Problem with fill colorTikZ: Cropping the Bounding BoxRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationTikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeAsymptote: 3D fill color is undesiredFill color with tikzpictureFill color intersectionsHow can I color fill the annulus with tikz?pgfplots - Problem with the fill commandTikZ fill using draw colorHow to fill a right-angle mark with a color?

Expand and Contract

Why would the Red Woman birth a shadow if she worshipped the Lord of the Light?

Arrow those variables!

Can we compute the area of a quadrilateral with one right angle when we only know the lengths of any three sides?

How writing a dominant 7 sus4 chord in RNA ( Vsus7 chord in the 1st inversion)

Is there a hemisphere-neutral way of specifying a season?

Detention in 1997

Little known, relatively unlikely, but scientifically plausible, apocalyptic (or near apocalyptic) events

Watching something be piped to a file live with tail

Personal Teleportation: From Rags to Riches

Avoiding the "not like other girls" trope?

Why no variance term in Bayesian logistic regression?

Why doesn't using multiple commands with a || or && conditional work?

Forgetting the musical notes while performing in concert

What method can I use to design a dungeon difficult enough that the PCs can't make it through without killing them?

Ambiguity in the definition of entropy

Are there any examples of a variable being normally distributed that is *not* due to the Central Limit Theorem?

What mechanic is there to disable a threat instead of killing it?

A category-like structure without composition?

How do I gain back my faith in my PhD degree?

How do I deal with an unproductive colleague in a small company?

Solving a recurrence relation (poker chips)

Can my sorcerer use a spellbook only to collect spells and scribe scrolls, not cast?

Alternative to sending password over mail?



Problem with fill color


TikZ: Cropping the Bounding BoxRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationTikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeAsymptote: 3D fill color is undesiredFill color with tikzpictureFill color intersectionsHow can I color fill the annulus with tikz?pgfplots - Problem with the fill commandTikZ fill using draw colorHow to fill a right-angle mark with a color?













3















I use the following command to create regular polygons. The 5th argument is there to insert options for styling the polygons. Though the line width is 0.3mm as I set it, it looks like the fill=red option is not accepted.



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath,tikz,tkz-euclide,pgfplots,calculator

newcommandpolygon[5][]
pgfmathsetmacroangle360/#2
pgfmathsetmacroa(#2-1)/2
FLOORasol
pgfmathsetmacrostartangle-90 + angle/2
foreach i in 1,2,...,#2
pgfmathsetmacroxstartangle + angle*i
draw[#5] (x:#3) -- (x + angle:#3) -- cycle;
tkzDefPoint(x:#3)A_#2
tkzDrawPoint(A_#2)
foreach [count=i] j in #4
pgfmathsetmacroxstartangle - angle*(i+sol)
node[anchor=center] at (x:#3+.3) $j$;

begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw[line width=0.3mm] (0,0) circle (1);
polygon[]61A,B,varGamma,varDelta,E,Zline width=0.3mm,fill=red

endtikzpicture
enddocument


I don't know if the structure of the command is not allowing any other option.










share|improve this question






















  • In draw[#5] (x:#3) -- (x + angle:#3) -- cycle; you have nothing to fill (this is just a segment drawn twice), so fill=red is useless here. It is not clear what you want to fill. Do you want (0,0) in place of (cycle) here?

    – Kpym
    2 days ago












  • I want to fill the area inside the polygon and I thought that it can be done trough draw command.

    – mac
    2 days ago
















3















I use the following command to create regular polygons. The 5th argument is there to insert options for styling the polygons. Though the line width is 0.3mm as I set it, it looks like the fill=red option is not accepted.



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath,tikz,tkz-euclide,pgfplots,calculator

newcommandpolygon[5][]
pgfmathsetmacroangle360/#2
pgfmathsetmacroa(#2-1)/2
FLOORasol
pgfmathsetmacrostartangle-90 + angle/2
foreach i in 1,2,...,#2
pgfmathsetmacroxstartangle + angle*i
draw[#5] (x:#3) -- (x + angle:#3) -- cycle;
tkzDefPoint(x:#3)A_#2
tkzDrawPoint(A_#2)
foreach [count=i] j in #4
pgfmathsetmacroxstartangle - angle*(i+sol)
node[anchor=center] at (x:#3+.3) $j$;

begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw[line width=0.3mm] (0,0) circle (1);
polygon[]61A,B,varGamma,varDelta,E,Zline width=0.3mm,fill=red

endtikzpicture
enddocument


I don't know if the structure of the command is not allowing any other option.










share|improve this question






















  • In draw[#5] (x:#3) -- (x + angle:#3) -- cycle; you have nothing to fill (this is just a segment drawn twice), so fill=red is useless here. It is not clear what you want to fill. Do you want (0,0) in place of (cycle) here?

    – Kpym
    2 days ago












  • I want to fill the area inside the polygon and I thought that it can be done trough draw command.

    – mac
    2 days ago














3












3








3








I use the following command to create regular polygons. The 5th argument is there to insert options for styling the polygons. Though the line width is 0.3mm as I set it, it looks like the fill=red option is not accepted.



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath,tikz,tkz-euclide,pgfplots,calculator

newcommandpolygon[5][]
pgfmathsetmacroangle360/#2
pgfmathsetmacroa(#2-1)/2
FLOORasol
pgfmathsetmacrostartangle-90 + angle/2
foreach i in 1,2,...,#2
pgfmathsetmacroxstartangle + angle*i
draw[#5] (x:#3) -- (x + angle:#3) -- cycle;
tkzDefPoint(x:#3)A_#2
tkzDrawPoint(A_#2)
foreach [count=i] j in #4
pgfmathsetmacroxstartangle - angle*(i+sol)
node[anchor=center] at (x:#3+.3) $j$;

begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw[line width=0.3mm] (0,0) circle (1);
polygon[]61A,B,varGamma,varDelta,E,Zline width=0.3mm,fill=red

endtikzpicture
enddocument


I don't know if the structure of the command is not allowing any other option.










share|improve this question














I use the following command to create regular polygons. The 5th argument is there to insert options for styling the polygons. Though the line width is 0.3mm as I set it, it looks like the fill=red option is not accepted.



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath,tikz,tkz-euclide,pgfplots,calculator

newcommandpolygon[5][]
pgfmathsetmacroangle360/#2
pgfmathsetmacroa(#2-1)/2
FLOORasol
pgfmathsetmacrostartangle-90 + angle/2
foreach i in 1,2,...,#2
pgfmathsetmacroxstartangle + angle*i
draw[#5] (x:#3) -- (x + angle:#3) -- cycle;
tkzDefPoint(x:#3)A_#2
tkzDrawPoint(A_#2)
foreach [count=i] j in #4
pgfmathsetmacroxstartangle - angle*(i+sol)
node[anchor=center] at (x:#3+.3) $j$;

begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw[line width=0.3mm] (0,0) circle (1);
polygon[]61A,B,varGamma,varDelta,E,Zline width=0.3mm,fill=red

endtikzpicture
enddocument


I don't know if the structure of the command is not allowing any other option.







tikz-pgf tikz-styles fill polygon






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 days ago









macmac

732716




732716












  • In draw[#5] (x:#3) -- (x + angle:#3) -- cycle; you have nothing to fill (this is just a segment drawn twice), so fill=red is useless here. It is not clear what you want to fill. Do you want (0,0) in place of (cycle) here?

    – Kpym
    2 days ago












  • I want to fill the area inside the polygon and I thought that it can be done trough draw command.

    – mac
    2 days ago


















  • In draw[#5] (x:#3) -- (x + angle:#3) -- cycle; you have nothing to fill (this is just a segment drawn twice), so fill=red is useless here. It is not clear what you want to fill. Do you want (0,0) in place of (cycle) here?

    – Kpym
    2 days ago












  • I want to fill the area inside the polygon and I thought that it can be done trough draw command.

    – mac
    2 days ago

















In draw[#5] (x:#3) -- (x + angle:#3) -- cycle; you have nothing to fill (this is just a segment drawn twice), so fill=red is useless here. It is not clear what you want to fill. Do you want (0,0) in place of (cycle) here?

– Kpym
2 days ago






In draw[#5] (x:#3) -- (x + angle:#3) -- cycle; you have nothing to fill (this is just a segment drawn twice), so fill=red is useless here. It is not clear what you want to fill. Do you want (0,0) in place of (cycle) here?

– Kpym
2 days ago














I want to fill the area inside the polygon and I thought that it can be done trough draw command.

– mac
2 days ago






I want to fill the area inside the polygon and I thought that it can be done trough draw command.

– mac
2 days ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4














I am wondering why you don't follow approaches like this



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath,tikz
usetikzlibraryshapes

newcommandpolygon[5][]%
node[draw,#5,regular polygon,regular polygon sides=#2,minimum size=2*#3cm] (p) ;
foreach i[count=j] in #4
path (p.center)--(p.corner j) node[pos=1.2] $i$;



begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw[line width=0.3mm] (0,0) circle (1);
polygon[]61A,B,varGamma,varDelta,E,Zline width=0.3mm,fill=red
endtikzpicture
enddocument


enter image description here



However, I think you should not define a macro for this.




If you want to follow your way, Kpym has given you the right way: use (0,0) instead of cycle. However, one has to do a bit more. Also, there will be a very thin white line.



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath,tikz,tkz-euclide,pgfplots,calculator

newcommandpolygon[5][]%
pgfmathsetmacroangle360/#2
pgfmathsetmacroa(#2-1)/2
FLOORasol
pgfmathsetmacrostartangle-90 + angle/2
foreach i in 1,2,...,#2
pgfmathsetmacroxstartangle + angle*i
fill[#5] (x:#3) -- (x + angle:#3) -- (0,0);
draw[#5] (x:#3) -- (x + angle:#3);
tkzDefPoint(x:#3)A_#2
tkzDrawPoint(A_#2)

foreach [count=i] j in #4
pgfmathsetmacroxstartangle - angle*(i+sol)
node[anchor=center] at (x:#3+.3) $j$;

foreach i in 1,2,...,#2
pgfmathsetmacroxstartangle + angle*i
tkzDefPoint(x:#3)A_#2
tkzDrawPoint(A_#2)



begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw[line width=0.3mm] (0,0) circle (1);
polygon[]61A,B,varGamma,varDelta,E,Zline width=0.3mm,fill=red

endtikzpicture
enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    The first sulotion is neat and simple. I had no idea that there was a ready to use option for regular polygons. Also I realised, as Kpym mentioned, that each time I was drawing the same segment twice, so there was no polygon to fill.

    – mac
    2 days ago











  • My upvoted surely. Can you put, please, in first plane the gray bullet near Gamma? There is a strange closure of the exagon.

    – Sebastiano
    2 days ago












  • @Sebastiano I will add in a while. However, I don't see anything strange.

    – JouleV
    2 days ago











  • @JouleV In the 2nd picture (2nd code).

    – Sebastiano
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Ah, ok, I will find some ways to solve. Anyway that way is not recommended clearly.

    – JouleV
    2 days ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482549%2fproblem-with-fill-color%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














I am wondering why you don't follow approaches like this



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath,tikz
usetikzlibraryshapes

newcommandpolygon[5][]%
node[draw,#5,regular polygon,regular polygon sides=#2,minimum size=2*#3cm] (p) ;
foreach i[count=j] in #4
path (p.center)--(p.corner j) node[pos=1.2] $i$;



begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw[line width=0.3mm] (0,0) circle (1);
polygon[]61A,B,varGamma,varDelta,E,Zline width=0.3mm,fill=red
endtikzpicture
enddocument


enter image description here



However, I think you should not define a macro for this.




If you want to follow your way, Kpym has given you the right way: use (0,0) instead of cycle. However, one has to do a bit more. Also, there will be a very thin white line.



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath,tikz,tkz-euclide,pgfplots,calculator

newcommandpolygon[5][]%
pgfmathsetmacroangle360/#2
pgfmathsetmacroa(#2-1)/2
FLOORasol
pgfmathsetmacrostartangle-90 + angle/2
foreach i in 1,2,...,#2
pgfmathsetmacroxstartangle + angle*i
fill[#5] (x:#3) -- (x + angle:#3) -- (0,0);
draw[#5] (x:#3) -- (x + angle:#3);
tkzDefPoint(x:#3)A_#2
tkzDrawPoint(A_#2)

foreach [count=i] j in #4
pgfmathsetmacroxstartangle - angle*(i+sol)
node[anchor=center] at (x:#3+.3) $j$;

foreach i in 1,2,...,#2
pgfmathsetmacroxstartangle + angle*i
tkzDefPoint(x:#3)A_#2
tkzDrawPoint(A_#2)



begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw[line width=0.3mm] (0,0) circle (1);
polygon[]61A,B,varGamma,varDelta,E,Zline width=0.3mm,fill=red

endtikzpicture
enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    The first sulotion is neat and simple. I had no idea that there was a ready to use option for regular polygons. Also I realised, as Kpym mentioned, that each time I was drawing the same segment twice, so there was no polygon to fill.

    – mac
    2 days ago











  • My upvoted surely. Can you put, please, in first plane the gray bullet near Gamma? There is a strange closure of the exagon.

    – Sebastiano
    2 days ago












  • @Sebastiano I will add in a while. However, I don't see anything strange.

    – JouleV
    2 days ago











  • @JouleV In the 2nd picture (2nd code).

    – Sebastiano
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Ah, ok, I will find some ways to solve. Anyway that way is not recommended clearly.

    – JouleV
    2 days ago















4














I am wondering why you don't follow approaches like this



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath,tikz
usetikzlibraryshapes

newcommandpolygon[5][]%
node[draw,#5,regular polygon,regular polygon sides=#2,minimum size=2*#3cm] (p) ;
foreach i[count=j] in #4
path (p.center)--(p.corner j) node[pos=1.2] $i$;



begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw[line width=0.3mm] (0,0) circle (1);
polygon[]61A,B,varGamma,varDelta,E,Zline width=0.3mm,fill=red
endtikzpicture
enddocument


enter image description here



However, I think you should not define a macro for this.




If you want to follow your way, Kpym has given you the right way: use (0,0) instead of cycle. However, one has to do a bit more. Also, there will be a very thin white line.



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath,tikz,tkz-euclide,pgfplots,calculator

newcommandpolygon[5][]%
pgfmathsetmacroangle360/#2
pgfmathsetmacroa(#2-1)/2
FLOORasol
pgfmathsetmacrostartangle-90 + angle/2
foreach i in 1,2,...,#2
pgfmathsetmacroxstartangle + angle*i
fill[#5] (x:#3) -- (x + angle:#3) -- (0,0);
draw[#5] (x:#3) -- (x + angle:#3);
tkzDefPoint(x:#3)A_#2
tkzDrawPoint(A_#2)

foreach [count=i] j in #4
pgfmathsetmacroxstartangle - angle*(i+sol)
node[anchor=center] at (x:#3+.3) $j$;

foreach i in 1,2,...,#2
pgfmathsetmacroxstartangle + angle*i
tkzDefPoint(x:#3)A_#2
tkzDrawPoint(A_#2)



begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw[line width=0.3mm] (0,0) circle (1);
polygon[]61A,B,varGamma,varDelta,E,Zline width=0.3mm,fill=red

endtikzpicture
enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    The first sulotion is neat and simple. I had no idea that there was a ready to use option for regular polygons. Also I realised, as Kpym mentioned, that each time I was drawing the same segment twice, so there was no polygon to fill.

    – mac
    2 days ago











  • My upvoted surely. Can you put, please, in first plane the gray bullet near Gamma? There is a strange closure of the exagon.

    – Sebastiano
    2 days ago












  • @Sebastiano I will add in a while. However, I don't see anything strange.

    – JouleV
    2 days ago











  • @JouleV In the 2nd picture (2nd code).

    – Sebastiano
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Ah, ok, I will find some ways to solve. Anyway that way is not recommended clearly.

    – JouleV
    2 days ago













4












4








4







I am wondering why you don't follow approaches like this



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath,tikz
usetikzlibraryshapes

newcommandpolygon[5][]%
node[draw,#5,regular polygon,regular polygon sides=#2,minimum size=2*#3cm] (p) ;
foreach i[count=j] in #4
path (p.center)--(p.corner j) node[pos=1.2] $i$;



begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw[line width=0.3mm] (0,0) circle (1);
polygon[]61A,B,varGamma,varDelta,E,Zline width=0.3mm,fill=red
endtikzpicture
enddocument


enter image description here



However, I think you should not define a macro for this.




If you want to follow your way, Kpym has given you the right way: use (0,0) instead of cycle. However, one has to do a bit more. Also, there will be a very thin white line.



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath,tikz,tkz-euclide,pgfplots,calculator

newcommandpolygon[5][]%
pgfmathsetmacroangle360/#2
pgfmathsetmacroa(#2-1)/2
FLOORasol
pgfmathsetmacrostartangle-90 + angle/2
foreach i in 1,2,...,#2
pgfmathsetmacroxstartangle + angle*i
fill[#5] (x:#3) -- (x + angle:#3) -- (0,0);
draw[#5] (x:#3) -- (x + angle:#3);
tkzDefPoint(x:#3)A_#2
tkzDrawPoint(A_#2)

foreach [count=i] j in #4
pgfmathsetmacroxstartangle - angle*(i+sol)
node[anchor=center] at (x:#3+.3) $j$;

foreach i in 1,2,...,#2
pgfmathsetmacroxstartangle + angle*i
tkzDefPoint(x:#3)A_#2
tkzDrawPoint(A_#2)



begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw[line width=0.3mm] (0,0) circle (1);
polygon[]61A,B,varGamma,varDelta,E,Zline width=0.3mm,fill=red

endtikzpicture
enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer















I am wondering why you don't follow approaches like this



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath,tikz
usetikzlibraryshapes

newcommandpolygon[5][]%
node[draw,#5,regular polygon,regular polygon sides=#2,minimum size=2*#3cm] (p) ;
foreach i[count=j] in #4
path (p.center)--(p.corner j) node[pos=1.2] $i$;



begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw[line width=0.3mm] (0,0) circle (1);
polygon[]61A,B,varGamma,varDelta,E,Zline width=0.3mm,fill=red
endtikzpicture
enddocument


enter image description here



However, I think you should not define a macro for this.




If you want to follow your way, Kpym has given you the right way: use (0,0) instead of cycle. However, one has to do a bit more. Also, there will be a very thin white line.



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath,tikz,tkz-euclide,pgfplots,calculator

newcommandpolygon[5][]%
pgfmathsetmacroangle360/#2
pgfmathsetmacroa(#2-1)/2
FLOORasol
pgfmathsetmacrostartangle-90 + angle/2
foreach i in 1,2,...,#2
pgfmathsetmacroxstartangle + angle*i
fill[#5] (x:#3) -- (x + angle:#3) -- (0,0);
draw[#5] (x:#3) -- (x + angle:#3);
tkzDefPoint(x:#3)A_#2
tkzDrawPoint(A_#2)

foreach [count=i] j in #4
pgfmathsetmacroxstartangle - angle*(i+sol)
node[anchor=center] at (x:#3+.3) $j$;

foreach i in 1,2,...,#2
pgfmathsetmacroxstartangle + angle*i
tkzDefPoint(x:#3)A_#2
tkzDrawPoint(A_#2)



begindocument
begintikzpicture
draw[line width=0.3mm] (0,0) circle (1);
polygon[]61A,B,varGamma,varDelta,E,Zline width=0.3mm,fill=red

endtikzpicture
enddocument


enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 days ago

























answered 2 days ago









JouleVJouleV

10.3k22558




10.3k22558







  • 1





    The first sulotion is neat and simple. I had no idea that there was a ready to use option for regular polygons. Also I realised, as Kpym mentioned, that each time I was drawing the same segment twice, so there was no polygon to fill.

    – mac
    2 days ago











  • My upvoted surely. Can you put, please, in first plane the gray bullet near Gamma? There is a strange closure of the exagon.

    – Sebastiano
    2 days ago












  • @Sebastiano I will add in a while. However, I don't see anything strange.

    – JouleV
    2 days ago











  • @JouleV In the 2nd picture (2nd code).

    – Sebastiano
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Ah, ok, I will find some ways to solve. Anyway that way is not recommended clearly.

    – JouleV
    2 days ago












  • 1





    The first sulotion is neat and simple. I had no idea that there was a ready to use option for regular polygons. Also I realised, as Kpym mentioned, that each time I was drawing the same segment twice, so there was no polygon to fill.

    – mac
    2 days ago











  • My upvoted surely. Can you put, please, in first plane the gray bullet near Gamma? There is a strange closure of the exagon.

    – Sebastiano
    2 days ago












  • @Sebastiano I will add in a while. However, I don't see anything strange.

    – JouleV
    2 days ago











  • @JouleV In the 2nd picture (2nd code).

    – Sebastiano
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Ah, ok, I will find some ways to solve. Anyway that way is not recommended clearly.

    – JouleV
    2 days ago







1




1





The first sulotion is neat and simple. I had no idea that there was a ready to use option for regular polygons. Also I realised, as Kpym mentioned, that each time I was drawing the same segment twice, so there was no polygon to fill.

– mac
2 days ago





The first sulotion is neat and simple. I had no idea that there was a ready to use option for regular polygons. Also I realised, as Kpym mentioned, that each time I was drawing the same segment twice, so there was no polygon to fill.

– mac
2 days ago













My upvoted surely. Can you put, please, in first plane the gray bullet near Gamma? There is a strange closure of the exagon.

– Sebastiano
2 days ago






My upvoted surely. Can you put, please, in first plane the gray bullet near Gamma? There is a strange closure of the exagon.

– Sebastiano
2 days ago














@Sebastiano I will add in a while. However, I don't see anything strange.

– JouleV
2 days ago





@Sebastiano I will add in a while. However, I don't see anything strange.

– JouleV
2 days ago













@JouleV In the 2nd picture (2nd code).

– Sebastiano
2 days ago





@JouleV In the 2nd picture (2nd code).

– Sebastiano
2 days ago




1




1





Ah, ok, I will find some ways to solve. Anyway that way is not recommended clearly.

– JouleV
2 days ago





Ah, ok, I will find some ways to solve. Anyway that way is not recommended clearly.

– JouleV
2 days ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482549%2fproblem-with-fill-color%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Sum ergo cogito? 1 nng

419 nièngy_Soadمي 19bal1.5o_g

Queiggey Chernihivv 9NnOo i Zw X QqKk LpB