Can two creatures, each with a Staff of the Magi, charge them up for free?Does casting a spell from an item allow you to apply class abilities that are used when casting a spell?Can you cast a spell just before the end of a long rest?Can you use a Ring of Spell Storing to store a spell cast from a magic item?Can an ally charge your Staff of the Magi before a long rest by casting a bunch of spells at you?Does the Staff of the Magi absorb AoE spells?PC created magic items and how to scale chargesWhich spell save DC to use for a Staff of the Magi for a multiclass Eldritch Knight/Sorcerer?What does it mean to cast spells from a magic item “using your spell save DC”?Can one cast Shield from the Staff of Defense as a Reaction?Can a Staff of the Magi or Staff of Power be used for Retributive Strike at a distance?Can the Staff of Magi explode when it recharges?Is the charge cost of Wall of Ice an error in the description of the Staff of Frost?Does a cantrip absorbed by a Staff of the Magi give back a charge to said Staff?Can an ally charge your Staff of the Magi before a long rest by casting a bunch of spells at you?

Is it appropriate to ask a job candidate if we can record their interview?

What is paid subscription needed for in Mortal Kombat 11?

Crossing the line between justified force and brutality

What happens if you roll doubles 3 times then land on "Go to jail?"

Method to test if a number is a perfect power?

Opposite of a diet

Is expanding the research of a group into machine learning as a PhD student risky?

What does 算不上 mean in 算不上太美好的日子?

Pre-amplifier input protection

How long to clear the 'suck zone' of a turbofan after start is initiated?

Is HostGator storing my password in plaintext?

Trouble understanding the speech of overseas colleagues

What can we do to stop prior company from asking us questions?

Class Action - which options I have?

How does Loki do this?

Is there a problem with hiding "forgot password" until it's needed?

How does it work when somebody invests in my business?

How to be diplomatic in refusing to write code that breaches the privacy of our users

Is this apparent Class Action settlement a spam message?

Why didn't Theresa May consult with Parliament before negotiating a deal with the EU?

How do I find the solutions of the following equation?

Pole-zeros of a real-valued causal FIR system

Different result between scanning in Epson's "color negative film" mode and scanning in positive -> invert curve in post?

What is the difference between "behavior" and "behaviour"?



Can two creatures, each with a Staff of the Magi, charge them up for free?


Does casting a spell from an item allow you to apply class abilities that are used when casting a spell?Can you cast a spell just before the end of a long rest?Can you use a Ring of Spell Storing to store a spell cast from a magic item?Can an ally charge your Staff of the Magi before a long rest by casting a bunch of spells at you?Does the Staff of the Magi absorb AoE spells?PC created magic items and how to scale chargesWhich spell save DC to use for a Staff of the Magi for a multiclass Eldritch Knight/Sorcerer?What does it mean to cast spells from a magic item “using your spell save DC”?Can one cast Shield from the Staff of Defense as a Reaction?Can a Staff of the Magi or Staff of Power be used for Retributive Strike at a distance?Can the Staff of Magi explode when it recharges?Is the charge cost of Wall of Ice an error in the description of the Staff of Frost?Does a cantrip absorbed by a Staff of the Magi give back a charge to said Staff?Can an ally charge your Staff of the Magi before a long rest by casting a bunch of spells at you?













30












$begingroup$


A Staff of the Magi has the Spell Absorption trait (emphasis mine):




While holding the staff, you have advantage on saving throws against spells. In addition, you can use your reaction when another creature casts a spell that targets only you. If you do, the staff absorbs the magic of the spell, canceling its effect and gaining a number of charges equal to the absorbed spell's level. However, if doing so brings the staff's total number of charges above 50, the staff explodes as if you activated its retributive strike (see below).




The staff also allows you to cast several spells at-will (emphasis mine):




You can also use an action to cast one of the following spells from the staff without using any charges: arcane lock, detect magic, enlarge/reduce, light, mage hand, or protection from evil and good.




Can two creatures - each with a Staff of the Magi - take turns casting enlarge/reduce on each other, regaining two charges per round? Is there some reason why this wouldn't work?




A reasonable response to this would be "how did two characters get the same legendary magic item?"



Unfortunately, Season 8 of Adventurers League allows any Tier 3 or higher character to purchase one. Barring edge cases, any character that plays three 4-hour sessions at Tier 3 or 4 (enough to level up one-and-a-half times) can grab a shiny new Staff of the Magi off the shelf.




This question is related to "Can an ally charge your Staff of the Magi before a long rest by casting a bunch of spells at you?" The difference is the source of spells. Some magic items, like a Ring of Spell Storing, interact differently with spells cast from spell slots vs magic items. I want to make sure I'm not missing any pertinent details.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    30












    $begingroup$


    A Staff of the Magi has the Spell Absorption trait (emphasis mine):




    While holding the staff, you have advantage on saving throws against spells. In addition, you can use your reaction when another creature casts a spell that targets only you. If you do, the staff absorbs the magic of the spell, canceling its effect and gaining a number of charges equal to the absorbed spell's level. However, if doing so brings the staff's total number of charges above 50, the staff explodes as if you activated its retributive strike (see below).




    The staff also allows you to cast several spells at-will (emphasis mine):




    You can also use an action to cast one of the following spells from the staff without using any charges: arcane lock, detect magic, enlarge/reduce, light, mage hand, or protection from evil and good.




    Can two creatures - each with a Staff of the Magi - take turns casting enlarge/reduce on each other, regaining two charges per round? Is there some reason why this wouldn't work?




    A reasonable response to this would be "how did two characters get the same legendary magic item?"



    Unfortunately, Season 8 of Adventurers League allows any Tier 3 or higher character to purchase one. Barring edge cases, any character that plays three 4-hour sessions at Tier 3 or 4 (enough to level up one-and-a-half times) can grab a shiny new Staff of the Magi off the shelf.




    This question is related to "Can an ally charge your Staff of the Magi before a long rest by casting a bunch of spells at you?" The difference is the source of spells. Some magic items, like a Ring of Spell Storing, interact differently with spells cast from spell slots vs magic items. I want to make sure I'm not missing any pertinent details.










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      30












      30








      30


      3



      $begingroup$


      A Staff of the Magi has the Spell Absorption trait (emphasis mine):




      While holding the staff, you have advantage on saving throws against spells. In addition, you can use your reaction when another creature casts a spell that targets only you. If you do, the staff absorbs the magic of the spell, canceling its effect and gaining a number of charges equal to the absorbed spell's level. However, if doing so brings the staff's total number of charges above 50, the staff explodes as if you activated its retributive strike (see below).




      The staff also allows you to cast several spells at-will (emphasis mine):




      You can also use an action to cast one of the following spells from the staff without using any charges: arcane lock, detect magic, enlarge/reduce, light, mage hand, or protection from evil and good.




      Can two creatures - each with a Staff of the Magi - take turns casting enlarge/reduce on each other, regaining two charges per round? Is there some reason why this wouldn't work?




      A reasonable response to this would be "how did two characters get the same legendary magic item?"



      Unfortunately, Season 8 of Adventurers League allows any Tier 3 or higher character to purchase one. Barring edge cases, any character that plays three 4-hour sessions at Tier 3 or 4 (enough to level up one-and-a-half times) can grab a shiny new Staff of the Magi off the shelf.




      This question is related to "Can an ally charge your Staff of the Magi before a long rest by casting a bunch of spells at you?" The difference is the source of spells. Some magic items, like a Ring of Spell Storing, interact differently with spells cast from spell slots vs magic items. I want to make sure I'm not missing any pertinent details.










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      A Staff of the Magi has the Spell Absorption trait (emphasis mine):




      While holding the staff, you have advantage on saving throws against spells. In addition, you can use your reaction when another creature casts a spell that targets only you. If you do, the staff absorbs the magic of the spell, canceling its effect and gaining a number of charges equal to the absorbed spell's level. However, if doing so brings the staff's total number of charges above 50, the staff explodes as if you activated its retributive strike (see below).




      The staff also allows you to cast several spells at-will (emphasis mine):




      You can also use an action to cast one of the following spells from the staff without using any charges: arcane lock, detect magic, enlarge/reduce, light, mage hand, or protection from evil and good.




      Can two creatures - each with a Staff of the Magi - take turns casting enlarge/reduce on each other, regaining two charges per round? Is there some reason why this wouldn't work?




      A reasonable response to this would be "how did two characters get the same legendary magic item?"



      Unfortunately, Season 8 of Adventurers League allows any Tier 3 or higher character to purchase one. Barring edge cases, any character that plays three 4-hour sessions at Tier 3 or 4 (enough to level up one-and-a-half times) can grab a shiny new Staff of the Magi off the shelf.




      This question is related to "Can an ally charge your Staff of the Magi before a long rest by casting a bunch of spells at you?" The difference is the source of spells. Some magic items, like a Ring of Spell Storing, interact differently with spells cast from spell slots vs magic items. I want to make sure I'm not missing any pertinent details.







      dnd-5e spells magic-items






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 days ago









      V2Blast

      25.7k488158




      25.7k488158










      asked 2 days ago









      Chris StarnesChris Starnes

      3,4021928




      3,4021928




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          31












          $begingroup$

          This seems to work



          Casting a spell from an item still counts as casting a spell. See this answer for a good explanation. The simple summary is that most items contain the text:




          ... you can use an action to ... cast one of the following spells ...




          You are casting the spell. Or in this case the other holder of the staff is casting the spell.



          Enlarge/reduce targets only a single object/creature. If you target the holder of a Staff of the Magi, this is a valid trigger for the staff's ability. As your linked question says, there is no requirement for the attacker to be hostile.



          Yes, two Staff of the Magi wielders can fully recharge the staffs for free in just over 2 minutes (from empty).



          This may sound over-powered or totally broken, however it isn't as bad as it sounds. As @BBeast pointed out in a comment on this answer, having a fully charged Staff of the Magi isn't actually ideal. You could easily argue that the defensive benefit of absorbing incoming spells is actually more useful than the casting ability.



          Therefore it is a better idea to keep the staff with only 20-30 charges. This number of charges can easily be maintained day to day by expending the unused spell slots of your allies just before the end of a long rest. The advantage this exploit grants is the ability to quickly recharge the staff after each encounter, so still very powerful, but no more-so than having two Staff of the Magi in the party in the first place.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            "Expending the spell slots of your allies just before a long rest" could backfire badly if you get ambushed in the middle of the night... and it assumes that they weren't tapped out during the day already.
            $endgroup$
            – Ben Barden
            yesterday






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @BenBarden I said immediately before the end of a long rest, not the start. As in get up 5 minutes early, burn any remaining slots and get them back in 5 minutes. It has been confirmed that this works.
            $endgroup$
            – linksassin
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            That sounds intensely fishy to me, and were I DMing I wouldn't permit it at my table. Could you direct me to where it was confirmed?
            $endgroup$
            – Ben Barden
            16 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @BenBarden This answer concludes that the rules allow it.
            $endgroup$
            – Chris Starnes
            14 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @BenBarden see also this sage advice
            $endgroup$
            – linksassin
            6 hours ago










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "122"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143939%2fcan-two-creatures-each-with-a-staff-of-the-magi-charge-them-up-for-free%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          31












          $begingroup$

          This seems to work



          Casting a spell from an item still counts as casting a spell. See this answer for a good explanation. The simple summary is that most items contain the text:




          ... you can use an action to ... cast one of the following spells ...




          You are casting the spell. Or in this case the other holder of the staff is casting the spell.



          Enlarge/reduce targets only a single object/creature. If you target the holder of a Staff of the Magi, this is a valid trigger for the staff's ability. As your linked question says, there is no requirement for the attacker to be hostile.



          Yes, two Staff of the Magi wielders can fully recharge the staffs for free in just over 2 minutes (from empty).



          This may sound over-powered or totally broken, however it isn't as bad as it sounds. As @BBeast pointed out in a comment on this answer, having a fully charged Staff of the Magi isn't actually ideal. You could easily argue that the defensive benefit of absorbing incoming spells is actually more useful than the casting ability.



          Therefore it is a better idea to keep the staff with only 20-30 charges. This number of charges can easily be maintained day to day by expending the unused spell slots of your allies just before the end of a long rest. The advantage this exploit grants is the ability to quickly recharge the staff after each encounter, so still very powerful, but no more-so than having two Staff of the Magi in the party in the first place.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            "Expending the spell slots of your allies just before a long rest" could backfire badly if you get ambushed in the middle of the night... and it assumes that they weren't tapped out during the day already.
            $endgroup$
            – Ben Barden
            yesterday






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @BenBarden I said immediately before the end of a long rest, not the start. As in get up 5 minutes early, burn any remaining slots and get them back in 5 minutes. It has been confirmed that this works.
            $endgroup$
            – linksassin
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            That sounds intensely fishy to me, and were I DMing I wouldn't permit it at my table. Could you direct me to where it was confirmed?
            $endgroup$
            – Ben Barden
            16 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @BenBarden This answer concludes that the rules allow it.
            $endgroup$
            – Chris Starnes
            14 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @BenBarden see also this sage advice
            $endgroup$
            – linksassin
            6 hours ago















          31












          $begingroup$

          This seems to work



          Casting a spell from an item still counts as casting a spell. See this answer for a good explanation. The simple summary is that most items contain the text:




          ... you can use an action to ... cast one of the following spells ...




          You are casting the spell. Or in this case the other holder of the staff is casting the spell.



          Enlarge/reduce targets only a single object/creature. If you target the holder of a Staff of the Magi, this is a valid trigger for the staff's ability. As your linked question says, there is no requirement for the attacker to be hostile.



          Yes, two Staff of the Magi wielders can fully recharge the staffs for free in just over 2 minutes (from empty).



          This may sound over-powered or totally broken, however it isn't as bad as it sounds. As @BBeast pointed out in a comment on this answer, having a fully charged Staff of the Magi isn't actually ideal. You could easily argue that the defensive benefit of absorbing incoming spells is actually more useful than the casting ability.



          Therefore it is a better idea to keep the staff with only 20-30 charges. This number of charges can easily be maintained day to day by expending the unused spell slots of your allies just before the end of a long rest. The advantage this exploit grants is the ability to quickly recharge the staff after each encounter, so still very powerful, but no more-so than having two Staff of the Magi in the party in the first place.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            "Expending the spell slots of your allies just before a long rest" could backfire badly if you get ambushed in the middle of the night... and it assumes that they weren't tapped out during the day already.
            $endgroup$
            – Ben Barden
            yesterday






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @BenBarden I said immediately before the end of a long rest, not the start. As in get up 5 minutes early, burn any remaining slots and get them back in 5 minutes. It has been confirmed that this works.
            $endgroup$
            – linksassin
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            That sounds intensely fishy to me, and were I DMing I wouldn't permit it at my table. Could you direct me to where it was confirmed?
            $endgroup$
            – Ben Barden
            16 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @BenBarden This answer concludes that the rules allow it.
            $endgroup$
            – Chris Starnes
            14 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @BenBarden see also this sage advice
            $endgroup$
            – linksassin
            6 hours ago













          31












          31








          31





          $begingroup$

          This seems to work



          Casting a spell from an item still counts as casting a spell. See this answer for a good explanation. The simple summary is that most items contain the text:




          ... you can use an action to ... cast one of the following spells ...




          You are casting the spell. Or in this case the other holder of the staff is casting the spell.



          Enlarge/reduce targets only a single object/creature. If you target the holder of a Staff of the Magi, this is a valid trigger for the staff's ability. As your linked question says, there is no requirement for the attacker to be hostile.



          Yes, two Staff of the Magi wielders can fully recharge the staffs for free in just over 2 minutes (from empty).



          This may sound over-powered or totally broken, however it isn't as bad as it sounds. As @BBeast pointed out in a comment on this answer, having a fully charged Staff of the Magi isn't actually ideal. You could easily argue that the defensive benefit of absorbing incoming spells is actually more useful than the casting ability.



          Therefore it is a better idea to keep the staff with only 20-30 charges. This number of charges can easily be maintained day to day by expending the unused spell slots of your allies just before the end of a long rest. The advantage this exploit grants is the ability to quickly recharge the staff after each encounter, so still very powerful, but no more-so than having two Staff of the Magi in the party in the first place.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          This seems to work



          Casting a spell from an item still counts as casting a spell. See this answer for a good explanation. The simple summary is that most items contain the text:




          ... you can use an action to ... cast one of the following spells ...




          You are casting the spell. Or in this case the other holder of the staff is casting the spell.



          Enlarge/reduce targets only a single object/creature. If you target the holder of a Staff of the Magi, this is a valid trigger for the staff's ability. As your linked question says, there is no requirement for the attacker to be hostile.



          Yes, two Staff of the Magi wielders can fully recharge the staffs for free in just over 2 minutes (from empty).



          This may sound over-powered or totally broken, however it isn't as bad as it sounds. As @BBeast pointed out in a comment on this answer, having a fully charged Staff of the Magi isn't actually ideal. You could easily argue that the defensive benefit of absorbing incoming spells is actually more useful than the casting ability.



          Therefore it is a better idea to keep the staff with only 20-30 charges. This number of charges can easily be maintained day to day by expending the unused spell slots of your allies just before the end of a long rest. The advantage this exploit grants is the ability to quickly recharge the staff after each encounter, so still very powerful, but no more-so than having two Staff of the Magi in the party in the first place.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 2 days ago









          V2Blast

          25.7k488158




          25.7k488158










          answered 2 days ago









          linksassinlinksassin

          9,10513068




          9,10513068











          • $begingroup$
            "Expending the spell slots of your allies just before a long rest" could backfire badly if you get ambushed in the middle of the night... and it assumes that they weren't tapped out during the day already.
            $endgroup$
            – Ben Barden
            yesterday






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @BenBarden I said immediately before the end of a long rest, not the start. As in get up 5 minutes early, burn any remaining slots and get them back in 5 minutes. It has been confirmed that this works.
            $endgroup$
            – linksassin
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            That sounds intensely fishy to me, and were I DMing I wouldn't permit it at my table. Could you direct me to where it was confirmed?
            $endgroup$
            – Ben Barden
            16 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @BenBarden This answer concludes that the rules allow it.
            $endgroup$
            – Chris Starnes
            14 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @BenBarden see also this sage advice
            $endgroup$
            – linksassin
            6 hours ago
















          • $begingroup$
            "Expending the spell slots of your allies just before a long rest" could backfire badly if you get ambushed in the middle of the night... and it assumes that they weren't tapped out during the day already.
            $endgroup$
            – Ben Barden
            yesterday






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @BenBarden I said immediately before the end of a long rest, not the start. As in get up 5 minutes early, burn any remaining slots and get them back in 5 minutes. It has been confirmed that this works.
            $endgroup$
            – linksassin
            yesterday










          • $begingroup$
            That sounds intensely fishy to me, and were I DMing I wouldn't permit it at my table. Could you direct me to where it was confirmed?
            $endgroup$
            – Ben Barden
            16 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @BenBarden This answer concludes that the rules allow it.
            $endgroup$
            – Chris Starnes
            14 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @BenBarden see also this sage advice
            $endgroup$
            – linksassin
            6 hours ago















          $begingroup$
          "Expending the spell slots of your allies just before a long rest" could backfire badly if you get ambushed in the middle of the night... and it assumes that they weren't tapped out during the day already.
          $endgroup$
          – Ben Barden
          yesterday




          $begingroup$
          "Expending the spell slots of your allies just before a long rest" could backfire badly if you get ambushed in the middle of the night... and it assumes that they weren't tapped out during the day already.
          $endgroup$
          – Ben Barden
          yesterday




          2




          2




          $begingroup$
          @BenBarden I said immediately before the end of a long rest, not the start. As in get up 5 minutes early, burn any remaining slots and get them back in 5 minutes. It has been confirmed that this works.
          $endgroup$
          – linksassin
          yesterday




          $begingroup$
          @BenBarden I said immediately before the end of a long rest, not the start. As in get up 5 minutes early, burn any remaining slots and get them back in 5 minutes. It has been confirmed that this works.
          $endgroup$
          – linksassin
          yesterday












          $begingroup$
          That sounds intensely fishy to me, and were I DMing I wouldn't permit it at my table. Could you direct me to where it was confirmed?
          $endgroup$
          – Ben Barden
          16 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          That sounds intensely fishy to me, and were I DMing I wouldn't permit it at my table. Could you direct me to where it was confirmed?
          $endgroup$
          – Ben Barden
          16 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          @BenBarden This answer concludes that the rules allow it.
          $endgroup$
          – Chris Starnes
          14 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @BenBarden This answer concludes that the rules allow it.
          $endgroup$
          – Chris Starnes
          14 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          @BenBarden see also this sage advice
          $endgroup$
          – linksassin
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @BenBarden see also this sage advice
          $endgroup$
          – linksassin
          6 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143939%2fcan-two-creatures-each-with-a-staff-of-the-magi-charge-them-up-for-free%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Sum ergo cogito? 1 nng

          419 nièngy_Soadمي 19bal1.5o_g

          Queiggey Chernihivv 9NnOo i Zw X QqKk LpB