Do they change the text of the haggadah in Israel?Why do we sing Chad Gadya and Echad Mi Yodea at the seder?Why is Moshe (mostly) absent from the haggadah?Why does the Hagadda talk about our being slaves now and free next year in Israel?Passover Seder for the infirm. Leniencies?What is mandatory for the second seder?Why is the section of ארמי אובד אבי chosen as the main part of Maggid in the Seder?Why in הא לחמא עניא do we invite people to come to our seder table while the seder is going on?What unifies all the ideas of the הָא לַחְמָא עַנְיָא together?Arabic text chanted by Jo Amar for Yachatz in HaggadahCan one use mongrammed matzot for the Seder?
Why is the sentence "Das ist eine Nase" correct?
Finding the error in an argument
Getting extremely large arrows with tikzcd
how do we prove that a sum of two periods is still a period?
Is there a hemisphere-neutral way of specifying a season?
Can I hook these wires up to find the connection to a dead outlet?
How to find if SQL server backup is encrypted with TDE without restoring the backup
Fair gambler's ruin problem intuition
Implication of namely
Forgetting the musical notes while performing in concert
What is the fastest integer factorization to break RSA?
How can saying a song's name be a copyright violation?
How to Prove P(a) → ∀x(P(x) ∨ ¬(x = a)) using Natural Deduction
How dangerous is XSS
Different meanings of こわい
What is the most common color to indicate the input-field is disabled?
Does int main() need a declaration on C++?
My ex-girlfriend uses my Apple ID to log in to her iPad. Do I have to give her my Apple ID password to reset it?
What reasons are there for a Capitalist to oppose a 100% inheritance tax?
How many wives did king shaul have
Unlock My Phone! February 2018
Sums of two squares in arithmetic progressions
What are the G forces leaving Earth orbit?
How badly should I try to prevent a user from XSSing themselves?
Do they change the text of the haggadah in Israel?
Why do we sing Chad Gadya and Echad Mi Yodea at the seder?Why is Moshe (mostly) absent from the haggadah?Why does the Hagadda talk about our being slaves now and free next year in Israel?Passover Seder for the infirm. Leniencies?What is mandatory for the second seder?Why is the section of ארמי אובד אבי chosen as the main part of Maggid in the Seder?Why in הא לחמא עניא do we invite people to come to our seder table while the seder is going on?What unifies all the ideas of the הָא לַחְמָא עַנְיָא together?Arabic text chanted by Jo Amar for Yachatz in HaggadahCan one use mongrammed matzot for the Seder?
At the seder, we recite Ha Lachma and say: הָשַׁתָּא הָכָא, לְשָׁנָה הַבָּאָה בְּאַרְעָא דְיִשְׂרָאֵל -- This year we are here, next year in the Land of Israel. Do they say that in Israel?
I have no problem with saying "Leshana habba-a birushalayim -- Next year in Jerusalem" in Israel, at the end of the seder, because it means "I hope that next year I will STILL be in Jerusalem." I have a problem with saying, in Israel, "This year we are here, next year in the Land of Israel."
passover-seder-hagada
asked Mar 31 at 2:19
Maurice MizrahiMaurice Mizrahi
2,352315
add a comment |
At the seder, we recite Ha Lachma and say: הָשַׁתָּא הָכָא, לְשָׁנָה הַבָּאָה בְּאַרְעָא דְיִשְׂרָאֵל -- This year we are here, next year in the Land of Israel. Do they say that in Israel?
I have no problem with saying "Leshana habba-a birushalayim -- Next year in Jerusalem" in Israel, at the end of the seder, because it means "I hope that next year I will STILL be in Jerusalem." I have a problem with saying, in Israel, "This year we are here, next year in the Land of Israel."
passover-seder-hagada
asked Mar 31 at 2:19
Maurice MizrahiMaurice Mizrahi
2,352315
5
For Chanukah, “A great miracle happened THERE” is changed to “HERE”.
– JJLL
Mar 31 at 2:41
@JJLL the problem with that is that נגה"ש isn't actually for נס גדול הי׳ שם, rather it's for the Yiddish instructions to play the game: ניכט גאנץ האלב שטעל
– Noach MiFrankfurt
Mar 31 at 4:08
1
I once celebrated the holiday with an otherwise very traditional Algerian Jewish family that ommited the phrase entirely. When I asked why I was told that once the Old City was recaptured in '67 and we were theoretically able to live there again, there was no need to proclaim "Next Year in Jerusalem" anymore
– Josh K
2 days ago
add a comment |
At the seder, we recite Ha Lachma and say: הָשַׁתָּא הָכָא, לְשָׁנָה הַבָּאָה בְּאַרְעָא דְיִשְׂרָאֵל -- This year we are here, next year in the Land of Israel. Do they say that in Israel?
I have no problem with saying "Leshana habba-a birushalayim -- Next year in Jerusalem" in Israel, at the end of the seder, because it means "I hope that next year I will STILL be in Jerusalem." I have a problem with saying, in Israel, "This year we are here, next year in the Land of Israel."
passover-seder-hagada
asked Mar 31 at 2:19
Maurice MizrahiMaurice Mizrahi
2,352315
At the seder, we recite Ha Lachma and say: הָשַׁתָּא הָכָא, לְשָׁנָה הַבָּאָה בְּאַרְעָא דְיִשְׂרָאֵל -- This year we are here, next year in the Land of Israel. Do they say that in Israel?
I have no problem with saying "Leshana habba-a birushalayim -- Next year in Jerusalem" in Israel, at the end of the seder, because it means "I hope that next year I will STILL be in Jerusalem." I have a problem with saying, in Israel, "This year we are here, next year in the Land of Israel."
passover-seder-hagada
passover-seder-hagada
asked Mar 31 at 2:19
Maurice MizrahiMaurice Mizrahi
2,352315
asked Mar 31 at 2:19
Maurice MizrahiMaurice Mizrahi
2,352315
edited 2 days ago
Maurice Mizrahi
asked Mar 31 at 2:19
Maurice MizrahiMaurice Mizrahi
2,352315
asked Mar 31 at 2:19
Maurice MizrahiMaurice Mizrahi
2,352315
asked Mar 31 at 2:19
Maurice MizrahiMaurice Mizrahi
2,352315
2,352315
5
For Chanukah, “A great miracle happened THERE” is changed to “HERE”.
– JJLL
Mar 31 at 2:41
@JJLL the problem with that is that נגה"ש isn't actually for נס גדול הי׳ שם, rather it's for the Yiddish instructions to play the game: ניכט גאנץ האלב שטעל
– Noach MiFrankfurt
Mar 31 at 4:08
1
I once celebrated the holiday with an otherwise very traditional Algerian Jewish family that ommited the phrase entirely. When I asked why I was told that once the Old City was recaptured in '67 and we were theoretically able to live there again, there was no need to proclaim "Next Year in Jerusalem" anymore
– Josh K
2 days ago
add a comment |
5
For Chanukah, “A great miracle happened THERE” is changed to “HERE”.
– JJLL
Mar 31 at 2:41
@JJLL the problem with that is that נגה"ש isn't actually for נס גדול הי׳ שם, rather it's for the Yiddish instructions to play the game: ניכט גאנץ האלב שטעל
– Noach MiFrankfurt
Mar 31 at 4:08
1
I once celebrated the holiday with an otherwise very traditional Algerian Jewish family that ommited the phrase entirely. When I asked why I was told that once the Old City was recaptured in '67 and we were theoretically able to live there again, there was no need to proclaim "Next Year in Jerusalem" anymore
– Josh K
2 days ago
5
5
For Chanukah, “A great miracle happened THERE” is changed to “HERE”.
– JJLL
Mar 31 at 2:41
For Chanukah, “A great miracle happened THERE” is changed to “HERE”.
– JJLL
Mar 31 at 2:41
@JJLL the problem with that is that נגה"ש isn't actually for נס גדול הי׳ שם, rather it's for the Yiddish instructions to play the game: ניכט גאנץ האלב שטעל
– Noach MiFrankfurt
Mar 31 at 4:08
@JJLL the problem with that is that נגה"ש isn't actually for נס גדול הי׳ שם, rather it's for the Yiddish instructions to play the game: ניכט גאנץ האלב שטעל
– Noach MiFrankfurt
Mar 31 at 4:08
1
1
I once celebrated the holiday with an otherwise very traditional Algerian Jewish family that ommited the phrase entirely. When I asked why I was told that once the Old City was recaptured in '67 and we were theoretically able to live there again, there was no need to proclaim "Next Year in Jerusalem" anymore
– Josh K
2 days ago
I once celebrated the holiday with an otherwise very traditional Algerian Jewish family that ommited the phrase entirely. When I asked why I was told that once the Old City was recaptured in '67 and we were theoretically able to live there again, there was no need to proclaim "Next Year in Jerusalem" anymore
– Josh K
2 days ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Many commentaries do not take this at all literally. On that basis saying this phrase in Israel would be as the authors intended, and one would not need to change to another phrase because it wasn’t meant literally.
Ritva interprets this phrase as saying we are now only fulfilling ‘poor mans bread’, next year we will fulfill pesach with all its laws (i.e. the sacrifice etc).
Shiboley Haleket (and Zevach Hapesach) equally hints at this by saying that next year we will perform Pesach properly in Jerusalem. Yaavetz seems to say that being in Israel next year refers to exactly a state in time when we are able to both be in Israel and perform the Pesach sacrifice. Gevuros Hashem adds that although we may be in Israel, since we are still under the rule of others, we cannot build the temple and bring sacrifices, the phrase therefore ends with hope for being free men next year.
answered 2 days ago
Dr. ShmuelDr. Shmuel
4,3791952
2
None of this explains why they don't pick a better phrase nowadays. It just says more than the literal meaning was intended
– Double AA♦
2 days ago
There's no evidence presented that it isn't also meant literally. אין מקרא יוצא מידי פשוטו
– Double AA♦
1 hour ago
@DoubleAA that may be discussed. However, I do know that this book is one of the most commented upon book in Judaism
– Dr. Shmuel
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I think this difficulty is dealt with the same way we view the tefillah of Nacheim on Tisha Bav. While Yerushalayim is technically beautiful today and not in a state of "bezuya" , without the Beis Hamikdash rebuilt it is obviously incomplete and in a state of "destruction". You may be celebrating Pesach in Israel but those words allude to Arah D'Yisrael with the Beis Hamikdash.
answered 8 hours ago
aaronaaron
133
People deal with the old text of Nachem in different ways. Indeed some skip only the words that are definitely lies and leave in the ambiguous words. (Avoiding even a safek lie is a traditional reason to skip non essential additions to the Amida, per the Geonim, Rashi, and the common Ashkenazi practice.)
– Double AA♦
8 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Many commentaries do not take this at all literally. On that basis saying this phrase in Israel would be as the authors intended, and one would not need to change to another phrase because it wasn’t meant literally.
Ritva interprets this phrase as saying we are now only fulfilling ‘poor mans bread’, next year we will fulfill pesach with all its laws (i.e. the sacrifice etc).
Shiboley Haleket (and Zevach Hapesach) equally hints at this by saying that next year we will perform Pesach properly in Jerusalem. Yaavetz seems to say that being in Israel next year refers to exactly a state in time when we are able to both be in Israel and perform the Pesach sacrifice. Gevuros Hashem adds that although we may be in Israel, since we are still under the rule of others, we cannot build the temple and bring sacrifices, the phrase therefore ends with hope for being free men next year.
answered 2 days ago
Dr. ShmuelDr. Shmuel
4,3791952
2
None of this explains why they don't pick a better phrase nowadays. It just says more than the literal meaning was intended
– Double AA♦
2 days ago
There's no evidence presented that it isn't also meant literally. אין מקרא יוצא מידי פשוטו
– Double AA♦
1 hour ago
@DoubleAA that may be discussed. However, I do know that this book is one of the most commented upon book in Judaism
– Dr. Shmuel
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Many commentaries do not take this at all literally. On that basis saying this phrase in Israel would be as the authors intended, and one would not need to change to another phrase because it wasn’t meant literally.
Ritva interprets this phrase as saying we are now only fulfilling ‘poor mans bread’, next year we will fulfill pesach with all its laws (i.e. the sacrifice etc).
Shiboley Haleket (and Zevach Hapesach) equally hints at this by saying that next year we will perform Pesach properly in Jerusalem. Yaavetz seems to say that being in Israel next year refers to exactly a state in time when we are able to both be in Israel and perform the Pesach sacrifice. Gevuros Hashem adds that although we may be in Israel, since we are still under the rule of others, we cannot build the temple and bring sacrifices, the phrase therefore ends with hope for being free men next year.
answered 2 days ago
Dr. ShmuelDr. Shmuel
4,3791952
2
None of this explains why they don't pick a better phrase nowadays. It just says more than the literal meaning was intended
– Double AA♦
2 days ago
There's no evidence presented that it isn't also meant literally. אין מקרא יוצא מידי פשוטו
– Double AA♦
1 hour ago
@DoubleAA that may be discussed. However, I do know that this book is one of the most commented upon book in Judaism
– Dr. Shmuel
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Many commentaries do not take this at all literally. On that basis saying this phrase in Israel would be as the authors intended, and one would not need to change to another phrase because it wasn’t meant literally.
Ritva interprets this phrase as saying we are now only fulfilling ‘poor mans bread’, next year we will fulfill pesach with all its laws (i.e. the sacrifice etc).
Shiboley Haleket (and Zevach Hapesach) equally hints at this by saying that next year we will perform Pesach properly in Jerusalem. Yaavetz seems to say that being in Israel next year refers to exactly a state in time when we are able to both be in Israel and perform the Pesach sacrifice. Gevuros Hashem adds that although we may be in Israel, since we are still under the rule of others, we cannot build the temple and bring sacrifices, the phrase therefore ends with hope for being free men next year.
answered 2 days ago
Dr. ShmuelDr. Shmuel
4,3791952
Many commentaries do not take this at all literally. On that basis saying this phrase in Israel would be as the authors intended, and one would not need to change to another phrase because it wasn’t meant literally.
Ritva interprets this phrase as saying we are now only fulfilling ‘poor mans bread’, next year we will fulfill pesach with all its laws (i.e. the sacrifice etc).
Shiboley Haleket (and Zevach Hapesach) equally hints at this by saying that next year we will perform Pesach properly in Jerusalem. Yaavetz seems to say that being in Israel next year refers to exactly a state in time when we are able to both be in Israel and perform the Pesach sacrifice. Gevuros Hashem adds that although we may be in Israel, since we are still under the rule of others, we cannot build the temple and bring sacrifices, the phrase therefore ends with hope for being free men next year.
answered 2 days ago
Dr. ShmuelDr. Shmuel
4,3791952
edited 1 hour ago
answered 2 days ago
Dr. ShmuelDr. Shmuel
4,3791952
answered 2 days ago
Dr. ShmuelDr. Shmuel
4,3791952
answered 2 days ago
Dr. ShmuelDr. Shmuel
4,3791952
4,3791952
2
None of this explains why they don't pick a better phrase nowadays. It just says more than the literal meaning was intended
– Double AA♦
2 days ago
There's no evidence presented that it isn't also meant literally. אין מקרא יוצא מידי פשוטו
– Double AA♦
1 hour ago
@DoubleAA that may be discussed. However, I do know that this book is one of the most commented upon book in Judaism
– Dr. Shmuel
1 hour ago
add a comment |
2
None of this explains why they don't pick a better phrase nowadays. It just says more than the literal meaning was intended
– Double AA♦
2 days ago
There's no evidence presented that it isn't also meant literally. אין מקרא יוצא מידי פשוטו
– Double AA♦
1 hour ago
@DoubleAA that may be discussed. However, I do know that this book is one of the most commented upon book in Judaism
– Dr. Shmuel
1 hour ago
2
2
None of this explains why they don't pick a better phrase nowadays. It just says more than the literal meaning was intended
– Double AA♦
2 days ago
None of this explains why they don't pick a better phrase nowadays. It just says more than the literal meaning was intended
– Double AA♦
2 days ago
There's no evidence presented that it isn't also meant literally. אין מקרא יוצא מידי פשוטו
– Double AA♦
1 hour ago
There's no evidence presented that it isn't also meant literally. אין מקרא יוצא מידי פשוטו
– Double AA♦
1 hour ago
@DoubleAA that may be discussed. However, I do know that this book is one of the most commented upon book in Judaism
– Dr. Shmuel
1 hour ago
@DoubleAA that may be discussed. However, I do know that this book is one of the most commented upon book in Judaism
– Dr. Shmuel
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I think this difficulty is dealt with the same way we view the tefillah of Nacheim on Tisha Bav. While Yerushalayim is technically beautiful today and not in a state of "bezuya" , without the Beis Hamikdash rebuilt it is obviously incomplete and in a state of "destruction". You may be celebrating Pesach in Israel but those words allude to Arah D'Yisrael with the Beis Hamikdash.
answered 8 hours ago
aaronaaron
133
People deal with the old text of Nachem in different ways. Indeed some skip only the words that are definitely lies and leave in the ambiguous words. (Avoiding even a safek lie is a traditional reason to skip non essential additions to the Amida, per the Geonim, Rashi, and the common Ashkenazi practice.)
– Double AA♦
8 hours ago
add a comment |
I think this difficulty is dealt with the same way we view the tefillah of Nacheim on Tisha Bav. While Yerushalayim is technically beautiful today and not in a state of "bezuya" , without the Beis Hamikdash rebuilt it is obviously incomplete and in a state of "destruction". You may be celebrating Pesach in Israel but those words allude to Arah D'Yisrael with the Beis Hamikdash.
answered 8 hours ago
aaronaaron
133
People deal with the old text of Nachem in different ways. Indeed some skip only the words that are definitely lies and leave in the ambiguous words. (Avoiding even a safek lie is a traditional reason to skip non essential additions to the Amida, per the Geonim, Rashi, and the common Ashkenazi practice.)
– Double AA♦
8 hours ago
add a comment |
I think this difficulty is dealt with the same way we view the tefillah of Nacheim on Tisha Bav. While Yerushalayim is technically beautiful today and not in a state of "bezuya" , without the Beis Hamikdash rebuilt it is obviously incomplete and in a state of "destruction". You may be celebrating Pesach in Israel but those words allude to Arah D'Yisrael with the Beis Hamikdash.
answered 8 hours ago
aaronaaron
133
I think this difficulty is dealt with the same way we view the tefillah of Nacheim on Tisha Bav. While Yerushalayim is technically beautiful today and not in a state of "bezuya" , without the Beis Hamikdash rebuilt it is obviously incomplete and in a state of "destruction". You may be celebrating Pesach in Israel but those words allude to Arah D'Yisrael with the Beis Hamikdash.
answered 8 hours ago
aaronaaron
133
answered 8 hours ago
aaronaaron
133
answered 8 hours ago
aaronaaron
133
answered 8 hours ago
aaronaaron
133
133
People deal with the old text of Nachem in different ways. Indeed some skip only the words that are definitely lies and leave in the ambiguous words. (Avoiding even a safek lie is a traditional reason to skip non essential additions to the Amida, per the Geonim, Rashi, and the common Ashkenazi practice.)
– Double AA♦
8 hours ago
add a comment |
People deal with the old text of Nachem in different ways. Indeed some skip only the words that are definitely lies and leave in the ambiguous words. (Avoiding even a safek lie is a traditional reason to skip non essential additions to the Amida, per the Geonim, Rashi, and the common Ashkenazi practice.)
– Double AA♦
8 hours ago
People deal with the old text of Nachem in different ways. Indeed some skip only the words that are definitely lies and leave in the ambiguous words. (Avoiding even a safek lie is a traditional reason to skip non essential additions to the Amida, per the Geonim, Rashi, and the common Ashkenazi practice.)
– Double AA♦
8 hours ago
People deal with the old text of Nachem in different ways. Indeed some skip only the words that are definitely lies and leave in the ambiguous words. (Avoiding even a safek lie is a traditional reason to skip non essential additions to the Amida, per the Geonim, Rashi, and the common Ashkenazi practice.)
– Double AA♦
8 hours ago
add a comment |
5
For Chanukah, “A great miracle happened THERE” is changed to “HERE”.
– JJLL
Mar 31 at 2:41
@JJLL the problem with that is that נגה"ש isn't actually for נס גדול הי׳ שם, rather it's for the Yiddish instructions to play the game: ניכט גאנץ האלב שטעל
– Noach MiFrankfurt
Mar 31 at 4:08
1
I once celebrated the holiday with an otherwise very traditional Algerian Jewish family that ommited the phrase entirely. When I asked why I was told that once the Old City was recaptured in '67 and we were theoretically able to live there again, there was no need to proclaim "Next Year in Jerusalem" anymore
– Josh K
2 days ago