Relation between Frobenius, spectral norm and sum of maxima The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InKind of submultiplicativity of the Frobenius norm: $|AB|_F leq |A|_2|B|_F$?Bounding sum of first singular values squared for Kronecker sum of traceless matricesOperator norm vs spectral radius for positive matricesBounds on the effect of a matrix product on the Frobenius normBounds on smallest Eigenvalue of the Sum of a Standard Laplacian and a Diagonal MatrixHow to calculate expected value of matrix norms of $A^TA$?Norm and trace inequalitiesMinimize spectral norm under diagonal similarityOperator norm of a soft thresholded symmetric matrixRelation between Frobenius norm, infinity norm and sum of maxima

Relation between Frobenius, spectral norm and sum of maxima



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InKind of submultiplicativity of the Frobenius norm: $|AB|_F leq |A|_2|B|_F$?Bounding sum of first singular values squared for Kronecker sum of traceless matricesOperator norm vs spectral radius for positive matricesBounds on the effect of a matrix product on the Frobenius normBounds on smallest Eigenvalue of the Sum of a Standard Laplacian and a Diagonal MatrixHow to calculate expected value of matrix norms of $A^TA$?Norm and trace inequalitiesMinimize spectral norm under diagonal similarityOperator norm of a soft thresholded symmetric matrixRelation between Frobenius norm, infinity norm and sum of maxima










4












$begingroup$


Let $A$ be a $n times n$ matrix so that the Frobenius norm squared $|A|_F^2$ is $Theta(n)$, the spectral norm squared $|A|_2^2=1$. Is it true that $sum_i=1^nmax_1leq jleq n |A_ij|^2$ is $Omega(n)$? Assume that $n$ is sufficiently large.



I cannot find a relation between matrix norms that can show this. The idea behind this question is that there are many singular values of $A$ that are $Theta(1)$.



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




horxio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    According to Wikipedia, $|A|_F=|A|_2$. Please, explain your notation!
    $endgroup$
    – W-t-P
    Apr 7 at 8:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Frobenius norm, where did you find that? It is wrong what you are saying.
    $endgroup$
    – horxio
    Apr 7 at 8:14







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What you are saying is incorrect. Can you please tell me where exactly you found this relation? It is wrong that the Frobenius norm is equal to the spectral norm. Think about it, if they were equal, why should we have two definitions? it holds that $||A||_F geq ||A||_2$.
    $endgroup$
    – horxio
    Apr 7 at 8:23






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The last sentence in the ""Entrywise" matrix norms" reads: The special case p = 2 is the Frobenius norm; see also the "Frobenius norm" section below. Instead of arguing who is (in)correct, please explain your notation.
    $endgroup$
    – W-t-P
    Apr 7 at 8:36







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @W-t-P I find your comments towards a new user a bit aggressive. The problem here is that $|A|_2$ is standard notation for two different things, as the Wikipedia page that you linked also notes (if you read a bit earlier, These norms again share the notation with the induced and entrywise p-norms, but they are different, and earlier the definition of the spectral norm). On the other hand, the terms Frobenius norm and spectral norm are unambiguous and look perfectly fine to me as explanations of the notation in OP's question.
    $endgroup$
    – Federico Poloni
    Apr 7 at 12:43















4












$begingroup$


Let $A$ be a $n times n$ matrix so that the Frobenius norm squared $|A|_F^2$ is $Theta(n)$, the spectral norm squared $|A|_2^2=1$. Is it true that $sum_i=1^nmax_1leq jleq n |A_ij|^2$ is $Omega(n)$? Assume that $n$ is sufficiently large.



I cannot find a relation between matrix norms that can show this. The idea behind this question is that there are many singular values of $A$ that are $Theta(1)$.



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




horxio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    According to Wikipedia, $|A|_F=|A|_2$. Please, explain your notation!
    $endgroup$
    – W-t-P
    Apr 7 at 8:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Frobenius norm, where did you find that? It is wrong what you are saying.
    $endgroup$
    – horxio
    Apr 7 at 8:14







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What you are saying is incorrect. Can you please tell me where exactly you found this relation? It is wrong that the Frobenius norm is equal to the spectral norm. Think about it, if they were equal, why should we have two definitions? it holds that $||A||_F geq ||A||_2$.
    $endgroup$
    – horxio
    Apr 7 at 8:23






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The last sentence in the ""Entrywise" matrix norms" reads: The special case p = 2 is the Frobenius norm; see also the "Frobenius norm" section below. Instead of arguing who is (in)correct, please explain your notation.
    $endgroup$
    – W-t-P
    Apr 7 at 8:36







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @W-t-P I find your comments towards a new user a bit aggressive. The problem here is that $|A|_2$ is standard notation for two different things, as the Wikipedia page that you linked also notes (if you read a bit earlier, These norms again share the notation with the induced and entrywise p-norms, but they are different, and earlier the definition of the spectral norm). On the other hand, the terms Frobenius norm and spectral norm are unambiguous and look perfectly fine to me as explanations of the notation in OP's question.
    $endgroup$
    – Federico Poloni
    Apr 7 at 12:43













4












4








4





$begingroup$


Let $A$ be a $n times n$ matrix so that the Frobenius norm squared $|A|_F^2$ is $Theta(n)$, the spectral norm squared $|A|_2^2=1$. Is it true that $sum_i=1^nmax_1leq jleq n |A_ij|^2$ is $Omega(n)$? Assume that $n$ is sufficiently large.



I cannot find a relation between matrix norms that can show this. The idea behind this question is that there are many singular values of $A$ that are $Theta(1)$.



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




horxio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Let $A$ be a $n times n$ matrix so that the Frobenius norm squared $|A|_F^2$ is $Theta(n)$, the spectral norm squared $|A|_2^2=1$. Is it true that $sum_i=1^nmax_1leq jleq n |A_ij|^2$ is $Omega(n)$? Assume that $n$ is sufficiently large.



I cannot find a relation between matrix norms that can show this. The idea behind this question is that there are many singular values of $A$ that are $Theta(1)$.



Thanks!







linear-algebra matrices norms






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




horxio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




horxio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 7 at 12:35









Liviu Nicolaescu

25.9k260111




25.9k260111






New contributor




horxio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Apr 7 at 7:24









horxiohorxio

353




353




New contributor




horxio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





horxio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






horxio is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    According to Wikipedia, $|A|_F=|A|_2$. Please, explain your notation!
    $endgroup$
    – W-t-P
    Apr 7 at 8:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Frobenius norm, where did you find that? It is wrong what you are saying.
    $endgroup$
    – horxio
    Apr 7 at 8:14







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What you are saying is incorrect. Can you please tell me where exactly you found this relation? It is wrong that the Frobenius norm is equal to the spectral norm. Think about it, if they were equal, why should we have two definitions? it holds that $||A||_F geq ||A||_2$.
    $endgroup$
    – horxio
    Apr 7 at 8:23






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The last sentence in the ""Entrywise" matrix norms" reads: The special case p = 2 is the Frobenius norm; see also the "Frobenius norm" section below. Instead of arguing who is (in)correct, please explain your notation.
    $endgroup$
    – W-t-P
    Apr 7 at 8:36







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @W-t-P I find your comments towards a new user a bit aggressive. The problem here is that $|A|_2$ is standard notation for two different things, as the Wikipedia page that you linked also notes (if you read a bit earlier, These norms again share the notation with the induced and entrywise p-norms, but they are different, and earlier the definition of the spectral norm). On the other hand, the terms Frobenius norm and spectral norm are unambiguous and look perfectly fine to me as explanations of the notation in OP's question.
    $endgroup$
    – Federico Poloni
    Apr 7 at 12:43












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    According to Wikipedia, $|A|_F=|A|_2$. Please, explain your notation!
    $endgroup$
    – W-t-P
    Apr 7 at 8:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Frobenius norm, where did you find that? It is wrong what you are saying.
    $endgroup$
    – horxio
    Apr 7 at 8:14







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What you are saying is incorrect. Can you please tell me where exactly you found this relation? It is wrong that the Frobenius norm is equal to the spectral norm. Think about it, if they were equal, why should we have two definitions? it holds that $||A||_F geq ||A||_2$.
    $endgroup$
    – horxio
    Apr 7 at 8:23






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The last sentence in the ""Entrywise" matrix norms" reads: The special case p = 2 is the Frobenius norm; see also the "Frobenius norm" section below. Instead of arguing who is (in)correct, please explain your notation.
    $endgroup$
    – W-t-P
    Apr 7 at 8:36







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @W-t-P I find your comments towards a new user a bit aggressive. The problem here is that $|A|_2$ is standard notation for two different things, as the Wikipedia page that you linked also notes (if you read a bit earlier, These norms again share the notation with the induced and entrywise p-norms, but they are different, and earlier the definition of the spectral norm). On the other hand, the terms Frobenius norm and spectral norm are unambiguous and look perfectly fine to me as explanations of the notation in OP's question.
    $endgroup$
    – Federico Poloni
    Apr 7 at 12:43







2




2




$begingroup$
According to Wikipedia, $|A|_F=|A|_2$. Please, explain your notation!
$endgroup$
– W-t-P
Apr 7 at 8:13




$begingroup$
According to Wikipedia, $|A|_F=|A|_2$. Please, explain your notation!
$endgroup$
– W-t-P
Apr 7 at 8:13




1




1




$begingroup$
Frobenius norm, where did you find that? It is wrong what you are saying.
$endgroup$
– horxio
Apr 7 at 8:14





$begingroup$
Frobenius norm, where did you find that? It is wrong what you are saying.
$endgroup$
– horxio
Apr 7 at 8:14





1




1




$begingroup$
What you are saying is incorrect. Can you please tell me where exactly you found this relation? It is wrong that the Frobenius norm is equal to the spectral norm. Think about it, if they were equal, why should we have two definitions? it holds that $||A||_F geq ||A||_2$.
$endgroup$
– horxio
Apr 7 at 8:23




$begingroup$
What you are saying is incorrect. Can you please tell me where exactly you found this relation? It is wrong that the Frobenius norm is equal to the spectral norm. Think about it, if they were equal, why should we have two definitions? it holds that $||A||_F geq ||A||_2$.
$endgroup$
– horxio
Apr 7 at 8:23




2




2




$begingroup$
The last sentence in the ""Entrywise" matrix norms" reads: The special case p = 2 is the Frobenius norm; see also the "Frobenius norm" section below. Instead of arguing who is (in)correct, please explain your notation.
$endgroup$
– W-t-P
Apr 7 at 8:36





$begingroup$
The last sentence in the ""Entrywise" matrix norms" reads: The special case p = 2 is the Frobenius norm; see also the "Frobenius norm" section below. Instead of arguing who is (in)correct, please explain your notation.
$endgroup$
– W-t-P
Apr 7 at 8:36





3




3




$begingroup$
@W-t-P I find your comments towards a new user a bit aggressive. The problem here is that $|A|_2$ is standard notation for two different things, as the Wikipedia page that you linked also notes (if you read a bit earlier, These norms again share the notation with the induced and entrywise p-norms, but they are different, and earlier the definition of the spectral norm). On the other hand, the terms Frobenius norm and spectral norm are unambiguous and look perfectly fine to me as explanations of the notation in OP's question.
$endgroup$
– Federico Poloni
Apr 7 at 12:43




$begingroup$
@W-t-P I find your comments towards a new user a bit aggressive. The problem here is that $|A|_2$ is standard notation for two different things, as the Wikipedia page that you linked also notes (if you read a bit earlier, These norms again share the notation with the induced and entrywise p-norms, but they are different, and earlier the definition of the spectral norm). On the other hand, the terms Frobenius norm and spectral norm are unambiguous and look perfectly fine to me as explanations of the notation in OP's question.
$endgroup$
– Federico Poloni
Apr 7 at 12:43










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

This is false in general, but true for matrices with non-negative entries.



For a counterexample, suppose that $n=p$ is prime, and consider the matrix
$$ A=left|p^-1/2left(fraci-jpright)right|_i,j=0,dotsc,p-1 $$
where $(cdot/p)$ is the Legendre symbol. This is a circulant matrix; its non-zero eigenvalues are normalized Gaussian sums, equal $1$ in absolute value; hence, $|A|_2le 1$. Also, we have $|A|_F^2=p-1$. On the other hand,
$$ sum_i max_j |A_ij|^2 = 1. $$



Suppose now that all elements of $A$ are non-negative. Let $u_iinmathbb R^n$ be the row vectors of $A$, and denote by $|cdot|_p$ the $ell^p$-norm over $mathbb R^n$; when $p=2$, this is the standard Euclidean norm. The Frobenius norm of $A$ is $|A|_F^2=sum_i|u_i|_2^2$. Assuming that $|A|_F^2ge cn$ and $|A|_2^2le C$, we show that $sum_i|u_i|_infty^2ge C^-1c^2n$.



Denoting by $vec 1$ the all-$1$ vector, we have
$$ C ge |A|_2^2 = max_x frac_2^2x ge fracvec 1 = frac1nsum_i |u_i|_1^2. $$
(It is this computation that uses the non-negativeness assumption.) This
implies
$$ sum_i |u_i|_1^2 le Cn $$
and, consequently, by Cauchy-Schwartz,
$$ cn le |A|_F^2 = sum_i |u_i|_2^2 le sum_i |u_i|_infty |u_i|_1 le left( sum_i |u_i|_infty^2right)^1/2 left( sum_i |u_i|_1^2right)^1/2 le
left( Cnsum_i |u_i|_infty^2right)^1/2, $$

which yields the desired estimate
$$ sum_i |u_i|_infty^2 ge C^-1c^2n. $$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "504"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    horxio is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f327382%2frelation-between-frobenius-spectral-norm-and-sum-of-maxima%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    This is false in general, but true for matrices with non-negative entries.



    For a counterexample, suppose that $n=p$ is prime, and consider the matrix
    $$ A=left|p^-1/2left(fraci-jpright)right|_i,j=0,dotsc,p-1 $$
    where $(cdot/p)$ is the Legendre symbol. This is a circulant matrix; its non-zero eigenvalues are normalized Gaussian sums, equal $1$ in absolute value; hence, $|A|_2le 1$. Also, we have $|A|_F^2=p-1$. On the other hand,
    $$ sum_i max_j |A_ij|^2 = 1. $$



    Suppose now that all elements of $A$ are non-negative. Let $u_iinmathbb R^n$ be the row vectors of $A$, and denote by $|cdot|_p$ the $ell^p$-norm over $mathbb R^n$; when $p=2$, this is the standard Euclidean norm. The Frobenius norm of $A$ is $|A|_F^2=sum_i|u_i|_2^2$. Assuming that $|A|_F^2ge cn$ and $|A|_2^2le C$, we show that $sum_i|u_i|_infty^2ge C^-1c^2n$.



    Denoting by $vec 1$ the all-$1$ vector, we have
    $$ C ge |A|_2^2 = max_x frac_2^2x ge fracvec 1 = frac1nsum_i |u_i|_1^2. $$
    (It is this computation that uses the non-negativeness assumption.) This
    implies
    $$ sum_i |u_i|_1^2 le Cn $$
    and, consequently, by Cauchy-Schwartz,
    $$ cn le |A|_F^2 = sum_i |u_i|_2^2 le sum_i |u_i|_infty |u_i|_1 le left( sum_i |u_i|_infty^2right)^1/2 left( sum_i |u_i|_1^2right)^1/2 le
    left( Cnsum_i |u_i|_infty^2right)^1/2, $$

    which yields the desired estimate
    $$ sum_i |u_i|_infty^2 ge C^-1c^2n. $$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      4












      $begingroup$

      This is false in general, but true for matrices with non-negative entries.



      For a counterexample, suppose that $n=p$ is prime, and consider the matrix
      $$ A=left|p^-1/2left(fraci-jpright)right|_i,j=0,dotsc,p-1 $$
      where $(cdot/p)$ is the Legendre symbol. This is a circulant matrix; its non-zero eigenvalues are normalized Gaussian sums, equal $1$ in absolute value; hence, $|A|_2le 1$. Also, we have $|A|_F^2=p-1$. On the other hand,
      $$ sum_i max_j |A_ij|^2 = 1. $$



      Suppose now that all elements of $A$ are non-negative. Let $u_iinmathbb R^n$ be the row vectors of $A$, and denote by $|cdot|_p$ the $ell^p$-norm over $mathbb R^n$; when $p=2$, this is the standard Euclidean norm. The Frobenius norm of $A$ is $|A|_F^2=sum_i|u_i|_2^2$. Assuming that $|A|_F^2ge cn$ and $|A|_2^2le C$, we show that $sum_i|u_i|_infty^2ge C^-1c^2n$.



      Denoting by $vec 1$ the all-$1$ vector, we have
      $$ C ge |A|_2^2 = max_x frac_2^2x ge fracvec 1 = frac1nsum_i |u_i|_1^2. $$
      (It is this computation that uses the non-negativeness assumption.) This
      implies
      $$ sum_i |u_i|_1^2 le Cn $$
      and, consequently, by Cauchy-Schwartz,
      $$ cn le |A|_F^2 = sum_i |u_i|_2^2 le sum_i |u_i|_infty |u_i|_1 le left( sum_i |u_i|_infty^2right)^1/2 left( sum_i |u_i|_1^2right)^1/2 le
      left( Cnsum_i |u_i|_infty^2right)^1/2, $$

      which yields the desired estimate
      $$ sum_i |u_i|_infty^2 ge C^-1c^2n. $$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        This is false in general, but true for matrices with non-negative entries.



        For a counterexample, suppose that $n=p$ is prime, and consider the matrix
        $$ A=left|p^-1/2left(fraci-jpright)right|_i,j=0,dotsc,p-1 $$
        where $(cdot/p)$ is the Legendre symbol. This is a circulant matrix; its non-zero eigenvalues are normalized Gaussian sums, equal $1$ in absolute value; hence, $|A|_2le 1$. Also, we have $|A|_F^2=p-1$. On the other hand,
        $$ sum_i max_j |A_ij|^2 = 1. $$



        Suppose now that all elements of $A$ are non-negative. Let $u_iinmathbb R^n$ be the row vectors of $A$, and denote by $|cdot|_p$ the $ell^p$-norm over $mathbb R^n$; when $p=2$, this is the standard Euclidean norm. The Frobenius norm of $A$ is $|A|_F^2=sum_i|u_i|_2^2$. Assuming that $|A|_F^2ge cn$ and $|A|_2^2le C$, we show that $sum_i|u_i|_infty^2ge C^-1c^2n$.



        Denoting by $vec 1$ the all-$1$ vector, we have
        $$ C ge |A|_2^2 = max_x frac_2^2x ge fracvec 1 = frac1nsum_i |u_i|_1^2. $$
        (It is this computation that uses the non-negativeness assumption.) This
        implies
        $$ sum_i |u_i|_1^2 le Cn $$
        and, consequently, by Cauchy-Schwartz,
        $$ cn le |A|_F^2 = sum_i |u_i|_2^2 le sum_i |u_i|_infty |u_i|_1 le left( sum_i |u_i|_infty^2right)^1/2 left( sum_i |u_i|_1^2right)^1/2 le
        left( Cnsum_i |u_i|_infty^2right)^1/2, $$

        which yields the desired estimate
        $$ sum_i |u_i|_infty^2 ge C^-1c^2n. $$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        This is false in general, but true for matrices with non-negative entries.



        For a counterexample, suppose that $n=p$ is prime, and consider the matrix
        $$ A=left|p^-1/2left(fraci-jpright)right|_i,j=0,dotsc,p-1 $$
        where $(cdot/p)$ is the Legendre symbol. This is a circulant matrix; its non-zero eigenvalues are normalized Gaussian sums, equal $1$ in absolute value; hence, $|A|_2le 1$. Also, we have $|A|_F^2=p-1$. On the other hand,
        $$ sum_i max_j |A_ij|^2 = 1. $$



        Suppose now that all elements of $A$ are non-negative. Let $u_iinmathbb R^n$ be the row vectors of $A$, and denote by $|cdot|_p$ the $ell^p$-norm over $mathbb R^n$; when $p=2$, this is the standard Euclidean norm. The Frobenius norm of $A$ is $|A|_F^2=sum_i|u_i|_2^2$. Assuming that $|A|_F^2ge cn$ and $|A|_2^2le C$, we show that $sum_i|u_i|_infty^2ge C^-1c^2n$.



        Denoting by $vec 1$ the all-$1$ vector, we have
        $$ C ge |A|_2^2 = max_x frac_2^2x ge fracvec 1 = frac1nsum_i |u_i|_1^2. $$
        (It is this computation that uses the non-negativeness assumption.) This
        implies
        $$ sum_i |u_i|_1^2 le Cn $$
        and, consequently, by Cauchy-Schwartz,
        $$ cn le |A|_F^2 = sum_i |u_i|_2^2 le sum_i |u_i|_infty |u_i|_1 le left( sum_i |u_i|_infty^2right)^1/2 left( sum_i |u_i|_1^2right)^1/2 le
        left( Cnsum_i |u_i|_infty^2right)^1/2, $$

        which yields the desired estimate
        $$ sum_i |u_i|_infty^2 ge C^-1c^2n. $$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited yesterday

























        answered Apr 7 at 9:43









        SevaSeva

        12.9k138103




        12.9k138103




















            horxio is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            horxio is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            horxio is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            horxio is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f327382%2frelation-between-frobenius-spectral-norm-and-sum-of-maxima%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Sum ergo cogito? 1 nng

            419 nièngy_Soadمي 19bal1.5o_g

            Queiggey Chernihivv 9NnOo i Zw X QqKk LpB