devicesMagento 2 - custom price can not add to subtotal and grand total after add to cartAdd to cart codeIssue with my cart module on pdp and cart pages, just keeps spinningBulk price and quantity update using rest api

                      БиармияSxpst500bh2ntaf! 3h2r