Why isn't KTEX's runway designation 10/28 instead of 9/27?How are runways numbered?How do airports determine when they should change their runway numbers?Why would an airplane pilot choose to intentionally use more runway than required for a takeoff?What are these large yellow circles painted across the runway?Why five touchdown zone markings for only one aiming point?Why is the font size of runway numbers in Canada small?Why building a stopway instead of just building a longer runway?What is the runway holding short line on Taxiway B between B2 and B3 at KFAT for RWY29L?Do runway markings vary from country to country?Can a runway have a displaced threshold and a closed section in the same area?Why are months (e.g. December) used to notate a runway?Why aren't runway numbers painted in a higher aspect ratio?
Your magic is very sketchy
How does it work when somebody invests in my business?
Modify casing of marked letters
Is the destination of a commercial flight important for the pilot?
At which point does a character regain all their Hit Dice?
Bash method for viewing beginning and end of file
Student evaluations of teaching assistants
Failed to fetch jessie backports repository
Implement the Thanos sorting algorithm
Why is delta-v is the most useful quantity for planning space travel?
Is there a good way to store credentials outside of a password manager?
How to be diplomatic in refusing to write code that breaches the privacy of our users
What's a natural way to say that someone works somewhere (for a job)?
What is difference between behavior and behaviour
Ways to speed up user implemented RK4
Why did Kant, Hegel, and Adorno leave some words and phrases in the Greek alphabet?
Curses work by shouting - How to avoid collateral damage?
Print name if parameter passed to function
Is there a problem with hiding "forgot password" until it's needed?
Can criminal fraud exist without damages?
What to do with wrong results in talks?
Was the picture area of a CRT a parallelogram (instead of a true rectangle)?
Why are on-board computers allowed to change controls without notifying the pilots?
If you attempt to grapple an opponent that you are hidden from, do they roll at disadvantage?
Why isn't KTEX's runway designation 10/28 instead of 9/27?
How are runways numbered?How do airports determine when they should change their runway numbers?Why would an airplane pilot choose to intentionally use more runway than required for a takeoff?What are these large yellow circles painted across the runway?Why five touchdown zone markings for only one aiming point?Why is the font size of runway numbers in Canada small?Why building a stopway instead of just building a longer runway?What is the runway holding short line on Taxiway B between B2 and B3 at KFAT for RWY29L?Do runway markings vary from country to country?Can a runway have a displaced threshold and a closed section in the same area?Why are months (e.g. December) used to notate a runway?Why aren't runway numbers painted in a higher aspect ratio?
$begingroup$
Why is the marking on the runway written as (9/27) Telluride (KTEX), Colorado, USA. whereas the direction is 284 degrees? Shouldn't it be (10/28) instead?
usa runways airport-markings
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why is the marking on the runway written as (9/27) Telluride (KTEX), Colorado, USA. whereas the direction is 284 degrees? Shouldn't it be (10/28) instead?
usa runways airport-markings
New contributor
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to Av.SE!
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why is the marking on the runway written as (9/27) Telluride (KTEX), Colorado, USA. whereas the direction is 284 degrees? Shouldn't it be (10/28) instead?
usa runways airport-markings
New contributor
$endgroup$
Why is the marking on the runway written as (9/27) Telluride (KTEX), Colorado, USA. whereas the direction is 284 degrees? Shouldn't it be (10/28) instead?
usa runways airport-markings
usa runways airport-markings
New contributor
New contributor
edited yesterday
ymb1
68.5k7216363
68.5k7216363
New contributor
asked yesterday
Ashraf HassanAshraf Hassan
663
663
New contributor
New contributor
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to Av.SE!
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
yesterday
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to Av.SE!
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to Av.SE!
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
yesterday
$begingroup$
Welcome to Av.SE!
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
That direction (284) is the true heading, but runways are numbered according to the magnetic heading.
Runways are usually numbered according to their direction, more precisely called runway magnetic bearing or QFU (see Q codes). (How are runways numbered?)
For KTEX:
276 magnetic, 285 true
096 magnetic, 105 true
While 276 should be rounded to runway 28, it could be a recent change that the magnetic heading changed to 276 from say <275. There is a process to go through, so a recent change in magnetic variation does not mean the renumbering will swiftly follow.
Every five years, the FAA reevaluates shifts in the pole—its magnetic variation—and makes changes to runways and flight procedures as needed. (How do airports determine when they should change their runway numbers?)
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
For the curious, the NOAA has historical magnetic declination data. The map does indeed show that the magnetic declination around Telluride has shifted by about 1° over the past ten years, which lends credence to the idea that the magnetic heading used to be less than 275°.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
yesterday
3
$begingroup$
Yeah, the magnetic North Pole has actually moved by a surprising large amount over the last few decades. It used to wander around relatively slowly over Northern Canada, but it's been quickly accelerating straight towards Russia over the last few decades. It was over Northern Canada in 1994 and is now almost halfway to Russia.
$endgroup$
– reirab
yesterday
$begingroup$
@reirab I smell collusion.
$endgroup$
– hobbs
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@hobbs Yeah, it started in the Soviet era. Obvious Communist plot to steal the North Pole from NATO countries.
$endgroup$
– reirab
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Ashraf Hassan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61594%2fwhy-isnt-ktexs-runway-designation-10-28-instead-of-9-27%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
That direction (284) is the true heading, but runways are numbered according to the magnetic heading.
Runways are usually numbered according to their direction, more precisely called runway magnetic bearing or QFU (see Q codes). (How are runways numbered?)
For KTEX:
276 magnetic, 285 true
096 magnetic, 105 true
While 276 should be rounded to runway 28, it could be a recent change that the magnetic heading changed to 276 from say <275. There is a process to go through, so a recent change in magnetic variation does not mean the renumbering will swiftly follow.
Every five years, the FAA reevaluates shifts in the pole—its magnetic variation—and makes changes to runways and flight procedures as needed. (How do airports determine when they should change their runway numbers?)
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
For the curious, the NOAA has historical magnetic declination data. The map does indeed show that the magnetic declination around Telluride has shifted by about 1° over the past ten years, which lends credence to the idea that the magnetic heading used to be less than 275°.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
yesterday
3
$begingroup$
Yeah, the magnetic North Pole has actually moved by a surprising large amount over the last few decades. It used to wander around relatively slowly over Northern Canada, but it's been quickly accelerating straight towards Russia over the last few decades. It was over Northern Canada in 1994 and is now almost halfway to Russia.
$endgroup$
– reirab
yesterday
$begingroup$
@reirab I smell collusion.
$endgroup$
– hobbs
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@hobbs Yeah, it started in the Soviet era. Obvious Communist plot to steal the North Pole from NATO countries.
$endgroup$
– reirab
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That direction (284) is the true heading, but runways are numbered according to the magnetic heading.
Runways are usually numbered according to their direction, more precisely called runway magnetic bearing or QFU (see Q codes). (How are runways numbered?)
For KTEX:
276 magnetic, 285 true
096 magnetic, 105 true
While 276 should be rounded to runway 28, it could be a recent change that the magnetic heading changed to 276 from say <275. There is a process to go through, so a recent change in magnetic variation does not mean the renumbering will swiftly follow.
Every five years, the FAA reevaluates shifts in the pole—its magnetic variation—and makes changes to runways and flight procedures as needed. (How do airports determine when they should change their runway numbers?)
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
For the curious, the NOAA has historical magnetic declination data. The map does indeed show that the magnetic declination around Telluride has shifted by about 1° over the past ten years, which lends credence to the idea that the magnetic heading used to be less than 275°.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
yesterday
3
$begingroup$
Yeah, the magnetic North Pole has actually moved by a surprising large amount over the last few decades. It used to wander around relatively slowly over Northern Canada, but it's been quickly accelerating straight towards Russia over the last few decades. It was over Northern Canada in 1994 and is now almost halfway to Russia.
$endgroup$
– reirab
yesterday
$begingroup$
@reirab I smell collusion.
$endgroup$
– hobbs
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@hobbs Yeah, it started in the Soviet era. Obvious Communist plot to steal the North Pole from NATO countries.
$endgroup$
– reirab
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That direction (284) is the true heading, but runways are numbered according to the magnetic heading.
Runways are usually numbered according to their direction, more precisely called runway magnetic bearing or QFU (see Q codes). (How are runways numbered?)
For KTEX:
276 magnetic, 285 true
096 magnetic, 105 true
While 276 should be rounded to runway 28, it could be a recent change that the magnetic heading changed to 276 from say <275. There is a process to go through, so a recent change in magnetic variation does not mean the renumbering will swiftly follow.
Every five years, the FAA reevaluates shifts in the pole—its magnetic variation—and makes changes to runways and flight procedures as needed. (How do airports determine when they should change their runway numbers?)
$endgroup$
That direction (284) is the true heading, but runways are numbered according to the magnetic heading.
Runways are usually numbered according to their direction, more precisely called runway magnetic bearing or QFU (see Q codes). (How are runways numbered?)
For KTEX:
276 magnetic, 285 true
096 magnetic, 105 true
While 276 should be rounded to runway 28, it could be a recent change that the magnetic heading changed to 276 from say <275. There is a process to go through, so a recent change in magnetic variation does not mean the renumbering will swiftly follow.
Every five years, the FAA reevaluates shifts in the pole—its magnetic variation—and makes changes to runways and flight procedures as needed. (How do airports determine when they should change their runway numbers?)
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
ymb1ymb1
68.5k7216363
68.5k7216363
3
$begingroup$
For the curious, the NOAA has historical magnetic declination data. The map does indeed show that the magnetic declination around Telluride has shifted by about 1° over the past ten years, which lends credence to the idea that the magnetic heading used to be less than 275°.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
yesterday
3
$begingroup$
Yeah, the magnetic North Pole has actually moved by a surprising large amount over the last few decades. It used to wander around relatively slowly over Northern Canada, but it's been quickly accelerating straight towards Russia over the last few decades. It was over Northern Canada in 1994 and is now almost halfway to Russia.
$endgroup$
– reirab
yesterday
$begingroup$
@reirab I smell collusion.
$endgroup$
– hobbs
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@hobbs Yeah, it started in the Soviet era. Obvious Communist plot to steal the North Pole from NATO countries.
$endgroup$
– reirab
yesterday
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
For the curious, the NOAA has historical magnetic declination data. The map does indeed show that the magnetic declination around Telluride has shifted by about 1° over the past ten years, which lends credence to the idea that the magnetic heading used to be less than 275°.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
yesterday
3
$begingroup$
Yeah, the magnetic North Pole has actually moved by a surprising large amount over the last few decades. It used to wander around relatively slowly over Northern Canada, but it's been quickly accelerating straight towards Russia over the last few decades. It was over Northern Canada in 1994 and is now almost halfway to Russia.
$endgroup$
– reirab
yesterday
$begingroup$
@reirab I smell collusion.
$endgroup$
– hobbs
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@hobbs Yeah, it started in the Soviet era. Obvious Communist plot to steal the North Pole from NATO countries.
$endgroup$
– reirab
yesterday
3
3
$begingroup$
For the curious, the NOAA has historical magnetic declination data. The map does indeed show that the magnetic declination around Telluride has shifted by about 1° over the past ten years, which lends credence to the idea that the magnetic heading used to be less than 275°.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
yesterday
$begingroup$
For the curious, the NOAA has historical magnetic declination data. The map does indeed show that the magnetic declination around Telluride has shifted by about 1° over the past ten years, which lends credence to the idea that the magnetic heading used to be less than 275°.
$endgroup$
– Michael Seifert
yesterday
3
3
$begingroup$
Yeah, the magnetic North Pole has actually moved by a surprising large amount over the last few decades. It used to wander around relatively slowly over Northern Canada, but it's been quickly accelerating straight towards Russia over the last few decades. It was over Northern Canada in 1994 and is now almost halfway to Russia.
$endgroup$
– reirab
yesterday
$begingroup$
Yeah, the magnetic North Pole has actually moved by a surprising large amount over the last few decades. It used to wander around relatively slowly over Northern Canada, but it's been quickly accelerating straight towards Russia over the last few decades. It was over Northern Canada in 1994 and is now almost halfway to Russia.
$endgroup$
– reirab
yesterday
$begingroup$
@reirab I smell collusion.
$endgroup$
– hobbs
yesterday
$begingroup$
@reirab I smell collusion.
$endgroup$
– hobbs
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
@hobbs Yeah, it started in the Soviet era. Obvious Communist plot to steal the North Pole from NATO countries.
$endgroup$
– reirab
yesterday
$begingroup$
@hobbs Yeah, it started in the Soviet era. Obvious Communist plot to steal the North Pole from NATO countries.
$endgroup$
– reirab
yesterday
add a comment |
Ashraf Hassan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ashraf Hassan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ashraf Hassan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ashraf Hassan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61594%2fwhy-isnt-ktexs-runway-designation-10-28-instead-of-9-27%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Welcome to Av.SE!
$endgroup$
– Ralph J
yesterday