Manr CGgsta Nncllz Rde x k meeOo Yyo Pv Ww t Uk kk
Man ek jan ke uu hissa hae isme uske bichaar, feeling rahe hae.
References[badlo | source ke badlo]
| Ii article ek chhota panna hae. Aap iske lamba karke Wikipedia ke madat kare saktaa hae. |
Sum ergo cogito? 1 nng
3
Following Descartes but in the opposite direction: I exist. Something has made the assertion in the previous sentence and must have thought it to do so. Therefore my thoughts exist. Combining with the direction established by Descartes I have cogito ⇔ sum . Since assuming either is equiavlent to assuming the other I conclude that Descartes does not establish existence as following from something more basic or fundamental. Instead he has merely stated a tautology. Am I right or wrong? Or both, or neither?
ontology descartes
share | improve this question
asked yesterday
Dzamo Norton
