Can a Cauchy sequence converge for one metric while not converging for another?A “non-trivial” example of a Cauchy sequence that does not converge?How can one know every Cauchy sequence in a complete metric space converges?Does every Cauchy sequence converge in $mathbbC$?Cauchy sequence in vector topological and metric spaceAny Cauchy sequence in the metric space $(Bbb N, d)$ is either “converging” to infinity or ultimately constant.Incomplete metric space or normed space with only one non-convergent Cauchy sequenceConvergent but not Cauchy under two equivalent metricsSequence that is Cauchy, bounded, in a complete metric space but does not converge.Showing a sequence in a metric space is CauchyWhy can't completeness be defined on topological spaces without using metrics?

Can I legally use front facing blue light in the UK?

Pristine Bit Checking

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

extract characters between two commas?

Copycat chess is back

Unbreakable Formation vs. Cry of the Carnarium

Does the average primeness of natural numbers tend to zero?

Extreme, but not acceptable situation and I can't start the work tomorrow morning

Why airport relocation isn't done gradually?

Is there a way to make member function NOT callable from constructor?

"My colleague's body is amazing"

Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?

What do you call something that goes against the spirit of the law, but is legal when interpreting the law to the letter?

How can I add custom success page

Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?

Piano - What is the notation for a double stop where both notes in the double stop are different lengths?

Information to fellow intern about hiring?

Calculate Levenshtein distance between two strings in Python

Eliminate empty elements from a list with a specific pattern

Is it legal to have the "// (c) 2019 John Smith" header in all files when there are hundreds of contributors?

Finding files for which a command fails

I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine

Are cabin dividers used to "hide" the flex of the airplane?

Can the Produce Flame cantrip be used to grapple, or as an unarmed strike, in the right circumstances?



Can a Cauchy sequence converge for one metric while not converging for another?


A “non-trivial” example of a Cauchy sequence that does not converge?How can one know every Cauchy sequence in a complete metric space converges?Does every Cauchy sequence converge in $mathbbC$?Cauchy sequence in vector topological and metric spaceAny Cauchy sequence in the metric space $(Bbb N, d)$ is either “converging” to infinity or ultimately constant.Incomplete metric space or normed space with only one non-convergent Cauchy sequenceConvergent but not Cauchy under two equivalent metricsSequence that is Cauchy, bounded, in a complete metric space but does not converge.Showing a sequence in a metric space is CauchyWhy can't completeness be defined on topological spaces without using metrics?













9












$begingroup$


Is there an easy example of one and the same space $X$ with two different metrics $d$ and $e$ such that one and the same sequence $x_n$ is a Cauchy sequence for both metrics, but converges only for one of them?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




rplantiko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You should define some additional properties you want your metric to have. Otherwise something like "every two different points have distance one" will also work as an example.
    $endgroup$
    – Dirk
    Apr 5 at 7:12










  • $begingroup$
    @Dirk In a discrete space a Cauchy sequence is eventually constant, hence if a Cauchy sequence converges in one discrete metric, it converges in all of them to the same limit. Thus, it will not work as an example.
    $endgroup$
    – uniquesolution
    Apr 5 at 7:14







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @uniquesolution Yeah, but on the other hand, every converging sequence (in whatever metric you like) that doesn't get constant will not converge in a discrete metric.
    $endgroup$
    – Dirk
    Apr 5 at 7:18










  • $begingroup$
    @Dirk, Every convergent sequence is Cauchy in any metric space. Hence in a discrete space every convergent sequence will also get eventually constant. Therefore there is no converging sequence that does not get eventually constant in a discrete space.
    $endgroup$
    – uniquesolution
    Apr 5 at 7:19






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Goblin has an excellent point. You say the "same space $X$". If by "space" you are referring to the topology, not just the set, then the answer is no.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Apr 5 at 16:44















9












$begingroup$


Is there an easy example of one and the same space $X$ with two different metrics $d$ and $e$ such that one and the same sequence $x_n$ is a Cauchy sequence for both metrics, but converges only for one of them?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




rplantiko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You should define some additional properties you want your metric to have. Otherwise something like "every two different points have distance one" will also work as an example.
    $endgroup$
    – Dirk
    Apr 5 at 7:12










  • $begingroup$
    @Dirk In a discrete space a Cauchy sequence is eventually constant, hence if a Cauchy sequence converges in one discrete metric, it converges in all of them to the same limit. Thus, it will not work as an example.
    $endgroup$
    – uniquesolution
    Apr 5 at 7:14







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @uniquesolution Yeah, but on the other hand, every converging sequence (in whatever metric you like) that doesn't get constant will not converge in a discrete metric.
    $endgroup$
    – Dirk
    Apr 5 at 7:18










  • $begingroup$
    @Dirk, Every convergent sequence is Cauchy in any metric space. Hence in a discrete space every convergent sequence will also get eventually constant. Therefore there is no converging sequence that does not get eventually constant in a discrete space.
    $endgroup$
    – uniquesolution
    Apr 5 at 7:19






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Goblin has an excellent point. You say the "same space $X$". If by "space" you are referring to the topology, not just the set, then the answer is no.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Apr 5 at 16:44













9












9








9


2



$begingroup$


Is there an easy example of one and the same space $X$ with two different metrics $d$ and $e$ such that one and the same sequence $x_n$ is a Cauchy sequence for both metrics, but converges only for one of them?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




rplantiko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




Is there an easy example of one and the same space $X$ with two different metrics $d$ and $e$ such that one and the same sequence $x_n$ is a Cauchy sequence for both metrics, but converges only for one of them?







convergence metric-spaces cauchy-sequences






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




rplantiko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




rplantiko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 5 at 7:23









José Carlos Santos

173k23133241




173k23133241






New contributor




rplantiko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Apr 5 at 6:56









rplantikorplantiko

1605




1605




New contributor




rplantiko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





rplantiko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






rplantiko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You should define some additional properties you want your metric to have. Otherwise something like "every two different points have distance one" will also work as an example.
    $endgroup$
    – Dirk
    Apr 5 at 7:12










  • $begingroup$
    @Dirk In a discrete space a Cauchy sequence is eventually constant, hence if a Cauchy sequence converges in one discrete metric, it converges in all of them to the same limit. Thus, it will not work as an example.
    $endgroup$
    – uniquesolution
    Apr 5 at 7:14







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @uniquesolution Yeah, but on the other hand, every converging sequence (in whatever metric you like) that doesn't get constant will not converge in a discrete metric.
    $endgroup$
    – Dirk
    Apr 5 at 7:18










  • $begingroup$
    @Dirk, Every convergent sequence is Cauchy in any metric space. Hence in a discrete space every convergent sequence will also get eventually constant. Therefore there is no converging sequence that does not get eventually constant in a discrete space.
    $endgroup$
    – uniquesolution
    Apr 5 at 7:19






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Goblin has an excellent point. You say the "same space $X$". If by "space" you are referring to the topology, not just the set, then the answer is no.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Apr 5 at 16:44












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You should define some additional properties you want your metric to have. Otherwise something like "every two different points have distance one" will also work as an example.
    $endgroup$
    – Dirk
    Apr 5 at 7:12










  • $begingroup$
    @Dirk In a discrete space a Cauchy sequence is eventually constant, hence if a Cauchy sequence converges in one discrete metric, it converges in all of them to the same limit. Thus, it will not work as an example.
    $endgroup$
    – uniquesolution
    Apr 5 at 7:14







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @uniquesolution Yeah, but on the other hand, every converging sequence (in whatever metric you like) that doesn't get constant will not converge in a discrete metric.
    $endgroup$
    – Dirk
    Apr 5 at 7:18










  • $begingroup$
    @Dirk, Every convergent sequence is Cauchy in any metric space. Hence in a discrete space every convergent sequence will also get eventually constant. Therefore there is no converging sequence that does not get eventually constant in a discrete space.
    $endgroup$
    – uniquesolution
    Apr 5 at 7:19






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Goblin has an excellent point. You say the "same space $X$". If by "space" you are referring to the topology, not just the set, then the answer is no.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Apr 5 at 16:44







1




1




$begingroup$
You should define some additional properties you want your metric to have. Otherwise something like "every two different points have distance one" will also work as an example.
$endgroup$
– Dirk
Apr 5 at 7:12




$begingroup$
You should define some additional properties you want your metric to have. Otherwise something like "every two different points have distance one" will also work as an example.
$endgroup$
– Dirk
Apr 5 at 7:12












$begingroup$
@Dirk In a discrete space a Cauchy sequence is eventually constant, hence if a Cauchy sequence converges in one discrete metric, it converges in all of them to the same limit. Thus, it will not work as an example.
$endgroup$
– uniquesolution
Apr 5 at 7:14





$begingroup$
@Dirk In a discrete space a Cauchy sequence is eventually constant, hence if a Cauchy sequence converges in one discrete metric, it converges in all of them to the same limit. Thus, it will not work as an example.
$endgroup$
– uniquesolution
Apr 5 at 7:14





1




1




$begingroup$
@uniquesolution Yeah, but on the other hand, every converging sequence (in whatever metric you like) that doesn't get constant will not converge in a discrete metric.
$endgroup$
– Dirk
Apr 5 at 7:18




$begingroup$
@uniquesolution Yeah, but on the other hand, every converging sequence (in whatever metric you like) that doesn't get constant will not converge in a discrete metric.
$endgroup$
– Dirk
Apr 5 at 7:18












$begingroup$
@Dirk, Every convergent sequence is Cauchy in any metric space. Hence in a discrete space every convergent sequence will also get eventually constant. Therefore there is no converging sequence that does not get eventually constant in a discrete space.
$endgroup$
– uniquesolution
Apr 5 at 7:19




$begingroup$
@Dirk, Every convergent sequence is Cauchy in any metric space. Hence in a discrete space every convergent sequence will also get eventually constant. Therefore there is no converging sequence that does not get eventually constant in a discrete space.
$endgroup$
– uniquesolution
Apr 5 at 7:19




3




3




$begingroup$
Goblin has an excellent point. You say the "same space $X$". If by "space" you are referring to the topology, not just the set, then the answer is no.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Apr 5 at 16:44




$begingroup$
Goblin has an excellent point. You say the "same space $X$". If by "space" you are referring to the topology, not just the set, then the answer is no.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Apr 5 at 16:44










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















21












$begingroup$

Take $X=[0,infty)$, let $d(x,y)=lvert x-yrvert$ and let$$e(x,y)=begincaseslvert x-yrvert&text if x,yneq0\lvert x+1rvert&text if xneq0text and y=0\lvert y+1rvert&text if x=0text and yneq0\0&text if x,y=0.endcases$$Then $left(frac1nright)_ninmathbb N$ is a Cauchy sequence with respect to both metrics, but it is convergent only in $(X,d)$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Is there a reason this example needs to use $X = [0, infty)$ rather than $X = mathbbR$?
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    Apr 5 at 12:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If, in my answer, you work with $mathbb R$ instead of $[0,infty)$, then $e$ will not be a distance, because then $e(0,-1)=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Apr 5 at 12:47










  • $begingroup$
    The second metric basically makes it $-1cup (0,infty)$, which can't really be said to be a metric for the same space.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Apr 5 at 23:57






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @MattSamuel That seems like an easier way to define this function. Let $f(0)=-1$ and $f(x)=x$ for $x>0$, and define $e(x,y)=|f(x)-f(y)|$. This is a metric because $f$ is injective.
    $endgroup$
    – Mario Carneiro
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    For $X = mathbbR$, one could use $e(0,x)=e(x,0)=|x|+1$ when $xneq 0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Litho
    2 days ago


















16












$begingroup$

You can always have some artificial example where you just "move the limit elsewhere". For example, let $X=mathbbR_ge 0$, $d_1$ be the Euclidean metric and $d_2(x, y)=|hatx-haty|$, where $ hatx=-1$ if $x=0$ and $ hatx=x$ otherwise. Then the sequence $x_n=frac 1n$ converges in $(X, d_1)$ but not in $(X, d_2)$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Is this somehow a standard example? Since you other poster also jsed it? Which book is it from
    $endgroup$
    – lalala
    Apr 5 at 18:50






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    AFAIK, this isn't from some standard reference (at least I didn't refer to one). I guess that's just a coincidence. After all, $x_n=frac 1n$ is often the first (non-trivial) convergent sequence when you are asked to think of one and moving $0$ to $-1$ just seems like a natural thing to do if you have to move $0$ away
    $endgroup$
    – Poon Levi
    Apr 5 at 21:25










  • $begingroup$
    But how did you see immediately that this metric is a metric? (Maybe its obvious if one has a geometric interpretation like you seem to have). Triangular inequality doesnt seem obvious to me.
    $endgroup$
    – lalala
    2 days ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $d_2$ is essentially the Euclidean metric on a new set $-1cup(0,infty)$. But since we can't change the base set, we instead use a map $xmapstohatx$ to rename $0$ to $-1$.
    $endgroup$
    – Poon Levi
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! Yes. It is just a renameing. (I am not so used to metrics which do not derive from a norm)
    $endgroup$
    – lalala
    2 days ago


















9












$begingroup$

Depending on what you mean, the answer is "no". In particular, if by "two metrics on the one space" you mean two metrics on the same set that induce the same topology, then the answer is no because convergence is a topological property.



However the other answers are correct if the induced topologies are allowed to be different.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    8












    $begingroup$

    Having "the same X" is somewhat meaningless, since there's no shared structure other than cardinality. Given any other set Y with metric $d_Y$ and a injective map $phi: X rightarrow Y$, you can define $e(x_1,x_2) = d_Y(phi(x_1),phi(x_2))$. So all you have to do is find two spaces with the same cardinality where one has a convergent Cauchy sequence and the other has a non-convergent one. Or find a convergent Cauchy sequence and a non-convergent Cauchy sequence in the same space, then map one sequence to the other.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      rplantiko is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3175604%2fcan-a-cauchy-sequence-converge-for-one-metric-while-not-converging-for-another%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      21












      $begingroup$

      Take $X=[0,infty)$, let $d(x,y)=lvert x-yrvert$ and let$$e(x,y)=begincaseslvert x-yrvert&text if x,yneq0\lvert x+1rvert&text if xneq0text and y=0\lvert y+1rvert&text if x=0text and yneq0\0&text if x,y=0.endcases$$Then $left(frac1nright)_ninmathbb N$ is a Cauchy sequence with respect to both metrics, but it is convergent only in $(X,d)$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Is there a reason this example needs to use $X = [0, infty)$ rather than $X = mathbbR$?
        $endgroup$
        – Michael Seifert
        Apr 5 at 12:13






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        If, in my answer, you work with $mathbb R$ instead of $[0,infty)$, then $e$ will not be a distance, because then $e(0,-1)=0$.
        $endgroup$
        – José Carlos Santos
        Apr 5 at 12:47










      • $begingroup$
        The second metric basically makes it $-1cup (0,infty)$, which can't really be said to be a metric for the same space.
        $endgroup$
        – Matt Samuel
        Apr 5 at 23:57






      • 3




        $begingroup$
        @MattSamuel That seems like an easier way to define this function. Let $f(0)=-1$ and $f(x)=x$ for $x>0$, and define $e(x,y)=|f(x)-f(y)|$. This is a metric because $f$ is injective.
        $endgroup$
        – Mario Carneiro
        2 days ago










      • $begingroup$
        For $X = mathbbR$, one could use $e(0,x)=e(x,0)=|x|+1$ when $xneq 0$.
        $endgroup$
        – Litho
        2 days ago















      21












      $begingroup$

      Take $X=[0,infty)$, let $d(x,y)=lvert x-yrvert$ and let$$e(x,y)=begincaseslvert x-yrvert&text if x,yneq0\lvert x+1rvert&text if xneq0text and y=0\lvert y+1rvert&text if x=0text and yneq0\0&text if x,y=0.endcases$$Then $left(frac1nright)_ninmathbb N$ is a Cauchy sequence with respect to both metrics, but it is convergent only in $(X,d)$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Is there a reason this example needs to use $X = [0, infty)$ rather than $X = mathbbR$?
        $endgroup$
        – Michael Seifert
        Apr 5 at 12:13






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        If, in my answer, you work with $mathbb R$ instead of $[0,infty)$, then $e$ will not be a distance, because then $e(0,-1)=0$.
        $endgroup$
        – José Carlos Santos
        Apr 5 at 12:47










      • $begingroup$
        The second metric basically makes it $-1cup (0,infty)$, which can't really be said to be a metric for the same space.
        $endgroup$
        – Matt Samuel
        Apr 5 at 23:57






      • 3




        $begingroup$
        @MattSamuel That seems like an easier way to define this function. Let $f(0)=-1$ and $f(x)=x$ for $x>0$, and define $e(x,y)=|f(x)-f(y)|$. This is a metric because $f$ is injective.
        $endgroup$
        – Mario Carneiro
        2 days ago










      • $begingroup$
        For $X = mathbbR$, one could use $e(0,x)=e(x,0)=|x|+1$ when $xneq 0$.
        $endgroup$
        – Litho
        2 days ago













      21












      21








      21





      $begingroup$

      Take $X=[0,infty)$, let $d(x,y)=lvert x-yrvert$ and let$$e(x,y)=begincaseslvert x-yrvert&text if x,yneq0\lvert x+1rvert&text if xneq0text and y=0\lvert y+1rvert&text if x=0text and yneq0\0&text if x,y=0.endcases$$Then $left(frac1nright)_ninmathbb N$ is a Cauchy sequence with respect to both metrics, but it is convergent only in $(X,d)$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      Take $X=[0,infty)$, let $d(x,y)=lvert x-yrvert$ and let$$e(x,y)=begincaseslvert x-yrvert&text if x,yneq0\lvert x+1rvert&text if xneq0text and y=0\lvert y+1rvert&text if x=0text and yneq0\0&text if x,y=0.endcases$$Then $left(frac1nright)_ninmathbb N$ is a Cauchy sequence with respect to both metrics, but it is convergent only in $(X,d)$.







      share|cite|improve this answer












      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer










      answered Apr 5 at 7:11









      José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

      173k23133241




      173k23133241











      • $begingroup$
        Is there a reason this example needs to use $X = [0, infty)$ rather than $X = mathbbR$?
        $endgroup$
        – Michael Seifert
        Apr 5 at 12:13






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        If, in my answer, you work with $mathbb R$ instead of $[0,infty)$, then $e$ will not be a distance, because then $e(0,-1)=0$.
        $endgroup$
        – José Carlos Santos
        Apr 5 at 12:47










      • $begingroup$
        The second metric basically makes it $-1cup (0,infty)$, which can't really be said to be a metric for the same space.
        $endgroup$
        – Matt Samuel
        Apr 5 at 23:57






      • 3




        $begingroup$
        @MattSamuel That seems like an easier way to define this function. Let $f(0)=-1$ and $f(x)=x$ for $x>0$, and define $e(x,y)=|f(x)-f(y)|$. This is a metric because $f$ is injective.
        $endgroup$
        – Mario Carneiro
        2 days ago










      • $begingroup$
        For $X = mathbbR$, one could use $e(0,x)=e(x,0)=|x|+1$ when $xneq 0$.
        $endgroup$
        – Litho
        2 days ago
















      • $begingroup$
        Is there a reason this example needs to use $X = [0, infty)$ rather than $X = mathbbR$?
        $endgroup$
        – Michael Seifert
        Apr 5 at 12:13






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        If, in my answer, you work with $mathbb R$ instead of $[0,infty)$, then $e$ will not be a distance, because then $e(0,-1)=0$.
        $endgroup$
        – José Carlos Santos
        Apr 5 at 12:47










      • $begingroup$
        The second metric basically makes it $-1cup (0,infty)$, which can't really be said to be a metric for the same space.
        $endgroup$
        – Matt Samuel
        Apr 5 at 23:57






      • 3




        $begingroup$
        @MattSamuel That seems like an easier way to define this function. Let $f(0)=-1$ and $f(x)=x$ for $x>0$, and define $e(x,y)=|f(x)-f(y)|$. This is a metric because $f$ is injective.
        $endgroup$
        – Mario Carneiro
        2 days ago










      • $begingroup$
        For $X = mathbbR$, one could use $e(0,x)=e(x,0)=|x|+1$ when $xneq 0$.
        $endgroup$
        – Litho
        2 days ago















      $begingroup$
      Is there a reason this example needs to use $X = [0, infty)$ rather than $X = mathbbR$?
      $endgroup$
      – Michael Seifert
      Apr 5 at 12:13




      $begingroup$
      Is there a reason this example needs to use $X = [0, infty)$ rather than $X = mathbbR$?
      $endgroup$
      – Michael Seifert
      Apr 5 at 12:13




      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      If, in my answer, you work with $mathbb R$ instead of $[0,infty)$, then $e$ will not be a distance, because then $e(0,-1)=0$.
      $endgroup$
      – José Carlos Santos
      Apr 5 at 12:47




      $begingroup$
      If, in my answer, you work with $mathbb R$ instead of $[0,infty)$, then $e$ will not be a distance, because then $e(0,-1)=0$.
      $endgroup$
      – José Carlos Santos
      Apr 5 at 12:47












      $begingroup$
      The second metric basically makes it $-1cup (0,infty)$, which can't really be said to be a metric for the same space.
      $endgroup$
      – Matt Samuel
      Apr 5 at 23:57




      $begingroup$
      The second metric basically makes it $-1cup (0,infty)$, which can't really be said to be a metric for the same space.
      $endgroup$
      – Matt Samuel
      Apr 5 at 23:57




      3




      3




      $begingroup$
      @MattSamuel That seems like an easier way to define this function. Let $f(0)=-1$ and $f(x)=x$ for $x>0$, and define $e(x,y)=|f(x)-f(y)|$. This is a metric because $f$ is injective.
      $endgroup$
      – Mario Carneiro
      2 days ago




      $begingroup$
      @MattSamuel That seems like an easier way to define this function. Let $f(0)=-1$ and $f(x)=x$ for $x>0$, and define $e(x,y)=|f(x)-f(y)|$. This is a metric because $f$ is injective.
      $endgroup$
      – Mario Carneiro
      2 days ago












      $begingroup$
      For $X = mathbbR$, one could use $e(0,x)=e(x,0)=|x|+1$ when $xneq 0$.
      $endgroup$
      – Litho
      2 days ago




      $begingroup$
      For $X = mathbbR$, one could use $e(0,x)=e(x,0)=|x|+1$ when $xneq 0$.
      $endgroup$
      – Litho
      2 days ago











      16












      $begingroup$

      You can always have some artificial example where you just "move the limit elsewhere". For example, let $X=mathbbR_ge 0$, $d_1$ be the Euclidean metric and $d_2(x, y)=|hatx-haty|$, where $ hatx=-1$ if $x=0$ and $ hatx=x$ otherwise. Then the sequence $x_n=frac 1n$ converges in $(X, d_1)$ but not in $(X, d_2)$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Is this somehow a standard example? Since you other poster also jsed it? Which book is it from
        $endgroup$
        – lalala
        Apr 5 at 18:50






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        AFAIK, this isn't from some standard reference (at least I didn't refer to one). I guess that's just a coincidence. After all, $x_n=frac 1n$ is often the first (non-trivial) convergent sequence when you are asked to think of one and moving $0$ to $-1$ just seems like a natural thing to do if you have to move $0$ away
        $endgroup$
        – Poon Levi
        Apr 5 at 21:25










      • $begingroup$
        But how did you see immediately that this metric is a metric? (Maybe its obvious if one has a geometric interpretation like you seem to have). Triangular inequality doesnt seem obvious to me.
        $endgroup$
        – lalala
        2 days ago







      • 1




        $begingroup$
        $d_2$ is essentially the Euclidean metric on a new set $-1cup(0,infty)$. But since we can't change the base set, we instead use a map $xmapstohatx$ to rename $0$ to $-1$.
        $endgroup$
        – Poon Levi
        2 days ago










      • $begingroup$
        Thanks! Yes. It is just a renameing. (I am not so used to metrics which do not derive from a norm)
        $endgroup$
        – lalala
        2 days ago















      16












      $begingroup$

      You can always have some artificial example where you just "move the limit elsewhere". For example, let $X=mathbbR_ge 0$, $d_1$ be the Euclidean metric and $d_2(x, y)=|hatx-haty|$, where $ hatx=-1$ if $x=0$ and $ hatx=x$ otherwise. Then the sequence $x_n=frac 1n$ converges in $(X, d_1)$ but not in $(X, d_2)$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Is this somehow a standard example? Since you other poster also jsed it? Which book is it from
        $endgroup$
        – lalala
        Apr 5 at 18:50






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        AFAIK, this isn't from some standard reference (at least I didn't refer to one). I guess that's just a coincidence. After all, $x_n=frac 1n$ is often the first (non-trivial) convergent sequence when you are asked to think of one and moving $0$ to $-1$ just seems like a natural thing to do if you have to move $0$ away
        $endgroup$
        – Poon Levi
        Apr 5 at 21:25










      • $begingroup$
        But how did you see immediately that this metric is a metric? (Maybe its obvious if one has a geometric interpretation like you seem to have). Triangular inequality doesnt seem obvious to me.
        $endgroup$
        – lalala
        2 days ago







      • 1




        $begingroup$
        $d_2$ is essentially the Euclidean metric on a new set $-1cup(0,infty)$. But since we can't change the base set, we instead use a map $xmapstohatx$ to rename $0$ to $-1$.
        $endgroup$
        – Poon Levi
        2 days ago










      • $begingroup$
        Thanks! Yes. It is just a renameing. (I am not so used to metrics which do not derive from a norm)
        $endgroup$
        – lalala
        2 days ago













      16












      16








      16





      $begingroup$

      You can always have some artificial example where you just "move the limit elsewhere". For example, let $X=mathbbR_ge 0$, $d_1$ be the Euclidean metric and $d_2(x, y)=|hatx-haty|$, where $ hatx=-1$ if $x=0$ and $ hatx=x$ otherwise. Then the sequence $x_n=frac 1n$ converges in $(X, d_1)$ but not in $(X, d_2)$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      You can always have some artificial example where you just "move the limit elsewhere". For example, let $X=mathbbR_ge 0$, $d_1$ be the Euclidean metric and $d_2(x, y)=|hatx-haty|$, where $ hatx=-1$ if $x=0$ and $ hatx=x$ otherwise. Then the sequence $x_n=frac 1n$ converges in $(X, d_1)$ but not in $(X, d_2)$.







      share|cite|improve this answer












      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer










      answered Apr 5 at 7:32









      Poon LeviPoon Levi

      70139




      70139











      • $begingroup$
        Is this somehow a standard example? Since you other poster also jsed it? Which book is it from
        $endgroup$
        – lalala
        Apr 5 at 18:50






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        AFAIK, this isn't from some standard reference (at least I didn't refer to one). I guess that's just a coincidence. After all, $x_n=frac 1n$ is often the first (non-trivial) convergent sequence when you are asked to think of one and moving $0$ to $-1$ just seems like a natural thing to do if you have to move $0$ away
        $endgroup$
        – Poon Levi
        Apr 5 at 21:25










      • $begingroup$
        But how did you see immediately that this metric is a metric? (Maybe its obvious if one has a geometric interpretation like you seem to have). Triangular inequality doesnt seem obvious to me.
        $endgroup$
        – lalala
        2 days ago







      • 1




        $begingroup$
        $d_2$ is essentially the Euclidean metric on a new set $-1cup(0,infty)$. But since we can't change the base set, we instead use a map $xmapstohatx$ to rename $0$ to $-1$.
        $endgroup$
        – Poon Levi
        2 days ago










      • $begingroup$
        Thanks! Yes. It is just a renameing. (I am not so used to metrics which do not derive from a norm)
        $endgroup$
        – lalala
        2 days ago
















      • $begingroup$
        Is this somehow a standard example? Since you other poster also jsed it? Which book is it from
        $endgroup$
        – lalala
        Apr 5 at 18:50






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        AFAIK, this isn't from some standard reference (at least I didn't refer to one). I guess that's just a coincidence. After all, $x_n=frac 1n$ is often the first (non-trivial) convergent sequence when you are asked to think of one and moving $0$ to $-1$ just seems like a natural thing to do if you have to move $0$ away
        $endgroup$
        – Poon Levi
        Apr 5 at 21:25










      • $begingroup$
        But how did you see immediately that this metric is a metric? (Maybe its obvious if one has a geometric interpretation like you seem to have). Triangular inequality doesnt seem obvious to me.
        $endgroup$
        – lalala
        2 days ago







      • 1




        $begingroup$
        $d_2$ is essentially the Euclidean metric on a new set $-1cup(0,infty)$. But since we can't change the base set, we instead use a map $xmapstohatx$ to rename $0$ to $-1$.
        $endgroup$
        – Poon Levi
        2 days ago










      • $begingroup$
        Thanks! Yes. It is just a renameing. (I am not so used to metrics which do not derive from a norm)
        $endgroup$
        – lalala
        2 days ago















      $begingroup$
      Is this somehow a standard example? Since you other poster also jsed it? Which book is it from
      $endgroup$
      – lalala
      Apr 5 at 18:50




      $begingroup$
      Is this somehow a standard example? Since you other poster also jsed it? Which book is it from
      $endgroup$
      – lalala
      Apr 5 at 18:50




      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      AFAIK, this isn't from some standard reference (at least I didn't refer to one). I guess that's just a coincidence. After all, $x_n=frac 1n$ is often the first (non-trivial) convergent sequence when you are asked to think of one and moving $0$ to $-1$ just seems like a natural thing to do if you have to move $0$ away
      $endgroup$
      – Poon Levi
      Apr 5 at 21:25




      $begingroup$
      AFAIK, this isn't from some standard reference (at least I didn't refer to one). I guess that's just a coincidence. After all, $x_n=frac 1n$ is often the first (non-trivial) convergent sequence when you are asked to think of one and moving $0$ to $-1$ just seems like a natural thing to do if you have to move $0$ away
      $endgroup$
      – Poon Levi
      Apr 5 at 21:25












      $begingroup$
      But how did you see immediately that this metric is a metric? (Maybe its obvious if one has a geometric interpretation like you seem to have). Triangular inequality doesnt seem obvious to me.
      $endgroup$
      – lalala
      2 days ago





      $begingroup$
      But how did you see immediately that this metric is a metric? (Maybe its obvious if one has a geometric interpretation like you seem to have). Triangular inequality doesnt seem obvious to me.
      $endgroup$
      – lalala
      2 days ago





      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      $d_2$ is essentially the Euclidean metric on a new set $-1cup(0,infty)$. But since we can't change the base set, we instead use a map $xmapstohatx$ to rename $0$ to $-1$.
      $endgroup$
      – Poon Levi
      2 days ago




      $begingroup$
      $d_2$ is essentially the Euclidean metric on a new set $-1cup(0,infty)$. But since we can't change the base set, we instead use a map $xmapstohatx$ to rename $0$ to $-1$.
      $endgroup$
      – Poon Levi
      2 days ago












      $begingroup$
      Thanks! Yes. It is just a renameing. (I am not so used to metrics which do not derive from a norm)
      $endgroup$
      – lalala
      2 days ago




      $begingroup$
      Thanks! Yes. It is just a renameing. (I am not so used to metrics which do not derive from a norm)
      $endgroup$
      – lalala
      2 days ago











      9












      $begingroup$

      Depending on what you mean, the answer is "no". In particular, if by "two metrics on the one space" you mean two metrics on the same set that induce the same topology, then the answer is no because convergence is a topological property.



      However the other answers are correct if the induced topologies are allowed to be different.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        9












        $begingroup$

        Depending on what you mean, the answer is "no". In particular, if by "two metrics on the one space" you mean two metrics on the same set that induce the same topology, then the answer is no because convergence is a topological property.



        However the other answers are correct if the induced topologies are allowed to be different.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          9












          9








          9





          $begingroup$

          Depending on what you mean, the answer is "no". In particular, if by "two metrics on the one space" you mean two metrics on the same set that induce the same topology, then the answer is no because convergence is a topological property.



          However the other answers are correct if the induced topologies are allowed to be different.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Depending on what you mean, the answer is "no". In particular, if by "two metrics on the one space" you mean two metrics on the same set that induce the same topology, then the answer is no because convergence is a topological property.



          However the other answers are correct if the induced topologies are allowed to be different.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Apr 5 at 13:26









          goblingoblin

          37.1k1159194




          37.1k1159194





















              8












              $begingroup$

              Having "the same X" is somewhat meaningless, since there's no shared structure other than cardinality. Given any other set Y with metric $d_Y$ and a injective map $phi: X rightarrow Y$, you can define $e(x_1,x_2) = d_Y(phi(x_1),phi(x_2))$. So all you have to do is find two spaces with the same cardinality where one has a convergent Cauchy sequence and the other has a non-convergent one. Or find a convergent Cauchy sequence and a non-convergent Cauchy sequence in the same space, then map one sequence to the other.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                8












                $begingroup$

                Having "the same X" is somewhat meaningless, since there's no shared structure other than cardinality. Given any other set Y with metric $d_Y$ and a injective map $phi: X rightarrow Y$, you can define $e(x_1,x_2) = d_Y(phi(x_1),phi(x_2))$. So all you have to do is find two spaces with the same cardinality where one has a convergent Cauchy sequence and the other has a non-convergent one. Or find a convergent Cauchy sequence and a non-convergent Cauchy sequence in the same space, then map one sequence to the other.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  8












                  8








                  8





                  $begingroup$

                  Having "the same X" is somewhat meaningless, since there's no shared structure other than cardinality. Given any other set Y with metric $d_Y$ and a injective map $phi: X rightarrow Y$, you can define $e(x_1,x_2) = d_Y(phi(x_1),phi(x_2))$. So all you have to do is find two spaces with the same cardinality where one has a convergent Cauchy sequence and the other has a non-convergent one. Or find a convergent Cauchy sequence and a non-convergent Cauchy sequence in the same space, then map one sequence to the other.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Having "the same X" is somewhat meaningless, since there's no shared structure other than cardinality. Given any other set Y with metric $d_Y$ and a injective map $phi: X rightarrow Y$, you can define $e(x_1,x_2) = d_Y(phi(x_1),phi(x_2))$. So all you have to do is find two spaces with the same cardinality where one has a convergent Cauchy sequence and the other has a non-convergent one. Or find a convergent Cauchy sequence and a non-convergent Cauchy sequence in the same space, then map one sequence to the other.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 5 at 16:50









                  AcccumulationAcccumulation

                  7,3052619




                  7,3052619




















                      rplantiko is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      rplantiko is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      rplantiko is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      rplantiko is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3175604%2fcan-a-cauchy-sequence-converge-for-one-metric-while-not-converging-for-another%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Sum ergo cogito? 1 nng

                      419 nièngy_Soadمي 19bal1.5o_g

                      Queiggey Chernihivv 9NnOo i Zw X QqKk LpB