Can criminal fraud exist without damages? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowSomeone withdrew money from my bank account - what are my rights?Is a high % agent commission contract clause fraud in your jurisdiction?What is the difference between civil fraud and criminal fraud?Can the Feds not put Bank Executives (or their employees) in Prison for Fraud?Why a civil court can order damages for killing a person?How well can one know the rules in gambling before it's legally fraud?If the damages from a lawsuit force the defendant into bankruptcy, are they forgiven?How is getting foreign investors to support your bank fraud? (Barclays)Do we have attempted fraud laws like we have attempted murder?Is Intentional Immaterial Fraud Legal?

Removing read access from a file

How to start emacs in "nothing" mode (`fundamental-mode`)

Trouble understanding the speech of overseas colleagues

When airplanes disconnect from a tanker during air to air refueling, why do they bank so sharply to the right?

Is HostGator storing my password in plaintext?

How do I get the green key off the shelf in the Dobby level of Lego Harry Potter 2?

What is meant by a M next to a roman numeral?

How should I support this large drywall patch?

Why Were Madagascar and New Zealand Discovered So Late?

Why is there a PLL in CPU?

Can the Reverse Gravity spell affect the Meteor Swarm spell?

Why doesn't a table tennis ball float on the surface? How do we calculate buoyancy here?

How to be diplomatic in refusing to write code that breaches the privacy of our users

A pseudo-riley?

When did Lisp start using symbols for arithmetic?

How to write the block matrix in LaTex?

How can I open an app using Terminal?

Anatomically Correct Mesopelagic Aves

How do scammers retract money, while you can’t?

Visit to the USA with ESTA approved before trip to Iran

Why does standard notation not preserve intervals (visually)

Example of a Mathematician/Physicist whose Other Publications during their PhD eclipsed their PhD Thesis

Describing a person. What needs to be mentioned?

Rotate a column



Can criminal fraud exist without damages?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowSomeone withdrew money from my bank account - what are my rights?Is a high % agent commission contract clause fraud in your jurisdiction?What is the difference between civil fraud and criminal fraud?Can the Feds not put Bank Executives (or their employees) in Prison for Fraud?Why a civil court can order damages for killing a person?How well can one know the rules in gambling before it's legally fraud?If the damages from a lawsuit force the defendant into bankruptcy, are they forgiven?How is getting foreign investors to support your bank fraud? (Barclays)Do we have attempted fraud laws like we have attempted murder?Is Intentional Immaterial Fraud Legal?










9















If I fraud someone, invest their money and pay it back is there any criminal offense? Does fraud require damages? Will most judges realistically treat this a criminal case?










share|improve this question









New contributor




user24954 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 14





    If you rob a bank, spend the money, win the lottery and pay it back, is it still a crime?

    – Ron Beyer
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @RonBeyer your case is different, because the robber has not committed fraud, but theft. And yes, it would still be a crime, even if you pay the money back later.

    – Shazamo Morebucks
    2 days ago






  • 2





    I feel like the last question should be edited out because it doesn't make sense. A case is either criminal or civil. Civil and criminal statutes are different (though sometimes related) and only a government prosecutor can bring a criminal charge against a person, while anyone can file civil charges. Most importantly, the a set of facts can give rise to both civil and criminal cases, or it could be sufficient for some but not others, or none.

    – IllusiveBrian
    yesterday






  • 3





    Did you mean: "If I tell someone I put his money in some investment A, but I put his money into a different investment B, and then pay him back at the agreed time with the amount he expects if his money was invested in A, is it fraud?"

    – Alexander
    yesterday






  • 1





    Did you also pay interest on your fraudulently-acquired "loan"?

    – RonJohn
    yesterday















9















If I fraud someone, invest their money and pay it back is there any criminal offense? Does fraud require damages? Will most judges realistically treat this a criminal case?










share|improve this question









New contributor




user24954 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 14





    If you rob a bank, spend the money, win the lottery and pay it back, is it still a crime?

    – Ron Beyer
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @RonBeyer your case is different, because the robber has not committed fraud, but theft. And yes, it would still be a crime, even if you pay the money back later.

    – Shazamo Morebucks
    2 days ago






  • 2





    I feel like the last question should be edited out because it doesn't make sense. A case is either criminal or civil. Civil and criminal statutes are different (though sometimes related) and only a government prosecutor can bring a criminal charge against a person, while anyone can file civil charges. Most importantly, the a set of facts can give rise to both civil and criminal cases, or it could be sufficient for some but not others, or none.

    – IllusiveBrian
    yesterday






  • 3





    Did you mean: "If I tell someone I put his money in some investment A, but I put his money into a different investment B, and then pay him back at the agreed time with the amount he expects if his money was invested in A, is it fraud?"

    – Alexander
    yesterday






  • 1





    Did you also pay interest on your fraudulently-acquired "loan"?

    – RonJohn
    yesterday













9












9








9








If I fraud someone, invest their money and pay it back is there any criminal offense? Does fraud require damages? Will most judges realistically treat this a criminal case?










share|improve this question









New contributor




user24954 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












If I fraud someone, invest their money and pay it back is there any criminal offense? Does fraud require damages? Will most judges realistically treat this a criminal case?







united-states fraud






share|improve this question









New contributor




user24954 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




user24954 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









A. K.

1,4321127




1,4321127






New contributor




user24954 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









user24954user24954

6113




6113




New contributor




user24954 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user24954 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user24954 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 14





    If you rob a bank, spend the money, win the lottery and pay it back, is it still a crime?

    – Ron Beyer
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @RonBeyer your case is different, because the robber has not committed fraud, but theft. And yes, it would still be a crime, even if you pay the money back later.

    – Shazamo Morebucks
    2 days ago






  • 2





    I feel like the last question should be edited out because it doesn't make sense. A case is either criminal or civil. Civil and criminal statutes are different (though sometimes related) and only a government prosecutor can bring a criminal charge against a person, while anyone can file civil charges. Most importantly, the a set of facts can give rise to both civil and criminal cases, or it could be sufficient for some but not others, or none.

    – IllusiveBrian
    yesterday






  • 3





    Did you mean: "If I tell someone I put his money in some investment A, but I put his money into a different investment B, and then pay him back at the agreed time with the amount he expects if his money was invested in A, is it fraud?"

    – Alexander
    yesterday






  • 1





    Did you also pay interest on your fraudulently-acquired "loan"?

    – RonJohn
    yesterday












  • 14





    If you rob a bank, spend the money, win the lottery and pay it back, is it still a crime?

    – Ron Beyer
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @RonBeyer your case is different, because the robber has not committed fraud, but theft. And yes, it would still be a crime, even if you pay the money back later.

    – Shazamo Morebucks
    2 days ago






  • 2





    I feel like the last question should be edited out because it doesn't make sense. A case is either criminal or civil. Civil and criminal statutes are different (though sometimes related) and only a government prosecutor can bring a criminal charge against a person, while anyone can file civil charges. Most importantly, the a set of facts can give rise to both civil and criminal cases, or it could be sufficient for some but not others, or none.

    – IllusiveBrian
    yesterday






  • 3





    Did you mean: "If I tell someone I put his money in some investment A, but I put his money into a different investment B, and then pay him back at the agreed time with the amount he expects if his money was invested in A, is it fraud?"

    – Alexander
    yesterday






  • 1





    Did you also pay interest on your fraudulently-acquired "loan"?

    – RonJohn
    yesterday







14




14





If you rob a bank, spend the money, win the lottery and pay it back, is it still a crime?

– Ron Beyer
2 days ago





If you rob a bank, spend the money, win the lottery and pay it back, is it still a crime?

– Ron Beyer
2 days ago




1




1





@RonBeyer your case is different, because the robber has not committed fraud, but theft. And yes, it would still be a crime, even if you pay the money back later.

– Shazamo Morebucks
2 days ago





@RonBeyer your case is different, because the robber has not committed fraud, but theft. And yes, it would still be a crime, even if you pay the money back later.

– Shazamo Morebucks
2 days ago




2




2





I feel like the last question should be edited out because it doesn't make sense. A case is either criminal or civil. Civil and criminal statutes are different (though sometimes related) and only a government prosecutor can bring a criminal charge against a person, while anyone can file civil charges. Most importantly, the a set of facts can give rise to both civil and criminal cases, or it could be sufficient for some but not others, or none.

– IllusiveBrian
yesterday





I feel like the last question should be edited out because it doesn't make sense. A case is either criminal or civil. Civil and criminal statutes are different (though sometimes related) and only a government prosecutor can bring a criminal charge against a person, while anyone can file civil charges. Most importantly, the a set of facts can give rise to both civil and criminal cases, or it could be sufficient for some but not others, or none.

– IllusiveBrian
yesterday




3




3





Did you mean: "If I tell someone I put his money in some investment A, but I put his money into a different investment B, and then pay him back at the agreed time with the amount he expects if his money was invested in A, is it fraud?"

– Alexander
yesterday





Did you mean: "If I tell someone I put his money in some investment A, but I put his money into a different investment B, and then pay him back at the agreed time with the amount he expects if his money was invested in A, is it fraud?"

– Alexander
yesterday




1




1





Did you also pay interest on your fraudulently-acquired "loan"?

– RonJohn
yesterday





Did you also pay interest on your fraudulently-acquired "loan"?

– RonJohn
yesterday










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















23














If a person is wrongfully deprived of money (or something else of value) for a period, that is damage, even if the money is later repaid. The victim might have used the money in some profitable or advantageous way during the period when it was taken. But the victim need not prove exactly how s/he might have profited, it is enough to show that the victim was wrongfully deprived of something of value.



Of course, there are other elements to fraud. There must have been a lie or deception, on which the victim reasonably relied. There must have been intent that the victim so relay. The deception must have been material and must have directly caused or led to the damage. (Or have gotten the Fraudster a benefit that would not have been provided had the victim known the truth.)



But assuming that all the elements of fraud are proved, restitution, even full restitution with interest, does not excuse the fraud.



However, as a practical matter, if offered full restitution on condition of a release or an agreement not to prosecute, many victims will choose to take it, preferring their money back, perhaps with interest, to a legal case, even a winning one.






share|improve this answer

























  • Would the deception be material if there was no cost?

    – user24954
    yesterday






  • 3





    @user24954 "material" in this context usually means that the deception influenced the decision, or that it might have influenced the decision of a reasonable person. "caused or led to the damage" is also an element of fraud, and if there was no damage there was no fraud (possilby attempted fraud). But a cost later repaid is not "no damage".

    – David Siegel
    yesterday











  • I wonder where the line of wrongfully deprived is drawn. If I tell you "give me $1000, and in 6 months I will return you $5000 from the Nigerian prince I represent", but instead start a food truck business with the $1000, and give you the $5k as promised, I've clearly done something unethical, but nobody was deprived of anything they didn't agree to.

    – mbrig
    yesterday











  • @mbrig Thew risk that the food truck would fail to earn enough to pay back $5k is probably higher than the risk that the Prince won't have the cash. The was materiel deception with the intent of gain a benefit that would not otherwise have been gained. In most jurisdictions, that is also fraud. The damage was in getting the investor to take a risk that s/he would not have with accurate info.

    – David Siegel
    yesterday


















8














You say "criminal fraud", if you mean exactly that, then no, returning the money, or offering even more money, will not be a defense.



You committed a crime and can be convicted for it even if you gave back more money than the complainant had "lost".



There may be a case for if someone initiated civil proceedings against you on the basis of fraud, since you can simply pay whatever damages that person may seek, and settle the claim.






share|improve this answer


















  • 4





    But note that fraud may entitle the victim to triple damages, or other damages beyond simple restitution, so the damages the victim may seek might not be the same as the original loss.

    – David Siegel
    yesterday











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "617"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






user24954 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38459%2fcan-criminal-fraud-exist-without-damages%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









23














If a person is wrongfully deprived of money (or something else of value) for a period, that is damage, even if the money is later repaid. The victim might have used the money in some profitable or advantageous way during the period when it was taken. But the victim need not prove exactly how s/he might have profited, it is enough to show that the victim was wrongfully deprived of something of value.



Of course, there are other elements to fraud. There must have been a lie or deception, on which the victim reasonably relied. There must have been intent that the victim so relay. The deception must have been material and must have directly caused or led to the damage. (Or have gotten the Fraudster a benefit that would not have been provided had the victim known the truth.)



But assuming that all the elements of fraud are proved, restitution, even full restitution with interest, does not excuse the fraud.



However, as a practical matter, if offered full restitution on condition of a release or an agreement not to prosecute, many victims will choose to take it, preferring their money back, perhaps with interest, to a legal case, even a winning one.






share|improve this answer

























  • Would the deception be material if there was no cost?

    – user24954
    yesterday






  • 3





    @user24954 "material" in this context usually means that the deception influenced the decision, or that it might have influenced the decision of a reasonable person. "caused or led to the damage" is also an element of fraud, and if there was no damage there was no fraud (possilby attempted fraud). But a cost later repaid is not "no damage".

    – David Siegel
    yesterday











  • I wonder where the line of wrongfully deprived is drawn. If I tell you "give me $1000, and in 6 months I will return you $5000 from the Nigerian prince I represent", but instead start a food truck business with the $1000, and give you the $5k as promised, I've clearly done something unethical, but nobody was deprived of anything they didn't agree to.

    – mbrig
    yesterday











  • @mbrig Thew risk that the food truck would fail to earn enough to pay back $5k is probably higher than the risk that the Prince won't have the cash. The was materiel deception with the intent of gain a benefit that would not otherwise have been gained. In most jurisdictions, that is also fraud. The damage was in getting the investor to take a risk that s/he would not have with accurate info.

    – David Siegel
    yesterday















23














If a person is wrongfully deprived of money (or something else of value) for a period, that is damage, even if the money is later repaid. The victim might have used the money in some profitable or advantageous way during the period when it was taken. But the victim need not prove exactly how s/he might have profited, it is enough to show that the victim was wrongfully deprived of something of value.



Of course, there are other elements to fraud. There must have been a lie or deception, on which the victim reasonably relied. There must have been intent that the victim so relay. The deception must have been material and must have directly caused or led to the damage. (Or have gotten the Fraudster a benefit that would not have been provided had the victim known the truth.)



But assuming that all the elements of fraud are proved, restitution, even full restitution with interest, does not excuse the fraud.



However, as a practical matter, if offered full restitution on condition of a release or an agreement not to prosecute, many victims will choose to take it, preferring their money back, perhaps with interest, to a legal case, even a winning one.






share|improve this answer

























  • Would the deception be material if there was no cost?

    – user24954
    yesterday






  • 3





    @user24954 "material" in this context usually means that the deception influenced the decision, or that it might have influenced the decision of a reasonable person. "caused or led to the damage" is also an element of fraud, and if there was no damage there was no fraud (possilby attempted fraud). But a cost later repaid is not "no damage".

    – David Siegel
    yesterday











  • I wonder where the line of wrongfully deprived is drawn. If I tell you "give me $1000, and in 6 months I will return you $5000 from the Nigerian prince I represent", but instead start a food truck business with the $1000, and give you the $5k as promised, I've clearly done something unethical, but nobody was deprived of anything they didn't agree to.

    – mbrig
    yesterday











  • @mbrig Thew risk that the food truck would fail to earn enough to pay back $5k is probably higher than the risk that the Prince won't have the cash. The was materiel deception with the intent of gain a benefit that would not otherwise have been gained. In most jurisdictions, that is also fraud. The damage was in getting the investor to take a risk that s/he would not have with accurate info.

    – David Siegel
    yesterday













23












23








23







If a person is wrongfully deprived of money (or something else of value) for a period, that is damage, even if the money is later repaid. The victim might have used the money in some profitable or advantageous way during the period when it was taken. But the victim need not prove exactly how s/he might have profited, it is enough to show that the victim was wrongfully deprived of something of value.



Of course, there are other elements to fraud. There must have been a lie or deception, on which the victim reasonably relied. There must have been intent that the victim so relay. The deception must have been material and must have directly caused or led to the damage. (Or have gotten the Fraudster a benefit that would not have been provided had the victim known the truth.)



But assuming that all the elements of fraud are proved, restitution, even full restitution with interest, does not excuse the fraud.



However, as a practical matter, if offered full restitution on condition of a release or an agreement not to prosecute, many victims will choose to take it, preferring their money back, perhaps with interest, to a legal case, even a winning one.






share|improve this answer















If a person is wrongfully deprived of money (or something else of value) for a period, that is damage, even if the money is later repaid. The victim might have used the money in some profitable or advantageous way during the period when it was taken. But the victim need not prove exactly how s/he might have profited, it is enough to show that the victim was wrongfully deprived of something of value.



Of course, there are other elements to fraud. There must have been a lie or deception, on which the victim reasonably relied. There must have been intent that the victim so relay. The deception must have been material and must have directly caused or led to the damage. (Or have gotten the Fraudster a benefit that would not have been provided had the victim known the truth.)



But assuming that all the elements of fraud are proved, restitution, even full restitution with interest, does not excuse the fraud.



However, as a practical matter, if offered full restitution on condition of a release or an agreement not to prosecute, many victims will choose to take it, preferring their money back, perhaps with interest, to a legal case, even a winning one.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited yesterday

























answered 2 days ago









David SiegelDavid Siegel

15.1k3159




15.1k3159












  • Would the deception be material if there was no cost?

    – user24954
    yesterday






  • 3





    @user24954 "material" in this context usually means that the deception influenced the decision, or that it might have influenced the decision of a reasonable person. "caused or led to the damage" is also an element of fraud, and if there was no damage there was no fraud (possilby attempted fraud). But a cost later repaid is not "no damage".

    – David Siegel
    yesterday











  • I wonder where the line of wrongfully deprived is drawn. If I tell you "give me $1000, and in 6 months I will return you $5000 from the Nigerian prince I represent", but instead start a food truck business with the $1000, and give you the $5k as promised, I've clearly done something unethical, but nobody was deprived of anything they didn't agree to.

    – mbrig
    yesterday











  • @mbrig Thew risk that the food truck would fail to earn enough to pay back $5k is probably higher than the risk that the Prince won't have the cash. The was materiel deception with the intent of gain a benefit that would not otherwise have been gained. In most jurisdictions, that is also fraud. The damage was in getting the investor to take a risk that s/he would not have with accurate info.

    – David Siegel
    yesterday

















  • Would the deception be material if there was no cost?

    – user24954
    yesterday






  • 3





    @user24954 "material" in this context usually means that the deception influenced the decision, or that it might have influenced the decision of a reasonable person. "caused or led to the damage" is also an element of fraud, and if there was no damage there was no fraud (possilby attempted fraud). But a cost later repaid is not "no damage".

    – David Siegel
    yesterday











  • I wonder where the line of wrongfully deprived is drawn. If I tell you "give me $1000, and in 6 months I will return you $5000 from the Nigerian prince I represent", but instead start a food truck business with the $1000, and give you the $5k as promised, I've clearly done something unethical, but nobody was deprived of anything they didn't agree to.

    – mbrig
    yesterday











  • @mbrig Thew risk that the food truck would fail to earn enough to pay back $5k is probably higher than the risk that the Prince won't have the cash. The was materiel deception with the intent of gain a benefit that would not otherwise have been gained. In most jurisdictions, that is also fraud. The damage was in getting the investor to take a risk that s/he would not have with accurate info.

    – David Siegel
    yesterday
















Would the deception be material if there was no cost?

– user24954
yesterday





Would the deception be material if there was no cost?

– user24954
yesterday




3




3





@user24954 "material" in this context usually means that the deception influenced the decision, or that it might have influenced the decision of a reasonable person. "caused or led to the damage" is also an element of fraud, and if there was no damage there was no fraud (possilby attempted fraud). But a cost later repaid is not "no damage".

– David Siegel
yesterday





@user24954 "material" in this context usually means that the deception influenced the decision, or that it might have influenced the decision of a reasonable person. "caused or led to the damage" is also an element of fraud, and if there was no damage there was no fraud (possilby attempted fraud). But a cost later repaid is not "no damage".

– David Siegel
yesterday













I wonder where the line of wrongfully deprived is drawn. If I tell you "give me $1000, and in 6 months I will return you $5000 from the Nigerian prince I represent", but instead start a food truck business with the $1000, and give you the $5k as promised, I've clearly done something unethical, but nobody was deprived of anything they didn't agree to.

– mbrig
yesterday





I wonder where the line of wrongfully deprived is drawn. If I tell you "give me $1000, and in 6 months I will return you $5000 from the Nigerian prince I represent", but instead start a food truck business with the $1000, and give you the $5k as promised, I've clearly done something unethical, but nobody was deprived of anything they didn't agree to.

– mbrig
yesterday













@mbrig Thew risk that the food truck would fail to earn enough to pay back $5k is probably higher than the risk that the Prince won't have the cash. The was materiel deception with the intent of gain a benefit that would not otherwise have been gained. In most jurisdictions, that is also fraud. The damage was in getting the investor to take a risk that s/he would not have with accurate info.

– David Siegel
yesterday





@mbrig Thew risk that the food truck would fail to earn enough to pay back $5k is probably higher than the risk that the Prince won't have the cash. The was materiel deception with the intent of gain a benefit that would not otherwise have been gained. In most jurisdictions, that is also fraud. The damage was in getting the investor to take a risk that s/he would not have with accurate info.

– David Siegel
yesterday











8














You say "criminal fraud", if you mean exactly that, then no, returning the money, or offering even more money, will not be a defense.



You committed a crime and can be convicted for it even if you gave back more money than the complainant had "lost".



There may be a case for if someone initiated civil proceedings against you on the basis of fraud, since you can simply pay whatever damages that person may seek, and settle the claim.






share|improve this answer


















  • 4





    But note that fraud may entitle the victim to triple damages, or other damages beyond simple restitution, so the damages the victim may seek might not be the same as the original loss.

    – David Siegel
    yesterday















8














You say "criminal fraud", if you mean exactly that, then no, returning the money, or offering even more money, will not be a defense.



You committed a crime and can be convicted for it even if you gave back more money than the complainant had "lost".



There may be a case for if someone initiated civil proceedings against you on the basis of fraud, since you can simply pay whatever damages that person may seek, and settle the claim.






share|improve this answer


















  • 4





    But note that fraud may entitle the victim to triple damages, or other damages beyond simple restitution, so the damages the victim may seek might not be the same as the original loss.

    – David Siegel
    yesterday













8












8








8







You say "criminal fraud", if you mean exactly that, then no, returning the money, or offering even more money, will not be a defense.



You committed a crime and can be convicted for it even if you gave back more money than the complainant had "lost".



There may be a case for if someone initiated civil proceedings against you on the basis of fraud, since you can simply pay whatever damages that person may seek, and settle the claim.






share|improve this answer













You say "criminal fraud", if you mean exactly that, then no, returning the money, or offering even more money, will not be a defense.



You committed a crime and can be convicted for it even if you gave back more money than the complainant had "lost".



There may be a case for if someone initiated civil proceedings against you on the basis of fraud, since you can simply pay whatever damages that person may seek, and settle the claim.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









Shazamo MorebucksShazamo Morebucks

3,0621827




3,0621827







  • 4





    But note that fraud may entitle the victim to triple damages, or other damages beyond simple restitution, so the damages the victim may seek might not be the same as the original loss.

    – David Siegel
    yesterday












  • 4





    But note that fraud may entitle the victim to triple damages, or other damages beyond simple restitution, so the damages the victim may seek might not be the same as the original loss.

    – David Siegel
    yesterday







4




4





But note that fraud may entitle the victim to triple damages, or other damages beyond simple restitution, so the damages the victim may seek might not be the same as the original loss.

– David Siegel
yesterday





But note that fraud may entitle the victim to triple damages, or other damages beyond simple restitution, so the damages the victim may seek might not be the same as the original loss.

– David Siegel
yesterday










user24954 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















user24954 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












user24954 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











user24954 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Law Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flaw.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38459%2fcan-criminal-fraud-exist-without-damages%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bulk add to cart function issuecart vs. mini cart issue … rwd themeRedirect Add to cart button to cart pageAdd to cart issue - Magento 2.1The requested Payment Method is not available When creating an orderM2: reason add-to-cart might not function in production modeAdd to cart issue in some android devicesMagento 2 - custom price can not add to subtotal and grand total after add to cartAdd to cart codeIssue with my cart module on pdp and cart pages, just keeps spinningBulk price and quantity update using rest api

Magento2 - How to hide price filter only in specific categories?Multiselect price filter attribute in layered navigationhide only some categories from layered navigation in magentoRemove Price Filter on certain categoriescustomize layered price filter?Hide Price for a particular customer groupPrice filter in layered navigation not working correctly with price including tax in magento 2.2.3Magento 2 how to hide attribute at Layered navigation?Magento 2. how to hide price only for specific categoriesMagento 2 How can I hide the price and total from cart and checkout summary?Magento2: Can we add navigation layered filter like price filter for other attribute?