Can I set a Ready action to trigger when literally anything happens?Does taking the option to ignore a Ready trigger waste it, or let you use it on a later trigger?How specific does the Action for Ready need to be?How specific does the trigger for a readied action have to be?When does a reaction happen if the trigger is movement?Can you ready an action for “immediately before my next turn”?Timing of the Ready action when the trigger is associated with spell casting?Does taking the option to ignore a Ready trigger waste it, or let you use it on a later trigger?Can you take a readied action in the middle of another character's action?Can the action in a Ready Action be conditional?Could a Ready action happen before a dragon's breath weapon by having the trigger be “targeting someone with it”?Is “when the spellcaster decides to cast a spell at me” a perceivable Ready trigger using the Detect Thoughts spell?Can you Ready two actions using Action SurgeDo you get Extra Attacks when you ready an attack and use it in your own turn?How specific does the Action for Ready need to be?

Today is the Center

Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)

Arrow those variables!

Are astronomers waiting to see something in an image from a gravitational lens that they've already seen in an adjacent image?

What does "Puller Prush Person" mean?

What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?

Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?

Theorems that impeded progress

Why is 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there's 300k+ births a month?

Can a vampire attack twice with their claws using Multiattack?

Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?

What's the output of a record needle playing an out-of-speed record

Is it legal for company to use my work email to pretend I still work there?

Are the number of citations and number of published articles the most important criteria for a tenure promotion?

Paid for article while in US on F-1 visa?

What's that red-plus icon near a text?

Why does Kotter return in Welcome Back Kotter?

What is a clear way to write a bar that has an extra beat?

Why can't we play rap on piano?

How do I gain back my faith in my PhD degree?

How much of data wrangling is a data scientist's job?

How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?

What do the dots in this tr command do: tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "JVPQBOV" (with 13 dots)

Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free



Can I set a Ready action to trigger when literally anything happens?


Does taking the option to ignore a Ready trigger waste it, or let you use it on a later trigger?How specific does the Action for Ready need to be?How specific does the trigger for a readied action have to be?When does a reaction happen if the trigger is movement?Can you ready an action for “immediately before my next turn”?Timing of the Ready action when the trigger is associated with spell casting?Does taking the option to ignore a Ready trigger waste it, or let you use it on a later trigger?Can you take a readied action in the middle of another character's action?Can the action in a Ready Action be conditional?Could a Ready action happen before a dragon's breath weapon by having the trigger be “targeting someone with it”?Is “when the spellcaster decides to cast a spell at me” a perceivable Ready trigger using the Detect Thoughts spell?Can you Ready two actions using Action SurgeDo you get Extra Attacks when you ready an attack and use it in your own turn?How specific does the Action for Ready need to be?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








5












$begingroup$


The Ready action in the PHB specifies that you can specify what circumstances will trigger it, and that when the trigger occurs, you can take your reaction or ignore the trigger. Further, if the action doesn't occur, you don't do anything. The only written condition on the trigger is that it is a "perceivable circumstance."



It seems to me that, RAW, you could always use the trigger "If I perceive literally anything happening," and choose to ignore the trigger whenever you don't feel like using the readied action -- effectively triggering whenever you want. Is this a valid condition for the Ready action? If so, it seems as if the further conditions on the Ready action are unnecessary, and as if you could just always use that trigger rather than specifying a specific condition, but that seems unlikely.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – mxyzplk
    Apr 3 at 3:22










  • $begingroup$
    Related: Does taking the option to ignore a Ready trigger waste it, or let you use it on a later trigger? and How specific does the trigger for a readied action have to be? and How specific does the Action for Ready need to be?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 days ago

















5












$begingroup$


The Ready action in the PHB specifies that you can specify what circumstances will trigger it, and that when the trigger occurs, you can take your reaction or ignore the trigger. Further, if the action doesn't occur, you don't do anything. The only written condition on the trigger is that it is a "perceivable circumstance."



It seems to me that, RAW, you could always use the trigger "If I perceive literally anything happening," and choose to ignore the trigger whenever you don't feel like using the readied action -- effectively triggering whenever you want. Is this a valid condition for the Ready action? If so, it seems as if the further conditions on the Ready action are unnecessary, and as if you could just always use that trigger rather than specifying a specific condition, but that seems unlikely.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – mxyzplk
    Apr 3 at 3:22










  • $begingroup$
    Related: Does taking the option to ignore a Ready trigger waste it, or let you use it on a later trigger? and How specific does the trigger for a readied action have to be? and How specific does the Action for Ready need to be?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 days ago













5












5








5





$begingroup$


The Ready action in the PHB specifies that you can specify what circumstances will trigger it, and that when the trigger occurs, you can take your reaction or ignore the trigger. Further, if the action doesn't occur, you don't do anything. The only written condition on the trigger is that it is a "perceivable circumstance."



It seems to me that, RAW, you could always use the trigger "If I perceive literally anything happening," and choose to ignore the trigger whenever you don't feel like using the readied action -- effectively triggering whenever you want. Is this a valid condition for the Ready action? If so, it seems as if the further conditions on the Ready action are unnecessary, and as if you could just always use that trigger rather than specifying a specific condition, but that seems unlikely.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




The Ready action in the PHB specifies that you can specify what circumstances will trigger it, and that when the trigger occurs, you can take your reaction or ignore the trigger. Further, if the action doesn't occur, you don't do anything. The only written condition on the trigger is that it is a "perceivable circumstance."



It seems to me that, RAW, you could always use the trigger "If I perceive literally anything happening," and choose to ignore the trigger whenever you don't feel like using the readied action -- effectively triggering whenever you want. Is this a valid condition for the Ready action? If so, it seems as if the further conditions on the Ready action are unnecessary, and as if you could just always use that trigger rather than specifying a specific condition, but that seems unlikely.







dnd-5e readied-action






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 3 at 2:24







Louis Wasserman

















asked Apr 3 at 1:22









Louis WassermanLouis Wasserman

35810




35810











  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – mxyzplk
    Apr 3 at 3:22










  • $begingroup$
    Related: Does taking the option to ignore a Ready trigger waste it, or let you use it on a later trigger? and How specific does the trigger for a readied action have to be? and How specific does the Action for Ready need to be?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 days ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – mxyzplk
    Apr 3 at 3:22










  • $begingroup$
    Related: Does taking the option to ignore a Ready trigger waste it, or let you use it on a later trigger? and How specific does the trigger for a readied action have to be? and How specific does the Action for Ready need to be?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 days ago















$begingroup$
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
$endgroup$
– mxyzplk
Apr 3 at 3:22




$begingroup$
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
$endgroup$
– mxyzplk
Apr 3 at 3:22












$begingroup$
Related: Does taking the option to ignore a Ready trigger waste it, or let you use it on a later trigger? and How specific does the trigger for a readied action have to be? and How specific does the Action for Ready need to be?
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Related: Does taking the option to ignore a Ready trigger waste it, or let you use it on a later trigger? and How specific does the trigger for a readied action have to be? and How specific does the Action for Ready need to be?
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
2 days ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















17












$begingroup$

The perceivable circumstance must be particular.



You've missed some context from the rules for the Ready action (emphasis mine):




Sometimes you want to get the jump on a foe or wait for a particular circumstance before you act. To do so, you can take the Ready action on your turn, which lets you act using your reaction before the start of your next turn.



First, you decide what perceivable circumstance will trigger your reaction. Then, you choose the action you will take in response to that trigger, or you choose to move up to your speed in response to it. Examples include "If the cultist steps on the trapdoor, I'll pull the lever that opens it," and "If the goblin steps next to me, I move away."




The trigger must be both perceivable and particular. Though "literally anything happening" is technically something you can perceive, it's not particular, given that it would trigger immediately on the same turn you take the Ready action (the world doesn't stop being full of perceptible happenings on your turn). It also doesn't fit the examples given at face value, each of which depends on obvious occurrences.



Although there's no explicit metric of specificity, the trigger you propose definitely isn't valid. The examples provide a rough estimate for triggers that most DMs should consider reasonable. Aim for the thought process of a real person making a cause-and-effect decision about the world around them.



There's sometimes a cost to ignoring the trigger.



You sometimes have to expend a resource just to take the Ready action, even if you end up ignoring the trigger, such as when you Ready to cast using a spell using a spell slot (continued from the passage above, emphasis mine):




When the trigger occurs, you can either take your reaction right after the trigger finishes or ignore the trigger... When you ready a spell, you cast it as normal but hold its energy, which you release with your reaction when the trigger occurs.




If don't use your reaction to release the spell before the start of your next turn, the spell slot is wasted. There may be other features that have a similar up-front cost when using the Ready action.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    8












    $begingroup$


    It seems to me that, RAW, you could always use the trigger "If I perceive literally anything happening," and choose to ignore the trigger whenever you don't feel like using the readied action -- effectively triggering whenever you want. Is this a valid condition for the Ready action?




    This might be a valid trigger, depending on your reading of the semantics of "particular circumstance". But it barely matters, because it's a spectacularly useless one. The rule says:




    When the trigger occurs, you can either take your reaction right after the trigger finishes or ignore the trigger.




    Assuming your character has senses and is experiencing the passage of time, this will happen immediately, at which point you will have to decide to take your declared action or not. There is no "reset, and wait until next instance of the trigger".



    To pick a more normal example: if you say "When someone comes through the door, I shoot 'em", and then your buddy comes through the door followed by an orc a second later, you can shoot your buddy or not — but you can't ignore that trigger and then still have the action readied to shoot the orc.



    Your plan is the same, except will go wrong immediately every time.



    Or, in other words, there is not just sometimes a cost to readying an action, like the use of a spell slot or similar. There is always a cost — you use your action to ready for a circumstance, and if that situation doesn't happen or happens in a way you don't want to act on after all, you get nothing in exchange.



    With your suggested trigger, immediately after your turn is over, you will perceive something, and therefore need to decide right then if you actually want to use your reaction to do the thing you planned. If you don't, the round moves on and you're done. This is equivalent to saying "I might shoot at the target. Yep, I do. That's my turn." or "I might shoot the target. Nope, wait, I decided not to. Skip my turn."






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Could you clarify why you believe that the trigger can only occur once? The wording of the rule seems ambiguous and I've seen it used either way, e.g. an answer to another question suggested the trigger "a creature moves [5 ft or more]".
      $endgroup$
      – Ruther Rendommeleigh
      2 days ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      The example I was thinking of: rpg.stackexchange.com/a/118864/39342 - "It is worth noting that you may ignore any number of triggers but still choose to react on a later trigger as long as it is before the start of your next turn." Looks like Crawford agrees.
      $endgroup$
      – Ruther Rendommeleigh
      2 days ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Your phrase "there is not just sometimes a cost to readying an action, like the use of a spell slot or similar" seems like a direct commentary on my answer and not an intrinsic point of your own answer. I suggest you rephrase in a way that doesn't assume somebody has already read my answer. (For reference, your answer is good and I've up-voted.)
      $endgroup$
      – Bloodcinder
      2 days ago











    • $begingroup$
      @RutherRendommeleigh's reference to a Crawford answer that directly contradicts this post's interpretation is convincing. That sure sounds like a ruling that you absolutely do get to wait for the next occurrence of the trigger.
      $endgroup$
      – Louis Wasserman
      2 days ago











    • $begingroup$
      Not very convincing to me as a) it does not seem to fit a plain reading of "either or" and b) it immediately leads to ridiculous results. I think this is a case where Crawford's off-the-cuff response is just wrong. (And they're no longer official, so we don't have to bend reality to make them fit.)
      $endgroup$
      – mattdm
      2 days ago











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "122"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144423%2fcan-i-set-a-ready-action-to-trigger-when-literally-anything-happens%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    17












    $begingroup$

    The perceivable circumstance must be particular.



    You've missed some context from the rules for the Ready action (emphasis mine):




    Sometimes you want to get the jump on a foe or wait for a particular circumstance before you act. To do so, you can take the Ready action on your turn, which lets you act using your reaction before the start of your next turn.



    First, you decide what perceivable circumstance will trigger your reaction. Then, you choose the action you will take in response to that trigger, or you choose to move up to your speed in response to it. Examples include "If the cultist steps on the trapdoor, I'll pull the lever that opens it," and "If the goblin steps next to me, I move away."




    The trigger must be both perceivable and particular. Though "literally anything happening" is technically something you can perceive, it's not particular, given that it would trigger immediately on the same turn you take the Ready action (the world doesn't stop being full of perceptible happenings on your turn). It also doesn't fit the examples given at face value, each of which depends on obvious occurrences.



    Although there's no explicit metric of specificity, the trigger you propose definitely isn't valid. The examples provide a rough estimate for triggers that most DMs should consider reasonable. Aim for the thought process of a real person making a cause-and-effect decision about the world around them.



    There's sometimes a cost to ignoring the trigger.



    You sometimes have to expend a resource just to take the Ready action, even if you end up ignoring the trigger, such as when you Ready to cast using a spell using a spell slot (continued from the passage above, emphasis mine):




    When the trigger occurs, you can either take your reaction right after the trigger finishes or ignore the trigger... When you ready a spell, you cast it as normal but hold its energy, which you release with your reaction when the trigger occurs.




    If don't use your reaction to release the spell before the start of your next turn, the spell slot is wasted. There may be other features that have a similar up-front cost when using the Ready action.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      17












      $begingroup$

      The perceivable circumstance must be particular.



      You've missed some context from the rules for the Ready action (emphasis mine):




      Sometimes you want to get the jump on a foe or wait for a particular circumstance before you act. To do so, you can take the Ready action on your turn, which lets you act using your reaction before the start of your next turn.



      First, you decide what perceivable circumstance will trigger your reaction. Then, you choose the action you will take in response to that trigger, or you choose to move up to your speed in response to it. Examples include "If the cultist steps on the trapdoor, I'll pull the lever that opens it," and "If the goblin steps next to me, I move away."




      The trigger must be both perceivable and particular. Though "literally anything happening" is technically something you can perceive, it's not particular, given that it would trigger immediately on the same turn you take the Ready action (the world doesn't stop being full of perceptible happenings on your turn). It also doesn't fit the examples given at face value, each of which depends on obvious occurrences.



      Although there's no explicit metric of specificity, the trigger you propose definitely isn't valid. The examples provide a rough estimate for triggers that most DMs should consider reasonable. Aim for the thought process of a real person making a cause-and-effect decision about the world around them.



      There's sometimes a cost to ignoring the trigger.



      You sometimes have to expend a resource just to take the Ready action, even if you end up ignoring the trigger, such as when you Ready to cast using a spell using a spell slot (continued from the passage above, emphasis mine):




      When the trigger occurs, you can either take your reaction right after the trigger finishes or ignore the trigger... When you ready a spell, you cast it as normal but hold its energy, which you release with your reaction when the trigger occurs.




      If don't use your reaction to release the spell before the start of your next turn, the spell slot is wasted. There may be other features that have a similar up-front cost when using the Ready action.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        17












        17








        17





        $begingroup$

        The perceivable circumstance must be particular.



        You've missed some context from the rules for the Ready action (emphasis mine):




        Sometimes you want to get the jump on a foe or wait for a particular circumstance before you act. To do so, you can take the Ready action on your turn, which lets you act using your reaction before the start of your next turn.



        First, you decide what perceivable circumstance will trigger your reaction. Then, you choose the action you will take in response to that trigger, or you choose to move up to your speed in response to it. Examples include "If the cultist steps on the trapdoor, I'll pull the lever that opens it," and "If the goblin steps next to me, I move away."




        The trigger must be both perceivable and particular. Though "literally anything happening" is technically something you can perceive, it's not particular, given that it would trigger immediately on the same turn you take the Ready action (the world doesn't stop being full of perceptible happenings on your turn). It also doesn't fit the examples given at face value, each of which depends on obvious occurrences.



        Although there's no explicit metric of specificity, the trigger you propose definitely isn't valid. The examples provide a rough estimate for triggers that most DMs should consider reasonable. Aim for the thought process of a real person making a cause-and-effect decision about the world around them.



        There's sometimes a cost to ignoring the trigger.



        You sometimes have to expend a resource just to take the Ready action, even if you end up ignoring the trigger, such as when you Ready to cast using a spell using a spell slot (continued from the passage above, emphasis mine):




        When the trigger occurs, you can either take your reaction right after the trigger finishes or ignore the trigger... When you ready a spell, you cast it as normal but hold its energy, which you release with your reaction when the trigger occurs.




        If don't use your reaction to release the spell before the start of your next turn, the spell slot is wasted. There may be other features that have a similar up-front cost when using the Ready action.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        The perceivable circumstance must be particular.



        You've missed some context from the rules for the Ready action (emphasis mine):




        Sometimes you want to get the jump on a foe or wait for a particular circumstance before you act. To do so, you can take the Ready action on your turn, which lets you act using your reaction before the start of your next turn.



        First, you decide what perceivable circumstance will trigger your reaction. Then, you choose the action you will take in response to that trigger, or you choose to move up to your speed in response to it. Examples include "If the cultist steps on the trapdoor, I'll pull the lever that opens it," and "If the goblin steps next to me, I move away."




        The trigger must be both perceivable and particular. Though "literally anything happening" is technically something you can perceive, it's not particular, given that it would trigger immediately on the same turn you take the Ready action (the world doesn't stop being full of perceptible happenings on your turn). It also doesn't fit the examples given at face value, each of which depends on obvious occurrences.



        Although there's no explicit metric of specificity, the trigger you propose definitely isn't valid. The examples provide a rough estimate for triggers that most DMs should consider reasonable. Aim for the thought process of a real person making a cause-and-effect decision about the world around them.



        There's sometimes a cost to ignoring the trigger.



        You sometimes have to expend a resource just to take the Ready action, even if you end up ignoring the trigger, such as when you Ready to cast using a spell using a spell slot (continued from the passage above, emphasis mine):




        When the trigger occurs, you can either take your reaction right after the trigger finishes or ignore the trigger... When you ready a spell, you cast it as normal but hold its energy, which you release with your reaction when the trigger occurs.




        If don't use your reaction to release the spell before the start of your next turn, the spell slot is wasted. There may be other features that have a similar up-front cost when using the Ready action.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 2 days ago

























        answered Apr 3 at 2:06









        BloodcinderBloodcinder

        24.1k389144




        24.1k389144























            8












            $begingroup$


            It seems to me that, RAW, you could always use the trigger "If I perceive literally anything happening," and choose to ignore the trigger whenever you don't feel like using the readied action -- effectively triggering whenever you want. Is this a valid condition for the Ready action?




            This might be a valid trigger, depending on your reading of the semantics of "particular circumstance". But it barely matters, because it's a spectacularly useless one. The rule says:




            When the trigger occurs, you can either take your reaction right after the trigger finishes or ignore the trigger.




            Assuming your character has senses and is experiencing the passage of time, this will happen immediately, at which point you will have to decide to take your declared action or not. There is no "reset, and wait until next instance of the trigger".



            To pick a more normal example: if you say "When someone comes through the door, I shoot 'em", and then your buddy comes through the door followed by an orc a second later, you can shoot your buddy or not — but you can't ignore that trigger and then still have the action readied to shoot the orc.



            Your plan is the same, except will go wrong immediately every time.



            Or, in other words, there is not just sometimes a cost to readying an action, like the use of a spell slot or similar. There is always a cost — you use your action to ready for a circumstance, and if that situation doesn't happen or happens in a way you don't want to act on after all, you get nothing in exchange.



            With your suggested trigger, immediately after your turn is over, you will perceive something, and therefore need to decide right then if you actually want to use your reaction to do the thing you planned. If you don't, the round moves on and you're done. This is equivalent to saying "I might shoot at the target. Yep, I do. That's my turn." or "I might shoot the target. Nope, wait, I decided not to. Skip my turn."






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Could you clarify why you believe that the trigger can only occur once? The wording of the rule seems ambiguous and I've seen it used either way, e.g. an answer to another question suggested the trigger "a creature moves [5 ft or more]".
              $endgroup$
              – Ruther Rendommeleigh
              2 days ago






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              The example I was thinking of: rpg.stackexchange.com/a/118864/39342 - "It is worth noting that you may ignore any number of triggers but still choose to react on a later trigger as long as it is before the start of your next turn." Looks like Crawford agrees.
              $endgroup$
              – Ruther Rendommeleigh
              2 days ago







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Your phrase "there is not just sometimes a cost to readying an action, like the use of a spell slot or similar" seems like a direct commentary on my answer and not an intrinsic point of your own answer. I suggest you rephrase in a way that doesn't assume somebody has already read my answer. (For reference, your answer is good and I've up-voted.)
              $endgroup$
              – Bloodcinder
              2 days ago











            • $begingroup$
              @RutherRendommeleigh's reference to a Crawford answer that directly contradicts this post's interpretation is convincing. That sure sounds like a ruling that you absolutely do get to wait for the next occurrence of the trigger.
              $endgroup$
              – Louis Wasserman
              2 days ago











            • $begingroup$
              Not very convincing to me as a) it does not seem to fit a plain reading of "either or" and b) it immediately leads to ridiculous results. I think this is a case where Crawford's off-the-cuff response is just wrong. (And they're no longer official, so we don't have to bend reality to make them fit.)
              $endgroup$
              – mattdm
              2 days ago















            8












            $begingroup$


            It seems to me that, RAW, you could always use the trigger "If I perceive literally anything happening," and choose to ignore the trigger whenever you don't feel like using the readied action -- effectively triggering whenever you want. Is this a valid condition for the Ready action?




            This might be a valid trigger, depending on your reading of the semantics of "particular circumstance". But it barely matters, because it's a spectacularly useless one. The rule says:




            When the trigger occurs, you can either take your reaction right after the trigger finishes or ignore the trigger.




            Assuming your character has senses and is experiencing the passage of time, this will happen immediately, at which point you will have to decide to take your declared action or not. There is no "reset, and wait until next instance of the trigger".



            To pick a more normal example: if you say "When someone comes through the door, I shoot 'em", and then your buddy comes through the door followed by an orc a second later, you can shoot your buddy or not — but you can't ignore that trigger and then still have the action readied to shoot the orc.



            Your plan is the same, except will go wrong immediately every time.



            Or, in other words, there is not just sometimes a cost to readying an action, like the use of a spell slot or similar. There is always a cost — you use your action to ready for a circumstance, and if that situation doesn't happen or happens in a way you don't want to act on after all, you get nothing in exchange.



            With your suggested trigger, immediately after your turn is over, you will perceive something, and therefore need to decide right then if you actually want to use your reaction to do the thing you planned. If you don't, the round moves on and you're done. This is equivalent to saying "I might shoot at the target. Yep, I do. That's my turn." or "I might shoot the target. Nope, wait, I decided not to. Skip my turn."






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Could you clarify why you believe that the trigger can only occur once? The wording of the rule seems ambiguous and I've seen it used either way, e.g. an answer to another question suggested the trigger "a creature moves [5 ft or more]".
              $endgroup$
              – Ruther Rendommeleigh
              2 days ago






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              The example I was thinking of: rpg.stackexchange.com/a/118864/39342 - "It is worth noting that you may ignore any number of triggers but still choose to react on a later trigger as long as it is before the start of your next turn." Looks like Crawford agrees.
              $endgroup$
              – Ruther Rendommeleigh
              2 days ago







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Your phrase "there is not just sometimes a cost to readying an action, like the use of a spell slot or similar" seems like a direct commentary on my answer and not an intrinsic point of your own answer. I suggest you rephrase in a way that doesn't assume somebody has already read my answer. (For reference, your answer is good and I've up-voted.)
              $endgroup$
              – Bloodcinder
              2 days ago











            • $begingroup$
              @RutherRendommeleigh's reference to a Crawford answer that directly contradicts this post's interpretation is convincing. That sure sounds like a ruling that you absolutely do get to wait for the next occurrence of the trigger.
              $endgroup$
              – Louis Wasserman
              2 days ago











            • $begingroup$
              Not very convincing to me as a) it does not seem to fit a plain reading of "either or" and b) it immediately leads to ridiculous results. I think this is a case where Crawford's off-the-cuff response is just wrong. (And they're no longer official, so we don't have to bend reality to make them fit.)
              $endgroup$
              – mattdm
              2 days ago













            8












            8








            8





            $begingroup$


            It seems to me that, RAW, you could always use the trigger "If I perceive literally anything happening," and choose to ignore the trigger whenever you don't feel like using the readied action -- effectively triggering whenever you want. Is this a valid condition for the Ready action?




            This might be a valid trigger, depending on your reading of the semantics of "particular circumstance". But it barely matters, because it's a spectacularly useless one. The rule says:




            When the trigger occurs, you can either take your reaction right after the trigger finishes or ignore the trigger.




            Assuming your character has senses and is experiencing the passage of time, this will happen immediately, at which point you will have to decide to take your declared action or not. There is no "reset, and wait until next instance of the trigger".



            To pick a more normal example: if you say "When someone comes through the door, I shoot 'em", and then your buddy comes through the door followed by an orc a second later, you can shoot your buddy or not — but you can't ignore that trigger and then still have the action readied to shoot the orc.



            Your plan is the same, except will go wrong immediately every time.



            Or, in other words, there is not just sometimes a cost to readying an action, like the use of a spell slot or similar. There is always a cost — you use your action to ready for a circumstance, and if that situation doesn't happen or happens in a way you don't want to act on after all, you get nothing in exchange.



            With your suggested trigger, immediately after your turn is over, you will perceive something, and therefore need to decide right then if you actually want to use your reaction to do the thing you planned. If you don't, the round moves on and you're done. This is equivalent to saying "I might shoot at the target. Yep, I do. That's my turn." or "I might shoot the target. Nope, wait, I decided not to. Skip my turn."






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$




            It seems to me that, RAW, you could always use the trigger "If I perceive literally anything happening," and choose to ignore the trigger whenever you don't feel like using the readied action -- effectively triggering whenever you want. Is this a valid condition for the Ready action?




            This might be a valid trigger, depending on your reading of the semantics of "particular circumstance". But it barely matters, because it's a spectacularly useless one. The rule says:




            When the trigger occurs, you can either take your reaction right after the trigger finishes or ignore the trigger.




            Assuming your character has senses and is experiencing the passage of time, this will happen immediately, at which point you will have to decide to take your declared action or not. There is no "reset, and wait until next instance of the trigger".



            To pick a more normal example: if you say "When someone comes through the door, I shoot 'em", and then your buddy comes through the door followed by an orc a second later, you can shoot your buddy or not — but you can't ignore that trigger and then still have the action readied to shoot the orc.



            Your plan is the same, except will go wrong immediately every time.



            Or, in other words, there is not just sometimes a cost to readying an action, like the use of a spell slot or similar. There is always a cost — you use your action to ready for a circumstance, and if that situation doesn't happen or happens in a way you don't want to act on after all, you get nothing in exchange.



            With your suggested trigger, immediately after your turn is over, you will perceive something, and therefore need to decide right then if you actually want to use your reaction to do the thing you planned. If you don't, the round moves on and you're done. This is equivalent to saying "I might shoot at the target. Yep, I do. That's my turn." or "I might shoot the target. Nope, wait, I decided not to. Skip my turn."







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 2 days ago

























            answered Apr 3 at 3:54









            mattdmmattdm

            17.5k880130




            17.5k880130







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Could you clarify why you believe that the trigger can only occur once? The wording of the rule seems ambiguous and I've seen it used either way, e.g. an answer to another question suggested the trigger "a creature moves [5 ft or more]".
              $endgroup$
              – Ruther Rendommeleigh
              2 days ago






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              The example I was thinking of: rpg.stackexchange.com/a/118864/39342 - "It is worth noting that you may ignore any number of triggers but still choose to react on a later trigger as long as it is before the start of your next turn." Looks like Crawford agrees.
              $endgroup$
              – Ruther Rendommeleigh
              2 days ago







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Your phrase "there is not just sometimes a cost to readying an action, like the use of a spell slot or similar" seems like a direct commentary on my answer and not an intrinsic point of your own answer. I suggest you rephrase in a way that doesn't assume somebody has already read my answer. (For reference, your answer is good and I've up-voted.)
              $endgroup$
              – Bloodcinder
              2 days ago











            • $begingroup$
              @RutherRendommeleigh's reference to a Crawford answer that directly contradicts this post's interpretation is convincing. That sure sounds like a ruling that you absolutely do get to wait for the next occurrence of the trigger.
              $endgroup$
              – Louis Wasserman
              2 days ago











            • $begingroup$
              Not very convincing to me as a) it does not seem to fit a plain reading of "either or" and b) it immediately leads to ridiculous results. I think this is a case where Crawford's off-the-cuff response is just wrong. (And they're no longer official, so we don't have to bend reality to make them fit.)
              $endgroup$
              – mattdm
              2 days ago












            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Could you clarify why you believe that the trigger can only occur once? The wording of the rule seems ambiguous and I've seen it used either way, e.g. an answer to another question suggested the trigger "a creature moves [5 ft or more]".
              $endgroup$
              – Ruther Rendommeleigh
              2 days ago






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              The example I was thinking of: rpg.stackexchange.com/a/118864/39342 - "It is worth noting that you may ignore any number of triggers but still choose to react on a later trigger as long as it is before the start of your next turn." Looks like Crawford agrees.
              $endgroup$
              – Ruther Rendommeleigh
              2 days ago







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Your phrase "there is not just sometimes a cost to readying an action, like the use of a spell slot or similar" seems like a direct commentary on my answer and not an intrinsic point of your own answer. I suggest you rephrase in a way that doesn't assume somebody has already read my answer. (For reference, your answer is good and I've up-voted.)
              $endgroup$
              – Bloodcinder
              2 days ago











            • $begingroup$
              @RutherRendommeleigh's reference to a Crawford answer that directly contradicts this post's interpretation is convincing. That sure sounds like a ruling that you absolutely do get to wait for the next occurrence of the trigger.
              $endgroup$
              – Louis Wasserman
              2 days ago











            • $begingroup$
              Not very convincing to me as a) it does not seem to fit a plain reading of "either or" and b) it immediately leads to ridiculous results. I think this is a case where Crawford's off-the-cuff response is just wrong. (And they're no longer official, so we don't have to bend reality to make them fit.)
              $endgroup$
              – mattdm
              2 days ago







            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Could you clarify why you believe that the trigger can only occur once? The wording of the rule seems ambiguous and I've seen it used either way, e.g. an answer to another question suggested the trigger "a creature moves [5 ft or more]".
            $endgroup$
            – Ruther Rendommeleigh
            2 days ago




            $begingroup$
            Could you clarify why you believe that the trigger can only occur once? The wording of the rule seems ambiguous and I've seen it used either way, e.g. an answer to another question suggested the trigger "a creature moves [5 ft or more]".
            $endgroup$
            – Ruther Rendommeleigh
            2 days ago




            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            The example I was thinking of: rpg.stackexchange.com/a/118864/39342 - "It is worth noting that you may ignore any number of triggers but still choose to react on a later trigger as long as it is before the start of your next turn." Looks like Crawford agrees.
            $endgroup$
            – Ruther Rendommeleigh
            2 days ago





            $begingroup$
            The example I was thinking of: rpg.stackexchange.com/a/118864/39342 - "It is worth noting that you may ignore any number of triggers but still choose to react on a later trigger as long as it is before the start of your next turn." Looks like Crawford agrees.
            $endgroup$
            – Ruther Rendommeleigh
            2 days ago





            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Your phrase "there is not just sometimes a cost to readying an action, like the use of a spell slot or similar" seems like a direct commentary on my answer and not an intrinsic point of your own answer. I suggest you rephrase in a way that doesn't assume somebody has already read my answer. (For reference, your answer is good and I've up-voted.)
            $endgroup$
            – Bloodcinder
            2 days ago





            $begingroup$
            Your phrase "there is not just sometimes a cost to readying an action, like the use of a spell slot or similar" seems like a direct commentary on my answer and not an intrinsic point of your own answer. I suggest you rephrase in a way that doesn't assume somebody has already read my answer. (For reference, your answer is good and I've up-voted.)
            $endgroup$
            – Bloodcinder
            2 days ago













            $begingroup$
            @RutherRendommeleigh's reference to a Crawford answer that directly contradicts this post's interpretation is convincing. That sure sounds like a ruling that you absolutely do get to wait for the next occurrence of the trigger.
            $endgroup$
            – Louis Wasserman
            2 days ago





            $begingroup$
            @RutherRendommeleigh's reference to a Crawford answer that directly contradicts this post's interpretation is convincing. That sure sounds like a ruling that you absolutely do get to wait for the next occurrence of the trigger.
            $endgroup$
            – Louis Wasserman
            2 days ago













            $begingroup$
            Not very convincing to me as a) it does not seem to fit a plain reading of "either or" and b) it immediately leads to ridiculous results. I think this is a case where Crawford's off-the-cuff response is just wrong. (And they're no longer official, so we don't have to bend reality to make them fit.)
            $endgroup$
            – mattdm
            2 days ago




            $begingroup$
            Not very convincing to me as a) it does not seem to fit a plain reading of "either or" and b) it immediately leads to ridiculous results. I think this is a case where Crawford's off-the-cuff response is just wrong. (And they're no longer official, so we don't have to bend reality to make them fit.)
            $endgroup$
            – mattdm
            2 days ago

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144423%2fcan-i-set-a-ready-action-to-trigger-when-literally-anything-happens%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Sum ergo cogito? 1 nng

            419 nièngy_Soadمي 19bal1.5o_g

            Queiggey Chernihivv 9NnOo i Zw X QqKk LpB