Lucky Feat: How can “more than one creature spend a luck point to influence the outcome of a roll”?How to make sense of having one's passive Perception better than the active one? (e.g. when one takes the Observant feat)How many luck points does it cost to get a better attack roll with Lucky?Grappled by more than one creature?Do reroll and dice-adding abilities work on critical hits and critical failures?When exactly is the outcome of a roll determined?Can Lucky be used on an attack roll if the roll is a 'Nat 1'?Can you use Lucky (feat) followed by Portent to replace a roll that's already been made?When using the Lucky feat to reroll an attack against me, do I add any modifiers to the reroll?Can you reroll an attack using the Lucky feat if you roll a natural 1?When a player character with the Lucky Feat is attacked, what information is given to the player before deciding to use the feat?

How do conventional missiles fly?

Avoiding the "not like other girls" trope?

Processor speed limited at 0.4 Ghz

How dangerous is XSS

What is the fastest integer factorization to break RSA?

Do creatures with a listed speed of "0 ft., fly 30 ft. (hover)" ever touch the ground?

Different meanings of こわい

Why was Sir Cadogan fired?

Does int main() need a declaration on C++?

my venezuela girlfriend wants to travel the USA where i live.what does she need to do and how expensive will it become or how difficult?

Getting extremely large arrows with tikzcd

Could the museum Saturn V's be refitted for one more flight?

Car headlights in a world without electricity

Knowledge-based authentication using Domain-driven Design in C#

Was the Stack Exchange "Happy April Fools" page fitting with the '90's code?

Why do I get negative height?

How badly should I try to prevent a user from XSSing themselves?

What is required to make GPS signals available indoors?

How to stretch the corners of this image so that it looks like a perfect rectangle?

Does Dispel Magic work on Tiny Hut?

Is it possible to create a QR code using text?

Why didn't Boeing produce its own regional jet?

Implication of namely

Where would I need my direct neural interface to be implanted?



Lucky Feat: How can “more than one creature spend a luck point to influence the outcome of a roll”?


How to make sense of having one's passive Perception better than the active one? (e.g. when one takes the Observant feat)How many luck points does it cost to get a better attack roll with Lucky?Grappled by more than one creature?Do reroll and dice-adding abilities work on critical hits and critical failures?When exactly is the outcome of a roll determined?Can Lucky be used on an attack roll if the roll is a 'Nat 1'?Can you use Lucky (feat) followed by Portent to replace a roll that's already been made?When using the Lucky feat to reroll an attack against me, do I add any modifiers to the reroll?Can you reroll an attack using the Lucky feat if you roll a natural 1?When a player character with the Lucky Feat is attacked, what information is given to the player before deciding to use the feat?













9












$begingroup$


Lucky (PHB, p. 167) is a feat that only targets either you or something that's attacking you. How would there be more than one creature that can manipulate the outcome of the roll?



Is this only referring to if you try to alter an attacker's roll, but they also have Lucky, and they try to change their own roll?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    9












    $begingroup$


    Lucky (PHB, p. 167) is a feat that only targets either you or something that's attacking you. How would there be more than one creature that can manipulate the outcome of the roll?



    Is this only referring to if you try to alter an attacker's roll, but they also have Lucky, and they try to change their own roll?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      9












      9








      9





      $begingroup$


      Lucky (PHB, p. 167) is a feat that only targets either you or something that's attacking you. How would there be more than one creature that can manipulate the outcome of the roll?



      Is this only referring to if you try to alter an attacker's roll, but they also have Lucky, and they try to change their own roll?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Lucky (PHB, p. 167) is a feat that only targets either you or something that's attacking you. How would there be more than one creature that can manipulate the outcome of the roll?



      Is this only referring to if you try to alter an attacker's roll, but they also have Lucky, and they try to change their own roll?







      dnd-5e feats






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago









      V2Blast

      26.1k590159




      26.1k590159










      asked 2 days ago









      guessguess

      42919




      42919




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          13












          $begingroup$

          Yes, it's only for a Lucky attacker and a Lucky target.



          Lucky can benefit one's attack roll, ability check, or saving throw or an incoming attack roll against oneself. The only way a roll could be affected by Lucky from multiple sources is if it's an attack roll, because that's the only sort of roll there that can be manipulated on both ends (source and target).



          If an attacker with the Lucky feat attacks you, they are able to benefit on their own roll yet you're able to benefit against that same roll. This is the only situation that the special canceling rule applies to.



          It is very unlikely the canceling rule will see use at the table since generally only PCs have feats and PCs don't usually attack each other, but the canceling rule is there to handle edge cases. Here are some situations the rule would cover:



          • Two PCs engage in player-versus-player combat.

          • A PC attacks an ally PC who is currently under a mind-control effect that allows a save to end the effect when the target is damaged.

          • An NPC enemy designed with character features attacks a PC.

          • A PC traitor becomes an NPC enemy in the middle of an encounter.

          • A PC applies Lucky to a spell attack against a spectator and misses, and the spectator reflects the spell back at a different PC with the Lucky feat (the spectator's Spell Reflection feature states that the attack is rerolled, so it's the same attack roll that originally benefited from Lucky; the second PC couldn't use Lucky to avoid the reflection).

          There are certainly other edge cases, and the rules for the Lucky feat account for the ambiguity and possible shenanigans by including a fix just in case.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




















            2












            $begingroup$

            You can always target yourself or anyone else that makes an attack roll against you.



            Exactly as it says. You can be "lucky" in two ways:



            • Re-rolling one of your own attacks, ability checks or saving throws and choosing the most favourable

            • When an enemy rolls an attack roll against you, you can force a re-roll and choose the most favourable (the lower roll, or course)

            However, there is an additional clause to account for the unlikely situation when you target another creature attacking you and they also have the lucky feat (or, at least, some way of gaining "luck points"). In this case they can spend one of their points to cancel out your own luck point.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "122"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144217%2flucky-feat-how-can-more-than-one-creature-spend-a-luck-point-to-influence-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              13












              $begingroup$

              Yes, it's only for a Lucky attacker and a Lucky target.



              Lucky can benefit one's attack roll, ability check, or saving throw or an incoming attack roll against oneself. The only way a roll could be affected by Lucky from multiple sources is if it's an attack roll, because that's the only sort of roll there that can be manipulated on both ends (source and target).



              If an attacker with the Lucky feat attacks you, they are able to benefit on their own roll yet you're able to benefit against that same roll. This is the only situation that the special canceling rule applies to.



              It is very unlikely the canceling rule will see use at the table since generally only PCs have feats and PCs don't usually attack each other, but the canceling rule is there to handle edge cases. Here are some situations the rule would cover:



              • Two PCs engage in player-versus-player combat.

              • A PC attacks an ally PC who is currently under a mind-control effect that allows a save to end the effect when the target is damaged.

              • An NPC enemy designed with character features attacks a PC.

              • A PC traitor becomes an NPC enemy in the middle of an encounter.

              • A PC applies Lucky to a spell attack against a spectator and misses, and the spectator reflects the spell back at a different PC with the Lucky feat (the spectator's Spell Reflection feature states that the attack is rerolled, so it's the same attack roll that originally benefited from Lucky; the second PC couldn't use Lucky to avoid the reflection).

              There are certainly other edge cases, and the rules for the Lucky feat account for the ambiguity and possible shenanigans by including a fix just in case.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                13












                $begingroup$

                Yes, it's only for a Lucky attacker and a Lucky target.



                Lucky can benefit one's attack roll, ability check, or saving throw or an incoming attack roll against oneself. The only way a roll could be affected by Lucky from multiple sources is if it's an attack roll, because that's the only sort of roll there that can be manipulated on both ends (source and target).



                If an attacker with the Lucky feat attacks you, they are able to benefit on their own roll yet you're able to benefit against that same roll. This is the only situation that the special canceling rule applies to.



                It is very unlikely the canceling rule will see use at the table since generally only PCs have feats and PCs don't usually attack each other, but the canceling rule is there to handle edge cases. Here are some situations the rule would cover:



                • Two PCs engage in player-versus-player combat.

                • A PC attacks an ally PC who is currently under a mind-control effect that allows a save to end the effect when the target is damaged.

                • An NPC enemy designed with character features attacks a PC.

                • A PC traitor becomes an NPC enemy in the middle of an encounter.

                • A PC applies Lucky to a spell attack against a spectator and misses, and the spectator reflects the spell back at a different PC with the Lucky feat (the spectator's Spell Reflection feature states that the attack is rerolled, so it's the same attack roll that originally benefited from Lucky; the second PC couldn't use Lucky to avoid the reflection).

                There are certainly other edge cases, and the rules for the Lucky feat account for the ambiguity and possible shenanigans by including a fix just in case.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$















                  13












                  13








                  13





                  $begingroup$

                  Yes, it's only for a Lucky attacker and a Lucky target.



                  Lucky can benefit one's attack roll, ability check, or saving throw or an incoming attack roll against oneself. The only way a roll could be affected by Lucky from multiple sources is if it's an attack roll, because that's the only sort of roll there that can be manipulated on both ends (source and target).



                  If an attacker with the Lucky feat attacks you, they are able to benefit on their own roll yet you're able to benefit against that same roll. This is the only situation that the special canceling rule applies to.



                  It is very unlikely the canceling rule will see use at the table since generally only PCs have feats and PCs don't usually attack each other, but the canceling rule is there to handle edge cases. Here are some situations the rule would cover:



                  • Two PCs engage in player-versus-player combat.

                  • A PC attacks an ally PC who is currently under a mind-control effect that allows a save to end the effect when the target is damaged.

                  • An NPC enemy designed with character features attacks a PC.

                  • A PC traitor becomes an NPC enemy in the middle of an encounter.

                  • A PC applies Lucky to a spell attack against a spectator and misses, and the spectator reflects the spell back at a different PC with the Lucky feat (the spectator's Spell Reflection feature states that the attack is rerolled, so it's the same attack roll that originally benefited from Lucky; the second PC couldn't use Lucky to avoid the reflection).

                  There are certainly other edge cases, and the rules for the Lucky feat account for the ambiguity and possible shenanigans by including a fix just in case.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Yes, it's only for a Lucky attacker and a Lucky target.



                  Lucky can benefit one's attack roll, ability check, or saving throw or an incoming attack roll against oneself. The only way a roll could be affected by Lucky from multiple sources is if it's an attack roll, because that's the only sort of roll there that can be manipulated on both ends (source and target).



                  If an attacker with the Lucky feat attacks you, they are able to benefit on their own roll yet you're able to benefit against that same roll. This is the only situation that the special canceling rule applies to.



                  It is very unlikely the canceling rule will see use at the table since generally only PCs have feats and PCs don't usually attack each other, but the canceling rule is there to handle edge cases. Here are some situations the rule would cover:



                  • Two PCs engage in player-versus-player combat.

                  • A PC attacks an ally PC who is currently under a mind-control effect that allows a save to end the effect when the target is damaged.

                  • An NPC enemy designed with character features attacks a PC.

                  • A PC traitor becomes an NPC enemy in the middle of an encounter.

                  • A PC applies Lucky to a spell attack against a spectator and misses, and the spectator reflects the spell back at a different PC with the Lucky feat (the spectator's Spell Reflection feature states that the attack is rerolled, so it's the same attack roll that originally benefited from Lucky; the second PC couldn't use Lucky to avoid the reflection).

                  There are certainly other edge cases, and the rules for the Lucky feat account for the ambiguity and possible shenanigans by including a fix just in case.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited yesterday

























                  answered 2 days ago









                  BloodcinderBloodcinder

                  23.6k385142




                  23.6k385142























                      2












                      $begingroup$

                      You can always target yourself or anyone else that makes an attack roll against you.



                      Exactly as it says. You can be "lucky" in two ways:



                      • Re-rolling one of your own attacks, ability checks or saving throws and choosing the most favourable

                      • When an enemy rolls an attack roll against you, you can force a re-roll and choose the most favourable (the lower roll, or course)

                      However, there is an additional clause to account for the unlikely situation when you target another creature attacking you and they also have the lucky feat (or, at least, some way of gaining "luck points"). In this case they can spend one of their points to cancel out your own luck point.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        You can always target yourself or anyone else that makes an attack roll against you.



                        Exactly as it says. You can be "lucky" in two ways:



                        • Re-rolling one of your own attacks, ability checks or saving throws and choosing the most favourable

                        • When an enemy rolls an attack roll against you, you can force a re-roll and choose the most favourable (the lower roll, or course)

                        However, there is an additional clause to account for the unlikely situation when you target another creature attacking you and they also have the lucky feat (or, at least, some way of gaining "luck points"). In this case they can spend one of their points to cancel out your own luck point.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          2












                          2








                          2





                          $begingroup$

                          You can always target yourself or anyone else that makes an attack roll against you.



                          Exactly as it says. You can be "lucky" in two ways:



                          • Re-rolling one of your own attacks, ability checks or saving throws and choosing the most favourable

                          • When an enemy rolls an attack roll against you, you can force a re-roll and choose the most favourable (the lower roll, or course)

                          However, there is an additional clause to account for the unlikely situation when you target another creature attacking you and they also have the lucky feat (or, at least, some way of gaining "luck points"). In this case they can spend one of their points to cancel out your own luck point.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          You can always target yourself or anyone else that makes an attack roll against you.



                          Exactly as it says. You can be "lucky" in two ways:



                          • Re-rolling one of your own attacks, ability checks or saving throws and choosing the most favourable

                          • When an enemy rolls an attack roll against you, you can force a re-roll and choose the most favourable (the lower roll, or course)

                          However, there is an additional clause to account for the unlikely situation when you target another creature attacking you and they also have the lucky feat (or, at least, some way of gaining "luck points"). In this case they can spend one of their points to cancel out your own luck point.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 2 days ago









                          PJRZPJRZ

                          12.1k13658




                          12.1k13658



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144217%2flucky-feat-how-can-more-than-one-creature-spend-a-luck-point-to-influence-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Sum ergo cogito? 1 nng

                              419 nièngy_Soadمي 19bal1.5o_g

                              Queiggey Chernihivv 9NnOo i Zw X QqKk LpB